Turbulence Dispersion Force Physics, Model Derivation and Evaluation

Similar documents
DEVELOPMENT OF A MULTIPLE VELOCITY MULTIPLE SIZE GROUP MODEL FOR POLY-DISPERSED MULTIPHASE FLOWS

Investigation of Three-Dimensional Upward and Downward Directed Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Bubbly Flows in a 180 o -Bent Tube

Validation of Multiphase Flow Modeling in ANSYS CFD

CFD-Modeling of Boiling Processes

Euler-Euler Modeling of Mass-Transfer in Bubbly Flows

ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS OF A TWO-FLUID MULTI-FIELD HYDRODYNAMIC MODEL FOR CHURN-TURBULENT FLOWS

Modeling of Wall-boiling Phenomena from Nucleate Subcooled Boiling up to CHF Conditions

EXPERIMENTS AND NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HORIZONTAL TWO PHASE FLOW REGIMES

Multiphase Flow Modeling & Simulation with Application to Water-Vapor Flows Through Fuel Rod Bundles of Nuclear Reactors

HYDRODYNAMIC MODELING OF MINERAL WOOL FIBER SUSPENSIONS IN A TWO-DIMENSIONAL FLOW

Development and Validation of the Wall Boiling Model in ANSYS CFD

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SUDDEN-EXPANSION PARTICLE-LADEN FLOWS USING THE EULERIAN LAGRANGIAN APPROACH. Borj Cedria, 2050 Hammam-Lif, Tunis.

CFD modelling of multiphase flows

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN

MODELLING OF MULTIPHASE FLOWS

Buoyancy driven turbulent flow and experimental validation at the VeMix test facility

Computational Fluid Dynamics 2

DEVELOPMENT OF A NUMERICAL APPROACH FOR SIMULATION OF SAND BLOWING AND CORE FORMATION

Prediction of Convective Boiling up to Critical Heat Flux (CHF) Conditions for Test Facilities with Vertical Heaters

Silica deposition in superheated geothermal systems

A Coupled VOF-Eulerian Multiphase CFD Model To Simulate Breaking Wave Impacts On Offshore Structures

Numerical study of stochastic particle dispersion using One-Dimensional-Turbulence

Computational model for particle deposition in turbulent gas flows for CFD codes

NUMERICAL PREDICTIONS OF DEPOSTION WITH A PARTICLE CLOUD TRACKING TECHNIQUE

Strategy in modelling irregular shaped particle behaviour in confined turbulent flows

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATIONS FOR INSULATION PARTICLE TRANSPORT PHENOMENA IN WATER FLOW

Modelling of Break-up and Coalescence in Bubbly Two-Phase Flows

The effect of momentum flux ratio and turbulence model on the numerical prediction of atomization characteristics of air assisted liquid jets

CFD analysis of the transient flow in a low-oil concentration hydrocyclone

Boundary layer flows The logarithmic law of the wall Mixing length model for turbulent viscosity

CFD SIMULATION OF INDUSTRIAL BUBBLE COLUMNS: NUMERICAL AND MODELLING CHALLENGES AND SUCCESSES

CFD SIMULATIONS OF SINGLE AND TWO-PHASE MIXING PROESSES IN STIRRED TANK REACTORS

6. Laminar and turbulent boundary layers

Modeling Complex Flows! Direct Numerical Simulations! Computational Fluid Dynamics!

Laboratory of Thermal Hydraulics. General Overview

Design Of An Anisokinetic Probe For Sampling RadioactiveParticles From Ducts Of Nuclear Facilities

BUOYANCY DRIVEN MIXING STUDIES OF NATURAL CIRCULATION FLOWS AT THE ROCOM FACILITY USING THE ANSYS CFX CODE

J.-M. Laviéville EDF - Fluid Dynamics Power Generation Environment, 6 quai Watier, Chatou, France,

Eulerian model for the prediction of nucleate boiling of refrigerant in heat exchangers

Multiphase Flows. Mohammed Azhar Phil Stopford

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SLUG FLOW REGIME FOR AN AIR-WATER TWO-PHASE FLOW IN HORIZONTAL PIPES

6.2 Governing Equations for Natural Convection

Numerical Study of Oil Flow in Tee Junction with Leaks

Developments and Applications of TRACE/CFD Model of. Maanshan PWR Pressure Vessel

Numerical Simulation of Elongated Fibres in Horizontal Channel Flow

Fundamentals of Fluid Dynamics: Elementary Viscous Flow

A Momentum Exchange-based Immersed Boundary-Lattice. Boltzmann Method for Fluid Structure Interaction

