INTEGER QUANTUM HALL EFFECT

Similar documents
A mathematical model for Mott s Variable Range Hopping

COMPUTATIONAL. NONCOMMUTATIVE GEOMETRY The work of E. Prodan. Sponsoring. Jean BELLISSARD

QUANTUM TRANSPORT. KUBO S FORMULA for. Jean BELLISSARD 1 2. Collaborations:

The universality of this eect had then an explanation. Moreover, as proposed by Prange [20, 16], Thouless [22] and Halperin [15], the Hall conductance

DISSIPATIVE TRANSPORT APERIODIC SOLIDS KUBO S FORMULA. and. Jean BELLISSARD 1 2. Collaborations:

GAP LABELING THEOREMS

arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 31 Jan 2016

TILINGS APERIODIC MEDIA

Hopping transport in disordered solids

The Quantum Hall Conductance: A rigorous proof of quantization

WANNIER TRANSFORM APERIODIC SOLIDS. for. Jean BELLISSARD. Collaboration:

Inequivalent bundle representations for the Noncommutative Torus

ON THE CHERN CHARACTER OF A THETA-SUMMABLE FREDHOLM MODULE.

VARIOUS MATHEMATICAL ASPECTS TILING SPACES. Jean BELLISSARD 1 2. Collaborations: Georgia Institute of Technology & Institut Universitaire de France

Magnetic symmetries:

Disordered topological insulators with time-reversal symmetry: Z 2 invariants

DISSIPATIVE DYNAMICS IN SEMICONDUCTORS AT LOW TEMPERATURE

Les états de bord d un. isolant de Hall atomique

HIGHER INVARIANTS: TOPOLOGICAL INSULATORS

THE NONCOMMUTATIVE TORUS

COHOMOLOGY. Sponsoring. Jean BELLISSARD

Topological nature of the Fu-Kane-Mele invariants. Giuseppe De Nittis

Distribution of Chern number by Landau level broadening in Hofstadter butterfly

Di usion hypothesis and the Green-Kubo-Streda formula

RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY COMPACT METRIC SPACES. Jean BELLISSARD 1. Collaboration:

Physics of Semiconductors

arxiv: v2 [math-ph] 13 Jun 2014

Theory of Aperiodic Solids:

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.other] 20 Apr 2010

The semiclassical. model for adiabatic slow-fast systems and the Hofstadter butterfly

LAPLACIANS COMPACT METRIC SPACES. Sponsoring. Jean BELLISSARD a. Collaboration:

Universality of transport coefficients in the Haldane-Hubbard model

The Superfluid-Insulator transition

Symmetry, Topology and Phases of Matter

Electrons in a periodic potential

Topological Insulators

Braid Group, Gauge Invariance and Topological Order

Quantum Hydrodynamics models derived from the entropy principle

Topological insulator part II: Berry Phase and Topological index

Quantum Quenches in Chern Insulators

Geometric derivation of

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD

CONTINUITY WITH RESPECT TO DISORDER OF THE INTEGRATED DENSITY OF STATES

The Quantum Hall Effects

Introductory lecture on topological insulators. Reza Asgari

Gabor Frames for Quasicrystals II: Gap Labeling, Morita Equivale

5 Topological insulator with time-reversal symmetry

Topological Insulators and Superconductors

NONCOMMUTATIVE. GEOMETRY of FRACTALS

Bloch Theory for 1D-FLC Aperiodic Media

Beyond the Quantum Hall Effect

Floquet Topological Insulators and Majorana Modes

Two Dimensional Chern Insulators, the Qi-Wu-Zhang and Haldane Models

Thouless conductance, Landauer-Büttiker currents and spectrum

Integer Quantum Hall Effect

Topological insulators. Pavel Buividovich (Regensburg)

Organizing Principles for Understanding Matter

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

Lecture 4: Basic elements of band theory

Topological insulator with time-reversal symmetry

Magnets, 1D quantum system, and quantum Phase transitions

Ψ ν ), if ν is ω-normal, Ψω Ψ ν

Geometric responses of Quantum Hall systems

Topological pumps and topological quasicrystals

3.14. The model of Haldane on a honeycomb lattice

1D-Quantum Systems. a review ( ) Sponsoring. Jean BELLISSARD. NSF grant No

Mathematical Analysis of a Generalized Chiral Quark Soliton Model

Topological Kondo Insulators!

