On the Development and Implementations of the New Semi- Dynamic Datum for Indonesia

Similar documents
Semi-Dynamic Datum of Indonesia

On the Development and Implementations of the New Semi-Dynamic Datum for Indonesia

Utilization RT-PPP in Order to Speed Up Land Parcel Registration in Indonesia Case Study Applied Trimble CenterPoint RTX in Sumatera and Java

Report for 15th PCGIAP Meeting at 18th UNRCC-AP Working Group 1 Regional Geodesy

CORS Network and Datum Harmonisation in the Asia-Pacific Region. Richard Stanaway and Craig Roberts

A Deformation Model to support a Next Generation Australian Geodetic Datum

Geodetic Activities in Indonesia

TSUNAMI AND EARTHQUAKE ACTIVITY IN INDONESIA *

Roles of Geospatial Information for Disaster Risk Reduction Management in Indonesia

Next Generation Australian Datum. Permanent Committee on Geodesy, ICSM

GEODETIC NETWORK OF SAUDI ARABIA AND FIDUCIAL STATIONS. GFN OF Saudi Arabia in Based on ITRF2000 Datum

Actual Continuous Kinematic Model (ACKIM) of the Earth s Crust based on ITRF2014

GEOLOGICAL HAZARD MITIGATION STRATEGY IN INDONESIA

Rigid Plate Transformations to Support PPP and Absolute Positioning in Africa

The Earthquake of Padang, Sumatra of 30 September 2009 scientific information and update

This presentation covers the following areas

Do we need to update PNG94 to PNG2020?

Making Sense of Evolving Reference Frames for North America

Case Study of Japan: Crustal deformation monitoring with GNSS and InSAR

The Impact of the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) Earthquake on the Geodetic Infrastructure in New Zealand 1

Geodetic Datum of Indonesian Maritime Boundaries: Status and Problems

The International Terrestrial Reference System and ETRS89: Part I : General concepts

GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 3: Finding location and velocity data for PBO GPS stations

GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 5: 2014 South Napa earthquake GPS strain analysis student exercise

Inquiry: Sumatran earthquakes with GPS Earth Science Education

Strengthening Geospatial Information Management in Indonesia

Integration Activities in Indonesia: The Integration of Land and Marine Spatial Data Sets as Part of Indonesian SDI Development

Frames for the Future New Datum Definitions for Modernization of the U.S. National Spatial Reference System

Modernization of National Geodetic Datum in China *

Case study of Japan: Reference Frames in Practice

STUDY ON TSUNAMIGENIC EARTHQUAKE CRITERIA FOR THE INDONESIAN TSUNAMI EARLY WARNING SYSTEM

FORMAT FOR TECHNICAL PAPERS

LOCAL TSUNAMIS: CHALLENGES FOR PREPAREDNESS AND EARLY WARNING

How GNSS CORS in Japan works for geodetic control and disaster mitigations

COUNTRY REPORT THE SEVENTEENTH PERMANENT COMMITTEE ON GIS INFRASTRUCTURE FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC (PCGIAP) MEETING JULY 21 22, 2011,

Banda Aceh December 26th Earthquake monitored by GPS

Case Study of Australia

Geodetic & Geospatial Infrastructure/Systems

On Reliability of the Annex Map of the 1915 Land Boundary Treaty between Indonesia and Malaysia

BUILDING AN ACCURATE GIS

System of Geodetic Parameters Parametry Zemli 1990 PZ-90.11

4 Survey Datums. 4.1 Horizontal Datum Policy SURVEY DATUMS SEPTEMBER 2006

Realizing a geodetic reference frame using GNSS in the presence of crustal deformations: The case of Greece

Earth Issue: November 2017

Development of the Kingdom of Tonga Cyclone Emergency Recovery and Management System using Geospatial Tools

New satellite mission for improving the Terrestrial Reference Frame: means and impacts

Lecture 4. Coordinate Systems & Projections

Military Geographic Institute

NTUA, Faculty of Rural and Surveying Engineering, Dionysos Satellite Observatory, Higher Geodesy Laboratory NOA, Institute of Geodynamics 1

