IFUP-TH-2017, FTPI-MINN-17/23, UMN-TH-3707-17 arxiv:1712.04814v1 [hep-th] 13 Dec 2017 Patterns of Symmetry Breaking in Chiral QCD Stefano Bolognesi (1,2), Kenichi Konishi (1,2), Mikhail Shifman (3,4) (1) Department of Physics E. Fermi, University of Pisa Largo Pontecorvo, 3, Ed. C, 56127 Pisa, Italy (2) INFN, Sezione di Pisa, Largo Pontecorvo, 3, Ed. C, 56127 Pisa, Italy (3) William I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA (4) Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, UC Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA stefano.bolognesi@unipi.it, kenichi.konishi@unipi.it, shifman@umn.edu December 14, 2017 Abstract We consider a number of SU(N) Yang-Mills theories with massless chiral fermions in a complex representation of the gauge group. The possible patterns of realization of the continuous chiral flavor symmetry are discussed. We argue that the chiral symmetry is broken in conjunction with a dynamical Higgsing of the gauge group (complete or partial) by bi-fermion condensates. As a result a color-flavor locked symmetry is preserved. The t Hooft anomaly matching proceeds via saturation of triangles by massless composite fermions or, in a mixed mode, i.e. also by the weakly coupled fermions associated with dynamical Abelianization, supplemented by a number of Nambu-Goldstone mesons. Gauge-singlet condensates are multifermion type and, though it cannot be excluded, the chiral symmetry realization via such gauge invariant condensates is more contrived (requires a number of four-fermion condensates simultaneously and, even so, problems remain), and less plausible. We conclude that in the models at hand, chiral flavor symmetry implies dynamical Higgsing by bifermion condensates. 1
1 Introduction The pattern of the chiral symmetry breaking (χsb) in QCD with N f massless Dirac flavors is well-known. χsb occurs at strong coupling. The main tool for its analysis is matching the t Hooft triangles, [1] combined with the large-n limit and the fact that the singlet axial current is internally anomalous. Applying these tools one concludes that the global symmetry SU f (N) SU f (N) U(1) is broken down to the vector subgroup SU f (N) U(1) with Nf 2 1 Nambu-Goldstone (NG) particles which saturate t Hooft s anomaly matching conditions. Theories with chiral fermions are explored to a much lesser extent. 1 We shall be interested in a G c = SU(N) gauge theory with Weyl fermions Ψ in a complex representation of G c, and without scalars. The systems considered are asymptotically free, so that the interactions become strong in the infrared, but no gauge-invariant bifermion scalar condensates are possible. In general, these models possess a nontrivial chiral symmetry G f ; the requirement that G f is either spontaneously broken (entailing the Nambu-Goldstone mesons) or realized linearly in the infrared, combined with the t Hooft matching, is so strong that it allows us to determine most likely dynamical phases of the theories under consideration. Even though gauge-invariant condensates of different types, such as four-fermion composites, Ψ 4, Ψ 2 Ψ 2 or bifermion condensates with gauge fields (such as ΨGΨ, ΨGGΨ, etc.), are in principle possible, the t Hooft matching in the linear realization cannot be achieved. As to the Nambu-Goldstone (NG) realizations, they appear to be highly contrived and, moreover, the NG bosons couplings to the appropriate flavor currents is hard to organize. In view of the above we explore the possibility that bifermion gauge-noninvariant condensates Ψ 2,whichHiggsthegaugesymmetry(orapartofit)playtheprincipal dynamical role. We will consider a number of examples of such chiral theories and determine solutions (including the t Hooft saturation) which arguably present the chiral symmetry realization in combination with Higgsing. We will refer to the models to be considered below as follows (see also Fig. 1): (i) ψχη model suggested in [3]. This model has SU(N) c gauge symmetry and the fermion sector consisting of the left-handed fermion matter fields ψ {ij}, χ [ij], η A i, (A = 1,2,...,8), (1) where ψ {ij} is a two-index symmetric representation of SU(N) c, χ [ij] is an antiantisymmetric tensor, and we have eight anti-fundamental fields ηi A. The index i 1 See e.g., Raby et.al. [2] for a notable exception. 2
