Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Similar documents
Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. Principles of Space Systems Design

MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. Principles of Space Systems Design

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Course Overview/Orbital Mechanics

Robotic Mobility Above the Surface

ENAE 791 Course Overview

Robotic Mobility Above the Surface

Lecture D30 - Orbit Transfers

Satellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers. Dr Ugur GUVEN

Orbit Characteristics

Extending the Patched-Conic Approximation to the Restricted Four-Body Problem

Orbital Mechanics! Space System Design, MAE 342, Princeton University! Robert Stengel

Interplanetary Mission Opportunities

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Rocket Science 102 : Energy Analysis, Available vs Required

ASTRIUM. Interplanetary Path Early Design Tools at ASTRIUM Space Transportation. Nathalie DELATTRE ASTRIUM Space Transportation.

Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications

Flight and Orbital Mechanics

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30.

Ulrich Walter. Astronautics. The Physics of Space Flight. 2nd, Enlarged and Improved Edition

Previous Lecture. Orbital maneuvers: general framework. Single-impulse maneuver: compatibility conditions

ASEN 5050 SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICS Interplanetary

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

MARYLAND. The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I Design Example: UMd Exploration Initiative U N I V E R S I T Y O F.

Parametric Design MARYLAND. The Design Process Level I Design Example: Low-Cost Lunar Exploration U N I V E R S I T Y O F

Optimal Gravity Assisted Orbit Insertion for Europa Orbiter Mission

Patch Conics. Basic Approach

Design of Orbits and Spacecraft Systems Engineering. Scott Schoneman 13 November 03

ENAE 483/788D FINAL EXAMINATION FALL, 2015

10 Orbit and Constellation Design Selecting the Right Orbit

5.12 The Aerodynamic Assist Trajectories of Vehicles Propelled by Solar Radiation Pressure References...

ENAE483: Principles of Space System Design Power Propulsion Thermal System

Celestial Mechanics Lecture 10

SUN INFLUENCE ON TWO-IMPULSIVE EARTH-TO-MOON TRANSFERS. Sandro da Silva Fernandes. Cleverson Maranhão Porto Marinho

Chapter 8. Precise Lunar Gravity Assist Trajectories. to Geo-stationary Orbits

The Astrodynamics and Mechanics of Orbital Spaceflight

Space Travel on a Shoestring: CubeSat Beyond LEO

The Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) Mission Design: A Pegasus Class Mission to a High Energy Orbit

A SIMULATION OF THE MOTION OF AN EARTH BOUND SATELLITE

Interplanetary Spacecraft. Team 12. Alliance: Foxtrot

Seminar 3! Precursors to Space Flight! Orbital Motion!

The B-Plane Interplanetary Mission Design

Lesson 11: Orbital Transfers II. 10/6/2016 Robin Wordsworth ES 160: Space Science and Engineering: Theory and ApplicaCons

ASEN 6008: Interplanetary Mission Design Lab Spring, 2015

Powered Space Flight

BravoSat: Optimizing the Delta-V Capability of a CubeSat Mission. with Novel Plasma Propulsion Technology ISSC 2013

Spacecraft Dynamics and Control

Chapter 13. Gravitation

Astromechanics. 6. Changing Orbits

The Design Process Level I Design Example: Low-Cost Lunar Exploration Amplification on Initial Concept Review

The time period while the spacecraft is in transit to lunar orbit shall be used to verify the functionality of the spacecraft.

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Lecture 15 - Orbit Problems

Parametric Design MARYLAND. The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I Design Example: Project Diana U N I V E R S I T Y O F.

