arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 2 Feb 2017

Similar documents
How well do the Ca II K index time series correlate with the ISN?

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.sr] 20 Dec 2016

A New Record of Total Solar Irradiance from 1610 to Present

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 25 Jan 2013

A Century of Solar Ca II Measurements and Their Implication for Solar UV Driving of Climate

SCIENCE USING KODAIKANAL DIGITIZED DATA. V. MuthuPriyal IIA Kodaikanal

Creation of a composite solar ultraviolet irradiance data set

Flare Irradiance Spectral Model (FISM) use for space weather applications

University of Colorado Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics Tom Woods Sun-Climate 2018 Meeting 1

Radius variations over a solar cycle

SpectroWeb: An Interactive Graphical Database of Digital Stellar Spectral Atlases

Dimming of the Mid- 20 th Century Sun

First Results of the TIGRE Chromospheric Activity Survey

A Time Series of Photo-synthetically Available Radiation at the Ocean Surface from SeaWiFS and MODIS Data

Solar variability measured by GOME and SCIAMACHY in the uv/visible/nir spectral range

What We've Learned from SORCE: Solar Cycle Maximum to Minimum

Phillip Chamberlin NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Solar Physics Laboratory Greenbelt, MD USA

Overview of Measured SSI and Its Variability

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 25 May 2015

SOLSTICE I and II: Ultraviolet Variability. Marty Snow, Bill McClintock, Tom Woods, and Gary Rottman Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics

STCE Newsletter. 29 Jan Feb 2018

OUTLINE: P. Kotrč (1), P. Heinzel (1) and O. Procházka (2)

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 9 May 2013

Reconstruction of the past total solar irradiance on short timescales

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 14 Apr 2016

Supporting Calculations for NASA s IRIS Mission. I. Overview

COST-STSM-ES1005-TOSCA

Guidepost. Chapter 08 The Sun 10/12/2015. General Properties. The Photosphere. Granulation. Energy Transport in the Photosphere.

MODELING SOLAR UV/EUV IRRADIANCE AND IONOSPHERE VARIATIONS WITH MT. WILSON MAGNETIC INDICIES

5. Quality Control and Calibration Standards

SBUV(/2) and SSBUV Solar Irradiance Measurements Matthew DeLand, Richard Cebula, Liang-Kang Huang Science Systems and Applications, Inc.

Predicting the Extreme-UV and Lyman-α Fluxes Received by Exoplanets from their Host Stars

SOLSPEC MEASUREMENT OF THE SOLAR ABSOLUTE SPECTRAL IRRADIANCE FROM 165 to 2900 nm ON BOARD THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION

Solar EUV Spectral Irradiance: Measurements. Frank Eparvier

NICMOS Focus Field Variations (FFV) and Focus Centering

Spectral Irradiance reconstructions

CYCLIC AND LONG-TERM VARIATION OF SUNSPOT MAGNETIC FIELDS

2. What is a phytoplankton bloom and when does it generally occur in the North Atlantic?

Spectropolarimetry of Beta Lyrae: Constraining the Location of the Hot Spot and Jets

Derivation of the Solar Plage Index using the Flare Monitoring Telescope at the Hida Observatory

ANNUAL CLIMATE REPORT 2016 SRI LANKA

The Solar Physics Research Integrated Network Group SPRING

The Waldmeier Discontinuity

Real Astronomy from Virtual Observatories

OPTIMISING THE TEMPORAL AVERAGING PERIOD OF POINT SURFACE SOLAR RESOURCE MEASUREMENTS FOR CORRELATION WITH AREAL SATELLITE ESTIMATES

Part III: Circumstellar Properties of Intermediate-Age PMS Stars

Jacques M. Beckers Advanced Development Program National Optical Astronomy Observatory * Tucson, Arizona 85726

Astro 210 Lecture 3 Jan 22, 2018

Updating the Historical Sunspot Record

Comparison of F 10.7 and Coronal EUV Emission using DEMs

Inverse Correlations between Daily Average Energy of Global 0.01 to 1 M Earthquakes and Solar Flux Units: Possible Source of Coupling

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 29 Jan 2013

Decadal variability in the Earth s reflectance as observed by Earthshine Enric Pallé

A Random Walk Through Astrometry

Determining the magnitudes and spectral types of the components of the binary Mira X Ophiuchi

LONG-TERM VARIATIONS OF SOLAR MAGNETIC FIELDS DERIVED FROM GEOMAGNETIC DATA K.Georgieva 1, B.Kirov 1, Yu.A.Nagovitsyn 2

Solar Cycle 24 Variability Observed by Aura OMI Matthew DeLand and Sergey Marchenko Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI)

ON THE SPECTRAL STUDY OF SUNSPOT NUMBER AND SOLAR RADIO FLUX BETWEEN 600 AND 9400 MHz BY D. R. K. RAO ABSTRACT

Does Building a Relative Sunspot Number Make Sense? A Qualified Yes

The Extreme Solar Activity during October November 2003

SMA Memo 164. Systematic shift in 225 GHz optical depth measurements on Maunakea

Examination of the solar cycle variation of fof2 for cycles 22 and 23

Exoplanets Direct imaging. Direct method of exoplanet detection. Direct imaging: observational challenges