belongs to SU(N) c while A to the chiral G f = SU(8) f symmetry. All spinor fields above (i.e. ψ, χ and η) are represented by undotted Weyl spinors. of (ii) χ η model. The gauge group is SU(N) c while the fermion sector is composed χ [ij], η i,a, (A = 1,2,...,N 4). (2) The flavor symmetry of the model is SU(N 4) f U(1). (iii) ψη model. The gauge group is SU(N) c. The fermion sector includes ψ {ij}, η A i, (A = 1,2,...,N +4). (3) The flavor symmetry of the model is SU(N +4) f U(1). N χ η η χ η ψχη ψη N ψ Figure 1: A class of chiral QCD theories at large N in the plane (N ψ,n χ ). (iv) Extensions of the models (i) (iii) can be of two types. The first is ψ {ij},a, χ B [ij], ηk j, (A = 1,...,N ψ, B = 1,...,N χ, K = 1,...,N η ) (4) with N η = (N ψ N χ )N +4(N ψ +N χ ), (5) which is valid for N η > 0. Otherwise ψ {ij},a, χ B [ij], ηi,k, (A = 1,...,N ψ, B = 1,...,N χ, K = 1,...,N η ) (6) 3
with N η = (N χ N ψ )N 4(N ψ +N χ ), (7) which is valid for N η > 0. To have asymptotic freedom we must limit to 2N ψ N +6N ψ +2N χ < 11N. (8) Figure 1 gives a schematic representation of the various theories at large N where both N ψ and N χ can go up to 5. The closed circles mark the models we will consider in the rest of the paper. Below we give the simplest solutions to the matching conditions and argue that other solutions solutions are unlikely. 2 ψχη model The ψχη model is asymptotically free, with the first coefficient of the beta function The global symmetry of the model is b = 1 (9N 8). (9) 3 G f = SU(8) U 1 (1) U 2 (1) N. (10) where U 1,2 are anomaly-free combinations out of U ψ, U χ, U η, and N, N = GCD{N +2,N 2,8} (11) is a subgroup of anomaly-free discrete N+2 N 2 8, which do not belong to U 1 (1) U 2 (1). There are two fermion bilinear condensates, and φ ia ψ ij ηj A, A = 1,2,...,8, (12) which, we assume, play the crucial role in the dynamics. φ i j = ψik χ kj, (13) 4
2.1 (Partial) Color-flavor locking If φ ia = ψ ij η A j Λ 3 δ ia 0,, i,a = 1,2,...,8 (14) the flavor SU(8) is spontaneously broken, and so is the SU(8) subgroup of SU(N) c. The global diagonal SU(8) (also known as color-flavor (cf) locked group) survives. The Nambu-Goldstone (NG) excitations associated with the spontaneous breaking of SU(8) f are eaten up by the gauge bosons of SU(8) c ; they Higgs this subgroup. Also unbroken isthe SU(N 8) c subgroup provided thesecond condensate, Eq. (13), does not develop. In fact, we will argue that the system must develop also the condensates in the adjoint representation φ i j = Λ3 C i δj i 0, (15) where all constants C i are assumed to be different, and two options are possible in Eq. (15): either i,j > 8 but N (p 8), or some of these indices are allowed to be < 8. Here p is an integer to be specified below (we anticipate that p = 12). To begin with, let us consider the first option. The symmetry breaking pattern in these case 8 < i,j N (p 8) is SU(N) c SU(8) f U(1) 2 SU(8) cf U(1) N p 1 SU(p 8) c. (16) The U(1) 2 factor on the left-hand side of (16) is due to two non-anomalous U(1) symmetries. The theory under consideration has three U(1) symmetries associated with rotations of ψ, χ, and η, respectively. One of them is anomalous. Note that if neither of the condensates (14) and (15) vanishes two anomaly-free U(1) symmetries are spontaneously broken. The factor U(1) N p 1 on the right-hand side of Eq. (16) is the unbroken Cartan subgroup of SU(N p). Let us denote the indices from SU(p 8) by bars. Then all gluons with unbarred indices (except those from the Cartan subalgebra of SU(N 8)) get masses. We have no confinement for unbarred indices. It is only SU(p 8) that confines i,.e., only fermions with barred indices are confined. Most of the fermions are unconfined. We could reach the triangle saturation à la t Hooft as follows. Let us consider baryons massless (by assumption) fermion states which are constructed from condensates and the η fields, B {AB} = ψ {ij} η A j ηb i A,B symm φ ia η B i A,B symm (17) 5
transforming in the symmetric representation of SU(8) cf, which can be achieved by an appropriate spin index convolution, and B A j = ψ ik χ kj η A i φ i j ηa i. (18) The former is a symmetric tensor of SU(8) cf. It contributes 8+4 = 12 to the SU(8) 3 triangle. The baryon B A j is fundamental both in color and in flavor. In the scenario of partial Higgsing of the gauge group (15), taking j = 9,10,...N p+8, we find that B A j contributes N p to the SU(8) 3 triangle anomaly. We observe that the sum of the contributions from B {AB} and B A j is 12+N p, (19) which perfectly saturates the t Hooft anomaly matching for SU(8) 3 if and only if p = 12. The symmetry breaking pattern (16) is, accordingly SU(N) c SU(8) f U(1) 2 SU(8) cf U(1) N 13 SU(4) c, (20) Since the anomaly-free U(1) 2 symmetries on the left-hand side of (20) are both broken by the condensates (14) and (15) we do not need to worry about the U(1)- SU(8) 2 or U(1) 3 triangles. There must exist two NG bosons associated with these non-anomalous U(1) s, which are presumably the phases of the condensates (14) and (15). Thus, the first option in (i) can be summarized as follows. The condensates are φ ia = Λ 3 c1 8 0 N 8,8, φ i j = Λ 3 0 8,8 C 9... C N 4 0 4,4. (21) The theory dynamically Abelianizes (in part). SU(8) SU(N) is completely Higgsed but due to color-flavor partial locking no NG bosons appear in this sector (the would-be NG bosons make the SU(8) SU(N) gauge bosons massive.) Only SU(4) SU(N) remains unbroken and confining. The remainder of the gauge group Abelianizes. The baryons B A j η A j (9 j N 4) and B {AB}, symmetric in the flavor indices, 2 remain massless and together saturatethe t Hooftanomaly matching condition for SU(8). 2 If the massless B {AB} were antisymmetric in (A B), they would contribute 8 4 = 4 to the SU(8) anomaly. We would then need N 4 massless fermions of the form B A j η A j, but this is impossible as the latter arise from the Abelianization of the rest of the color gauge group, SU(N 8). 6
It is possible that the color-flavor locking occurs with split SU(8) cf. If φ ia takes the form c 1 1 A1 φ ia... = c h 1 Ah, Ai = 8, (22) 0 N 8,8 and φ i j is the same as before, the pattern (20) is replaced by SU(N) c SU(8) f U(1) 2 i SU(A i ) cf U(1) cf U(1) N 13 SU(4) c, (23) All various triangle anomalies associated with i SU(A i) cf U(1) cf are seen to be fully saturated by the massless baryons B {AB} and weakly coupled B A j s. Clearly, however, these solutions are possible only for N 12. For smaller N we might resort to the second option mentioned below Eq. (15). Namely, if the condensate (15) is such that it Abelianizes the theory at i,j < 8, then one may afford to have a smaller color-flavor locked global symmetry by adjusting the condensate (14) appropriately. It is tempting then to consider the symmetry breaking pattern SU(N) c SU(8) f U(1) 2 SU(M) cf U(1) N p 1 SU(p M) c SU(8 M) f U(1) cf (24) with M < 8 (and, of course, M N), in other words, to assume the condensates of the form, φ ia = ψ ij η A j = Λ 3 δ ia 0,, i,a = 1,2,...,M, M < 8 ; (25) φ i j = c j δ i j, i,j,= M +1,M +2,...,N M p (26) Actually, it can be easily checked that the fermions B {AB} and B j A cannot saturate the anomalies SU(M) 3 cf, SU(8 M)3 f, and other triangles involving U(1), for any choice of p. We hence exclude the dynamical scenario presented in (24)-(26). 