Session 6: Analytical Approximations for Low Thrust Maneuvers

14.1 Earth Satellites. The path of an Earth satellite follows the curvature of the Earth.

GRAVITATION. F = GmM R 2

Flight and Orbital Mechanics. Exams

APPENDIX B SUMMARY OF ORBITAL MECHANICS RELEVANT TO REMOTE SENSING

A Low-Cost Mission for LISA Markus Landgraf, Florian Renk, Pierre Joachim, Rüdiger Jehn HSO-GFA

AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology

Universal Gravitation

Mission Trajectory Design to a Nearby Asteroid

Lecture 22: Gravitational Orbits

Mission to Mars. MAE 598: Design Optimization Final Project. By: Trevor Slawson, Jenna Lynch, Adrian Maranon, and Matt Catlett

Introduction to Astronomy

Concurrent Trajectory and Vehicle Optimization for an Orbit Transfer. Christine Taylor May 5, 2004

Previous Lecture. Approximate solutions for the motion about an oblate planet: The Brouwer model. The Cid- Lahulla model 2 / 39

Celestial Mechanics II. Orbital energy and angular momentum Elliptic, parabolic and hyperbolic orbits Position in the orbit versus time

Rocket Performance MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Ballistic Entry ENAE Launch and Entry Vehicle Design

ESMO Mission Analysis

AA 528 Spacecraft Dynamics and Control. Mehran Mesbahi Aeronautics & Astronautics Winter 2017 University of Washington

Effect of Coordinate Switching on Translunar Trajectory Simulation Accuracy

ASEN 5050 SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICS Prox Ops, Lambert

Launch strategy for Indian lunar mission and precision injection to the Moon using genetic algorithm

ORBITS WRITTEN Q.E. (June 2012) Each of the five problems is valued at 20 points. (Total for exam: 100 points)

Optimal Generalized Hohmann Transfer with Plane Change Using Lagrange Multipliers

AP Physics 1 Chapter 7 Circular Motion and Gravitation

1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded

Distance = Rate x Time Middle grades

Robotic Mobility Atmospheric Flight

Lecture Outline. Chapter 13 Gravity Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 13-1

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Year 12 Physics. 9.2 Space

Formation Flying and Rendezvous and Docking Simulator for Exploration Missions (FAMOS-V2)

where s is the horizontal range, in this case 50 yards. Note that as long as the initial speed of the bullet is great enough to let it hit a target at

NAVIGATION & MISSION DESIGN BRANCH

Gravitational Potential Energy and Total Energy *

Newton s Gravitational Law

Chapter 13. Universal Gravitation

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

Transcription:

Discussion of 483/484 project organization Planetary launch and entry overview Energy and velocity in orbit Elliptical orbit parameters Orbital elements Coplanar orbital transfers Noncoplanar transfers Time in orbit Interplanetary trajectories Relative orbital motion ( proximity operations ) 1 2010 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu

ENAE 483/483 Project Structure Matrix organization everyone has a Project responsibility (NEO mission/exo-spheres) Disciplinary specialty Specialty groups Avionics and Software Crew Systems Loads, Structures, and Mechanisms Power, Propulsion, and Thermal Mission Planning and Analysis Systems Integration 2

Avionics and Software Data management (flight control computers) Sensor networks Communications bus architecture Navigation Guidance Control algorithms Attitude determination and control Software coding and verification Communications 3

Crew Systems Habitat layout Habitability assessments Life support systems design Crew-computer interfaces Crew-robot interfaces Extravehicular activity Crew safety (e.g., fire, radiation) 4

Loads, Structures, and Mechanisms Determination of loads sources Flight Impact (e.g., docking, collision, landing) Ground handling Structural component design Stress analysis Summary loads table (non-negative margins) Design of actuators, latches, moving components Mounting of all systems (e.g., propulsion, avionics) 5

Power, Propulsion, and Thermal Design of propulsion systems Primary (orbital maneuvering) Reaction control system (attitude and fine translation) Power generation Energy storage Power budgets with margin Thermal load tracking Thermal equilibrium calculations 6

Mission Planning and Analysis* Mission science design Science instrument specification Design reference mission creation Selection of candidate targets Orbital mechanics *Much of this will be the responsibility of ASU 7

Systems Integration Team coordination Systems engineering Development and tracking of production schedules Budgeting (e.g., cost, mass) Configuration control Requirements flow-down Work breakdown structure System block diagrams Vehicle configuration Systems integration (overall layout) 8

