Theorie der Kondensierten Materie II SS Scattering in 2D: the logarithm and the renormalization group

Similar documents
Properties of the S-matrix

Causality. but that does not mean it is local in time, for = 1. Let us write ɛ(ω) = ɛ 0 [1 + χ e (ω)] in terms of the electric susceptibility.

Finite Temperature Field Theory

Tritium β decay in pionless EFT

Theorie der Kondensierten Materie I WS 16/ Chemical potential in the BCS state (40 Punkte)

Electroweak Probes of Three-Nucleon Systems

Quantization of the E-M field. 2.1 Lamb Shift revisited 2.1. LAMB SHIFT REVISITED. April 10, 2015 Lecture XXVIII

Physikalisches Praktikum für Fortgeschrittene 1 Dielectric Constant Assistent: Herr Dr. M. Ghatkesar by Therese Challand theres.

Types of Real Integrals

Exercises involving contour integrals and trig integrals

Problem Set #4: 4.1,4.7,4.9 (Due Monday, March 25th)

Evaluation of integrals

Math 460: Complex Analysis MWF 11am, Fulton Hall 425 Homework 8 Solutions Please write neatly, and in complete sentences when possible.

Math 220A Homework 4 Solutions

Week 5-6: Lectures The Charged Scalar Field

Landau-Fermi liquid theory

Unitarity, Dispersion Relations, Cutkosky s Cutting Rules

(relativistic effects kinetic energy & spin-orbit coupling) 3. Hyperfine structure: ) (spin-spin coupling of e & p + magnetic moments) 4.

Final Exam - MATH 630: Solutions

Structure of near-threshold s-wave resonances

Part IB. Further Analysis. Year

Landau-Fermi liquid theory

Hadronic Light-by-Light Scattering and Muon g 2: Dispersive Approach

3.3 Energy absorption and the Green function

Chapter 11: Dielectric Properties of Materials

Sector Decomposition

QFT PS7: Interacting Quantum Field Theory: λφ 4 (30/11/17) The full propagator in λφ 4 theory. Consider a theory of a real scalar field φ

Errata 1. p. 5 The third line from the end should read one of the four rows... not one of the three rows.

LAMB SHIFT & VACUUM POLARIZATION CORRECTIONS TO THE ENERGY LEVELS OF HYDROGEN ATOM

Path integral in quantum mechanics based on S-6 Consider nonrelativistic quantum mechanics of one particle in one dimension with the hamiltonian:

1 The Quantum Anharmonic Oscillator

Quantum Electrodynamics Test

Macroscopic dielectric theory

Math 185 Fall 2015, Sample Final Exam Solutions

PHYS 611, SPR 12: HOMEWORK NO. 4 Solution Guide

Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley. GRADUATE PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION, Part A Fall Semester 2014

Plasmonics: elementary excitation of a plasma (gas of free charges) nano-scale optics done with plasmons at metal interfaces

13 Definite integrals

Consistent Histories. Chapter Chain Operators and Weights

The Feynman Propagator and Cauchy s Theorem

PHYS 3900 Homework Set #03

Math Homework 2

Vacuum Energy and Effective Potentials

PROBLEMSET 4 SOLUTIONS

1 Running and matching of the QED coupling constant

Evaluation of Triangle Diagrams

GATE EE Topic wise Questions SIGNALS & SYSTEMS

REVIEW REVIEW. Quantum Field Theory II

Quantum Field Theory II

Problem 1. Arfken

Review of scalar field theory. Srednicki 5, 9, 10

Landau s Fermi Liquid Theory

Physics 506 Winter 2008 Homework Assignment #4 Solutions. Textbook problems: Ch. 9: 9.6, 9.11, 9.16, 9.17

Electric fields in matter

PHOTON PROPAGATOR (A REVIEW) The inhomogeneous wave equation for the four-dimensional vector

Loop Corrections: Radiative Corrections, Renormalization and All

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 21 Hyperfine Structure in Hydrogen and Alkali Atoms

Preface Introduction to the electron liquid

Energy-momentum tensor correlators in hot Yang-Mills theory

The Dirac Field. Physics , Quantum Field Theory. October Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz

7 Asymptotics for Meromorphic Functions

LINEAR RESPONSE THEORY

Self-consistent Conserving Approximations and Renormalization in Quantum Field Theory at Finite Temperature

Effective Field Theory for Nuclear Physics! Akshay Vaghani! Mississippi State University!

