Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management

Similar documents
Puakea, Hawaiÿi. Puakea, Hawaiÿi WATERSHED FEATURES

Keanahalululu Gulch, Hawaiÿi

Presented by: Bryan Bloch GIS Specialist DNREC Division of Watershed Stewardship

A Comprehensive Inventory of the Number of Modified Stream Channels in the State of Minnesota. Data, Information and Knowledge Management.

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

WELCOME Lake Wabukayne OPEN HOUSE

Application of an Enhanced, Fine-Scale SWAT Model to Target Land Management Practices for Maximizing Pollutant Reduction and Conservation Benefits

Data Dictionary Hudson River Features: Estuary shoreline Flood scenario Emergency Services: Police stations Fire stations EMS

Wetlands and Riparian Mapping Framework Technical Meeting

MARYLAND S LAND USE/LAND COVER MAP AND ASSOCIATED ANALYSIS

Geospatial Data, Services, and Products. National Surveying, mapping and geospatial conference

North Wales PRP for Wissahickon Creek Nutrients

Huron Creek Watershed 2005 Land Use Map

Spatial Data Availability Energizes Florida s Citizens

Wailupe, Oÿahu. Wailupe, Oÿahu WATERSHED FEATURES

Living in a Watershed

Geospatial SDI Portal for effective Governance of Pune METROPOLIS region

Wetland Mapping & Functional Assessment Canadian River Watershed New Mexico. Association of State Wetland Managers

Effects of input DEM data spatial resolution on Upstream Flood modeling result A case study in Willamette river downtown Portland

Techniques for Science Teachers: Using GIS in Science Classrooms.

Wailua, Maui WATERSHED FEATURES

Land Use Methods & Metrics Development Outcome

USGS Hydrography Overview. May 9, 2018

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES WAYS & MEANS SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES MARCH 2, 2017

ESRI NONPROFIT/CONSERVATION GRANTS PROGRAM STATUS REPORT JANUARY 2010

Defining the Limit of Regulated Areas. C.1 Defining the River or Stream Flood Hazard 138. C.2 Defining the River or Stream Erosion Hazard 139

The Road to Data in Baltimore

Learning Objectives: I can identify and interpret river flows and directions.

New Land Cover & Land Use Data for the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

STUDY GUIDE FOR CONTENT MASTERY. Surface Water Movement

Your web browser (Safari 7) is out of date. For more security, comfort and the best experience on this site: Update your browser Ignore

2011 Land Use/Land Cover Delineation. Meghan Jenkins, GIS Analyst, GISP Jennifer Kinzer, GIS Coordinator, GISP

South Florida Coastal Storm Surge and Mapping Study

Semester Project Final Report. Logan River Flood Plain Analysis Using ArcGIS, HEC-GeoRAS, and HEC-RAS

Using Big Interagency Databases to Identify Climate Refugia for Idaho s Species of Concern

NAVAJO NATION PROFILE

Catastrophic Events Impact on Ecosystems

STEREO ANALYST FOR ERDAS IMAGINE Stereo Feature Collection for the GIS Professional

Pierce Cedar Creek Institute GIS Development Final Report. Grand Valley State University

Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes

Delineation of Watersheds

Assessment of Lake Forest Lake Sediment Trapping Efficiency and Capacity. Marlon R. Cook Groundwater Assessment Program Geological Survey of Alabama

Chesapeake Bay Program s New Land Cover Map (and some other neat stuff)

RANGE AND ANIMAL SCIENCES AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT - Vol. II - Catchment Management A Framework for Managing Rangelands - Hugh Milner

Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin

Water Atlas Overview. Myakka River Management Coordinating Council June 22, 2012 Englewood, Florida

Chapter 3 - White Oak River Subbasin Includes Bogue Sound and the Newport River

United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Northeast Region

Chesapeake Bay Remote Sensing Pilot Executive Briefing

Chapter 4 French Broad River Subbasin Including the: French Broad River, Little Ivy Creek (River), Ivy Creek, California Creek and Bull Creek

Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) South Branch Codorus Creek Watershed York County

APPENDIX PHASE 1 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK

GIS Monroe Geographic Information System March 14, 2018

NATIONAL HYDROGRAPHY DATASET (NHD) UPDATE PROJECT FOR US FOREST SERVICE REGION 3

MISSOURI LiDAR Stakeholders Meeting

ROAD SEDIMENT ASSESSMENT & MODELING: KOOTENAI-FISHER TMDL PLANNING AREA ROAD GIS LAYERS & SUMMARY STATISTICS

LONG POINT REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY

Highland Lake Bathymetric Survey

Sediment and nutrient transport and storage along the urban stream corridor

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Ms. A. Mormando's Class *

Rabbit River Turbidity Total Maximum Daily Load Report (Impaired River Reach AUID )

How Do Geology and Physical Streambed Characteristics Affect Water Quality?