Space Launch - The Physics Minimum orbital altitude is ~200 km P otential Energy kg in orbit Circular orbital velocity there is 7784 m/sec Kinetic Energy kg in orbit Total energy per kg in orbit = µ r orbit + µ r E = 1.9 10 6 = 1 2 µ r 2 orbit = 30 10 6 J kg J kg T otal Energy kg in orbit = KE + P E = 32 10 6 J kg 9

Theoretical Cost to Orbit Convert to usual energy units T otal Energy kg in orbit = 32 10 6 J kg = 8.888 kw hrs kg Domestic energy costs are ~$0.05/kWhr Theoretical cost to orbit $0.44/kg 10

Actual Cost to Orbit Delta IV Heavy 23,000 kg to LEO $250 M per flight $10,900/kg of payload Factor of 25,000x higher than theoretical energy costs! 11

What About Airplanes? For an aircraft in level flight, Weight Thrust = Lift mg, or Drag T Energy = force x distance, so = L D Total Energy thrust distance = = Td kg mass m = gd L/D For an airliner (L/D=25) to equal orbital energy, d=81,000 km (2 roundtrips NY-Sydney) 12

Equivalent Airline Costs? Average economy ticket NY-Sydney roundround-trip (Travelocity 9/3/09) ~$1300 Average passenger (+ luggage) ~100 kg Two round trips = $26/kg Factor of 60x more than electrical energy costs Factor of 420x less than current launch costs But you get to refuel at each stop! 13

Equivalence to Air Transport 81,000 km ~ twice around the world Voyager - one of only two aircraft to ever circle the world non-stop, non-refueled - once! 14

Orbital Entry - The Physics 32 MJ/kg dissipated by friction with atmosphere over ~8 min = 66kW/kg Pure graphite (carbon) high-temperature material: c p =709 J/kg K Orbital energy would cause temperature gain of 45,000 K! (If you re interesting in how this works out, you can take ENAE 791 Launch and Entry Vehicle Design next term...) 15

Newton s Law of Gravitation Inverse square law F = GMm Since it s easier to remember one number, r 2 µ = GM If you re looking for local gravitational acceleration, g = µ r 2 16

Some Useful Constants Gravitation constant µ = GM Earth: 398,604 km 3 /sec 2 Moon: 4667.9 km 3 /sec 2 Mars: 42,970 km 3 /sec 2 Sun: 1.327x10 11 km 3 /sec 2 Planetary radii r Earth = 6378 km r Moon = 1738 km r Mars = 3393 km 17

Energy in Orbit Kinetic Energy K.E. = 1 2 mv2 = K.E. m Potential Energy P.E. = µm r Total Energy = P.E. m = v2 2 = µ r Constant = v2 2 µ r = µ 2a 2 v 2 = µ r 1 a 18 <--Vis-Viva Equation

Classical Parameters of Elliptical Orbits 19

The Classical Orbital Elements Ref: J. E. Prussing and B. A. Conway, Oxford University Press, 1993 20

Implications of Vis-Viva Circular orbit (r=a) v circular = Parabolic escape orbit (a tends to infinity) v escape = µ r 2µ Relationship between circular and parabolic orbits r v escape = 2v circular 21

The Hohmann Transfer r 2 r 1 v 2 v apogee v 1 v perigee 22

First Maneuver Velocities Initial vehicle velocity Needed final velocity Delta-V v perigee = v 1 = µ v 1 = r 1 µ µ r 1 r 1 2r2 r 1 + r 2 ( ) 2r2 1 r 1 + r 2 23

Second Maneuver Velocities Initial vehicle velocity Needed final velocity Delta-V v apogee = v 2 = µ v 2 = r 2 µ r 2 ( 1 µ r 2 2r1 r 1 + r 2 2r1 r 1 + r 2 ) 24

