Structural Calculations For:

Similar documents
HELIODYNE SOLAR COLLECTOR RACK STRUCTURES FOR HELIODYNE, INC. Structural calculations. Gobi 410 at 45 degrees. for WCM HELIODYNE RACK

Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures

Beam Design - FLOOR JOIST

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.

Beam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S

Beam Design - Awning

Beam Design - Pine Tree

Beam Design - Trotin Project

Earthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: PNEUTEK, INC.

Structural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage Aluminum

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of

Dr. Ceasar Hearne. Structural Calculations. Project Address: 1700 East 3000 North, Layton, Utah

QUAKE BRAKE TM MODEL QBC-12 SEISMIC SWAY BRACING KIT FEATURING

*Refer to IBC Section , applicable when fall protection is required. Glass stresses are designed for a safety factor of of 4.0 (IBC ).

For sunshades using the Zee blades wind loads are reduced by 10 psf.

GENERAL INFORMATION FOR COLUMN BASE REACTIONS

Allowable Design Stresses (psi)

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 ( **) Unit: ZF180

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of

10012 Creviston DR NW Gig Harbor, WA fax

Structural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage

CH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES TRUSS ANALYSIS. Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20. First: determine loads in various members

2018 WFCM Changes. Wood Frame Construction Manual for One- and Two-Family Dwellings (STD350)

Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures. Dead Load. Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake. Load Combinations ASD LRFD

1 Exterior Wall Members & Accessories

1 Exterior Wall Members & Accessories

MAXIMUM SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM ASD LOADS, psf SINGLE SPAN DOUBLE SPAN TRIPLE SPAN GAGE

The first NDS (1944) was based on allowable stress design (ASD). Copyright American Wood Council. All rights reserved.

Sway Column Example. PCA Notes on ACI 318


Section Downloads. Section Downloads. Handouts & Slides can be printed. Other documents cannot be printed Course binders are available for purchase

2018 NDS Changes. National Design Specification for Wood Construction (STD120)

24' SEE DWG FOR SCREWING 2 PLY TOGETHER NOTE: FLOOR TRUSSES 19.2" O.C. **ALL FLOOR TRUSSES ARE THE SAME** 1'5"6 1'7"3 1'7"3 1'7"3 1'7"3 1'7"3

World Shelters. U-Dome 200. Dome Shelter. Engineering Report: Dome Structure ER October South G St., Suite 3 Arcata, CA USA

Seismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code

SIP PANEL DESIGN EXAMPLES USING NTA IM 14 TIP 02 SIP DESIGN GUIDE AND LISTING REPORT DATA

DESIGN EXAMPLES APPENDIX A

Section Downloads. Design Process. Design Principles Outline. Basic Design Principles. Design Process. Section 06: Design Principles.

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

Openings for Wood Framed Shear Walls

Entrance exam Master Course

host structure (S.F.D.)

A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING SECTION: STEEL ROOF DECKING REPORT HOLDER: NEW MILLENNIUM BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT

EXTERIOR FRAMING EXTERIOR FRAMING

Structural, Snow & Wind Loading Appraisal Report

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

Wood Design. fv = shear stress fv-max = maximum shear stress Fallow = allowable stress Fb = tabular bending strength = allowable bending stress

Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Headers: Example Problems

PEER/SSC Tall Building Design. Case study #2

DES140: Designing for Lateral-Torsional Stability in Wood Members

Innovative Products February 2016

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT. WHISPER ft GUYED WIND TURBINE TEP # Revision 0 November 6, 2006 PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT.

