Linear Algebra Fall mathx.kaist.ac.kr/~schoi/teaching.html.

Similar documents
1. Introduction to commutative rings and fields

Direct Proof and Counterexample I:Introduction

Direct Proof and Counterexample I:Introduction. Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Section 3.1: Direct Proof and Counterexample 1

1. Introduction to commutative rings and fields

Lecture 2: What is Proof?

Gödel s Incompleteness Theorems

The Process of Mathematical Proof

Elementary Matrices. MATH 322, Linear Algebra I. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

Last Time. x + 3y = 6 x + 2y = 1. x + 3y = 6 y = 1. 2x + 4y = 8 x 2y = 1. x + 3y = 6 2x y = 7. Lecture 2

A Simple Proof That Finite Mathematics Is More Fundamental Than Classical One. Felix M. Lev

Class 29 - November 3 Semantics for Predicate Logic

Linear equations The first case of a linear equation you learn is in one variable, for instance:

We have seen that the symbols,,, and can guide the logical

CITS2211 Discrete Structures Proofs

CHAPTER 11. Introduction to Intuitionistic Logic

Math 309 Notes and Homework for Days 4-6

Jennifer Duong Daniel Szara October 9, 2009

What is proof? Lesson 1

Contact. Emina. Office: East Hall 1825 Phone:

A Simple Proof That Finite Mathematics Is More Fundamental Than Classical One. Felix M. Lev

Linear Algebra. Min Yan

Vocabulary atom atomos Dalton's atomic theory law of constant composition law of definite proportions law of multiple proportions matter.

3 Fields, Elementary Matrices and Calculating Inverses

Industrial revolution and reform of mathematics

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2016 Seshia and Walrand Note 2

1.3 Linear Dependence & span K

Grade 7/8 Math Circles Winter March 20/21/22 Types of Numbers

Proofs: A General How To II. Rules of Inference. Rules of Inference Modus Ponens. Rules of Inference Addition. Rules of Inference Conjunction

Part 1: You are given the following system of two equations: x + 2y = 16 3x 4y = 2

Greece In 700 BC, Greece consisted of a collection of independent city-states covering a large area including modern day Greece, Turkey, and a multitu

CHAPTER 0: BACKGROUND (SPRING 2009 DRAFT)

Logic and Proof. Aiichiro Nakano

INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC

Jane and Joe are measuring the circumference of a dime with a string. Jane' s result is: 55 mm Joe's result is: 58 mm

[Ch 3, 4] Logic and Proofs (2) 1. Valid and Invalid Arguments ( 2.3, 3.4) 400 lecture note #2. 1) Basics

Linear Algebra. Preliminary Lecture Notes

Axiomatic set theory. Chapter Why axiomatic set theory?

Affine Planes: An Introduction to Axiomatic Geometry

7.6 The Inverse of a Square Matrix

Grade 8 Chapter 7: Rational and Irrational Numbers

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2018 Alistair Sinclair and Yun Song Note 2

Final Exam Extra Credit Opportunity

Russell s logicism. Jeff Speaks. September 26, 2007

Linear Algebra. Preliminary Lecture Notes

COMP 182 Algorithmic Thinking. Proofs. Luay Nakhleh Computer Science Rice University

Chapter 3. The Logic of Quantified Statements

Math 144 Summer 2012 (UCR) Pro-Notes June 24, / 15

Introduction to Logic

chapter 12 MORE MATRIX ALGEBRA 12.1 Systems of Linear Equations GOALS

35 Chapter CHAPTER 4: Mathematical Proof

Linear Algebra Done Wrong. Sergei Treil. Department of Mathematics, Brown University

Manual of Logical Style

Numbers, proof and all that jazz.

Boolean Algebra and Proof. Notes. Proving Propositions. Propositional Equivalences. Notes. Notes. Notes. Notes. March 5, 2012

Systems of Linear Equations and Inequalities

Chapter 1: The Logic of Compound Statements. January 7, 2008

3. The Logic of Quantified Statements Summary. Aaron Tan August 2017

Workshop 1- Building on the Axioms. The First Proofs

Readings: Conjecture. Theorem. Rosen Section 1.5

means is a subset of. So we say A B for sets A and B if x A we have x B holds. BY CONTRAST, a S means that a is a member of S.

