Factors of alternating sums of products of binomial and q-binomial coefficients

Similar documents
Factors of sums and alternating sums involving binomial coefficients and powers of integers

arxiv: v1 [math.nt] 28 Apr 2014

Bijective Proofs of Gould s and Rothe s Identities

Q-BINOMIALS AND THE GREATEST COMMON DIVISOR. Keith R. Slavin 8474 SW Chevy Place, Beaverton, Oregon 97008, USA.

A q-analogue of some binomial coefficient identities of Y. Sun

FLOOR AND ROOF FUNCTION ANALOGS OF THE BELL NUMBERS. H. W. Gould Department of Mathematics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA

The log-behavior of n p(n) and n p(n)/n

Proof of a conjecture of Amdeberhan and Moll on a divisibility property of binomial coefficients

A generalization of Morley s congruence

Applicable Analysis and Discrete Mathematics available online at ON JENSEN S AND RELATED COMBINATORIAL IDENTITIES

A GENERALIZATION OF THE SYMMETRY BETWEEN COMPLETE AND ELEMENTARY SYMMETRIC FUNCTIONS. Mircea Merca

CSE 1400 Applied Discrete Mathematics Number Theory and Proofs

GENERALIZED HARMONIC NUMBER IDENTITIES AND A RELATED MATRIX REPRESENTATION

In number theory we will generally be working with integers, though occasionally fractions and irrationals will come into play.

ANTI-LECTURE HALL COMPOSITIONS AND ANDREWS GENERALIZATION OF THE WATSON-WHIPPLE TRANSFORMATION

Fibonacci numbers and orthogonal polynomials

Harmonic Number Identities Via Euler s Transform

ON MONOTONICITY OF SOME COMBINATORIAL SEQUENCES

Roger Apéry's proof that zeta(3) is irrational

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 6 Jun 2018

Sequences, Mathematical Induction, and Recursion. CSE 2353 Discrete Computational Structures Spring 2018

Math 155 (Lecture 3)

Sequences of Definite Integrals, Factorials and Double Factorials

Series with Central Binomial Coefficients, Catalan Numbers, and Harmonic Numbers

62. Power series Definition 16. (Power series) Given a sequence {c n }, the series. c n x n = c 0 + c 1 x + c 2 x 2 + c 3 x 3 +

An analog of the arithmetic triangle obtained by replacing the products by the least common multiples

DIVISIBILITY PROPERTIES OF GENERALIZED FIBONACCI POLYNOMIALS

arxiv: v1 [math.nt] 10 Dec 2014

REGULARIZATION OF CERTAIN DIVERGENT SERIES OF POLYNOMIALS

De la Vallée Poussin Summability, the Combinatorial Sum 2n 1

ON THE LEHMER CONSTANT OF FINITE CYCLIC GROUPS

Math 2784 (or 2794W) University of Connecticut

Bertrand s Postulate

SOME TRIGONOMETRIC IDENTITIES RELATED TO POWERS OF COSINE AND SINE FUNCTIONS

An enumeration of flags in finite vector spaces

On a general q-identity

MATH 324 Summer 2006 Elementary Number Theory Solutions to Assignment 2 Due: Thursday July 27, 2006

Some identities involving Fibonacci, Lucas polynomials and their applications

Some p-adic congruences for p q -Catalan numbers

SOME TRIBONACCI IDENTITIES

CALCULATION OF FIBONACCI VECTORS

Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 139(2011), no. 5, BINOMIAL COEFFICIENTS AND THE RING OF p-adic INTEGERS

MAT1026 Calculus II Basic Convergence Tests for Series

A CONTINUED FRACTION EXPANSION FOR A q-tangent FUNCTION

A Simplified Binet Formula for k-generalized Fibonacci Numbers

Recurrence Relations

k-generalized FIBONACCI NUMBERS CLOSE TO THE FORM 2 a + 3 b + 5 c 1. Introduction

Some Extensions of the Prabhu-Srivastava Theorem Involving the (p, q)-gamma Function

A LIMITED ARITHMETIC ON SIMPLE CONTINUED FRACTIONS - II 1. INTRODUCTION

THE ASYMPTOTIC COMPLEXITY OF MATRIX REDUCTION OVER FINITE FIELDS

EVALUATION OF SUMS INVOLVING PRODUCTS OF GAUSSIAN q-binomial COEFFICIENTS WITH APPLICATIONS

A Note on the Symmetric Powers of the Standard Representation of S n

Super congruences concerning Bernoulli polynomials. Zhi-Hong Sun

On Divisibility concerning Binomial Coefficients

The log-concavity and log-convexity properties associated to hyperpell and hyperpell-lucas sequences

[ 11 ] z of degree 2 as both degree 2 each. The degree of a polynomial in n variables is the maximum of the degrees of its terms.

