PRELIMINARY REPORT. July 21th 2017 Bodrum Offshore Earthquake (Muğla-Turkey) Mw=6.5.

Similar documents
PRELIMINARY REPORT. September, 17, 2013 Muş Earthquake (Eastern Part of Turkey) Ml=

UPDATED PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS FOR TURKEY

Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment of Quetta, Pakistan

Vertical to Horizontal (V/H) Ratios for Large Megathrust Subduction Zone Earthquakes

PRELIMINARY REPORT ON March 8, 2010 ELAZIG EARTHQUAKES (EASTHERN TURKEY) PREPARED BY EARTHQUAKE DEPARTMENT WORKING GROUPS*

THE EFFECT OF THE LATEST SUMATRA EARTHQUAKE TO MALAYSIAN PENINSULAR

EARTHQUAKE CLUSTERS, SMALL EARTHQUAKES

Horizontal Peak Ground Acceleration Attenuation Relationship. Way and Argumentation of its choice.

ACCOUNTING FOR SITE EFFECTS IN PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS: OVERVIEW OF THE SCEC PHASE III REPORT

ATTENUATION FUNCTION RELATIONSHIP OF SUBDUCTION MECHANISM AND FAR FIELD EARTHQUAKE

Comment on Why Do Modern Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses Often Lead to Increased Hazard Estimates? by Julian J. Bommer and Norman A.

CYPRUS STRONG MOTION DATABASE: RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR SHORT RETURN PERIOD EVENTS IN CYPRUS

Preliminary probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the Nuclear Power Plant Bohunice (Slovakia) site

ENGINEERING GROUND MOTION PARAMETERS ATTENUATION RELATIONSHIPS FOR GREECE

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION IN CIVIL ENGINEERING Int. J. Optim. Civil Eng., 2011; 4:

Empirical ground-motion prediction equations for Northwestern. Turkey using the aftershocks of the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake

PRELIMINARY AFTERSHOCK ANALYSIS OF THE BALA - ANKARA EARTHQUAKES (DECEMBER 20, Ml=5.6, DECEMBER 27, 2007-Ml=5.5) IN CENTRAL TURKEY

STRENGTH AND ENERGY DEMANDS FROM THE AUGUST 1999 KOCAELI EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS. A. Sari 1 and L. Manuel 2 ABSTRACT

The 2016, October 26, Central Italy Earthquake Origin Time 17:10:36 UTC, M L(ISNet) =5.3; M W(ISNet) =5.6

Comparisons of Ground Motions from the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake with Empirical Predictions Largely Based on Data from California

Seismic hazard modeling for Bulgaria D. Solakov, S. Simeonova

Comparison of response spectra from Australian earthquakes and North American attenuation models

SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS. Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1

A note on ground motion recorded during Mw 6.1 Mae Lao (Northern Thailand) earthquake on 5 May 2014

The 2003, M W 7.2 Fiordland Earthquake, and its nearsource aftershock strong motion data

Analysis Of Earthquake Records of Istanbul Earthquake Rapid Response System Stations Related to the Determination of Site Fundamental Frequency

RELOCATION OF THE MACHAZE AND LACERDA EARTHQUAKES IN MOZAMBIQUE AND THE RUPTURE PROCESS OF THE 2006 Mw7.0 MACHAZE EARTHQUAKE

Ground-Motion Attenuation Relationships for Subduction- Zone Earthquakes in Northern Taiwan

Updating the Chiou and YoungsNGAModel: Regionalization of Anelastic Attenuation

AN IMPROVED EARTHQUAKE CATALOGUE (M 4.0) FOR TURKEY AND NEAR SURROUNDING ( )

Ground motion attenuation relations of small and moderate earthquakes in Sichuan region

SOURCE PROCESS OF THE 2003 PUERTO PLATA EARTHQUAKE USING TELESEISMIC DATA AND STRONG GROUND MOTION SIMULATION

Estimation of Strong Ground Motion: Aleatory Variability and Epistemic Uncertainty

What Are Recorded In A Strong-Motion Record?

GROUND MOTION. based on National Network station basis.

NGA-Subduction: Development of the Largest Ground Motion Database for Subduction Events

Impacts of 2014 Chiangrai Earthquake from Geotechnical Perspectives

Magnitude 7.1 PERU. There are early reports of homes and roads collapsed leaving one dead and several dozen injured.