2.2 Full Abelianization Another option, which so far is the only viable for N smaller than 12, is that no color-flavor locking takes place. The flavor symmetry remains unbroken: SU(N) c SU(8) f U(1) 2 U(1) N 1 SU(8) f. (27) 7
In this case, the gauge group dynamically Abelianizes completely. The fields η A i are all massless and weakly coupled (only to the gauge bosons from the Cartan subalgebra which we will refer to as the photons) in the infrared, together with the N 1 photons. The anomaly matching is trivial. 2.3 Remarks We are unable, for general large N, to decide which of the dynamical scenarios (16), (23) or(27) is realized. They represent a few possible dynamical scenarios, with colorflavor locking and (partial) dynamical Abelianization, which produce some massless baryon-type composites fermions, together with weakly coupled η fields associated with the Abelianization. It is interesting that in other versions of the chiral theories considered below, these phenomena manifest themselves in slight variations of these: with massless baryons but without dynamical Abelianization in Sections 3 and 4, and complete dynamical Higgsing (or complete Abelianization) and no massless baryons, in Section 5. Abelianization is a ubiquitous phenomenon in N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theories, where scalar fields in the adjoint representation are present in the UV, and the perturbative potential has flat directions so that φ adjoint 0 at a general point on the vacuum moduli space. Even though appealing, however, it seems to be highly unlikely that the Seiberg-Witten duality [4](the low-enegy degrees of freedom are the magnetic monopoles and dyons, the associated gauge groups being dual, magnetic U(1) N 1 s) can be realized dynamically in our model, in view of absence of the flat directions. The strength of the effective adjoint scalar condensate in our case is of the order of Λ 3. The associated fermions η A i now interact only with the U(1) fields, and thus become weakly coupled in the infrared. Somewhat analogous phenomena in N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theories are rather trivial cases of quark singularities at large values of adjoint scalar vacuum expectation values (VEV s). 2.4 Planar equivalence The ψχη model was argued [3] to be planar equivalent to N = 1 super-yang-mills theory (SYM). The arguments were based on the assumption that both theories are realized in the confining regime. Since, as we see, the ψχη model is realized in the Higgs regime (full or partial Higgsing) the planar equivalence fails. One can present an alternative consideration demonstrating the failure of the planar equivalence between SYM and the Armoni-Shifman model [3]. This consideration follows the line of reasoning of [5]. 8
IfweanalyzeboththeoriesonacylinderR 3 S 1 withr(s 1 ) Λ 1 wewilldiscover that for SYM theory the N center symmetry of SU(N) c is preserved, implying a smooth transition to r(s 1 ) Λ 1 and confinement in the R 4 limit. The SYM theory is C symmetric, and C invariance is not spontaneously broken [5, 6]. At the same time, the Armoni-Shifman model [3] explicitly breaks P and C invariances, its Lagrangian preserves only CP. Moreover, its vacuum structure is completely different from that of SYM and is characterized by broken N center symmetry of SU(N) c [8]. The statement of N isolated vacuum states in SYM is also not inherited by the ψχη model because of the NG boson (see also (11)). 