Atmospheric Neutrinos MINOS MINOS Far Detector Type of Atmospheric Neutrinos at MINOS Two MINOS Atmospheric Analyses.

Similar documents
An Introduction to Modern Particle Physics. Mark Thomson University of Cambridge

MINOS. Physics Program and Construction Status. Karol Lang The University of Texas at Austin. YITP: Neutrinos and Implications for Physics Beyond

Latest results from MINOS

MINOS. Luke A. Corwin, for MINOS Collaboration Indiana University XIV International Workshop On Neutrino Telescopes 2011 March 15

Neutrinos & the MINOS Experiment

New Results for ν µ ν e oscillations in MINOS

MINOS experiment at Fermilab

The Multiple Muon Charge Ratio in MINOS Far Detector

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

New Results from the MINOS Experiment

First MINOS Results from the NuMI Beam

MINOS Oscillation Results from The First Year of NuMI Beam Operation

Long Baseline Neutrino Experiments

Anti-fiducial Muons in MINOS. Matthew Strait. University of Minnesota for the MINOS collaboration

Long Baseline Neutrinos

Neutrino mixing II. Can ν e ν µ ν τ? If this happens:

Neutrino Oscillation Results from MINOS

Neutrino Oscillations

Neutrino Oscillations

Upward Showering Muons in Super-Kamiokande

From Here to a Neutrino Factory: Neutrino Oscillations Now and Again

Neutrino interaction systematic errors in MINOS and NOvA

MiniBooNE Progress and Little Muon Counter Overview

arxiv: v3 [hep-ex] 24 Nov 2015

Atmospheric neutrinos

Measuring the neutrino mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos in IceCube(-Gen2)

SK Atmospheric neutrino. Choji Saji ICRR,Univ. of Tokyo for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration

PoS(NEUTEL2015)037. The NOvA Experiment. G. Pawloski University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

Analyzing Data. PHY310: Lecture 16. Road Map

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 2 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

Results from T2K. Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K

Results from the OPERA experiment in the CNGS beam

Application of GLoBES: GLACIER on conventional neutrino beams

The NOνA Experiment and the Future of Neutrino Oscillations

PHYS 5326 Lecture #2. Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu. Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 1 Oct 1998

So, you want to build a neutrino detector?

Neutrino Experiments with Reactors

Latest Results from the OPERA Experiment (and new Charge Reconstruction)

Correlated Background measurement in Double Chooz experiment

Neutrino Detectors for future facilities - III

Experimental results on the atmospheric muon charge ratio

Detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

Douglas Michael California Institute of Technology RPIA 2002 KEK, Oct. 29, 2002


K2K and T2K experiments

PoS(HEP2005)177. Status of the OPERA experiment. Francesco Di Capua. Universita Federico II and INFN.

Accelerator Neutrino Experiments News from Neutrino 2010 Athens

Neutrinos: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Stanley Wojcicki SLAC Summer Institute 2010 August 13, 2010

Solar and atmospheric ν s

RECENT RESULTS FROM THE OPERA EXPERIMENT

Super-Kamiokande ~The Status of n Oscillation ~

Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

SciBar and future K2K physics. F.Sánchez Universitat Aútonoma de Barcelona Institut de Física d'altes Energies

KamLAND. Introduction Data Analysis First Results Implications Future

Neutron background and possibility for shallow experiments

Search for Astrophysical Neutrino Point Sources at Super-Kamiokande

NEUTRINOS II The Sequel

A method for detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

NEW νe Appearance Results from the. T2K Experiment. Matthew Malek Imperial College London. University of Birmingham HEP Seminar 13 June 2012

Neutrino Physics: an Introduction

Chapter 2 The MINOS and MINOS+ Experiments

AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF NEUTRINO PHYSICS. Kate Scholberg, Duke University TASI 2008, Boulder, CO

An Underground Laboratory for a Multi-Detector Experiment. Karsten Heeger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Some Introduction Proto-Nubar Meeting 28/Feb/2006 Caius Howcroft 1

