Case Study 2: 2014 Iquique Sequence

Similar documents
Case Study 1: 2014 Chiang Rai Sequence

Introduction to Displacement Modeling

Resolving Stress Components and Earthquake Triggering

Tsunami and earthquake in Chile Part 2

Magnitude 7.1 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN

Preliminary slip model of M9 Tohoku earthquake from strongmotion stations in Japan - an extreme application of ISOLA code.

Once you have opened the website with the link provided choose a force: Earthquakes

Magnitude 8.2 NORTHWEST OF IQUIQUE, CHILE

Synthetic Near-Field Rock Motions in the New Madrid Seismic Zone

Crustal deformation by the Southeast-off Kii Peninsula Earthquake

Lab 9: Satellite Geodesy (35 points)

AVERAGE AND VARIATION OF FOCAL MECHANISM AROUND TOHOKU SUBDUCTION ZONE

Seismic Source Mechanism

Data Repository of Paper: The role of subducted sediments in plate interface dynamics as constrained by Andean forearc (paleo)topography

RELOCATION OF THE MACHAZE AND LACERDA EARTHQUAKES IN MOZAMBIQUE AND THE RUPTURE PROCESS OF THE 2006 Mw7.0 MACHAZE EARTHQUAKE

Advantages of Regional and Global Data Exchange. Gavin Hayes U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center

Tsunami waves swept away houses and cars in northern Japan and pushed ships aground.

Magnitude 7.6 SOUTH OF IQUIQUE, CHILE

Rupture Characteristics of Major and Great (M w 7.0) Megathrust Earthquakes from : 1. Source Parameter Scaling Relationships

Magnitude 7.6 & 7.4 SOLOMON ISLANDS

Centroid moment-tensor analysis of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. and its larger foreshocks and aftershocks

Magnitude 7.0 PERU. This region of the Andes is a sparsely populated area, there were no immediate reports of injuries or damage.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

OCEAN/ESS 410. Lab 12. Earthquake Focal Mechanisms. You can write your answers to all be (e) on this paper.

Magnitude 7.0 NEW CALEDONIA

Case Study of Japan: Crustal deformation monitoring with GNSS and InSAR

Rapid source characterization of the 2011 M w 9.0 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The March 11, 2011, Tohoku-oki earthquake (Japan): surface displacement and source modelling

Vertical to Horizontal (V/H) Ratios for Large Megathrust Subduction Zone Earthquakes

Simulation of Strong Ground Motions for a Shallow Crustal Earthquake in Japan Based on the Pseudo Point-Source Model

TSUNAMI PROPAGATION AND INUNDATION MODELINGS ALONG SOUTH-EAST COAST OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA

Centroid-moment-tensor analysis of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake and its larger foreshocks and aftershocks

Magnitude 7.6 & 7.6 PERU

Rupture process of the 2010 M w 7.8 Mentawai tsunami earthquake from joint inversion of near-field hr-gps and

The Mw 6.2 Leonidio, southern Greece earthquake of January 6, 2008: Preliminary identification of the fault plane.

SOURCE INVERSION AND INUNDATION MODELING TECHNOLOGIES FOR TSUNAMI HAZARD ASSESSMENT, CASE STUDY: 2001 PERU TSUNAMI

Tsunami Simulation of 2009 Dusky Sound Earthquake in New Zealand

Internal Layers of the Earth

Seismogeodesy for rapid earthquake and tsunami characterization

The IISEE earthquake catalog, Catalog of Damaging Earthquakes in the World, IISEE-NET,, and BRI strong motion observation

Magnitude 7.1 SOUTH SANDWICH ISLANDS

Tsunami Simulations after the Mw7.5 78km N of Palu, Indonesia September 28, 2018

NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS FOR TSUNAMI FORECASTING AT PADANG CITY USING OFFSHORE TSUNAMI SENSORS

FULL MOMENT TENSOR ANALYSIS USING FIRST MOTION DATA AT THE GEYSERS GEOTHERMAL FIELD

Lesvos June 12, 2017, Mw 6.3 event, a quick study of the source

Triggering of earthquakes during the 2000 Papua New Guinea earthquake sequence

Supplementary Materials for

AN OVERVIEW AND GUIDELINES FOR PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MAPPING

EARTHQUAKE LOCATIONS INDICATE PLATE BOUNDARIES EARTHQUAKE MECHANISMS SHOW MOTION

COULOMB STRESS CHANGES DUE TO RECENT ACEH EARTHQUAKES

SOURCE MODELING OF RECENT LARGE INLAND CRUSTAL EARTHQUAKES IN JAPAN AND SOURCE CHARACTERIZATION FOR STRONG MOTION PREDICTION

DETERMINATION OF SLIP DISTRIBUTION OF THE 28 MARCH 2005 NIAS EARTHQUAKE USING JOINT INVERSION OF TSUNAMI WAVEFORM AND GPS DATA

