arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 15 Nov 2004

Similar documents
Orbiting L 2 Observation Point in Space. Herschel-Planck Mission Analysis Martin Hechler ESOC 19/03/2009

A Low-Cost Mission for LISA Markus Landgraf, Florian Renk, Pierre Joachim, Rüdiger Jehn HSO-GFA

IMPACT OF SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS ON THE MISSION DESIGN OF ESA SPACECRAFT

LOW-COST LUNAR COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION

OptElec: an Optimisation Software for Low-Thrust Orbit Transfer Including Satellite and Operation Constraints

The Orbit Control of ERS-1 and ERS-2 for a Very Accurate Tandem Configuration

The Quantum Sensor Challenge Designing a System for a Space Mission. Astrid Heske European Space Agency The Netherlands

MULTI PURPOSE MISSION ANALYSIS DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK MUPUMA

RADIATION OPTIMUM SOLAR-ELECTRIC-PROPULSION TRANSFER FROM GTO TO GEO

Space Travel on a Shoestring: CubeSat Beyond LEO

EUROSTAR 3000 INCLINED ORBIT MISSION : LIFETIME OPTIMISATION IN CASE OF INJECTION WITH A LOW INCLINATION

LISA Pathfinder measuring pico-meters and femto-newtons in space

Solar Orbiter Ballistic Transfer Mission Analysis Synthesis

The Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) Mission Design: A Pegasus Class Mission to a High Energy Orbit

End of Life Re-orbiting The Meteosat-5 Experience

COUPLED OPTIMIZATION OF LAUNCHER AND ALL-ELECTRIC SATELLITE TRAJECTORIES

ESMO Mission Analysis

ASTRIUM. Minimum-time problem resolution under constraints for low-thrust stage trajectory computation. Nathalie DELATTRE ASTRIUM Space Transportation

HYPER Industrial Feasibility Study Final Presentation Orbit Selection

New Worlds Observer Final Report Appendix J. Appendix J: Trajectory Design and Orbit Determination Lead Author: Karen Richon

Figure 1. View of ALSAT-2A spacecraft

Mission Design Options for Solar-C Plan-A

LOTNAV. A Low-Thrust Interplanetary Navigation Tool: The Trajectory Reconstruction Module

LISA Pathfinder / SMART-2

End-Of-Life Disposal Concepts for Lagrange-Point and Highly Elliptical Orbit Missions

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30.

Astrodynamics of Interplanetary Cubesats

LISA Pathfinder Coldgas Thrusters

CAS-ESA Call for small mission proposals - Technical annex

Pioneer anomaly: Implications for LISA?

L eaving Earth and arriving at another planet or asteroid requires

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

INTER-AGENCY SPACE DEBRIS COORDINATION COMMITTEE (IADC) SPACE DEBRIS ISSUES IN THE GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT AND THE GEOSTATIONARY TRANSFER ORBITS

SIMBOL-X: A FORMATION FLYING MISSION ON HEO FOR EXPLORING THE UNIVERSE

Satellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers. Dr Ugur GUVEN

Interplanetary Mission Opportunities

DARE Mission and Spacecraft Overview

BepiColombo Launch Window Design Based on a Phasing Loop Strategy

Observing the gravitational universe from space

Mission analysis forms an integral

LOW EARTH ORBIT CONSTELLATION DESIGN USING THE EARTH-MOON L1 POINT

Orbits for Polar Applications Malcolm Macdonald

LAUNCHES AND LAUNCH VEHICLES. Dr. Marwah Ahmed

ACHIEVING THE ERS-2 ENVISAT INTER-SATELLITE INTERFEROMETRY TANDEM CONSTELLATION.

GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL TECHNIQUES AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL

arxiv:gr-qc/ v2 16 Feb 2006

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Direct MOND/TEVES test with LISA Pathfinder

What is the InterPlanetary Superhighway?

