Calculating the suspended sediment load of the Dez River

Similar documents
Technical Review of Pak Beng Hydropower Project (1) Hydrology & Hydraulics and (2) Sediment Transport & River Morphology

Annex 29. Sediment Transport with the Danube River Flow and Sedimentation Rates along the Danube- Black Sea Navigation Route

The Influence of tropical cyclones as soil eroding and sediment transporting events. An example from the Philippines

Suspended sediment yields of rivers in Turkey

An investigation on the impacts of density currents on the sedimentation in dam reservoirs using TCM model; case study: Maroon dam

A distributed runoff model for flood prediction in ungauged basins

Decline of Yangtze River water and sediment discharge: Impact from natural and anthropogenic changes

ADAM ŁAJCZAK Jan Kochanowski University, Institute of Geography, ul. Świętokrzyska 15, Kielce, Poland

State Water Survey Division SURFACE WATER SECTION

Spatial variation in suspended sediment transport in the Murrumbidgee River, New South Wales, Australia

MONITORING OF SURFACE WATER RESOURCES IN THE MINAB PLAIN BY USING THE STANDARDIZED PRECIPITATION INDEX (SPI) AND THE MARKOF CHAIN MODEL

CASE STUDY NATHPA JHAKRI, INDIA

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES

Tarbela Dam in Pakistan. Case study of reservoir sedimentation

2. PRESENT CONDITION OF THE RESERVOIR 2.1 View of Wonogiri Reservoir (1/3)

CASE STUDY BINGA, PHILIPPINES

Appendix O. Sediment Transport Modelling Technical Memorandum

CASE STUDY NATHPA JHAKRI, INDIA

From micro to macro scale the impact on the sediment discharge after construction of the Three Gorges Dam on Yangtze River (Changjiang)

EXCHANGE OF HEAVY METALS BETWEEN SEDIMENT AND WATER IN THE WLOCLAWEK RESERVOIR ON THE VISTULA RIVER

Simulating Sediment Transport in the Patapsco River following Dam Removal with Dam Removal Express Assessment Model-1 (DREAM-1)

Towards the design of a strategy for sampling suspended sediments in small headwater catchments

Technical Memorandum No

Strategies for managing sediment in dams. Iwona Conlan Consultant to IKMP, MRCS

The effectiveness of check dams in controlling upstream channel stability in northeastern Taiwan

Sedimentation in the Nile River

DOMINANT DISCHARGE IN THE KOR RIVER, FARS PROVINCE, IRAN

Influence of the timing of flood events on sediment yield in the north-western Algeria

CASE STUDY BINGA, PHILIPPINES

Floods Lecture #21 20

Technical Memorandum

Determining the Best Method for Estimating the Bed Load through HEC-RAS Model (A Case Study for Taleghan Dam)

1. Evaluation of Flow Regime in the Upper Reaches of Streams Using the Stochastic Flow Duration Curve

Controls on fluvial evacuation of sediment from earthquake-triggered landslides

Summary of the 2017 Spring Flood

Lower Susquehanna River Integrated Sediment & Nutrient Monitoring Program

Stop 1: Marmot Dam Stop 1: Marmot Dam

Assessment of rainfall and evaporation input data uncertainties on simulated runoff in southern Africa

Optimal Artificial Neural Network Modeling of Sedimentation yield and Runoff in high flow season of Indus River at Besham Qila for Terbela Dam

Development and application of demonstration MIKE 21C morphological model for a bend in Mekong River

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Detroit District. Sediment Trap Assessment Saginaw River, Michigan

River Response. Sediment Water Wood. Confinement. Bank material. Channel morphology. Valley slope. Riparian vegetation.

Birecik Dam & HEPP Downstream River Arrangement R. Naderer, G. Scharler Verbundplan GmbH, 5021 Salzburg, Austria

Sources of uncertainty in estimating suspended sediment load

Recent changes of suspended sediment yields in the Upper Yangtze River and its headwater tributaries

Dam Removal Analysis Guidelines for Sediment

Study of the rate of sediment trapping and water loss in the vortex tube structure at different placement angles

DETERMINATION OF SEDIMENT TRAP EFFICIENCY OF SMALL WATER RESERVOIR AT KREMPNA

(case study Karaj watershed)

Technical Note: Hydrology of the Lukanga Swamp, Zambia

Monitoring of suspended sediment concentration in discharge from regulated lakes in glacial deposits

Numerical modeling of sediment flushing from Lewis and Clark Lake

Simulation of sedimentation rates using the SWAT model A case study of the Tarbela Dam, Upper Indus Basin

