Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-1

Similar documents
LECTURE 380 TWO-STAGE OPEN-LOOP COMPARATORS - II (READING: AH ) Trip Point of an Inverter

V in (min) and V in (min) = (V OH -V OL ) dv out (0) dt = A p 1 V in = = 10 6 = 1V/µs

ECE 6412, Spring Final Exam Page 1

Errata of CMOS Analog Circuit Design 2 nd Edition By Phillip E. Allen and Douglas R. Holberg

ECE 6412, Spring Final Exam Page 1 FINAL EXAMINATION NAME SCORE /120

Errata of CMOS Analog Circuit Design 2 nd Edition By Phillip E. Allen and Douglas R. Holberg

Lecture 320 Improved Open-Loop Comparators and Latches (3/28/10) Page 320-1

Lecture 140 Simple Op Amps (2/11/02) Page 140-1

ECE-343 Test 2: Mar 21, :00-8:00, Closed Book. Name : SOLUTION

CHAPTER 6 CMOS OPERATIONAL AMPLIFIERS

DESIGN MICROELECTRONICS ELCT 703 (W17) LECTURE 3: OP-AMP CMOS CIRCUIT. Dr. Eman Azab Assistant Professor Office: C

MOSFET and CMOS Gate. Copy Right by Wentai Liu

ECE 342 Solid State Devices & Circuits 4. CMOS

THE INVERTER. Inverter

Lecture 13 MOSFET as an amplifier with an introduction to MOSFET small-signal model and small-signal schematics. Lena Peterson

Systematic Design of Operational Amplifiers

Lecture 150 Simple BJT Op Amps (1/28/04) Page 150-1

Lecture 11 VTCs and Delay. No lab today, Mon., Tues. Labs restart next week. Midterm #1 Tues. Oct. 7 th, 6:30-8:00pm in 105 Northgate

ECE 438: Digital Integrated Circuits Assignment #4 Solution The Inverter

Lecture 37: Frequency response. Context

Step 1. Finding V M. Goal: Þnd V M = input voltage for the output = V M both transistors are saturated at V IN = V M since

EEE 421 VLSI Circuits

Lecture 5: DC & Transient Response

1/13/12 V DS. I d V GS. C ox ( = f (V GS ,V DS ,V SB = I D. + i d + I ΔV + I ΔV BS V BS. 19 January 2012

3. Basic building blocks. Analog Design for CMOS VLSI Systems Franco Maloberti

CMPEN 411 VLSI Digital Circuits. Lecture 04: CMOS Inverter (static view)

DC and Transient Responses (i.e. delay) (some comments on power too!)

Lecture 12 Digital Circuits (II) MOS INVERTER CIRCUITS

Announcements. EE141- Fall 2002 Lecture 7. MOS Capacitances Inverter Delay Power

EE 466/586 VLSI Design. Partha Pande School of EECS Washington State University

EE115C Digital Electronic Circuits Homework #4

Advanced Current Mirrors and Opamps

Studio 9 Review Operational Amplifier Stability Compensation Miller Effect Phase Margin Unity Gain Frequency Slew Rate Limiting Reading: Text sec 5.

ECE 546 Lecture 10 MOS Transistors

CMOS Inverter (static view)

Lecture 6: DC & Transient Response

EECS 141: FALL 05 MIDTERM 1

EECS 105: FALL 06 FINAL

MICROELECTRONIC CIRCUIT DESIGN Second Edition

6.2 INTRODUCTION TO OP AMPS

The CMOS Inverter: A First Glance

Lecture 400 Discrete-Time Comparators (4/8/02) Page 400-1

Lecture 4: DC & Transient Response

ECE-343 Test 1: Feb 10, :00-8:00pm, Closed Book. Name : SOLUTION

Lecture 12 Circuits numériques (II)

Lecture 340 Characterization of DACs and Current Scaling DACs (5/1/10) Page 340-1

CHAPTER 15 CMOS DIGITAL LOGIC CIRCUITS

ECE 342 Electronic Circuits. Lecture 35 CMOS Delay Model

EE247 Lecture 16. Serial Charge Redistribution DAC

Lecture 13 - Digital Circuits (II) MOS Inverter Circuits. March 20, 2003

Digital Integrated Circuits

4.10 The CMOS Digital Logic Inverter

ECE-342 Test 3: Nov 30, :00-8:00, Closed Book. Name : Solution

ENGR890 Digital VLSI Design Fall Lecture 4: CMOS Inverter (static view)

Homework Assignment 08

DC and Transient. Courtesy of Dr. Daehyun Dr. Dr. Shmuel and Dr.

