Riemann Hypothesis Proof

Similar documents
Bertrand s postulate Chapter 2

Bernoulli Polynomials Talks given at LSBU, October and November 2015 Tony Forbes

A New Type of q-szász-mirakjan Operators

CHAPTER 10 INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES

MATH 6101 Fall Problems. Problems 11/9/2008. Series and a Famous Unsolved Problem (2-1)(2 + 1) ( 4) 12-Nov-2008 MATH

Harmonic Number Identities Via Euler s Transform

MAT1026 Calculus II Basic Convergence Tests for Series

Binomial transform of products

Math 210A Homework 1

MATH 6101 Fall 2008 Series and a Famous Unsolved Problem

Complex Analysis Spring 2001 Homework I Solution

Arkansas Tech University MATH 2924: Calculus II Dr. Marcel B. Finan

Math 341 Lecture #31 6.5: Power Series

Chapter 6 Infinite Series

x !1! + 1!2!

(A sequence also can be thought of as the list of function values attained for a function f :ℵ X, where f (n) = x n for n 1.) x 1 x N +k x N +4 x 3

Lecture 10: Bounded Linear Operators and Orthogonality in Hilbert Spaces

Jacobi symbols. p 1. Note: The Jacobi symbol does not necessarily distinguish between quadratic residues and nonresidues. That is, we could have ( a

Dirichlet s Theorem on Arithmetic Progressions

Sequences and Series of Functions

sin(n) + 2 cos(2n) n 3/2 3 sin(n) 2cos(2n) n 3/2 a n =

Council for Innovative Research

6.3 Testing Series With Positive Terms

Dupuy Complex Analysis Spring 2016 Homework 02

The Gamma function Michael Taylor. Abstract. This material is excerpted from 18 and Appendix J of [T].

Solutions to Tutorial 5 (Week 6)

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering

MIDTERM 3 CALCULUS 2. Monday, December 3, :15 PM to 6:45 PM. Name PRACTICE EXAM SOLUTIONS

Integrals of Functions of Several Variables

Chapter 8. Euler s Gamma function

Quiz. Use either the RATIO or ROOT TEST to determine whether the series is convergent or not.

n=1 a n is the sequence (s n ) n 1 n=1 a n converges to s. We write a n = s, n=1 n=1 a n

Roger Apéry's proof that zeta(3) is irrational

The Positivity of a Sequence of Numbers and the Riemann Hypothesis

Math 113, Calculus II Winter 2007 Final Exam Solutions

Automated Proofs for Some Stirling Number Identities

A PROOF OF THE THUE-SIEGEL THEOREM ABOUT THE APPROXIMATION OF ALGEBRAIC NUMBERS FOR BINOMIAL EQUATIONS

1 Lecture 2: Sequence, Series and power series (8/14/2012)

INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES

2.4.2 A Theorem About Absolutely Convergent Series

The natural exponential function

The Riemann Zeta Function

Chapter 8. Euler s Gamma function

Statistically Convergent Double Sequence Spaces in 2-Normed Spaces Defined by Orlicz Function

Math 113 Exam 3 Practice

Section 11.6 Absolute and Conditional Convergence, Root and Ratio Tests

The Ratio Test. THEOREM 9.17 Ratio Test Let a n be a series with nonzero terms. 1. a. n converges absolutely if lim. n 1

Some remarks on the paper Some elementary inequalities of G. Bennett

18.S34 (FALL, 2007) GREATEST INTEGER PROBLEMS. n + n + 1 = 4n + 2.

THE ZETA FUNCTION AND THE RIEMANN HYPOTHESIS. Contents 1. History 1

INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES

Chapter 7: The z-transform. Chih-Wei Liu

Gauge Institute Journal, Volume 8, No. 1, February The Delta Function. H. Vic Dannon. September, 2010

In this section, we show how to use the integral test to decide whether a series

lim za n n = z lim a n n.

