Lorentz Group. Ling Fong Li. 1 Lorentz group Generators Simple representations... 3

Similar documents
Note 2. Ling fong Li. 1 Klein Gordon Equation Probablity interpretation Solutions to Klein-Gordon Equation... 2

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 3 Solutions Out: Oct 1, 2008., where ( 00. ), so the overall state of the system is ) ( ( ( ( 00 ± 11 ), Φ ± = 1

Lecture 6/7 (February 10/12, 2014) DIRAC EQUATION. The non-relativistic Schrödinger equation was obtained by noting that the Hamiltonian 2

7. Products and matrix elements

Group Theory in Physics

From Biot-Savart Law to Divergence of B (1)

Homework & Solution. Contributors. Prof. Lee, Hyun Min. Particle Physics Winter School. Park, Ye

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Inner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal

Quantum Mechanics I - Session 4

Poisson brackets and canonical transformations

APPENDIX A Some Linear Algebra

Lagrangian Field Theory

9 Characteristic classes

Quantum Mechanics for Scientists and Engineers. David Miller

1 Matrix representations of canonical matrices

Canonical transformations

Solutions to Exercises in Astrophysical Gas Dynamics

5 The Rational Canonical Form

2.3 Nilpotent endomorphisms

This model contains two bonds per unit cell (one along the x-direction and the other along y). So we can rewrite the Hamiltonian as:

COMPLEX NUMBERS AND QUADRATIC EQUATIONS

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

PHZ 6607 Lecture Notes

Lecture 12: Discrete Laplacian

n α j x j = 0 j=1 has a nontrivial solution. Here A is the n k matrix whose jth column is the vector for all t j=0

Section 8.3 Polar Form of Complex Numbers

Snce h( q^; q) = hq ~ and h( p^ ; p) = hp, one can wrte ~ h hq hp = hq ~hp ~ (7) the uncertanty relaton for an arbtrary state. The states that mnmze t

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformation II

8.4 COMPLEX VECTOR SPACES AND INNER PRODUCTS

Problem Do any of the following determine homomorphisms from GL n (C) to GL n (C)?

The Jacobsthal and Jacobsthal-Lucas Numbers via Square Roots of Matrices

Notes on Analytical Dynamics

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Calculus of Variations II

Tensor Analysis. For orthogonal curvilinear coordinates, ˆ ˆ (98) Expanding the derivative, we have, ˆ. h q. . h q h q

763622S ADVANCED QUANTUM MECHANICS Solution Set 1 Spring c n a n. c n 2 = 1.

2 More examples with details

Spin-rotation coupling of the angularly accelerated rigid body

Salmon: Lectures on partial differential equations. Consider the general linear, second-order PDE in the form. ,x 2

12. The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation Michael Fowler

Formulas for the Determinant

CHAPTER 5: Lie Differentiation and Angular Momentum

PHYS 215C: Quantum Mechanics (Spring 2017) Problem Set 3 Solutions

10. Canonical Transformations Michael Fowler

Physics 443, Solutions to PS 7

ON MECHANICS WITH VARIABLE NONCOMMUTATIVITY

Perfect Fluid Cosmological Model in the Frame Work Lyra s Manifold

ALGEBRA MID-TERM. 1 Suppose I is a principal ideal of the integral domain R. Prove that the R-module I R I has no non-zero torsion elements.

Mechanics Physics 151

Quantum Mechanics I Problem set No.1

Solution 1 for USTC class Physics of Quantum Information

The Lorentz group. Generate the group SO(3,1) To construct representa;ons a more convenient (non- Hermi;an) basis is. i j ijk k. j ijk k.

A particle in a state of uniform motion remain in that state of motion unless acted upon by external force.

SL n (F ) Equals its Own Derived Group

Solutions to exam in SF1811 Optimization, Jan 14, 2015

Supplemental document

THE VIBRATIONS OF MOLECULES II THE CARBON DIOXIDE MOLECULE Student Instructions

Appendix for Causal Interaction in Factorial Experiments: Application to Conjoint Analysis

Bezier curves. Michael S. Floater. August 25, These notes provide an introduction to Bezier curves. i=0

The Feynman path integral

Rigid body simulation

Notes on Frequency Estimation in Data Streams

1 Vectors over the complex numbers

A how to guide to second quantization method.

ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION IN A CONTINUOUS MEDIUM

Transfer Functions. Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: ( ) system

Bernoulli Numbers and Polynomials

Affine transformations and convexity

POINCARE ALGEBRA AND SPACE-TIME CRITICAL DIMENSIONS FOR PARASPINNING STRINGS

Srednicki Chapter 34

More metrics on cartesian products

CONDITIONS FOR INVARIANT SUBMANIFOLD OF A MANIFOLD WITH THE (ϕ, ξ, η, G)-STRUCTURE. Jovanka Nikić

Solution 1 for USTC class Physics of Quantum Information

Foundations of Arithmetic

Now that we have laws or better postulates we should explore what they imply

Integrals and Invariants of Euler-Lagrange Equations

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 29 Jun 2018

Fixed points of IA-endomorphisms of a free metabelian Lie algebra

SUPER PRINCIPAL FIBER BUNDLE WITH SUPER ACTION

Determinants Containing Powers of Generalized Fibonacci Numbers

Module 3: Element Properties Lecture 1: Natural Coordinates

Density matrix. c α (t)φ α (q)

Singular Value Decomposition: Theory and Applications

Linear Approximation with Regularization and Moving Least Squares

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Hamilton-Jacobi Equation

LECTURE 9 CANONICAL CORRELATION ANALYSIS

Special Relativity and Riemannian Geometry. Department of Mathematical Sciences

MEM 255 Introduction to Control Systems Review: Basics of Linear Algebra

Mathematical Preparations

THEOREMS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

Bézier curves. Michael S. Floater. September 10, These notes provide an introduction to Bézier curves. i=0