The Noncommutative Geometry of Aperiodic Solids

Single particle Green s functions and interacting topological insulators

Semiclassical Electron Transport

Metals: the Drude and Sommerfeld models p. 1 Introduction p. 1 What do we know about metals? p. 1 The Drude model p. 2 Assumptions p.

Symmetries in Quantum Transport : From Random Matrix Theory to Topological Insulators. Philippe Jacquod. U of Arizona

Rotation Numbers, Boundary Forces and Gap Labelling

Cyclic cohomology of projective limits of topological algebras

THE TOPOLOGY of TILING SPACES

Evolution of the Second Lowest Extended State as a Function of the Effective Magnetic Field in the Fractional Quantum Hall Regime

The Topology of Tiling Spaces

Aperiodic Hamiltonians

Math. Res. Lett. 13 (2006), no. 1, c International Press 2006 ENERGY IDENTITY FOR ANTI-SELF-DUAL INSTANTONS ON C Σ.

Minimal Update of Solid State Physics

A Toy Model. Viscosity

POEM: Physics of Emergent Materials

Welcome to the Solid State

T-duality and the Bulk-Boundary Correspondence

Lecture 2: Open quantum systems

The Localization Dichotomy for Periodic Schro dinger Operators

H ψ = E ψ. Introduction to Exact Diagonalization. Andreas Läuchli, New states of quantum matter MPI für Physik komplexer Systeme - Dresden

Relativistic magnetotransport in graphene

Matthias Täufer (TU Chemnitz)

physics Documentation

We denote the space of distributions on Ω by D ( Ω) 2.

Topological Phases of Matter Out of Equilibrium

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.oa] 4 Jan 2007 JAN M. CAMERON

Effective Field Theories of Topological Insulators

What is a topological insulator? Ming-Che Chang Dept of Physics, NTNU

Introduction to Theory of Mesoscopic Systems

Semiconductor Physics and Devices Chapter 3.

Optical Flux Lattices for Cold Atom Gases

Topological Bandstructures for Ultracold Atoms

Transcription:

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 1 The NON COMMUTATIVE GEOMETRY of the INTEGER QUANTUM HALL EFFECT Jean BELLISSARD 1 2 Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse & Institut Universitaire de France Collaborations: H. SCHULZ-BALDES (Technische Universität, Berlin) D. SPEHNER (IRSAMC, Toulouse) A. Van ELST (Toulouse) 1 I.R.S.A.M.C., Université Paul Sabatier, 118, route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 04, France 2 e-mail: jeanbel@irsamc2.ups-tlse.fr

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 2 I - INTRODUCTION to the IQHE J. Bellissard, H. Schulz-Baldes, A. van Elst, J. Math. Phys., 35, (1994), 5373-5471.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 3 E B _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + j B = magnetic field j = current density E = n = Hall electric field charge carrier density I.1)- The Classical Hall Effect: In the stationnary state: e n E + j B = 0 ( ) 0 σh j = E, σ σ H 0 H = ne B. Units : where : n B = [ ] 1 flux, h e ν = nh eb = [flux] ν = [1]. = filling factor. Hall s formula σ H = ν, R H = h = 25 812.80 Ω. R H e2

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 4 I.2)- The (Integer) Quantum Hall Effect: Conditions of observation: 1. Low temperatures ( few Kelvins) 2. Large sample size ( few µm) 3. High mobility together with large enough quenched disorder. 4. 2D fermion fluid. Experiments show that: 1. Very flat plateaux at ν close to integers, namely if: σ H = i i = 1, 2, 3, quantization (Von Klitzing et al.) R H 2. On plateaux δσ H /σ H and σ // /σ H 10 8. This indicates localization (Prange, Thouless, Halperin). 3. For i 2, Coulomb interaction becomes negligible. Questions: 1. Why is σ H quantized? 2. What is the rôle of localization?