3 χ η model Consider now the SU(N) gauge theory with the chiral fermion sector 3 χ [ij], η ia, A = 1,2,...,N 4. (28) Compared to the ψχη model we dropped the field ψ and adjusted the number of η s (taken in the fundamental, rather than antifundamental representation of SU(N) c ) to keep the theory free of the gauge anomaly. The global symmetry of this model is SU(N 4) f U(1). The latter U(1) is an anomaly-free linear combination of two U(1) symmetries of the fermion sector. The second U(1) is anomalous. The χ η model is known to be asymptotically free (AF), with the first coefficient of the beta function b = 1 [11N (N 2) (N 4)] = 3N +2. (29) 3 The theory becomes strongly coupled in the infrared. Having no adjoint complex scalar order parameter bilinear in the fermion fields(as ψχ in the ψχη model considered earlier), we do not expect dynamical Abelianization to occur. Let us assume that the scalar acquires a color-flavor locked diagonal VEV, 4 as in (14), ϕ A j χ [ij] η ia (30) ϕ A j = cλ3 δ A j 0, j, A = 1,2,...,N 4. (31) Then the gauge and global symmetry breaking pattern is SU(N) c SU(N 4) f U(1) SU(N 4) cf SU(4) c. (32) 3 The SU(5) model with one quintet and one 10 was used for Grand Unification. 4 This option was mentioned as one of a number of possibilities in [7]. 9
The SU(4) c factor on the right-hand side of (32) confines. The massless baryons similar to (18) take the form B {AB} = χ [ij] η ia η jb ϕ A j ηjb (33) transforming in the symmetric representation of SU(N 4) cf. Then the multiplet contributes to the SU(N 4) 3 cf triangle as B {AB} N 4+4 = N. (34) This exactly matches the ultraviolet anomaly in the corresponding flavor symmetry triangle in the χη model, which reduces to N from the original quarks η ia which belong to the fundamental representation of the UV gauge symmetry. The nonanomalous U(1) is broken by the condensate (31). This requires a single massless Nambu-Goldstone meson. 4 ψη model Now consider another reduction of the ψχη model. Namely, we drop the field χ and adjust the number of η s to keep the theory free of the gauge anomaly. For the SU(N) gauge group the fermion sector is The symmetry of this model is ψ {ij}, η B i, B = 1,2,...,N +4. (35) SU(N) c SU(N +4) f U(1), (36) where U(1) is an anomaly free-combination of U(1) ψ and U(1) η. This model is asymptotically free as the first coefficient of the β function is b = 1 [11N (N +2) (N +4)] = 3N 2. (37) 3 The theory is strongly coupled in the infrared. Again, we do not have a dynamical bifermion scalar operator in the adjoint representation of the gauge group. As previously (see (30)), we assume that the condensate of Φ jb develops, φ jb = ψ ij η B i = cλ3 δ jb 0, j, B = 1,2,...,N. (38) Then the pattern of the symmetry breaking takes the form SU(N) c SU(N +4) f U(1) SU(N) cf SU(4) f. (39) 10
The non-anomalous U(1), a linear combination of U(1) ψ and U(1) η is spontaneously broken by the condensate (38), entailing a single massless NG boson. Now, let us check that the SU(4) 3 flavor and SU(N)3 cf triangles are saturated by massless baryons and B [AB] = φ ja η B j = ψ ij η A i η B j, A,B = 1,2,...,N (40) B [AB] = φ ja η B j = ψ ij η A i ηb j, A = 1,2,...,N, B = N +1,...N +4. (41) Here we must choose B AB in the antisymmetric representation of the SU(N) cf group while B AB is in the (N,4) of SU(N) cf SU(4) flavor. The SU(N) 3 cf triangle is indeed saturated in the infrared by the contributions of B AB and B AB : N 4+4 = N. (42) The SU(4) 3 f triangle is saturated by B AB alone which produces the coefficient N. No other triangle anomalies are present: the mixed ones give 0 = 0 both at the UV and infrared. 5 Extended ψχη models In the examples below the number of the fields η in the fundamental representation of the gauge group is established from the condition of the absence of the gauge anomalies. Let us start from the SU(N) gauge model with the chiral fermion sector ψ {ij},a, χ [ij], η B j, A = 1,2, B = 1,2,...,N +12. (43) The symmetries of the theory are The first coefficient of the β function is SU(N) c SU(2) f SU(12+N) f U(1) 2. (44) b = 1 3 [11N 2(N +2) (N 2) (12+N)] = 1 (7N 14). (45) 3 The triangle anomalies to be matched are SU(12+N) 3 f triangle anomalies.). (Note that SU(2) has no 11