(s)h(s) = K( s + 8 ) = 5 and one finite zero is located at z 1

Double Derangement Permutations

MATH 312 Midterm I(Spring 2015)

11.5 Alternating Series, Absolute and Conditional Convergence

A PROBABILITY PROBLEM

TERMWISE DERIVATIVES OF COMPLEX FUNCTIONS

62. Power series Definition 16. (Power series) Given a sequence {c n }, the series. c n x n = c 0 + c 1 x + c 2 x 2 + c 3 x 3 +

A new sequence convergent to Euler Mascheroni constant

M17 MAT25-21 HOMEWORK 5 SOLUTIONS

Power series are analytic

On the transcendence of infinite sums of values of rational functions

Product measures, Tonelli s and Fubini s theorems For use in MAT3400/4400, autumn 2014 Nadia S. Larsen. Version of 13 October 2014.

Probability Theory. Exercise Sheet 4. ETH Zurich HS 2017

The Poisson Summation Formula and an Application to Number Theory Jason Payne Math 248- Introduction Harmonic Analysis, February 18, 2010

JANE PROFESSOR WW Prob Lib1 Summer 2000

Infinite Sequences and Series

Notes #3 Sequences Limit Theorems Monotone and Subsequences Bolzano-WeierstraßTheorem Limsup & Liminf of Sequences Cauchy Sequences and Completeness

Introduction to Functional Analysis

Analytic Continuation

Sequences. Notation. Convergence of a Sequence

The Hypergeometric Coupon Collection Problem and its Dual

Chapter 2. Asymptotic Notation

Benaissa Bernoussi Université Abdelmalek Essaadi, ENSAT de Tanger, B.P. 416, Tanger, Morocco

Power series are analytic

THE GREATEST ORDER OF THE DIVISOR FUNCTION WITH INCREASING DIMENSION

1.3 Convergence Theorems of Fourier Series. k k k k. N N k 1. With this in mind, we state (without proof) the convergence of Fourier series.

Integrable Functions. { f n } is called a determining sequence for f. If f is integrable with respect to, then f d does exist as a finite real number

Chapter 3. Strong convergence. 3.1 Definition of almost sure convergence

Alternating Series. 1 n 0 2 n n THEOREM 9.14 Alternating Series Test Let a n > 0. The alternating series. 1 n a n.

Chapter 10: Power Series

Sequences and Limits

LOWER BOUNDS FOR MOMENTS OF ζ (ρ) 1. Introduction

Series with Central Binomial Coefficients, Catalan Numbers, and Harmonic Numbers

We are mainly going to be concerned with power series in x, such as. (x)} converges - that is, lims N n

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.265/15.070J Fall 2013 Lecture 3 9/11/2013. Large deviations Theory. Cramér s Theorem

Ma 4121: Introduction to Lebesgue Integration Solutions to Homework Assignment 5

A GENERALIZED BERNSTEIN APPROXIMATION THEOREM

ECE 901 Lecture 4: Estimation of Lipschitz smooth functions

Subject: Differential Equations & Mathematical Modeling -III. Lesson: Power series solutions of Differential Equations. about ordinary points

Ma 530 Introduction to Power Series

Additional Notes on Power Series

d) If the sequence of partial sums converges to a limit L, we say that the series converges and its

The z-transform. 7.1 Introduction. 7.2 The z-transform Derivation of the z-transform: x[n] = z n LTI system, h[n] z = re j

Convergence of random variables. (telegram style notes) P.J.C. Spreij

5.6 Absolute Convergence and The Ratio and Root Tests

Transcription:

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao vic0@cocast.et March, 009 Revised Deceber, 009 Abstract We show that i 0 < x < ay factor of Riea s fuctio ξ () ust have its ero o the lie / x =. Sice () ξ has i 0 < x < the sae eros as ζ (), this proves Riea s Hypothesis that all the eros of ζ () i 0 < x <, are o / x =. Keywords: Riea Hypothesis, Zeta fuctio, Gaa fuctio, Aalytic fuctios. 000 Matheatics Subject Classificatio:M6, 33E0, 30A0, 6D5, 30D0. Itroductio I his 859 Zeta paper, Riea obtaied a forula for the cout of the pries up to a give uber. Riea s forula has four ters. But oly the first ad the third ters have o-egligible values. The first is the doiat ter, ad ca be coputed precisely. The third is saller ad depeds o the provisio that all the eros of the Zeta fuctio i 0 < x < are o the lie x = /. This provisio becae kow as the Riea Hypothesis, but it was ever hypothesied by Riea, or was it used by hi. Not seeig a easy proof for it, Riea used oly the first ter of his forula ad obtaied a approxiatio far superior to Gauss for the cout of the pries.

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. I 935, ad 936, Titcharsh ad Corie [Hasel, p. xii] cofired by coputatios that the first 04 eros of Zeta i 0 < x < with 0 < I < 468 lie exactly o the lie x = /. Followig that, Tourig (953) exteded the upper liit to I = 540, ad Leher (956) cofired that the first 5,000 eros of Zeta i 0 < x < with 0 < I <, 944 lie o the lie x = /. By 00, the first 50 billio Zeta eros have bee located o the lie x = /, ad i a 008 eetig a far greater uber was etioed. The fact that the first 50 billio eros are o x = /, does ot costitute a proof for the ifiitely ay eros i the ifiite area of the strip 0 < x <. But expectig assive edless coputatios to disprove the Riea Hypothesis by fidig a ero off the lie x = /, is statistically iplausible. I fact, statistical tests idicate that the Riea Hypothesis holds with extreely high statistical certaity. I 008, we applied a Chi-Squared Goodess-of-Fit-Test to the Riea forula for the cout of the pries, ad cofired that the Riea Hypothesis holds with certaity that is liited oly by the software [Da]. I sectios to 4, we preset Riea s fuctio ξ (), ad kow facts about its eros. I sectio 5, we recall that ξ( x iy) = ξ( x + iy). This fact serves as a key result for the proof. I sectios 6-8, we recall the d key result that is due to Hadaard. The proof of this well-kow result, is i the Appedix. The 3 rd key result due to Titcharsh, is preseted i sectio 9.

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. There, we prove that i 0 < x <, ay factor of () the lie x = /. ξ ust have its ero o Sice ξ () has i 0 < x < the sae eros as ζ (), this proves that all the eros of ζ () i 0 < x <, are o x = /.. ξ (), ad () ζ have the sae eros i 0 < x < For x + iy =, Riea gave the Defiitio () Γ( )() ζ π. ξ ( ) Sice Γ () has o eros i 0 < x <, [Saks], we have the Propositio. ξ () has i 0 < x < the sae eros as ζ (). () ξ has i 0 < x <, ifiitely ay eros that are sequeced by sie ad icrease to. Sice ζ () has ifiitely ay eros i 0 < x < [Titch], we have the Propositio. ξ () has ifiitely ay eros,, 3,... i 0 < x <. Also, ξ () is a etire fuctio, ot idetically ero. Thus, by [Saks, p. 96] we have the Propositio. The eros,, 3,..., are sequeced by sie, ad icrease to. 3.... 3

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. 3. the ultiplicity of each ero of ξ () is fiite Sice a aalytic fuctio that vaishes o a covergig sequece is idetically ero, there is o ifiite sequece of idetical ξ () eros. That is, we have the Propositio 3. The ultiplicity of each ero of ξ () is fiite. 4. Diagoally syetric eros of ξ () For ζ (), Riea derived the fuctioal equatio ξ() = ξ( ). Therefore, we have the Propositio 4. If = x + iy is a ero of ξ (), the so is = x iy. These two eros are diagoally syetric with respect to =, because deotig x = + α, we have x = α. 5. Observig ξ( x iy) = ξ( x + iy), for 0 < x <, Proof: Riea obtaied a itegral forula for ξ (), t = t = ( ( + ) ) ξ( ) = + ( ) ψ( t) t + t dt, where the ifiite series ψ( t) + + +..., πt e πt 3 πt e e coverges uiforly for t. Therefore, t = t = ( ( + ) ) ξ( ) = + ( ) ψ( t) t + t dt 4