Badger Flood Situation Report. Robert Picco Amir Ali Khan Ken Rollings. Department of Environment Water Resources Management Division

Estimation of Bed Load Transport in River Omi, South Western Nigeria using Grain Size Distribution Data

Final Report. Prepared for. American Rivers, California Trout, Friends of the River and Trout Unlimited

On the modelling of extreme droughts

SEDIMENT DATA FOR THE LOWER MEKONG

Upgrading Feasibility Study on the Upper Seti Storage Hydroelectric Project in Nepal

Analysis of Sedimentation in Wonogiri Reservoir

Technical Memorandum No Sediment Model

Swift Creek Sediment Management Action Plan (SCSMAP)

Statistical modelling of suspended sediment transport in the Cherf drainage basin, Algeria

GIS Application in Landslide Hazard Analysis An Example from the Shihmen Reservoir Catchment Area in Northern Taiwan

Modeling of long-term sedimentation in the Osijek port basin

A STUDY OF LOCAL SCOUR AT BRIDGE PIERS OF EL-MINIA

How to predict the sedimentological impacts of reservoir operations?

Prediction of landslide-induced debris flow hydrograph: the Atsumari debris flow disaster in Japan

HyMet Company. Streamflow and Energy Generation Forecasting Model Columbia River Basin

Rivers and Streams. Streams. Hydrologic Cycle. Drainage Basins and Divides. Colorado River Drainage Basin. Colorado Drainage Basins.

MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF FLUVIAL SEDIMENT DELIVERY, NEKA RIVER, IRAN. S.E. Kermani H. Golmaee M.Z. Ahmadi

Suspended Sediment Rating Curve for Tigris River Upstream Al- Betera Regulator

The impact of hill land clearance and urbanization on runoff and sediment yield of small catchments in Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

Sediment yield estimation from a hydrographic survey: A case study for the Kremasta reservoir, Western Greece

low turbidity high turbidity

INVESTIGATION OF DOMINANT DISCHARGE TRENDS IN THE GORGANROD WATERSHED, IRAN. M. Habibnejad Karim Soleimani M. Zareii A. Azmoodeh

Volume 3, Issue 4: (2013) (Received: May 27, 2013; Accepted: July 03, 2013; Published: July 30, 2013) ISSN

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

ICHE 2014, Hamburg - Lehfeldt & Kopmann (eds) Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau ISBN

Illinois State Water Survey Division

A Report on a Statistical Model to Forecast Seasonal Inflows to Cowichan Lake

Platte River Flow and Sediment Transport Between North Platte and Grand Island, Nebraska ( )

The influence of a dam on the downstream degradation of a river bed: case study of the Tigris River

THE STATE OF SURFACE WATER GAUGING IN THE NAVAJO NATION

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No )

The Hydrologic Cycle STREAM SYSTEMS. Earth s Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. The Hydrologic Cycle. Hydrologic Cycle

Regional analysis of hydrological variables in Greece

Summary of Hydraulic and Sediment-transport. Analysis of Residual Sediment: Alternatives for the San Clemente Dam Removal/Retrofit Project,

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 154 (2016 )

Hydrological Observatory description. Lisbon. Atlantic Ocean

Sediment Deposition LET THE RIVER RUN T E A C H E R. Activity Overview. Activity at a Glance. Time Required. Level of Complexity.

SPECIFIC DEGRADATION AND RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION. By Renee Vandermause & Chun-Yao Yang

8 Current Issues and Research on Sediment Movement in the River Catchments of Japan

Reactivation of Klingnau reservoir sidearm: Numerical simulation of sediment release downstream

Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River

B805 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES - OPSS 805

Determining the Ability of Acid Extractable Metals as a Fingerprint in Sediment Source Discrimination

Mapping and spatial analysis of suspended sediment yields from the Russian Plain

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Great Lakes Update. Volume 194: 2015 Annual Summary

Transcription:

Erosion and Sediment Transport Monitoring Programmes in River Basins (Proceedings of the Osio Symposium, August 1992). IAHS Publ. no. 210, 1992. 219 Calculating the suspended sediment load of the Dez River A.JAHANI Bureau of Water Resources, Ministry of Energy, Tehran, Iran ABSTRACT The suspended sediment discharge of the Dez River at the Talezang gauging station has been calculated using a variety of suspended sediment discharge/flow relationships. The results obtained have been evaluated by comparison with estimates of sediment load based on surveys of the downstream reservoir. This evaluation demonstrates that the rating relationship based on all available samples produces the most reliable results. INTRODUCTION Supended sediment loads are frequently calculated using suspended sediment discharge/ flow rating relationships. In this case a rating relationship is established by direct sampling and this is subsequently applied to the continuous record of water discharge to estimate the sediment load. As the period of measurement increases in length, both the number of samples available and the length of the discharge record increases and it is necessary to decide how to establish the best rating relationships. It is, for example, possible to derive rating relationships for individual years or for each month, or to use a single rating relationship for the entire period of record. In order to investigate this problem further, a case study has been undertaken using data collected from the Talezang gauging station on the Dez River. This station was selected because it is located upstream of the Dez dam and the estimates of suspended sediment load obtained using rating curves can be compared with the results of reservoir sediment surveys, in order to assess their reliability. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DEZ BASIN The Dez River rises in the Zagross Range and joins the Karun River at Bamdej. The catchment area of the Dez River at its confluence with the Karun is estimated to be 21720 km 2. The maximum altitude of the basin is 4124 m and the minimum (at Bamdej) is 19 m. The Dez dam, which is located to the north-west of Ahvaz city, was brought into operation in 1962. The catchment area of the Dez River above the dam site is 17372 km 2. The associated reservoir is about 60 km in length. The Talezang gauging station, which has provided the data used in this study, is located 10 km upstream of the reservoir inlet. The catchment area above the Talezang gauging station and the ungauged area draining to the reservoir are estimated to be 16132 and 1196 km 2 respectively. Over a period of 32 years, the average discharge of the Dez River at the Talezhang station has been estimated to be 245 m 2 s _1. Figure 1 shows the general location of the river basin and the dam.

220 A. Jahani wit il M i Tin! i itljsl FIG. 1 The Dez River Basin.

Calculating the suspended sediment load of the Dez River 221 THE DATA USED IN THE STUDY The data used in this study can be classified as follows: (a) Suspended sediment concentration data: The data relating to all suspended sediment samples collected at the Talezang gauging station were collated and after quality control 236 samples with their corresponding discharge values were selected. The number of available for individual years ranged between a maximum of 26 and a minimum of six. (b) Discharge data: Daily discharge data were available for a period of 33 years (1954-1987). (c) Reservoir sedimentation surveys: The first reservoir sedimentation survey, which was undertaken at the end of the first decade of operation, provided an estimate of annual sedimentation of 17.5 million tonnes. The second sedimentation survey, which was undertaken at the end of the second decade of operation (1962-1983), provided an estimate of annual sedimentation of 9.5 million tonnes. THE APPROACH The analysis undertaken involved the following stages. (a) The calculation of suspended sediment discharge/flow relationships of the following types: - A single relationship based on all available samples collected during the period 1972-1987 (Fig. 2). - Annual relationships based on the samples collected during each water year (15 relationships). - Monthly relationships based on all of the samples taken in different months during the period of record (12 relationships). - Relationships for separate 5-year periods (3 relationships). DEZ TflLE-ZftNG ALL POINTS 10» \ 10 s CO <D I 10* 10 s "'10 1 10 2 10 3 10< Q m 3 s" 1 FIG. 2 The suspended sediment discharge / flow relationship based on all the samples

222 A. Jahani - Relationships for dry and wet periods (2 relationships). This analysis produced 33 separate relationships. In order to facilitate comparison with the reservoir survey data, the sediment rating relationships were used to estimate sediment loads for three separate periods as follows: - 1962-1987 (25 years), which represents both the period for which daily discharge data are available for the Talezang gauging station after the construction of the dam and the period between the beginning of reservoir operation and the most recent reservoir survey. - 1972-1987 (15 years), which represents the period of sediment sampling used to establish the rating relationships. - 1962-1972 (10 years), which represents the period covered by the first reservoir sediment survey. (b) The annual suspended sediment discharges at Talezang for the above periods were determined using both flow duration curve () data and direct calculation of daily sediment loads using daily flow (DQ) data. The results are presented in Fig. 3. RESULTS The primary purpose of the study reported was to compare the estimates of suspended sediment load obtained using the rating relationships with the equivalent results provided by the reservoir sedimentation surveys, in order to identify the optimum rating relationship estimation procedure. The results provided by the reservoir surveys inevitably involve a degree of error, but they are judged to be sufficiently reliable for the purposes of this study and thus provide an independent source of sediment load data. Calculation Procedure and Rating Relationships Period Duration (years) and al! the all the and dry and wet periods dry and wet periods and five-year -periods live-year -periods and monthly monthly and the year by year curve» the year by year curves 1962-1987 25 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.3-10.8 10.0 Average 8.45 Average 10.4 Ratio = 1.23 1972-1987 15 9.5 9.7 9.6 9.4 9.4 9.3 13.3 12.1 14.7 13.5 Average 9.48 Average 12.7 Ratio = 1.34 1962-1972 10 7.2 7.3 7.2 - - 9.6 8.7 Average 7.25 Average 9.15 Ratio = 1.28 FIG. 3 The mean annual suspended sediment load (t 10 6 ) of the Dez River estimated using different rating relationships and calculation procedures.

