Evaluating the Complexity of the Embryogenic Root System

Similar documents
3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of selective breeding?

ESTIMATION OF GERMINATION POSSIBILITIES OF SOME PEAS STORAGES ACCESSIONS AND THE EVALUATION OF SOME QUALITATIVE INDICATORS ON ALBANIAN PLANT GENE BANK

Abiotic Stress in Crop Plants

Enduring understanding 1.A: Change in the genetic makeup of a population over time is evolution.

Computational Biology Course Descriptions 12-14

Big Idea 1: The process of evolution drives the diversity and unity of life.

AP Curriculum Framework with Learning Objectives

C.v. Dr. Mohammed Ali Hussein

BIOAG'L SCI + PEST MGMT- BSPM (BSPM)

Model plants and their Role in genetic manipulation. Mitesh Shrestha

Principles of QTL Mapping. M.Imtiaz

A A A A B B1

Campbell Biology AP Edition 11 th Edition, 2018


Topic outline: Review: evolution and natural selection. Evolution 1. Geologic processes 2. Climate change 3. Catastrophes. Niche.

AP Biology Essential Knowledge Cards BIG IDEA 1

4/26/18. Domesticated plants vs. their wild relatives. Lettuce leaf size/shape, fewer secondary compounds

Genetic Divergence Studies for the Quantitative Traits of Paddy under Coastal Saline Ecosystem

You are encouraged to answer/comment on other people s questions. Domestication conversion of plants or animals to domestic uses

AP Biology Curriculum Framework

HANDBOOK OF PRECISION AGRICULTURE PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS

Essential knowledge 1.A.2: Natural selection

Interest Grabber. Analyzing Inheritance

7 th Grade Life Science Teaching & Learning Framework

Prediction and Validation of Three Cross Hybrids in Maize (Zea mays L.)

Area of Focus: Biology. Learning Objective 1: Describe the structure and function of organs. Pre-Learning Evaluation: Teaching Methods and Process:

Tigard-Tualatin School District Science Grade Level Priority Standards

1.1. KEY CONCEPT Biologists study life in all its forms. 4 Reinforcement Unit 1 Resource Book. Biology in the 21st Century CHAPTER 1

Introduction to Biology Web Course Informational and Test Schedule

Changes in Plant Metabolism Induced by Climate Change

Chapter 8. Biogeographic Processes. Upon completion of this chapter the student will be able to:

Chapter 5 Evolution of Biodiversity. Sunday, October 1, 17

Introduction to Biology with Lab

Chapter 2 Section 1 discussed the effect of the environment on the phenotype of individuals light, population ratio, type of soil, temperature )

Investigations into biomass yield in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)

Evolution of phenotypic traits

Chapter 2: Extensions to Mendel: Complexities in Relating Genotype to Phenotype.

Picture from "Mendel's experiments: Figure 3," by Robert Bear et al

Prerequisite: CHEM 1311 General Chemistry I (lecture) and CHEM 1111 General Chemistry I Laboratory or CHEM 1411.

Map of AP-Aligned Bio-Rad Kits with Learning Objectives

Symbiotic Fungal Endophytes that Confer Tolerance for Plant Growth in Saline and Dry Soils Zakia Boubakir, Elizabeth Cronin, Susan Kaminskyj

ADVANCED PLACEMENT BIOLOGY

Deterioration of Crop Varieties Causes and Maintenance

BOTANY: COURSE OBJECTIVE AND OUTCOME KHEMUNDI DEGREE COLLEGE, DIGAPAHANDI

Miller & Levine Biology

BIOLOGY STANDARDS BASED RUBRIC

CABRILLO COLLEGE : Fall 2008

HCMS_Science_7th Grade

Horticulture Science

Chapter 15: Darwin and Evolution

Grade Level: AP Biology may be taken in grades 11 or 12.

Observe and explore a given system or concept to deepen scientific understanding. Analyze data to seek out patterns and/or make predictions

PLANT BIOLOGY (PBIO) Plant Biology (PBIO) 1

Grade 7 Science Curriculum Maps

Document category: There is no restriction on the circulation of this document

Page 2. (b) (i) 2.6 to 2.7 = 2 marks; Incorrect answer but evidence of a numerator of OR or denominator of 9014 = 1 mark; 2

Unit of Study: Genetics, Evolution and Classification

Orleans Southwest and Lamoille North Science Curriculum (Grade Cluster 9-12)

Science Textbook and Instructional Materials Correlation to the 2010 Biology Standards of Learning and Curriculum Framework. Publisher Information