Geo-Marine Letters Volume 36, 2016, electronic supplementary material

Figure Locations of the CWB free-field strong motion stations, the epicenter, and the surface fault of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake.

THESSALONIKI SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT: PROBABILISTIC AND DETERMINISTIC APPROACH FOR ROCK SITE CONDITIONS

Magnitude 7.8 SCOTIA SEA

Lesvos June 12, 2017, Mw 6.3 event, a quick study of the source

INVESTIGATION ON ATTENUATION CHARACTERISTICS OF STRONG GROUND MOTIONS IN CHINA AND HONG KONG

Empirical Green s Function Analysis of the Wells, Nevada, Earthquake Source

Estimation of Peak Ground Acceleration for Delhi Region using Finsim, a Finite Fault Simulation Technique

New Prediction Formula of Fourier Spectra Based on Separation Method of Source, Path, and Site Effects Applied to the Observed Data in Japan

Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion

Comparison of earthquake source spectra and attenuation in eastern North America and southeastern Australia

NATIONAL SEISMIC NETWORKS OF TURKEY

SEISMIC HAZARD AND SEISMIC DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ARABIAN PENINSULA REGION

STRONG GROUND MOTION ATTENUATION IN THE SEA OF JAPAN (OKHOTSK-AMUR PLATES BOUNDARY) REGION

ATTENUATION OF PEAK HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ACCELERATION IN THE DINARIDES AREA

A SPECTRAL ATTENUATION MODEL FOR JAPAN USING DIGITAL STRONG MOTION RECORDS OF JMA87 TYPE

GMPEs for Active Crustal Regions: Applicability for Controlling Sources

PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE 2011 JAPAN EARTHQUAKE (M 9.0) GROUND MOTION RECORDS V1.01

STUDYING THE IMPORTANT PARAMETERS IN EARTHQUAKE SIMULATION BASED ON STOCHASTIC FINITE FAULT MODELING

SOURCE MODELING OF RECENT LARGE INLAND CRUSTAL EARTHQUAKES IN JAPAN AND SOURCE CHARACTERIZATION FOR STRONG MOTION PREDICTION

Seismic Source Mechanism

NEXT GENERATION ATTENUATION (NGA) EMPIRICAL GROUND MOTION MODELS: CAN THEY BE USED IN EUROPE?

SPECTRA FOR VERTICAL EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION

A Prototype of Strong Ground Motion Prediction Procedure for Intraslab Earthquake based on the Characterized Source Model

Comparison of Long-Period Ground Motions in the Kanto Basin during the 2004 Niigata Chuetsu and the 2011 Fukushima Hamado ri Earthquakes

Messa in sicurezza di edifici storici

M. (2005) : 3 (1) ISSN

INTRODUCTION AND PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF STRONG MOTION RECORDINGS FROM THE 12 MAY 2005 Ms8.0 WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE OF CHINA

THE ECAT SOFTWARE PACKAGE TO ANALYZE EARTHQUAKE CATALOGUES

Teleseismic waveform modelling of the 2008 Leonidio event

The Slapdown Phase in High Acceleration Records of Large Earthquakes

Fracture induced shear wave splitting in a source area of triggered seismicity by the Tohoku-oki earthquake in northeastern Japan.

What happened before the last five strong earthquakes in Greece: Facts and open questions

NEW ATTENUATION FORMULA OF EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS PASSING THROUGH THE VOLCANIC FRONT

Near-field strong ground motion records from Vrancea earthquakes

Earthquakes and seismic hazard in Sweden

The Mw 6.2 Leonidio, southern Greece earthquake of January 6, 2008: Preliminary identification of the fault plane.

Preliminary report on the Canterbury Earthquake South Island of New Zealand , M 6.3

Three Fs of earthquakes: forces, faults, and friction. Slow accumulation and rapid release of elastic energy.

