Identification of Getter Defects in high-energy self-implanted Silicon at Rp R. Krause-Rehberg 1, F. Börner 1, F. Redmann 1, J. Gebauer 1, R. Kögler 2, R. Kliemann 2, W. Skorupa 2, W. Egger 3, G. Kögel 3, W. Triftshäuser 3 Martin- Luther- Universität 1 Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg 2 Forschungszentrum Rossendorf, Dresden 3 Universität der Bundeswehr München Halle- Wittenberg Introduction: The effect in Si Study using depth-resolution enhanced Positron Beams Conclusions
Defects in high-energy self-implanted Si The effect after high-energy (3.5 MeV) self-implantation of Si (5 10 15 cm -2 ) and RTA annealing (900 C, 30s): two new gettering zones appear at and ( = projected range of Si + ) visible by SIMS profiling after intentional Cu contamination Cu concentration (cm -3 ) 10 17 10 16 TEM image by P. Werner, MPI Halle 10 15 0 1 2 3 4 Depth (µm) SIMS at : gettering by interstitial-type dislocation loops (formed by excess interstitials during RTA) no defects visible by TEM at What type are these defects? Interstitial type [3,4] Vacancy type [1,2] [1] R. A. Brown, et al., J. Appl. Phys. 84 (1998) 2459 [2] J. Xu, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74 (1999) 997 [3] R. Kögler, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75 (1999) 1279 [4] A. Peeva, et al., NIM B 161 (2000) 1090
Conventional positron beam technique positron annihilation successful in characterization of open-volume defects positron beam of mono-energetic positrons positron implantation depth varied by accelerating voltage magnetically guided positron beam system at Univ. Halle
Investigation of the effect by conventional VEPAS 1.00 0 10 Positron energy (kev) 15 20 25 30 35 40 the defect layers are expected in a depth of 1.7 µm and 2.8 µm corresponding to E + = 18 and 25 kev implantation profile too broad to discriminate between the two zones simulation of S(E) curve gives the same result for assumed blue and yellow defect profile (solid line in upper panel) furthermore: small effect only no conclusions about origin of effect possible bulk S/S defect density (cm -3 ) P(z,E) 0.98 0.96 0.94 1 10 1 10 18 17 0.02 0.01 0.00 5 kev 18 kev 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Depth ( µ m) reference implanted and annealed + Cu 25 kev
Getter centers after high-energy self-implantation in Si Cu density (cm -3 ) W/W ref at 7.5 kev surface 1,15 1,10 1,05 1,00 0,95 10 17 10 16 TEM Positron Annihilation SIMS 1,015 1,010 1,005 1,000 0,995 S/S ref at 10 kev S/S ref VEPAS with improved depth resolution shows clearly open-volume defects at and they must be different (see S-W-plot) normal behavior of W parameter at but high value at : Cu decorates the vacancy-type defect 1.015 1.010 1.005 1.000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Depth (µm) surface running parameter: depth bulk 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 W/W ref 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Depth (µm)
Doppler-coincidence and lifetime spectroscopy Difference to bulk Si (a.u.) 20 0-20 -40-60 600 400 200 0 Doppler-coincidence spectroscopy shows the existence of Cu at the defect positron lifetime spectroscopy needed for determination of open volume size p L (10-3 m 0 c) 0 8 16 24 32 RTA-annealed + Cu contaminated RTA-annealed as-implanted Cu 0 2 4 6 8 γ energy (difference to 511 kev) samples were chemically etched and positron lifetime was measured at Munich Slow-Positron Lifetime Beam System at : τ d =450 ps (vacancy cluster, n > 10) at : τ d =320 ps (open volume = divacancy) Intensity (%) τ def (ps) 100 80 60 450 400 350 300 250 τ bulk after annealing Cu contaminated 200 0 1 2 3 4 Depth (µm) Conclusions : small vacancy clusters are getter centers : positrons are trapped by defects at dislocation loops
Further proof: additional implantation into region experiment: - high-energy self-implantation (Si + energy:3.5 MeV) - RTA annealing (30s @ 900 C) - Cu contamination and diffusion normal effect - additional Si+ implantation into depth of 1.7 µm ( region) - sample etched by 1.2 µm to obtain optimum depth resolution for positrons - decrease of S parameter: open volume shrinks vacancy clusters at partly filled by Si interstitials of post-implantation S/S bulk 1,02 1,01 1,00 0,99 0,98 0,97 0,96 additional implantation: no 2E14 cm -2 4E14 cm -2 6E14 cm -2 Fz Si-Referenz 0 10 20 30 40 Positron energy (kev)
Enhanced depth resolution by using the Munich Scanning Positron Microscope defect depth 10 µ m α = 0.6 positron microbeam E = 8 kev scan direction lateral resolution 1... 2 µ m sample is wedge-shaped polished (0.5 2 ) grinding does not affect the defect detection in a depth of 500 nm (proved by reference experiment with defect-free sample) positron lifetime (ps) τ defect τ bulk 0 1 mm scan width
First defect depth profile using Positron Microscopy 45 lifetime spectra: scan along wedge separation of 11 µm between two measurements corresponds to depth difference of 155 nm (α = 0.81 ) beam energy of 8 kev mean penetration depth is about 400 nm; represents optimum depth resolution no improvement possible due to positron diffusion: L + (Si @ 300K) 230 nm both regions well visible: vacancy clusters with increasing density down to 2 µm ( region) in region: lifetime τ 2 = 330 ps; corresponds to open volume of a divacancy; must be stabilized or being part of interstitial-type dislocation loops average lifetime (ps) t 2 (ps) h 0,8 0,6 0,4 450 400 350 380 360 340 320 300 280 260 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 microvoids surface fraction of trapped positrons defect-related lifetime divacancy-type defect Silicon self-implantation - 3.5 MeV, 5 10 15 cm -2 - annealed 30s 900 C - Cu contaminated bulk silicon 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 depth (µm)
0 5 mm SIMS profile of Cu
Conclusions Vacancy agglomerates are the getter centers at Depth profiling using positron microscope very promising This presentation, our posters, and conference papers can be found as pdf-files on our Website: http://www.ep3.uni-halle.de/positrons