Exam 1. Econ520. Fall 2013

Similar documents
The Solow Model. Prof. Lutz Hendricks. January 26, Econ520

The Romer Model. Prof. Lutz Hendricks. February 7, Econ520

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Fall 2015 P. Gourinchas/D. Romer MIDTERM EXAM

Solow Growth Model. Michael Bar. February 28, Introduction Some facts about modern growth Questions... 4

Intermediate Macroeconomics, EC2201. L2: Economic growth II

New Notes on the Solow Growth Model

The Solow Growth Model

The Solow Growth Model

Economics 2: Growth (Growth in the Solow Model)

Assumption 5. The technology is represented by a production function, F : R 3 + R +, F (K t, N t, A t )

Dynamic Macroeconomics: Problem Set 4

14.05: Section Handout #1 Solow Model

Equilibrium in a Production Economy

Toulouse School of Economics, M2 Macroeconomics 1 Professor Franck Portier. Exam Solution

Econ 204A: Section 3

From Difference to Differential Equations I

Macroeconomics Qualifying Examination

Macroeconomics Field Exam. August 2007

Neoclassical Business Cycle Model

Department of Economics Queen s University. ECON435/835: Development Economics Professor: Huw Lloyd-Ellis

Endogenous Growth: AK Model

Chapter 9 Solow. O. Afonso, P. B. Vasconcelos. Computational Economics: a concise introduction

ECON 402: Advanced Macroeconomics 1. Advanced Macroeconomics, ECON 402. New Growth Theories

A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth

Business Cycles: The Classical Approach

Problem Set #2: Overlapping Generations Models Suggested Solutions - Q2 revised

1 Bewley Economies with Aggregate Uncertainty

Practice Questions for Mid-Term I. Question 1: Consider the Cobb-Douglas production function in intensive form:

Endogenous Growth Theory

RBC Model with Indivisible Labor. Advanced Macroeconomic Theory

Economic Growth: Lecture 9, Neoclassical Endogenous Growth

Equating output per worker to GDP per capita, the growth rate of GDP per capita

PhD Qualifier Examination

Chapter 9. Natural Resources and Economic Growth. Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko

Lecture 2 The Centralized Economy

Economic Growth of Insiders and Outsiders of a Climate Agreement: A Theoretical Model

Cointegration and the Ramsey Model

Econ 58 Gary Smith Spring Final Exam Answers

Economic Growth

Lecture 3 - Solow Model

Econ 5110 Solutions to the Practice Questions for the Midterm Exam

Mortenson Pissarides Model

TAKEHOME FINAL EXAM e iω e 2iω e iω e 2iω

Problem Set 2. E. Charlie Nusbaum Econ 204A October 12, 2015

Macroeconomics II. Dynamic AD-AS model

Dynamic AD-AS model vs. AD-AS model Notes. Dynamic AD-AS model in a few words Notes. Notation to incorporate time-dimension Notes

3 GROWTH AND CAPITAL ACCUMULATION: THE SOLOW MODEL

1. Using the model and notations covered in class, the expected returns are:

Generic Analysis of Endogenous Growth Models

Lecture 5 Dynamics of the Growth Model. Noah Williams

Lecture 15 Real Business Cycle Model. Noah Williams

THE SOLOW-SWAN MODEL WITH A NEGATIVE LABOR GROWTH RATE

General motivation behind the augmented Solow model

u(c t, x t+1 ) = c α t + x α t+1

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS MACROECONOMICS THEORY Preliminary Exam August 1, :00 am - 2:00 pm

Endogenous Growth. Lecture 17 & 18. Topics in Macroeconomics. December 8 & 9, 2008

Club Convergence: Some Empirical Issues

General Examination in Macroeconomic Theory SPRING 2013

Experimental Design and Graphical Analysis of Data

Section 3: Simple Linear Regression

ADVANCED MACROECONOMICS I

Introduction to Real Business Cycles: The Solow Model and Dynamic Optimization

MFin Econometrics I Session 5: F-tests for goodness of fit, Non-linearity and Model Transformations, Dummy variables