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 5 I.3)- Earlier Works: R.B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. B23, 5632 (1981). Piercing the plane at x with a flux tube adiabatically varying from 0 to φ 0 = h/e forces 1 charge per filled Landau level to transfer from x to. This adiabatic change induces a unitary tranformation on the Landau Hamiltonian (gauge transformation). This gives the quantization of the Hall conductance. R.E. Prange, Phys. Rev. B23, 4802 (1981). D.J. Thouless, J. Phys. C14, 3475 (1981). R. Joynt, R.E. Prange, Phys. Rev. B29, 3303 (1984). Localized states do not see the adiabatic change! B E C j

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 6 D. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. Nightingale, M. den Nijs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982). J.E. Avron, R. Seiler, B. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 51 (1983). Harper s model: one electron on a square lattice in a uniform magnetic field. Magnetic translations U 1, U 2, satisfy: U 1 U 2 = e 2ıπα U 2 U 1, α = φ φ 0 = Ba2 h/e. Harper s Hamiltonian: H H = U 1 + U 1 1 + U 2 + U 1 2. a U 2 U 1 φ a = φ = lattice spacing flux through unit cell U -1 1 U -1 2

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 7 If α = p/q then H H is q-periodic; Bloch theory wave function Ψ depends on quasimomenta k = (k 1, k 2 ). k B where B T 2 is the Brillouin zone. Ψ defines a line bundle over B. Non triviality controlled by the Chern class Ch(Ψ) = 1 π 2π 0 dk 1 2π 0 dk 2 Im < Ψ k 1 Ψ k 2 > Ch(Ψ) Z and is homotopy invariant. Ψ k k

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 8 Assume Fermi level E F lies in a gap. Assume N bands E 1 ( k) < < E N ( k) < E F < E N + 1 ( k) below Fermi level. Set P F = i N Ψ i >< Ψ i (Fermi projection). Set Ch(P F ) = i N Ch(Ψ i). The following holds true: d 2 k ( Ch(P F ) = 2ıπ T 2 4π Tr P 2 F ( k) [ 1 P F ( k), 2 P F ( ) k)] Then Hall conductance is given by the Chern-Kubo formula σ H = e2 h Ch(P F) Hall conductivity is quantized from topological origin.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 9 I.4)- Difficulties with Earlier Works 1. If the magnetic flux is irrational no Bloch theory! 2. Disorder destroys also periodicity no Bloch theory! 3. Robustness against small disorder suggested from the Kubo-Chern formula, (see H. Kunz, Commun. Math. Phys. 112, 121 (1987). ). But a general proof is needed. 4. How does one understand localization in this context? Proposal 1)- J. Bellissard, in Lecture Notes in Phys., n 153, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, (1982). 2)- J. Bellissard, in Lecture Notes in Physics 257, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, (1986). Use C -algebras and their Non Commutative Geometry!

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 10 II - The NON COMMUTATIVE BRILLOUIN ZONE J. Bellissard, in From Number Theory to Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1992).

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 11 II.1)- The Hull of Aperiodic Media II.1.1- A typical Hamiltonian The Schrödinger Hamiltonian for an electron submitted to atomic forces is given by (ignoring interactions): H = 1 2m ( P q A(. ) ) 2 + K r=1 y L r v r (. y). acting on H = L 2 (R d ). d : physical space dimension r = 1,..., K labels the atomic species, L r : set of positions of atoms of type r, v r : effective potential for valence electrons near an atom of type r, m and q : mass and charge of the carrier, P = ı : momentum operator, A : magnetic vector potential.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 12 II.1.2- Magnetic translations In d = 2, uniform magnetic field B = 1 A 2 2 A 1. Magnetic translations U( a) = e ı a 0 d s ( P q A( s ) ) Weyl s commutations relations U( a) U( b) = e ıq B a b U( b) U( a) Translation invariance of the kinetic part. ( ) 2 ( ) 2 U( a) P qa(. ) U( a) 1 = P qa(. ) Translation of the potential U( a) V (. ) U( a) 1 = V (. a)

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 13 II.1.3- The Hull The set {H a = U(a)HU(a) 1 ; a R 2 } of translated of H, is endowed with the strong-resolvent topology. Let Ω be its closure and ω (0) be the representative of H. Definition 1 The operator H is homogeneous if Ω is compact. (Ω, R 2 ) becomes a dynamical system, the Hull of H. It is topologically transitive (one dense orbit). The action is denoted by ω τ a ω (a R 2 ). If the potential V is continuous, there is a continuous function ˆv on Ω such that if ω Ω the corresponding operator H ω is a Schrödinger operator with potential V ω (x) = ˆv(τ x ω). Covariance U(a)H ω U(a) 1 = H τ a ω The observable algebra A H is the C -algebra generated by bounded functions of the H a s. It is related to the twisted crossed product C (Ω R 2, B).