Chapter 4: The Organization of Life

Climate Change and Plant Reproduction

Qualities of monogerm male-sterile sugar beet lines

Campbell Biology Concepts & Connections 2015

Science 9 - Unit A Review Sheet

Experimental designs for multiple responses with different models

Goal 1: Develop knowledge and understanding of core content in biology

Chapter 5 Evolution of Biodiversity

NOAA/NSTA Symposium: The Heat is On! Climate Change and Coral Reef Ecosystems Saturday, March 21, 2009

HEREDITY AND VARIATION

1 Soil Factors Affecting Nutrient Bioavailability... 1 N.B. Comerford

7.2: Natural Selection and Artificial Selection pg

Hairy s Inheritance: Investigating Variation, Selection, and Evolution with Wisconsin Fast Plants

RSm ILLINOIS LIBRAE ATU \-CHAMPAIGN

Lecture 8 Insect ecology and balance of life

TEST SUMMARY AND FRAMEWORK TEST SUMMARY

Introduction to population genetics & evolution

Valley Central School District 944 State Route 17K Montgomery, NY Telephone Number: (845) ext Fax Number: (845)

1. The basic structural and physiological unit of all living organisms is the A) aggregate. B) organelle. C) organism. D) membrane. E) cell.

A Decision to Branch Out Evolution and the Domestication of Maize

Ohio Tutorials are designed specifically for the Ohio Learning Standards to prepare students for the Ohio State Tests and end-ofcourse

Chapter 1 Biology: Exploring Life

Chapter 5 Evolution of Biodiversity

SPRING GROVE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT. Course Description. Instructional Strategies, Learning Practices, Activities, and Experiences.

7) NATURAL SELECTION: the process by which forms of life having traits that better fit a specific environmental pressure, such as predators, changes

Textbook Evert RF and SE Eichorn 2012 Raven Biology of Plants. Eighth Edition. WH Freeman. (Table of Contentsi). Lecture Topics

M.S. Requirements Plant Breeding/Molecular Genetics Track Course Title Credits Semester Research Ethics in the Plant and Environmental 0.

Useful Propagation Terms. Propagation The application of specific biological principles and concepts in the multiplication of plants.

Georgia Performance Standards for Urban Watch Restoration Field Trips

Chapter 1. Introduction: Biology Today. Lectures by Chris C. Romero, updated by Edward J. Zalisko

Biology Assessment. Eligible Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills

Biology 1 Spring 2010 Summative Exam

$25 per bin, minimum $50 per on-site visit

Unit 2 Lesson 4 - Heredity. 7 th Grade Cells and Heredity (Mod A) Unit 2 Lesson 4 - Heredity

SELECTING NEW Brachiaria FOR BRAZILIAN PASTURES. 2 CNPq fellow. Abstract

STAAR Biology Assessment

The Science of Life. Introduction to Biology

Section 1: What Is Biodiversity?

Chapter 5. Evolution of Biodiversity

Holt McDougal ScienceFusion Student Edition 2012 Grades 6 8. correlated to the. Minnesota Academic Standards Science Grade 7

Requirements for Prospective Teachers General Science. 4.1a Explain energy flow and nutrient cycling through ecosystems (e.g., food chain, food web)

Transcription:

Inquiry in ACES: An Undergraduate Research Journal Special Edition: Research Apprentice Program 2014 College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Evaluating the Complexity of the Embryogenic Root System Nalysha Torres 1, Tony Grift 2, Martin Bohn 2,3 1 Research Apprentice Program Student Participant 2 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA 3 mbohn@illinois.edu, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA ARTICLE INFO Article history: Received 30 July 2014 Accepted 30 September 2014 Keywords: Maize, Root system; Complexity; Diversity ABSTRACT Roots are of key importance for plant development and productivity. Roots are responsible for the uptake of water and nutrients, as well as stability. Complex root systems are very important for the overall plant development. In this study, we evaluated the complexity of the embryogenic root system, i.e., the root system which develops from the seed during germination, by measuring the primary root length (PRL) and the number of seminal roots (NSR). To determine the complexity of the primary root system seed of a genetically highly diverse set of maize inbred lines (N=50) were germinated for six days. Subsequently, the embryogenic root systems were imaged, the image processed, and analyzed for their PRL and NSR. The maize inbred lines significantly (P<0.05) differed for PRL and NSR revealing a strong genetic basis for both traits. Interestingly, we showed that inbred line geographic origin and breeding program explained a significant part of the diversity for root complexity within the diverse set of maize inbreds. INTRODUCTION Corn is the first most consumed crop in the U.S. and many people and livestock depend on it as their main source of calories. Roots are the base of plants and are strongly related to plant development. Root systems of terrestrial plants serve many important tasks among which anchorage of the plant, and uptake of water plus nutrients are the most important ones (Aiken and Smucker, 1996). The amount of water and mineral nutrients available for the plant depends on how much soil is occupied by its root system. Complex root systems, in terms of architecture, morphology, and structure, are more likely to grow into a healthier plant that will have better yield results. Also, this trait helps the plant to survive under biotic (e.g., pests, microorganisms, or weeds) and abiotic (e.g., pesticide, environment or nutrient problems) conditions. Root complexity is determined by the primary root and a variable amount of seminal roots. Conventional methods cannot provide accurate information about root expansion or complexity. The fractal dimension (FD) has been shown suitable to describe the complexity of natural as well as abstract objects (Mandelbrot, 1983). A fractal is an object that displays self-similarity on all scales. They are created by repeating a simple process over and over in an ongoing feedback loop. Nonetheless, root complexity and development depend on genetic and environmental factors and their interactions (O Toole and Bland, 1987). A limited number of genetic studies is available relating root architecture and development with yield, root lodging, and tolerance to stresses under field conditions (Bohn et al., 2006). To genetically improve root structure in the future, there is a need to identify the genes that govern root complexity (Zhong et al., 2009). Genome-wide association (GWA) mapping is useful in modern genetics to identify genes or narrow regions in the genome that contribute to genetically complex phenotypes. This present lack of knowledge greatly

affects the crop science field. For that reason, the overall goal of this investigation was to provide important insights into the diversity of maize root architectural characteristics at an early developmental stage. The specific objectives of this study were to: 1. Evaluate the complexity of the embryogenic root system of a large and highly diverse set of maize inbred lines (N=50), 2. Determine the association between traditional and innovative root characteristics, 3. Estimate the genetic variability between maize inbred lines for their embryogenic root complexity. Subsequently, this study will be the first step to locate genes involved in the inheritance of maize root architecture and will supply the breeders with the knowledge necessary to design selection strategies for optimizing root system efficiency. We hypothesized that maize inbred lines significantly differ for root architectural traits and that these differences are associated with the inbreds geographic origin and breeding program. LITERATURE REVIEW What you see above ground in your plants is really determined by what happens underground, where the plant roots live. The bigger and healthier the root system, the bigger and healthier the plant. In the present paper, it is intend to explore the diversity of maize root characteristics. In order to do that, different phenotypes of corn roots will be compared. It is hypothesized that since every corn plant is genetically different, so will be their root systems. Hence, plant roots, corn root architectural complexity, and past researches were investigated. The following references were analyzed to govern and sustain this paper with background information. Furthermore, to prove and support the hypothesis. Importance of Roots for Plant Development As stated by Waisel et al. (2002) in Plant Roots; The Hidden Half, root systems of any plant are expected to fulfil two primary functions: the acquisition of soil-based resources (e.g., water and ions), and anchorage. Along with those functions, roots also have other secondary functions such as: storage, production of growth regulators, propagation - process of reproducing or breeding- and dispersal. Complex root systems of modern plants are now seen as achieving the more effective performance of these overall functions. The scarce variation in external features of roots is presumably related to the limited range of variation of the root environment. Unlike other parts of the plant, roots show few distinctive external features that would permit identification. Nevertheless, external features of the roots can be identified by its complexity. Root complexity is defined as the number of root branching points per soil volume. Corn Root Imaging Box This study was possible because of a highthroughput image analysis system composed of integrated hardware and software components to evaluate root complexity. In 2011, professors in the Departments of Agricultural and Biological Engineering and Crop Sciences at the University of Illinois developed the Corn Root Imaging Box (CRIB). This imaging box provides the necessary amount of light to prevent shadows when taking images. According to the researchers, this instrument can take up to 600 images of maize roots per day. The digital cameras of the CRIB are computer controlled. Once the picture is in the computer, the CRIB is able to evaluate root complexity by using MATLAB and other software. MATLAB is a high-level language and interactive environment for numerical computation, visualization, and programming. This program can be used for image and video processing, control systems, test and measurement, computational biology, and others. More than a million engineers and scientists in industry and academia use MATLAB, the language of technical computing. (MATLAB official page). Study Related to the Present Research In 2006, Bohn et al. investigated the inheritance of the primary root system complexity using 231 recombinant inbred lines derived from the IBM (B73 Mo17) population. Digital images were taken after four and eight days of germination and the fractal dimensions were calculated for each root system. Researchers found significant differences in the FD between the different days of imaging. As a result, a certain amount of QTLs were founded on all ten chromosomes explaining a large proportion of the