Geographic Information Systems class # 1 February 19, Coordinate reference systems in GIS: geodetic coordinates

SIRGAS: Basis for Geosciences, Geodata, and Navigation in Latin America

Lab 9: Satellite Geodesy (35 points)

Recent GNSS Developments and Reference Frame Issues in Turkey. Onur LENK and Bahadir AKTUĞ

The Implementation of a Semi-Dynamic Datum in New Zealand Ten Years On

Active deformation in eastern Indonesia and the Philippines from GPS and seismicity data

LEADS. The Essential Elements of a 3-D Geographic Coordinate

Positioning the Pacific: NOAA s Geospatial Activities. Juliana Blackwell, Director NOAA s National Geodetic Survey March 6, 2012

Operational Aspects of GNSS CORS What is a GNSS CORS system used for?

Geodesy on the move. Craig Allinson. Dealing with dynamic coordinate reference systems. IOGP Geodesy Subcommittee. EPUG London, November 2017

Vertical Reference Frame Pacific

CHILEAN PART OF SIRGAS REFERENCE FRAME, REALIZATION, ADOPTION, MAINTENANCE AND ACTUAL STATUS. Geodesy for Planet Earth IAG 2009, Buenos Aires

Control Surveys and Coordinate Systems

GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATE SYSTEMS

From Global to National Geodetic Reference Frames: how are they connected and why are they needed?

LEMBAGA PENERBANGAN DAN ANTARIKSA NASIONAL INDONESIAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICS AND SPACE (LAPAN)

The U.S. National Spatial Reference System in 2022

Map projections. Rüdiger Gens

NGS and the Modernization of the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS)

Update on the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) : ITRF2014. Zuheir Altamimi

Lecture 2. Map Projections and GIS Coordinate Systems. Tomislav Sapic GIS Technologist Faculty of Natural Resources Management Lakehead University

NATRF 2022 AND LDP OCTOBER 11, 2017

12/26/2012. Geographic Information Systems * * * * GIS (... yrezaei

This week s topics. Week 6. FE 257. GIS and Forest Engineering Applications. Week 6

The Challenge of Earthquake Disaster in Indonesia. Hery Harjono Indonesian Institute of Sciences

Report of PCGIAP to the 18 th United Nations Regional Cartographic Conference for Asia and the Pacific (UNRCC-AP) for the period

The many paths to a common ground: A comparison of transformations between GDA94 and ITRF

Indonesian Multiscale Grid System for Environmental Data

The Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) of the International Association of Geodesy, IAG

Report on Banda Aceh mega-thrust earthquake, December 26, 2004

Frequent epoch reference frames instead of instant station positions and constant velocities

The development and implementation of New Zealand Geodetic Datum 2000

Understanding Projections for GIS

What is Geodesy? Types of Geodesy terrestrial or classical geodesy space geodesy theoretical geodesy

The problem (1/2) GPS velocity fields in plate boundary zones are very smooth. What does this smoothness hide?

Positioning in the Pacific Islands

Report on Banda Aceh mega-thrust earthquake, December 26, 2004

A Multi-Purpose Continuous GPS Network within the boundary zones of the Eurasian, African, and Arabian plates

ITRF2014 Et la prise en compte des mouvements non linéaires

DATA BASE DEVELOPMENT OF ETA (ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL) FOR TSUNAMI DISASTER MITIGATION AT SOUTHWESTERN CITIES OF ACEH, INDONESIA

Homework. In GIS Fundamentals book, Chapter 2, exact formula

Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning System: Example from the 12 th September 2007 Tsunami

REGIONAL GROUND MOTION PREDICTION AND DATABASE

PADANG EARTHQUAKE, WEST SUMATRA ON MARCH 6, 2007

PPDM Data Management Symposium March 7, 2012 Houston

UNITED NATIONS E/CONF.97/6/IP. 33

NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources Lesson 4 Map Projections

The Role Of Ina-SDI For Disaster Management

U.S. Datums: Where We ve Been,

Seismic Activity near the Sunda and Andaman Trenches in the Sumatra Subduction Zone

Prof. E. Calais Purdue University - EAS Department CIVL 3273

Transcription:

On the Development and Implementations of the New Semi- Dynamic Datum for Indonesia SusiloSUSILO 1, HasanuddinZ. ABIDIN 2, IrwanMEILANO 2, Benyamin SAPEII 2 1) Center for Geodetic Control Network and Geodynamic, Geospatial Information Agency, JalanRaya Jakarta-Bogor Km. 46,Cibinong, Indonesia 2) Institute of TechnologyBandung, Jl. Ganesa10 Bandung, Indonesia Indonesian Geodetic Datums 1862-1970 1970-1995 1996-2013 2013 - Local Topocentric Datum Static Datum Datum Genuk, Bukit Rimpah, Gunung Sahara, Serindung, MoncongLowe, T21 Sorong National Topocentric Datum Static Datum Datum ID74 National Geocentric Datum Static Datum DGN95 National Geocentric Datum Semi-dynamic Datum SRGI2013 Deformation Model Launched on October 17 th 2013 FIG Working Week 2015 1

Geodetic Datums in Indonesia 1. Dutch Colonial Time: LOCAL TOPOCENTRIC DATUM (Several, Static Datum) 2. ID 1974 : NATIONAL TOPOCENTRIC DATUM (Padang Datum, Static Datum) 3. DGN 1995 : NATIONAL GEOCENTRIC DATUM (Static Datum) 4. SRGI 2013 : NATIONAL GEOCENTRIC DATUM (Semi-Dynamic Datum ) Indonesian Local (Topocentric) Datum Reference Ellipsoid: Bessel 1841 (a = 6377397 m, 1/f = 298.15) Hasanuddin Z. Abidin, 2005 FIG Working Week 2015 2

Indonesian Local (Topocentric) Datum Realization of Local (Topocentric) datum in Indonesia was conducted using Triangulationmethod. TRIANGULATION NETWORK IN INDONESIA Region Started Datum Java& Madura 1862 G. Genuk (Batavia) Sumatera 1883 G. Genuk (Batavia) Bangka 1917 Bukit Rimpah Sulawesi 1913 Moncong Lowe Flores 1960 G. Genuk (Batavia) Hasanuddin Z. Abidin, 2014 Triangulation Stations in Indonesia courtesy of Edi Priyanto, BIG Hasanuddin Z. Abidin, 2014 FIG Working Week 2015 3

Geodetic Datum in Indonesia 1. Dutch Colonial Time: LOCAL TOPOCENTRIC DATUM (Several, Static Datum) 2. ID 1974 : NATIONAL TOPOCENTRIC DATUM (Padang Datum, Static Datum) 3. DGN 1995 : NATIONAL GEOCENTRIC DATUM (Static Datum) 4. SRGI 2013 : NATIONAL GEOCENTRIC DATUM (Semi-Dynamic Datum ) Datum Indonesia 1974 (DI-1974) (Padang Datum, Static Datum) 1. Coordinates of Datum Point (Padang, West Sumatra) : λ = 00 o 56 38,414 φ = 100 o 22 08,804 h = + 3,912 m 2. Reference Ellipsoid : INS (Indonesian National Spheroid), with a= 6378160 m, andf = 1/298.247(basedon the GRS 1967 figure but with 1/f taken to 3 decimal places exactly) 3. Realized using geodetic surveys based on Doppler Satellite observation. FIG Working Week 2015 4

Doppler Stations in Indonesia courtesy of Ir. Edi Priyanto, BIG Hasanuddin Z. Abidin, 2014 Geodetic Datum in Indonesia 1. Dutch Colonial Time: LOCAL TOPOCENTRIC DATUM (Several, Static Datum) 2. ID 1974 : NATIONAL TOPOCENTRIC DATUM (Padang Datum, Static Datum) 3. DGN 1995 : NATIONAL GEOCENTRIC DATUM (Static Datum) 4. SRGI 2013 : NATIONAL GEOCENTRIC DATUM (Semi-Dynamic Datum ) FIG Working Week 2015 5