Chapter 2. Earthquake and Damage

SOURCE PROCESS OF THE 2003 PUERTO PLATA EARTHQUAKE USING TELESEISMIC DATA AND STRONG GROUND MOTION SIMULATION

TSUNAMI HAZARD ASSESSMENT FOR THE CENTRAL COAST OF PERU USING NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS FOR THE 1974, 1966 AND 1746 EARTHQUAKES

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

crustal structure experiment beneath Wairarapa - Wellington area: results from SAHKE

Magnitude 6.3 SOUTH ISLAND OF NEW ZEALAND

Sendai Earthquake NE Japan March 11, Some explanatory slides Bob Stern, Dave Scholl, others updated March

Hazard and Vulnerability of Moderate Seismicity Regions

Supplementary Material

Technical Report December 25, 2016, Mw=7.6, Chiloé Earthquake

Data Repository Item For: Kinematics and geometry of active detachment faulting beneath the TAG hydrothermal field on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge

Modeling of the 2011 Tohoku-oki. oki Tsunami and it s s impacts to Hawaii

Magnitude 7.9 SE of KODIAK, ALASKA

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF TSUNAMI PROPAGATION AND INUNDATION ALONG THE RAKHINE COAST AREAS IN MYANMAR

GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 3: Finding location and velocity data for PBO GPS stations

Geometry of co-seismic surface ruptures and tectonic meaning of the 23 October 2011 Mw 7.1 Van earthquake (East Anatolian Region, Turkey)

Seismic Activity and Crustal Deformation after the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake

Earthquake. What is it? Can we predict it?

Source of the July 2006 West Java tsunami estimated from tide gauge records

Magnitude 7.0 PAPUA, INDONESIA

Magnitude 7.0 VANUATU

EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PARAMETERS FOR SUBDUCTION ZONE EVENTS CAUSING TSUNAMIS IN AND AROUND THE PHILIPPINES

Summary so far. Geological structures Earthquakes and their mechanisms Continuous versus block-like behavior Link with dynamics?

GPS study of N-S trending Karaburun Belt (Turkey) and its E-W trending eastern part

Lecture 20: Slow Slip Events and Stress Transfer. GEOS 655 Tectonic Geodesy Jeff Freymueller

Empirical Green s Function Analysis of the Wells, Nevada, Earthquake Source

The 2011 Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami Sequence. Mitchell May, EPSC 330

Magnitude 7.7 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION

Tohoku-oki event: Tectonic setting

1.3 Short Review: Preliminary results and observations of the December 2004 Great Sumatra Earthquake Kenji Hirata

GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 5: 2014 South Napa earthquake GPS strain analysis student exercise

Inquiry: Sumatran earthquakes with GPS Earth Science Education

Unit 9 (packet #2): Volcanoes and Earthquakes

Special feature: Are its lessons being adequately applied? Follow-up on the ten-year anniversary of the Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake

Received 15 January 2010, Revised 23 August 2010, Accepted 17 September 2010

Magnitude 7.3 OFFSHORE EL SALVADOR

Materials and Methods The deformation within the process zone of a propagating fault can be modeled using an elastic approximation.

The April 1, 2014 Iquique, Chile M w 8.1 earthquake rupture sequence

The Earthquake of Padang, Sumatra of 30 September 2009 scientific information and update

Upper plate reverse fault reactivation and the unclamping of the megathrust during the 2014 Northern Chile earthquake sequence

TSUNAMI CHARACTERISTICS OF OUTER-RISE EARTHQUAKES ALONG THE PACIFIC COAST OF NICARAGUA - A CASE STUDY FOR THE 2016 NICARAGUA EVENT-

Magnitude 7.8 SCOTIA SEA

An analysis of the Kefalonia seismic sequence of Jan Feb. 3, 2014

How GNSS CORS in Japan works for geodetic control and disaster mitigations

Seismic slip on an upper-plate normal fault during a large subduction megathrust rupture

LECTURE 3 EARTHQUAKES: DETECTION, LOCATION & FOCAL GEOMETRY

Case study of Japan: Reference Frames in Practice

Transcription:

Case Study 2: 2014 Iquique Sequence

Overview Mw 8.2 earthquake on 1 April 2014 at 11:08:43 UTC Pictures of damage Seismicity maps Foreshock seismicity -> Main shock -> Aftershock 1 April 2014 11:08:43 UTC, Mw 8.2 earthquake

Santiago, Chile

Iquique, Chile

Port of Iquique, Chile

16 March

16 March 17 March

16 March 17 March 22 March

16 March 17 March 22 March 23 March

16 March 17 March 22 March 23 March Prior to main shock

16 March 17 March 22 March 23 March Prior to main shock 1 April

16 March 17 March 22 March 23 March Prior to main shock 1 April 10 April

Foreshock Displacements Exercise: using the foreshocks Mw 6.0 and larger, predict the evolution of displacements at GPS stations along the Chile coast. Compare the total predicted horizontal displacements from all these foreshocks with the observed GPS displacements immediately prior to the 1 April Mw 8.2 main shock.