DIRECT HAZARD ANALYSIS OF INELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA

CONTENTS PREFACE. VII 1. INTRODUCTION VARIOUS TOPICS IN SEISMOLOGY TECTONICS PERTAINING TO EQ PREDICTION 5

ON STRONG GROUND MOTION AND MACRO-SEISMIC INTENSITY OF LUSHAN MS7.0 EARTHQUAKE

Ground Motion Prediction Equation Hazard Sensitivity Results for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Site (PVNGS)

Time-varying and long-term mean aftershock hazard in Wellington

An empirical attenuation relationship for Northwestern Turkey ground motion using a random effects approach

ANALYSIS OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN INSTRUMENTAL INTENSITIES OF STRONG EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION

Updated NGA-West2 Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Active Tectonic Regions Worldwide

Magnitude 7.7 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION

THE RESPONSE SPECTRUM

Magnitude 7.4 SOUTH GEORGIA ISLAND REGION

Structural behavior of a high-rise RC structure under vertical earthquake motion

FEASIBILITY STUDY ON EARTHQUAKE EARLY WARNING SYSTEM FOR THE CITY OF LIMA, PERU, USING A NEWLY DEPLOYED STRONG-MOTION NETWORK

(First Edition: prepared on 29/12/2003)

BROADBAND STRONG MOTION SIMULATION OF THE 2004 NIIGATA- KEN CHUETSU EARTHQUAKE: SOURCE AND SITE EFFECTS

DUBAI SEISMIC NETWORK (DSN)

Source modeling of hypothetical Tokai-Tonankai-Nankai, Japan, earthquake and strong ground motion simulation using the empirical Green s functions

Crustal deformation by the Southeast-off Kii Peninsula Earthquake

SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND SEISMIC SAFTY FOR THE PROPOSED ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATORIES AT ABU TARTUR AND FAYED SITES, EGYPT

VALIDATION AGAINST NGA EMPIRICAL MODEL OF SIMULATED MOTIONS FOR M7.8 RUPTURE OF SAN ANDREAS FAULT

Ground motion directionality in the Canterbury earthquakes

Probabilistic Earthquake Risk Assessment of Newcastle and Lake Macquarie Part 1 Seismic Hazard.

Average response spectra from some Australian earthquakes

Transcription:

PRELIMINARY REPORT July 21th 2017 Bodrum Offshore Earthquake (Muğla-Turkey) Mw=6.5 www.deprem.gov.tr www.afad.gov.tr REPUBLIC OF TUKEY MANAGEMENT PRESIDENCY

An earthquake with magnitude Mw=6.5 occurred at local time 01:31 on July, 21, 2017. Epicenteral coordinates of the earthquake was determined as 36.9198 N - 27.4435 E. and 19.44 km depth. Total 225 weak motion stations record were used for determination of this earthquake parameters. After this earthquake, 1369 aftershocks were recorded with magnitude range 1.0-5.0 in the first five days (21-26 July 2017) (www.deprem.gov.tr) (Fig.1, Graph 1). This earthquake was strongly felt in large area. Muğla City and Districts center, whole Aegean Region and Kos Island in Greece. It caused major damage in some structures in Kos Island and 70 injured in Bodrum, 20 incured in Datça and 2 dead were reported by press in Kos Island. Focal Mechanism Solutions performed by considering first motion direction of P wave and moment tensor method of Mw=6.5 earthquake is emerged from normal faulting (E-W direction) (Fig.2). Improvment of earthquake locations were performed via HypoDD method and It is given in figure 3 and 4 as comparatively. Total 1051 event were used (M>=1.0) as input data. HypoDD results indicate E-W linearity in aftershock activities. According to coulomb stress change that is performed with source fault parameter of Mw=6.5 earthquake, it is observed that west and east part of the fault are loaded with additional stress of aproximately 0.8-1 bar and stress is decreasing in North-South direction. (Fig.5). In the last century, earthquakes that occurred in the region are given as; 1926 Datça offshore Ms=7.7, 1933 Aegean Sea Ms=6.4, 1941 Muğla Ms=6.0, 1941 Muğla offshore Ms=6.0, 1943 Aegean Sea Ms=5.8, 1944 Aegean Sea Ms=5.6, 1989 Gökova Gulf Mw=5.5 (Fig.6). Bodrum offshore earthquake has been recorded by 209 accelerometer stations, which belong to AFAD National Strong Motion Network (TR-NSMN). Epicentral distances (Repi) range from 12 to 628km. PGA values are uncorrected data and given in the table. The largest peak ground acceleration (PGA) has been recorded at Muğla-Bodrum Station called 4809 (158.76gal at NS component). According to 4809 record, SM durations have been calculated as follows; Significant Duration 5.2sec (estimated between 5% and 95% of the IA) as seen in the figure 7, Effective Duration 5.2sec, Bracketed Duration 19.9sec. In addition to this, Acceleration, Velocity Waveforms and Fourier and Response spectrum graphs of 4809 station are given below (Table 1 and Figure 7-10)