2. Introduction to commutative rings (continued)

Just-in-Time-Teaching and other gadgets. Richard Cramer-Benjamin Niagara University

CMA Geometry Unit 1 Introduction Week 2 Notes

Linear Algebra I. Ronald van Luijk, 2015

Vector Spaces. 9.1 Opening Remarks. Week Solvable or not solvable, that s the question. View at edx. Consider the picture

CM10196 Topic 2: Sets, Predicates, Boolean algebras

Lecture 1: Axioms and Models

Determinant: 3.3 Properties of Determinants

Math 308 Midterm Answers and Comments July 18, Part A. Short answer questions

MthEd/Math 300 Williams Fall 2011 Midterm Exam 2

Columbus State Community College Mathematics Department Public Syllabus

2 Lecture 2: Logical statements and proof by contradiction Lecture 10: More on Permutations, Group Homomorphisms 31

MAGIC Set theory. lecture 1

Logic, Sets, and Proofs

Notes on arithmetic. 1. Representation in base B

The following techniques for methods of proofs are discussed in our text: - Vacuous proof - Trivial proof

Geometry and Philosophy

Lecture 14 Rosser s Theorem, the length of proofs, Robinson s Arithmetic, and Church s theorem. Michael Beeson

Euclid Geometry And Non-Euclid Geometry. Have you ever asked yourself why is it that if you walk to a specific place from

0.2 Vector spaces. J.A.Beachy 1

Linear Algebra II. 2 Matrices. Notes 2 21st October Matrix algebra

Mathematical Logic Prof. Arindama Singh Department of Mathematics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Lecture - 15 Propositional Calculus (PC)

Curves in the configuration space Q or in the velocity phase space Ω satisfying the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equations,

P1-763.PDF Why Proofs?

Section 1.3: Valid and Invalid Arguments

Practice Midterm Exam Solutions

Math Number 842 Professor R. Roybal MATH History of Mathematics 24th October, Project 1 - Proofs

CS3110 Fall 2013 Lecture 11: The Computable Real Numbers, R (10/3)

CHAPTER 1. Introduction

Inference and Proofs (1.6 & 1.7)

Lecture 1 Systems of Linear Equations and Matrices

Lecture 2: Proof Techniques Lecturer: Lale Özkahya

Modern Algebra Prof. Manindra Agrawal Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Propositional Logic. Fall () Propositional Logic Fall / 30

Unit 3: Definitions, Theorems and Proofs

Proof Terminology. Technique #1: Direct Proof. Learning objectives. Proof Techniques (Rosen, Sections ) Direct Proof:

THE LOGIC OF QUANTIFIED STATEMENTS. Predicates and Quantified Statements I. Predicates and Quantified Statements I CHAPTER 3 SECTION 3.

Argument. whenever all the assumptions are true, then the conclusion is true. If today is Wednesday, then yesterday is Tuesday. Today is Wednesday.

Comprehensive Introduction to Linear Algebra

Transcription:

Linear Algebra Fall 2013 mathx.kaist.ac.kr/~schoi/teaching.html.

Course HPs klms.kaist.ac.kr: some announcements, can ask questions here, also link to my page. Also, grades for quizzes and exames. math.kaist.ac.kr/~schoi: homework, schedules, sample exams, class assistants, how to survive

Purpose of mathematics Mathematics originates with Pythagoras. Babylonians and Egyptians had many computations but no proofs. Proofs are ways to justify your reasoning systematically so that the truth is democratically verified. That is most people agree with the statements. (Science starts with Ionians in the same way. )

We now grow out of high school mathematics Mathematics are taught as means to compute numbers. This is useful and very relevant to society and is what politicians and company presidents want. What is wrong with this? The real purpose of mathematics is to verify results and organize them into an understandable system of theorems and proofs. In this course, we begin. This is an opportunity for you to be more than just an engineer computing out numbers without understanding. A system of knowledge will aid you in finding right computations to do and verify your results often.

What is a proof? Proofs can be given only in a system with given axioms and logical operations as in Euclidean geometry. In the system, we have a way of organizing ideas so that experts agree and are not confused about the validity Rigorous proof is a certification of validity which we can rely on. Experimental scientists claim to use experiments to verify their results but science always involves models and assumptions which are not verifiable by experiments only.

Rigorous proof mathematics is very different In other fields, such as engineering, biology, statistics, chemisty, physics, a lot of reasoning that occur are often not acceptable to mathematics in pure point of view. What Science does is to set up some loose system which can be verified or falsified. This uses a lot of tradition and logic and imaginations. Often precise logical steps are missing. In pure mathematical proofs, we strive to eliminate any gaps in logic however plausible the reasoning might be. In applying mathematics to other fields, one needs to be careful about this distinction. Often, this is not followed completely. The other fields rely on authority more.

