Module Accelerated Stress Testing and Prediction of Field Performance SNEC 11th (2017) International Photovoltaic Power Generation Conference & Exhibition April 19, 2017 William Gambogi, Thomas Felder, Bao-Ling Yu, and T. John Trout, DuPont Photovoltaic Solutions, Wilmington, DE, USA Hongjie Hu and Zhen Pan, DuPont (China) Research & Development and Management Co., Ltd., Shanghai, P.R.C For over 40 years our material innovations have led the photovoltaics industry forward, and helped our clients transform the power of the Sun into power for us all. Today we offer a portfolio of solutions that deliver proven power and lasting value over the long term. Whatever your material needs, you can count on quality DuPont Photovoltaic Solutions to deliver the performance, efficiency and value you require, day after day after day
Outline Introduction Field Examples Key Stress Conditions in the Field Accelerated Stress Conditions and their Relation to Field Conclusions 2
Introduction IEC qualification test conditions were developed to identify early life failures due to poor component selection, manufacturing process and/or module design Extended IEC qualification testing (2x or 3x DH, TC, HF) does not predict long term performance New accelerated test methodologies need to be developed to accurately predict long term performance and adequately assess changes to materials, module design and processing 3
Global Concerns of PV Module Field Failures Defects of PV modules in the field are not uncommon, with most of these defective modules using non field-proven materials. Defects are seen even among systems in use less than five years. Field study results: DuPont 2016 Field Study TUV Rheinland 2015 Study Cell 11.3% Backsheet 7.5% Encapsulant 2.7% Other 0.5% No defect 78.0% 22% of global modules have shown visual defects 1 Backsheet defects = 7.5% PV module defects increased from 19% in 2013 to 48% in 2015 2 Backsheet defects = Particularly Serious 1 From a global field-module survey including more than 70 global installations, (1,9 MM+ modules at 450+ MW) in NA, EU and AP. 2 TUV Rheinland Intersolar 2015, Roundtable Solarpraxis 4
27 26.1 25.9 26.4 25.8 25.5 24.9 25.6 26.4 26 26.2 26.8 24.8 25.2 25.8 25.4 25.8 26.3 25.6 25.5 25.6 25.8 25.5 25.7 24.5 25.3 26.1 24.9 25.2 25.8 26.3 25.6 25.2 25.7 25.1 24.6 26.5 25.8 25.7 26.2 25.5 25.1 24.8 25.2 25.9 25.5 25.7 26.5 23.9 24 25.1 24.3 23.9 25 25.6 25.1 25.8 26.2 25.7 25.3 23.9 24.9 25.8 20.2 23 25.3 26.2 25.3 25 25.6 24.5 24.3 26 24.8 24.7 24.9 24.8 24.1 24.5 25.2 24.7 26.2 22.9 23.4 24.1 22.8 24.5 26 25.3 26.1 25.3 25.3 23.3 23.1 24 20.6 23 25.2 24.4 24.3 24.8 24.3 26.1 24.9 24.5 24.8 24.4 24.4 24 24.3 25.1 24.9 24.7 25.9 22.5 22.7 23.7 22.8 23 24.2 25.7 25.2 26 25.5 25.5 25.2 23.9 23.9 24.7 23.5 22.9 24.2 24.6 24.2 24.3 25.8 25 24.6 24.2 22.7 22.5 22.9 22.4 22.4 21.9 22.4 23.4 22.4 22.6 23.6 19.9 19.9 21.2 20 19.6 21.4 24.3 23.8 24.2 23.6 24 23.5 21.9 22 23.2 22 21.1 22.5 22.8 22.6 23.1 24.9 24.7 24.2 23.4 20.9 19.8 20.3 19.7 21.1 20.3 19.7 20.8 19.6 20.9 23.1 18.6 16.4 17.8 16.8 17.6 20.8 23.4 20.7 20.4 19.7 20.1 21.2 21.8 20.7 21 20.1 19.4 22 21.9 20.3 21.7 24.7 24.7 24.3 23.1 20.4 18.6 19.2 18.4 20.6 19.5 18.5 19.4 18.6 20.1 21.9 18.3 14.8 16 14.6 16.6 20.2 22.9 19.7 18.6 17.9 18.4 20.3 21.6 20.1 20 18.1 18.6 21.3 21.4 19.6 20.8 24.8 24.6 24.3 21.3 19.2 17.6 18.9 17.5 18.8 16.7 16.6 18 16.7 17.8 19.3 15.9 13.7 15 13.4 14.4 17.7 20.7 18.3 17.7 17.3 17.7 18.6 18.9 18.6 19 17.2 17.3 19.7 19.8 18.5 19.7 23.6 24.3 24.2 23.3 20.9 19.2 19.7 19 20.9 18.4 18.4 19.4 18.4 19.2 21 17.3 13.9 15.4 13.8 15.2 19.2 21.9 19.2 18.2 18 17.9 20.3 20.6 19.5 19.3 17.6 18.1 20.9 20.7 19.1 20.2 24 24.5 24.6 21 20 20.3 17 18.1 19.9 18.1 18.3 19.1 17.3 19.5 21.1 18.5 15.9 17.1 15.5 16.6 20.3 18.4 16.7 17.6 14.5 15.1 18.3 22 19.7 18.3 17.9 18.8 20.1 20 18.6 17.4 25 24.9 24.9 18.7 18.3 18.5 16.1 15.5 17.4 