SPECIFIC ANGULAR MOMENTUM DISTRIBUTION FOR SOLAR ANALOGS AND TWINS: WHERE IS THE SUN MISSING HIS ANGULAR MOMENTUM?

Similar documents
ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS. Rotation and lithium in single giant stars,

Classical Methods for Determining Stellar Masses, Temperatures, and Radii

The Hertzprung-Russell Diagram. The Hertzprung-Russell Diagram. Question

AST1100 Lecture Notes

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Department. Problem Set 6

Observed Properties of Stars - 2 ASTR 2110 Sarazin

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Department. Quiz 2

From the first stars to planets

Examination paper for FY2450 Astrophysics

10/16/ Detecting Planets Around Other Stars. Chapter 10: Other Planetary Systems The New Science of Distant Worlds

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 10 Aug 2015

Astronomy 241: Review Questions #2 Distributed: November 7, 2013

The Hertzsprung Russell Diagram. The Main Sequence

A = 6561 times greater. B. 81 times greater. C. equally strong. D. 1/81 as great. E. (1/81) 2 = 1/6561 as great Pearson Education, Inc.

A DESCRIPTION OF EXTRA-SOLAR PLANETARY ORBITS THROUGH A SCHRÖDINGER TYPE DIFFUSION EQUATION

Science Olympiad Astronomy C Division Event National Exam

Dynamical Stability of Terrestrial and Giant Planets in the HD Planetary System

Ay123 Set 1 solutions

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 16 Dec 2004

Characterization of the exoplanet host stars. Exoplanets Properties of the host stars. Characterization of the exoplanet host stars

From measuring and classifying the stars to understanding their physics

ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS. Lithium and rotation on the subgiant branch. II. Theoretical analysis of observations

Charles Keeton. Principles of Astrophysics. Using Gravity and Stellar Physics. to Explore the Cosmos. ^ Springer

A Survey of Stellar Families Multiplicity of Solar-type Stars

Astronomy 111 Exam Review Problems (Real exam will be Tuesday Oct 25, 2016)

B ν (T) = 2hν3 c 3 1. e hν/kt 1. (4) For the solar radiation λ = 20µm photons are in the Rayleigh-Jean region, e hν/kt 1+hν/kT.

Earth-like planets in habitable zones around L (and T) dwarfs

Star-planet connection:

Lecture 20: Planet formation II. Clues from Exoplanets

Exponential Profile Formation in Simple Models of Scattering Processes

Assignment 1. Due Jan. 31, 2017

Extrasolar Planets. Properties Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley

[25] Exoplanet Characterization (11/30/17)

On the relation between stars and their planets

12. Physical Parameters from Stellar Spectra. Fundamental effective temperature calibrations Surface gravity indicators Chemical abundances

Astro Week 1. (a) Show that the transit duration for a non-central transit (see Figures) is: R R. b = a cos i

Chapter 13 Other Planetary Systems. Why is it so difficult to detect planets around other stars? Brightness Difference

Astronomy 102: Stars and Galaxies Examination 3 April 11, 2003

1 The displacement, s in metres, of an object after a time, t in seconds, is given by s = 90t 4 t 2

Gravitation. Luis Anchordoqui

Importance of the study of extrasolar planets. Exoplanets Introduction. Importance of the study of extrasolar planets

Astronomy 111 Review Problems Solutions

Gravitation. Kepler s Law. BSc I SEM II (UNIT I)

Data from: The Extrasolar Planet Encyclopaedia.

r p L = = So Jupiter has the greater angular momentum.

Chapter 4 Making Sense of the Universe: Understanding Motion, Energy, and Gravity. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Astronomy 113. Dr. Joseph E. Pesce, Ph.D. Dr. Joseph E. Pesce, Ph.D.

Dynamical properties of the Solar System. Second Kepler s Law. Dynamics of planetary orbits. ν: true anomaly

Delicious Diameters of Dwarfs (in particular, the juicy red ones)

Name. Satellite Motion Lab

Architecture and demographics of planetary systems

Chapter 13. Universal Gravitation

The Restricted 3-Body Problem

II Planet Finding.

Binary star formation

Ay 1 Lecture 2. Starting the Exploration

Mass-Radius Relation: Hydrogen Burning Stars

7 - GRAVITATION Page 1 ( Answers at the end of all questions )

MSci Astrophysics 210PHY412

Chapter 13 Lecture. The Cosmic Perspective. Seventh Edition. Other Planetary Systems: The New Science of Distant Worlds Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 13 Lecture. The Cosmic Perspective Seventh Edition. Other Planetary Systems: The New Science of Distant Worlds Pearson Education, Inc.

