S. L. Lee K. W. Liang X. B. Pan RogerC.E.Tan. Department of Mathematics,

Similar documents
Mathematical modelling and controlling the dynamics of infectious diseases

Forecast and Control of Epidemics in a Globalized World

Thursday. Threshold and Sensitivity Analysis

Introduction to SEIR Models

On a stochastic epidemic SEIHR model and its diffusion approximation

PARAMETER ESTIMATION IN EPIDEMIC MODELS: SIMPLIFIED FORMULAS

1 Disease Spread Model

Trade Patterns, Production networks, and Trade and employment in the Asia-US region

Mathematical Modeling and Analysis of Infectious Disease Dynamics

Super-spreaders and the rate of transmission of the SARS virus

Stability of SEIR Model of Infectious Diseases with Human Immunity

Age-dependent branching processes with incubation

(mathematical epidemiology)

EPIDEMIC MODELS I REPRODUCTION NUMBERS AND FINAL SIZE RELATIONS FRED BRAUER

Epidemics and information spreading

Epidemics on networks

Estimating the Exponential Growth Rate and R 0

Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. Effect of Personal Hygiene Campaign on the Transmission Model of Hepatitis A

Non-Linear Models Cont d: Infectious Diseases. Non-Linear Models Cont d: Infectious Diseases

University of Minnesota Duluth Department of Mathematics and Statistics. Modeling of Ebola Control Strategies

Modelling of the Hand-Foot-Mouth-Disease with the Carrier Population

Mathematical Analysis of Epidemiological Models: Introduction

Modelling the dynamics of dengue real epidemics

HETEROGENEOUS MIXING IN EPIDEMIC MODELS

Epidemics on networks

Quarantine generated phase transition in epidemic spreading. Abstract

Chapter 6: The Laplace Transform 6.3 Step Functions and

Mathematical Epidemiology Lecture 1. Matylda Jabłońska-Sabuka

Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. Effect of Education Campaign on Transmission Model of Conjunctivitis

Electronic appendices are refereed with the text. However, no attempt has been made to impose a uniform editorial style on the electronic appendices.

ANALYSIS OF DIPHTHERIA DISSEMINATION BY USING MULTI GROUPS OF DYNAMIC SYSTEM METHOD APPROACH

Research Article Modeling and Analysis of Epidemic Diffusion within Small-World Network

Epidemics in Complex Networks and Phase Transitions

MODELING THE SPREAD OF DENGUE FEVER BY USING SIR MODEL. Hor Ming An, PM. Dr. Yudariah Mohammad Yusof

Kasetsart University Workshop. Mathematical modeling using calculus & differential equations concepts

The SIR Disease Model Trajectories and MatLab

Modeling the Spread of Epidemic Cholera: an Age-Structured Model

Epidemics in Networks Part 2 Compartmental Disease Models

Chapter 4 An Introduction to Networks in Epidemic Modeling

Housing Market Monitor

Models of Infectious Disease Formal Demography Stanford Spring Workshop in Formal Demography May 2008

An intrinsic connection between Richards model and SIR model

Supplemental Information Population Dynamics of Epidemic and Endemic States of Drug-Resistance Emergence in Infectious Diseases

Global Analysis of an Epidemic Model with Nonmonotone Incidence Rate

Mathematical Model of Tuberculosis Spread within Two Groups of Infected Population

PAIRWISE ACCELERATED FAILURE TIME MODELS FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASE TRANSMISSION DATA

CS224W: Analysis of Networks Jure Leskovec, Stanford University

arxiv: v2 [cs.si] 15 Apr 2016

A Preliminary Mathematical Model for the Dynamic Transmission of Dengue, Chikungunya and Zika

Plausible Models for Propagation of the SARS Virus

On the Spread of Epidemics in a Closed Heterogeneous Population

Toward a benchmark GPU platform to simulate XVA

Supplement to TB in Canadian First Nations at the turn-of-the twentieth century

Global Stability of a Computer Virus Model with Cure and Vertical Transmission

Stochastic Modelling of Specific modes of HIV/AIDS Epidemic. Olorunsola E. Olowofeso

arxiv: v2 [q-bio.pe] 7 Nov 2015

István Faragó, Róbert Horváth. Numerical Analysis of Evolution Equations, Innsbruck, Austria October, 2014.