Datum Geodesi Nasional 1995 (DGN-1995) (Geocentric Datum, Static Datum) 1. First national geocentric datum. 2. Reference Ellipsoid : WGS 1984. 3. Realized using GPS static surveys and continuous observations (GPS CORS) Hasanuddin Z. Abidin, 2014 GPS Control Stations in Indonesia (2002) courtesy of Edi Priyanto, BIG Hasanuddin Z. Abidin, 2014 FIG Working Week 2015 6

GPS Control Stations in Indonesia (2008) courtesy of Cecep Subarya, BIG Around 950 stations Hasanuddin Z. Abidin, 2014 Geodetic Datum in Indonesia 1. Dutch Colonial Time: LOCAL TOPOCENTRIC DATUM (Several, Static Datum) 2. ID 1974 : NATIONAL TOPOCENTRIC DATUM (Padang Datum, Static Datum) 3. DGN 1995 : NATIONAL GEOCENTRIC DATUM (Static Datum) 4. SRGI 2013 : NATIONAL GEOCENTRIC DATUM (Semi-Dynamic Datum) FIG Working Week 2015 7

Tectonic Complexity of Indonesian Region Hall, 2009 Intersection of 3 major plates. Wide range of tectonic environments, including island arc volcanism, subduction zones, and arc-continent collision SEISMIC COMPLEXITY OF INDONESIAN REGION Complex plate boundaries High seismicity, shallow EQs mostly confined at the subduction zone FIG Working Week 2015 8

TECTONIC COMPLEXITY OF INDONESIAN REGION (DISPLACEMENT) Data : Stevent et.al.,[1999/2000], Nugroho et.al., [2000]. Bock,et.al., [2003] Socquet et.al., [2006], Subarya et.al.,[2007]. Abidin et al., [2007], Meilano et al., [2012] Coordinate Displacements Displacement (mm) 3D coordinate displacements due to motion of tectonic blocks 28 cm 65 cm Coordinate displacements due totectonic block motion since 1996, from GPS observations; courtesy of Susilo(ITB). courtesy of Irwan Meilano (ITB) Hasanuddin Z. Abidin, 2014 FIG Working Week 2015 9

Coordinate Displacements Displacement (mm) 620 cm 3D coordinate displacements due to earthquakes Coordinate displacements due to earthquakes since 1996, from GPS observations; courtesy of Susilo(ITB). courtesy of Irwan Meilano (ITB) Hasanuddin Z. Abidin, 2014 Indonesian Geospatial Reference System, IGRS 2013 Sistem Referensi Geospasial Indonesia, SRGI 2013 (launched: 11 October 2013) Semi-Dynamic datum. Connected to the global ITRF2008 reference frame. Reference epoch: 1 January 2012 Reference Ellipsoid: WGS 1984 (a = 6378137.0 m; 1/f = 298,257223563). If a new version of the ITRF reference frame becomes available, then the IGRS reference frame will also be updated accordingly. A velocity model, which incorporates tectonic motion and earthquake related deformation, is used to transform coordinates at an observation epoch to or from this reference epoch. FIG Working Week 2015 10

Realization of IGRS2013 Plate boundaries from Argus et al. (2011) cgps BIG cgps BPN cgps SUGAR sgps BIG Realization of IGRS2013 Deformation model based on 4 tectonic plates, 7 tectonic blocks, and 126 earthquakes data Burma Eurasia Ph. Sea Pacfic Sunda Molucca Banda Bird Head Maoke Timor Australia courtesy of Susilo (BIG). Hasanuddin Z. Abidin, 2014 FIG Working Week 2015 11

Continuous GPS of BIG Indonesia Total in 2013 = 118 Stations Continuous GPS of BPN Indonesia Total in 2013 = 183 Stations FIG Working Week 2015 12

Static GPS of BIG Indonesia Total in 2013 = 1350 Monuments New Velocty Model of IGRS 2013 New velocity model after Abidin et al. (2015), derived from 1996 2013 GPS data FIG Working Week 2015 13

