ERRATA for PE Civil Structural Practice Exam ISBN Copyright 2014 (July 2016 Second Printing) Errata posted

Similar documents
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON Department of Civil Engineering

(Round up to the nearest inch.)

MAXIMUM SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM ASD LOADS, psf SINGLE SPAN DOUBLE SPAN TRIPLE SPAN GAGE

A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Local Buckling. Local Buckling in Columns. Buckling is not to be viewed only as failure of the entire member

Example Stayed beam with two pylons

Appendix K Design Examples

Unbraced Column Verification Example. AISC Design Examples AISC 13 th Edition. ASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at

Lecture Example. Steel Deck (info from Vulcraft Steel Roof and Floor Deck Manual)

TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES)

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.

AISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

DNV DESIGN. POU_Rect - Design Report Page 1 of 11

Singly Symmetric Combination Section Crane Girder Design Aids. Patrick C. Johnson

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas

A.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications

Suspended Beam Roof with Pylons

It s a bird it s a plane it s Super Table! F y = 50 ksi F u = 65 ksi ASD LRFD ASD LRFD

3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties

Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy

2/23/ WIND PRESSURE FORMULA 2. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE STRESS 3. FATIGUE DESIGN

Appendix J. Example of Proposed Changes

Introduction. ENCE 710 Design of Steel Structures IV. COMPOSITE STEEL-CONCRET CONSTRUCTION. Effective Width. Composite Action

SHEAR CONNECTION: DESIGN OF W-SHAPE BEAM TO RECTANGULAR/SQUARE HSS COLUMN SHEAR PLATE CONNECTION

2010 NASCC / Structures Congress Orlando, Florida May 13, 2010

Beam Design and Deflections

twenty steel construction: columns & tension members ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2013 lecture

Biaxial Analysis of General Shaped Base Plates

Serviceability Deflection calculation

FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS

Interaction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements

3.4 Reinforced Concrete Beams - Size Selection

NYIT Instructors: Alfred Sanabria and Rodrigo Suarez

In-class Exercise. Problem: Select load factors for the Strength I and Service I Limit States for the. Loading Diagram for Student Exercise

Torsional Analysis of

Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003

Reports RESEARCH REPORT RP00-3 RESEARCH REPORT RP01-1 OCTOBER REVISION 2006 REVISION

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads

Flitched Beams. Strain Compatibility. Architecture 544 Wood Structures. Strain Compatibility Transformed Sections Flitched Beams

host structure (S.F.D.)

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge

Stress Transformation Equations: u = +135 (Fig. a) s x = 80 MPa s y = 0 t xy = 45 MPa. we obtain, cos u + t xy sin 2u. s x = s x + s y.

Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on Exam 3.

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT

3.5 Analysis of Members under Flexure (Part IV)

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

Steel Design. Notation:

FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges

Steel Design. Notation:

APRIL Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications. Topics covered in this month s column:

Design 1 Calculations

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams

CivilBay Crane Load and Crane Runway Beam Design v1.0.0 User Manual

DESIGN OF BEAMS AND SHAFTS

CHAPTER II EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION

THROUGH PLATE-TO-ROUND HSS CONNECTIONS

research report Design Example for Analytical Modeling of a Curtainwall and Considering the Effects of Bridging (All-Steel Design Approach)

SHEAR CONNECTION: W BEAM WITH SHEAR PLATE ONE-WAY SHEAR CONNECTION TO W COLUMN WEB

Steel Design. Notation: a A A b A e

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

DL CMU wall = 51.0 (lb/ft 2 ) 0.7 (ft) DL beam = 2.5 (lb/ft 2 ) 18.0 (ft) 5

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections


Towards The. Design of Super Columns. Prof. AbdulQader Najmi

4.3 Moment Magnification

RETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil)

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS

Preferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order:

DES140: Designing for Lateral-Torsional Stability in Wood Members

Sway Column Example. PCA Notes on ACI 318

Direct Design and Indirect Design of Concrete Pipe Part 2 Josh Beakley March 2011

Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

Properties of Sections

County: Any Design: BRG Date: 9/2007 Hwy: Any Ck Dsn: BRG Date: 9/2007. For prestr. beams, assume 12" top flange, therefore take 4" from CL Gird.

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0.

NICE-PACK ALCOHOL PREP ROOM PLATFORM CALCULATIONS

Software Verification

5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown?

UC Berkeley CE 123 Fall 2017 Instructor: Alan Kren

Huntly Christie 1/26/2018 Christie Lites 100 Carson Street Toronto, ON M8W3R9

Composite Beams DYB 654: ADVANCED STEEL STRUCTURES - II. Department of Earthquake and

of I Section Members

Chapter Objectives. Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads

CIV 207 Winter For practice

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING SECTION: STEEL ROOF DECKING REPORT HOLDER: NEW MILLENNIUM BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC

COLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS)

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.