Extrasolar Planets. Methods of detection Characterization Theoretical ideas Future prospects

Dr G. I. Ogilvie Lent Term 2005 INTRODUCTION

ASTR2050: Introductory Astronomy and Astrophysics Syllabus for Spring 1999 January 4, 1999

Revision: Sun, Stars (and Planets) See web slides of Dr Clements for Planets revision. Juliet Pickering Office: Huxley 706

Young Solar-like Systems

while the Planck mean opacity is defined by

Student Workbook for Physics for Scientists and Engineers: A Strategic Approach with Modern Physics Randall D. Knight Third Edition

ASTR 2030 Black Holes Fall Homework 2. Due in class Wed Mar 6

2. Equations of Stellar Structure

Lecture #5: Plan. The Beginnings of Modern Astronomy Kepler s Laws Galileo

A Continuous Counterpart to Schwarzschild s Liquid Sphere Model

Today. Homework Due. Stars. Properties (Recap) Nuclear Reactions. proton-proton chain. CNO cycle. Stellar Lifetimes

Observed Properties of Stars - 2 ASTR 2120 Sarazin

» How vast those Orbs must be, and how inconsiderable this Earth, the Theatre upon which all our mighty Designs, all our Navigations, and all our

What is it like? When did it form? How did it form. The Solar System. Fall, 2005 Astronomy 110 1

Pulsars ASTR2110 Sarazin. Crab Pulsar in X-rays

Ten CORAVEL spectroscopic binary orbits of evolved stars

Name: unid: Foundations of Astronomy ASTR/PHYS Final Exam

Tidal effects and periastron events in binary stars

Astronomy 421. Lecture 8: Binary stars

Black Holes. Observed properties of black holes Accretion disks Gravitational energy Rotating black holes Eddington luminosity

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANET-HOSTING STARS AND OPTIMIZATION OF THE EXTRASOLAR PLANET SEARCHES

Eclipsing Binaries in Open Clusters

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 1 Mar 2000

Chapter 13 Lecture. The Cosmic Perspective Seventh Edition. Other Planetary Systems: The New Science of Distant Worlds Pearson Education, Inc.

Ay101 Set 1 solutions

Lecture 12: Extrasolar planets. Astronomy 111 Monday October 9, 2017

AS1001:Extra-Galactic Astronomy

The Sun - Size and Mass. Masses. Note: Most of solar system mass is in. Radii } } Densities

Examination paper for FY2450 Astrophysics

Planet Detection. AST 105 Intro Astronomy The Solar System

Chapter 13 Other Planetary Systems. The New Science of Distant Worlds

2. Correlations between Stellar Properties

The peculiar transit signature of CoRoT-29b

The Connection between Planets and the Stellar Chemical Composition

New Dimensions of Stellar Atmosphere Modelling

AP Physics QUIZ Gravitation

A STUDY OF CLOSE ENCOUNTERS BETWEEN MARS AND ASTEROIDS FROM THE 3:1 RESONANCE. Érica C. Nogueira, Othon C. Winter

Components of Galaxies: Dark Matter

Transcription:

5th International Workshop on Astronomy and Relativistic Astrophysics (IWARA2011) International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series Vol. 18 (2012) 58 62 c World Scientific Publishing Company DOI: 10.1142/S2010194512008203 SPECIFIC ANGULAR MOMENTUM DISTRIBUTION FOR SOLAR ANALOGS AND TWINS: WHERE IS THE SUN MISSING HIS ANGULAR MOMENTUM? J. S. DA COSTA, J. D. DO NASCIMENTO JR. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Departamento de Física Teórica Experimental CEP: 59072-970 Natal, RN, Brazil jefferson@dfte.ufrn.br dias@dfte.ufrn.br It is well established that there is a breakdown in the curve of specific angular momentum as a function of mass for stars on the main sequence Ref. 5. Stars earlier than F5 and more massive than the sun, rotate rapidly over a large mass range. For spectral type F5 and later, including the Sun, much smaller rotational velocities are found. We revisit this question from a new sample to shed a light on the basis of a sample solar twins and analogs recently observed by interferometric measurements of stellar radius. Our results clearly show that, as the Sun, the solar twins present similar global behavior from their specific angular momentum. 18 Sco and HIP 100963 have a specific angular momentum one order higher than the solar value, and HIP 55459 and HIP 56948 have a specific angular momentum one order lower than the solar value. Keywords: stellar rotation; stellar angular momentum. 1. Introduction It is notorious that conservation laws are founded in many branches of physics. In stellar astrophysics is not different. The conservation law associated with the stellar rotation is the angular momentum conservation. In the 1960 s several work were developed to understand the stellar rotation, stellar angular momentum, and their consequences Ref. 1. In 1970 Kraft obtained a relationship between rotational angular momentum and stellar mass for MS stars assuming stars like a solid body and assuming a simple mass-luminosity relation. The Kraft s results showed that angular momentum is proportional to stellar mass for stars early than F0. However, for stars later than F0 this relation is not completely true. The stellar angular momentum for these stars present a sudden drop off called. In our study we are interested in the analysis of the angular momentum behavior for solar analogs and twins angular momentum. We show that breaking down provided by Ref. 5 is observed in solar analogs and twins. Consequently, we are interested in explain what 58