THE TRANSFORMATION MATRIX OF CHEBYSHEV IV BERNSTEIN POLYNOMIAL BASES

We are mainly going to be concerned with power series in x, such as. (x)} converges - that is, lims N n

Week 5-6: The Binomial Coefficients

1 6 = 1 6 = + Factorials and Euler s Gamma function

q-lucas polynomials and associated Rogers-Ramanujan type identities

Combinatorially Thinking

On Some Properties of Digital Roots

arxiv: v1 [math.nt] 5 Jan 2017 IBRAHIM M. ALABDULMOHSIN

WHAT ARE THE BERNOULLI NUMBERS? 1. Introduction

TEACHER CERTIFICATION STUDY GUIDE

On Generalized Fibonacci Numbers

A symbolic approach to multiple zeta values at the negative integers

Interesting Series Associated with Central Binomial Coefficients, Catalan Numbers and Harmonic Numbers

Some remarks for codes and lattices over imaginary quadratic

Enumerative & Asymptotic Combinatorics

Journal of Ramanujan Mathematical Society, Vol. 24, No. 2 (2009)

Infinite Sequences and Series

Simple proofs of Bressoud s and Schur s polynomial versions of the. Rogers-Ramanujan identities. Johann Cigler

If a subset E of R contains no open interval, is it of zero measure? For instance, is the set of irrationals in [0, 1] is of measure zero?

Infinite Series and Improper Integrals

Once we have a sequence of numbers, the next thing to do is to sum them up. Given a sequence (a n ) n=1

Comparison Study of Series Approximation. and Convergence between Chebyshev. and Legendre Series

MATH 304: MIDTERM EXAM SOLUTIONS

Determinants of order 2 and 3 were defined in Chapter 2 by the formulae (5.1)

SOME NEW IDENTITIES INVOLVING π,

Problem 4: Evaluate ( k ) by negating (actually un-negating) its upper index. Binomial coefficient

BINOMIAL PREDICTORS. + 2 j 1. Then n + 1 = The row of the binomial coefficients { ( n

Vienna, Austria α n (1 x 2 ) n (x)

Sums Involving Moments of Reciprocals of Binomial Coefficients

Zeros of Polynomials

Subject: Differential Equations & Mathematical Modeling-III

and each factor on the right is clearly greater than 1. which is a contradiction, so n must be prime.

Solutions to Math 347 Practice Problems for the final

Solutions to Problem Set 8

Mathematical Induction

Legendre-Stirling Permutations

-ORDER CONVERGENCE FOR FINDING SIMPLE ROOT OF A POLYNOMIAL EQUATION

Zhicheng Gao School of Mathematics and Statistics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada

Modern Algebra 1 Section 1 Assignment 1. Solution: We have to show that if you knock down any one domino, then it knocks down the one behind it.

MAT 271 Project: Partial Fractions for certain rational functions

Classroom. We investigate and further explore the problem of dividing x = n + m (m, n are coprime) sheep in

AMS Mathematics Subject Classification : 40A05, 40A99, 42A10. Key words and phrases : Harmonic series, Fourier series. 1.

Seunghee Ye Ma 8: Week 5 Oct 28

1. By using truth tables prove that, for all statements P and Q, the statement

Transcription:

ACTA ARITHMETICA 1271 (2007 Factors of alteratig sums of products of biomial ad q-biomial coefficiets by Victor J W Guo (Shaghai Frédéric Jouhet (Lyo ad Jiag Zeg (Lyo 1 Itroductio I 1998 Cali [4 proved that for all positive itegers m ad ( 2 1 ( 2 m (11 ( 1 + is a iteger by arithmetical techiques For m 1 2 ad 3 by the biomial theorem Kummer s formula ad Dixo s formula it is easy to see that (11 is equal to 0 1 ad ( 3 respectively Recetly i the study of fiite forms of the Rogers Ramauja idetities [7 we stumbled across (11 for m 4 ad m 5 which gives ( ( 2 + 2 + 0 2 ad j 0 ( 3 ( 2 + ( 2 2 + respectively Ideed de Bruij [3 has show that for m 4 there is o closed form for (11 by asymptotic techiques Our first objective is to give a q-aalogue of Cali s result which also implies that (11 is positive for m 2 I 2004 Zudili [14 proved that for all positive itegers j ad r ( 2 1 ( ( ( 2j ( 1 2 + 1 2 + j r (1 Z j + + 1 j which was origially observed by Strehl [12 i 1994 I fact Zudili s motivatio was to solve the followig problem which was raised by Schmidt [11 i 1993 ad was apparetly ot related to Cali s result 2000 Mathematics Subject Classificatio: 05A10 05A30 11B65 [17

18 V J W Guo et al Problem 11 (Schmidt [11 For ay iteger r 2 defie a sequece of umbers {c (r } N idepedet of the parameter by ( r ( + r ( ( + c (r 0 Is it true that all the umbers c (r are itegers? At the ed of his paper Zudili [14 raised the problem of fidig ad solvig a q-aalogue of Problem 11 Our secod objective is to provide such a q-aalogue For ay iteger defie the q-shifted factorial (a by (a 0 1 ad { (1 a(1 aq (1 aq 1 1 2 (a ((1 aq 1 (1 aq 2 (1 aq 1 1 2 0 We will also use the compact otatios for m 1: (a 1 a m : (a 1 (a m (a 1 a m : lim (a 1 a m The q-biomial coefficiets are defied as [ : [ q (q (q (q Sice 1/(q 0 if < 0 we have [ 0 if > or < 0 The followig is our first geeralizatio of Cali s result Theorem 12 For m 3 ad all positive itegers 1 m 1 (13 ( 1 q (m 12+( m i + i+1 1 i1 i + 1 + m m 2 λi 1 i+1 + q λ2 i i+2 i+1 λ i 1 where m+1 λ 0 1 ad the sum is over all sequeces λ (λ 1 λ m 2 of oegative itegers such that λ 0 λ 1 λ m 2 Cali [4 has give a partial q-aalogue of (11 by cosiderig the alteratig sum 0 ( 1 q j[ m I this respect besides (13 we shall also prove the followig divisibility result Theorem 13 For all positive itegers 1 m m+1 1 the alteratig sum 1 + 1 m 1 S( 1 m ; j q : ( 1 q j2+( m i + i+1 1 1 i1 i + is a polyomial i q with oegative itegral coefficiets for 0 j m 1 λ i1 λ i

Biomial ad q-biomial coefficiets 19 We shall give two proofs of Theorem 12 The first oe is based o a recurrece relatio formula for S( 1 m ; j q which also leads to a proof of Theorem 13 The secod oe follows directly from Adrews basic hypergeometric idetity betwee a sigle sum ad a multiple sum [1 Theorem 4: Theorem 14 (Adrews [1 For every iteger m 0 the followig idetity holds: (a q a q a b 1 c 1 b m c m q N (14 (q a a aq/b 1 aq/c 1 aq/b m aq/c m aq N+1 0 ( a m q m+n b 1 c 1 b m c m (aq aq/b mc m N (aq/b 1 c 1 l1 (aq/b m 1 c m 1 lm 1 (aq/b m aq/c m N (q l1 (q lm 1 l 1 l m 1 0 (b 2 c 2 l1 (b m c m l1 + +l m 1 (aq/b 1 aq/c 1 l1 (aq/b m 1 aq/c m 1 l1 + +l m 1 (q N l1 + +l m 1 (b m c m q N /a l1 + +l m 1 (aq lm 2+ +(m l1 q l1+ +lm 1 (b 2 c 2 l 1 (bm 1 c m 1 l 1+ +l m 2 Note that there are two igrediets i Zudili s approach to Problem 11: oe is Theorem 14 with q 1 ad the other is the Legedre trasform Now a q-legedre trasform reads: (15 a 0 q ( 2 + b b 1 q2+1 ( 1 1 q ++1 0 2 a which is a special case of Carlitz s q-gould Hsu iverse formula [5 (see also [10 Usig (15 ad Theorem 14 i its full geerality we are able to formulate ad prove a q-aalogue of Problem 11 Theorem 15 For ay iteger r 1 defie ratioal fractios c (r (q of the variable q idepedet of by writig (16 q r( 2 +(1 r( r + r 0 q ( 2 +(1 r( + c (r (q The c (r (q N[q 0 Remar Sice the r 1 case is trivial we suppose that r 2 i what follows