CFD Simulation of Sodium Boiling in Heated Pipe using RPI Model

MODELLING OF BASIC PHENOMENA OF AEROSOL AND FISSION PRODUCT BEHAVIOR IN LWR CONTAINMENTS WITH ANSYS CFX

Computer Fluid Dynamics E181107

Effects of Two-Phase Flow in a Multistage Centrifugal Compressor

Performance characteristics of turbo blower in a refuse collecting system according to operation conditions

Numerical Simulation of the Gas-Liquid Flow in a Square Crosssectioned

Topics in Other Lectures Droplet Groups and Array Instability of Injected Liquid Liquid Fuel-Films

Fine-mesh multiphysics of LWRs: two-phase flow challenges and opportunities

CFD SIMULATION OF SOLID-LIQUID STIRRED TANKS

Measuring microbubble clustering in turbulent flow

FLOW MEASUREMENT. INC 102 Fundamental of Instrumentation and Process Control 2/2560

BAE 820 Physical Principles of Environmental Systems

Modeling of Humidification in Comsol Multiphysics 4.4

INFLUENCE OF JOULE THOMPSON EFFECT ON THE TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION IN VERTICAL TWO PHASE FLOW

Effect of Different Oil Droplet Sizes in a Flow of Natural Gas around a Compressor

Inter-phase heat transfer and energy coupling in turbulent dispersed multiphase flows. UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, UMR 7190, Paris, F-75005, France a)

CHAPTER 3 MODELLING AND ANALYSIS OF THE PACKED COLUMN

Development of a consistent and conservative Eulerian - Eulerian algorithm for multiphase flows

Turbulence Modeling I!

AGAT 2016, Cargèse a point-vortex toy model

The Turbulent Rotational Phase Separator

Introduction to Turbulence and Turbulence Modeling

PARTICLE DISPERSION IN ENCLOSED SPACES USING A LAGRANGIAN MODEL

ACCOUNTING FOR NON-EQUILIBRIUM TURBULENT FLUCTUATIONS IN THE EULERIAN TWO-FLUID MODEL BY MEANS OF THE NOTION OF INDUCTION PERIOD

Study on residence time distribution of CSTR using CFD

Manhar Dhanak Florida Atlantic University Graduate Student: Zaqie Reza

COMPUTATIONAL STUDY OF PARTICLE/LIQUID FLOWS IN CURVED/COILED MEMBRANE SYSTEMS

Simulating Interfacial Tension of a Falling. Drop in a Moving Mesh Framework

CFD in COMSOL Multiphysics

INTERACTION OF AN AIR-BUBBLE DISPERSED PHASE WITH AN INITIALLY ISOTROPIC TURBULENT FLOW FIELD

Model of Argon Flow through UTN

NUMERICAL STUDY OF TURBULENT CHANNEL FLOW LADEN WITH FINITE-SIZE NON-SPHERICAL PARTICLES

APPLICATION OF RPI MODEL: PREDICTION OF SUBCOOLED BOILING AND DNB IN VERTICAL PIPES

THERMAL HYDRAULIC REACTOR CORE CALCULATIONS BASED ON COUPLING THE CFD CODE ANSYS CFX WITH THE 3D NEUTRON KINETIC CORE MODEL DYN3D

INVESTIGATION OF THE PWR SUBCHANNEL VOID DISTRIBUTION BENCHMARK (OECD/NRC PSBT BENCHMARK) USING ANSYS CFX

CHARACTERISTIC OF VORTEX IN A MIXING LAYER FORMED AT NOZZLE PITZDAILY USING OPENFOAM

Modelling the influence of the nozzle geometry on the primary breakup of diesel jets

SIEVE TRAY EFFICIENCY USING CFD MODELING AND SIMULATION

Masters in Mechanical Engineering Aerodynamics 1 st Semester 2015/16

Mixing and Evaporation of Liquid Droplets Injected into an Air Stream Flowing at all Speeds

Best Practice Guidelines for Combustion Modeling. Raphael David A. Bacchi, ESSS

Fluid Mechanics 3502 Day 1, Spring 2018

The dispersion of a light solid particle in high-reynolds number homogeneous stationary turbulence: LES approach with stochastic sub-grid model

Transient Fluid Flow and Inclusion Motion in the Mold Using LES Models

The Effect of Endplates on Rectangular Jets of Different Aspect Ratios

Getting started: CFD notation

Process Chemistry Toolbox - Mixing

On the numerical study of isothermal vertical bubbly flow using two population balance approaches

Computational fluid dynamics study of flow depth in an open Venturi channel for Newtonian fluid

NUMERICAL MODELING OF THE GAS-PARTICLE FLUID FLOW AND HEAT TRANSFER IN THE SLIP REGIME

Momentum, energy and scalar transport in polydisperse gas-solid flows using particle-resolved direct numerical simulations