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Engineering EVALUATION OF LIMIT DESIGN FOR EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT MASONRY WALLS

2/23/ WIND PRESSURE FORMULA 2. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE STRESS 3. FATIGUE DESIGN

Standard Specification for Computing Reference Resistance of Wood-Based Materials and Structural Connections for Load and Resistance Factor Design 1

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Structural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage

STRUCTURAL VERIFICATION OF A 60.7 M DOME ROOF FOR TANK FB 2110

ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE HEADWALLS AASHTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN

Journey Through a Project: Shake-table Test of a Reinforced Masonry Structure

Edward C. Robison, PE, SE. 02 January Architectural Metal Works ATTN: Sean Wentworth th ST Emeryville, CA 94608

Huntly Christie 1/26/2018 Christie Lites 100 Carson Street Toronto, ON M8W3R9

The following pages are an excerpt from the North American Product Technical Guide, Volume 1: Direct Fastening Technical Guide, Edition 18.


Preliminary Examination - Dynamics

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge

AISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I)

Feeney Architectural Products Design-Rail Glass Infill 09/09/2010 Page 1 of 51

DL CMU wall = 51.0 (lb/ft 2 ) 0.7 (ft) DL beam = 2.5 (lb/ft 2 ) 18.0 (ft) 5

Special edition paper

ES230 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS

SEAoT State Conference Seminar Topics. Early knowledge needed. 11/5/2009. Wind Versus Seismic Which Controls? The Code

Example 1 - Single Headed Anchor in Tension Away from Edges BORRADOR. Calculations and Discussion

Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3

Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy

8 ft. 5 k 5 k 5 k 5 k. F y = 36 ksi F t = 21 ksi F c = 10 ksi. 6 ft. 10 k 10 k

Sheathing Braced Design of Wall Studs July 2011 Update. for

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017

Appendix K Design Examples

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

ANSI/SPRI ES-1 Test Reports UL Classified Products

NAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: Law of Sines:

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS

Suspended high-rise. Suspended high-rise Copyright G G Schierle, press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 1

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

S TRUCTUR A L PR E- A N A LYSIS TA B LES

EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design

Chapter 7 INTERNAL FORCES

Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams

NICE-PACK ALCOHOL PREP ROOM PLATFORM CALCULATIONS

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3

RETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil)

Transcription:

Structural Calculations For: Project: Address: Job No. Revision: Date: 1400 N. Vasco Rd. Livermore, CA 94551 D031014 Delta 1 - Plan Check May 8, 2015 Client: Ferreri & Blau

MEMBER REPORT Roof, Typical Roof Joist with Mechanical 1 piece(s) 20" TJI 560 @ 32" OC PASSED All locations are measured from the outside face of left support (or left cantilever end). All dimensions are horizontal. Design Results Actual @ Location Allowed Result LDF Load: Combination (Pattern) Member Reaction (lbs) 1926 @ 33' 6 1/2" 1926 (2.80") Passed (100%) 1.25 1.0 D + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) Shear (lbs) 1926 @ 33' 6 1/2" 4181 Passed (46%) 1.25 1.0 D + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) Moment (Ft-lbs) 16955 @ 16' 6" 20206 Passed (84%) 1.25 1.0 D + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) Live Load Defl. (in) 0.786 @ 16' 10 1/2" 1.667 Passed (L/509) -- 1.0 D + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) Total Load Defl. (in) 1.765 @ 17' 1/16" 2.223 Passed (L/227) -- 1.0 D + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) Deflection criteria: LL (L/240) and TL (L/180). Bracing (Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 4' 9 7/8" o/c unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. System : Roof Member Type : Joist Building Use : Residential Building Code : IBC Design Methodology : ASD Member Pitch: 0.25/12 Bearing Length Loads to Supports (lbs) Supports Total Available Required Dead Blocking Panels are assumed to carry no loads applied directly above them and the full load is applied to the member being designed. At hanger supports, the Total Bearing dimension is equal to the width of the material that is supporting the hanger ¹ See Connector grid below for additional information and/or requirements. Roof Live Total Accessories 1 - Beveled Plate - DF 3.50" 3.50" 2.55" 943 900 1843 Blocking 2 - Hanger on 20" DF beam 3.50" Hanger¹ 2.80" 1049 904 1953 See note ¹ Connector: Simpson Strong-Tie Connectors Support Model Seat Length Top Nails Face Nails Member Nails Accessories 2 - Face Mount Hanger Connector not found N/A N/A N/A N/A Dead Roof Live Loads Location Spacing (0.90) (non-snow: 1.25) Comments 1 - Uniform (PSF) 0 to 33' 10" 32" 16.0 20.0 Roof 2 - Point (lb) 16' 6" N/A 274-3 - Point (lb) 23' 6" N/A 274 - Weyerhaeuser Notes Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of its products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software. Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for installation details. (www.woodbywy.com) Accessories (Rim Board, Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks) are not designed by this software. Use of this software is not intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction. The designer of record, builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project. Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards. The product application, input design loads, dimensions and support information have been provided by Forte Software Operator Forte Software Operator Justen Peek DP Advanced Engineering Inc. (925) 584-4259 jp@advengineering.com Job Notes 5/12/2015 5:43:02 PM Forte v4.6, Design Engine: V6.1.1.5 Roof Joist Calcs.4te Page 1 of 1