Calculating the suspended sediment load of the Dez River 223 The first survey The reservoir survey indicated a mean annual rate of sedimentation during the first decade (1962-1972) of operation of 17.46 million m 3. This value was converted to a mass using measurements of sediment density. The specific weight of sediments above the water level was between 1880 and 2030 kg nr 3 and for submerged sediments between 640 and 1080 kg nr 3. By considering the discharge regime of the Dez River and the reservoir operating rules, it is clear that most of the sediments are permanently submerged. A value of 900 kg nr 3 has been taken as the average specific weight over the 10-year period. The annual rate of sedimentation is therefore equal to 15.7 million tonnes. In order to convert this estimate of reservoir sedimentation to an estimate of the sediment load passing the Talezang gauging station, it is necessary to subtract the sediment input from the catchment area draining directly to the reservoir and from the portion of the basin located between the gauging station and the head of the reservoir. The following equation has been used to derive the correction factor: K= ^ = 0.93 (1) Al +A2 + A3 Where: Al is the catchment area above the Talezang station, A2 is the intermediate catchment area, and A3 is the area draining directly to the reservoir. By applying this correction factor, the mean annual sediment load of the Dez River at Talezang will be equal to 14.6 million tonnes. This represents the total sediment load and, in order to permit direct comparison with the estimates of suspended sediment load obtained using the rating relationships, it is necessary to subtract the bed load component. There are no direct measurements of bed load, but the limited existing information relating to the grain size distribution of the reservoir deposits and the hydrological regime of the river indicate that bed load represents about 15% of the total sediment load. The mean annual suspended sediment load passing Talezang can thus be estimated at 12.4 million tonnes. The second survey The results of this survey indicate that the total volume of sediment deposited in the reservoir during the 21-year period ending in 1983 was 199 million m 3. This value differs substantially from the equivalent value derived from the first survey. However, the results of the second survey have been assumed to be correct and they have been processed in the same way as for the first survey. A specific weight of 1000 kg nr 3 rather than 900 kg nr 3 has, however, been assumed. The results are as follows: - The mean annual sedimentation rate in the reservoir is 9.3 million tonnes. - The mean annual total sediment load passing Talezang is 8.4 million tonnes. - The annual suspended sediment load passing Talezang is 7.5 million tonnes. To assist comparison, the results of the sediment rating curve calculations and the estimates of suspended sediment load based on the reservoir surveys are presented in Fig. 4. COMPARISON OF RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS By comparing the estimates of mean annual suspended sediment load presented in Fig. 3, the following conclusions may be drawn:

224 A. Jahani Second survey First survey T 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 FIG. 4 A comparison of estimates of the suspended sediment load passing Talezang (10 3 tonnes) based on rating relationships and reservoir surveys. (a) The results obtained using flow duration curve data and the continuous series of daily discharge data are similar. (b) The results obtained using the rating relationships developed for all the data, for dry and wet periods and for separate five year periods are essentially similar. (c) The results obtained using the rating relationships for individual months are between 1.23 and 1.34 and on average 1.28 times higher than the loads calculated using the rating relationship based on all the. (d) The loads estimated using the rating relationships established for individual years are higher than those estimated using the other rating relationships. (e) The rating relationships referred to in (b) produce similar results for periods of 25, 15 and 10 years. Differences between the periods reflect variations in discharge between the periods (cf. Table 1 ). (f) The load estimate based on the second reservoir survey (7.5 million tonnes) agrees quite closely with the estimates obtained using the rating curves referred to in (b) above (8.4 million tonnes). The second survey would therefore appear to be more accurate. Differences between the survey result and the rating curve load estimates may reflect errors in the assumed bed load proportion and in other aspects of the survey procedure. TABLE 1 Comparison between the discharge and suspended sediment loads for individual periods. Period (years) 15:25 15: 10 25: 10 Sediment load ratio 1.12 1.3 1.16 Discharge ratio 1.1 1.25 1.13 Based on the results obtained in this study, the use of rating relationships developed using all available samples is recommended. Since new data are being continually gathered, rating relationships and load estimates should be updated every 5 years.