ECE 546 Lecture 11 MOS Amplifiers

Final Exam. 55:041 Electronic Circuits. The University of Iowa. Fall 2013.

Amplifiers, Source followers & Cascodes

Lecture 14 - Digital Circuits (III) CMOS. April 1, 2003

E40M. Op Amps. M. Horowitz, J. Plummer, R. Howe 1

Lecture 4: Feedback and Op-Amps

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

PRACTICE PROBLEMS FOR CMOS ANALOG CIRCUIT DESIGN, 2 ND EDITION

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

DC & Transient Responses

2007 Fall: Electronic Circuits 2 CHAPTER 10. Deog-Kyoon Jeong School of Electrical Engineering

University of Toronto. Final Exam

Biasing the CE Amplifier

ESE 570 MOS INVERTERS STATIC (DC Steady State) CHARACTERISTICS. Kenneth R. Laker, University of Pennsylvania, updated 12Feb15

EXAMPLE DESIGN PART 2

EEC 118 Lecture #5: CMOS Inverter AC Characteristics. Rajeevan Amirtharajah University of California, Davis Jeff Parkhurst Intel Corporation

Microelectronics Main CMOS design rules & basic circuits

Bandwidth of op amps. R 1 R 2 1 k! 250 k!

MOS Transistor Theory

EE5311- Digital IC Design

CMOS INVERTER. Last Lecture. Metrics for qualifying digital circuits. »Cost» Reliability» Speed (delay)»performance

CMOS Comparators. Kyungpook National University. Integrated Systems Lab, Kyungpook National University. Comparators

EE5311- Digital IC Design

EXAMPLE DESIGN PART 2

Midterm. ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals. Lecture Outline. Pass Transistor Logic. Restore Output.

Lecture 5: DC & Transient Response

Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola 1

Digital Integrated Circuits 2nd Inverter

EE5780 Advanced VLSI CAD

Power Dissipation. Where Does Power Go in CMOS?

Integrated Circuits & Systems

EE105 Fall 2014 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits. NMOS Transistor Capacitances: Saturation Region

Sample-and-Holds David Johns and Ken Martin University of Toronto

The CMOS Inverter: A First Glance

Assignment 3 ELEC 312/Winter 12 R.Raut, Ph.D.

EE 434 Lecture 33. Logic Design

EEC 118 Lecture #6: CMOS Logic. Rajeevan Amirtharajah University of California, Davis Jeff Parkhurst Intel Corporation

INTEGRATED CIRCUITS. 74ALS11A Triple 3-Input AND gate. Product specification 1991 Feb 08 IC05 Data Handbook

High-to-Low Propagation Delay t PHL

ECE 523/421 - Analog Electronics University of New Mexico Solutions Homework 3

Chapter 13 Small-Signal Modeling and Linear Amplification

5.0 CMOS Inverter. W.Kucewicz VLSICirciuit Design 1

Modeling All-MOS Log-Domain Σ A/D Converters

Transcription:

Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-1 LECTURE 310 OPEN-LOOP COMPARATORS LECTURE ORGANIZATION Outline Characterization of comparators Dominant pole, open-loop comparators Two-pole, open-loop comparators Summary CMOS Analog Circuit Design, 2 nd Edition Reference Pages 439-461 Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-2 CHARACTERIZATION OF COMPARATORS What is a Comparator? The comparator is a circuit that compares one analog signal with another analog signal or a reference voltage and outputs a binary signal based on the comparison. The comparator is basically a 1-bit analog-to-digital converter: Analog Input Reference Voltage 1-Bit Quantizer 1-Bit ADC 1-Bit Encoder 1-Bit Digital Output Analog Input 1 Analog Input 2 Comparator 1-Bit Quantizer 1-Bit Encoder 060808-01 Comparator symbol: v P v N - v O Fig. 8.1-1

Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-3 Noninverting and Inverting Comparators The comparator output is binary with the two-level outputs defined as, V OH = the high output of the comparator V OL = the low level output of the comparator Voltage transfer function of a Noninverting and Inverting Comparator: v o V OH V OH v o V OL Noninverting Comparator v P -v N V OL v P -v N Inverting Comparator Fig. 8.1-2A Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-4 Infinite Gain Comparator Voltage transfer function curve: v o V OH v P -v N V OL Fig. 8.1-2 Model: v P v N v P -v N f 0 (v P -v N ) v O - - Comparator V OH for (v P -v N ) > 0 f 0 (v P -v N ) = V OL for (v P -v N ) < 0 Fig. 8.1-3 Gain = Av = lim VOH-VOL V0 V where V is the input voltage change

Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-5 Finite Gain Comparator Voltage transfer curve: v o V OH V IL V IH v P -v N V OL Fig. 8.1-4 where for a noninverting comparator, V IH = smallest input voltage at which the output voltage is V OH V IL = largest input voltage at which the output voltage is V OL Model: v P v N f 1 (v P -v N ) = v P -v N f 1 (v P -v N ) v O - - Comparator V OH for (v P -v N ) > V IH A v (v P- v N ) for V IL < (v P -v N )<V IH V OL for (v P -v N ) < V IL Fig. 8.1-5 The voltage gain is A v = V OHV OL V IH V IL Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-6 Input Offset Voltage of a Comparator Voltage transfer curve: v o V OS V OH V IL V IH v P -v N V OL Fig. 8.1-6 V OS = the input voltage necessary to make the output equal V OHV OL 2 when v P = v N. Model: v P v P ' ±V OS v P'-v N' f 1 (v P '-v N ') v O - - v N v N ' Comparator Fig. 8.1-7 Other aspects of the model: ICMR = input common mode voltage range (all transistors remain in saturation) R in = input differential resistance R icm = common mode input resistance

Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-7 Comparator Noise Noise of a comparator is modeled as if the comparator were biased in the transition region. v o Rms Noise V OH v P -v N V OL Transition Uncertainty Fig. 8.1-8 Noise leads to an uncertainty in the transition region causing jitter or phase noise. Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-8 Input Common Mode Range Because the input is analog and normally differential, the input common mode range of the comparator is also important. Input common mode range (ICMR): ICMR = the voltage range over which the input common-mode signal can vary without influence the differential performance As we have seen before, the ICMR is defined by the common-mode voltage range over which all MOSFETs remain in the saturation region.

Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-9 Propagation Delay Time Rising propagation delay time: v o V OH v o = V OHV OL 2 t V OL v i = v P -v N V IH V IL t pr v i = V IHV IL 2 t pf t 070509-01 Propagation delay time = RisingpropagationdelaytimeFallingpropagationdelaytime 2 = t prt pf 2 Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-10 Linear Frequency Response Dominant Single-Pole Model: A v (s) = A v(0) s = A v(0) s c 1 c 1 where A v (0) = dc voltage gain of the comparator c = 1 c = -3dB frequency of the comparator or the magnitude of the pole Step Response: v o (t) = A v (0) [1 - e-t/c]v in where V in = the magnitude of the step input. Maximum slope of the step response: dv o (t) dt = A v(0) c e -t/ cv in The maximum slope occurs at t = 0 giving, dv o (t) dt t=0 = A v(0) c V in

Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-11 Propagation Time Delay The rising propagation time delay for a single-pole comparator is: V OH -V OL 1 2 = A v (0) [1 - e-t p /c]v in t p = c ln 1- V OH-V OL 2A v (0)V in Define the minimum input voltage to the comparator as, V in (min) = V OH-V OL 1 A v (0) t p = c ln 1- V in(min) 2V in Define k as the ratio, V in, to the minimum input voltage, V in (min), V in k = V in (min) t p = c ln 2k 2k-1 Thus, if k = 1, t p = 0.693c. Illustration: v out V in > V in (min) V Obviously, the more overdrive OH v applied to the input, the smaller in v out V OH V OL the propagation delay time. - 2 V V OL in = V in (min) 0 t 0 t p t p (max) Fig. 8.1-10 Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-12 Dynamic Characteristics - Slew Rate of a Comparator If the rate of rise or fall of a comparator becomes large, the dynamics may be limited by the slew rate. Slew rate comes from the relationship, i = C dv dt where i is the current through a capacitor and v is the voltage across it. If the current becomes limited, then the voltage rate becomes limited. Therefore for a comparator that is slew rate limited we have, t p = T = V SR = V OH-V OL 2 SR where SR = slew rate of the comparator. If SR < maximum slope, then the comparator is slewing.

Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-13 Example 310-1 - Propagation Delay Time of a Comparator Find the propagation delay time of an open loop comparator that has a dominant pole at 10 3 radians/sec, a dc gain of 10 4, a slew rate of 1V/μs, and a binary output voltage swing of 1V. Assume the applied input voltage is 10mV. Solution The input resolution for this comparator is 1V/10 4 or 0.1mV. Therefore, the 10mV input is 100 times larger than v in (min) giving a k of 100. Therefore, we get t p = 1 10 3 ln 2 100 2 100-1 = 10-3 ln 200 199 = 5.01μs For slew rate considerations, we get Maximum slope = 104 10-3 10mV = 10 5 V/sec. = 0.1V/μs. Therefore, the propagation delay time for this case is limited by the linear response and is 5.01μs. Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-14 DOMINANT POLE, OPEN-LOOP COMPARATORS Dominant Pole Comparators Any of the self-compensated op amps provide a straight-forward implementation of an open loop comparator without any modification. The previous characterization gives the relationships for: 1.) The static characteristics Gain Input offset Noise 2.) The dynamic characteristics Linear frequency response Slew rate response

Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-15 Single-Stage Dominant Pole Comparator M3 V DD M4 V PBias2 MC3 MC4 v o v p MC1 M1 - C L MC2 M2 v V n Bias M5 V NBias1 - Gain g 2 m r 2 ds Slew rate = I 5 /C L Dominant pole = -1/(R out C L ) = -1/(g m r 2 ds C L ) 060808-02 Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-16 Folded-Cascode Comparator V DD V PB1 M4 M5 V PB2 v P vn M1 M2 M8 M6 M7 V NB2 M9 v OUT C L V NB1 M3 I3 M10 M11 Gain g 2 m r 2 ds Slew rate = I 3 /C L Dominant pole = -1/(R out C L ) -1/(g m r 2 ds C L ) Slightly improved ICMR 060808-03

Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-17 Enhanced-Gain, Folded-Cascode Comparator V DD M10 V PB1 M3 v P -A M8 v N M1 M2 M6 -A -A M11 M9 v OUT M7 C L V NB1 M4 M5 Gain g m1 R out R out [Ar ds7 g m7 (r ds1 r ds5 )] (Ar ds9 g m9 r ds11 ) Slew rate = I 3 /C L Dominant pole = -1/(R out C L ) 060808-04 Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-18 TWO-POLE, OPEN-LOOP COMPARATORS Two-Stage Comparator The two-stage op amp without compensation is an excellent implementation of a high-gain, open-loop comparator. V DD M3 M4 M6 v n v p M1 M2 V NB1 - M5 M7 v out C L 060808-05 Much faster linear response the two poles of the comparator are typically much larger than the dominant pole of the self-compensated type of comparator. Be careful not to close the loop because the amplifier is uncompensated. Slew rate: SR- = I 7 C II and SR = I 6-I7 CII

Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-19 Performance of the Two-Stage, Open-Loop Comparator We know the performance should be similar to the uncompensated two-stage op amp. Emphasis on comparator performance: Maximum output voltage V OH = V DD - (V DD -V G6 (min)- V TP ) 8I 7 1-1- 6 (V DD -V G6 (min)- V TP ) 2 Minimum output voltage V OL = V SS Small-signal voltage gain Av(0) = g m1 g m6 g ds2 g ds4 g ds6 g ds7 Poles Input: Output: p 1 = -(g ds2g ds4 ) C I p 2 = -(g ds6g ds7 ) C II Frequency response Av(0) Av(s) = s p1-1 s p2-1 Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-20 Example 310-1 - Performance of a Two-Stage Comparator Evaluate V OH, V OL, A v (0), V in (min), p 1, p 2, for the two-stage comparator shown. The large signal model parameters are K N = 110μA/V 2, K P = 50μA/V 2, V TN = V TP = 0.7V, N = 0.04V -1 and P = 0.05V -1. Assume that the minimum value of V G6 = 0V and that C I = 0.2pF and C II = 5pF. Solution Using the above relations, we find that V OH = 2.5 - (2.5-0-0.7) 1-1- 8 234x10-6 = 2.2V 50x10-6 38(2.5-0-0.7)2 V OL is -2.5V. The gain can be found as A v (0) = 7696. Therefore, the input resolution is V in (min) = (V OH -V OL /A v (0) = 4.7V/7,696 = 0.611mV Next, we find the poles of the comparator, p 1 and p 2. p 1 = -(g ds2 g ds4 )/C I = 15x10-6 (0.040.05)/0.2x10-12 = -6.75x10 6 (1.074MHz) and p 2 = -(g ds6 g ds7 )/C II ) =(95x10-6 )(0.040.05)/5x10-12 = -1.71x10 6 (0.272MHz) 30µA 4.5µm 1µm - v in M8 15µm 1µm M1 M3 3µm 1µm M5 V DD = 2.5V M4 15µm 1µm 3µm 1µm 30µA 4.5µm 1µm M2 V SS = -2.5V C I = 0.2pF M6 95µA M7 94µm 1µm 14µm 1µm v out C II = 5p 070509-02

Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-21 Linear Step Response of the Two-Stage Comparator The step response of a circuit with two real poles (p 1 p 2 ) is, v out (t) = A v (0)V in 1 p 2e tp 1 Normalizing gives, p 1 -p - p 1e tp 2 2 p 1 -p 2 v out (t n ) = v out(t) A v (0)V in = 1 - m m-1 e-t n 1 m-1 e-mt n where m = p 2 p 1 1 and t n = -tp 1 If p 1 = p 2 (m =1), then Normalized Output Voltage 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 m = 4 m = 2 v out (t n ) = 1 - e tp 1 tp 1 e tp 1 = 1 - e -t n - t n e -t n m = 1 m = 0.5 m = p 2 p 1 m = 0.25 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 Normalized Time (t n = -tp1 ) Fig. 8.2-2 Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-22 Linear Step Response of the Two-Stage Comparator - Continued The above results are valid as long as the slope of the linear response does not exceed the slew rate. Slope at t = 0 is zero Maximum slope occurs at (m 1) t n (max) = ln(m) m-1 and is dv out (t n (max)) dt n = m m-1 exp -ln(m) m-1 -exp -m ln(m) m-1 For the two-stage comparator using NMOS input transistors, the slew rate is SR- = I 7 C II SR = I 6-I7 CII = 0.5 6(VDD-VG6(min)- VTP )2-I7 CII

Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-23 Example 310-2 - Step Response of Ex. 310-1 Find the maximum slope of Ex. 310-1 and the time it occurs if the magnitude of the input step is v in (min). If the dc bias current in M7 is 100μA, at what value of load capacitance, C L would the transient response become slew limited? If the magnitude of the input step is 100v in (min), what is the new value of C L at which slewing would occur? Solution The poles of the comparator were given in Ex. 310-1 as p 1 = -6.75x106 rads/sec. and p 2 = -1.71x10 6 rads/sec. This gives a value of m = 0.253. From the previous expressions, the maximum slope occurs at t n (max) = 1.84 secs. Dividing by p 1 gives t(max) = 0.272μs. The slope of the transient response at this time is found as dv out (t n (max)) dt n = -0.338[exp(-1.84) - exp(-0.253 1.84)] = 0.159 V/sec Multiplying the above by p 1 gives dv out (t(max))/dt = 1.072V/μs. If the slew rate is less than 1.072V/μs, the transient response will experience slewing. Therefore, if C L 100μA/1.072V/μs or 93.3pF, the comparator will slew. If the input is 100v in (min), then we must unnormalize the output slope as follows. dv out (t(max)) v in dt = dv out (t(max)) v in (min) dt = 100 1.072V/μs = 107.2V/μs Therefore, the comparator will slew with a load capacitance greater than 0.933pF. Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-24 Propagation Delay Time (Non-Slew) To find t p, we want to set 0.5(V OH -V OL ) equal to v out (t n ). However, v out (t n ) given as v out (t n ) = A v (0)V in 1- m m-1 e-t n 1 m-1 e-mt n can t be easily solved so approximate the step response as a power series to get v out (t n ) A v (0)V in 1- m m-1 1-t n t n 2 2 Therefore, set v out (t n ) = 0.5(V OH -V OL ) V OH -V OL 2 mt pn 2 A v (0)V in 2 or V OH -V OL V in (min) 1 t pn ma v (0)V in = mv in = mk This approximation is particularly good for large values of k. 1 m-1 1-mt n m2 t 2 n 2 mt n 2 A v (0)V in 2

Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-25 Example 310-3 - Propagation Delay Time of a Two-Pole Comparator (Non-Slew) Find the propagation time delay of Ex. 310-1 if V in = 10mV, 100mV and 1V. Solution From Ex. 310-1 we know that Vin(min) = 0.611mV and m = 0.253. For Vin = 10mV, k = 16.366 which gives tpn 0.491. The propagation time delay is equal to 0.491/6.75x106 or 72.9nS. This corresponds well with the figure shown where the normalized propagation time delay is the time at which the amplitude is 1/2k or 0.031 which corresponds to tpn of approximately 0.5. Similarly, for Vin = 100mV and 1V we get a propagation time delay of 23ns and 7.3ns, respectively. Normalized Output Voltage 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 m = 4 m = 2 m = 1 m = 0.5 m = p 2 p 1 m = 0.25 1 = 0.031 2k 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 0.52 Normalized Time (t n = tp1 = t/τ 1 ) tp = 0.52 6.75x10 6 = 77ns Fig. 8.2-2A Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-26 Initial Operating States for the Two-Stage, Open-Loop Comparator What are the initial operating states for the two-stage, open-loop comparator? The following table summarizes the results for the two-stage, open-loop comparator shown. Conditions Initial State of vo1 Initial State of vout v G1 >V G2, i 1 <I SS and i 2 >0 V DD -V SD4 (sat) < v o1 < V DD V SS v G1 >>V G2, i 1 =I SS and i 2 =0 V DD V SS vg1<vg2, i1>0 and i2<iss vo1=vg2-vgs2,act(iss/2), VSS if M5 act. VOH see equation below tabl vg1<<vg2, i1>0 and i2<iss VSS VOH see equation below tabl vg2>vg1, i1>0 and i2<iss VS2(ISS/2)<vo1<VS2(ISS/2)VDS2(sat) VOH see equation below tabl vg2>>vg1, i1>0 and i2<iss VG1-VGS1(ISS/2), VSS if M5 active VOH see equation below tabl vg2<vg1, i1<iss and i2>0 VDD-VSD4(sat) < vo1 < VDD VSS vg2<<vg1, i1=iss and i2=0 VDD VSS V OH = V DD (V DD -V G6 (min)- V TP ) x i3 8I 7 1-1- 6 (V DD -VG6(min)- V TP )2 M3 M4 v G1 M1 M2 v v out G2 C II I SS M7 VBias M5 - V SS Fig. 8.2-3 V DD i 4 v o1 i 1 i 2 C I M6

Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-27 Trip Point of an Inverter In order to determine the propagation delay time, it is necessary to know when the second stage of the two-stage comparator begins to turn on. Second stage: Trip point: Assume that M6 and M7 are saturated. (We know that the steepest slope occurs for this condition.) Equate i 6 to i 7 and solve for v in which becomes the trip point. K N (W 7 /L 7 ) v in = V TRP = V DD - V TP - K P (W 6 /L 6 ) (V Bias- V SS -V TN ) Example: If W 7 /L 7 = W 6 /L 6, V DD = 2.5V, V SS = -2.5V, and V Bias = 0V the trip point for the circuit above is V TRP = 2.5-0.7-110/50 (0 2.5-0.7) = -0.870V V Bias v in - V DD V SS M6 i 6 i 7 M7 v out Fig. 8.2-4 Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-28 Propagation Delay Time of a Slewing, Two-Stage, Open-Loop Comparator Previously we calculated the propagation delay time for a nonslewing comparator. If the comparator slews, then the propagation delay time is found from dv i i i = C i dt = C v i i i t i where C i is the capacitance to ground at the output of the i-th stage The propagation delay time of the i-th stage is, V i t i = t i = C i I i The propagation delay time is found by summing the delays of each stage. t p = t 1 t 2 t 3

Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-29 Example 310-4 - Propagation Time Delay of a Two-Stage, Open-Loop Comparator For the two-stage comparator shown V DD = 2.5V assume that C I = 0.2pF and C II = 5pF. M3 M4 M6 4.5μm 4.5μm 38μm Also, assume that v G1 = 0V and that v G2 1μm 1μm 1μm v has the waveform shown. If the input o1 voltage is large enough to cause slew to 30μA M1 M2 C I = v dominate, find the propagation time delay G1 3μm 3μm 0.2pF 1μm 1μm of the rising and falling output of the v comparator and give the propagation time G2 234μA delay of the comparator. 30μA 2.5V 0V -2.5V v G2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 t(μs) Fig. 8.2-5 4.5μm 1μm Solution 1.) Total delay = sum of the first and second stage delays, t 1 and t 2 2.) First, consider the change of v G2 from -2.5V to 2.5V at 0.2μs. The last row of table on Slide 310-28 gives v o1 = 2.5V and v out = -2.5V 3.) t f1, requires C I, V o1, and I 5. C I = 0.2pF, I 5 = 30μA and V 1 can be calculated by finding the trip point of the output stage. M8 M5 4.5μm 1μm V SS = -2.5V M7 35μm 1μm v out C II = 5pF Fig. 8.2-5A Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-30 Example 310-4 - Continued 4.) The trip point of the output stage by setting the current of M6 when saturated equal to 234μA. 6 234 2 2 (V SG6 - V TP )2 = 234μA V SG6 = 0.7 50 38 = 1.196V Therefore, the trip point of the second stage is V TRP2 = 2.5-1.196 = 1.304V Therefore, V 1 = 2.5V - 1.304V = V SG6 = 1.196V. Thus the falling propagation time delay of the first stage is t fo1 = 0.2pF 1.196V 30μA = 8 ns 5.) The rising propagation time delay of the second stage requires C II, V out, and I 6. C II is given as 5pF, V out = 2.5V (assuming the trip point of the circuit connected to the output of the comparator is 0V), and I 6 can be found as follows: V G6 (guess) 0.5[V G6 (I 6 =234μA) V G6 (min)] V G6 (min) = V G1 - V GS1 (I SS /2) V DS2 -V GS1 (I SS /2) = -0.7 - V G6 (guess) 0.5(1.304V-1.00V) = 0.152V 2 15 110 3 = -1.00V Therefore V SG6 = 2.348V and I 6 = 6 2 (V SG6 - V TP ) 2 = 38 50 2 (2.348-0.7)2 = 2,580μA

Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-31 Example 310-4 - Continued 6.) The rising propagation time delay for the output can expressed as t rout = 5pF 2.5V 2580μA-234μA = 5.3 ns Thus the total propagation time delay of the rising output of the comparator is approximately 13.3 ns and most of this delay is attributable to the first stage. 7.) Next consider the change of v G2 from 2.5V to -2.5V at 0.4μs. We shall assume that v G2 has been at 2.5V long enough for the conditions of the table on Slide 310-28 to be valid. Therefore, v o1 V SS = -2.5V and v out V DD. The propagation time delays for the first and second stages are calculated as t ro1 = 0.2pF 3V 1.304V-(-1.00V) 30μA v = 15.4 ns out 2V V t fout = 5pF 2.5V TRP6 = 1.304V 234μA = 53.42ns 1V 8.) The total propagation time delay of the 0V falling output is 68.82 ns. Taking the v o1 average of the rising and falling propagation -1V time delays gives a propagation time delay -2V Falling prop. for this two-stage, open-loop comparator of Rising prop. delay time about 41.06ns. delay time -3V 200ns 300ns 400ns 500ns 600ns Time Fig. 8.2-6 Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-32 SUMMARY The two-stage, open-loop comparator has two poles which should as large as possible The transient response of a two-stage, open-loop comparator will be limited by either the bandwidth or the slew rate It is important to know the initial states of a two-stage, open-loop comparator when finding the propagation delay time If the comparator is gainbandwidth limited then the poles should be as large as possible for minimum propagation delay time If the comparator is slew rate limited, then the current sinking and sourcing ability should be as large as possible