15.9 16.4 17.8 16 16.1 18.4 17.3 14.6 17 15 14.5 17.4 16.6 15.4 17.1 14.2 13.1 15.2 20.3 18.4 16.8 17.2 17.4 17.2 19.1 17.8 19.4 23.5 24.1 24.3 20.4 19.2 18.8 16.5 19.7 18.4 17.4 18.5 19 21.4 18.7 15.6 17.4 16.7 20.6 18.5 16.3 17.7 14.2 18.1 22.2 19.6 17.8 18.6 20.8 20.4 18.8 20.6 24.7 25 20.9 20.2 20.2 18.8 18.5 20.6 19.4 19.3 20 19.2 20.2 22.2 19.7 18 19.2 18.5 18.3 21.4 19.3 18.5 19.5 17.5 17.3 19.6 22.8 21.1 19.7 20.2 20.5 21.6 21.2 20 21.2 24.6 24.8 24.6 21.1 21.5 21.7 21.2 20.4 21.5 21.1 21.6 22.1 21.3 21.4 22.4 20.7 20.9 21.9 21.1 20.6 21.9 20.3 20.9 21.9 20.8 19.8 21.1 22.8 22.6 22.2 22.5 22.6 22.4 22.2 22 22.7 24.3 24.4 24.7 23.5 23.6 24.3 23.6 23.1 24.4 23.3 23.5 24.4 23.6 23.6 24.6 23.2 23.3 24.1 23.6 23.1 24.5 23.1 23.1 24.2 23.4 22.9 23.9 24.7 23.9 24.5 24.7 24.5 24.3 24.2 23.8 24 25.2 24.6 24.4 24.4 24.5 25.4 24.8 24.7 25.4 24 24.3 25.5 24.8 24.9 25.5 24.3 24.7 25.5 25.1 24.6 25.4 24 24.3 25.4 24.5 24.4 25.1 25 23.7 24.6 24.9 24.8 24.6 25.2 24.7 24.4 25.4 24.4 24.4 24.7 24.9 25.8 25.5 25.3 25.7 24.6 24.9 25.6 25.6 25.4 26 24.8 25.2 26.2 25.8 25.7 26.1 24.6 25.1 26 25.4 25.4 26 24.7 24 24.3 24.5 24.6 24 26 25.3 25.1 25.3 24.6 24.1 25 25.7 26.5 26.7 26.3 26.5 25.4 25.6 26.3 26.3 26.2 26.6 25.1 25.7 26.3 26.3 26.5 26.8 25.6 25.9 27 26.5 26.7 26.9 26 25.4 25.9 26 25.6 24.9 26.6 26.1 25.7 26.1 25.3 25.2 Field Examples of Backsheet Inner Layer Yellowing Backsheet Yellowing on Sun-side 2 year old fielded module in a desert region in USA- PVDF-based backsheet 9 year old fielded module in Tibet-PET-based backsheet-100% modules yellowed in 10kW field Field examples of Backsheet Outer Layer Yellowing A-Up6 A-Up5 A-Up4 A-Up3 A-Up2 A-Up1 Max 27.0 24.2 21.4 18.7 15.9 13.1 Min b* value High Low PET-based Backsheets A-Down6 A-Down5 A-Down4 A-Down3 Yellowness measured on 12 rooftop modules deployed 15 years in Japan. Significant yellowing even on the interior of array (b* of 13-20) Highest yellowing is along edges with highest UV exposure (b* up to 27) A-Down2 A-Down1 Detail of module from the installation shown on left Source: Modules provided by AIST; DuPont analysis 5
Field Examples of Backsheet Outer Layer Cracking 4 years old module from Spain- 2.3 MW field, 2 module types, large percentage affected-pa backsheet 5 year old module from Italy large crack tripped inverter- PA backsheet 9 year old module from Canada large crack in PET-based backsheet Remains of backsheet 4 year old module from Canada- four 10 kw installations, 57% of modules affected- PVDF backsheet 4 year old module from Canada with backsheet in advanced state of degradation- PVDF backsheet 6
Key Stress Conditions in the Field PID and corrosion 7
Key Stress Conditions in the Field Direct UV/visible light exposure New encapsulants transmit more UV to the backsheet inner layer Higher UV stability for backsheet needed High temperature and thermal cycling exposure Closed roof mounting Localized heating from shading and hot spots Mechanical stress exposure Snow, wind, etc. Installation and mount-related stress Localized stress from cell edges, busbarribbons, tabbing wires Reflected UV/visible light exposure UV exposure of the backsheet outer layer from ground (albedo) Roof, water, ground cover depending on installation Mechanical abrasion Sandstorms Installation Internal voltage stress Potential-induced degradation (PID) and corrosion Heat generated from resistive losses 8
Accelerated Conditions and their Relation to Field Accelerated testing protocols attempt to recreate stress conditions in the field at higher stress levels including higher temperature higher humidity higher irradiation intensity larger temperature range faster temperature variation in order to identify field-related failures and eliminate the cause Simultaneous and sequential exposure of these accelerated stress conditions allows better prediction of synergistic effects 9