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. t = t = ( ( + ) ) = + ( ) ψ( t) t + t dt That is, we have = ξ() = ξ(). ξ( x iy) = ξ( x + iy). 6. A coverget ifiite product is ero if ad oly if at least oe of its factors is ero Aalytic fuctios are effectively represeted as ifiite products [Saks, VII]. By the defiitio i [Saks, p. 86], The Ifiite Product 0, so that all the ters after it a0+ a0+... a 0 0+ q. Cosequetly, p = aa... a q. 0 aaa 3... coverges to p if ad oly if there is a idex a, a, a,... Therefore, [Saks, p. 8], has the Propositio 3 + + + are o-ero, ad 0 0 0 6. The value of a coverget ifiite product is equal to ero if ad oly if at least oe of its factors is ero. The product of a = that has o such q, diverges to ero, although it satisfies the covergece ecessary coditio a [Saks, p. 8]. If a coverget ifiite product equals ero, this is due to oly fiitely ay vaishig factors, without which, the reaiig ifiite product is o-ero.. Absolutely Coverget Ifiite Product 5

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. ( + u )( + u )... coverges if ad oly if u + u +... coverges. Here, we ll eed Absolute Covergece, so that the ifiite products will coverge idepedetly of the order of their factors. By the defiitio i [Saks, p. 88], ( + u )( + u )... coverges absolutely if ad oly if( + u )( + u )... coverges. Therefore, [Saks, p. 89] has the Propositio. ( + u)( + u)... coverges absolutely u + u +... coverges. Cosequetly, sice the value of a absolutely covergece series does ot deped o the order of the suatio, we have Propositio. The value of a absolutely coverget ifiite product does ot deped o the order of its factors. 8. The Hadaard factoriatio of ξ () Hadaard factoriatio for ξ () is the d key result for the Hypothesis proof. Due to Hadaard, we have Propositio 8. ξ() =..., where the product coverges absolutely, ad uiforly with respect to the s, ' its value does ot deped o the order of its factors, ad it vaishes oly at the eros of ξ ().,,,,,,... do ot appear i the The cojugate roots, 3 3 factoriatio of ξ (). A proof of this well-kow result, is i the Appedix. We ote here that the do ot appear i the factoriatio, because that will require the iclusio 6

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. of the factors. These factors are ot differetiable with respect to, ad icludig the will ake ξ () ot differetiable with respect to. We tur to prove the Hypothesis 9. x =, for ay ero Proof: To keep it readable, we ll take =, ad assue that has ultiplicity. Say, = 8, ad 6 < = 8 < 9 Sice = x + iy is a ero of ξ, By 5, Thus, ξ ( x + iy ) = 0. ξ( x iy ) = 0. ξ( x iy ) = 0. Applyig 8. to ξ( x iy), x iy x iy x iy x iy 0 =... Sice we assued = 8, we have x iy x iy x iy x iy 0... = 6 6 x iy x iy x iy x iy... 9 9 Clearly, for, 8, the factors with are all o-ero. Ideed, x iy = 0 =, which cotradicts 8..