TRAJECTORY SENSITIVITIES FOR SUN-MARS LIBRATION POINT MISSIONS

Massimiliano Vasile, Stefano Campagnola, Paolo Depascale, Stefano Pessina, Francesco Topputo

LISA Pathfinder: experiment details and results

Astrodynamics tools in the ESTEC Concurrent Design Facility. Robin Biesbroek CDF Technical Assistant ESA/ESTEC Noordwijk - NL

Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

Earth-Mars Halo to Halo Low Thrust

Proton Launch System Mission Planner s Guide APPENDIX F. Proton Launch System Options and Enhancements

Usage of IGS TEC Maps to explain RF Link Degradations by Spread-F, observed on Cluster and other ESA Spacecraft

DISPOSAL OF LIBRATION POINT ORBITS ON A HELIOCENTRIC GRAVEYARD ORBIT: THE GAIA MISSION

Precision Attitude and Translation Control Design and Optimization

SP-1291 June Mars Express. The Scientific Investigations

Natural and sail-displaced doubly-symmetric Lagrange point orbits for polar coverage

SELENE TRANSLUNAR TRAJECTORY AND LUNAR ORBIT INJECTION

Exploring the Gravitational Wave Universe Challenges for a LISA Successor

MISSION ENGINEERING SPACECRAFT DESIGN

Design of Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem

A Comparison of Low Cost Transfer Orbits from GEO to LLO for a Lunar CubeSat Mission

ORBIT DETERMINATION OF THE SMART-1 MISSION

1296 EME EME operation can be an adventure, from building the station to operating off the moon.

From the first results of LISAPathfinder to LISA : First step to observing gravitational wave from space

Formation Flying and Rendezvous and Docking Simulator for Exploration Missions (FAMOS-V2)

The Launch of Gorizont 45 on the First Proton K /Breeze M

Prospector-1: A Low-Cost Commercial Asteroid Mission Grant Bonin SmallSat 2016

TRAJECTORY SIMULATIONS FOR THRUST-VECTORED ELECTRIC PROPULSION MISSIONS

INTERNAL THALES ALENIA SPACE

PLANETARY MISSIONS FROM GTO USING EARTH AND MOON GRAVITY ASSISTS*

Preparation of the data analysis of the gravitational wave space antenna.

SENTINEL-1A FLIGHT DYNAMICS LEOP OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE

Thermal experiments in LISA Pathfinder: preparing for operations. Ferran Gibert

Libration Orbit Mission Design: Applications Of Numerical And Dynamical Methods

Lecture D30 - Orbit Transfers

THE METOP-A ORBIT ACQUISITION STRATEGY AND ITS LEOP OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE

Optimal Gravity Assisted Orbit Insertion for Europa Orbiter Mission

Pico-Satellite Orbit Control by Vacuum Arc Thrusters as Enabling Technology for Formations of Small Satellites

Science planning and operations for Mars Express

AIM RS: Radio Science Investigation with AIM

ORBIT DETERMINATION AND CONTROL FOR THE EUROPEAN STUDENT MOON ORBITER

OUT-OF-PLANE MANOEUVRE CAMPAIGNS FOR METOP-A: PLANNING, MODELLING, CALIBRATION AND RECONSTRUCTION. +49(0) ,

Statistical methods to address the compliance of GTO with the French Space Operations Act

ASTEROID IMPACT MISSION: AIM3P MISSION AND PAYLOAD OPERATIONS SCENARIO

RECENT SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE F.ALBY

Control of the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

Solid Propellant Autonomous DE-Orbit System [SPADES]

Propulsion means for CubeSats

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

SPACECRAFT FORMATION CONTROL IN VICINITY OF LIBRATION POINTS USING SOLAR SAILS

Toshinori Kuwahara*, Yoshihiro Tomioka, Yuta Tanabe, Masato Fukuyama, Yuji Sakamoto, Kazuya Yoshida, Tohoku University, Japan

Interplanetary Mission Analysis

Launch strategy for Indian lunar mission and precision injection to the Moon using genetic algorithm

Integral in Orbit* The Integral satellite was launched on 17 October 2002, at

TRANSFER TO THE COLLINEAR LIBRATION POINT L 3 IN THE SUN-EARTH+MOON SYSTEM

Transcription:

Mission design for LISA Pathfinder arxiv:gr-qc/0411071v1 15 Nov 2004 M Landgraf, M Hechler, and S Kemble ESA/ESOC, Robert-Bosch-Straße 5, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany E-mail: Markus.Landgraf@esa.int EADS Astrium, Stevenage, United Kingdom Submitted to: Class. Quantum Grav. 1. Introduction PACS numbers: 95.55.Pe, 07.87.+v, 95.55.Ym, 04.80.Nm Abstract. Here we describe the mission design for SMART-2/LISA Pathfinder. The best trade-off between the requirements of a low-disturbance environment and communications distance is found to be a free-insertion Lissajous orbit around the first co-linear Lagrange point of the Sun-Earth system (L 1 ), 1.5 10 6 km from Earth. In order to transfer SMART-2/LISA Pathfinder from a low Earth orbit, where it will be placed by a small launcher, the spacecraft carries out a number of apogee-raise manoeuvres, which ultimatively place it to a parabolic escape trajectory towards L 1. The challenges of the design of a small mission are met, fulfilling the very demanding technology demonstration requirements without creating excessive requirements on the launch system or the ground segment. ESA has decided to flight-test the technology that its Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) will use to detect gravitational waves (Irion 2002, Danzmann 2003, Hechler and Folkner 2003). The main goal in this test is to find out whether nongravitational disturbances can be removed below the sensitivity limit by careful design and a drag-free and attitude control system (DFACS). The DFACS uses an inertial sensor to detect non-gravitational accelerations acting on the spacecraft hull, and then compensates them using micro-propulsion. The second mission in the frame of the ESA programme for Small Missions for Advanced Research in Technology (SMART- 2) was initiated to perform the required space-borne tests. Here we describe the mission design for SMART-2/LISA Pathfinder. As the interplanetary target orbit for LISA requires substantial on-board communication equipment, which is not suitable for a small mission, alternative options for the operational orbit of SMART-2/LISA Pathfinder are considered. The driving requirement for the selection of the operatinal orbit is to find an environment, which does not exceed the capabilities of the DFACS.

Mission design for LISA Pathfinder 2 L 4 L 2 L 1 L 3 Earth Sun L 5 Figure 1. Curves of zero velocity (ZVC) in the RC3P of Sun, Earth, and spacecraft (not to scale). The near-earth Lagrange points L 1 and L 2 are located at the interstection of the ZVCs on the line connecting Sun and Earth. This poses mainly requirements on the power spectrum of spurious accelerations in the frequency band around 1 mhz, strength of gravity gradients, thermal variations, and electro-static charging currents. In combination these requirements essentially rule out geo-centric orbits. 2. Selection of Operational Orbit The requirements for the operational orbit are: (i) differential gravity < 2.5 10 10 m s 2 (ii) high thermal stability (iii) maximum v capacity: 3, 170 m s 1 (iv) full-year launch window (v) daily visibility from the ESA ground-station in Villafranca 8 hours In order to achieve the required flatness of the gravity field simultaneously with the thermal stability, an orbit far away from the Earth must be found without violating the maximum v capability. Libration orbits around the near-earth Lagrange points of the restricted circular three-body problem (RC3P) are located 1.5 10 6 km from Earth and can be reached without an insertion manoeuvre (Farquhar 1973, Gómez et al 2001).

Mission design for LISA Pathfinder 3 Figure 2. Three-dimensional representation of the type-1 (left) and type-2 (right) trajectories after the escape manoeuvre. The Earth-centred synodic (rotating) x-y-z system is chosen such that the x-y plane is the ecliptic plane and the x-axis points towards the Sun. For LISA Pathfinder the Sun-ward Lagrange point L 1 is selected in order to facilitate spacecraft design with the solar panel on one side and the antenna on the other. The two types of free transfer (no insertion) libration orbits around L 1 are distinguished by the sequence whith which they arrive at the southernmost point, when the daily coverage from a ground-station at northern geo-centric latitudes is worst. For type-1 orbits this is the case 102 days, and for type-2 orbits 205 days after the escape manoeuvre. The relatively large libration orbits shown in figure 2 can be reached without insertion manoeuvre and minimise the variation of the Sun-Earth-spacecraft angle, which allows to install a fixed horn antenna with a 22 beam width (3 db) and thus reasonable gain. The antenna will be installed such that it points with a cant angle of 20 to 30 with respect to the main spacecraft axis, so that the Earth will always be in the field of view of the antenna if the spacecraft is rotated around its main axis (which is aligned with the Sun-Earth line) by 2 per day. The downside of these orbits is the large out-of-plane amplitude, which decreases the daily visibility from a ground-station on the northern hemisphere of the Earth. As the 15 m antenna in Villafranca (40 26 N) will be used as the prime station in the operational phase, type-1 orbits must be selected for launches around the solstices and type-2 orbits for launches around the equinoxes. Even when combining type-1 and type-2 orbits, the launch window does not cover a full year, as illustrated by figure 3.