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 14 II.2)- The C -algebra C (Ω R 2, B) II.2.1- Definition Endow A 0 = C c (Ω R 2 ) with (here A, A A 0 ): 1. Product A A (ω, x) = y R 2 d 2 ya(ω, y)a (τ y ω, x y)e ıqb 2 x x 2. Involution A (ω, x) = A(τ x ω, x) 3. A faithfull family of representations in H = L 2 (R 2 ) π ω (A)ψ( x) = if A A 0, ψ H. 4. C -norm R 2 d 2 ya(τ x ω, y x)e ıqb 2 y x ψ( y). A = sup π ω (A). ω Ω Definition 2 The C -algebra A = C (Ω R 2, B) is the completion of A 0 under this norm.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 15 II.2.2- Tight-Binding Representation J. Bellissard, in Lecture Notes in Physics 257, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, (1986). 1. If L is the original set of atomic positions, let Σ be the closure of the set {τ x ω (0) Ω; x L}. Σ is a transversal. 2. Replace Ω R 2 by Γ = {(ω, x) Ω R 2 ; ω Σ, τ x ω Σ }. Γ is a groupoid. 3. Replace integral over R 2 by discrete sum over x. 4. Replace A 0 by C c (Γ), the space of continuous function with compact support on Γ. Then proceed as before to get C (Γ, B). 5. C (Γ, B) is unital. 6. One can restrict the original Hamiltonian H to a spectral bounded interval (in practice near the Fermi level), so as to get an effective Hamiltonian H eff in C (Γ, B). Thus H eff is bounded.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 16 II.2.3- Calculus Let P be an R 2 -invariant ergodic probability measure on Ω. Then set (for A A 0 )): T (A) = dpa(ω, 0) = < 0 π ω (A)0 > dis. Ω Then T extends as a positive trace on A. T is a trace per unit volume, thanks to Birkhoff s theorem: 1 T (A) = lim Λ R 2 Λ Tr(π ω(a) Λ ) a.e. ω A commuting set of -derivations is given by i A(ω, x) = ıx i A(ω, x) defined on A 0. It satisfies π ω ( i A) = ı[x i, π ω (A)] where X = (X 1, X 2 ) are the coordinates of the position operator.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 17 II.2.4- Properties of A Theorem 1 Let L be a periodic lattice in R 2. If H is L-invariant, A is isomorphic to C(B) K, where B is the Brillouin zone and K is the C -algebra of compact operators. A is the non commutative analog of the space of continuous functions on the Brillouin zone : it will be called the Non Commutative Brillouin zone. Theorem 2 Let H be a homogeneous Schrödinger operator with hull Ω. Then for any z C\σ(H) there is an element R(z) A (which is C ), such that π ω (R(z)) = (z1 H ω ) 1 for all ω Ω. Moreover, the spectrum of R(z) is given by σ(r(z)) = {(z ζ) 1 ; ζ Σ}, Σ = ω Ω σ(h ω )

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 18 II.2.5- IDoS and Shubin s formula Let P be an invariant ergodic probability on Ω. Let 1 N (E) = lim Λ R 2 Λ # {eigenvalues of H ω Λ E} It is the Integrated Density of states or IDoS. The limit above exists P-almost surely and N (E) = T (χ(h E)) (Shubin, 1976) χ(h E) is the eigenprojector of H in L (A). N is non decreasing, non negative and constant on gaps. N (E) = 0 for E < inf Σ. For E N (E) N 0 (E) where N 0 is the IDoS of the free case (namely V = 0). dn /de = n dos defines a Stieljes measure called the Density of States or DOS.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 19 - An example of IDoS -

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 20 II.2.6- States We consider states on A of the form A A T {ρa}, with ρ 0 and T {ρ} = n if n is the charge carrier density. Then The Fermi-Dirac state: ρ L 1 (A, T ) describes equilibrium of a fermion gas of independent particles at inverse temperature β = 1/k B T and chemical potential µ: ρ β, µ = 1 1 + e β(h µ) µ is fixed by the normalization condition T {ρ β, µ } = n.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 21 II.3)- To Summarize 1. The C -algebra A = C (Ω R 2, B) is a Non Commutative analog of the space of continuous functions over the Brillouin zone B if the lattice of atoms is no longer periodic, or if there is a magnetic field. 2. A groupoid Γ associated to the discrete set of atomic positions, gives rise to tight-binding models. 3. Calculus on A is available and generalizes the usual calculus on B. 4. Textbook formulæ valid for perfect crystals can be easily generalized using this calculus. If P F is the zero temperature limit of the Fermi-Dirac state, constrained by T (P F ) = n, the expression Ch(P F ) = 2ıπT (P F [ 1 P F, 2 P F ] ) is valid at least if E F = µ T = 0 belongs to a gap of the energy spectrum..