Foreshock Displacements Search the Global Centroid Moment Tensor catalog for the earthquake parameters you need www.globalcmt.org

Starting Date: 16 March 2014

Number of days from start: 16

Magnitude 6.0 and greater

Latitude: -21.0º to -19.5º Longitude: -71.5º to -70.0º

Foreshock Displacements Reminder from Chiang Rai, Thailand, case study: we usually know the magnitude of the earthquake, and have to estimate the dimensions and slip of the earthquake for use with O92UTIL Typically, both slip and fault area increase systematically with magnitude

Foreshock Displacements Wells and Coppersmith (1994)

Foreshock Displacements Wells and Coppersmith (1994)

Foreshock Displacements O92UTIL implements several empirical relations, allowing the user to put magnitude in the input fault file instead of fault slip and dimensions

Foreshock Displacements Input fault file (fault.dat) -70.92-19.94 12 284 26 54 6.7 Lon Lat Dep Strike Dip Rake Mag Same as previous input format

Foreshock Displacements Input fault file (fault.dat) -70.92-19.94 12 284 26 54 6.7 Lon Lat Dep Strike Dip Rake Mag

Foreshock Displacements o92util -mag fault.dat -sta station.dat... (instead of o92util -flt fault.dat...)

Foreshock Displacements GPS stations on west coast of Chile What are the predicted horizontal displacements at these 5 stations?

Foreshock Displacements GPS stations on west coast of Chile What are the predicted horizontal displacements at these 5 stations?

Foreshock Displacements GPS stations on west coast of Chile What are the predicted horizontal displacements at these 5 stations? Station East (mm) North (mm) AEDA -4.0 2.9 ATJN -10.0-7.2 CRSC -2.4 2.3 IQQE -7.9 1.1 PSGA -14.5-3.5 Observed displacements

Foreshock Displacements GPS stations on west coast of Chile Station East (mm) North (mm) AEDA -4.0 2.9 ATJN -10.0-7.2 CRSC -2.4 2.3 IQQE -7.9 1.1 PSGA -14.5-3.5

Foreshock Displacements faults.dat: -70.92-19.94 12 284 26 54 6.7-71.05-20.01 18 352 17 94 6.4-71.14-19.73 19 346 20 90 6.2-71.05-19.70 22 350 21 100 6.2

Foreshock Displacements GPSloc.dat: AEDA -70.178-20.546-4 2.9 ATJN -70.137-19.301-10 -7.2 CRSC -70.080-20.918-2.4 2.3 IQQE -70.132-20.274-7.9 1.1 PSGA -70.123-19.597-14.5-3.5

Foreshock Triggering Exercise: model the stress change evolution on the subduction zone plate boundary resulting from the largest foreshocks. Were these events triggered? How do these earthquakes change the state of stress at the Mw 8.2 hypocenter?

Foreshock Triggering We have earthquake parameters from the previous exercise To resolve stresses, we need the location of the plate boundary at depth and the kinematics (orientation and slip direction) of the plate interface

Foreshock Triggering Use GRID to generate the locations for computing CS on the plate boundary Recall: GRID can create a horizontal or a dipping plane; which is more appropriate for a subduction zone plate boundary? What is a good reference point for the grid?

Foreshock Triggering One option is to use a plate interface model to determine a reference point on the plane of interest For example, USGS Slab 1.0 earthquake.usgs.gov/data/slab/

Try the interactive map

Option below map to search for plate boundary parameters at coordinates of interest.

The reference point might be the earthquake hypocenter, centroid, etc.

Foreshock Triggering Using the Mw 8.2 centroid as the reference coordinate (-70.5ºE, -19.8ºN), Slab 1.0 gives a depth for the plate boundary at this point of 36 km Also yields strike and dip; are these values consistent with the foreshock kinematics?

Foreshock Triggering

Foreshock Triggering

Foreshock Triggering

Foreshock Triggering

Main Shock Triggering Exercise: model the stress change on the plate interface resulting from the 1 April main shock. How does this compare to the location of the 3 April Mw 7.7 aftershock? You can find the FFM on the USGS website.

Main Shock Triggering

Main Shock Triggering o92util -ffm iquique_2014.ffm...

Main Shock Triggering Noisy colors! Two reasons: Slip in every subfault Using one plane instead of plate boundary with changing dip

Main Shock Triggering Exercise: What does the stress change from the 1 April main shock look like in cross-section?

Main Shock Triggering