Sediment Deposition LET THE RIVER RUN T E A C H E R. Activity Overview. Activity at a Glance. Time Required. Level of Complexity.

Watershed Analysis Using Remote Sensing and GPS

Evaluating Wildlife Habitats

Fig 1. Steps in the EcoValue Project

Ecology of Cyanobacteria. Lisa B. Cleckner, Director September 30, 2017

Web (Java, ArcGIS Server [WebADF, flex, silverlight]) Mobile (ArcGIS Mobile, ArcPad, Windows Mobile) Deskt

Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission 2016 Treasurer's Report

National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Update Project for US Forest Service Region 3

Roger Andy Gaines, Research Civil Engineer, PhD, P.E.

3.11 Floodplains Existing Conditions

Regional GIS Initiatives Geospatial Technology Center

Virginia Shoreline Mapping Tools

SEAGRASS COVERAGE TRENDS IN THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON SYSTEM

Urban Tree Canopy Assessment Purcellville, Virginia

What are the issues?

Compact guides GISCO. Geographic information system of the Commission

Home About Us Articles Press Releases Image Gallery Contact Us Media Kit Free Subscription 10/5/2006 5:56:35 PM

The Refugia Concept: Using Watershed Analysis to Prioritize Salmonid Habitat for Conservation and Restoration

Which map shows the stream drainage pattern that most likely formed on the surface of this volcano? A) B)

Data Collection and GIS Applications

Understanding the effects of roads in upland settings on hydrology, geomorphology and water quality

PPT Slide. Slide 1 of 32. Notes:

Gina Hunt Chesapeake Bay Program Fish Habitat Coordinator

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Chapter 6. Fundamentals of GIS-Based Data Analysis for Decision Support. Table 6.1. Spatial Data Transformations by Geospatial Data Types

Megan Durden, North Carolina State Archives Butch Lazorchak, Library of Congress Mark Myers, Kentucky State Archives Best Practices Exchange, Helena,

GIS and Coastal Nutrients Luke Cole

Keaÿahala, Oÿahu. Keaÿahala, Oÿahu WATERSHED FEATURES

Flood Hazard Zone Modeling for Regulation Development

low turbidity high turbidity

Graduate Courses Meteorology / Atmospheric Science UNC Charlotte

Overview of fluvial and geotechnical processes for TMDL assessment

The Emerging Role of Enterprise GIS in State Forest Agencies

Urbanization factors in the Gilleland Creek watershed, Travis County, Texas. Michael Kanarek GEO386G Final Project Dec. 2, 2011

Illinois State Water Survey Division

Lesson Plan 3 Land Cover Changes Over Time. An Introduction to Land Cover Changes over Time

Designing a Dam for Blockhouse Ranch. Haley Born

Transcription:

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management New York Federation of Lake Association 2014 Conference, Celebrating Lake Stewardship May 2-4, 2014 Robert N. Brower, CEO IAGT

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management A Brief Description of GIS and GIT The Watershed Protection and Management Process and Stewardship Managing the Lake and Watershed with GIS/GIT A Range of Applications

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management A Brief Description of GIS and GIT The Watershed Protection and Management Process and Stewardship Managing the Lake and Watershed with GIS/GIT A Range of Applications

IAGT Mission Quick Review help communities and society realize the benefits of Geospatial Information Technologies (GIT) through education, outreach and innovative applications. IAGT meshes the strengths of GPS, remote sensing, aerial photography digital mapping, geospatial data, visualization applications, and web-based technologies into customized solutions and decision support tools for business, educators, and government agencies.