20 V J W Guo et al As [ that [ + [ 2 [ + ivoig (15 we derive immediately from (16 2 2j r q (1 r( c (r (q t (r j j (q j j0 where t (r j (q qr(j+1 2 [ 1 q2+1 2 ( 1 1 q ++1 [ + j j r q ( rj Therefore Theorem 15 is a cosequece of the followig theorem which is our q-aalogue of Zudili s result (1 Theorem 16 For ay iteger r 2 2j 2 1 q (r 1( t (r j (q N[q j As will be show Theorem 16 follows directly from Adrews idetity (14 This paper is orgaized as follows We prove Theorems 12 ad 13 i the ext sectio The proof of Theorem 16 is give i Sectio 3 Some iterestig divisibility results are give i Sectio 4 I the last sectio we preset four related cojectures 2 Proof of Theorems 12 ad 13 We will eed two ow idetities i q-series Oe is the q-pfaff Saalschütz idetity [6 Appedix (II1 (see also [8 13: 1 + 2 2 + 3 3 + 1 (21 1 + 2 + 3 + 1 r0 q 2 +2r (q 1 + 2 + 3 r (q r (q r+2 (q 1 r(q 2 r(q 3 r where 1/(q 0 if < 0 ad the other is the q-dixo idetity: 1 (2 ( 1 q (32 /2 1 + 2 2 + 3 3 + 1 1 + 2 + 3 + 1 A short proof of (2 is give i [9 We first establish the followig recurrece formula (q 1 + 2 + 3 (q 1 (q 2 (q 3

Biomial ad q-biomial coefficiets 21 Lemma 21 Let m 3 The for all positive itegers 1 m ad ay iteger j the followig recurrece holds: 1 1 2 + (23 S( 1 m ; j q q l2 3 S(l 3 m ; j 1 q l 2 l l0 Proof For ay iteger ad positive itegers a 1 a l let l ai + a i+1 C(a 1 a l ; a i + where a l+1 a 1 The (24 S( 1 m ; j q (q 1 (q m ( 1 q j2+( C(1 m ; (q 1 + m 1 We observe that for m 3 we have C( 1 m ; (q 2 + 3 (q m + 1 (q 1 + 2 (q m + 3 ad by lettig 3 i (21 [ 1 + 2 1 + [ 1 + 2 2 + 1 r0 i1 1 [ 1 + 2 1 + 1 + 2 C( 3 m ; 2 + q r2 +2r (q 1 + 2 (q r (q r+2 (q 1 r(q 2 r Pluggig these ito (24 we ca write its right-had side as 1 R: 1 1 r0 ( 1 C( 3 m ; q(r+2 +(j 1 2 +( (q2 + 3 (q 1 (q m (q r (q r+2 (q 1 r(q 2 r(q m + 3 Settig l r + we see that 1 l 1 but if l < 0 at least oe of the idices l + ad l is egative for ay iteger which implies that 1/(q l (q l+ 0 by covetio Therefore exchagig the order of summatio we have R 1 l0 q l2 (q 2 + 3 (q 1 (q m (q 1 l(q 2 l(q m + 3 l +( ( 1 C( 3 m ; q(j 12 (q l (q l+ l Now i the last sum maig the substitutio C( 3 m ; (q l (q l+ (q m + 3 (q 3 +l(q m +l we obtai the right-had side of (23 (25 C(l 3 m ; First proof of Theorem 12 Lettig 3 i (2 yields S( 1 2 ; 1 q 1 Theorem 12 the follows by iteratig m 2 times formula (23