Electrodynamics Exam Solutions

3 Constitutive Relations: Macroscopic Properties of Matter

Analytic continuation of functional renormalization group equations

Complex Analysis Math 185A, Winter 2010 Final: Solutions

Some Fun with Divergent Series

2.1 Green Functions in Quantum Mechanics

does not change the dynamics of the system, i.e. that it leaves the Schrödinger equation invariant,

Time dependent perturbation theory 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 11 May 2012

Übungen zur Elektrodynamik (T3)

Lecture notes for QFT I (662)

TOPICS IN NUMBER THEORY - EXERCISE SHEET I. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

General Relativity and Cosmology Mock exam

Solutions to exam : 1FA352 Quantum Mechanics 10 hp 1

MAT389 Fall 2016, Problem Set 11

Multipole Expansion for Radiation;Vector Spherical Harmonics

Notes: Most of the material presented in this chapter is taken from Jackson, Chap. 2, 3, and 4, and Di Bartolo, Chap. 2. 2π nx i a. ( ) = G n.

Advanced Vitreous State The Physical Properties of Glass

An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Peskin and Schroeder) Solutions

Coulomb effects in pionless effective field theory

Nonlinear wave-wave interactions involving gravitational waves

Classical Mechanics/Electricity and Magnetism. Preliminary Exam. August 20, :00-15:00 in P-121

Scattering Tutorial. Erich Mueller. August 12, 2002

Moment of inertia. Contents. 1 Introduction and simple cases. January 15, Introduction. 1.2 Examples

QFT. Chapter 14: Loop Corrections to the Propagator

COMPLEX ANALYSIS Spring 2014

LS coupling. 2 2 n + H s o + H h f + H B. (1) 2m

Solutions to practice problems for the final

Lecture 5 Scattering theory, Born Approximation. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

561 F 2005 Lecture 14 1

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION, Part 1. Solutions. Problem 1: Mathematical Methods. x 2. 1 (1 + 2x 2 /3!) ] x 2 1 2x 2 /3

Part IB Complex Analysis

Mathematics 350: Problems to Study Solutions

Intercollegiate post-graduate course in High Energy Physics. Paper 1: The Standard Model

221B Lecture Notes Scattering Theory II

Chapter 10: QUANTUM SCATTERING

Monday, April 13. Today: equation of motion method (EOM) Dyson equation and Self-energy. Many-Body Green s Functions

Transcription:

Karlsruher Institut für Technologie Institut für Theorie der Kondensierten Materie Theorie der Kondensierten Materie II SS 2017 PD Dr. B. Narozhny Blatt 2 M. Sc. M. Bard Lösungsvorschlag 1. Scattering in 2D: the logarithm and the renormalization group (a) Derivative of the scattering amplitude (ɛ)/. From the last exercise sheet we know the formal expansion of the scattering amplitude F = V + V G 0 V + V G 0 V G 0 V +.... The only quantity that depends on energy is the Green s function G 0. If we differentiate F with respect to ɛ we need to use the product rule. It is important here to keep the correct order of the operators. We find: = V G 0 V +V [ G0 V G 0 + G 0 V G ] 0 V [ G0 V G 0V G 0 + G 0 V G 0 V G 0 + G 0 V G 0 V G 0 + V ] V +... Graphically, this can be depicted as follows, where lines with crosses correspond to the derivatives of the Green s function. (b) Summing of the series and derivation of the renormalization group (RG) equation. We can now sort all terms according to the occurrence of the position of the derivative. We first collect all terms where the derivative acts on the most left G 0 and add the terms, where the derivative acts on the second G 0 and so on: = V G 0 [V + V G 0V +...] + V G 0 V G 0 [V + V G 0V +...] The square brackets can now be replaced by F : + V G 0 V G 0 V G 0 [V + V G 0V +...] +... = V G 0 F + V G 0V G 0 F + V G 0V G 0 V G 0 F +... = F G 0 F

