arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 9 Aug 2005

Similar documents
Mn-doped II-VI quantum dots: artificial molecular magnets

Single Electron Transport in electrically tunable nanomagnets

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 15 Jun 2012

Optical Properties of Manganese-Doped Individual CdTe Quantum Dots

Spins and spin-orbit coupling in semiconductors, metals, and nanostructures

Teaching Nanomagnets New Tricks

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

interband transitions in semiconductors M. Fox, Optical Properties of Solids, Oxford Master Series in Condensed Matter Physics

From magnetic polarons to magnetic quantum dots. Jacek Kossut, Institute of Physics of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Optical Properties of Lattice Vibrations

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 17 Sep 1997

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 26 Sep 2001

Fine structure of trions and excitons in single GaAs quantum dots

Supplementary Figure 1 Level structure of a doubly charged QDM (a) PL bias map acquired under 90 nw non-resonant excitation at 860 nm.

Influence of hyperfine interaction on optical orientation in self-assembled InAs/GaAs quantum dots

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 7 Jan 2004

Valley Zeeman Effect of free and bound excitons in WSe2

Supplementary Figure 1: Spin noise spectra of 55 Mn in bulk sample at BL =10.5 mt, before subtraction of the zero-frequency line. a, Contour plot of

Optical Anisotropy of Quantum Disks in the External Static Magnetic Field

Anomalous spin suscep.bility and suppressed exchange energy of 2D holes

BOUND EXCITON LUMINESCENCE IN PHOSPHORUS DOPED Cd1- xmn xte CRYSTALS

Ultralong Spin Memory of Optically Excited Single Magnetic Quantum Dots

Universal valence-band picture of. the ferromagnetic semiconductor GaMnAs

Self-compensating incorporation of Mn in Ga 1 x Mn x As

Final Exam Tuesday, May 8, 2012 Starting at 8:30 a.m., Hoyt Hall Duration: 2h 30m

Electronic and Optoelectronic Properties of Semiconductor Structures

Optical Properties of Semiconductors. Prof.P. Ravindran, Department of Physics, Central University of Tamil Nadu, India

Interstitial Mn in (Ga,Mn)As: Hybridization with Conduction Band and Electron Mediated Exchange Coupling

Optical Properties of Solid from DFT

SECOND PUBLIC EXAMINATION. Honour School of Physics Part C: 4 Year Course. Honour School of Physics and Philosophy Part C C3: CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS

Size-Dependent Biexciton Quantum Yields and Carrier Dynamics of Quasi-

Spin Superfluidity and Graphene in a Strong Magnetic Field

SECOND PUBLIC EXAMINATION. Honour School of Physics Part C: 4 Year Course. Honour School of Physics and Philosophy Part C C3: CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS

Physics of Semiconductors (Problems for report)

Luminescence. Photoluminescence (PL) is luminescence that results from optically exciting a sample.

Electromagnetically Induced Transparency (EIT) via Spin Coherences in Semiconductor

Spin Transport in III-V Semiconductor Structures

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Chapter 3 Properties of Nanostructures

Tunneling Spectroscopy of Disordered Two-Dimensional Electron Gas in the Quantum Hall Regime

Femtosecond Spectral Hole Burning Spectroscopy as a Probe of Exciton Dynamics in Quantum Dots

Intensity / a.u. 2 theta / deg. MAPbI 3. 1:1 MaPbI 3-x. Cl x 3:1. Supplementary figures

Review of Optical Properties of Materials

Supplementary Figure 1 Interlayer exciton PL peak position and heterostructure twisting angle. a, Photoluminescence from the interlayer exciton for

Electron spins in nonmagnetic semiconductors

Saturation Absorption Spectroscopy of Rubidium Atom

Injection of Optically Generated Spins through Magnetic/Nonmagnetic Heterointerface: Ruling out Possible Detection Artifacts

Minimal Update of Solid State Physics

Luminescence Process

Spin Peierls Effect in Spin Polarization of Fractional Quantum Hall States. Surface Science (2) P.1040-P.1046

MAGNETIC FIELD DEPENDENT COUPLING OF VALENCE BAND STATES IN ASYMMETRIC DOUBLE QUANTUM WELLS

Semiconductor quantum dots

Lecture contents. Burstein shift Excitons Interband transitions in quantum wells Quantum confined Stark effect. NNSE 618 Lecture #15

