Professor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 2 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley

Similar documents
Professor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley

Professor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 4 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley. control input. error Controller D(s)

Chapter 2 SDOF Vibration Control 2.1 Transfer Function

Transient Response of a Second-Order System

8 sin 3 V. For the circuit given, determine the voltage v for all time t. Assume that no energy is stored in the circuit before t = 0.

Introduction to Controls

Dr Ian R. Manchester

2.010 Fall 2000 Solution of Homework Assignment 7

Transform Solutions to LTI Systems Part 3

(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:

Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review

EE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 9 Solutions. HW 9 Solutions. 10(s + 3) s(s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =

Lab Experiment 2: Performance of First order and second order systems

EE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014

Analysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain

If you need more room, use the backs of the pages and indicate that you have done so.

Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014

AMJAD HASOON Process Control Lec4.

Problem Set 3: Solution Due on Mon. 7 th Oct. in class. Fall 2013

EE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 6.2 Solutions. HW 6.2 Solutions

School of Engineering Faculty of Built Environment, Engineering, Technology & Design

100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =

ECEN 420 LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS. Lecture 6 Mathematical Representation of Physical Systems II 1/67

2.4 Harmonic Oscillator Models

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

2.4 Models of Oscillation

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad

EE102 Homework 2, 3, and 4 Solutions

MAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008

Control Systems. University Questions

EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 1 Solution (Fall 2010) Wenjie Chen and Jansen Sheng, UC Berkeley

ME scope Application Note 28

Laplace Transform Analysis of Signals and Systems

Software Engineering 3DX3. Slides 8: Root Locus Techniques

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Course roadmap. Step response for 2nd-order system. Step response for 2nd-order system

Lecture 1 Root Locus

PID controllers. Laith Batarseh. PID controllers

Review: control, feedback, etc. Today s topic: state-space models of systems; linearization

Inductance, RL and RLC Circuits

The next two questions pertain to the situation described below. Consider a parallel plate capacitor with separation d:

'XNH8QLYHUVLW\ (GPXQG73UDWW-U6FKRRORI(QJLQHHULQJ. EGR 224 Spring Test II. Michael R. Gustafson II

University of Alberta ENGM 541: Modeling and Simulation of Engineering Systems Laboratory #7. M.G. Lipsett & M. Mashkournia 2011

S I X SOLUTIONS TO CASE STUDIES CHALLENGES. Antenna Control: Stability Design via Gain K s s s+76.39K. T(s) =

EE C128 / ME C134 Midterm Fall 2014

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall K(s +1)(s +2) G(s) =.

Notes for ECE-320. Winter by R. Throne

Professor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 10 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley

In the presence of viscous damping, a more generalized form of the Lagrange s equation of motion can be written as

First and Second Order Circuits. Claudio Talarico, Gonzaga University Spring 2015

ET3-7: Modelling II(V) Electrical, Mechanical and Thermal Systems

Basic Procedures for Common Problems

VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 5

PES 1120 Spring 2014, Spendier Lecture 35/Page 1

ME 375 EXAM #1 Friday, March 13, 2015 SOLUTION

CHAPTER 1 Basic Concepts of Control System. CHAPTER 6 Hydraulic Control System

EE313 Fall 2013 Exam #1 (100 pts) Thursday, September 26, 2013 Name. 1) [6 pts] Convert the following time-domain circuit to the RMS Phasor Domain.

EE 3CL4: Introduction to Control Systems Lab 4: Lead Compensation

Review: transient and steady-state response; DC gain and the FVT Today s topic: system-modeling diagrams; prototype 2nd-order system

Time Response Analysis (Part II)

P114 University of Rochester NAME S. Manly Spring 2010

NPTEL Online Course: Control Engineering

Chapter 10 AC Analysis Using Phasors

Discrete Systems. Step response and pole locations. Mark Cannon. Hilary Term Lecture

1 (30 pts) Dominant Pole

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING

Inductance, Inductors, RL Circuits & RC Circuits, LC, and RLC Circuits

Systems Analysis and Control

9.5 The Transfer Function

MODELING OF CONTROL SYSTEMS

(a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: G(s) =

APPPHYS 217 Tuesday 6 April 2010

ECE557 Systems Control

Modeling and Experimentation: Mass-Spring-Damper System Dynamics

Dynamics of structures

Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL

Module 3F2: Systems and Control EXAMPLES PAPER 2 ROOT-LOCUS. Solutions

Appendix A: Exercise Problems on Classical Feedback Control Theory (Chaps. 1 and 2)

Computer Problems for Methods of Solving Ordinary Differential Equations

ECEN 605 LINEAR SYSTEMS. Lecture 20 Characteristics of Feedback Control Systems II Feedback and Stability 1/27

Given: We are given the drawing above and the assumptions associated with the schematic diagram.