Limitations on Launch Inclinations Equator 25

Differences in Inclination Line of Nodes 26

Choosing the Wrong Line of Apsides 27

Simple Plane Change v 1 v perigee v apogee Δv 2 v 2 28

Optimal Plane Change v perigee v 1 Δv v apogee 1 Δv 2 v 2 29

First Maneuver with Plane Change Δi 1 Initial vehicle velocity Needed final velocity Delta-V v 1 = v p = v 1 = µ r 1 µ r 1 2r2 r 1 + r 2 v 2 1 + v2 p 2v 1 v p cos i 1 30

Second Maneuver with Plane Change Δi 2 Initial vehicle velocity Needed final velocity Delta-V v 2 = v a = µ r 2 v 2 = µ 2r1 r 1 + r 2 r 2 v 2 2 + v2 a 2v 2 v a cos i 2 31

Sample Plane Change Maneuver Optimum initial plane change = 2.20 32

Bielliptic Transfer Δv 3 Δv 1 Δv 1 Δv 2 Δv 2 33

Coplanar Transfer Velocity Requirements Ref: J. E. Prussing and B. A. Conway, Oxford University Press, 1993 34

Noncoplanar Bielliptic Transfers Δv 3 Δv 1 Δv 1 Δv 2 Δv 2 35

Calculating Time in Orbit 36

Time in Orbit Period of an orbit Mean motion (average angular velocity) Time since pericenter passage M=mean anomaly P = 2π n = µ a 3 a 3 µ M = nt = E e sin E 37

Dealing with the Eccentric Anomaly Relationship to orbit Relationship to true anomaly Calculating M from time interval: iterate until it converges r = a (1 e cos E) tan θ 1 + e 2 = 1 e tan E 2 E i+1 = nt + e sin E i 38

Example: Time in Orbit Hohmann transfer from LEO to GEO h 1 =300 km --> r 1 =6378+300=6678 km r 2 =42240 km Time of transit (1/2 orbital period) a = 1 2 (r 1 + r 2 ) = 24, 459 km t transit = P 2 = π a 3 µ = 19, 034 sec = 5h17m14s 39

Example: Time-based Position Find the spacecraft position 3 hours after perigee µ rad n = = 1.650x10 4 a3 sec e = 1 r p a = 0.7270 E j+1 = nt + e sin E j =1.783 + 0.7270 sin E j E=0; 1.783; 2.494; 2.222; 2.361; 2.294; 2.328; 2.311; 2.320; 2.316; 2.318; 2.317; 2.317; 2.317 40

Example: Time-based Position (cont.) E =2.317 r = a(1 e cos E) = 12, 387 km tan θ 1+e 2 = 1 e tan E = θ = 160 deg 2 Have to be sure to get the position in the proper quadrant - since the time is less than 1/2 the period, the spacecraft has yet to reach apogee --> 0 <θ<180 41

Basic Orbital Parameters Semi-latus rectum (or parameter) Radial distance as function of orbital position Periapse and apoapse distances Angular momentum h = r v p = a(1 e 2 ) r = p 1+e cos θ r p = a(1 e) r a = a(1 + e) h = µp 42

Velocity Components in Orbit v r = dr dt = d dt p r = 1+ecos θ p = 1+ecos θ v r = pe sin θ dθ (1 + e cos θ) 2 dt 1+e cos θ = p r v r = h = r v p( e sin θ dθ dt ) (1 + e cos θ) 2 r2 dθ dt e sin θ p 43

Velocity Components in Orbit (cont.) h = r v h = rv cos γ = r r dθ dt = r 2 dθ dt 44

Patched Conics Simple approximation to multi-body motion (e.g., traveling from Earth orbit through solar orbit into Martian orbit) Treats multibody problem as hand-offs between gravitating bodies --> reduces analysis to sequential two-body problems Caveat Emptor: There are a number of formal methods to perform patched conic analysis. The approach presented here is a very simple, convenient, and not altogether accurate method for performing this calculation. Results will be accurate to a few percent, which is adequate at this level of design analysis. 45