Luminescence basics. Slide # 1

Exchange Mechanisms. Erik Koch Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum Jülich. lecture notes:

doi: /PhysRevLett

The energy level structure of low-dimensional multi-electron quantum dots

Electrical spin-injection into semiconductors

Magnetic control of valley pseudospin in monolayer WSe 2

Time Resolved Faraday Rotation Measurements of Spin Polarized Currents in Quantum Wells

Semiconductor device structures are traditionally divided into homojunction devices

Electronic structure of correlated electron systems. G.A.Sawatzky UBC Lecture

Atomic Structure and Processes

Quantum Mechanics. Exam 3. Photon(or electron) interference? Photoelectric effect summary. Using Quantum Mechanics. Wavelengths of massive objects

Spin-orbit Effects in Semiconductor Spintronics. Laurens Molenkamp Physikalisches Institut (EP3) University of Würzburg

Defense Technical Information Center Compilation Part Notice

SPINTRONICS. Waltraud Buchenberg. Faculty of Physics Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg

NiS - An unusual self-doped, nearly compensated antiferromagnetic metal [Supplemental Material]

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 26 Aug 2010

Electromagnetism II. Instructor: Andrei Sirenko Spring 2013 Thursdays 1 pm 4 pm. Spring 2013, NJIT 1

Electronic structure of correlated electron systems. Lecture 2

Supplementary Figure 1 Comparison of single quantum emitters on two type of substrates:

Supplementary Information: Electrically Driven Single Electron Spin Resonance in a Slanting Zeeman Field

Excitonic luminescence upconversion in a two-dimensional semiconductor

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 20 Mar 2008

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Experimental discovery of the spin-hall effect in Rashba spin-orbit coupled semiconductor systems

QUESTION BANK ON ATOMIC STRUCTURE

Atomic Term Symbols and Energy Splitting. λ=5890 Å

Spontaneous Magnetization in Diluted Magnetic Semiconductor Quantum Wells

Optical Control of Coherent Interactions between Electron Spins in InGaAs Quantum Dots

Optical Characterization of Solids

Deterministic Coherent Writing and Control of the Dark Exciton Spin using Short Single Optical Pulses

Luigi Paolasini

Supplementary Information

Fine Structure Splitting in the Optical Spectra of Single GaAs Quantum Dots

InAs quantum dots: Predicted electronic structure of free-standing versus GaAs-embedded structures

(002)(110) (004)(220) (222) (112) (211) (202) (200) * * 2θ (degree)

Supplementary Materials

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 13 Oct 2000

Exciton spectroscopy

Fabrication / Synthesis Techniques

Mn in GaAs: from a single impurity to ferromagnetic layers

J 12 J 23 J 34. Driving forces in the nano-magnetism world. Intra-atomic exchange, electron correlation effects: Inter-atomic exchange: MAGNETIC ORDER

Screening Model of Magnetotransport Hysteresis Observed in arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 27 Jul Bilayer Quantum Hall Systems

All optical quantum computation by engineering semiconductor. macroatoms. Irene D Amico. Dept. of Physics, University of York

arxiv: v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 6 Apr 2011

Observation of charged excitons in hole-doped carbon nanotubes using photoluminescence and absorption spectroscopy

A STUDY OF DYNAMIC CHARACTERIZATIONS OF GaAs/ALGaAs SELF-ASSEMBLED QUANTUM DOT LASERS

Transcription:

Single exciton spectroscopy of semimagnetic quantum dots arxiv:cond-mat/05085v [cond-mat.mes-hall] 9 Aug 005 J. Fernández-Rossier Instituto Universitario de Materiales de Alicante, Universidad de Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, 0690 Spain (Dated: February, 008) A photo-excited II-VI semiconductor nanocrystal doped with a few Mn spins is considered. The effects of spin-exciton interactions and the resulting multi-spin correlations on the photoluminescence are calculated by numerical diagonalization of the Hamiltonian, including exchange interaction between electrons, holes and Mn spins, as well as spin-orbit interaction. The results provide a unified description of recent experiments of photoluminesnce of dots with one and many Mn atoms as well as optically induced ferromagnetism in semimagnetic nanocrystals. PACS numbers: Control of the wave function of spins embedded in semiconducting materials is in the road-map of the quantum hardware development. Optical excitation and probing of single exciton confined in a nanometric region permits to manipulate the quantum state of the exciton spin,, or the spin degrees of freedom coupled to the excitons like nuclei 4, donor electrons 4,5,6 or Mn ions 5,7,8,9,0,,,,4. Recent reports 7,8,9 of optical detection of the photoluminescence (PL) of a single nanocrystal of II-VI semiconductor doped with a single Mn atom showed evidence of a one on one correspondence between the energy of the emitted photons and the quantum state of the Mn spin after photon emission. Substitutional Mn in (II,Mn)VI semiconductors is a neutral impurity 5 with 5 electrons in the open d shell that behave like a spin S = 5. Therefore, the experiment of ref. (7) is a proof of principle of the optical manipulation and detection of the quantum state of a single spin S = 5/. Several other groups have reported the fabrication and optical spectroscopy of single nanocrystals of II-VI semiconductors doped with tens of Mn atoms,,,4,6. The PL spectrum of one of these semimagnetic nanocrystal is broader than that of a pure dot 7,, and it shows strong sensitivity to the application of magnetic fields,, as a result of the exchange interaction of conduction band (CB) electrons and valence band (VB) holes with the Mn spins. Here, a quantum theory of the single exciton spectroscopy of a nanocrystal with a few Mn spins is presented. The goal is to provide a unified description of the PL spectra of nanocrystals with one 7,8,9 and many Mn atoms, with emphasis on how to extract information about the quantum state of the Mn spins from the PL spectra. With that aim, the standard Hamiltonian for semimagnetic nanocrystals is solved exactly for N Mn =,, and 4 Mn ions both when one exciton is present (excited state manifold, XMS) and absent ( ground state manifold, GSM). The optical transition rates between the GSM and XSM are calculated and PL spectra are obtained both in the Faraday and Voigt configurations for a range of situations. Our results agree very well with the PL experiments with dots with one Mn 7,8,9 and many,. Previous theory work reporting exact diagonalizations 8,9 have addressed single Mn dots with spherical shape, resulting in PL spectra different from those obtained here and reported experimentally 7,8. Hamiltonian. The standard Hamiltonian 5,7,8,9,0 for diluted magnetic semiconductors describes CB electrons and VB holes interacting with localized Mn spins ( M I ) via a local exchange interaction and coupling to an external magnetic field, B. For the results presented here the short range antiferromagnetic superexchange is not effective 0. Both CB electrons and VB holes are confined in all the spacial directions resulting in a discrete single particle spectrum. The Hamiltonian reads H = H 0 + H + H eh, where H 0 = gµ BB I M I and H = n,σ,σ ǫ h ν( B)d νd ν + ν I ( ǫ e n δ σ,σ g eµ BB τ σ,σ ) c n,σ c n,σ + ( M I J ese ( r I ) + J hsh ( r I ) In the absence of electron-hole (eh) pairs, the M I interact only with B. The first term in H describes the CB electrons confined in the nanocrystal orbital levels ψ n ( r) and coupled to the external magnetic field. The Pauli matrices are denoted by τ σ,σ and c n,σ stands for the CB electron creation operator. The second term describes the VB holes confined in the nanocrystal, including the spin orbit interaction, ; the operator d ν creates a VB hole in the spin-orbital φ ν ( r). The third and fourth term describe the exchange between Mn and CB electrons and VB holes, respectively. Both the CB-Mn and the VB-Mn exchange are local and couple the carrier spin density at the Mn location S e,h ( r I ) to M I. The eh exchange is described by H eh = J ehse S h. Direct eh Coulomb interaction and orbital magnetism are irrelevant in the small dots considered here 0. We consider dots whose single particle energy spacing is much larger than all the other intra-band energy scales of the Hamiltonian. The shape of the dot determines the degree of light hole (LH) heavy hole (HH) mixing of the VB single particle states which, in turn, determines the relative importance of the Ising and spin flip part of the hole-mn and hole-electron exchange interactions. A hard ) ()