Detectors for astroparticle physics

The T2K experiment Results and Perspectives. PPC2017 Corpus Christi Mai 2017 Michel Gonin On behalf of the T2K collaboration

The Search for θ13 : First Results from Double Chooz. Jaime Dawson, APC

Existing and future long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments

1. Neutrino Oscillations

Observation of Reactor Antineutrinos at RENO. Soo-Bong Kim for the RENO Collaboration KNRC, Seoul National University March 29, 2012

Test of Non-Standard Interactions at Super-K

UNIT1: Experimental Evidences of Neutrino Oscillation Atmospheric and Solar Neutrinos

( Some of the ) Lateset results from Super-Kamiokande

Accelerator neutrino experiments

(a) (c)

PoS(Nufact08)003. Status and Prospects of Long Baseline ν Oscillation Experiments

The CNGS neutrino beam

The First Results of K2K long-baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment

PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY WITH SHOWERING UPWARD MUONS IN SUPER-KAMIOKANDE. SHANTANU DESAI Ph.D Final Oral Examination December 3 rd 2003

Super-KamiokaNDE: Beyond Neutrino Oscillations. A. George University of Pittsburgh

Neutrino Oscillation and CP violation

- ICARUS status and near future

Single π production in MiniBooNE and K2K

Status and Neutrino Oscillation Physics Potential of the Hyper-Kamiokande Project in Japan

Lessons from Neutrinos in the IceCube Deep Core Array

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 11 May 2017

Neutrino interaction at K2K

KM3NeT/ORCA. R. Bruijn University of Amsterdam/Nikhef. Phystat-Nu 2016 Tokyo

Latest Results from MINOS and MINOS+ Will Flanagan University of Texas on behalf of the MINOS+ Collaboration

Cosmic Ray Physics with the MINOS Detectors. Jeff de Jong Oxford Particle Seminar Feb 24, 2009

Atmospheric Neutrinos and Neutrino Oscillations

Available online at ScienceDirect. Physics Procedia 61 (2015 ) K. Okumura

Atmospheric muons & neutrinos in neutrino telescopes

HARP (Hadron Production) Experiment at CERN

fro m t h e MIN O S E x pe rim e n t

Perspectives of neutrino oscillation physics with long baseline beams

Neutrinos. Why measure them? Why are they difficult to observe?

Transcription:

Atmospheric Neutrinos MINOS MINOS Far Detector Type of Atmospheric Neutrinos at MINOS Two MINOS Atmospheric Analyses 1

Produced in the atmosphere from interactions of primary cosmic rays. p + N π ± + X p,he #,$ Zenith Down-! Detector % " Zenith π ± µ ± + ν µ ( ν µ ) µ ± e ± + ν e ( ν e ) + ν µ ( ν µ ). µ ( ) -!e ( ) - µ! ( ) -! µ " Up-! % #&" L ν e + ν e = 1/ ν µ + ν µ ν µ / ν µ 1 Detector Earth

First evidence of neutrino oscillations came from Super Kamiokande (1998). Number of Events Number of Events 600 500 400 300 00 0 Sub-GeV e-like 0-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 00 180 Multi-GeV e-like 160 140 10 0 80 60 40 0 0-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 cos! 600 500 400 300 00 0 350 300 50 00 150 0 Sub-GeV µ-like 0-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 50 up down Multi-GeV µ-like + PC 0-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 cos! ν μ ν τ OSCILLATIONS ( ) ( νµ cos θ sin θ = ν τ sin θ cos θ ) ( ν1 ν ) P (ν µ ν τ ) = sin θ sin (δm L/4E) 3

Demonstrate the oscillation behaviour Provide very high statistics discrimination against other models for neutrino disappearance, e.g. decoherence, neutrino decay,...? Measure 3 to better than % Search for sub dominate ν appearance e θ 13 3σ discovery limit is factor improvement on CHOOZ current limit. In addition: MINOS Far Detector capable of first direct observation of atmospheric ν and ν oscillations 4

(Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search) ν μ 735km Near (unosc) Far (oscillated) Depth of minimum sin θ Position of minimum Δm 5

MINOS Far Detector beam event 6

Located in former iron mine in northern Mn, USA. Also the home of Soudan1& (ret.) and CDMS. MINOS is 341 ft. (070 mwe) below the surface. shaft MINOS Soudan /CDMS II 7

8m octagonal steel scintillator tracking calorimeter. Two 15m sections (supermodules) 5.3 kton total mass. Each supermodule has a 1.5T toroidal magnetic field Hadronic energy resolution ~55%/ E A Completed in Aug 003. single supermodule 8

Steel-Scintillator sandwich, each layer (plane) consists of a.54 cm steel +1 cm scintillator Each scintillator plane divided into 19 x 4cm wide strips steel Alternate planes have orthogonal strip orientations, U and V 3D tracking U V U V U V U V scintillator orthogonal orientations of strips Scintillation light collected by fibres glued into each strip and read out by multi pixel PMTs 9

The Far Detector (3) v y u x The Far Detector during construction.

The Far Detector (4) The completed Far Detector. 11

Since completion in August 003 the Far Det has been taking cosmics data. Beam switched on 1st March 005 at which point the Far Detector had collected 40 days of physics quality data, excellent for a detector still in commissioning stage. Total live time 500 400 300 00 MINOS PRELIMINARY 0% live time live time Total of 5.99 kton-years of data suitable for atmospheric neutrino studies, c.f. Soudan 's 7.36 ktonyears 0 0 0 0 00 300 400 500 Days since 003-07-01 Will still take cosmics data during beam running. 1

Two Views (U-Z and V-Z) are combined to give 3D tracks and showers. Event timing information Calorimeteric information Event charge and muon momentum from curvature of tracks in B-field. UZ VZ Timing (.4 ns) Calorimetic DATA 13

ν MINOS Far Detector has a lot going for it: Deep (070 mwe) 0,000 reduction in cosmic muon and large. Magnetic field, event charge and muon momentum, even muons that leave the detector. Potential problem, 80% of the detector surface is uninstrumented. Hit in Veto Shield Event appears to start 1m from detector edge 14

Fully Contained FC ν µ Sneaky Stopping Cosmic Muons Cut: Containment, topology ν Partially Contained Downward-going PCDN µ Sneaky Thru-going Cosmic Muons Cut: Containment, topology Partially Contained upward-going PCUP µ Stopping Cosmic Muons (Direction Wrong) neutrino induced rock muon νinducedµ ν ν µ Cut: timing Thru-going Cosmic Muons (Direction wrong) Cut: timing 15

Look for events coming from below the horizon. The flat overburden at Soudan means can also look for events slightly above horizon. Event selection is based on event timing, timing resolution.4ns per channel. Require 0 planes and m tracks, look at event timing 1/β (c/v). Downward going cosmic ray muons Upward going events Select 91 events. B. Rebel (FNAL) 16

UZ VZ Timing µ + Timing 17

NUANCE Monte Carlo: Bartol'96 flux MC normalised to data Event Charge ID Use the charge of the muon to separate ν and ν events Efficiency is a function of, muon momentum, track length and vxb Charge ID is a work in process B. Rebel (FNAL) 18

FC and PC-Down have same background: sneaky cosmic muons. Therefore, use same cuts. Rejection factor of 1 in 7 required to achieve a signal to background ratio of :1. Use Monte Carlo signal (Barr et al.) and cosmic muon background to develop cuts based analysis to reduce signal: background to 1:1, then apply veto shield (~97% efficient). Use veto shield to measure remaining background in sample. 19

