Yield Energy of Asphalt Binders Using the Dynamic Shear Rheometer

Similar documents
Estimating Damage Tolerance of Asphalt Binders Using the Linear Amplitude Sweep

Estimating Fatigue Resistance Damage Tolerance of Asphalt Binders Using the Linear Amplitude Sweep

ARC Update - Binder Fatigue

Phenomenological models for binder rutting and fatigue. University of Wisconsin Research Team

A two level factorial experimental design for evaluation of viscoelastic properties of bitumens containing a surfactant warm additive

RILEM inter-laboratory test on binder rheology test methods DSR and BBR.

Predicting Oxidative Age Hardening in Asphalt Pavement

NEW APPROACH FOR THE FATIGUE CHARACTERISATION OF BITUMINOUS BINDERS

Bitumen fatigue performance evaluation - with or without RAP - a real challenge

Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate 1

Linear Amplitude Sweep Test:

DYNAMIC MODULUS MASTER CURVE AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SUPERPAVE HMA CONTAINING VARIOUS POLYMER TYPES

Crude oil sources and cut point as keys for the prediction of the mechanical performance of bitumen

The 2S2P1D: An Excellent Linear Viscoelastic Model

NCHRP Project / Task 400. Effect of Elevation on Rolling Thin Film Oven Aging of Asphalt Binder

Standard Test Methods for Glass-Bonded Mica Used as Electrical Insulation 1

Rheological Properties and Fatigue Resistance of Crumb Rubber Modified Bitumen

Nonlinear oscillatory shear tests applied to bitumen: analysis and application of large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS)

GTR: DSR Evaluation and Geometry Recommendation

PERFORMANCE BASED CHARACTERISATION OF BITUMINOUS BINDERS

Modification of the Rolling Thin Film Oven (RTFO) Test for Realistic Short-term Aging of Asphalt Rubber Binders

Asphalt Mix Performance Testing on Field Project on MTO Hwy 10

The Effect of Aging on Binder Properties of Porous Asphalt Concrete

Role of Binders in Pavement Performance

Using Rheological Properties to Evaluate Storage Stability and Setting Behaviors of Emulsified asphalts

Investigation of Suitable Testing Method for GTR Modified Asphalt Binder

Estimating Effect of RAP and RAS on PG grade of Binders

Use of Polyphosphoric Acid in Asphalt Pavement Performance Prediction WRI/FHA Symposium Cheyenne, WY June 2005

LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR VISCOELASTIC BEHAVIOUR OF BINDERS AND ASPHALTS

Standard Practice for Heat Aging of Plastics Without Load 1

USE OF BINDER RHEOLOGY TO PREDICT THE CRACKING PERFORMANCE OF SBS-MODIFIED MIXTURE

V. O. Bulatović* 1, V. Rek 1 and K. J. Marković 2

DYNAMIC AND TRANSIENT TESTING OF ASPHALT BINDER AND PAVING MIX

Background PG G* sinδ

Prediction of Complex Shear Modulus and Fracture Properties of Asphalt Binders with Oxidative Aging

Investigating the Influence of SBS and Gilsonite on the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using Statistical Analysis

INVESTIGATING THE RHEOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOUTH AFRICAN ROAD BITUMENS

Evaluation of Rutting Depth in Flexible Pavements by Using Finite Element Analysis and Local Empirical Model

Relating Dynamic Shear Modulus (G*) of Performance Grade (PG) Asphalt Binders to Nanoindentation Stiffness (E)

Stresses and Strains in flexible Pavements

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF MATERIALS MANAGEMENT. VERIFYING THERMOMETERS ITM No T

Advances in performance evaluation of asphalt binders

Rheology Based Specifications for Asphalt Binders used in Roofing

Fatigue of Asphalt Binders Measured using Parallel Plate and Torsion Cylinder Geometries

Using the Bitumen Bond Strength Test & Sessile Drop Method

October 2006 Research Report: UCPRC-RR Authors: B. Tsai, D. Jones, J. Harvey, and C. Monismith PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY:

Rheological, Chemical, Mechanical Properties of Re-refined Engine Oil Bottoms (REOB) Modified Binder

Performance Characteristics of Asphalt Mixtures Incorporating Treated Ground Tire Rubber Added During the Mixing Process

PROPERTIES OF MASTICS USING DIFFERENT FILLERS WITH BOTH UNMODIFIED AND EVA-MODIFIED BINDERS

2007 SEAUPG CONFERENCE-SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

STUDY OF RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF BITUMINOUS BINDERS IN MIDDLE AND HIGH TEMPERATURES

USE OF BBR TEST DATA TO ENHANCE THE ACCURACY OF G* -BASED WITCZAK MODEL PREDICTIONS

A Discussion of Peltier Cooling Compared to Chilled Air Cooling and 4 mm DSR Results (and related issues)