Drag / Collector Force Diagram Generator INPUT DATA TOTAL SHEAR FORCE (ASD) F p = 23.727 kips NUMBER OF SEGMENTS n = 3 Segment 1 2 3 Length, ft 14.75 39.25 13 Shear Wall? YES NO YES ANALYSIS TOTAL DRAG LENGTH L drag = 67 ft TOTAL SHEAR WALL LENGTH L wall = 27.75 ft DIAPHRAGM SHEAR STRESS v diaphragm = F p / v drag = 354 plf SHEAR WALL SHEAR STRESS v shear wall = F p / v wall = 855 plf Section Point 0 1 2 3 Distance, ft 0 14.75 54 67 Axial Force 0 7.39-6.51 0.00 Drag Axial Force, kips 10 8 6 4 2 0-2 -4-6 -8 Distance, ft DRAG / COLLECTOR FORCE DIAGRAM SHEAR WALL & DRAG ELEVATION

Drag / Collector Force Diagram Generator INPUT DATA TOTAL SHEAR FORCE (ASD) F p = 23.568 kips NUMBER OF SEGMENTS n = 2 Segment 1 2 Length, ft 26.25 40 Shear Wall? NO YES ANALYSIS TOTAL DRAG LENGTH L drag = 66.25 ft TOTAL SHEAR WALL LENGTH L wall = 40 ft DIAPHRAGM SHEAR STRESS v diaphragm = F p / v drag = 356 plf SHEAR WALL SHEAR STRESS v shear wall = F p / v wall = 589 plf Section Point 0 1 2 Distance, ft 0 26.25 66.25 Axial Force 0-9.34 0.00 Drag Axial Force, kips 2 0-2 -4-6 -8-10 Distance, ft DRAG / COLLECTOR FORCE DIAGRAM SHEAR WALL & DRAG ELEVATION

Drag / Collector Force Diagram Generator INPUT DATA TOTAL SHEAR FORCE (ASD) F p = 19.975 kips NUMBER OF SEGMENTS n = 8 Segment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Length, ft 13 12.75 18 14.5 44 8.5 14.33 9 Shear Wall? NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES ANALYSIS TOTAL DRAG LENGTH TOTAL SHEAR WALL LENGTH L drag = 134.08 ft L wall = 44.75 ft DIAPHRAGM SHEAR STRESS v diaphragm = F p / v drag = 149 plf SHEAR WALL SHEAR STRESS v shear wall = F p / v wall = 446 plf Section Point 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Distance, ft 0 13 25.75 43.75 58.25 102.25 110.75 125.08 134.08 Axial Force 0-1.94 1.86-0.83 3.49-3.07-0.54-2.68 0.00 Drag Axial Force, kips 4 3 2 1 0-1 -2-3 -4 Distance, ft DRAG / COLLECTOR FORCE DIAGRAM SHEAR WALL & DRAG ELEVATION