Define a fiducial volume: 0.5m from detector edge Events 6 5 MINOS PRELIMINARY Data ( livedays) Cosmic Muon MC 5 planes from each supermodule end 4 3 " µ CC MC! 00 Cuts: FC - require both ends be 'contained' PCDN - require upper end 'contained' and lower end non-contained. 0 0.5 1 1.5.5 3 3.5 4 Fiducial Distance / m Muons entering through coil hole. Removed with 40cm radial cut. Signal:Cosmic ~ 1:300 0

Background dominated by steep cosmic ray muons Cut out sneaky muons Δ z Events 3 MINOS PRELIMINARY data MC cosmic µ MC atmos " 1-1 0 0. 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1. 1.4 1.6 Signal:Cosmic ~ 1:15! Z / m 1

Remaining background is steep, highly curving cosmic ray muons Deposit lots of charge in first plane (Q vtx) / PE Q vtx MC atmos " 300 50 00 / PE Q vtx MC cosmic µ 300 50 00 150 0 50 0 0 0.1 0. 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 cos! z 150 0 50 0 0 0.1 0. 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 cos! z y (zenith) / PE Q vtx MC atmos " 300 50 00 150 0 / PE Q vtx MC cosmic µ 300 50 00 150 0 z 50 0-1 -0.8-0.6-0.4-0. 0 0. 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 cos! zenith 50 0-1 -0.8-0.6-0.4-0. 0 0. 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 cos! zenith

Define 'steep' to be: cos θ zenith > 0.7 or cos θ z < 0.5 Then require Qvtx<0 Events 00 180 160 140 10 0 80 60 40 0 cos# zenith >0.7, cos# z <0.5 Data MC cosmic µ MC atmos "! MINOS PRELIMINARY 0 0 50 0 150 00 50 300 Signal:Cosmic ~ 1:1.5 Q vtx /PE 3

FC/PCDN:Veto Shield Added after detector construction, rather odd shape due to readout cables. Event so: 99.9% acceptance. Same scintillator strips used in detector, but parallel to Z axis. 4 sections ( per supermodule) each 8 meters long. East West B-Field Y V U Coil hole Shield Layer X Z out of page 4

An event is 'vetoed' if energy is deposited in the shield with 0ns of the event. Measure veto shield efficiency using steep stopping cosmic ray muons. Veto Efficiency = 97.1±0.(sys) % The signal rejection is dominated by shield noise: Signal Inefficiency =.5±0.(sys) % 5

Applying veto shield: Data Total MC (no oscillations) Total MC (Δm =0.005eV ) Total 94 10.1±4.0 94.3±18.9 PCDN 5.6±4.3 0.5±4.1 FC 69 98.5±19.7 73.8±14.8 MC predictions include all backgrounds Know veto shield efficiency and number of vetoed events, therefore can estimate cosmic ray muon background in selected sample. Measured Cosmic Muon BG MC Cosmic Muon BG Events 4.4±0.4(stat)±0.3(sys) 4.9±0.5(stat)±0.7(sys) 6

Very different backgrounds to FC/PCDN. Stopping cosmic ray muons with incorrect direction from timing, therefore timing cuts do the work here. However still need a containment and a Δz cut to remove upgoing neutrino induced muons (reduced to 1% of signal) Signal:BG ~ 1:15 7

Direction of track is determined from timing of hits along its length. The rms of the hits times about the track is calculated for the two hypotheses of +c or -c. The hypothesis with smallest rms is selected as track direction. +c hypothesis +c hypothesis 8

Use difference in RMS to selected events with good timing MINOS PRELIMINARY data MC cosmic µ MC atmos! 1-1 - -9-8 -7-6 -5-4 -3 - -1 0 RMS up - RMS down / ns Remaining background is estimated from high statistics Monte Carlo studies <0.36 (68% c.f.). A x-check is made by extrapolating data distribution into signal region giving 0.5 events. Data Total MC (no oscillations) Total MC (0.005eV ) Events 13 19.3±3.9.7±.1 9