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management A Brief Description of GIS and GIT Geospatial data is information that identifies the geographic location and characteristics of natural or constructed features and boundaries on the earth, typically represented by points, lines, polygons, and/or complex geographic features. http://www.epa.gov/

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management Analysis and Integration Definition of Issue Derivation of Spatial Data Capture of Data Location of Data

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management A Brief Description of GIS and GIT About 770,000 results (0.78 seconds) 1. tableausoftware.com Adwww.tableausoftware.com/ has 2,641 followers on Google+ 2.. GPSNavX for Mac - gpsnavx.com 3. Welcome to the QGIS project! www.qgis.org/ A Free and Open Source Geographic Information System... Create, edit, visualise, analyse and publish geospatial information on Windows, Mac, Linux, BSD... Download - Documentation - QGIS Plugins planet - Discover QGIS 4. GRASS GIS - Home 5. http://www.mapwindow.org/

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management A Brief Description of GIS and GIT The Watershed Protection and Management Process and Stewardship Managing the Lake and Watershed with GIS/GIT A Range of Applications (5 minutes)

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management The Watershed Protection and Management Process What is a watershed? A watershed is an area of land that drains into a body of water, such as a lake, river, reservoir, estuary, sea or ocean. The watershed includes both the streams and rivers that convey the water, and the land from which the water runs off. Watersheds are separated from adjacent watersheds by high points such as ridges, hills and mountains.

Watershed/Landscape Model Barry M. Evans, PhD.

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management The Watershed Protection and Management Process The Division of Water, Watershed Management Cycle, NYSDEC

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management Watershed Stewardship - Taking action to help preserve and protect our water resources. NYSDEC website Stewardship - protectorship, guardianship, custodianship Under the noun Protection in Roget s Thesaurus, 1817-2007

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management The Penn State Master Watershed Steward program was established to strengthen local capacity for management and protection of watersheds, streams, and rivers, by educating and empowering volunteers across the commonwealth. http://extension.psu.edu/

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management Example projects include: Organizing educational and informational workshops for the public, students and municipal officials on topics such as rain barrels, wildlife, pollution prevention, stormwater management, and invasive plant control Organizing and executing stream clean ups Designing and installing demonstration rain gardens Monitoring streams for bacteria Carrying out stream bank restoration projects http://extension.psu.edu/

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management A Brief Description of GIS and GIT The Watershed Protection and Management Process and Stewardship Managing the Lake and Watershed with GIS/GIT A Range of Applications

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management The Watershed Protection and Management Process Assessment Planning & Management Monitoring The Division of Water, Watershed Management Cycle, NYSDEC

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management The Watershed Protection and Management Process Assessment 1. Nutrient Allocation Models 2. Invasive Species Survey 3. Watershed Land Value Assessment The Division of Water, Watershed Management Cycle, NYSDEC

Estimation of Nutrient Loads to Owasco Lake Barry M. Evans Penn State Institutes of Energy and the Environment University Park PA

Barry M. Evans

Barry M. Evans

www.erh.noaa.gov/nerfc/basin_info/owsn6.htm l Owasco Lake / Watershed Water Quality Trophic Status Owasco Lake OWN IT State of the Lake Conference March 1, 2014 John D Halfman Environmental Studies Program Department of Geoscience Finger Lakes Institute

Phosphoru s Budget Past Three Years Year Stream Input (tons/year) Output (t/y) Net (t/y) 2011 15 2.4 12 2012 1.9 1.6-1.8 2013 3.1 (8.4) 5.9-2.8 (3.5)

Summary Rain Intensity/Totals Critical to Stream Delivery of: Phosphates Suspended Sediments Sources Agricultural Runoff Events Stream Bank Erosion More Effort Required Wastewater Treatment Facilities Continuous Septics

Community Mapping and The Land Value Analysis Some Preliminary Findings Based on Student GIS Analysis of the Land Value of the Cayuga County Portion of the Owasco Lake Watershed

The Community Mapping Program Mike Gordon, SUNY Cortland Tim McKillen, SUNY Cortland Rusty Ingerson, CCC Corrine Murray, LaMoyne Nick Topichak, CCC,Virginia Tech Jason MacLeod, Festa Fellow, SUNY Oswego

Assessed Land Value of the Parcels

Assessed Land Value Shoreline Only

Assessed Market Value (Per Acre)

Assessed Land Value and HUC s

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management Tax Parcel Findings on land taxes 52% of all parcels in the Cayuga County Portion of the Owasco Lake Watershed are Agricultural There is one land based exemption in the data: Agricultural Land Exemption Lowest agricultural land exemption $569.00 Highest agricultural land exemption $528,339.00

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management Tax Parcel Findings on land taxes Total agricultural land exemptions for parcels in the Cayuga County Portion of the Owasco Lake Watershed $37,578,064 (53% annually) Average Agricultural exemption amount for area studied $51,975.19 Total taxes paid on land in area studied $31,659,214.48 (47% annually) There is $5,918,849.52 more in land exemptions than taxes paid in the area studied. (annually)