wall cubic potential with dimensions L x, L y, L z conveniently describes the interplay between the shape of the dot and the single-hole states, although real dots probably have more complicated geometries. We always take L z < L x, L y and we consider light propagation along the z axis. The CB electron envelope functions are given by 0 ψ n 8 V Sin(k xx)sin(k y y)sin(k z z) where k i πni L i, i = x, y, z, V = L x L y L z and n i are positive integers. The description of the confined VB single particle states follows that of reference (): a zero dimensional version of the 6 band Kohn-Luttinger Hamiltonian. The envelope states for the single particle lowest energy doublet are ψ 0 ( r) ψ,, ( r), both for VB holes and CB electrons. The wave functions of the VB lowest energy doublet are + = c, + + c, and = K + where K is the time reversal operation and J, M are the standard light hole (LH) and heavy hole (HH) states at the Γ 8 point. If L x = L y LH-HH mixing vanishes (c = 0) and so they do the matrix elements ± S x,y h, resulting in a pure Ising (zz) hole-mn and eh exchange coupling. For 0 < L x L y < L z there is some HH-LH mixing (0 < c < c ) that, on top of the dominant Ising coupling, permits some spin flip (xx, yy) hole- Mn and eh interaction. In contrast with the VB holes, the CB electron-mn interaction is perfectly isotropic 0. The results shown here belong to 4 different dots with (L x, L y, L z ) (7,7,4) nm (dot #), (5,5,) nm (dot #), (7,5,) nm (dot #) and (7,.7,) (dot #4). The strength of the exchange coupling between the carriers and the Mn spins is j e,h (I) J e,h ψ 0 ( r I ). For a given dot the mean value of the exchange coupling is j e,h = J e,h V and the maximum value is 8 j e,h. For CdTe we have 5 J h =+60 mev nm and J e = 5meV nm. We take g e =.5 and g h = 0. 7. In order to establish the influence of the different exchange couplings in the PL spectra of dots with Mn, we first take J eh = 0 (fig. ) and then we study the effect of eh exchange (fig. a,b,c) The many body states are classified according to the number of excitons (N X = 0 for the GSM and N X = for the XSM) and to the number of Mn ions, N Mn. The number of states in the GSM of a given nanocrystal is (6) NMn. If only the lowest energy doublet of both the CB and VB states are kept, there are four possible exciton states, labeled by ± X and ± X following their total angular momentum, and the number of states in the XSM is 4 (6) NMn. The many-body states are found by standard numerical diagonalization of the Schrodinger equations H 0 G = E G G and (H 0 + H ) X = E X X. The GSM states only feature Mn spin coordinates whereas the XSM states include Mn spins, as well as CB electron and VB hole that occupy linear combinations of the single particle states described above. In the absence of magnetic field and superexchange all the GSM states are degenerate. In contrast, Ising hole-mn coupling of dot # lifts splits the 4 levels in 6 quartets, corresponding to the six possible relative orientations between the Mn and the hole spin along the z direction. Both electron-mn and electron-hole exchange coupling further split the 6 quartets into doublets. Depending on the relative size of J eh and J e the lowest energy state of the XSM is either ± X 5 or ± X 5. The diagonalizations show that the lowest energy states of the XSM of dots with N M =,,4 describe fully polarized Mn spins along L z. Hence, the exact many-spin wave functions of the Mn coupled to zero dimensional exciton feature ferromagnetic correlations, very much like bulk carrier mediated ferromagnetic order and in agreement with experimental observations in photoexcited nanocrystals 4. Transitions from the XSM to the GSM are possible via spontaneous emission of a photon with the adequate energy ω and polarization. We consider circularly polarized photons. The rate of spontaneous emission of a photon of energy ω = E X E G from the state X to the state G is given by the Weisskopf- Wigner expression Γ GX = 4ω 4πǫ 0 c G P ± X where P ± = ν,n,σ ν e(x ± iy) nσ d ν c n,σ + h.c. is the second quantization representation of the interband electric dipole operator that yields the standard optical selection rules. Standard optical selection rules forbid photon emission from ± X states. Since the electric dipole operator does not affect the Mn d electrons, the Mn spin part of the collective wave function does not change during the recombination process. As a result, most of the GSM to XSM transitions that are allowed by the standard optical selection rule but are forbidden due to the orthogonality of the spin part of GSM and the XSM states. This optical spin blockade, reminiscent of the spin blockade well characterized in single electron transport 4, implies a huge limitation to the otherwise large set of XSM to GSM transitions. The PL spectrum is calculated by statistical weighting of the initial states X : I PL (ω) = X,G P(X)Γ GX δ ( ω (E X E G )) where P(X) is the occupation probability of the XSM state X. In general the calculation of P(X) would involve the determination of the non-equilibrium steady state density matrix 7,8. The experimental results of reference 7 support approximating P(X) as a thermal distribution function with an effective temperature. In the following we show PL spectra calculated following the above recipe. The spectral lines are broadened using gaussians with a FWHM of either γ =50µeV or γ =400µeV, adapted to the experimental photodetector resolution of references (7) and () respectively. Single spin optical spectroscopy calculations are shown in fig.. The zero field PL for nanocrystal # with a single Mn impurity and effective temperatures, 0.5 and mev (6 and 4 Kelvin) is shown in fig. a. The model accounts quantitatively for the experimental observations 7 : only 6 lines are clearly seen, in spite of the fact that the XSM has non degenerate lines, that occupy a spec-