Numerical Modeling of Sampling Airborne Radioactive Particles Methods from the Stacks of Nuclear Facilities in Compliance with ISO 2889

Numerical Modelling of Twin-screw Pumps Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics

Transcription:

Turbulence Dispersion Force Physics, Model Derivation and Evaluation J.-M. Shi, T. Frank, A. Burns 3 Institute of Safety Research, FZ Rossendorf shi@fz-rossendorf.de ANSYS CFX Germany 3 ANSYS CFX FZR ANSYS CFX Workshop on Multiphase Flow 9-3.6.4, Dresden FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM ROSSENDORF Institut für Sicherheitsforschung

Contents Physics Modeling approaches Eulerian approach Lagrangian approach A new model derivations Evaluation

Turbulent dispersion (TD A result of the (dispersed phase particle eddy (continuous phase interaction Important for dispersed phase with small St Turbulent mass diffusion (α k u k and interphase momentum transfer Turbulent mass diffusion is usually modeled by a mass diffusion term The interphase momentum transfer due to turbulent dispersion is often separated as an interfacial force, to be calculated from the temperal correlation of the interfacial force fluctuations. Usually, only the drag contribution is essential.

Eulerian model mass diffusion Reynolds averaging t (ρ kα k + (ρ k α k U k = applying φ = φ + φ ( t (ρ kα k + (ρ k α k U k = (ρ k α k u k with α k u k ν k,t α k ( σ k Adopting Favré-averaged velocity Ũ k = α ku k α k = U k + α k u k (3 α k U k = Ũ k + u k + u k, u k = α k u k α k (4 t (ρ kα k + (ρ k α k Ũ k = (5 Using Favré-averaged velocity simplifies the equation system 3

Eulerian model turbulent dispersion force The Favré-Averaged Drag Force (FAD model, Drag: F D = C fp (U p U f = 8 C Dρ f U p U f }{{} D fp 6 α f d p }{{} A fp (U p U f (6 Reynolds averaging: F D = C fp (Ũp Ũ f + FTD (7 F TD = C fp α f u f α f α pu f EDH ν f,t C fp α p σ f ( αp α f α p α f (8 For details refer to A. Burns, T. Frank, I. Hamill and J.-M. Shi, ICMF4, Paper No. 39 4

Lagrangian method tracking trajectories of each particle, parcel V n+ p δt V n p = x n+ p = x n p + Vn pδt (9 ρ n f C D V p V 4ρ p d f (V p V f + p ρ p δv F other ( ( 3 construct fluid fluctuating velocity for particle-eddy interaction V n+ f = U f (x n+ p, t + v n+ f, v n+ f = av n f + ben, where ( a = exp ( δt T L, b = ( kf 3 a, e n N(, ( P n+ F n+ p Lagrangian time step P n = F n F n+ Eulerian time step 5

A new TD force model derivation ( Ensemble average for a cell V at time t j F D (t j = V n(t j i= f i D (t j = V n(t j i= 3 4 ρ f C i D d i p V i p Vi f (Vi p Vi f δv i (3 Time averaged drag F D = V T E N j= N n(t j i= 3 4 ρ f C i D d i p V i p Vi f (Vi p Vi f δv i δt (4 T E (macro time scale τ e = C k ǫ (eddy life time; δt τ e n(t N n(t j n(t n(t j n(t N V t N = t T E / t j = t jδt t = t t j = t + jδt t N = t + T E / 6

Model derivation ( Converting into the Eulerian frame Eulerian variables α p (t j = V n(t j i= δv i (5 Φ(t j = n(t j i= Φi δv i = n(t j i= δv i V n(t j i= Φi δv i α p (t j (6 Reynolds averaging operator Φ(t = T E t+te / t T E / Φ(θdθ = T E N j= N Φ(t j δt (7 Averaging the drag force F D = α p f D = α p f }{{ D + α } pf }{{ D} mean drag turbulent dispersion force (8 7

Derivation details ( F D = 3 4 ρ f 3 4 ρ C D f U p U d f ( U p U f αp p C D d p } {{ } D ( U p U f αp ( Up U f = D U p U f ( α p U p α p U f = D U p U f = D U p U f ( α p Ũ p α p U f α pu f α p (Ũp Ũ f + αp α f u f = Dα p U p U f ( Ũ p Ũ f + D Up U f ( αp α f α pu f α f α f u f α pu f } {{ } turbulent dispersion force F TD (9 8