Mission design for LISA Pathfinder 4 Figure 3. Daily visibility of a spacecraft on type-1 and type-2 libration orbits as shown in figure 2 from the ESA ground stations in Villafranca, Perth, and Kourou as a function of the date of the escape manoeuvre. 3. Launch and Transfer from Low Earth Orbit As LISA Pathfinder will be launched by a small launcher into a low-earth orbit (LEO), the total v to reach the parabolic transfer is substantial (> 3 km s 1 ). With a small chemical propulsion module (thrust 400 N), the escape manoeuvre must be split in order to avoid an excessive burn duration and thus gravity loss. For the initial phase of the transfer the visibility by ground-stations is critical, as shown in figures 5 and 6. Only short passages over the stations occur. The sequence illustrated in figure 4 is optimised so that each burn targets for an apogee pass over a ground station in Villafranca, Kourou, or Perth. During the pass ranging and Doppler measurements are taken by analysing the received signal repeated by the on-board transponder. The accuracy of a single measurement is 3 mm s 1 in Doppler and less than 1 km in ranging. This first pass is to be followed by a second one, where more orbit determination measurements are performed. The second pass is needed in order to achieve the required precision of orbit information before the size of the next manoeuvre is calculated. The total time allocated for the data processing, orbit calculation, planning of the next manoeuvre, and preparation of the commands is 8 hours. After this period, the next pass over one of the ground stations is used to uplink the commands for manoeuvre execution during the next perigee. This sequence

Mission design for LISA Pathfinder 5 Figure 4. Sequence of orbits after release into a 900 200km LEO by the Launcher. The propulsion module raises the apogee in 10 steps to 66, 000km, before the eleventh burn puts the spacecraft on an escape trajectory towards L 1. Figure 5. Ground-track of the first orbit of the LISA Pathfinder mission. The coverage circles show the area where the spacecraft is visible to the ground-station in Kourou (K) and Perth (P). Assuming a launch in northern Russia, the powered phase of the launch (shown in red) ends over China. Then, the spacecraft follows a track that leads it to the injection into the 900 200 km orbit, which is achieved by the launcher upper stage (left). is repeated for all apogee-raise manoeuvres during the early transfer phase.

Mission design for LISA Pathfinder 6 Figure 6. Ground-track of the second and third orbits of the LISA Pathfinder mission. The coverage circles show the area where the spacecraft is visible to the ground-station in Villafranca (V), Kourou (K) and Perth (P). First acquisition of the spacecraft after injection by a ground-station will be in Perth. 4. Summary and Discussion The challenging mission design for LISA Pathfinder is in an advanced state, where optimised reference trajectories are established, and transfer strategies are defined. The environmental requirements set by the technology demonstration payloads can all be met by placing the spacecraft in a large amplitude Lissajous orbit around the first colinear Lagrange point of the Sun-Earth system. There, the solar illumination is constant in magnitude as well as direction, minimising the variability of spurious accelerations and the thermal equilibrium. The transfer sequence puts the spacecraft from an initially low orbit onto the escape parabola, which leads to a free transfer towards the large amplitude Lissajous orbit, without violating visibility constraints from the ESA ground-stations. In theory, the propellant allocation for the transfer could be reduced by using a lunar swing-by technique. The saving in v is however only 50 m s 1, which is negligible compared to the total v budget and thus does not justify the increase in operational risk and complexity. The current mission design presented above demonstrates how low-cost missions can be implemented using advanced astrodynamic methods in ordert to fulfill demanding science requirements under strong constraints in the total payload mass and launcher performance. With the LISA Pathfinder mission implemented in this way, the first step towards detecting gravitational waves in the mhz regime will be taken.

Mission design for LISA Pathfinder 7 References Danzmann K 2003 Adv. Space Res. 32 1233 Farquhar R W 1973 Celest. Mech. 7 458 Gómez, Jorba À, Masdemont J, and Simó C 2001 Dynamics and Mission Design Near Libration Points Hechler F and Folkner W M 2003 Adv. Space Res. 32 1277 Irion R 2002 Science 297 1113