phenotypic variance. Differing with Bohn et al. (2006), the present research intends to evaluate root complexity variation using the primary root length and number of seminal roots. METHODOLOGY This experiment was conducted following procedures outlined by Bohn et al. (2006). Unlike these researchers, this investigation was run with a predetermined amount of 50 inbred lines (ILs) selected from a diverse set of inbreds (N=300). During the selection process all kinds of genotypes were selected including Tropical inbreds, inbreds from the U.S. Midwest, field corn, sweet corn, and popcorn varieties. These inbreds were developed in breeding programs from South Africa, Thailand, Mexico, and Canada. Experimental Design We applied an incomplete block design to efficiently control for variable growing conditions in the growing chamber (see below). The 50 ILs were subdivided into ten blocks. Each block containing five genetically different ILs. Two replications were used. Sterilization and Germination Procedure The 500 seeds (10 genotype) were divided into two repetitions (REP) using 5 seeds per genotype for each REP. Afterwards, all seeds were surface sterilized in 60 ml of commercial 6% Clorox for 10 minutes. After this treatment, the seeds were washed three times with distilled water (DW) and placed (5 seeds of the same genotype) in the upper third of a nontoxic germination paper. These were placed with the embryo facing down and the space was maximized to prevent contact between different root systems. The germination paper was moisturized with a Captan (BAYER) 2.5 g l -1 solution. Thereafter, the germination paper was rolled up vertically and placed into a 2 l plastic bucket with 1/3 l of Captan solution ( 1500 ml DW + 0.99g Captan ). The idea of conducting this procedure is to minimize infection with fungus. Subsequently, all the buckets were placed into a sterile growth chamber with 0% illumination at 25 o C and 100% relative humidity. The amount of Captan solution was maintained at 250 ml during 6 days until the germination process was over. Data Collection After 6 days of germination the new root systems were evaluated. To make this process more flexible, images of each root system were taken. The images were obtained using the Corn Root Imaging Box (CRIB) (Grift et al., 2011). The color model of the CRIB was changed into a gray scale image to refine the details of the root system. Moreover, the background surface and the light inside the imaging box were taken into consideration to improve the quality of these pictures. Afterwards, a MATLAB software package was used to evaluate the digital images of the maize embryogenic root systems. The pictures of each root system were interpreted. Using a Matlab subroutine the length of each embryogenic root system (PRL) was measured. This data was registered with its corresponding genotype number and seed number for further analysis. Since root complexity is described by the amount of branching points, the number of seminal roots (NSR) is an important trait when evaluating complexity. Therefore, this trait was also evaluated. Statistical Analysis The data for the statistical analysis consisted NRS and PRL measurements obtained from 436 images taken of healthy embryogenic root systems. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted using procedures of the SAS software package. The effect of inbred lines, their geographic origin, and breeding program on root characteristics were tested using appropriate statistical models. The relationship between PRL and NSR was evaluated conducting a correlation analysis. A multivariate analysis was performed to group the used set of maize inbreds into root complexity groups. FINDINGS Maize inbreds significantly differed (P<0.001) for PRL and NSR after six days of germination (Fig. 1, A, D). A combined analysis of NSR and PRL revealed three contrasting root morphology classes (see Table 1 Clusters 1 to 3). Moreover, it was shown that the structure (geographic origin) of the inbred line has no impact on the length of the primary root. In addition, breeding

programs with extreme growing conditions showed relatively shortness in the primary root length. However, in Table 2 is shown that the geographic origin and breeding program of the tested inbred lines significantly (P<0.001) affected expression of NSR (Table 2). It was conclude that the Iowa program displays the smallest NSR as the South Africa program shows the largest number and the inbreds from adapted to tropical growing conditions express a high number of seminal roots of 4.4 and Sweet Corn displays a particularly small number of seminal roots with NSR=1.0. Table 1 Dendrogram of 50 diverse maize inbreds revealed by UPGMA cluster analysis based on embryogenic root characteristics primary root length (PRL) and number of seminal roots (NSR). For each cluster PRL and NSR means are provided. Means with different letters within a column are significantly different at a 0.05 probability level. Figure 1 Distribution (A, D) of maize inbred lines (N=50) for primary root length (PRL) and number of seminal roots (NSR) and scatter plots (B, C) showing the relationship between PRL and NSR. Table 2 Mean of primary root length (PRL) and number of seminal roots (NSR) for various breeding programs and the complete set of 50 maize inbreds. Representative root images are provided to demonstrate root characteristics for each breeding program. Root traits NSR and PRL were not significantly correlated (Fig.1, B, C). However, results suggest a negative relationship between both traits. As observed in our set of maize inbred lines, roots tend to fall into three contrasting root complexity classes: Class 1 Long but not high NSR Class 2 High NSR but not long Class 3 Medium length and medium NSR