Derivation details ( Eddy viscosity hypothesis (EVH α u f = ν f,t α u σ f = ν f,t α ( f σ f α Model expression (for the continuous phase C D F TD 3 4 ρ ν f,t f U p U d p σ f } f {{} C TD ( α p α p α f α f ( Results for two-fluid model, α p + α f = F TD 3 4 ρ f C D d p ν f,t σ f U p U f α p α f ( 9

Remarks The present derivation illustrates the physics of the turbulent dispersion The present derivation explains why double average makes sense Lagrangian evaluation of turbulent dispersion is very expensive. This derivation might provide a theoretical foundation for a deterministic TD force model for the Lagrangian solver

Evaluation

FZR MTLoop test facility Air-water system, isothermal Inner pipe diameter D = 5. mm Wire mesh sensor measurements Test section from gas injection: L =.3 to 3.3 m Injection nozzle arrangement:

Test case definition 3

Two-fluid model Evaluation.8.6.4 FZR-38 experiment FAD-SST RPI-SST, C TD =.35.5 FZR-39 experiment FAD-SST RPI-SST, C TD =.35 α g..8.6 α g.5.4..5..4.6.8..4.6.8 For details refer to J.-M. Shi, T. Frank, E. Krepper, D. Lucas, U. Rohde, H.-M. Prasser, ICMF4, Paper No.4 Th. Frank, J.-M. Shi, and A. Burns, 3rd International Symposium on Two-Phase Flow Modeling and Experimentation, Pisa, Italy, -4 September, 4 4

Poly-dispersed model Evaluation Stationary, axisym., bubbly flow at the upper test section (L/D = 59. Data from measurements: superficial velocities, mean bubble diameter, local gas volume fraction Index Ul Ug Air Air Air Air 3 [m/s] [m/s] VF[%] dp VF[%] dp VF[%] dp VF[%] 7.6.368.86 4.8. 7..66 7.55.368 4.43 4.8.7 6.6 3.6 7.45.368 9.9 4.6 8.8 6.4.9 7.45.368 9.9 3.8.48 5. 5.7 6.4.9 83.45.574.76 4.8 9.86 6.7.9 83.45.574.76 3.7. 5. 8.86 6.7.9 84.64.574 8.95 4.6 8.4 6.4.7 7.7.4 3.77 5. 9.47 6.8 4.3 8.6.4 8.69 4.7 8. 6.3.59 4.47.4 3.46.7 3.46 4.47.4 3.46.4.7 3.4.75 Ul, Ug superficial velocity, dp diameter [mm], VF gas volume fraction. 5

Results from poly-dispersed model.5 FZR-7 exp. sum d= 4.8mm d= 7.mm.5 FZR-7 exp. sum d= 4.6mm d= 6.4mm α g α g.5.5..4.6.8..4.6.8.5 FZR-83 exp. sum d= 3.7mm d= 5.mm d= 6.7mm.5 FZR-84 exp. sum d= 4.6mm d= 6.4mm α g α g.5.5..4.6.8..4.6.8 6

TD coefficient, FZR7, C TD = 3 4 ρ f C D dp ν f,t σ f U p U f 4 d= 4.8mm, CTD, FZR7, Grace d= 6.6mm, CTD 4 d= 4.8mm, CTD, FZR7Ishii&Zuber d= 6.6mm, CTD Turb. Disp. Coeff 8 6 Turb. Disp. Coeff 8 6 4 4...3.4.5.6.7.8.9...3.4.5.6.7.8.9 CD, Slip Velocity.5.5.5 d= 4.8mm, CD, FZR7Grace d= 7.mm, CD d= 4.8mm, Slip V d= 7.mm, Slip V CD, Slip Velocity.5.5.5 d= 4.8mm, CD, FZR7Ishii&Zuber d= 7.mm, CD d= 4.8mm, Slip V d= 7.mm, Slip V...3.4.5.6.7.8.9...3.4.5.6.7.8.9 7

TD coefficient, FZR, C TD = 3 4 ρ f C D dp ν f,t σ f U p U f 35 3 d=.4mm, CTD, FZR, Grace d= 3.4mm, CTD 35 3 d=.4mm, CTD, FZRIshii&Zuber d= 3.4mm, CTD Turb. Disp. Coeff 5 5 Turb. Disp. Coeff 5 5...3.4.5.6.7.8.9...3.4.5.6.7.8.9 CD, Slip Velocity.8.6.4. d=.4mm, CD, FZR, Grace d= 3.4mm, CD d=.4mm, Slip V d= 3.4mm, Slip V CD, Slip Velocity.8.6.4. d=.4mm, CD, FZRIshii&Zuber d= 3.4mm, CD d=.4mm, Slip V d= 3.4mm, Slip V...3.4.5.6.7.8.9...3.4.5.6.7.8.9 8