22 V J W Guo et al Secod proof of Theorem 12 Sice M M (q ( 1 q (M N ( M+N N + N (q N+1 by collectig the terms of idex ad the left-had side of (13 ca be writte as m i + i+1 1 L : + (1 + q ( 1 q (m 12 +( m i + i+1 i i + i1 1 i1 m { i + i+1 1 1+ (1+q ( 1 (m 1 q (m 1(+1 2 m } q i (q i+1 i (q i+1 i1 1 Lettig c 1 c m c ad a 1 i Adrews formula (14 we get (26 1 + + q 1(1 (b 1 b m q N ( q (q/b 1 q/b m q N+1 ( 1 m m+n q m( b 1 b m (q N (q/b m N i1 l 1 l m 1 0 m 1 ( (b i+1 l1 + +l i 1 (q/b i l1 + +l i Now shiftig m to m 1 i (26 settig i1 (q N i1 (q l1 (q lm 1 (q N l1 l m 1 b i+1 l1 + +l i q (l 1 + +l i 2 +(m il i N m b i q i for i 1 m 1 ad λ i l 1 + + l i for i 1 m 2 oe sees that L equals m i + i+1 (q 2 m 2 m (q i+1 λi ( 1 λ i q (λ i +1 2 + i+1 λ i i (q 1+ m 1 m (q 1+ i λi (q λi λ i 1 0 λ 1 λ m 2 i1 1 + m 1 0 λ 1 λ m 2 m 2 i1 q λ2 i [ λi+1 λ i [ i + i+1 i + λ i where λ 0 0 ad λ m 1 m The last idetity is clearly equivalet to that i Theorem 12 I order to prove Theorem 13 we shall eed the followig relatio: (27 S( 1 m ; 0 q S( 1 m ; m 1 q 1 q 1 2 + 2 3 + + m 1 m As [ q [ q ( equatio (27 ca be verified by substitutig q by 1 q 1 ad the replacig by i the defiitio of S( 1 m ; m 1 q

Biomial ad q-biomial coefficiets 23 Proof of Theorem 13 We proceed by iductio o m 1 By the q- biomial theorem [6 Appedix (II3 we have 1 2 S( 1 ; 0 q ( 1 q ( 0 + 1 I view of (25 it follows from (27 that S( 1 2 ; 0 q S( 1 2 ; 1 q 1 q 1 2 q 1 2 So the theorem is valid for m 2 Now suppose that the expressio S( 1 m 1 ; j q is a polyomial i q with oegative itegral coefficiets for some m 3 ad 0 j m 2 The by the recurrece formula (23 so is S( 1 m ; j q for 1 j m 1 It remais to show that S( 1 m ; 0 q has the required property Sice the q-biomial coefficiet [ is a polyomial i q of degree ( (see [2 p 33 it is easy to see from the defiitio that the degree of the polyomial S( 1 m ; m 1 q is less tha or equal to 1 2 + 2 3 + + m 1 m It follows from (27 that S( 1 m ; 0 q is also a polyomial i q with oegative itegral coefficiets This completes the iductive step of the proof Remar Though it is ot ecessary to chec the m 3 case to validate our iductio argumet we thi it is coveiet to iclude here the formulas for m 3 First the q-dixo idetity (2 implies that 1 + 2 + 3 S( 1 2 3 ; 1 q From (23 ad (25 we derive 1 S( 1 2 3 ; 2 q Fially applyig (27 we get l0 q l2 [ 1 l 2 2 + 3 2 l S( 1 2 3 ; 0 q S( 1 2 3 ; 2 q 1 q 1 2 + 2 3 1 l0 [ q ( 1 l( 2 l+ 3 l 1 l [ 2 + 3 2 l 3 Proof of Theorem 16 We will distiguish the cases where r 2 is eve or odd ad treat separately the values r 2 ad r 3

24 V J W Guo et al For r 2 apply (14 specialized with m 1 a q (2+1 N j b 1 q ad c 1 q ( j The left-had side of (14 is the equal to [ + j 2j 2 q 2( j 2 +( t ( j (q Equatig this with the right-had side gives t ( j (q which shows that [ 2j j (q 2 (q 2 j (q (q 2j (q 2j (q 2 j [ 2 1q ( ( t (q N[q j q 2( j 2 ( For r 3 apply (14 specialized with m 1 a q (2+1 N j ad b 1 c 1 q ( j This yields i that case which shows that [ 2j j t (3 j (q (q 2 (q 3j (q 3 j [ 2 1q 2( (3 t (q N[q j q 3( j 2 2( For r 2s 4 apply (14 with m s 2 a q (2+1 N j b 1 q ad c 1 b i c i q ( j for all i {2 s} to get q (2s 1( 2s( j 2 t (2s j (q (q 2 (q j (q (q 2j (q j l 2 0 [ l s 1 0 [ 2j l 2 l 1 0 [ j l1 l 1 j l1 + j q (l 1 2 +2j(s 1l 1 +(j+1 l 1 l 1 j l1 l 2 + j 2 q (l 2 +2j(s l 2 +(j+1 l 2 l 1 l 2 j [ 2j l s 1 l1 l s 1 + j 2 q (l s 1 2 +2jl s 1+(j+1 l s 1 l 1 l s 1 j 2j l 1 l s 1 j q (l 1 + +l s 1 2 As the coditio l 1 + + l s 1 j holds i the last summatio we ca see that for s 2 [ 2j 2 1q (2s 1( (2s j t j (q N[q For r 2s+1 5 apply (14 with m s 2 a q (2+1 N j ad b i c i q ( j for all i {1 s} to get