Closing Remarks (1) Updating the Velocity Model What are the criterias for updating the model? Time periodand spatial coverage for updating the velocity (deformation) model? Reasons for updating the model? 1. Displacements due to tectonic plates and blocks motions. 2. Earthquakes related deformations. 3. Displacements due to landslides, volcanic eruptions, land subsidences, etc. Closing Remarks (2) Socialization of IGRS 2013 Educationand socialization to all related users and stakeholders, about all aspects of the datum change, has to be well conducted. Fast, reliable and user-friendly web-based and online service systems must be established for the implementation of the new datum. BIG (Geospatial Agency of Indonesia) has to be a leader in implemntation and socialization of this new datum FIG Working Week 2015 14

http://srgi.big.go.id/peta/jkg.jsp Thank you very much for your attention FIG Working Week 2015 15

Realization and Implementation of SRGI 2013 Deformation (Velocity) Model has to be established for t coordinate transformation obs t ref The model coverage : all over Indonesia. Indonesian area cannot be represented only by a single velocity model. Updating time for each model? How to accomodate the deformation related earthquakes? FIG Working Week 2015 16

Velocity Modelbased on the plate motion model MORVEL (DeMetset al. 2010) courtesy of Irwan Meilano (ITB) and Susilo (BIG). Hasanuddin Z. Abidin, 2014 ITRF 2008 velocities at the BIG GPS CORS stations computed using GPS CORS data from 2010 to 2013 courtesy of Susilo (BIG). Hasanuddin Z. Abidin, 2014 FIG Working Week 2015 17

The Helmerttransformation parameters of the estimated GAMIT/GLOBK solution with respect to ITRF2008 epoch 2005 Preliminary Euler pole parameters as estimated from GPS CORS solutions in Indonesia.. Plate Latitude (deg deg) Longitude (deg deg) Rate (deg deg/myr Myr) Semi Major (deg deg) Semi Minor (deg) Azimuth (deg deg) Rate wrms (mm/yr) uncertainty (deg deg/myr Myr) N E AU 32.119 37.615 0.635 0.18 0.04 106.0 0.0006 0.44 0.83 BS 0.271 120.474 2.083 0.36 0.03 348.3 0.0918 1.04 1.41 BH -52.415 54.260 0.536 5.33 0.12 85.7 0.0037 0.20 1.42 MO 8.015-49.090 1.198 1.99 0.11 55.1 0.1774 0.06 0.05 SU 45.162 128.115 0.313 1.42 0.14 27.8 0.0052 0.70 0.97 TI 2.461 113.389 1.350 0.27 0.02 322.3 0.0260 2.64 0.72 In the abovetable:au = Australian plate; BS = Banda Sea block; BH = Birds Head block; MO = Molucca Sea block; SU = Sunda block; TI = Timor block courtesy of Susilo (BIG). Hasanuddin Z. Abidin, 2014 FIG Working Week 2015 18

Updating Velocity Model Ref. : Blick et al. (2005) Impact of Earthquakes related deformation Inter-seismic Co-seismic Post-seismic Ref. : Stanaway et al. (2012) FIG Working Week 2015 19

Impact of Earthquakes related deformation What magnitude of earhquake should be considered? Larger than Mw 6.0? Spatial coverage of the deformed area that should be considered? How fast the model should be updated? Socialization to the users? http://srgi.big.go.id/peta/jkg.jsp Hasanuddin Z. Abidin (2013) FIG Working Week 2015 20

Closing Remarks (1) Howto synergize the velocity model derived using the plate motion model (e.g. MORVEL) with the velocity field estimated using pgpsand GPS CORS data? Can the existing plate and block motion model be able to accurately predict the velocity field for all over Indonesia. In this case, the interplatecoupling models for all plates and blocks interfaces in Indonesian region should also be established. Detailmechanisms on handling secular trends, earthquakes offsets (co-seismic deformation), and post-earthquakes motion (post-seismic deformation) should also be established. Closing Remarks (2) The Indonesian GPS CORS network should be densified to cover all of Indonesia, especially Borneo Island and the eastern parts of Indonesia. With a denser GPS CORS network, the deformation model of IGRS 2013 can be estimated more reliably and in more detail. Cooperation and coordination with all related positioning and mapping institution in Indonesia (e.g. BPN, Army Topographic Agency, Navy Hydrographic Agency) should also be maintained by BIG throughout the implementation process of IGRS 2013. FIG Working Week 2015 21

Terima Kasih FIG Working Week 2015 22