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 22 III - The FOUR TRACE WAY J. Bellissard, H. Schulz-Baldes, A. van Elst, J. Math. Phys., 35, (1994), 5373-5471.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 23 III.1)- The Kubo Formula III.1.1- Background The (non dissipative) current is J = q d X dt = ıq [H, X] = q H The thermal average of A A < A > β, µ = T (A ρ β, µ ) The Liouville operator acts on A L H = ı [H,. ] A dissipative evolution requires an operator C acting on A such that exp{ tc} : A A is a completely positive contraction semigroup. C has the dimension of [time] 1. The (dissipative) evolution, with a uniform electric field, is given by the Master Equation: da dt = L H(A) + q E. A C(A)

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 24 III.1.2- Linear Response Theory The thermal averaged current satifies: j = < q d X dt > β, µ = σ E + O( E 2 ) The 2 2 matrix σ is the conductivity tensor. It is given by Kubo s formula σ ij = q2 T ( ) 1 j ρ β, µ ( C L i H) H C usually depends on T so that as T 0, C 0. We have lim T 0 ρ β, µ = P F.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 25 Theorem 3 Let assume 1. The Fermi level E F is not a discontinuity point of the DOS of H. 2. lim T 0 C = 0. 3. P F is Sobolev differentiable: T {( P F ) 2 } <. Then, as T 0, the conductivity tensor converges to σ ij = q2 h 2ıπ T ( P F [ i P F, j P F ] ). In particular the direct conductivity vanishes and σ 12 = σ H = q2 h Ch(P F)

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 26 III.2)- The Four Traces On every Hilbert space H, the usual trace is denoted by Tr. In A we have the trace per unit volume T, associated to a translation invariant probability measure P on the Hull. III.2.1- Dixmier s Traces J. Dixmier, C.R.A.S., 1107 (1966). On a Hilbert space H, L p (H) denotes the Schatten ideal of those compact operator on H such that Tr( T p ) <. Given T a compact operator on H, let µ 0 µ n... 0 be its singular values (eigenvalues of T ) labelled in decreasing order. Set T p+ = ( lim sup n N 1 ln N N 1 n = 0 µ p n ) 1/p The set of {T ; T p+ < } is denoted by L p+ (H). This a Mačaev ideal.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 27 Theorem 4 Set L p (H) = {T compact; T p+ = 0}. 1. L p (H) and L p+ (H) are two-sided ideals in L(H). 2. For p < p [0, ), L p (H) L p (H) L p+ (H) L p (H) 3. T p+ is a seminorm making L p+ (H)/L p (H) a Banach space. Given a euclidean invariant mean M on R, one can define a linear form Lim M on l (N) such that (i) Lim M (a 0, a 1, a 2, ) = Lim M (a 1, a 2, a 3, ), (ii) Lim M (a 0, a 1, a 2, ) = Lim M (a 0, a 0, a 1, a 1, ), (iii) if a l (N) converges, Lim M (a) = lim n a n. The Dixmier trace associated to M is given by ( ) N 1 1 Tr Dix (T ) = Lim M µ n. ln N if T L 1+ (H) is positive. n = 0 Tr Dix can be extended as a positive continuous linear form on L 1+ (H) vanishing on L 1 (H) such that Tr Dix (UT U 1 ) = Tr Dix (T ), Tr Dix (ST ) = Tr Dix (T S) for U L(H) unitary and S, T L 1+ (H).