q 2s( (2s+1( j Biomial ad q-biomial coefficiets 25 2 (2s+1 t j (q (q 2 2j l1 + j 2 (q 2j (q 2 q (l 1 +2j(s 1l 1 +(j+1 l 1 j l 1 l 1 j l 2 0 [ l s 1 0 [ 2j l 2 l 1 0 l1 l 2 + j 2 q (l 2 +2j(s l 2 +(j+1 l 2 l 1 l 2 j [ 2j l s 1 l1 l s 1 + j 2 q (l s 1 2 +2jl s 1+(j+1 l s 1 l 1 l s 1 j 2j l 1 l s 1 j j0 q (l 1 + +l s 1 2 As the coditio l 1 + + l s 1 j holds i the last summatio we ca see that for s 2 [ 2j 2 1q 2s( (2s+1 j t j (q N[q Remar I the special case r 2 our proof gives the followig expressio for the coefficiets c ( (q: 2j 2 (31 c ( (q q 2( j 2 j These coefficiets are q-aalogues of the famous c ( (1 ivolved i Apéry s proof of the irratioality of ζ(3: (3 c ( (1 j0 ( 2j ( 2 j j0 ( 3 j As explaied i [12 whe q 1 oe ca derive the last expressio from (31 i a elemetary way (by two iteratios of the Chu Vadermode formula But our q-aalogue (31 does ot lead to a atural q-aalogue of (3 4 Cosequeces of Theorems 12 ad 13 Lettig q 1 i Theorem 12 we obtai a direct geeralizatio of Cali s result (11 Theorem 41 For m 3 ad all positive itegers 1 m 1 m ( (41 ( 1 i + i+1 i + 1 i1 ( 1 + m m 2 ( ( λi 1 i+1 + i+2 1 λ i i+1 λ i λ i1

26 V J W Guo et al where m+1 λ 0 1 ad the sum is over all sequeces λ (λ 1 λ m 2 of oegative itegers such that λ 0 λ 1 λ m 2 Remar For m 1 ad 2 it is easy to see that the left-had side of (41 is equal to 0 ad ( 1 + 2 1 respectively Cali s result follows from (41 by settig i for all i 1 m Lettig 1 m i Theorem 13 we obtai a complete q-aalogue of Cali s result Corollary 42 For all positive m ad 0 j m 1 2 1 ( 1 q j2 +( 2 m + is a polyomial i q with oegative itegral coefficiets Lettig 2i 1 m ad 2i for 1 i r i Theorem 13 we obtai Corollary 43 For all positive m r ad 0 j 2r 1 m + 1 m ( 1 q j2 +( m + r m + r m m + + m is a polyomial i q with oegative itegral coefficiets I particular m ( m + r ( m + r ( 1 m + + m is divisible by ( m+ m Lettig 3i 2 l 3i 1 m ad 3i for 1 i r i Theorem 13 we obtai Corollary 44 For all positive l m r ad 0 j 3r 1 l + 1 l ( 1 q j2 +( l + m r m + r + l r l + m + + l is a polyomial i q with oegative itegral coefficiets I particular l ( l + m r ( m + r ( + l r ( 1 l + m + + is divisible by ( l+m l l ( m+ m ad ( +l Lettig m 2r + s 1 3 2r 1 + 1 ad all the other i be i Theorem 41 we get