Specific Angular Momentum Distribution for Solar Analogs and Twins 59 kind of mechanism could leads this peculiar behavior in the sun, and solar analogs and twins angular momentum. 2. Observational Datas For this study we composed a bona fide sample of 118 solar analogs and twins from Refs. 6,and 2, this sample were selected through of V magnitude, and B-V color index from Hipparcos satelite. For this sample the atmospherical parameters: effective temperature (T eff ), microturbulence velocity (v mic ), surface gravity (log g), the metallicity [Fe/H], and chemical abundances were computed through of spectral synthesis from Ref. 6.Projected rotational velocity (vsini), and the stellar mass were collected respectively from Refs. 3,and 2. 3. Methods For estimate the specific angular momentum was acquired from a procedure composed by several steps. First, we should to compute the rotational angular momentum. From this we have to consider the stars like a solid body with this, the rotational angular momentum can be computed by the equation (1). <J(M) >= I(M) <V(M) > <R(M) > Where <V(M) > is the rotational velocity and can be defined as a function of projected rotational velocity v sini. The momentum of inertia for a massive sphere is defined by I = (2/5)MR 2. The stellar radii were computed through the Stefan - Boltzmann law equation (2). (1) L =4πR 2 T 2 eff (2) We can use this procedure because the effective temperature and stellar luminosity are parameters well determined. Consequently, to obtain the specific angular momentum per mass unit we just need to over the specific angular momentum by stellar mass. However in, our study we also analyzed the angular momentum of planet host stars. We try to simulate what is the effect on the angular momentum if each stars of our sample has a Jupiter with the same orbital velocity, mass, and position of Jupiter in the solar system. For the computation of Jupiter in the some solar system orbital angular momentum for this planet we consider the consider a elliptic orbit with a orbital semi-major axis (a), and the orbital eccentricity (e). The orbital angular momentum can be calculated by the equation (3). <J> orb = µ Ga(M + M pla )(1 e 2 ) (3)

60 J. S. da Costa and J. D. do Nascimento Jr. Where the M,M pla, G, a, ande are respectively the stellar mass, planetary mass, universal gravitational constant, semi-major axis, and orbital eccentricity. µ is the reduced mass, and is defined by equation (4) µ = M M pla (4) M + M pla The specific total angular momentum per mass unit will be the total sum between orbital angular momentum, and rotational angular momentum over the stellar mass. 4. Results From the Figure 1 we can see that solar analogs and twins present the same breaking down as predicted by Ref. 5. To explain this breaking we can propose two different hypothesis. First, we can assume that all G stars could be planets host stars, however Fig. 1. Distribution of specific angular momentum as a function of mass. The dashed lines represents the Kraft s curve Ref. 5, and Kawaler s curve Ref. 4. The open circles represents the solar analogs from our sample. The solid circles represents the solar twins (HIP 55459, HIP 56948, HIP 79672, and HIP 100963).

Specific Angular Momentum Distribution for Solar Analogs and Twins 61 Fig. 2. The open circles and the solid circles represents respectivelly solar analogs and twins when a Jupiter like planets is included in their specific angular momentum. when we consider the total solar angular momentum (rotational angular momentum and a Jupiter like planet angular momentum) showed in Figure 2, we recognize that total angular momentum is higher than angular momentum predicted by Kraft s theoretical low. The second hypothesis is that the radial differential rotation consume part of the angular momentum. Based on result from Figure 2, we concluded that our first hypothesis alone is not sufficient for to explain this behavior, however based on our results is not possible to explain what type of mechanism explain this angular momentum super estimation. Our future perspectives are to obtain a explanation for this phenomenon taking into account the differential rotation effects. Acknowledgments Research activities of the Stellar Board at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte are supported by continuous grants from CNPq and FAPERN Brazilian Agencies.

62 J. S. da Costa and J. D. do Nascimento Jr. References 1. Abt, H. A., Hunter, ApJ, 136, 381 (1962). 2. do Nascimento, J. D., da Costa, J. S., De Medeiros, J. R, A&A, 519, 101 (2010). 3. Holmberg, J., Nordström, B., Andersen, J, A&A, 501, 941 (2009). 4. Kawaler S. D., PASP, 99, 1322 (1987). 5. Kraft R. P., ApJ, 150, 551 (1967). 6. Takeda, Y, Kawanomoto, S., Honda, S., Ando, H., Sakurai, A&A, 468, 663 (2007).