Example: Lunar Orbit Insertion v 2 is velocity of moon around Earth Moon overtakes spacecraft with velocity of (v 2 -v apogee ) This is the velocity of the spacecraft relative to the moon while it is effectively infinitely far away (before lunar gravity accelerates it) = hyperbolic excess velocity 46

Planetary Approach Analysis Spacecraft has v h hyperbolic excess velocity, which fixes total energy of approach orbit v 2 2 µ r = µ 2a = v2 h 2 Vis-viva provides velocity of approach v = v 2 h + 2µ r Choose transfer orbit such that approach is tangent to desired final orbit at periapse v = vh 2 + 2µ µ r r 47

Patched Conic - Lunar Approach Lunar orbital velocity around the Earth Apogee velocity of Earth transfer orbit from initial 400 km low Earth orbit v a = v m v m = Velocity difference between spacecraft infinitely far away and moon (hyperbolic excess velocity) µ r m = 2r1 r 1 + r m =1.018 398, 604 384, 400 =1.018 km sec 6778 6778 + 384, 400 =0.134 km sec v h = v m v a = v m =1.018 0.134 = 0.884 km sec 48

Patched Conic - Lunar Orbit Insertion The spacecraft is now in a hyperbolic orbit of the moon. The velocity it will have at the perilune point tangent to the desired 100 km low lunar orbit is v pm = v 2 h + 2µ m r LLO = The required delta-v to slow down into low lunar orbit is v = v pm v cm =2.451 1.018 2 + 2(4667.9) 1878 4667.9 1878 =2.451 km sec =0.874 km sec 49

ΔV Requirements for Lunar Missions From: To: Low Earth Orbit Lunar Transfer Orbit Low Lunar Orbit Lunar Descent Orbit Lunar Landing Low Earth Orbit 3.107 km/sec Lunar Transfer Orbit 3.107 km/sec 0.837 km/sec 3.140 km/sec Low Lunar Orbit 0.837 km/sec 0.022 km/sec Lunar Descent Orbit 0.022 km/sec 2.684 km/sec Lunar Landing 2.890 km/sec 2.312 km/sec 50

LOI ΔV Based on Landing Site 51

LOI ΔV Including Loiter Effects 52

Interplanetary Pork Chop Plots Summarize a number of critical parameters Date of departure Date of arrival Hyperbolic energy ( C3 ) Transfer geometry Launch vehicle determines available C3 based on window, payload mass 53

Hill s Equations (Proximity Operations) x = 3n 2 x + 2n y + a dx y = 2n x + a dy z = n 2 z + a dz Ref: J. E. Prussing and B. A. Conway, Oxford University Press, 1993 54

Clohessy-Wiltshire ( CW ) Equations x(t) = [ 4 3cos(nt) ]x o + sin(nt) n x o + 2 n y(t) = 6[ sin(nt) nt]x o + y o 2 n [ 1 cos(nt) ] x o + z(t) = z o cos(nt) + z o n sin(nt) z (t) = z nsin(nt) + z sin(nt) o o [ 1 cos(nt) ] y o 4sin(nt) 3nt n y o 55

V-Bar Approach Ref: Collins, Meissinger, and Bell, Small Orbit Transfer Vehicle (OTV) for On-Orbit Satellite Servicing and Resupply, 15th USU Small Satellite Conference, 2001 56

R-Bar Approach Approach from along the radius vector ( Rbar ) Gravity gradients decelerate spacecraft approach velocity - low contamination approach Used for Mir, ISS docking approaches 57 Ref: Collins, Meissinger, and Bell, Small Orbit Transfer Vehicle (OTV) for On-Orbit Satellite Servicing and Resupply, 15th USU Small Satellite Conference, 2001

References for This Lecture Wernher von Braun, The Mars Project University of Illinois Press, 1962 William Tyrrell Thomson, Introduction to Space Dynamics Dover Publications, 1986 Francis J. Hale, Introduction to Space Flight Prentice- Hall, 1994 William E. Wiesel, Spaceflight Dynamics MacGraw- Hill, 1997 J. E. Prussing and B. A. Conway, Oxford University Press, 1993 58