The experimental set up was efficient to evaluate differences within a large number of embryogenic root systems (N=50 ILs). In general, fungi infections of plants raised in growth chambers are a common obstacle. However, our protocols for sterilizing the seed, germination paper, and growth chamber shown to have immensely minimized the levels of fungus and other bacteria. At the moment of the analysis, 435 out of 500 images (87%) were registered as useful. This number (N=435) prove that the sterilization process was efficient. The used set of maize inbred lines was highly diverse. It comprised field corn, sweet corn, and popcorn varieties, as well as materials from South Africa, Thailand, Mexico, Canada, and the USA. Given this diversity we were not surprised that root characteristics reflected this diversity. Our analysis showed that geographic origin and the specific breeding program significantly influenced expression of root traits. It is interesting to note that roots from inbreds adapted to the growing conditions in the U.S. Midwest are on average long and show low seminal root numbers, whereas inbreds adapted to more extreme environments, like northern growing regions in the U.S. or tropical environments, display root systems with significantly larger number of seminal roots. Whether this observation is also reflected by the three classes of root shapes ( Root complexity classes ) revealed by a multivariate analysis of PRL and NSR (Table 1) needs to be further investigated. Based on our findings in this study, we can formulate a hypothesis that embryogenic roots of maize cultivars adapted to harsher growing conditions (e.g., cold temperatures or dry conditions during germination) show short primary roots but an increased number of seminal roots. We suggest evaluating the embryogenic root systems of additional maize inbred lines to accommodate the prerequisites of a genome-wide association mapping study with the goal to identify genes involved in the inheritance of root traits. CONCLUSIONS Accordingly to the results interpretation we can conclude that PRL is governed by the genetic composition of the corn plant. Furthermore, it seems that NSR still need deeper investigation. Moreover, we can hypothesize that NSR increase in extremes conditions to explore a larger soil space. Since the plant is growing in stressed conditions it could be possible that this number increases as a response in order to survive this climate. Since PRL and NSR showed a negative correlation, it would be great to explore the relations shown in Table 1 (Cluster 1 to 3) in the further research. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge my mentor Dr. Martin Bohn, as well as, Nicole Yana for their guidance during the past seven weeks. Also, thanks to Dr. Tony Grift for supplying my research with the needed programs and software. Moreover, Ana Martin-Ryals deserve to be congratulated for being with me and my peers through this great experience helping us achieve our goals and complete our requirements. And thanks to the RAP program and all its staff for this research opportunity that will help us exponentially in the future. REFERENCES Aiken, R.M., and A.J.M. Smucker. 1996. Root system regulation of whole plant growth. Annu. Rev. Phytopath. 34:325-347 Bohn, M., J. Novais, R. Fonseca, R. Tuberosa, and T. Grift. 2006. Genetic evaluation of root complexity in maize. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 54:291-303. Grift, T., J. Novais, and M. Bohn. 2011. Highthroughput phenotyping technology for maize roots. Biosystems Engineering 110:40-48. Mandelbrot, B.B. 1983. The fractal geometry of nature. Freeman, San Francisco. MATLAB.. - The Language of Technical Computing. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab. O Toole J.C., and W.L.Bland WL.1987. Genotypic variation in crop plant root systems. Advances in Agronomy 41: 91 145. Waisel, Y., Eshel, A., & Kafkafi, U. (2002). Plant roots the hidden half (3rd ed.). New York: M. Dekker. Zhong, D., J. Novais, T.E. Grift, M. Bohn, and J. Han. 2009. Maize root complexity analysis using a support vector machine method. Comput. Electron. Agric. 69:46-50.

This special edition of iaces is composed of articles written by high school students enrolled in the College of ACES Research Apprentice Program (RAP), University of Illinois. We gratefully acknowledge the many faculty, staff, and graduate student mentors who account for the success of RAP, its Director, Dr. Jesse Thompson, as well as its generous sponsors. Further appreciation extends to Emily Mayhew for her editorial assistance. i-aces Vol. 1 No. 1 (2014)