Today: Part I: Neutrino oscillations: beam experiments. Part II: Next tutorials: making distributions with histograms and ntuples

Similar documents
AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF NEUTRINO PHYSICS. Kate Scholberg, Duke University TASI 2008, Boulder, CO

Long Baseline Neutrinos

The First Results of K2K long-baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 11 May 2017

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

Neutrino Oscillations

Long Baseline Neutrino Experiments

Recent Results from Alysia Marino, University of Colorado at Boulder Neutrino Flux Workshop, University of Pittsburgh, Dec 6 8,2012

Status and Neutrino Oscillation Physics Potential of the Hyper-Kamiokande Project in Japan

The T2K Neutrino Experiment

NEUTRINOS II The Sequel

Recent Results from K2K. Masashi Yokoyama (Kyoto U.) For K2K collaboration 2004 SLAC Summer Institute

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 2 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

Neutrino Cross Section Measurements for Long-Baseline Acceleratorbased Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

Super-Kamiokande: The Road to Neutrino Oscillations

K2K and T2K experiments

The NOνA Experiment and the Future of Neutrino Oscillations

Neutrino Oscillations and the Matter Effect

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 5 Mar 2004

A method for detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

Accelerator Neutrino Experiments News from Neutrino 2010 Athens

Application of GLoBES: GLACIER on conventional neutrino beams

PoS(FPCP2017)023. Latest results from T2K. Jennifer Teresa Haigh, for the T2K Collaboration

Recent Results from T2K and Future Prospects

Detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

Neutrinos From The Sky and Through the Earth

Discovery of the Neutrino Mass-I. P1X* Frontiers of Physics Lectures October 2004 Dr Paul Soler University of Glasgow

Indication of ν µ ν e appearance in the T2K EXPERIMENT

Future Experiments with Super Neutrino Beams

EXPLORING PARTICLE-ANTIPARTICLE ASYMMETRY IN NEUTRINO OSCILLATION. Atsuko K. Ichikawa, Kyoto University

Measurement of q 13 in Neutrino Oscillation Experiments. Stefan Roth, RWTH Aachen Seminar, DESY, 21 st /22 nd January 2014

Neutrino mixing II. Can ν e ν µ ν τ? If this happens:

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

UNIT1: Experimental Evidences of Neutrino Oscillation Atmospheric and Solar Neutrinos

Perspectives of neutrino oscillation physics with long baseline beams

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

Final results from K2K and status of T2K

NEW νe Appearance Results from the. T2K Experiment. Matthew Malek Imperial College London. University of Birmingham HEP Seminar 13 June 2012

PoS(Nufact08)003. Status and Prospects of Long Baseline ν Oscillation Experiments

Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

The CNGS neutrino beam

Results from T2K. Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 25 Aug 2015

New Results from the MINOS Experiment

Explorations of Neutrino Flux from the NuMI Beam at Different Positions From the Beam Axis

The T2K experiment Results and Perspectives. PPC2017 Corpus Christi Mai 2017 Michel Gonin On behalf of the T2K collaboration

Neutrino Oscillation and CP violation

Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

Long & Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Studies at Intense Proton Sources. Jeff Nelson College of William & Mary

Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

Existing and future long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments

Neutrino Mass Hierarchy and Mixing Parameters: Long-baseline Measurements with IceCube Laura Bodine

Physics Potential of existing and future LBL ν beams

Long Baseline Neutrinos: As Far From A Tabletop Experiment As You Can Get. Scott Oser UBC. Colloquium at Toronto. October 20, 2011

Hadron Production Experiments and Neutrino Beams

First neutrino beam and cosmic tracks. GDR neutrino

Figure 1 Overview of the T2K experiment

Why understanding neutrino interactions is important for oscillation physics


Neutrino Cross Sections and Scattering Physics

K2K and T2K. 2006/10/19 For the 2006 External Review Panel. Masato Shiozawa Kamioka Observatory

PoS(HEP2005)177. Status of the OPERA experiment. Francesco Di Capua. Universita Federico II and INFN.