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management The Watershed Protection and Management Process Planning & Manage. 1. Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Efforts 2. Wetlands Planning and Stakeholder Survey The Division of Water, Watershed Management Cycle, NYSDEC

Sediment and Nutrient Loading Goal, Objective, and Strategies Report to the Cayuga County Water Quality Management Agency by the Sediment and Nutrient Loading Reduction Working Group March 7, 2013

Goal: Reduce sediment and nutrient loadings in waterbodies where problems or impacts caused by sediment and nutrients are apparent, and prevent excess loadings in all other waterbodies across the County Objective: Support the application of best management practices to treat or reduce causal factors of sediment and nutrient loading in areas and situations where they will have the greatest effect.

SEDIMENT AND NUTRIENT LOADING Nutrient Loading Potential of Subwatersheds Relative differences in the nutrient loading potential of hydrological units at a certain scale may be reliably estimated on the basis of what is known about the quantities of nutrients that are generated by the different types of land cover present.

CLASS NAME P COEFF (kg/ha/yr)* Coeff Source Developed, High Intensity 0.70 1 Developed, Medium Intensity 0.40 1 Developed, Low Intensity 0.10 1 Developed, Open Space 0.10 1 Cultivated Crops 2.10 1 Pasture/Hay 0.45 1 Grassland/Herbaceous 0.28 1 Deciduous Forest 0.07 1 Evergreen Forest 0.20 1 Mixed Forest 0.14 1 Scrub/Shrub 0.28 1 Palustrine Forested Wetland 0.09 1 Palustrine Scrub/Shrub Wetland 0.09 2 Palustrine Emergent Wetland 0.10 1 Unconsolidated Shore 0.19 2 Bare Land 0.28 1 Palustrine Aquatic Bed 0.10 2 Open Water (ignored in the analysis) *1 kg/ha/yr = 0.892 lbs/ac/yr Land Cover Classes and P

Average Export Coefficient (kg/ha/yr)* 0.294-0.449 0.483-0.562 0.615-0.748 0.831-1.033 1.073-1.268 *1 kg/ha/yr = 0.892 lbs/ac/yr 1 Eightmile Creek-Frontal Lake Ontario 2 Ninemile Creek 3 Amherst Island-Frontal Lake Ontario 4 Sterling Valley Creek 5 Sterling Creek 6 Headwaters Sterling Creek 7 Ox Creek 8 Red Creek 9 Muskrat Creek 10 Cross Lake-Seneca River 11 Howland Island-Seneca River 12 Stark Pond - Seneca River 13 Skaneateles Creek 14 Owasco Outlet 15 Cold Spring Brook 16 Putnam Brook 17 Kipp Island-Seneca River 18 Crane Brook 19 Demont Creek-Cayuga Lake 20 Owasco Lake 21 Outlet Skaneateles Lake 22 Yawger Creek 23 Dutch Hollow Brook 24 Grout Brook-Skaneateles Lake 25 Red Creek-Cayuga Lake 26 Big Salmon Creek 27 Mill Creek 28 Hemlock Creek-Owasco Inlet 29 Paines Creek-Cayuga Lake 30 Shelldrake Creek-Cayuga Lake 31 Upper Fall Creek 32 Lively Run-Cayuga Lake 33 Headwaters Owasco Inlet 34 Salmon Creek

FINAL REPORT of the OWASCO FLATS Conservation Planning and Stakeholder Survey Project June 2007 By Mark Whitmore and the Finger Lakes Land Trust Funding for this project was provided by the Central New York Regional Planning and Development Board under a grant secured through the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Finger Lakes Water Resources, Agriculture, and Open Lands Conservation Project.

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management The Watershed Protection and Management Process Monitoring 1. Aquatic Invasive Species 2. Citizen Monitoring Program (OWLA CCWQMA) 3. OWN 4. FIMS The Division of Water, Watershed Management Cycle, NYSDEC

New York Federation of Lake Association 2014 Conference, Celebrating Lake Stewardship www.owla.org bbrower@iagt.org www.owascolake.org Robert N. Brower, CEO November 15, 2013 Finger Lakes Research Conference, The Finger Lakes Institute at Hobart and William Smith

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management A Brief Description of GIS and GIT The Watershed Protection and Management Process and Stewardship Managing the Lake and Watershed with GIS/GIT A Range of Applications