1 Convex Optimization

Phys304 Quantum Physics II (2005) Quantum Mechanics Summary. 2. This kind of behaviour can be described in the mathematical language of vectors:

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Representation theory and quantum conservation laws

1. Estimation, Approximation and Errors Percentages Polynomials and Formulas Identities and Factorization 52

Structure and Drive Paul A. Jensen Copyright July 20, 2003

Fall 2012 Analysis of Experimental Measurements B. Eisenstein/rev. S. Errede

Modelli Clamfim Equazione del Calore Lezione ottobre 2014

Lecture 3. Ax x i a i. i i

Difference Equations

Transcription:

Lorentz Group Lng Fong L ontents Lorentz group. Generators............................................. Smple representatons..................................... 3 Lorentz group In the dervaton of Drac equaton t s not clear what s the meanng of the Drac matrces. It turns out that they are related to representatons of Lorentz group. The Lorentz group s a collecton of lnear transformatons of space-tme coordnates whch leaves the proper tme x x x (x o ) ( x) x x g x nvarant. Ths requres the transformaton matrx to satsfy the pseudo-orthogonalty relaton,. Generators g g It s useful to nvestgate the group structure by studyng ther n ntesmal elements near the dentty, the generators. For n ntesmal transformaton, we wrte As before, the pseudo-orthogonalty relaton mples g + wth j" j (g + ) (g + )g g " + " We see that " " : So there are 6 ndependent group parameters. Example: oost along x axs cosh snh snh cosh A Ths mples that " ; " () " ; " Smlarly, " ; and " 3 correspond to boosts n y and z drectons respectvely. A

Example: rotaton about z axs Then cos sn sn cos A " ; " " ; " Smlarly, " 3 ;and " 3 correspond to rotatons about x and y axs respectvely. onsder f(x ), an arbtrary functon of x. Under the n ntesmal Lorentz transformaton, the change n f s A f(x ) f(x ) f(x + " x ) f(x ) + " x f + f(x ) + " [x x ]f(x) + Introduce operators M to represent ths change, then f(x ) f(x) " M f(x) + M (x x ) () generators M are called the generators of Lorentz group operatng on functons of space-tme coordnates. Note that for ; ; ; 3 these are just the angular momentum operator L j (x j x j ). Usng the generators gven n Eq() t s straghtforward to work out commutators of these generators, [M ; M ] (g M g M g M + g M ) De ne M j jk J k ; M o K where J k s correspond to the usual rotatons and K the Lorentz boost operators. We can solve for J to get The commutator of J s are, [J ; J j ] J jkm jk " kl" jmn[m kl; M mn] ( ) ( ) " kl " jmn (g lm M kn g km M ln g ln M km + g kn M lm ) ( ) ( ) [ kl " jln M kn + kl " jkn M ln + kl " jml M km kl " jmk M lm ] Usng dentty we get abc " alm ( bl cm bm cl ) [J ; J j ] jk J k (3)

Thus we can dentfy J as the angular momentum operator. Smlarly, we can derve [K ; K j ] jk J k [J ; K j ] jk K k (4) Eqs(3,4) are called the Lorentz algebra. To smplfy the Lorentz algebra, we de ne the combnatons A (J + K ) ; (J K ) Then t s straghtforward to derve the followng commutaton relatons, [A ; A j ] jk A k ; [ ; j ] jk k ; [A ; j ] Ths means that the algebra of Lorentz generators factorzes nto ndependent SU() algebra. The representatons are just the tensor products of the representaton of SU() algebra. We label the rreducble representaton by (j ; j ) whch transforms as (j + )-dm representaton under A algebra and (j + )- dm representaton under algebra.. Smple representatons (a) ( ; ) representaton a Ths -component object has the followng propertes, A a ( ) ab b ) a ) ombnng these realtons we get (J + K ) a ( ) ab b (J K ) a J ( ); K ( ) (b) (; ) representaton a Smlarly, we can get A a ) (J + K ) a a ( ) ab ) (J K ) a ( ) ab b J ( ); K ( ) If we de ne a 4-component by puttng togather these representatons,

Then the acton of the Lorentz generators are J ; K are related to the 4-component Drac eld we studed before, but wth d erent representaton for the matrces. Ths can be seen as follows. onsder Drac matrces n the followng form _ where (; ) ; _ (; ) More explctly, o It s straghtforward to check that n ths case. 5 3 Ths means that n 4-component eld ; s rght-handed and s left-handed. In ths representaton, usually called the Weyl representaton, t s easy to check that (5) j j j j jk k k In the Lorentz transformaton of Drac eld, (x ) S expf 4 " g expf 4 ( " + j " j )g Wrte " ; " j " jk k j j " jk k jl l l " ) 4 ( " + j " j ) + More precsely, (x ) S expf 4 " g exp " + # (6)

If we wrte the Lorentz transformatons n terms of generators, then n terms of the generators J ; K L exp L exp( M " ) J ( ) + K We then see from Eq(6) that for ths ; J ; K are of the form, J ; K These are the same as those n Eq(5). Thsdemonstrate that the wavefuncton whch sats es Drac equaton s just the representaton ; ; under the Lorentz group. Futhermore, the rghthanded components transform as ; represenaton whle left-handed components transform as ; representaton. - Alternatve choce s to use R and the complex conjugate R ( sometme dotted ndce are used for ths bass) nstead of R and L : Snce we get for the complex conjuate J R ( ) R; K R ( ) R J R ( ) R; K R ( ) R It s probably more clearer to use some other notaton for R ; Then J ( ); K ( ) A ( J + K) ; ( J K) ( ) and ndeed belongs to the rrep (; ):