MCMC 2: Lecture 3 SIR models - more topics. Phil O Neill Theo Kypraios School of Mathematical Sciences University of Nottingham

Understanding the contribution of space on the spread of Influenza using an Individual-based model approach

Mathematical Modeling, Simulation, and Time Series Analysis of Seasonal Epidemics.

ME 406 S-I-R Model of Epidemics Part 2 Vital Dynamics Included

Approximation of epidemic models by diffusion processes and their statistical inferencedes

Hepatitis C Mathematical Model

Transmission of Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease and Its Potential Driving

Chaos, Solitons and Fractals

STABILITY ANALYSIS OF A GENERAL SIR EPIDEMIC MODEL

Fixed Point Analysis of Kermack Mckendrick SIR Model

Peninsular Florida p Modeled Water Table Depth Arboviral Epidemic Risk Assessment. Current Assessment: 06/08/2008 Week 23 Initial Wetting Phase

Stochastic modelling of epidemic spread

Models of Infectious Disease Formal Demography Stanford Summer Short Course James Holland Jones, Instructor. August 15, 2005

Dynamical models of HIV-AIDS e ect on population growth

Spatial correlations in SIR epidemic models

GEMF: GENERALIZED EPIDEMIC MODELING FRAMEWORK SOFTWARE IN PYTHON

Modelling spatio-temporal patterns of disease

Role of GIS in Tracking and Controlling Spread of Disease

Inferring the origin of an epidemic with a dynamic message-passing algorithm

A New Mathematical Approach for. Rabies Endemy

Stochastic modelling of epidemic spread

Figure The Threshold Theorem of epidemiology

Bayesian Inference for Contact Networks Given Epidemic Data

Viable Control of an Epidemiological Model

Recovering the Time-Dependent Transmission Rate in an SIR Model from Data and an Overfitting Danger

Complex networks: an introduction Alain Barrat

Spatial Epidemic Modelling in Social Networks

Science One Math. October 23, 2018

Temporal and spatial mapping of hand, foot and mouth disease in Sarawak, Malaysia

Section 8.1 Def. and Examp. Systems

Three Disguises of 1 x = e λx

SIR model. (Susceptible-Infected-Resistant/Removed) Outlook. Introduction into SIR model. Janusz Szwabiński

The Exponential function f with base b is f (x) = b x where b > 0, b 1, x a real number

Module 02 Control Systems Preliminaries, Intro to State Space

The SEIR Dynamical Transmission Model of Dengue Disease with and Without the Vertical Transmission of the Virus

EARLY DETECTION OF BIOTERRORISM: MONITORING DISEASE USING AN AGENT-BASED MODEL

Qualitative Analysis of a Discrete SIR Epidemic Model

J. ARINO, W. HU, K. KHAN, D. KOSSOWSKY AND L. SANZ

Infectious Disease Modeling with Interpersonal Contact Patterns as a Heterogeneous Network

Exact Solution to a Dynamic SIR Model

A Note on the Spread of Infectious Diseases. in a Large Susceptible Population

GLOBAL DYNAMICS OF A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF TUBERCULOSIS

Momentum Balances & Quadratic Equations

Transcription:

SEIR MODEL: SARS OUTSIDE THE HOSPITAL S. L. Lee K. W. Liang X. B. Pan RogerC.E.Tan Department of Mathematics, NUS Typeset by AMS-TEX 1

2 Some Questions of SARS Epidemic ² Epidemics in hospital vs. outside hospital Different dynamics? Medical staff had higher risk, at least in the first weeks of SARS outbreak. Rapid initial spread of SARS occured in hospital in Vietnam, Hong Kong, Singapore, Canada.

3 ² Superspreading vs. normal spreading Different modes of transmission? Hong Kong: Prince of Wales hospital, 125 infected by one. Guangzhou: 130 infected by one. Singapore: 103 infected by 5. Before having complete understood of these questions, we began with examining the epidemic dynamics outside hospital.

4 Population Outside Hospital Divided Into 4 Groups S: Susceptible, can contract the virus. E: Exposed, exposed to the virus but not yet infective. I: Infective, contract SARS and can infect others. R: Removed, former infective who are no longer infectious (quarantined in hospital, recovered, died). S =) E=) I=) R

5 Assumptions 1. The total population N is constant. The populations in the class S, E, I and R are S(t), E(t), I(t) and R(t) respectively. S(t)+E(t)+I(t)+R(t) =N.