Theoretical premises of the Keynesian approach

A Summary of Economic Methodology

Quantitative Bivariate Data

Rockefeller College University at Albany

EconS Oligopoly - Part 2

General Equilibrium and Welfare

Public Economics The Macroeconomic Perspective Chapter 2: The Ramsey Model. Burkhard Heer University of Augsburg, Germany

1. Basic Neoclassical Model (Solow Model) (April 14, 2014)

Chapter 5. The Engine of Growth. Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko

Economics 202A Lecture Outline #3 (version 1.0)

Analysis of the speed of convergence


EconS Vertical Integration

Lecture notes on modern growth theory

EEE-05, Series 05. Time. 3 hours Maximum marks General Instructions: Please read the following instructions carefully

Growth Theory: Review

Chapter 4 Population and Economic Growth

The Augmented Solow Model Revisited

Growth: Facts and Theories

One-Sector Models of Endogenous Growth. Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko

Part A: Answer question A1 (required), plus either question A2 or A3.

The Simple Linear Regression Model

Growing competition in electricity industry and the power source structure

Competitive Equilibrium and the Welfare Theorems

Conceptual Explanations: Simultaneous Equations Distance, rate, and time

Solow Growth Model. Sang Yoon (Tim) Lee. Jan 9-16, last updated: January 20, Toulouse School of Economics

EC9A2 Advanced Macro Analysis - Class #1

Macroeconomics I, UPF Professor Antonio Ciccone SOLUTIONS PS 5, preliminary version

WISE International Masters

Algebra Year 10. Language

Advanced Macroeconomics

Macroeconomics Qualifying Examination

Macroeconomics II Dynamic macroeconomics Class 1: Introduction and rst models

Economics 202A Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 5

Modeling Economic Growth Using Differential Equations

Session 4: Money. Jean Imbs. November 2010

General Examination in Macroeconomic Theory

Transcription:

Exam 1. Econ520. Fall 2013 Professor Lutz Hendricks UNC Instructions: Answer all questions. Clearly number your answers. Write legibly. Do not write your answers on the question sheets. Explain your answers do not just state them. Show your derivations do not just state the final result. Do not refer to any notes or books. You may use a calculator. The total time is 75 minutes. The total number of points is 100. 1

1 Methods in Macroeconomics [25 points] Briefly describe how one can answer cause-effect questions in macroeconomics, such as: How important is schooling for cross-country income differences? (just to give an example) Consider: 1. controlled experiments, 2. natural experiments, 3. regressions, 4. macroeconomic models. For each method, briefly summarize benefits and drawbacks. Be clear about the limitations of regressions. 2 Solow Model Recall the key equation of the Solow model: kt = sk α t (n + δ) k t. This sets A t = 1 for simplicity. Questions: 1. [9 points] Plot g (k) against k. Explain the key features of your graph (intercept, slope). 2. [9 points] What does this graph imply for convergence of country income levels? 3. [10 points] What happens to the slope of your graph as α increases? What does this mean in words for how the growth rate varies with k? What does it imply for how quickly countries converge to the steady state? 4. [7 points] What is the intuition for the result in #3? 2

3 Solow / Romer Model Consider a version of the Romer model where A t is a rival input in the production of goods. Specifically, assume that the production function is given by Y t = K α t ([A t /L t ] L t ) 1 α What matters for productivity is the amount of knowledge per worker, A t /L t, rather than just A t. Output per worker is then given by y t = (A t /L t ) 1 α k α t. Otherwise the model equations are unchanged: Questions: k t = sy t (n + δ)k t (1) Ȧ t = δ(s A L t ) λ A φ t (2) n = L t /L t (3) [ λ 1. [20 points] Show that the balanced growth rates are given by g (y) = g (k) = n ]. 1 1 φ 2. [8 points] In this model, ( the ) balanced growth rate of y can be negative, even though there is always innovation A t > 0. Explain in words how this is possible. 3. [12 points] Explain how stronger patent protection affects economic efficiency. What is the main trade-off? Give examples of innovations that occur without patent protection. End of exam. 3