This corresponds to the diagram After computing the derivative of G 0, we can write down the equation for the function F (ɛ, k 1, k 2 ) as an integral equation (ɛ, k 1, k 2 ) = d 2 q F (ɛ, k 1, q)f (ɛ, q, k 2 ) (2π) 2 ( ) 2. ɛ q2 + i0 2m So far, our calculations were exact. Consider now the limit of low energies, ɛ 1/2ma 2, where a is the effective interaction radius of the short-range potential. Since the scattering amplitude as a function of its momenta varies on the scale k 1,2 1/a, we may disregard this dependence in the integral, since the integral converges already at small momenta q 1/a. We assume here as well that the potential is rotationally symmetric such that there is no dependence on the the direction of the momenta. The integration over q is now elementary and we find = m 2πɛ F 2 (ɛ). (c) Solution of the RG equation. The above equation can be easily solved: 2π F (ɛ) = m ln(ɛ/ɛ 0 + i0). (1) Here the constant ɛ 0 < 0 is real and negative. This follows from the fact, that the scattering amplitude is real for negative energies. To reach this conclusion, one can write down the perturbation series in the coordinate representation where the Green s function has the form G ɛ (r) = m 2πr eiκr, κ 2 = 2mɛ, which is real for negative energies. If the constant ɛ 0 belongs to the low energy region, ɛ 0 < 1/(ma 2 ), then the pole ɛ = ɛ 0 has the physical meaning of the bound state. Otherwise, the pole is meaningless, since it lies beyond the energy region where our approximations are justified. 2. Polarizability of a ground state (a) Definition of the Green s function in the momentum representation

From the first exercise sheet we know that we can write down the Green s function as G = G 0 +G 0 F G 0. The Green s function in the energy-momentum space can thus be written as G(ɛ, p 1, p 2 ) = (2π)2 δ(p 1 p 2 ) ɛ ɛ p1 + i0 + F (ɛ) (ɛ ɛ p1 + i0)(ɛ ɛ p2 + i0) The ground state corresponds to the filled bound state with the (negative) energy ɛ 0. All other states ( scattering states at positive energies ɛ = p 2 /(2m)) are empty. We shift the empty states to the lower half-plane, hence the imaginary part +i0 in the Green s function. The pole at ɛ 0 belongs to the scattering amplitude. This pole we shift to the upper half-plane. The branch point ɛ = 0 we keep in the lower half-plane. If we calculate for example the density [or the dipole moment, see part (b)], we close the contour in the upper half-plane, which takes into account only the characteristics of the bound state. (b) Relation between dipole moment and exact Green s function. The dipole moment is given as usual by the first moment of the (effective) charge distribution P = e d 2 r r n(r) = ie d 2 r r lim G(t, r, r) t 0 d 2 p 1 d 2 p 2 = e d 2 r r e i(p 1 p 2 dω )r lim (2π) 4 t 0 2πi e iωt G(ω, p 1, p 2 ) d 2 p 1 d 2 p 2 = ie [ (2π) 2 p1 δ(p 1 p 2 )] Res[G(ω, p 1, p 2 ), ω] Im (ω)>0 d 2 p 1 = ie (2π) [Res( 2 p 1 G(ω, p 1, p 2 ), ω = ɛ 0 + i0)] p2 =p 1 Here we need to set p 2 = p 1 after taking the derivative w.r.t. p 1. We easily observe that without an electric field the polarization is zero ( p1 ɛ p1 p 1 odd function). (c) Diagrammatic expansion of the Green s function in the applied electric field. We now add an electric field to our system that distorts the (effective) charge distribution and leads to a finite polarization. With the help of the Green s function G that already incorporates the effects of the short-range potential, we can expand the Green s function G W in powers of the electric potential W as G W = G + GW G + GW GW G +... For the Green s function G we have the equation [see part (a)] G = G 0 + G 0 F G 0. Diagrammatically this looks like

