Constraints on Extended Technicolor Models

Similar documents
Updated S 3 Model of Quarks

Estimates of B-Decays into K-Resonances and Dileptons

Determining the Penguin Effect on CP Violation in

Marc Sher. Physics Department. College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Abstract

arxiv:hep-ph/ v4 18 Nov 1999

Moriond QCD La Thuile, March 14 21, Flavour physics in the LHC era. An introduction. Clara Matteuzzi. INFN and Universita Milano-Bicocca

Can the Hbb coupling be equal in magnitude to its Standard Model value but opposite in sign? Howard E. Haber July 22, 2014

Search for new physics in rare D meson decays

Effects on Higgs Boson Properties From Radion Mixing

Beyond Standard Model Effects in Flavour Physics: p.1

Topcolor Models and Scalar Spectrum

Where are we heading?

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 22 Mar 1999

FLAVOUR IN WARPED EXTRA DIMENSIONS

Electroweak Theory: 5

S = 2 decay in Warped Extra Dimensions

Chaehyun Yu. in collaboration with P. Ko (KIAS) and Yuji Omura (Nagoya University) The 16 th LHC Physics Monthly Meeting, KIAS, Korea, Jun 01,

PoS(Kruger 2010)034. CMS searches for new physics. Mara Senghi Soares On behalf of the CMS Collaboration.

The Standard Model and Beyond

Lepton Flavor Violation

LIMIT ON MASS DIFFERENCES IN THE WEINBERG MODEL. M. VELTMAN Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Utrecht, Netherlands

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 27 Oct 1997

Low Scale Flavor Gauge Symmetries

The Dilaton/Radion and the 125 GeV Resonance

Electroweak Physics and Searches for New Physics at HERA

Little Higgs Models Theory & Phenomenology

Gauge U(1) Dark Symmetry and Radiative Light Fermion Masses

Danny van Dyk. B Workshop Neckarzimmern February 19th, Danny van Dyk (TU Dortmund) News on B K µ + µ 1 / 35

KSETA-Course: Accelelerator-Based Particle Physics

Review of D-D Mixing

Search for Next Generations of Quarks and Leptons at the Tevatron and LHC

Lecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model

Rare Hadronic B Decays

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 10 Oct 1995

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 24 Jul 1996

Long distance weak annihilation contribution to

Bounds on scalar leptoquark and scalar gluon masses from current data on S, T, U

Mirror World and Improved Naturalness

Based on arxiv:0812:4320 In collaboration with A. Dedes, J Rosiek. Informal CIHEP Pizza Lunch February 6, 2009

Angular Analysis of the Decay

Is there a Scalar Sector?

Scenarios with Composite Higgs Bosons

Rare beauty and charm decays at LHCb

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 16 Mar 2000

Electroweak Theory, SSB, and the Higgs: Lecture 2

Searches for Leptonic Decays of the B-meson at BaBar

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 25 Feb 2002

Electroweak-scale Right-handed Neutrino Model And 126 GeV Higgs-like Particle

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 1 Feb 2005

Recent Results on Rare B Decays from BaBar and Belle

generation Outline Outline Motivation Electroweak constraints Selected flavor constraints in B and D sector Conclusion Nejc Košnik

Split Supersymmetry A Model Building Approach

Finding the Higgs boson

Where are we heading? Nathan Seiberg IAS 2014

the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 31 May 1997

Partial Compositeness and

Upgrade of ATLAS and CMS for High Luminosity LHC: Detector performance and Physics potential

Ricerca di nuova fisica a HERA

Theory of CP Violation

Flavor physics. Yuval Grossman. Cornell. Y. Grossman Flavor physics APS2009, Denver, 5/2/2009 p. 1

A Two Higgs Doublet Model for the Top Quark

Two-Higgs-doublet models with Higgs symmetry

No Light Top Quark After All* ABSTRACT

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 6 Feb 2004

The pheno analysis of B K ( ) µ + µ decays in 2011+

Scalar leptoquarks from GUT to accommodate the B-physics anomalies

The Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix

+ µ 2 ) H (m 2 H 2

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 27 Nov 2014

arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 14 Jan 2015

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 24 Jan 2017

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 1 Mar 2017

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 15 Dec 1998

Exclusive Radiative Higgs Decays as Probes of Light-Quark Yukawa Couplings

Search for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at B Factories

TeV-scale type-i+ii seesaw mechanism and its collider signatures at the LHC

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 16 Mar 2017

Neutrino Masses and Dark Matter in Gauge Theories for Baryon and Lepton Numbers

Higgs-Radion Mixing in the RS and LHC Higgs-like Excesses

The Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry and New Interactions

Measurements of the W Boson Mass and Trilinear Gauge Boson Couplings at the Tevatron

Electroweak interactions of quarks. Benoit Clément, Université Joseph Fourier/LPSC Grenoble

Strongly coupled gauge theories: What can lattice calculations teach us?