Design of Shear Tab Connections for Gravity and Seismic Loads

Trusted SECTION: POST COLUMBIA, PANELS. Conformity! ICC-ES Evaluation. Copyright 2015

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of

Transcription:

Errata posted 8-16-2017 Revisions are shown in red. Question 521, p. 47: Question 521 should read as follows: 521. The W10 22 steel eam (Fy = 50 ksi) shown in the figure is only raced at the center of span. Work either the ASD or the LRFD version of the question, considering the most conservative instance. ASD The allowale flexural strength (ft-kips) of the eam is most nearly: (A) 45 (B) 51 (C) 56 (D) 65 LRFD The design moment capacity Mn (ft-kips) of the eam is most nearly: (A) 68 (B) 76 (C) 84 (D) 97

Errata posted 8-16-2017 Solution 521, p. 96: Solution 521 should read as follows: 521. The properties of a W10 22 are as follows: AISC, 14th ed., Tale 3-2. M x 97.5 ft-kips p p p M x/ω 64.9 ft-kips BF/Ω 2.68 kips (ASD) or BF 4.02 kips (LRFD) L L 4.7 ft 10 ft ASD: M x/ω BF(L L ) M /Ω p p n 64.9 2.68(10 4.7) 50.7 ft-kips LRFD: M x BF(L L ) M p p n 97.5 4.02(10 4.7) 76.2 ft-kips THE CORRECT ANSWER IS: (B) Previously posted errata continued on next page

Errata posted 5-23-2017 Revisions are shown in red. Solution 533, p. 96: Line 4 should read as follows: Allowale load 2( 13)(0.79) 21.2 kips Previously posted errata continued on next page

Revisions are shown in red. Question 509, p. 38: Question 509 should read as follows: A doule-tee supported y an L-eam is loaded as shown in the figure. Design Code: ACI 318: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, 2011. The magnitude of the ultimate torsion (ft-kips) induced into the L-eam, y superimposed dead and live load applied on the doule-tee, is most nearly: (A) 18.7 (B) 21.4 (C) 28.6 (D) 32.8

Solution 509, p. 87: Solution 509 should read as follows: 15.5 in. 6 in. 9.5 in. u/dt W 1.2(10 psf ) 1.6(50 psf ) 15 ft 1,380 plf R 1 u/dt (1.38 klf )(60 ft) 41.4 kips 2 9.5 in. Tu 41.4 kips 32.8 ft-kips 12 in./ft THE CORRECT ANSWER IS: (D) Question 513, p. 41: Question 513 should read as follows: The pipe memer shown in the figure has a constant section and the following properties: Outside diameter 10 in. Moment of inertia 90 in 4 Area 7 in 2 Neglecting the weight of the pipe, the maximum compressive stress (ksi) at the support is most nearly: (A) 2.9 (B) 4.9 (C) 13.3 (D) 16.2

Solution 513, p. 88: Solution 513 should read as follows: M N S S 20 kips 12 in. 5 in. 140 in.-kips 20 kips (140 in.-kips)(5 in.) Top tension flexure 7.8 ksi 4 90 in Bottom compression 20 kips axial 2.9 ksi tension 7 in2 Max compressive stress (at ottom): 7.8 ksi 2.9 ksi 4.9 ksi THE CORRECT ANSWER IS: (B) Solution 520, p. 91: Line 2 should read as follows: Two or more spans not exceeding 10 ft

Question 528, p. 52: Question 528 should read as follows: A connection is shown in the figure. Design Code: AISC: Steel Construction Manual, 14th edition. Material: A36 steel Assumptions: The olt is sufficient. The concrete is sufficient. The load P is equally distriuted along the entire 6-in.-long angle. The maximum load P (ASD) or Pn (LRFD) in kips that can e carried y the angle is most nearly: ASD LRFD (A) 0.8 1.2 (B) 1.1 1.7 (C) 1.2 1.8 (D) 2.0 2.0

Solution 528, p. 94: Solution 528 should read as follows: By inspection P controls. M M F Z 1.6 M F y n p y x y 36 ksi y y x p y x p 2 2 3 Sx 1/6 d 1/6 (6)(0.375) 0.141 in M F S (36)(0.141) 5.076 in.-kips 2 2 3 Zx 1/4 d 1/4 (6)(0.375) 0.211 in M F Z (36)(0.211) 7. 6 in.-kips governs Check M 1.6 M 1.6 5.076 8.1 7. 6 OK AISC ASD: M n / 7.6/1.67 4.55 in.-kips Pallow 4.55 1.19 1.2 4 1 23 8 AISC LRFD: M n 0.9(7.6) 6.84 in.-kips P 6.84 n 1.79 1.8 4 1 23 8 THE CORRECT ANSWER IS: (C) y Previously posted errata continued on next page

Copyright 2014 (Octoer 2014 First Printing) Errata posted 5-7-2015 Revisions are shown in red. Solution 538, p. 98: Solution 538 should read as follows: Reference: AASHTO Section 9.7.2.3. AASHTO prescriptively calls out to add ack a single flange overhang (not one on each side). L eff = 8.5 ft f + flange overhang = 8.5 ft 1.5 ft + 0.25 ft = 7.25 ft (7 ft 3in.) THE CORRECT ANSWER IS: (C)