Assuming that ψ {ij},1 χ [ik] = C j Λ 3 δ j k 0, j,k = 1,2,...,N (46) we break SU(N) c down to the Cartan subgroup. If also ψ {ij},2 χ [ik] 0, j,k = 1,2,...,N (47) they can together Higgs gauge group completely. If ψ {ij},2 χ [ik] = 0, instead, the Cartan subgroup of SU(N) c survives in the infrared. The fermion fields η B j are unconfined in the former case, or are weakly coupled to the U(1) N 1 in the latter case. In either case, the matching of the SU(12+N) f t Hooft triangles is trivial. The second extended ψχη model with the chiral fermion sector ψ {ij}, χ A [ij], ηbj, A = 1,2, B = 1,2,...,N 12, (48) can be dealt with exactly in the same way as above. 6 Additional support from the Maximal Attractive Channel (MAC) argument A general idea that color-nonsinglet bifermion condensates may form and induce the dynamical gauge symmetry breaking was proposed long ago in Raby et. al. [2] basing on the so-called MAC argument. Even though we do not rely on the MAC criterion to decide what happens in our chiral models, and do not follow the rules proposed in [2], it is nonetheless suggestive to compare the strength of one-gluon exchange force in various bifermion scalar channels, formed by two out of the three types of 12
fermions, ψ, χ and η. Some of the most probable channels are A : B : C : D : E : F : ( ) ( ) ψ ψ χ ( ) χ ( ) ( ) ( ) η η ( ) ( ) χ η ( ) ( ) ψ χ ( ) ( ) ψ η forming ; forming ; forming ; forming ; forming an adjoint representation ( φ); forming (φ); (49) The one-gluon exchange strength turns out to be, in the six cases above, proportional to A : 2(N 2 4) (N +2)(N 1) (N +2)(N 1) 2(N +2) = ; N N N N B : 2(N +1)(N 4)) (N +1)(N 2) (N +1)(N 2) 4(N +1) = ; N N N N C : (N +1)(N 2)) N2 1 N 2N N2 1 +1 = N 2N N ; D : 3(N +1)(N 3)) N2 1 (N +1)(N 2) 2N +2 = ; 2N 2N N N E : (N +2)(N 1) (N +1)(N 2) N = N2 4 N N N ; F : N 2 1 2N N2 1 (N +2)(N 1) (N +2)(N 1) =, 2N N N (50) respectively. Wenotethatthe φ(ψχ)andφ(ψη)condensatesconsidered byus(cases E and F, respectively) correspond precisely to the two most attractive channels, at large N: their attraction strength scales as O(N) in contrast to the other four channels which scale as O(1). 13
7 Why chiral symmetry breaking patterns without Higgsing are disfavored Let us return to the ψχη model discussed in Sec. 2 and analyze the chiral SU(8) symmetry under the assumption that the gauge SU(N) symmetry is not Higgsed, completely or partially, and the theory is realized in the confinement regime similar to that of QCD. The simplest option is that no fermion condensates are formed and SU(8) f remains unbroken. Then we will have to match SU(8) 3 f triangle and two SU(8) 2 f U(1) triangles. To find a set of massless gauge-invariant composite fermions (baryons), able to reproduce the correct UV SU(8) 3 f and SU(8) 2 f U(1) anomalies (= N) appears to be a hopeless task. Now let us analyze color-singlet condensates. The simplest relevant one is the four-fermion condensate ψ ik ηk Aψij ηj B. (51) Related NG excitations must be (derivatively) coupled to the current (j α α ) B A = η αaη B α. (52) Note, however, that the condensate (51) is purely real and therefore does not break two anomaly-free U(1) chiral symmetries. The condensate (51) if existed would break SU(8) f