.LPehtceffatonseodnipsnMdelpuocylkaewehtahtnerapasitI./0=ShtiwylevitcelocgnivahebsmotanMrofderugfifogolanaehterataht,skaepserutaefmurtcepsLPeht.0=rnehW.kaepediwselrutaefrehtarasiLPeht5.0=rtA.58.0=rofneslitseraskaep6esehT.)/5=S(htiwtengamelgnisaekilevahebtahtsmotanMehtfoZSevitcelocehtfosnoitatneiroelbisop+Sehthtiwsetatsmutnauqotgnidnopserocsenil6htiwmurtcepsLPnaelcaswohs=resacirtemysehT.)gotdsgfi(.0otmorfmorfdeiravsi ),r (0ψ )r (0ψ =rybdenfiedsnoimrefehtotgnilpuocevitalerehtahtos,segnahcdrihtehtdna)vem8.0=)(hj=)(hj(delpuocylacitnedierahcihwfowt,smotanmhtiwtodaehtgniredisnoctratsew,dragersihtni.sesaercnismotanmforebmunehtsaevlovetodehtfoartcepslpehtwoh:repapsihtfoemehtlartnecehtserdaylanfiew.9dehsilbupyltnecerstnemirepxehtotlacitnediylevit-atilauqdnatnetsisnocsierutcipelohweseht.relamsignilpuocgnisinm-elohehthcihwrofskaeplartnecehtniyltsom,deziralopylraenilsilpehtub,derevocersierutcurtskaep6ehtereht.)vem.0=hj(nmdelpuocylgnortsahtiwtodemasehtotsdnopseroclenaprewoleht.devlosertonsia.sgfifoerutcurtskaepehtdnadeziralopylraenilsilpeht.gniximh-hlgnortsadnanoticxehtot)hj5.0=ej,vem6.0=hj(delpuocylkaewnmaotsdnopseroclpeldimeht.).gfihtiwderapmoc(skaepygrenewolfoecnaraepaehtnigni-tluser,snoticxekradehtstfihsdernoitcaretnihegnisi.gniximh-hlemoserutaef#tod.vem=hejdnamotanmelgnisahtiwmehtfola,)c,b(4#todna)a(#todotgnidnopserocartcepslpehtwohsewc-aerugfini.snoticxekradnathgirbtahwemosximsnoitcaretnihednanm-elohesrevsnartehtdnaegnahcxenm-nortcelefonoitcadenibmoceht.gnilpuocnm-elohgnisiehthtiwsetepmocgniximsiht,nmfoecneserpehtni.artcepsdeziralopylraenilotnignitlusersnoticxe.sgnilpuocreirac-nmevitalerehtfonoitcnufasaseitirupminmhtiw#todrofmurtcepslpdlefiorezg-d.)cdnab(4#dna)a(#stodroflpnmelgnisfolpehtnoegnahcxehehtdnagniximh-lehtfoecneuflni:slenaprepu.)enilnoroloc(:.gif)d()e()f()g()c()-(σ,)+(σ.0=r5.0=r58.0=r=r)b()a()vem( 0E-E0--)Vem( 0E-E0--)Vem( 0E-E0--)Vem( 0E-E5.05.0-YΠ X Π )Vem( 0E-E5.05.0-).u.a( LP)Vem( 0E-E0--).u.a( LP)Vem( 