Biomial ad q-biomial coefficiets 27 Corollary 45 For all positive r s ad ( 2 + 1 r ( 2 + 1 r ( 2 ( 1 + + 1 + + is divisible by both ( ( ad 2+1 ( ad is therefore divisible by (2+1 2 However the followig result is ot a special case of Theorem 41 Corollary 46 For all oegative r ad s ad positive t ad ( 2 + 1 r ( 2 + 1 s ( 2 t ( 1 + + 1 + + is divisible by ( 2 Proof We proceed by iductio o r s The r s case is clear from Corollary 45 Suppose the statemet is true for r s m 1 By Theorem 41 oe sees that ( 2 + 2 m ( 2 + 1 s ( 2 + 1 s ( 2 t (4 ( 1 + + 1 + + 1 + + 2 + 2 ( 2 + 2 m 1 ( 2 + 1 s+1 ( 2 + 1 s+1 ( 2 t 1 ( 1 2 + 1 ++1 ++1 + + where m t 1 is divisible by ( ( 2 + 2 2 + 1 2 2 2 + 1 By the biomial theorem we have ( 2 + 2 m (( ( 2 + 1 2 + 1 m (43 + + + 1 + + 1 + m ( ( m 2 + 1 i ( 2 + 1 m i i + + 1 + i0 Substitutig (43 ito the left-had side of (4 ad usig the iductio hypothesis ad symmetry we fid that ( 2 + 1 m+s ( 2 + 1 s ( 2 t ( 1 + + 1 + + ( 2 + 1 s ( 2 + 1 m+s ( 2 t + ( 1 + + 1 + + s

28 V J W Guo et al is divisible by 2 ( 2 However replacig by oe sees that ( 2 + 1 m+s ( 2 + 1 s ( 2 t ( 1 + + 1 + + ( 2 + 1 s ( 2 + 1 m+s ( 2 t ( 1 + + 1 + + This proves that the statemet is true for r s m It is clear that Theorems 13 ad 41 ca be restated i the followig forms Theorem 47 For all positive itegers 1 m ad 0 j m 1 the alteratig sum m (q i + (q i+1 1 1 ( 1 q j2+( m 2i (q i1 2i 1 i1 i + where m+1 0 is a polyomial i q with oegative itegral coefficiets Theorem 48 For all positive itegers 1 m we have m ( i + i+1! 1 m ( 1! ( 1 2i N (2 i! i + i1 1 i1 where m+1 0 It is easy to see that for all positive itegers m ad the expressio (2m!(!/(m +!m!! is a iteger by cosiderig the power of a prime dividig a factorial Lettig 1 r m ad r+1 r+s i Theorem 48 we obtai Corollary 49 For all positive m r ad s m ( 2m r ( 2 ( 1 m + + m is divisible by (2m!(!/(m +!m!! I particular we fid that ( 4 r ( 2 ( 1 2 + + is divisible by ( 4 ad is divisible by (6!(!/(4!(3!! ( 6 r ( 2 ( 1 3 + + s s s

Biomial ad q-biomial coefficiets 29 From Theorem 48 it is easy to see that m ( i + i+1! 1 m ( ri 1! ( 1 2i (2 i! i + i1 1 i1 where m+1 0 is a oegative iteger for all r 1 r m 1 For m 3 lettig ( 1 2 3 be ( 3 (2 3 or (2 4 we obtai the followig two corollaries Corollary 410 For all positive r s t ad ( 6 r ( 4 s ( 2 ( 1 3 + 2 + + is divisible by both ( ( 6 ad 6 3 Corollary 411 For all positive r s t ad ( 8 r ( 4 s ( 2 ( 1 4 + 2 + + is divisible by ( 8 3 5 Some ope problems Based o computer experimets we would lie to preset four iterestig cojectures The first two are refiemets of Corollaries 410 ad 411 respectively Cojecture 51 For all positive r s t ad ( 6 r ( 4 s ( 2 t ( 1 3 + 2 + + is divisible by both 2 ( 6 ( ad 6 6 3 Cojecture 52 For all positive r s t ad with (r s t (1 1 1 ( 8 r ( 4 s ( 2 t ( 1 4 + 2 + + is divisible by 2 ( 8 3 Cojectures 51 ad 52 are true for r + s + t 10 ad 100 Let gcd(a 1 a 2 deote the greatest commo divisor of itegers a 1 a 2 Cojecture 53 For all positive m ad we have ( ( 2 r (51 gcd ( 1 r m m + 1 + t t ( 2