(d) Correction to Green s function linear in E and the polarizability. The correction to G linear in E reads δg = GW G. If we know express G with the help of the scattering amplitude F, we have to evaluate the following 4 diagrams The electric potential in the momentum space has the form W (p) = ee d 2 re ipr x = iee(2π) 2 δ(p). p x The first diagram gives no contribution to P since there are no poles in the upper half-plane. The second diagram gives a finite contribution: δg (2) d 2 p = (2π) G 0(ɛ, p 2 1 )W (p 1 p)g 0 (ɛ, p)f (ɛ)g 0 (ɛ, p 2 ) = iee d 2 p1,x δ(p 1 p 2 )F (ɛ) p [ɛ ɛ p1 + i0][ɛ ɛ p + i0][ɛ ɛ p2 + i0] = iee m F (ɛ) p 1,x [ɛ p2 1 + 2m i0]3 [ɛ p2 2 + i0] 2m The third diagram evaluates to a similar expression; the result reads δg (3) = iee m F (ɛ) p 2,x [ɛ p2 1 2m + i0][ɛ p2 2 2m + i0]3. The fourth diagram vanishes because d δg (4) = ieef 2 2 pd 2 p (ɛ)g 0 (ɛ, p 1 )G 0 (ɛ, p 2 ) (2π) G 0(ɛ, p)g 2 0 (ɛ, p ) px δ(p p ) = ieef 2 d 2 p p x /m (ɛ)g 0 (ɛ, p 1 )G 0 (ɛ, p 2 ) (2π) 2 (ɛ p2 + 2m i0)3 = 0.

For the polarizability, we need the residue of the Green s function. The residue of the Green s function G W can be obtained by plugging ɛ 0 into the free Green s function G 0 and calculating the residue of F : ResG(ω, p, p ie ) = ResF (ɛ) ɛ0 m E [ p xg 0 (ɛ 0, p)g 3 0(ɛ 0, p ) p x G 3 0(ɛ 0, p)g 0 (ɛ 0, p ) ]. ω The two terms contribute equalle due to symmetry. The residue of the scattering amplitude can be found as follows 2π F (ɛ) = m ln(ɛ/ɛ 0 ) ɛ ɛ 0 2π m/ɛ 0 (ɛ ɛ 0 ) ResF (ɛ) = 2πɛ 0 ɛ0 m The polarizability χ measures the amount of polarization for a weak electric field: P = χe. In this simple example the tensor χ is diagonal. The applied field induces a polarization in the same direction (here: x-direction). We find χ = ie E d 2 p (2π) 2 [ p x Res(δG(ω, p, p )) Pictorially, the polarizability can be represented by ]. p =p,e 0 where the Green s function contains all of the above four terms and the dashed line corresponds to either δ(r) (in momentum representation) or r (in coordinate representation). Then the first term in δg vanishes after the integration over energies, the fourht due to the odd character of r, while the second and third are identical due to symmetry. All remaining integrals are elementary (we close the contour in the upper-half plane, such that only the pole at ɛ 0 contributes), the final result reads χ =. 6mɛ 2 0 Interpretation: A large charge e and a small binding energy ɛ 0 lead to a large polarizability. This is not surprising since the electric potential energy is proportional to the charge and one expects the electron to be more susceptible to perturbations the weaker it is bound by the short-range potential. e2