Module Accelerated Sequential Testing (MAST) Thermal Cycling Thermal Cycling Thermal Cycling 1000 hours 1000 hours 200X 200X 200X 1000 hours 1000 hours 1000 hours Damp Heat UVA UVA UVA UVA 1000 Hours in a Humidity Chamber Amounts to > 25+ years worth of stress 600 Thermal Stress Cycles Mimics thermal stresses seen in the field 4000 Hours in a UVA Chamber Amounts to 24 years worth of UV stress Repeated sequential stress mimics field degradation not detected by single tests and current industry standards. Sequential exposures are applied to same module. 10
Sequential Test Results Compared to Field Results DH 85C/85%RH UVA 1.2W/sqm (340nnm), 70C BPT TC 85 o C <=> -40 o C per IEC 61215 MAST Sequential Accelerated Test Polyamide backsheet - cracking PVDF backsheet - cracking PET backsheet-yellowing Field Examples Polyamide backsheet - cracked, 5 years in Spain PVDF backsheet Cracked, 5 years in Canada PET backsheet- Yellowing, 15 years in Japan 11
MAST Alternative Testing Sequences Damp Heat & Thermal Cycling Combines two important stress factors in a shorter test not requiring full size, expensive UV equipment. UVA & Water Simulation Combines UV and rainfall simulation, common weathering test conditions using commercially available weatherometer. DH/TC exposure to assess backsheet cracking in full size modules. ASTM G155 or SAE J1960 protocols in a weatherometer for backsheet coupon or minimodule 12
Results of Alternative Sequential Test Sequential Accelerated Test Cracks with Polyamide based backsheet Cracks with single-sided PVDF backsheet Field Examples Polyamide backsheet - cracked, 5 years in Spain Cracked and degraded 1s PVDF backsheet <5 years in the field 13
Weathering Test Results Sequential Accelerated Test Yellowing in PET-based Backsheets Loss of Mechanical Properties in PET-based Backsheets Field Examples 15 year rooftop- yellowed PET backsheet 9 year ground mount- cracked PET backsheet 14
Comparison of Sequential Accelerated Test Results Sequential Test Summary Test Sequence Measurement Format Unit Tedlar PVF TPT Tedlar PVDF FEVE PVDF FEVE Nylon PVF TPE UVPET / HPET (Hydroliticallystabilized) UVPET / PET (Standard) 1 UVA1000-DH1000 2X(TC200-UVA1000) Yellowing Full size module, Minimodule or backsheet samples b* 0.8 OK 0.6 0.2 0.6 3.1 3.7 4.1 Mechanical Loss- Cracking Full size module, Minimodule or backsheet samples observe or % elongation loss OK Micro Cracking OK Cracking 45 Cracking 50-100 100 2 DH1000 2X TC200 Mechanical Loss- Cracking Mini module observe OK OK OK Cracking Cracking OK OK 3 UVX-water spray-3000 hours Yellowing Mechanical Loss- Elongation Minimodule or Backsheet Minimodule or Backsheet b* 0.1 0.2 0 4.7 0.8 6.4 % Elongation Loss 0 0 0 50 10-100 80-100 Outdoor Performance Field Years in Field Years 34 4 4 26 7 9 7 6 19 Yellowing Modules OK OK 3-10 3-20 Cracking Modules OK OK Cracking Cracking Cracking Cracking Cracking Good correlation of sequential test results and field defects 15
Conclusions Fielded module defects are commonly seen, recent surveys show increasing levels of defects often due to untested newer materials Backsheet defects include frontside yellowing and airside yellowing and cracking-yellowing is an indication of polymer degradation Sequential tests have been developed that match field exposure levels and reveal defects better than single stress exposures Three sequential test conditions have been identified for module testing, examples provided showing good predictability of field defects Shorter test time with better prediction are the goals of current accelerated test activities 16
photovoltaics.dupont.com Copyright 2017 DuPont. All rights reserved. The DuPont Oval Logo, DuPont, The miracles of science, Materials Matter, and all products denoted with or are registered trademarks or trademarks of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company or its affiliates. 17