U(1) 7. These U(1) factors are the Cartan subalgebra of SU(8) f, not to be confused with with the anomaly-free U(1) chiral symmetries of the type U(1) η +C 1 U(1) ψ and U(1) η +C 2 U(1) χ (here C 1,2 are numerical constants). To break the flavor symmetry completely, we must add another condensates, e.g. Θ CD AB = (ηa [i ηb j] )(ηc [i ηd j] ) or ΓB A = (χ [ij]ηk A)(χ [ij]ηk B ). (53) However, the symmetries U(1) η + C 1 U(1) ψ and U(1) η + C 2 U(1) χ mentioned above remain unbroken. This means that the triangle diagrams due to these symmetries must be matched à la t Hooft by saturating them by massless baryons, for instance, ψηη. Again, the matching does not seem possible at arbitrary N. Finally, a chiral four-fermion condensate ψ ij χ [jk] ψ kl χ [li] (54) could break both nonanomalous U(1) symmetries, but not SU(8): it does not affect the possible mechanism of realization of the chiral SU(8) symmetries at low energies. All in all, the dynamical Higgs mechanism by formation of gauge-dependent bifermion condensates discussed in the previous sections appears to be the most natural way of realizing the chiral flavor symmetries at low energies, in the class of models considered in the present paper. 14
Acknowledgments The work of M.S. was supported in part by DOE grant de-sc 0011842 and by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NSF PHY-1125915. M.S. is grateful to KITP where this paper was completed for kind hospitality extended to him during the Workshop Resurgent Asymptotics in Physics and Mathematics. The work of S.B and K.K. is supported by the INFN special project grant, GAST (Gauge and String Theory). M.S. thanks INFN, Pisa and University of Pisa for warm hospitality received during his visit to Pisa, when the collaboration on the present work started. References [1] G. t Hooft, Naturalness, Chiral Symmetry, and Spontaneous Chiral Symmetry Breaking, in Recent Developments In Gauge Theories, Eds. G. t Hooft, C. Itzykson, A.Jaffe,H.Lehmann, P.K.Mitter, I.M.SingerandR.Stora,(Plenum Press, New York, 1980) [Reprinted in Dynamical Symmetry Breaking, Ed. E. Farhi et al. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1982) p. 345 and in G. t Hooft, Under the Spell of the Gauge Principle, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994), p. 352]. [2] Stuart Raby, Savas Dimopoulos, and Leonard Susskind, Tumbling Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B169, 373 (1980). [3] A. Armoni and M. Shifman, A Chiral SU(N) Gauge Theory Planar Equivalent to Super-Yang-Mills, Phys. Rev. D 85, 105003(2012)[arXiv:1202.1657[hep-th]]. [4] N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, Nucl.Phys. B426, 19 (1994), hep-th/9407087; N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD, Nucl. Phys. B431, 484 (1994), hep-th/9408099. [5] M. Ünsal, Magnetic bion condensation: A New mechanism of confinement and mass gap in four dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 80, 065001 (2009) [arxiv:0709.3269 [hep-th]]; M. Ünsal and L. G. Yaffe, Center-stabilized Yang-Mills theory: Confinement and large-n volume independence, Phys. Rev. D 78, 065035 (2008) [arxiv:0803.0344 [hep-th]]; M. Shifman and M. Ünsal, QCD-like Theories on R(3) S 1 : A Smooth Journey from Small to Large r(s 1 ) with Double-Trace Deformations, Phys. Rev. D 78, 065004 (2008) [arxiv:0802.1232 [hep-th]]. 15
[6] A. Armoni, M. Shifman and M. Ünsal, Planar Limit of Orientifold Field Theories and Emergent Center Symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 77, 045012 (2008) [arxiv:0712.0672 [hep-th]]. [7] M. Shifman and M. Ünsal, On Yang-Mills Theories with Chiral Matter at Strong Coupling, Phys. Rev. D 79, 105010 (2009) [arxiv:0808.2485 [hep-th]]. [8] A. Cherman, M. Shifman and M. Ünsal, to be published. 16