TEST METHOD FOR DETERMINING BREAKAWAY FORCE OF A MAGNET

Effect of Polymer Modification on Rheological Properties of Asphalt

RELIABILITY OF RHEOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS IN BITUMENS BY MEANS OF DYNAMIC SHEAR RHEOMETERS

Rheology considerations for recycled and recovered binder

86400 Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia

Investigation of Emulsified Asphalts Properties by DSR to Evaluate their Performance

Code_Aster. SSNP161 Biaxial tests of Kupfer

MODELLING THE RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF BITUMINOUS BINDERS USING A MECHANICAL MODEL

Aging characteristics of bitumen related to the performance of porous asphalt in practice

Lecture 7 Constitutive Behavior of Asphalt Concrete

A Multiple Laboratory Study of Hot Mix Asphalt Performance Testing

2015 North Dakota Asphalt Conference

KINEXUS DSR SERIES REDEFINING RHEOMETER CAPABILITIES FOR ASPHALT TESTING

Flexible Pavement Design

SEAUPG 2009 CONFERENCE-HILTON HEAD ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA

Investigation on the cooling medium effect in the characterization of asphalt binder with the Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR)

OHD L-14 METHOD OF TEST FOR DETERMINING THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND UNIT WEIGHT OF COMPACTED BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola

Difference Between Fixed and Floating Reference Points AASHTO T-321

Standard Test Method for Determination of the Point Load Strength Index of Rock 1

INVESTIGATION OF RHEOLOGICAL AND NANO-RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF ASPHALT BINDERS. A Thesis POOYAN KABIR

FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges

The Graduate School. Department of Civil Engineering EVALUATION OF LOW-TEMPERATURE FRACTURE PROPERTIES OF ASPHALT BINDER

Standard Test Method for Coefficient of Linear Thermal Expansion of Plastics Between 30 C and 30 C with a Vitreous Silica Dilatometer 1

Standard Guide for Determination of the Thermal Resistance of Low-Density Blanket-Type Mineral Fiber Insulation 1

Mechanistic Investigation of Granular Base and Subbase Materials A Saskatchewan Case Study

Analysis of Non-Linear Dynamic Behaviours in Asphalt Concrete Pavements Under Temperature Variations

APPENDIX A PROGRAM FLOW CHARTS

Standard Practice for Calculating Formulation Physical Constants of Paints and Coatings 1

Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide: A User s Perspective. Brian D. Prowell, Ph.D., P.E.

Why Characterize Binder Rheology With Mathematical Models?

Asphalt Expert Task Group Update and Emerging Topics

Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil 1

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 709 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

The Superpave System Filling the gaps.

TEMPERATURE EFFECTS IN LINEAR AMPLITUDE SWEEP TESTING AND ANALYSIS

If you have any questions feel free to let me know and I will do my best to help answer them.

Arizona Pavements and Materials Conference Phoenix, Arizona. November 15-16, John Siekmeier P.E. M.ASCE

European perspective of binder characterisation. Mike Southern Technical Director Eurobitume

Implementation of M-E PDG in Kansas

Characterizing Nonlinear Viscoelastic Response of Asphaltic Materials

2008 SEAUPG CONFERENCE-BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA

Non Newtonian Fluid Dynamics

Workshop 4PBB First Steps for the perpetual pavement design: through the analysis of the fatigue life

both an analytical approach and the pole method, determine: (a) the direction of the

Self-healing of asphalt mixes, containing conductive modified bitumen, using microwave heating

INFLUENCE AND MECHANISM OF ULTRAVIOLET AGING ON BITUMEN PERFORMANCE

Transcription:

Standard Method of Test for Yield Energy of Asphalt Binders Using the Dynamic Shear Rheometer AASHTO Designation: T XXX-09 1. SCOPE 1.1. This test method covers the indication of asphalt binders resistance yield-type failure under monotonic constant shear-rate loading. The Binder Yield Energy test (BYET) is conducted using the Dynamic Shear Rheometer at the intermediate temperature performance grade (PG Grade) of the asphalt binder. The test method can be used with material aged using AASHTO T 240 (RTFOT) and/or AASHTO R 28 (PAV) to simulate the estimated aging for in-service asphalt pavements. 1.2. The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. 1.3. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety problems, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 2. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS 2.1. AASHTO Standards: M 320, Standard Specification for Performance Graded Asphalt Binder T 240, Effect of Heat and Air on Rolling Film of Asphalt (Rolling Thin-Film Oven Test) R 28, Accelerated Aging of Asphalt Binder Using a Pressurized Aging Vessel (PAV) T 315, Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) 2.2. ASTM Standards: D 8, Standard Terminology Relating to Materials for Roads and Pavements D 2872, Standard Test Method for Effect of Heat and Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt (Rolling Thin-Film Oven Test) D 6521, Standard Practice for Accelerated Aging of Asphalt Binder Using a Pressurized Aging Vessel (PAV) D 7175, Standard Test Method for Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer 3. TERMINOLOGY 3.1 Definitions 3.1.1 Definitions of terms used in this practice may be found in Terminology D 8 determined from common English usage, or combinations of both.