4 Answers 4.1 Answer: Methods 1. Controlled experiments: Randomly pick two sets of countries. Change schooling in one set (the treatment group), but nothing else. Do nothing to the other set of countries (the control group). Compare outcomes several years later. The good: clearly produces the right answer, if the experiment is correctly carried out. The bad: impossible to implement. 2. Natural experiments: Nature hits some countries with a shock, such as a natural disaster that destroys capital or a country division. The good: similar to controlled experiments. The bad: hard to find examples. One has to be sure that the disaster did not change anything else. For example, WW2 in Germany destroyed capital, but also changed institutions. 3. Regressions: Regress output on schooling and controls. The good: easy. The bad: wrong answer. Regressions do not answer cause-effect questions. There are omitted variable issues. Reverse causality. 4. Models: Build a model, such as the production model we studied. Pick parameters. Vary schooling in the model and see what it predicts for output. The good: can answer just about any question in principle. The bad: need assumptions. Model could be wrong. 4.2 Answer: Solow Model 1. g (k) = sk α 1 n δ. The intercept is the steady state capital stock given by k 1 α = s/ (n + δ). The slope is negative. This is the principle of transition dynamics. Or one can draw sk α 1 and n + δ against k. Then the curves cross each other at the steady state capital stock. 2. The graph implies that countries grow faster when they are far below the steady state. It does not imply convergence in levels, unless countries share similar parameters s, n, δ, α, and productivity. 3. The graph gets flatter. A good answer needs to show this, not just state it. When you do this, you realize that my language was not very precise. It is not exactly the slope (in the sense of derivative) of the curve that depends on α. The best way of showing the result is to write g (k) as a function of k/k ss and then to take the derivative w.r.to k/k ss. One of the practice problems did that. We have g (k) = s (k/k ss ) α 1 kss α 1 n δ with kss α 1 = (n + δ) /s. Therefore g (k) = (n + δ) ( [k/k ss ] α 1 1 ). Now it is obvious that dg/d (k/k ss ) = (n + δ) (α 1) (k/k ss ) α 2 is increasing in α (for given k/k ss ). So higher α gets the slope closer to 0. A much easier way is to argue that the elasticity of the investment term k α 1 with respect to k is α 1. Or one could say: doubling k increases this term by 2 α 1 or (1/2) 1 α. Higher 4

α brings this factor closer to 1. Either way, deviations from the steady state lead to less rapid growth. Convergence takes longer. 4. Intuition: With low α, the marginal product of k rises very fast as k falls. Given savings imply lots of growth. 4.3 Answer: Solow / Romer Model 1. Balanced growth rates: The exactly follows the standard Solow and Romer models. (a) g(k) = sy/k n δ. Constant g(k) requires constant y/k or g (y) = g (k). (b) From the production function: g (y) = (1 α) g (A/L) + αg (k). Impose g (y) = g (k) and rearrange to get g (y) = g (A/L). (c) The derivation of g (A) is exactly as in the Romer model. g (A/L) = g (A) n. Then g (A) = n λ 1 φ 2. Innovation ensures that g (A) > 0 but not that g (A) > n. It is therefore possible that A/L falls on the BGP. Now that A is rival, productivity in making y is determined by A/L, which falls over time. 3. Patents: Stronger patents offer innovators longer lasting monopolies and therefore profits. The rate of innovation increases. The drawback: monopoly prices are above marginal costs. That is not efficient. Patents also create compliance costs (patent searches, lawsuits). Examples of innovation without patents: Coca-cola (effectively a monopoly due to secrecy). Google (give away a product to sell a complementary one advertising). Ebay (network externality gives ebay a near monopoly). and End of answers. 5