Linear Systems Theory

Practice Exam 1. Necessary Constants and Equations: Electric force (Coulomb s Law): Electric field due to a point charge:

Time Response of Systems

'XNH8QLYHUVLW\ (GPXQG73UDWW-U6FKRRORI(QJLQHHULQJ. EGR 224 Spring Test II. Michael R. Gustafson II

EE221 Circuits II. Chapter 14 Frequency Response

Homework 7 - Solutions

Unit 2: Modeling in the Frequency Domain Part 2: The Laplace Transform. The Laplace Transform. The need for Laplace

Imaginary. Axis. Real. Axis

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Control and Dynamical Systems

Table of Laplacetransform

Topic # Feedback Control Systems

C R. Consider from point of view of energy! Consider the RC and LC series circuits shown:

Imaginary. Axis. Real. Axis

Positioning Servo Design Example

Introduction to Root Locus. What is root locus?

University of California, Berkeley Department of Mechanical Engineering ME 104, Fall Midterm Exam 1 Solutions

Some of the different forms of a signal, obtained by transformations, are shown in the figure. jwt e z. jwt z e

Transcription:

Professor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 2 Solution Fall 21 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley 1. (15 pts) Partial fraction expansion (review) Find the inverse Laplace transform of the following function using partial fraction expansion: (s 2 +2s+2)(s+1) (1) The partial fraction expansion is: (s 2 +2s+2)(s+1) as+b s 2 +2s+2 + c s+1 (2) (as+b)(s+1)+c(s 2 +2s+2) (3) Solving for the unknowns, we get a 2, b 3, c 2. Now we can divide up our fractions into familiar inverse Laplace transforms: 2s+3 s 2 +2s+2 + 2 s+1 2(s+1) (s+1) 2 +1 2 + 1 (s+1) 2 +1 2 + 2 s+1 (4) Finally, take the inverse Laplace transform: Note: You could also divide the fraction into three terms (2cost+sint 2)e t u(t) (5) (s 2 +2s+2)(s+1) a s+1 i + b s+1+i + c s+1, (6) and then continue to solve for the inverse Laplace transform from here and you would get the same result. 2. (15 pts) Equivalent models (review) For the mechanical circuit below, a. Write the differential equations describing the system s motion. b. Write the dynamic equations in state space form ẋ Ax+Bu, with input u F. c. Draw the equivalent electrical circuit, using F V and v i equivalances. M1 M2 F x1 K1 x2 K2 a. The system can be divided into two mass spring subsystems M1, K1 and M2, K2 with a force source attached. The dynamics of the first subsystem would be: The dynamics of the second subsystem would be: We can rearrange these equations into: F ẍ 1 +K 1 (x 1 x 2 ) (7) K 1 (x 1 x 2 ) M 2 ẍ 2 +K 2 x 2 (8) ẍ 1 1 ( K 1 x 1 +K 1 x 2 +F) ẍ 2 1 M 2 (K 1 x 1 (K 1 +K 2 )x 2 ) (9)

b. To write these equations into state space form, we need to use one variable for each derivative below the highest. In this case, we could use x [x 1 ẋ 1 x 2 ẋ 2 ] as our state (or a variety of other possibilities but this one is simple/standard). ẋ Ax+Bu 1 K1 K 1 M 2 K 1 1 K1+K2 M 2 x+ 1 F (1) c. To draw the equivalent circuit, remember that mechanical elements in parallel will have the same current in the circuit and mechanical elements connected in series will have the same voltage. This means that the inductor and capacitor corresponding to M2 and K2 will have the same velocity/current (in series). K1 separates M1 and the M2K2 subsystem so there will be a capacitor corresponding to K1 in between the two. The force source becomes a voltage source in parallel with everything. 3. (2 pts) 2nd order step response A memory system can be made using a mechanical head positioning system to read data stored on a surface.the head positioning system can be approximately modelled by the transfer function from applied force F(s) to output position X(s): X(s) F(s) 1 ms 2 +bs+k Assume that m 1 9 kg, b 4 1 6 N sec m 1 and k 1 1 N m 1. a) Find the pole locations and sketch in the s-plane, and find ζ, ω n, θ sin 1 ζ, and ω d. b) For a 1 mn step, determine peak overshoot (µm), time to peak, and time for settling to within 1 µm of final value. c) Repeat b) for 1 µn step. a. The pole locations are the roots of the denominator, ms 2 + bs + k. These poles are given by the quadratic formula: X(s) F(s) 1 ms 2 +bs+k 1 k/m m(k/m) s 2 (11) +bs/m+k/m b± b 2 4mk 2m ( 2±j4 6) 1 3 (12) To solve for the values ζ, ω n, θ sin 1 ζ, and ω d, we can use the equations from FPE P111. s σ±jω d ( 2±j4 6) 1 3 σ 2 1 3 (13) ω n 1 9 k/m 1 14 rad/s ζ σ 2 1 3 1 4.2 ω n ω d ω n 1 ζ2 4 6 1 3 9.798 1 3 rad/s θ sin 1 ζ sin 1 (.2).214 11.537 (14)