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 28 III.2.2- Graded Trace and Fredholm Module M. Atiyah, K-Theory, (Benjamin, New York, 1967). A. Connes, Publ. IHES, 62, 257 (1986). Set Ĥ = H C2 with H = L 2 (R 2 ). The grading operator G is ( ) +1 0 G = 0 1 T T L(Ĥ) has degree 0 if GT T G = 0 L(Ĥ) has degree 1 if GT + T G = 0. The graded commutator is given by [T, T ] S = T T ( ) d T.d T T T A degree 1 operator F is defined by ( ) 0 u F = u 0 where u = X/ X and X = X 1 +ıx 2 is the position operator. Then F = F, F 2 = 1. A differential d with d 2 = 0 is given by dt = [F, T ] S

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 29 The Leibniz rule becomes d(t T ) = dt T + ( ) d T T dt A graded trace is defined as Tr S (T ) = 1 Tr(GF dt ) 2 if dt L 1 (Ĥ). Tr S is linear and satisfies dt, dt L 1 (Ĥ), Tr S([T, T ] S ) = 0 Note: 1. Tr S is not positive in general. 2. u = X/ X coincides precisely with the singular gauge transformation corresponding to piercing the plane adiabatically with one flux quantum. J.E. Avron, R. Seiler, B. Simon, Commun. Math. Phys., 159, 399 (1994).

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 30 III.3)- Connes Formulæ III.3.1- First Connes Formula Let A = C (Ω R 2, B) acts on Ĥ by ˆπ ω = π ω id through degree 0 elements. First Connes Formula : for A A 0 and P-almost all ω s: T ( A 2 ) = 1 π Tr Dix ( dˆπ ω (A) 2 ) Let S be the Non Commutative Sobolev space namely the Hilbert space generated by A A 0 such that T ( A 2 + A 2 ) <. Then 2+ A S dˆπ ω (A) L (Ĥ) Also dˆπ ω (A) is compact for any A A.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 31 III.3.2- A Cyclic 2-cocycle For A 0, A 1, A 2 A 0, a cyclic 2-cocycle is defined by T 2 (A 0, A 1, A 2 ) = 2ıˆπT (A 0 1 A 1 2 A 2 A 0 2 A 1 1 A 2 ) This trilinear form extends by continuity to S. T 2 is cyclic T 2 (A 0, A 1, A 2 ) = T 2 (A 2, A 0, A 1 ) T 2 is Hochschild closed 0 = (bt 2 ) (A 0, A 1, A 2, A 3 ) T 2 (A 0 A 1, A 2, A 3 ) T 2 (A 0, A 1 A 2, A 3 ) +T 2 (A 0, A 1, A 2 A 3 ) T 2 (A 3 A 0, A 1, A 2 ) Second Connes Formula : for A i A 0 : T 2 (A 0, A 1, A 2 ) = Ω dp Tr S (ˆπ ω (A 0 )dˆπ ω (A 1 )dˆπ ω (A 2 ))

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 32 III.4)- Quantization of Hall conductivity Recall that at T = 0, the Hall conductivity becomes σ H = e2 Ch(P F) III.4.1- Fredholm Index Fact 1 : let P be a projection on H and ˆP = P 1 2. If d ˆP L 3 (H) then P up is Fredholm on P H and ( ) Tr S ˆP d ˆP d ˆP = Ind (P up P H ) Z Fact 2 : d ˆP L 3 (H) (up u P ) L 3 (H) and Ind (P up P H ) = Tr ((up u P ) 2n + 1 ) n 1 Thus Ind(P up P H ) measures the increase of the dimension of P H after applying u.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 33 III.4.2- Ch(P F ) is an integer Assume : P F S. Then dˆπ ω (P F ) L 2+ (H) L 3 (H) (1st Connes formula). By the 2nd Connes formula we get Ch(P F ) = Ω dp Tr S (ˆπ ω (P F )dˆπ ω (P F )dˆπ ω (P F )) The r.h.s. is the disordered average of n(ω) = Ind(π ω (P F )uπ ω (P F ) πω (P F )H) Z By covariance one gets n(τ x ω) = n(ω) P-almost all ω and x R 2 Since P is invariant ergodic, n(ω) is almost surely constant so that P F S Ch(P F ) Z and Ch(P F ) measures the number of states created if one applies u namely the Laughlin singular gauge transformation! This is indeed the number of charges sent at.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 34 III.4.3- Existence of Plateaux The Fermi level E F is defined as the limit as T 0 of the chemical potential µ, constrained to T (ρ β, µ ) = n where n is the charge carrier density. Experimentally one can change E F either by changing the magnetic field B or by changing n. Both ways are used in practice. Remark that P S Ch(P ) Z is continuous thanks to Connes formulæ. Since P F = χ(h E F ), if we assume that the map E F (E, E + ) P F S is continuous (for the Sobolev norm), then Ch(P F ) stay constant for E F in the interval (E, E + )! This is the mechanism through which plateaux occur in the Hall conductivity. In the next section we will see that the condition P F S is a consequence of the existence of localized states around the Fermi level.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 35 IV - LOCALIZATION and TRANSPORT J. Bellissard, H. Schulz-Baldes, A. van Elst, J. Math. Phys., 35, (1994), 5373-5471. J. Bellissard, H. Schulz-Baldes, Rev. Math. Phys., 10, 1-46 (1998). J. Bellissard, H. Schulz-Baldes, J. Stat. Phys., 91, (1998), 991-1026. J. Bellissard, D. Spehner, work in progress.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 36 IV.1)- Localization Theory IV.1.1- Definitions The DOS of H = H affiliated to A, was defined as the Stieljies-Lebesgue measure dn (E) = dt (P E ) with P E = χ(h E). For R borelian, we set P = χ(h ). The non dissipative current is given by J = q/ H. The current-current correlation is the measure m defined on R R by: R R m(de, de )f(e)g(e ) = T ( ) f(h) H g(h) H for f, g continuous functions with compact support on R. In physicists notations (ignoring q/ ) m(de, de ) = < E J E > 2 If H ω is the representative of H associated to ω Ω we set X ω (t) = e ı t H ω Xe ı t H ω