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. Ad, x iy = 0 = x iy =, which cotradicts 8.. Sice all the factors with are o-ero, by 6., we ust have Thus, Hece, xiy xiy ( ) ( ) = 0. x iy x iy 0 =. 4 y x + x iy x iy = 0. That is, 4y x + ( ) + x y x y = 0 Now, the three factors that iclude To see that, ote the 3 rd Titcharsh, [Titch, p.39-33], y are o-vaishig. key result for the Hypothesis Proof, due to i 0 < x <, ad 0 y y, ζ () has oly oe ero o the lie x = /, at y = 4.3453, Thus, y ust be out of the Titcharsh rectagle. That is, y y, ad ay of the factors with Therefore, we have That is, x = 0. x =. y is greater tha y > 96. 8

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. Replacig with, ad with k, we coclude that if is a ero of ultiplicity k, the we ll apply the arguets above to obtai that x =. APPENDIX: Proof of Hadaard Factoriatio 8. A. The Weierstrass Factoriatio of ξ () Due to Weierstrass, ξ () has a ifiite product represetatio A. h ( ) Q ( ) ( )( ), = ξ() = e e where the polyoials Q () guaratee the uifor covergece of the product i the ope plae, where h () is a etire fuctio. ad where,, 3,... are the eros of ξ () i 0 < x <, that are sequeced by sie, icrease to, ad do ot iclude,,.... This represetatio is well kow. We detail the proof i [Ed]. Proof: By., the eros of ξ () i 0 < x <,,, 3,..., are sequeced by sie, ad icrease to. 3.... Sice ξ () is a etire fuctio so that ξ(0) 0, ad sice the ' s are sequeced by their sie ad icrease to, by Weierstrass [Saks,VII,.3], we have h ( ) Q ( ) ( ) e, = ξ() = e where the polyoials Q () guaratee the uifor covergece of the 9

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. product i the ope plae, ad where h () is a etire fuctio. The eros of 4. appear i the factoriatio, ad we have h ( ) Q ( ) ( )( ). = ξ() = e e The appearace of the eros of 5, will require the iclusio of the factors. These factors are ot differetiable with respect to, ad icludig the i the product will ake ξ () ot differetiable. Hadaard showed that for ξ () ad Q ( ) e =, h ( ) e =. Thus, siplifyig the Weierstrass product represetatio of ξ (). I B we derive Hadaard s first siplificatio, ad i D we derive the secod. B. Q ( ) e = To establish Q ( ) e =, we ai to show that for all i 0 < x <, ( ) = ( ) coverges absolutely. = By., we eed to show that ( ) coverges. ( ) For istace, cos( π) = ( ) coverges absolutely, because = 0

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. coverges. ( ) = Note that, ( ) ( ) 4 = iy 4 = ( x + ) 4 = ( x ) y + i( x ) y ( ) 4 = ( x ) y + 4( x ) y 4 4 6 = ( x ) + y + ( x ) + y + ( x ) y ( ) 6 = ( x ) + y + ( x ) + y 4 ( 6 ) = + x + y Now, x 6 y ( ) + > 0, because x, ad by a result of Titcharsh (that we state i sectio 3), y y > 4. Therefore, Hece, ( ) >. < ( ), ad it is sufficiet to show that <. > N

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. Note that the ecessary coditio, To show the covergece, for large eough, 0 = N, N +, N +,...,, holds, sice. defie positive ubers R > so that The, ad >, 4 R log R =. log >. Hadaard showed [Da3, 0.3], that the uber of eros of ξ () i R is bouded by R log R. Sice we took 4 R log R Therefore, =, we have > R. > N N R > = 4 (log ) R > N 4 > N ( log ) ( log ) = 4. 3/ / > N

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. log Sice ( ) ad Therefore, ad / 0, as, we have ( log ) / > N >, <, for N <. = coverges absolutely, Q ( ) e =. Sice the Weierstrass product coverges uiforly, we have h ( ) ξ() = e ( )( ), = where the ifiite product coverges absolutely, ad uiforly with respect to the s. ' C. The order of a etire fuctio By [Holl, p. 68], the Hadaard Factoriatio Theore applies to a etire fuctio f () for which li sup log log ax ( ) f R = R <. is called the order of f (). For istace, if f () cos( π) =, 3