Drag / Collector Force Diagram Generator INPUT DATA TOTAL SHEAR FORCE (ASD) F p = 23.287 kips NUMBER OF SEGMENTS n = 3 Segment 1 2 3 Length, ft 68.67 16 49.75 Shear Wall? NO YES NO ANALYSIS TOTAL DRAG LENGTH L drag = 134.42 ft TOTAL SHEAR WALL LENGTH L wall = 16 ft DIAPHRAGM SHEAR STRESS v diaphragm = F p / v drag = 173 plf SHEAR WALL SHEAR STRESS v shear wall = F p / v wall = 1455 plf Section Point 0 1 2 3 Distance, ft 0 68.67 84.67 134.42 Axial Force 0-11.90 8.62 0.00 Drag Axial Force, kips 10 5 0-5 -10-15 Distance, ft DRAG / COLLECTOR FORCE DIAGRAM SHEAR WALL & DRAG ELEVATION

Drag / Collector Force Diagram Generator INPUT DATA TOTAL SHEAR FORCE (ASD) F p = 4.032 kips NUMBER OF SEGMENTS n = 9 Segment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Length, ft 16 3 16 3 16 3 16 3 16 Shear Wall? NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO ANALYSIS TOTAL DRAG LENGTH L drag = 92 ft TOTAL SHEAR WALL LENGTH L wall = 12 ft DIAPHRAGM SHEAR STRESS v diaphragm = F p / v drag = 44 plf SHEAR WALL SHEAR STRESS v shear wall = F p / v wall = 336 plf Section Point 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Distance, ft 0 16 19 35 38 54 57 73 76 92 Axial Force 0-0.70 0.18-0.53 0.35-0.35 0.53-0.18 0.70 0.00 Drag Axial Force, kips 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0-0.2-0.4-0.6-0.8 Distance, ft DRAG / COLLECTOR FORCE DIAGRAM SHEAR WALL & DRAG ELEVATION

PROJECT: CLIENT: Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D031014 CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE GOVERNING CODE: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: California Building Code, 2013 Edition New HVAC Unit on Roof Lateral Load System - Wood Framed Shear Walls LATERAL DESIGN CRITERIA: SEISMIC & SITE DATA - MCE MAP VALUES Ss.... 2.206 % g S 1.... 0.778 % g Site Class D Site coefficients and adjusted maximum considered eq. spectral response accel. parameters Fa.... 1.000 Fv.... 1.500 S MS =FaS S 2.206 (EQ. 16-37) S M1 =FvS 1 1.167 (EQ. 16-38) Design spectral response acceleration parameters. S DS =(2/3)S MS 1.471 g (EQ. 16-39) S D1 =(2/3)S M1 0.778 g (EQ. 16-40) Importance Factor... 1.0 SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY BASED ON SHORT-PERIOD RESPONSE ACCELERATIONS: VALUE OF S DS 1 OR 11 111 1V S1 IS GREATER THAN.75 S DS < 0.167g A A A USE CATAGORY E 0.167g S DS < 0.33g B B C PER CBC 1613.5.6 0.33g S DS < 0.50g C C D USE CATEGORY D 0.50g S DS D D D USE CATEGORY D SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY BASED ON 1-SEC RESPONSE ACCELERATIONS: VALUE OF S D1 S D1 < 0.067g 0.067g S D1 < 0.133g 0.133g S D1 < 0.20g 0.20g S D1 1 OR 11 111 1V S1 IS GREATER THAN 0.75 A A A USE CATAGORY E B B C PER CBC 1613.5.6 C C D USE CATEGORY D D D D USE CATEGORY D

PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D031014 CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SEISMIC DESIGN FORCE (48HC-05): 4 ASCE 7-10 Table 13.6-1, a p 2.5 ASCE 7-10 Table 13.6-1, R p 6.0 Height of Equipment, Z 16.0 ft Height of Roof, h 16.0 ft Weight of Equipment, W P 590.0 lbs 0.4a P S DS W F P P = [1+2(Z/h)] (R P /I P ) F P-MAX = 1.6S DS W P I P 434 1388 lbs lbs F P-min = 0.3S DS W P I P 260 lbs 2.0 F P-DESIGN = F P 434 lbs F v-design = 0.2S DS W P 174 lbs WIND DESIGN FORCE: Exposure Type C 3 q h = 0.00256*K z *K zt *K d *V 2 23.70 lb/sf K Z = ASCE 7-10 Table 29.3-1 0.85 K Zt = ASCE 7-10 Section 26.8.2 1.0 K d = ASCE 7-10 Table 26.6-1 0.9 V= Basic Wind Speed 110 mph (GC r ) h = ASCE 7-10 Section 29.5.1 1.90 (GC r ) v = ASCE 7-10 Section 29.5.1 1.50 A f = Area of Equipment 21.4 sq-ft A r = Area of Equipment 24.1 sq-ft F h = q h (GC r ) h A f 962 lbs F v = q h (GC r ) v A r 858 lbs

PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: OVERTURNING DESIGN: Equipment Dimensions: Depth, D= 3.90 ft Length, L= 6.20 ft Height, H= 3.45 ft Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D031014 CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SEISMIC: Worst Case Uplift Reaction Load Case: 0.6D+0.7E R 1 = 18 lbs Net Uplift, Anchors Required Worst Case Downward Reaction Load Case: 1.0D+0.7E R 2 = -369 lbs WIND: Worst Case Uplift Reaction Load Case: 0.6D+0.6W R 1 = 336 lbs Net Uplift, Anchors Required Worst Case Downward Reaction Load Case: 1.0D+0.6W R 2 = -293 lbs

PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D031014 CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ANCHORAGE RESULTS FOR UNIT TO CURB: The new unit is to be installed with (4) 5/8" diameter lag screws, (1) in each corner, embedded 4" into 4x6 purlin ALLOWABLE DOWEL SHEAR VALUES ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUE PER 2012 NDS TABLE 11K ANCHOR DIAMETER 0.625 4 0.5 1200 704 Minimum embedment 4" Load Duration increase taken as, C D =1.6 for seismic loading VERIFY CAPACITY EXCEEDS DEMAND: Number of Bolts in Shear= 4 Capacity Perpendicular to Grain= 704 lbs per bolt Required Capacity Perpendicular to Grain= 144 lbs per bolt ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL VALUES ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL VALUE PER 2012 NDS TABLE 11.2A ANCHOR DIAMETER EMBEDMENT DEPTH EMBEDMENT DEPTH SPECIFIC GRAVITY, G SPECIFIC GRAVITY ALLOWABLE SHEAR PARALLEL TO GRAIN (LBS) ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL* 0.625 4 0.50 1788 *Unthreaded upper 1.5" of embedment ignored for allowable withdrawal Load Duration increase taken as, C D =1.6 for seismic loading VERIFY CAPACITY EXCEEDS NEW DEMAND: Number of Bolts in Withdrawal= 2 Capacity= 1788 lbs per anchor Required Uplift= 168 lbs per anchor ALLOWABLE SHEAR PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN (LBS) VERIFY CAPACITY FOR COMBINED SHEAR AND TENSION: ALLOWABLE DESIGN VALUE IN DIRECTION ALPHA PER NDS EQN 11.4-1 W'p 1788 LBS Z' 704 LBS a 49 DEG (W'p)Z' Capacity = Z'a = =1081 LBS (W'p)cos 2 a + Z' sin 2 a Required =221 LBS Force Ratio =0.20 Design OK

PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D031014 CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SEISMIC DESIGN FORCE (48HC-08): 4 ASCE 7-10 Table 13.6-1, a p 2.5 ASCE 7-10 Table 13.6-1, R p 6.0 Height of Equipment, Z 16.0 ft Height of Roof, h 16.0 ft Weight of Equipment, W P 925.0 lbs 0.4a P S DS W F P P = [1+2(Z/h)] (R P /I P ) F P-MAX = 1.6S DS W P I P 680 2177 lbs lbs F P-min = 0.3S DS W P I P 408 lbs 2.0 F P-DESIGN = F P 680 lbs F v-design = 0.2S DS W P 272 lbs WIND DESIGN FORCE: Exposure Type C 3 q h = 0.00256*K z *K zt *K d *V 2 23.70 lb/sf K Z = ASCE 7-10 Table 29.3-1 0.85 K Zt = ASCE 7-10 Section 26.8.2 1.0 K d = ASCE 7-10 Table 26.6-1 0.9 V= Basic Wind Speed 110 mph (GC r ) h = ASCE 7-10 Section 29.5.1 1.90 (GC r ) v = ASCE 7-10 Section 29.5.1 1.50 A f = Area of Equipment 30.2 sq-ft A r = Area of Equipment 36.4 sq-ft F h = q h (GC r ) h A f 1360 lbs F v = q h (GC r ) v A r 1294 lbs

PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: OVERTURNING DESIGN: Equipment Dimensions: Depth, D= 4.96 ft Length, L= 7.34 ft Height, H= 4.12 ft Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D031014 CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SEISMIC: Worst Case Uplift Reaction Load Case: 0.6D+0.7E R 1 = 15 lbs Net Uplift, Anchors Required Worst Case Downward Reaction Load Case: 1.0D+0.7E R 2 = -565 lbs WIND: Worst Case Uplift Reaction Load Case: 0.6D+0.6W R 1 = 449 lbs Net Uplift, Anchors Required Worst Case Downward Reaction Load Case: 1.0D+0.6W R 2 = -413 lbs

PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D031014 CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ANCHORAGE RESULTS FOR UNIT TO CURB: The new unit is to be installed with (4) 5/8" diameter lag screws, (1) in each corner, embedded 4" into 4x6 purlin ALLOWABLE DOWEL SHEAR VALUES ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUE PER 2012 NDS TABLE 11K ANCHOR DIAMETER 0.625 4 0.5 1200 704 Minimum embedment 4" Load Duration increase taken as, C D =1.6 for seismic loading VERIFY CAPACITY EXCEEDS DEMAND: Number of Bolts in Shear= 4 Capacity Perpendicular to Grain= 704 lbs per bolt Required Capacity Perpendicular to Grain= 204 lbs per bolt ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL VALUES ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL VALUE PER 2012 NDS TABLE 11.2A ANCHOR DIAMETER EMBEDMENT DEPTH EMBEDMENT DEPTH SPECIFIC GRAVITY, G SPECIFIC GRAVITY ALLOWABLE SHEAR PARALLEL TO GRAIN (LBS) ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL* 0.625 4 0.50 1788 *Unthreaded upper 1.5" of embedment ignored for allowable withdrawal Load Duration increase taken as, C D =1.6 for seismic loading VERIFY CAPACITY EXCEEDS NEW DEMAND: Number of Bolts in Withdrawal= 2 Capacity= 1788 lbs per anchor Required Uplift= 225 lbs per anchor ALLOWABLE SHEAR PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN (LBS) VERIFY CAPACITY FOR COMBINED SHEAR AND TENSION: ALLOWABLE DESIGN VALUE IN DIRECTION ALPHA PER NDS EQN 11.4-1 W'p 1788 LBS Z' 704 LBS a 48 DEG (W'p)Z' Capacity = Z'a = =1054 LBS (W'p)cos 2 a + Z' sin 2 a Required =304 LBS Force Ratio =0.29 Design OK