Automatic CP Invariance and Flavor Symmetry

Physics at e + e - Linear Colliders. 4. Supersymmetric particles. M. E. Peskin March, 2002

Constraining New Models with Precision Electroweak Data

Heavy Quark Fragmentation to Baryons Containing Two Heavy Quarks*

Experimental Status and Expectations Regarding Radiative Penguin Decays

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 12 Feb 2001

On the Limits of Chiral Perturbation Theory

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 2 May 1997

Search for physics beyond the Standard Model at LEP 2

Lecture 10: Weak Interaction. 1

Beyond the Standard Model

Hadronic B decays from SCET

Measurement of Properties of Electroweak Bosons with the DØ Detector

Basics of Higgs Physics

Higgs Searches and Properties Measurement with ATLAS. Haijun Yang (on behalf of the ATLAS) Shanghai Jiao Tong University

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 4 Sep 1997

Transcription:

SSCL-Preprint-482 WIS-93/67/July-PH CMU-HEP93-10; DOE-ER/40682-35 February 7, 2008 arxiv:hep-ph/9307310v1 20 Jul 1993 Constraints on Extended Technicolor Models from B µ + µ X Benjamín Grinstein SSC Laboratory, 2550 Beckleymeade Ave., Dallas TX 75237 Yosef Nir Physics Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel and João M. Soares Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Abstract A recent study by Randall and Sundrum shows that models of Extended Technicolor (ETC) have interesting implications on rare B decays. We extend their study to the decay B µ + µ X. ETC models with a GIM mechanism predict a decay rate that is a factor of order 30 above the Standard Model, violating the experimental upper bound by a factor of 2 4. Traditional ETC models predict a decay rate that is a factor of order 4 above the Standard Model, and will be probed when an improvement in the sensitivity of experiments by a factor of order 2 4 is achieved.

In a recent paper, Randall and Sundrum [1] studied the contributions to the decays b sγ and B s µ + µ from various classes of Extended Technicolor (ETC) models. Models with and without a GIM mechanism were considered. In both cases, the radiative decay has roughly the same rate as in the Standard Model (SM). However, ETC contributions enhance the rate for B s µ + µ by one to two orders of magnitude. In this paper, we point out that a similar enhancement occurs for the decay b sµ + µ. This is particularly interesting because there exists an upper bound on this rate [2] which is only an order of magnitude above the SM rate and, furthermore, near term experiments are expected to further improve this bound [3]. In this brief note, we estimate BR(b sµ + µ ) in the two classes of ETC models discussed in ref. [1], and compare it to the present experimental upper bound. The first class of models considered in ref. [1], or traditional ETC models, contains the minimal set of interactions necessary for quark mass generation. (The study is restricted to models where neither composite nor fundamental scalars are involved in the quark mass generation.) It is this very minimal set of interactions that are considered in the generation of flavor changing neutral currents (FCNC). As such, it is safe to assume that predictions based on these can be considered as lower bounds. The caveat, of course, is the possibility of cancellations once additional interactions are incorporated. The rates that we find strongly deviate from the SM ones and, therefore, unless these additional cancellations are rather precise, one may conceivably rule out this class of models in the near future. The second class of models, those with a techni-gim mechanism, incorporate interactions beyond the minimal set of traditional models. They are theoretically appealing since, unlike traditional ETC, the massive vector bosons of the ETC interactions are nearly degenerate, with masses of a few TeV. Although these are rather light by traditional ETC standards, this class of models avoids many dangerous low energy FCNC interactions by incorporating an automatic techni-gim cancellation mechanism. In the absence of masses, the quark sector has a large SU(3) 3 flavor symmetry. If the only parameters that break this symmetry are the quark mass matrices (in the weak eigenstate basis), all of the flavor changing interactions must be proportional to them. Techni-GIM cancellations occur when one rotates to 1