4. SUMMARY OF TEST METHOD 4.1 Asphalt binder is first aged using Test Method AASHTO T 240 (ASTM D 2872) (RTFOT) to represent short-term aging of asphalt pavements, or the material may be further aged using AASHTO R 28 (ASTM D 6521-08) prior to testing in order to simulate long-term aging of asphalt pavements. A sample is prepared consistent with Test Method AASHTO T 315 (ASTM D 7175-05) (DSR) using the 8-mm parallel plate geometry with a 2-mm gap setting. The sample is tested in monotonic shear using a constant shear rate to continuously load the sample until peak shear strength is achieved and the sample has yielded. 5. SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1. This method is intended to evaluate the amount of energy required to cause yielding in asphalt binder. The yield energy of the material can be used to identify the relative performance of different materials, and the stress-strain response curve can be useful in identifying the presence of polymer modifiers in the material. 6. PROCEDURE 6.1. Condition the asphalt binder in accordance with T 240 (RTFOT) for short-term performance, or follow with R 28 (PAV) for long-term performance. 6.2. Sample preparation The sample for the BYET is prepared following T 315 for 8-mm plates. The temperature control also follows the T 315 requirements. 6.2.1. This test may be performed on the same sample that was previously used to determine the rheological properties in the DSR on PAV residue as specified in M 320. 6.3. Test protocol The binder yield energy test is run at the selected temperature and applies a constant shear rate of 1% strain per second. Both stress (, Pa) and strain (, %) are recorded at a sampling rate of one data point every two seconds. The test is concluded once the material achieves 3,600% strain (60 minutes). 7. CALCULATION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS 7.1. For the results of the binder yield energy test, the data should be analyzed as follows: 7.1.1. For the first data point, ( i 1, i 1 ), the area, A i 1, under the stress-strain curve at that point is calculated as A i 1 = ( i 1 )( i 1 ) / 2 7.1.2. For subsequent data points, the area under the curve is calculated as the sum of the trapeziodal areas between each data point, known as the incremental energy, until the point of maximum shear stress ( max,,max ). The total area is recorded as the Yield Energy, which is calculated using the formula below:

FIGURE 7.1 Visual representation of Binder Yield Energy Test parameters. 8. REPORT 8.1. Report the following, if known: 8.1.1. Sample identification, 8.1.2. PG Grade and Test Temperature, nearest 0.1 C 8.1.3. Maximum shear stress, max, kpa. 8.1.4. Shear strain at maximum shear stress,,max, %. 8.1.5. Yield Energy, MPa. 9. PRECISION AND BIAS 9.1. 10. KEYWORDS 10.1. Asphalt binder, shear strength, yield energy, DSR. 11. REFERENCES

11.1. 1 The numbers in parentheses refer to the list of references at the end of this standard. APPENDIX X1. SAMPLE CALCULATIONS X1.1. Example data from the BYET is given in Table X1.1. Table X1.1 Example data output from BYET Shear Strain Shear Stress [%] [Pa] 2 31,081 4 44,824 6 53,874 8 61,042 10 67,072 12 72,496 14 77,216 X1.2. Sample calculations: X1.2.1. The first data point is used to calculate A i 1 as described in Section 7.1.1.: A i 1 = ( i 1 )( i 1 ) / 2 = (31,081) (2%) = 311 Pa. X1.2.2. The following data points are used to determine the incremental energy areas as described in Section 7.1.2.: 59 Pa. X1.2.3. This procedure is repeated, giving the results shown in Table X1.2. The values shown in the incremental energy column are summed only to the ( max,,max ) boundary to calculate Yield Energy.

Table X1.2 Example data output and energy calculations from the BYET Shear Strain Shear Stress Incremental Energy [%] [Pa] [Pa] 2 31,081 311 4 44,824 759 6 53,874 987 8 61,042 1,149 10 67,072 1,281 12 72,496 1,396 14 77,216 1,497