Neutrino Oscillations

Astroparticle physics

From Here to a Neutrino Factory: Neutrino Oscillations Now and Again

Neutrino Oscillations Physics at DUNE

JHFnu at J-PARC neutrino oscillation experiment

RECENT RESULTS FROM THE OPERA EXPERIMENT

Super-Kamiokande ~The Status of n Oscillation ~

Review Article Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

Neutrinos & the MINOS Experiment

Neutrino Oscillations

Longbase Neutrino Physics. Neil McCauley University of Liverpool Birmingham February 2013

Analyzing Data. PHY310: Lecture 16. Road Map

Latest results of OPERA

MiniBooNE, LSND, and Future Very-Short Baseline Experiments

Atmospheric Neutrinos and Neutrino Oscillations

10 Neutrino Oscillations

1. Neutrino Oscillations

The CERN-Gran Sasso Neutrino Program

Analysis of muon and electron neutrino charged current interactions in the T2K near detectors

Neutrinos Induced Pion Production in MINERvA

Neutrino Oscillation Measurements, Past and Present. Art McDonald Queen s University And SNOLAB

Neutrino sources. Atmospheric neutrinos Solar neutrinos Supernova neutrinos High energy neutrino sources Cosmic neutrino background

The HARP Experiment. G. Vidal-Sitjes (INFN-Ferrara) on behalf of the HARP Collaboration

The First Large Application of MPPC: T2K Neutrino Beam Monitor INGRID

Performance of the ICARUS T600 detector

Atmospheric neutrinos with Super-Kamiokande S.Mine (University of California, Irvine) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration

( Some of the ) Lateset results from Super-Kamiokande

MiniBooNE Progress and Little Muon Counter Overview

Sterile Neutrino Experiments at Accelerator

MINOS Oscillation Results from The First Year of NuMI Beam Operation

Review of Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

Characterisation of Silicon Photomultipliers for the T2K Experiment

An Introduction to Modern Particle Physics. Mark Thomson University of Cambridge

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 30 Nov 2009

T2K and other long baseline experiments (bonus: reactor experiments) Justyna Łagoda

Review of νe Appearance Oscillation Experiments

Detectors for astroparticle physics

ν?? Solar & Atmospheric Oscillation Experiments Greg Sullivan University of Maryland Aspen Winter Conference January 21, 1999 )Past )Present )Future

Transcription:

Today: Part I: Neutrino oscillations: beam experiments Part II: Next tutorials: making distributions with histograms and ntuples

Super-Kamiokande Physics II: Long Baseline Beams

Neutrino Oscillations Assume FLAVOR STATES nf > weakly interacting are superpositions of MASS STATES nm > unitary mixing matrix N f >= Ufi i > i=1 If mixing matrix is not diagonal, get flavor oscillations as neutrinos propagate

Simple two-flavor case f >= cos 1 > sin > g >= sin 1 > cos > Propagate a distance L: iei t i ( t ) >=e imi L/ p i ( 0) >~e i ( 0) > Probability of detecting flavor g at L: 1.7 m L P ( f g )=sin sin E E in GeV L in km Dm in ev P( )=sin Parameters of nature to measure: q, Dm=m1-

The Experimental Game Start with some neutrinos (natural or artificial) Measure (or calculate) flavor composition and energy spectrum Let them propagate Measure flavor and energies again Have the flavors and energies changed? If so, does the 1.7 m L change follow P( f g )=sin sin E? Disappearance: n's oscillate into 'invisible' flavor e.g. ne nm at ~MeV energies Appearance: directly see new flavor e.g. nm nt at ~GeV energies

Oscillation Parameter Space 1.7 m L P( f g )=sin sin E fast wiggle Twiddle L/E allowed region Frequency DmL/E slow wiggle Amplitude sinq Experimental statistics

Zenith angle distribution FC 1489 days of SK data (SKI) FC+PC e-like m-like up-going down-going Deficit of nm from below (long pathlength)