6 2. The rate of change in S is proportional to the number of contacts between members of S and I. The number of contact is proportional to I(t)S(t) if I(t) is small, and proportional to S(t) if I(t) is large. The strength of the virus decays in time. S 0 = F (I,S,t)S,

7 F>0, F t < 0, F» λi for small I and t, F is bounded for large I. In practice, we may take F = F (I,t).

8 3. During the incubation period the individual does not infect others. Let the incubation period be τ days. It is the time length an individual stays in the group E. E(t) =S(t τ) S(t).

An infective individual is capable of transmitting the virus to others. 9 4. The individual will be quarantined in hospital immediately after having been infective for T days. Thus T is the time length the infective individual stays in the class I. R 0 (t) =I(t T ).

10 S 0 (t) = F (I,t)S, SEIR Model E(t) =S(t τ) S(t), I 0 (t) =F I(t τ),t τ S(t τ) I(t T ), R 0 (t) =I(t τ). (1) Initial conditions are given on the interval [ τ, 0], assuming T<τ.

Consider that the infective are not quarantined exactly T days after being infective, the model is modified to 11 S 0 (t) = F (I,t)S, E(t) =S(t τ) S(t), I 0 (t) =F I(t τ),t τ S(t τ) R 0 (t) = X k j I(t T + j). 0 j<t X 0 j<t k j I(t T + j), (2)

12 SARS Epdemic Outside Hospital in Singapore We computed the model against the data from March 13 to April 26, 2003. t =0onthedayMarch19. Tofit thedata,we choose F (I,t)=e h(t) g(i), where, for I not very large, g(i) = bi + δt2, h(t) =βt 1+c 1 I + c 2 I 2 + c 3 I3 1+γt.

13 Value of Parameters τ =5, T =3, b = 2.8 N. N = 3500000, K 0 = K 1 = K 2 =0.3, c 1 =0.08, c 2 =0.03, c 3 =0.1, β =0.62, δ =0.003, γ =0.99.

14 Observation From Computation The model fits the data best when τ =5, T =3, b = 2.8 N. ² Incubation period: After we had finished the computation welearnedthatinsingapore,τ =5.2. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 52, 405 (2003). In Hong Kong, τ =6.4 days, Donnell et al, Lancet, 361 (2003).

² Value of T : We were not able to find reported value of T in Singapore. In Hong Kong: T is between 3 and 5 days, longer earlier in the epidemic. Donnell et al, Lancet, 361 (2003). ² The model is sensitive in b. Butisrobustinotherparameters. ² Not as the standard SIR model where the curve exhibits one peak, the solution of SEIR model exhibits oscillation. 15

16 AConsequence F (I,t)=g(I)e h(t)» probability of a person outside hospital contracting the virus per day, g(i)e h(t) S» g(i)e h(t) N» number of persons infected by I I an infective outside hospital per day. Consider an infective who stays outside hospital in the time

17 interval [t 0,t 0 + T ]. We may use Z t0 +T t 0 g 0 (I(t))e h(t) dt to give a rough estimate of the expected number of secondary infections generated by him outside hospital, where g 0 (I) = 2.8 1+0.08I +0.03I 2 +0.1I 3, h(t) = 0.62t +0.003t2 1+0.99t.

18 For large t, h(t)» 0.62 0.99» 0.63. If we choose I = 2 (which is close to the average), we can estimate the integral by 3g 0 (2)e 0.63 =3 1.35 0.53» 2.1. Lipsitch et al. estimated that in Singapore, including the transmission in hospitals, a single infective produced 2.2» 3.6 secondary cases.

19 Note that F (I,t)=g 0 (I)e h(t) I N. For large t, asabove,choosingtheaverageinfectivei =2,wemay estimate the probability of a person outside hospital contracting the virus per day by F (I,t)» 1.35 0.53 2 N» 1.4 N.

20 Next Step To understand SARS epidemic we have to examine the transmission in hospital, and understand the superspreading events. The phenomenon is very complicated. We do not expect any simple model. Let us try a...