the mass eigenstate basis. However, as we show below, this class of models seems to violate the existing bound on the rate for b sµ + µ. The flavor changing interactions that are induced at low energies by these classes of ETC models, and that are relevant for b sµ + µ, are [1] (i) the neutral current Z-boson coupling ξ (i) m t e Y u 33 Yu 32 s L γ µ b L Z µ, (1) 16πv cos θ W sin θ W which is present and of similar strength in traditional models and in models with a techni-gim mechanism, and (ii) the 4-fermion interaction ξ (ii) m t 33 4πv3Y u Yu 32 s Lγ µ b L µ L γ µ µ L, (2) which is highly suppressed in traditional models, but not in models with a techni-gim mechanism. Here, v = 246 GeV is the electroweak symmetry breaking scale. The coefficients ξ (i) and ξ (ii) are model-specific. The normalization of the matrix Y u is such that Yu 33 = 1. Following ref. [1], we take for our computations, as a rough estimate of the couplings, Yu 32 V ts, ξ (i) 1, and ξ (ii) 1 in models with a techni-gim, while ξ (ii) 1 in traditional models. The dominant ETC contributions to the decay Hamiltonian H eff = 2 2G F C j O j, (3) where are then j=8,9 O 8 = V ts (e 2 /16π 2 ) s L γ µ b L µγ µ µ, O 9 = V ts (e 2 /16π 2 ) s L γ µ b L µγ µ γ 5 µ, (4) C (i) 8 = C (i) 9 (1 4 sin 2 θ W ) C (i) 9 = ξ (i) m t /8vα QED, (5) C (ii) 8 = C (ii) 9 C (ii) 9 = ξ (ii) m t /4vα QED, (6) for the interactions (i) and (ii), respectively. There are no short distance QCD corrections to this effective Hamiltonian. More precisely, there is no multiplicative correction to C 8 since the FCNC is partially conserved. There are additive corrections [4] to C 8 that arise from mixing of the SM fourquark interaction into the operator O 8. Since the ETC contributions are 2

much larger than the SM ones, there are effectively no short distance QCD corrections. The differential rate dγ(b sµ + µ )/dx, where x = (p µ + + p µ ) 2 /m 2 B, is usually expressed in units Γ(b ce ν e ), in which case the dependence on CKM parameters drops out. The rate is given by [4] 1 Γ(b ce ν e ) dγ(b sµ+ µ )/dx = α 2 QED 4π 2 f(m c /m b ) (1 x)2 (1 + 2x)( C 8 2 + C 9 2 ) (7) (f(0.3) = 0.52 is a phase space factor) and is plotted in fig. 1, for m t = 160 GeV, for both type (i) and (ii) contributions. The SM result [4] is also given in the figure for comparison. Similar to the results of ref. [1] for the decay B s µ + µ, we find that the rate for b sµ + µ is enhanced, compared to the SM, by a factor of approximately 4 for type (i) interactions, and by a factor of approximately 30 for type (ii) interactions. The corresponding integrated rates are given in table 1 for various values of m t. They should be compared to the experimental upper bound [2]: BR(B µ + µ X) 5 10 5. We stress that these estimates are very rough since the precise values of the coefficients ξ (i) and ξ (ii) are not known. Moreover, the various contributions may interfere destructively. Fig. 1 shows that destructive interference could significantly reduce the rate. Nevertheless, it is unlikely that the resulting cancellations would be so fine-tuned as to reduce the rate down to a level close to that of the SM. Note that even the SM contribution could significantly reduce the total rate through destructive interference with ETC amplitudes. In ETC models that have a GIM mechanism, the 4-fermion interaction (ii) gives the dominant effect in b sµ + µ. Our results, given in table 1, imply that this type of ETC models are ruled out by experiment, unless the Z-exchange contribution from (i) adds destructively or if the various couplings of order one are somewhat suppressed compared to our naive estimates. An improvement of the experimental bound by a factor of a few would be sufficient to rule out that case too barring delicate cancellations or fine-tuning. For traditional models, the type (ii) interaction is highly suppressed and the rate is dominated by the type (i) interaction. The rate is lower than in the previous case by an order of magnitude, and is marginally 3

allowed by the current experimental upper limit. Again, it should be probed in the near future when on-going experiments at CLEO and the Tevatron derive a bound stronger than the present one by a factor of a few. Acknowledgements This work was initiated at the Workshop on B Physics at Hadron Accelerators (Snowmass, Colorado, June 1993). The authors are grateful to the organization for partial financial support. This work was also partly supported by the U. S. Department of Energy under Contracts No. DE-FG02-91ER40682 and DE AC35 89ER40486. YN is grateful to the theory group at CERN for their hospitality. YN is an incumbent of the Ruth E. Recu Career Development Chair and is supported, in part, by the Israel Commission for Basic Research and by the Minerva Foundation. References [1] L. Randall and R. Sundrum, preprint MIT-CTP-2211 (1993). [2] C. Albajar et al. (UA1 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B262 (1991) 163. [3] See, for example, report of the δ-working group in the proceedings of the Workshop on B-Physics in Hadron Accelerators (Snowmass 1993), to be published. [4] B. Grinstein, M. Savage and M. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B319 (1989) 271. 4

Figure Captions Figure 1: The differential decay rate dγ(b sµ + µ )/dx (x = (p µ + + p µ ) 2 /m 2 B ) due to the ETC interactions (i) and (ii) and in the SM, for m t = 160 GeV. Table Captions Table 1: The branching ratio for B µ + µ X in the SM, and that due to the ETC interactions (i) and (ii).

Table 1 m t /GeV SM (i) (ii) 130 3.5 10 6 1.5 10 5 1 10 4 160 5.1 10 6 2 10 5 1.5 10 4 190 7.4 10 6 3 10 5 2 10 4