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. iπ iπ cos( π) = e + e ( iπ iπ e e ) + iπ( x+ iy) iπ( x+ iy) ( e e ) = + ( πy πy e e ) = + e πy Thus, e π. log log ax cos( π) log log ax log R = R = R e π = = log log log( πr) R e π Hece, f () = cos( π) has order = = (log π + log R ) log π = +, as R.. h ( ) D. e =. Hadaard showed that for () h ( ) ξ, e =. Hadaard replaced Weierstrass etire fuctio 4

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. with a polyoial so that h (), Q (), deg Q ( ). It is well-kow ([Ed] or [Da3, 0.]), that if R is large eough, log ξ( ) R i R. Hece, Sice by L'Hospital we coclude log log ax ξ( ) log R = R li R log ( ) log = +. log RR li R R = = 0, li sup log log ax ξ( ) =. = R R That is, Hece, That is ξ () is of order = deg Q ( ).. Q () = A+ B ( ), for soe costats A, ad B. Sice the factoriatio factors are we have, 4 4 ( ) ( ) = =, ( ) ( ) ( )( ) 5

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. ξ() = e, where the product is a eve fuctio of But Riea showed [Da3, 9.] that is a eve fuctio of ( ). Cosequetly, ad Settig = 0, 0 A+ B( ) ( ) 4 ( ) 4. 4 ( ) A ( ) ξ( ) = A + A + +... B = 0, ( ) A ξ() = e ( ). A e = ξ(0). By Riea s Itegral forula for ξ (), that we used i 5, Hece, we have Therefore, t = t = 4 4 ( ( + ) ) ξ( ) = + ( ) ψ( t) t + t dt. ξ (0) =. ( ) ξ() = ( ) 4 4. = where the ifiite product coverges absolutely, ad uiforly with respect to the s. ' 6

Riea Hypothesis Proof H. Vic Dao 43 rd West Coast Nuber Theory Coferece, Dec 6-0, 009, Asiloar, CA. Revised 0/8/00. Refereces [Da] Dao, Vic, Riea s Zeta paper: The Product Forula Error, Gauge Istitute Joural of Math ad Physics, May 006. [Da] Dao, Vic, Chi-Squared Goodess-of-Fit-Test of the Riea Hypothesis, Gauge Istitute Joural of Math ad Physics, August 008. [Da3] Dao, Vic, Riea s Zeta Fuctio: the Riea Hypothesis Origi, the Factoriatio Error, ad the Cout of the Pries, Gauge Istitute Joural of Math ad Physics, Noveber 009. [Ed]. Edwards, H. M. Riea s Zeta Fuctio, Acadeic Press, 94. [Hada] Hadaard, J., Etude sur les Proprietes des foctios Etieres et e particulier d'ue foctio cosideree par Riea J. Math. Pures Appl. [4] 9, 893, pp. -5. Also, i [Ed, chapter ] [Hasel] Haselgrove C. B. ad Miller J.C.P., Tables of the Riea Zeta Fuctio, Cabridge Uiversity Press 960. [Holl] Hollad, A. S. B., Itroductio to the Theory of Etire Fuctios, Acadeic Press, 93. [Rie]. Riea, B., O the Nuber of Prie Nubers less tha a give quatity, 859, i God Created the Itegers: The Matheatical Breakthroughs that chaged History, edited by Stephe Hawkig, Ruig Press, 005. Page 86. Riea s paper was traslated also by H. M. Edwards, i Appedix to [Ed]. Ad by Roger Baker, Charles Christeso, ad Hery Orde, I Collected Papers, Berhard Riea, Kedrick Press, 004. [Saks]. S. Saks, ad A. Zygud, Aalytic Fuctios. Secod Editio, Polish Scietific Publishers, 965. [Titch]. Titcharsh, E. C., The Theory of the Riea Zeta Fuctio. Oxford U. Press, 95. Soe web sources, http://pries.ut.edu/otes/rh.htl http://www.clayath.org/illeiu/riea_hypothesis/