Learning rigorous mathematics The type of theorem and proof presentation of mathematics are formal and maybe is not the best way to learn. Communications with other people help. Abstract notions can be understood by specifying. That is find examples. Proofs can be more easily understood by using specific examples. Doing exercises.

Greek mathematics Pythagoras: first introduced formal methods of proofs. Proved Pythagoras theorem. Existence of Icohahedrons. Tried to show that universe is made of numbers. Plato: Tried to develop geometry to understand everything http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/image:sanzio_01.jpg Euclide: A system of geometry Archimedes: integration, series, mechanics, physics Greek mathematics became a lost subject in the dark ages. Maybe people lost interest in thinking

Beginning of abstract mathematics In 17th century, Newton discovered calculus and invented Newtonian mechanics. There were many applications. A golden age of mathematics in Europe 17-20th century follows. By 19th century, so much mathematics were developed and confusions began to arise. Existence questions were unanswerable in many cases.

Sets and logic Frege started logic and set theory. Everything should be put in logical fom. Russell, Whitehead tried to give foundations of mathematics using logic and set theory. Hilbert thought that this was possible. Godel found some problems with it. Brouwer began intuitionism. However, today most mathematicians are not following intuitionism.

What is an abstract mathematics? We pretend that only sets exists and logic is the only means to study sets. From set theory, we build objects such as numbers, vectors, functions so on and introduce definitions about them and study their relationships to one another. We prove theorems, lemmas, corollaries using logic and definitions. These mathematical objects and results are applied in many general situations by making concrete things abstract and conversely.

Why use abstract notions? An abstract notion stands for many things at the same time. (Like Object oriented programming in computer science) Sometimes abstract objects can be viewed as an another type of abstract objects. This gives us much freedom. Many problems can be viewed completely elementary if interpreted differently in abstract manner. If abstract ideas do work, it brings significant improvements.

Logic: the ethods of proofs (more at logics notes at the course HP) To prove P è Q: Assume P is true and then prove Q. Given Goal -, -, P è Q Given Goal -,-, P Q (Direct proof)

Convert to ~Q è ~P: Assume Q is false and prove P is false. Given Goal -,- P è Q Given Goal -,-, ~Q ~P Example: Given: Goal Given: Goal:

To prove ~P: 1. Re-express in positive form. 2. Assume P and reach a contradiction. Given: -,- Goal: ~P Given:-,-. P Goal: contradiction To use Pè Q: modus ponens: P, Pè Q : Q modus tollens: Pè Q, ~Q; ~P To prove a goal of form P^Q: Prove P and Q separately. To use P^Q: Given as separate P and Q. To prove : Prove Pè Q and Qè P. To use : Given as separate Pè Q and Qè P

To use a given of form : Divide into cases: 1. Assume P and case 2. Assume Q. Given Goal: --- Case 1: Given P, Goal: -- Case 2: Given Q, Goal:--- To prove a goal of form (1) Either prove P or prove Q (2) Assume P is false and show Q is true

Example: Given: Given: (divide by x here.) Goal: Goal: To prove a goal of form Given -,- Goal Given -,-, x arbitrary Goal P(x) To prove a goal of from Given -,- Goal Given -,-, x guessed Goal P(x)

Example: Given x>0, Guess work Goal: Given Goal y(y+1)=x To use a given of form x o introduced new variable P(x o ) existential instantiation To use a given of form We can plug in any value a for x.

Course outline Abstract vector spaces and linear transformations Review matrices: solving equations by row operations. Reduced forms. Vector spaces: abstract device Linear transformations Classifications of linear transformations: invariants. Polynomials: Ideals, generators Determinants: invariant of linear maps Elementary canonical forms Rational form, Jordan forms Inner product spaces

Purpose of the course How to prove things: introductions to pure mathematics (and applied). Understand abstract notions. Using and finding examples Understand vector spaces, linear transformations Classify linear transformations independent of coordinate expressions.

Purpose of linear algebra People can add, subtract, multiply. Nonliear mathematics are hard Linearizations are good approximations (1st step) Linearizations are good design principles. Mathematical analysis, Quantum physics are linear (but infinite dimensional). Most of mathematics consist of linear objects or linear maps.

Linear algebra and higher level courses In algebra, field theory, rings, modules are generalizations of vector spaces or uses linear algebra. Number theory also uses linear alg. Linear maps are generalized to Lie groups, useful in many areas. Infinite dimensional generalization gives us mathematical analysis and quantum theory Geometries are analysized locally by linear algebra

Chapter 1. Linear equations Fields System of linear equations: Row equivalences, Row reduced echelon form, elementary marices Invertible matrice