21 Two-population model: a model including superspreaders The total population is divided into 5 groups. ²S: Susceptible, can contract the virus. S = S m [S n, S m :medicalstaff, S n :others. The population in the classes S m and S n are S m (t) ands n (t)

22 respectively, S(t) =S m (t)+s n (t). ²E: Exposed, exposed to the virus but not yet infective. The population in the class E is E(t).

23 ²I: Infective, contract SARS and can infect others. I = I w [I g, T w : weakly infective; I g : strongly infective (super-spreaders). The population in the classes I w and I g are I w (t) andi g (t) respectively, I(t) =I w (t)+i g (t).

24 ²P: Patients, quarantined in hospital. The population in the class P is P (t). P = P w [P g, P w : patients who are weakly infective; P g : patients who are strongly infective (super-spreaders). The population in the classes P w and P g are P w (t) andp g (t) respectively, P (t) =P w (t)+p g (t).

²R: Removed, former infective who are no longer infectious (including recovered, died, isolated). The population in the class R is R(t). 25 S =) E=) I=) P=) R

26 Assumptions 1. The total population N is constant. S(t)+E(t)+I(t)+P (t)+r(t) =N. 2. Patients in hospital contact only medical staff. The members in S n can be infected by members in I only. The members in S m can be infected by members both in I and in P.

3. During the incubation period the individual does not infect others. The incubation period is τ days. 4. The weakly and strongly infective patients are recovered at the rate c w or c g respectively: 27 R 0 (t) =c g P g (t)+c w P w (t), c g c w. 5. An infective individual is capable of transmitting the virus to others. The individual will be quarantined in hospital immediately after having been infective for T days.

28 The model is: Sn(t) 0 = F n Ig (t),i w (t),t S n (t), h Sm(t) 0 = F n Ig (t),i w (t),t + F m Pg (t),p w (t),t i S m (t), E(t) =S n (t τ)+s m (t τ) S n (t) S m (t), Iw(t) 0 =H wn (I g (t τ),i w (t τ),t τ)s n (t τ) + H wm Ig (t τ),i w (t τ),t τ S m (t τ) + Q P g (t τ),p w (t τ),t τ S m (t τ) I w (t T ),

29 I 0 g(t) = + hf n Ig (t τ),i w (t τ),t τ H wn Ig (t τ),i w (t τ),t τ i S n (t τ) hf n Ig (t τ),i w (t τ),t τ + F m Pg (t τ),p w (t τ),t τ H wm Ig (t τ),i w (t τ),t τ Q P g (t τ),p w (t τ),t τ i S m (t τ) I g (t T ), Pg(t) 0 =I g (t T ) c g P g (t), Pw 0 (t) =I w(t T ) c w P w (t), R 0 (t) =c g P g (t)+c w P w (t).

30 where c g c w. The model can be modified to reflect the fact that the infective are not quarantined exactly T days after being infective, In practice, we can take F, H, Q to be linear functions.

31 Sn ³α 0 (t) = ng I g (t)+α nw I w (t) S n (t), ³ Sm(t) 0 = α ng I g (t)+α nw I w (t)+α mg P g (t)+α mw P w (t) S m (t), E(t) =S n (t τ)+s m (t τ) S n (t) S m (t), h i Iw(t) 0 = β ng I g (t τ)+β nw I w (t τ) S n (t τ) h i + β mg I g (t τ)+β mw I w (t τ) S m (t τ) h i + γ g P g (t τ)+γ w P w (t τ) S m (t τ) I w (t T ),

32 h i Ig(t) 0 = (α ng β ng )I g (t τ)+(α nw β nw )I w (t τ) S n (t τ) h i + (α mg β mg )I g (t τ)+(α mw β mw )I w (t τ) S m (t τ) h i + (α mg γ g )P g (t τ)+(α mw γ w )P w (t τ) S m (t τ) I g (t T ), P 0 g(t) =I g (t T ) c g P g (t), P 0 w(t) =I w (t T ) c w P w (t), R 0 (t) =c g P g (t)+c w P w (t),

33 where α ng À α nw, α mg À α mw, α ng À α nw, c w À c g. We are now trying to simplify the model. However, recently C. Dye and N. Gay wrote: On a conceptual level, the next generation of SARS models may have to become yet more complex... Science.1086925, 23 May 2003.

34 data. Acknowledgment. We would like to thank Ms Foo Pek Hui of CIM for collecting