30 V J W Guo et al Let d 2 be a fixed iteger Every oegative iteger ca be uiquely writte as i 0 a i d i where 0 a i d 1 for all i ad oly fiitely may umbers of b i are ozero deoted by [ a 1 a 0 d i which the first 0 s are omitted Let [a 1 a r 3 [b 1 b s 7 [c 1 c t 13 We ow defie three statistics α( β( ad γ( as follows: Let α( be the umber of discoected 2 s i the sequece a 1 a r Here two ozero digits a i ad a j are said to be discoected if there is at least oe 0 betwee a i ad a j Let β( be the umber of 1 s i b 1 b s which are ot immediately followed by a 4 5 or 6 Let γ( be the umber of 1 s i c 1 c t which are immediately followed by oe of 7 12 or immediately followed by a umber of 6 s ad the by oe of 7 12 For istace [20212 3 185 ad so α(185 2; [10142 7 2480 ad so β(2480 1; [1667 13 3296 ad so γ(3296 1 The first such that α( 4 is [2020202 3 1640; the first such that β( 4 is [1111 7 400; while the first such that γ( 4 is [17171717 13 97110800 We ed this paper with the followig cojecture Cojecture 54 For every positive iteger ( ( 2 3r gcd ( 1 r 1 2 + ( ( 2 3r+1 gcd ( 1 r 1 2 + ( ( 2 3r+2 gcd ( 1 r 1 2 + ( 2 3 α( ( 2 7 β( 13 γ( ( 2 Acowledgmets This wor was partially doe durig the first author s visit to Istitut Camille Jorda Uiversité Claude Berard (Lyo 1 ad was supported by a Frech postdoctoral fellowship We tha Christia Krattethaler for coveyig us his feelig that Theorem 12 should follow from Adrews formula [1 Theorem 4 We also tha Wadim Zudili for useful coversatios durig his visit i Lyo Fially the first author is grateful to Hog-Xig Dig for helpful commets o Cojecture 52

Biomial ad q-biomial coefficiets 31 Refereces [1 G E Adrews Problems ad prospects for basic hypergeometric fuctios i: Theory ad Applicatio of Special Fuctios R A Asey (ed Math Res Ceter Uiv of Wiscosi Publ No 35 Academic Press New Yor 1975 191 224 [2 The Theory of Partitios Cambridge Uiv Press Cambridge 1998 [3 N G de Bruij Asymptotic Methods i Aalysis Dover New Yor 1981 [4 N J Cali Factors of sums of powers of biomial coefficiets Acta Arith 86 (1998 17 26 [5 L Carlitz Some iverse relatios Due Math J 40 (1973 893 901 [6 G Gasper ad M Rahma Basic Hypergeometric Series 2d ed Ecyclopedia Math Appl 96 Cambridge Uiv Press Cambridge 2004 [7 V J W Guo F Jouhet ad J Zeg New fiite Rogers Ramauja idetities preprit 2006 arxiv: mathco/0604407 [8 V J W Guo ad J Zeg A combiatorial proof of a symmetric q-pfaff Saalschütz idetity Electro J Combi 12 (2005 #N2 [9 A short proof of the q-dixo idetity Discrete Math 296 (2005 259 261 [10 C Krattethaler A ew matrix iverse Proc Amer Math Soc 124 (1996 47 59 [11 A L Schmidt Geeralized q-legedre polyomials J Comput Appl Math 49 (1993 243 249 [12 V Strehl Biomial idetities combiatorial ad algorithmical aspects Discrete Math 136 (1994 309 346 [13 D Zeilberger A q-foata proof of the q-saalschütz idetity Europea J Combi 8 (1987 461 463 [14 W Zudili O a combiatorial problem of Asmus Schmidt Electro J Combi 11 (2004 #R22 Departmet of Mathematics East Chia Normal Uiversity Shaghai 200062 People s Republic of Chia E-mail: jwguo@mathecueduc http://mathecueduc/ jwguo Istitut Camille Jorda Uiversité Lyo 1 Bâtimet du Doye Jea Bracoier 43 blvd du 11 ovembre 1918 F-69622 Villeurbae Cedex Frace E-mail: jouhet@mathuiv-lyo1fr http://mathuiv-lyo1fr/ jouhet zeg@mathuiv-lyo1fr http://mathuiv-lyo1fr/ zeg Received o 22122005 (5110