Generated by AFAD-RED (Rapid Damage and Loss Estimation System), intensity Map is given in the figure 11. According to AFAD-RED, earthquake intensity has been designated as VII (very strong shaking). Also, acquired from measured accelerations, AFAD-ShakeMap of offshore of Bodrum Earthquake has been created by using AFAD Epicenter parameters as seen in the Figure 12. Earthquake activity of this region (and all of Turkey) has been observed in Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Earthquake Department Data Center Ankara 7 days/24 hours with 255 weak motion and 660 accelerometer total 915 seismic station. Obtained results are shared with public, press and relevant authorized. For your information.

Fig. 1. 21.07.2017 Bodrum Offshore earthquake (Mw=6.5) and aftershock distribution (between 21-26 July 2017)

Number of Earthquake Number of Earthquake 21.07.2017 Bodrum Offshore Earthquake (Mw=6.5) Graph 1. Distribution of aftershocks in the first five days (21-26 July 2017)

Fig. 2. Focal Mechanism Solutions of Bodrum Offshore Eq. Mw=6.5 (red one indicate p wave first motion, black one indicate moment tensor solution)

Depth Depth 21.07.2017 Bodrum Offshore Earthquake (Mw=6.5) Fig. 3. Improvment earthquake locations via HypoDD Method (before HypoDD) (Waldhauser, F. and Ellsworth, W.L. 2000)

Depth Depth 21.07.2017 Bodrum Offshore Earthquake (Mw=6.5) Fig. 4. Improvment earthquake locations via HypoDD Method (after HypoDD)

Fig. 5. Coulomb stress change

Fig.6. Instrumental period earthquake activity in the region

Table 1. Acceleration values of Bodrum Offshore Earthquake (according to epicentral distance, first 10 records) detailed information can be reached from http://kyhdata.deprem.gov.tr

Fig. 7. Distribution of accelerometers recorded during the Bodrum Offshore Eq. (Mw=6.5)

Fig.8. Distribution of accelerometer stations and PGA values measured during the Bodrum Offshore Eq. (Mw= 6.5).

Fig.9. Acc, Velocity, Fourier and Response spectrum graphs of Bodrum Offshore Eq. (Mw=6.5). (Bodrum Station)

Fig.10. Arias Intensity (IA) Graph of Bodrum Eq. (Mw=6.5) calculated from Bodrum station.

Fig.11. AFAD-RED Estimated Intensity Map generated together with measured accelerations coming from TR-NSMN

Bodrum Offshore Earthquake (Mw=6.5) Fig.12. AFAD-ShakeMap generated by using measured accelerations and AFAD Epicenter parameters.

REFERENCES - AFAD Earthquake catalogue (2007 present), Prime Ministry, Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Earthquake Department, On-line Catalogue, http://www.deprem.gov.tr:1217/tr/ddakatalogu - Ambraseys N.N., Simpson K.A. and Bommer J.J., 1996, Prediction of Horizontal Response Spectra in Europe, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 25, 371-400. - Boore, D.M., Joyner, W.B., Fumal, T.E., (1997) Equations for Estimating Horizontal Response Spectra and Peak Acceleration from Western North American Earthquakes: A summary of Recent Work, Seismological Research Letters, Vol.68(1), 128-153 - Emre Ö, Duman TY, Özalp S, Elmacı H, Olgun Ş, Şaroğlu F (2013) Active Fault Map of Turkey Mineral Research and Exploration General Directorate, Special Issue Series-30, Ankara-Turkey - Kadirioğlu, FT., Kartal, RF., Kılıç, T., Kalafat, D., Duman, TY., Eroğlu Azak, T., Özalp, S., Emre, Ö. (2016). An Improved Earthquake Catalogue (M 4.0) for Turkey and Its Near Vicinity (1900-2012). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Published online. DOI 10.1007/s10518-016-0064-8 - Sadigh K., Chang C.-Y., Egan J.A., Makdisi F., and Youngs R.R., 1997, Attenuation Relationships for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Based on California Strong Motion Data, Seismological Research Letters Vol. 68(1), 180-189, January/February - Waldhauser, F., Ellsworth, W.L. (2000) A Double-Difference Earthquake Location Algorithm: Method and Application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90, 6, pp. 1353 1368,