b. The characteristics for a step response of a second order system are given in FPE P117. Since we are given a scaled step response (with magnitude 1 mn), the response will be scaled by both the input 1 mn and normalization factor 1/k. The peak overshoot is given by The time to peak is M p e πtanθ 1 3 1 e πζ/ 1 ζ 2 1 2 e π.2/ 1.2 2 1 2 5266µm (15) And the time for settling to within 1µm is t p π π ω d 4.326ms (16) 6 13 e ζωnts e.2ts 14 1 6 1 3 (1) 1 4 (17) t s 4.65ms (18) c. The response for a 1 µn step would have the same characteristics as in part b) but a different peak overshoot in µm (but same percentage) and different time for settling to 1 µm because the settling time is dependent on the percentage of the final value. M p e πtanθ 1 1 6 1 e πζ/ 1 ζ 2 1 4 e π.2/ 1.2 2 1 4 52.66µm (19) t p π π ω d 4.326ms (2) 6 13 And the time for settling to within 1µm (the response is scaled by both the input 1 µn and normalization factor 1/k) is 1 6 e ζωnts e.2ts 14 1 1 6 (1) 1 2 (21) t s 2.33ms (22)

4. (25 pts) Stabilty - Routh Array The closed loop transfer function of a system is given by What is the range of K for stability? H(s) Ks+4s s 4 +4s 3 +Ks 2 +4s+1 (23) The characteristic equation for this closed-loop system is The Routh array for this polynomial is a(s) s 4 +4s 3 +Ks 2 +4s+1 (24) s 4 1 K 1 s 3 4 4 s 2 4K 4 1 4 1 K 4 K 1 4 1 s 1 4() 4 1 4 4 s (4 4 )1 () 4 4 1 (25) For stability, the following conditions need to be satisfied K 1 > 4 4 K 1 > K > 2 (26) 5. (25 pts) Linearization A capacitive actuator has force given by F (d V 2 o x 1) where d o is the nominal capacitor plate gap, A is plate area, and V is applied voltage. The capacitive actuator has mass M and has a return spring with non-linear stiffness F k kx 3 1 and can be modelled as shown below. a. Write the dynamic equations in state space form ẋ f(x,u), with x 1 and ẋ 1 as the states. b. Write the dynamic equations in state space form ẋ Ax+Bu for the system linearized about a non-zero operating point V V o, x 1 x o, and x 2 ẋ 1. M F x 1 k a. The forces applied on the mass M are the actuator force F and the spring force F k. Application of Newton s Law yields Mẍ 1 F F k Mẍ 1 (d o x 1 ) V 2 kx 3 1 (27) Define the state as x [x 1 x 2 ] T [x 1 ẋ 1 ] T and the input as u V. Then ẋ ] [ [ẋ1 ẋ 2 k M x3 1 + x 2 M(d V 2 x 1) ] : [ ] f1 (x,u) f 2 (x,u) ẋ f(x,u) (28) b. The equilibrium point in this system is given as V V o, x 1 x o, and x 2 ẋ 1. Linearizing the system about this equilibrium point and input voltage yields ẋ Ax+Bu, where

A B [ f1 x 1 f 1 x 2 f 2 f 2 x 1 x 2 [ f1 ] u f 2 u x,ẋ,v ] [ ] [ ] 1 1 k M 3x2 1 + M(d x,ẋ x 1) V 2 k 2,V x,ẋ,v M 3x2 + M(d x ) V 2 2 [ ] [ ] (29) M(d 2V 2V x 1) M(d x ) x,ẋ,v