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 37 IV.1.2- Localization Length Given R borelian, the average localization length l( ) of states with energy within is defined through the following steps 1. Project the initial state x > on : π ω (P ) x >. 2. Measure the distance it goes during time t by applying ( X ω (t) X)π ω (P ) x > 3. Square it to get the quantum average, average over time average over disorder to get L (t) 2 = 1 t t 0 ds s Ω dp < x π ω (P )( X ω (t) X) 2 π ω (P ) x > 4. Then l( ) = lim sup t L (t) Fact : L (t) 2 = 1 t t 0 ds s T ( e ı t H 2 P ) Thus the localization length is algebraic and independent of the representation of the Hamiltonian!

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 38 IV.1.3- Localization: Results Assume l( ) < : 1. The spectrum of H ω in is pure point almost surely w.r.t. ω: all states in are localized. 2. There is an N -measurable function l on such that for any borelian, l( ) = dn (E)l(E)2 l(e) is the localization length at energy E 3. One has l( ) = Ω where P {E}, ω energy E. dp d 2 x x 2 R 2 4. One also gets: l( ) = 2 E σ pp (H ω ) < 0 P {E}, ω x > 2 is the eigenprojection of H ω on the R m(de, de ) E E 2 5. If [E 0, E 1 ] P E1 P E0 S E1 E 0 (1 + l 2 )dn

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 39 IV.1.4- Existence of Plateaux From the previous results P F S as long as E F belongs to a region of localized states. Thus localization existence of plateaux for the Hall conductivity. From previous results by Fröhlich & Spencer, Aizenman & Molčanov, the localization length is finite at high disorder for the Anderson model. More recent results by Combes & Hislop, W.M. Wang, the same is true for the Landau Hamiltonian with a random potential, at least O(B )-away from the Landau levels.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 40 IV.2)- Kinetic Theory for Electronic Transport IV.2.1- Mott s Variable Range Hopping B. Shklovskii, A. L. Effros, Electronic Properties of Doped Semiconductors, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984). Strongly localized regime, dimension d Low electronic DOS, Low temperature Absorption-emission of a phonon of energy ε P rob e ε/k BT Tunnelling probability at distance r P rob e r/ξ Density of state at Fermi level n F ε n F r d 1 Optimizing, the conductivity satisfies σ e (T 0/T ) 1/d+1 Mott s law Optimal energy ε opt T d/(d+1) T Optimal distance r opt 1/T 1/(d+1) ξ

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 41 Energy ε ε 2 E F ε 1 distance r - Mott s Variable Range Hopping -

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 42 IV.2.2- The Drude model Drude, (1900). Electrons in a metal are free classical particles of mass m and charge q. Electron density is n. Collisions occur at random poissonian times < t 1 < t 0 < < t n+1 < with < t n+1 t n >= τ rel If p n is the electron momentum between times t n and t n+1, then the p n+1 p n s are independent random variables distributed according to the Maxwell distribution at temperature T. Then the conductivity follows the Drude formula σ = q2 n m τ rel

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 43 random scatterers test particle p 4 p p 1 2 p 3 - The Drude Kinetic Model -