Summary of selected events Data MC ν µ /ν µ CC no oscillations MC ν µ /ν µ CC 0.005eV Cosmic Muon MC Other Backgrounds Total 7 18.9±5.8 93.5±19 4.9±0.7 5.6±1.1 Barr et al flux. Sys error dominated by (flux and cross-section) Assumes no oscillations Other Backgrounds: ν τ CC Rock muons ν e CC Neutral Current 30

FC PCDN PCUP 31

Define a 'high resolution' sample for FC events, by applying similar timing cuts to PCUP. Place 30 events into a 'low resolution' sample which have an ambiguous direction. Correct Track Direction Before Cut = 96.0 % After Cut = 99.9 % FC events 3

Events 30 5 0 Data MC null oscillations MC " m 3 = 0.005 ev MC Background MINOS PRELIMINARY 15 5 0-1 -0.8-0.6-0.4-0. 0 0. 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 cos! zenith For high-resolution events can calculate the up-down ratio (R obs ) and compare it to MC expectation in the absence of oscillations (R MC ). R obs /R MC = 0.6±0.15(stat)±0.03(sys) 33

Measure charge from curvature of track in magnetic field. Track length Muon momentum vxb Require that Q/P / σ Q/P >.0 5000 0000 15000 000 5000 Stopping cosmic ray muons Data + MC µ - MC µ - + MC µ + µ MINOS PRELIMINARY μ - μ + agreement. Good data/mc 0-0 -15 - -5 0 5 15 0 Q/P/! Q/P 34

ν ν ν/ν Data 34 18 55 MC (no oscillations) MC (0.005 ev ) Charge Purity = 98.7% 45.6±8.9 4.9±4.7 68.5±14 33.8±6.6 18.7±3.4 51.9± Events 4 0 18 16 14 1 8 6 4 0 - -8-6 -4-0 4 6 8 Data MC Expectation (no oscillations) MC Expectation ("m =0.005 ev MC background MINOS PRELIMINARY ) Q/P/! Q/P N+/N- = 0.53±0.15(stat)±0.0(sys) Expected N+/N- = 0.55 35

Events 30 5 MINOS PRELIMINARY Events 30 5 Data MC nill oscil " µ 0 15 " µ 0 15 MC (#m =0.005 ev ) MC background 5 5 0-1 -0.8-0.6-0.4-0. 0 0. 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 cos! zenith 0-1 -0.8-0.6-0.4-0. 0 0. 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 cos! zenith R obs /R MC ν ν 0.7±0.35(stat)±0.03(sys) 0.83±0.9(stat)±0.03(sys) 36

MINOS has collected 5.99 kton-years of cosmic data before beam switched on in March 005. Have observed a total of 198 atmospheric neutrino events, 7 contained vertex and 91 upward-going muons. Contained event up-down ratio excludes no oscillations to.5σ. Contained events can be charged id'ed with 98% purity. Measured N+/N- = 0.53±0.15(stat)±0.0(sys), c.f. expectation 0.55. No enough statistics yet to make any statement about charge separated oscillation parameters. Acknowledgements: A. Blake, J. Chapman, B. Rebel and M. Thomson 37

`Thus I descended from the first circle down into the second, which girdles less space, and so much more woe that it goads to wailing. There abides Minos horribly, and snarls; he examines the sins at the entrance; he judges, and he sends according as he entwines himself.' Dante Alighieri - Divina Commedia Gustave Dore

/ ev 3 m!! -3 m -1 - = 0.005 ev,! m = 0.005 ev MINOS PRELIMINARY ) (ev!+!m - MINOS PRELIMINARY 90% 68% 99% -3-4 90% C.L. 95% C.L. Input Value -5-5 -4-3 - FC Expected! m 3-1 / ev -4-4 -3 -!m!- upmu Expected (ev ) -1 39

Can accommodate LSND, solar and atmos results with CPT violation giving different masses for neutrino and antineutrino. Use a none zero theta 13 component to measure sign of deltam "Because it's there." - George Mallory, 194 40