0E-E5.05.0-dna+sexim,gniximH-HLsierehtfielbisopylnosihcihw,noitcaretnihehtfotrapifl-nipsehtsaerehw,snoticxekradnathgirbstilpsnoitcaretnihehtfotrapgnisIehT.erugfifostluserehtnitnesba,noit-caretniegnahcxehehtfotceffehtredisnocwoneW.0nidetroperepahsLPehtrofstnuocadnaderugfininesisihT.d.gfininwohsa,tneicfi-feselhcumedakcolbnipsgnikam zs xs otlanoitrop-orpwonsi X P G xirtameht.tnanimodsignilpuocgnisinm-elohehtdnanoitceridtahtnidenipsielohehtfonipsehtesuaceb,rotarepozsehtfosetatsnegiehthtiwpalrevognortsevahsetatsmsxehtsaerehw,rota-reponipsxsehtfosetatsnegiehterasetatsmsgeht.rediwhcumsimurtcepsehtdna,ylacitsardefiidomsilpehtfoepahseht.tnereffidylbakramersi,)0,0,xb(=b,noitarugfinoctgiovehtnilpdetaluclaceht.ecnednopseroceno-no-enoemasehtsahesacdlefiorezeht.5 =zsot5+=zsmorfgniogsetatsnmlanfiotdnopserocesacyadarafehtnilpehtmorfskaepxisehtygrenehgihotwolmorfgniog,ralucitrapni.repapsihtfotlusertnatropmidnocesehtsidnaetatsnmlanfiehtot)noitaziralopdnaygrene(etatsnotohpehtpamotstimreptcafsiht.msgehtforebmemeno,tsomta,htiwnotohpdeziralopylralucricnevigaivdelpuocsimsxehtforebmemhcaewohnesiti.)sdnomaidilos(+σdna)selcricserauqsnepo( σrofxgγotlanoitroporpsislobmysehtfoezisehtereht.c.gfiehtni,b.gfifomurtcepsyadarafehtrof,nevigsinoitamrofnitaht.noitisnartlacitpoehtnimsgehtfoetatslanfiehtuobanoitamrofnisdleiyskaep6esehtfoenoniygrenednanoitaziralopnevigahtiwnotohpafonoitcetedeht.0,7stnemirepxehthtiwtnemergadogni,)zb,0,0(=b,noitarugfi-nocyadarafehtnidleficitengamafonoitacilpanopu)murtcepsrewol,b.gfi(gnitilpstnednepednoitaziral-opaogrednusenil6eht.ledomriehtfogniximh-hltnereffidehtoteud)9,8(krowyroehtsuoiverpfoesohtmorfreffidsenilehtforebmuneht.vemfoegnarlart.sesac)d(tgi.ovdna)c(yadarafehtrofxgγ)d,c(.snoitarugfinoc)0,0,t5(tgiovdna)t5,0,0(yadarafehtnilpotengam)b(.tfoseulavowtdnamotanmhtiw#todroflp)a(.)enilnoroloc(:.gifyadaraftgiov)d()c()b()a()+( σ)-( σmsg654msx96074 T= mev T=0.5 mev GSM - -0.5 0 0.5 6 5 4 4 7 0 6 9 XSM -.5 - -0.5 0 0.5.5