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 44 IV.2.2- Quantum Drude model D. Spehner, J. Bellissard, in progress. 1. Replace the classical motion by the quantum one in the homogeneous system with Hamiltonian H. 2. Replace collisions by quantum jumps indexed by r at random poissonian times < t (r) 1 < t(r) 0 < < t (r) n+1 < with < t (r) n+1 t(r) n >= Γ 1 r 3. At collision of type r the density matrix changes for some operator K r. ρ K r(ρ) 4. The dissipation operator is 5. Assume: C (ρ) = r Γ r (ρ K r(ρ)) (a) If ρ L 1 (A, T ) then C (ρ) L 1 (A, T ), (b) exp{ C }(ρ) 0 if ρ 0, (c) exp{ C } leaves T invariant.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 45 IV.2.2- The Master Equation The electronic Hamiltonian with electric field is H ω, E = H ω q E. X The evolution of the density matrix is given by ρ(t) = η t t n K r n η t n t n 1 K r 1 η t 1 (ρ) if 1. t 0 0 < t 1 < < t n t < t n+1 are the collision times and r 1,, r n the corresponding quantum jumps. 2. ηt is the action on states of the quantum evolution associated to H ω, E. Theorem 5 The collision average evolution of an initial state ρ L 1 (A, T ) is given by : d ρ { = L dt H + q E C } ρ

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 46 IV.2.3- The Conductivity Theorem 6 The (time, thermal, quantum) averaged current follows linear response theory. The corresponding AC-conductivity tensor at frequency ω 0 is given by the Kubo formula: σ i,j = q T { i (ρ β, µ ) (C L H ı ω 0 ) 1 (J j ) } where ρ β, µ is the (Fermi-Dirac) equilibrium state at inverse temperature β and chemical potential µ and C is the dual action of C on A. The Relaxation Time Approximation (RTA), consists in setting C (ρ) = ρ β, µ (immediate return to equilibrium after each collision) namely C = 1/τ where τ is the relaxation time. In the limit of zero dissipation τ, the conductivity tests the spectral properties of L H near ıω 0 on the imaginary axis.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 47 IV.3)- Why are Hall Plateaux so Flat? IV.3.1- Deviations from Ideal Hall System The theorems concerning the Hall conductance quantization requires the following conditions The sample has infinite area in space. The electric field is vanishingly small. The temperature vanishes. The collision operator C vanishes at zero temperature. Questions : Can one estimate the error when we are away from these conditions? 1. Can one estimate the error when we are away from these conditions? 2. If Yes, can one explain the accuracy of the plateaux?

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 48 Results : It is possible to show that the accuracy of plateaux is limited only by the dissipation mechanisms in practice. The size of the sample, the electric field, the temperature can be arranged so that they do not contribute. An estimate of the dissipation based upon the RTA gives the following estimate δσ H const ν e σ H h µ c where ν is the filling factor, l is the localization length (typically of the order of 100Å) and µ c is the mobility of the sample. Putting realistic numbers in it leads to δσ H 10 4 σ H far from 10 8 that are observed! The origin of this discrepancy is due to Mott s variable range hopping. D. Polyakov, B. Shklovskii, Phys. Rev., B48, 11167, (1993). l 2

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 49 IV.3.1- A Quantum Jump Model At very low temperature, conduction electrons are confined in the impurity band of the semiconductor. A tight-binding approximation suffices. Let L ω be the impurity lattice. Wave functions belong to H ω = l 2 (L ω ). Jumps are labelled by pairs x y of sites in L ω. Whenever the jump x y occurs, the wave function changes according to ψ W x y ψ = (1 + ( y > x >) < x )ψ Following the Mott argument one assumes that the probability of such process is (x) V (y) ( V Γ x y e k B T + x y ξ ) where V (x) = V ω (x) is the (random) potential energy seen by the electron at site x, and ξ is the localization length.

QHE Adelaide August 16-20 1999 50 Claim :(in progress) this model leads to a correction term ( ) δσ H const e T0 1/3 T ν e l 2 σ H h µ c according to Mott s law. Remark : 1. Shklovskii & Efros have argued that the DOS must vanish linearly at the Fermi level, due to Coulomb interaction. 2. It should be possible to design the Hamiltonian to take this remark into account. 3. If the DOS vanishes at the Fermi level, the exponent 1/3 changes into 1/2 which is observed in experiments