Next: INDEPENDENT TEST of atmospheric neutrino oscillations using a well-understood n beam En~ GeV, L~ 100's of km for same L/E 1.7 m L P ( f g )=sin sin E LONG BASELINE EXPERIMENTS Compare flux, flavor and energy spectrum at near and far detectors

KK (KEK to Kamioka) Long Baseline Experiment ~ 1 GeV muon neutrinos 1 GeV protons on Al target + p focusing horn + decay pipe for pions Events matched w/gps

The Neutrino Beamline at KEK

The Near Detector (300 m away) (scibar) Characterize the n beam for extrapolation to SK

Results from KK Single-ring m-like events Total 107 beam events observed; expect 149.7 Suppression observed, spectral distortion consistent with oscillations

KK Allowed Oscillation Parameters Best Fit Results: Dm =.8 x 10-3 ev sin(q) = 1.0 (constrained to physical region) Consistent with SK atmospheric

Future Long Baseline Experiments start 005-6, 730 km distance MINOS: Fermilab to Soudan CNGS: CERN to Gran Sasso

NuMI Beamline at Fermilab MINOS Detector at the Soudan mine iron plates + scintillating fibers w/ magnetic field

CNGS CERN Neutrinos to Gran Sasso Look for t neutrinos explicitly

ICARUS Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber "Digital Bubble Chamber"

OPERA lead/emulsion sandwich + scintillator planes Extract bricks for scanning if electronic detector indicates t-like event

TK: "Tokai to Kamioka" Existing detector: Super-K 95 km, about 30 times KK flux.5 deg. off axis

TK ("Tokai to Kamioka") o off-axis Near + km detectors, Super-K refurbished by 006 Start 009 Beam neutrino energy tuned to oscillation minimum

J-PARC beamline under construction now n beam-line decay volume J-PARC Beamline Construction, Jan 004

TK Detectors p p n off-axis on-axis 0m 140m 80m km 95 km 1. Near detector at 80 m: fine-grained tracker. Intermediate detector at km Water Cherenkov + fine-grain tracker (LAr) + muon ranger Beam spectrum looks more like beam at SK cancel systematics 3. Super-K III at 95 km, fully refurbished

Summary Atmospheric muon neutrinos are changing flavor ('disappearing') as they travel through the Earth: This measurement in SK was the first clear indication of neutrino mass and oscillation 1.7 m L P( f g )=sin sin E This oscillation disappearance has now been confirmed with a long-baseline beam of neutrinos: KK results are consistent Next generation: MINOS, CNGS, TK

SK Data Tutorial Today 1. Run superscan to eyeball data files.1 Set up and run sample program to look at charges and times for events. Make and view histograms TODAY (distributions) - Histograms made directly in program - Ntuples made using PAW

Histogram: a distribution of some variable(s) 1D D density of dots number of events in bin Cernlib/PAW: software package that allows manipulation of histogram structures - create histogram - 'fill' with data - output histo to file

Ntuple: list of 'events' and their variables e.g. run no., event no., total charge, mean t 000, 1, 4.,100. 000,, 13.,98. 000, 3,.,984. Note: an 'event' need not be an SK event (trigger); you can make an ntuple of tube hits, or any kinds of items ('event' an item in the list) PAW will allow you to plot distributions of any chosen variable, or any variable vs any other, with 'cuts' (conditions) e.g. nt/plot 1.q%t t>800&&t<1000 means plot charge vs time for times between 800 and 1000 very powerful!

Making a histogram in the program: - Open data file (skopenf) - Loop over events - Read one event (skread) (information stashed locally) - Loop over PMT hits - For each hit, fill charge and time histograms - Close data file (skclosef) - Output histogram to file Later, view histogram with PAW (or Root)

Making simple ntuples: - Open data file (skopenf) - Loop over events - Read one event (skread) (information stashed locally) - Loop over PMT hits - For each hit, output list of variables to a text file - Close data file (skclosef) Later, use PAW to make ntuples from text file, and plot desired variables

Next weeks: I will be in Japan, but other HEP profs (who would like to recruit students for research) will speak