4 The results of figure d-g suggest that a few Mn atoms, strongly coupled to the exciton could be responsible of the main features of the PL signal observed in earlier experiments. In ref. () the PL spectrum of single semimagnetic nanocrystals show a zero field σ + line with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 5 mev that red shifts and narrows upon application of a magnetic field in the Faraday configuration,,. This has motivated statistical interpretation of the PL spectrum of single semimagnetic nanocrystals,, linking the PL linewidth to the magnetic statistical fluctuations. In such an approach the PL FWHM has been shown to scale with k BT V. On the other side, it is apparent that the PL spectrum of a single Mn impurity 7 lies in a window of order I = 5 ( j h(i) + j e (I) ), which scales like V. The PL linewidth of fig. also scales with I I V. We have explored whether the quantum approach with N Mn = and 4 can model PL spectra like those of references (,,). The justification lies in the distribution of couplings j h (I), shown in fig. a for Cd 0.99 Mn 0.0 Te (dot #) obtained by random generation of 00 realizations of the Mn disorder. Such a dot has N Mn =8 and j h = 0. mev. However, 65 % of the Mn have j h < j h and, in average, the 4 Mn with largest coupling have j h > j h. We calculate the PL taking the 4 Mn atoms with the largest overlap to the carrier wave function, for a randomly selected Mn disorder realization. Their j h are.69,.66,., and 0.45 mev. In figure b we show the corresponding σ + PL spectrum for values of the magnetic field going from zero to T in the Faraday configuration. We take γ = 0.4meV and T = mev. As in the experiments, the σ + PL red shifts as B z goes up. The featureless zero field PL spectrum (with a FWHM of 5 mev) develops, as B z increases narrow structures, as reported experimentally. The narrowing is also seen in fig. c, that shows the PL of dot # with Mn atoms, with values of j h closer to the average (0.9,0.40 and 0.44 mev), with T = mev and γ = 0.4 mev. In fig. d we show how the corresponding FWHM decreases both upon cooling and upon increasing B z. The former is due to the reduction of the spectral range of the occupied states in the XSM, resulting as well in a red shift thas has been observed experimentally. The magnetic field produces a similar effect. In conclusion, the problem of a few Mn atoms interacting with a single exciton in a quantum dot is solved via numerical diagonalization of the Hamiltonian including electron-mn, hole-mn, electron-hole exchange as well as spin-orbit interactions and the correponding PL spectra are calculated. The model accounts for a series of recent reports with the PL of CdTe dots doped with a single Mn atom and permits to link the quantum state of one Mn spin to the detection of a photon with a given energy and polarization. The crucial ingredient for this one on one correspondence is the anisotropy of the hole-mn interaction, due to strong spin-orbit interaction for the holes. The model reproduce qualitatively the PL spectra of single dots with presumably tens of Mn atoms,, with just and 4 Mn spins strongly coupled to the exciton and with different coupling strengths. This might indicate that the width of the PL spectra coming from a single semimagnetic dot might arise from a few Mn atoms strongly coupled to the exciton rather than from statistical fluctuations of many Mn atoms. L. Besombes and H. Mariette are acknowledged for sharing their data before publication. Fruitful discussions with J. J. Palacios and funding from Grant FIS004056 and the Ramon y Cajal Program (MEC, Spain) are acknowledged. This work has been partly funded by FEDER funds. Histogram FWHM 0.5 0 0 4 6 8 j h /<j h >.5 0.5 (a) (d) 0 0 4 6 8 0 B z (T) (b) 0T T -0-5 0 5 (c) 0T 0T - - - 0 FIG. : (Color online). (a) Normalized histogram of Mn-hole coupling. The dashed line is the integrated histogram. (b) PL spectrum for 4 Mn impurities (see text) for several values of B z. (c) Idem for Mn impurities. (d) FWHM for as a function of B z and T=,, and 0.5 mev (top to bottom). B. E. Kane, Nature (London), 9, (998). D. Loss et al., Phys. Rev. A 57, 0 (998). N. H. Bonadeo et al., Science 8,47 (998) Xiaoqin Li et al. Science 0, 809 (00). 4 F. Jelezko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 050 (004) 5 J. Bao, et al., Nature Mater., 75 (00). 6 P. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. B69, 0750 (004) 7 L. Besombes et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 0740 (004) 8 L. Besombes et al. Phys. Rev. B. 7, 607 (005) 9 Y. Léger et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95,04740 (005) 0 Y. Léger et al., submitted to PRB A. A. Maksimov et al. Phys. Rev. B6, R7767 (000) G. Bacher et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 70 (00) P. S. Dorozhkin et al., Phys. Rev. B 68, 95 (00) 4 S. Mackowski et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 7 (004). 5 J. K. Furdyna, J. Appl. Phys 64 R9 (988).

5 6 S. C. Erwin et al., Nature 46, 9 (005) 7 A. Efros, E. Rashba, M. Rosen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 0660 (00) 8 A. O. Govorov, Phys. Rev. B 70, 05 (004) A. O. Govorov and A. V. Kalameitsev Phys. Rev. B 7, 058 (005) 9 A. K. Bhattacharjee and J. Pérez-Conde Phys. Rev. B68,0450 (00) 0 J. Fernández-Rossier and L. Brey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9 70 (004) F. V. Kyrychenko and J. Kossut, Phys. Rev. B 70, 057 (004) J.M. Luttinger, W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 97 869 (955) H. Ohno, Science 8, 95 (998). T. Dietl et al., Science 87 09 (000). 4 J. J. Palacios et. al., Phys. Rev. B50 5760 (994)