TRENDS IN DIRECT NORMAL SOLAR IRRADIANCE IN OREGON FROM

PART 3 Galaxies. Gas, Stars and stellar motion in the Milky Way

Next quiz: Monday, October 24

Geomagnetic Calibration of Sunspot Numbers. Leif Svalgaard HEPL, Stanford University SSN-Workshop, Sunspot, NM, Sept. 2011

A down-to-earth guide to high-resolution solar observations. Kevin Reardon National Solar Observatory

Southern African Large Telescope

Solar Flare Durations

THE OBSERVATION AND ANALYSIS OF STELLAR PHOTOSPHERES

McMath-Pierce Adaptive Optics Overview. Christoph Keller National Solar Observatory, Tucson

Cross-calibration of Geostationary Satellite Visible-channel Imagers Using the Moon as a Common Reference

TEACHER VERSION: Suggested student responses are included. Seasonal Cycles: the North Atlantic Phytoplankton Bloom

Measurement of the stellar irradiance

Comparison of Solar Minima Using Solar Ultraviolet Irradiance Data

Progress Towards an Absolute Calibration of Lunar Irradiance at Reflected Solar Wavelengths

Measuring the Redshift of M104 The Sombrero Galaxy

Performance Assessment of Hargreaves Model in Estimating Global Solar Radiation in Sokoto, Nigeria

Lecture 6: Continuum Opacity and Stellar Atmospheres

EAS 535 Laboratory Exercise Solar Radiation

COMMON SPHINX AND RHESSI OBSERVATIONS OF

Integrating the Solar Spectrum

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 12 Jan 2011

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 28 Feb 2003

The x Factor: Determining the Strength of Activity in Low-Mass Dwarfs

Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 Why study the sun?

Final report on the operation of a Campbell Scientific CS135 ceilometer at Chilbolton Observatory

Exploiting the Magnetic Origin of Solar Activity in Forecasting Thermospheric Density Variations

Comparing the year 2017 Total Ozone Column measurements at Uccle and Diekirch

Geomagnetic Calibration of Sunspot Numbers

Overview of the NASA Solar Irradiance Science Team (SIST) Program

MERIS, A-MODIS, SeaWiFS, AATSR and PARASOL over the Salar de Uyuni March 2006 MAVT 2006 Marc Bouvet, ESA/ESTEC

Galaxy Metallicity: What Oxygen Tells Us About The Lifecycles of Galaxies Designed by Prof Jess Werk, modified by Marie Wingyee Lau

O 5+ at a heliocentric distance of about 2.5 R.

Solar radiation analysis and regression coefficients for the Vhembe Region, Limpopo Province, South Africa

COMPARISON AMONG Ca ii K SPECTROHELIOGRAM TIME SERIES WITH AN APPLICATION TO SOLAR ACTIVITY STUDIES

Astronomy 1504/15014 Section 20

not for commercial-scale installations. Thus, there is a need to study the effects of snow on

Chapter 5 Light and Matter: Reading Messages from the Cosmos. How do we experience light? Colors of Light. How do light and matter interact?

Transcription:

... arxiv:1702.00838v1 [astro-ph.sr] 2 Feb 2017 Ca II K 1-Å Emission Index Composites Luca Bertello, Andrew R. Marble, & Alexei A. Pevtsov National Solar Observatory January 2, 2018 Technical Report No. NSO/NISP-2017-001

Ca II K 1-Å Emission Index Composites 1 Abstract We describe here a procedure to combine measurements in the 393.37 nm Ca II K spectral line taken at different observatories. Measurements from the National Solar Observatory (NSO) Integrated Sunlight Spectrometer (ISS) on the Synoptic Optical Long-term Investigations of the Sun (SOLIS) telescope, the NSO/Sac Peak Ca II K-Line Monitoring Program, and Ca II K filtergrams from Kodaikanal Solar Observatory (KKL) are merged together to create a pair of composites of the Ca II K 1- Å emission index. These composites are publicly available from the SOLIS website at http://solis.nso.edu/0/iss/. 1 Introduction Measurements of the ionized Ca II K-line are one of the major resources for long-term studies of solar and stellar activity. They also play a critical role in many studies related to solar irradiance variability, particularly as a ground-based proxy to model the solar ultraviolet flux variation that may influence the Earth s climate. Full disk images of the Sun in Ca II K have been available from various observatories for more than 100 years, while synoptic Sun-as-a-star observations in Ca II K began in the early 1970s. In 1976, observations of the disk-integrated solar Ca II K-line began at the National Solar Observatory (NSO)/ Sacramento Peak (Sac Peak). After October 1, 2015, the NSO Ca II K-line series continued using the Integrated Sunlight Spectrometer (ISS) on the Synoptic Optical Long-term Investigations of the Sun (SOLIS) facility. The ISS has been in operation since late 2006 at NSO/Kitt Peak. In July 2014, SOLIS was relocated to a temporary facility in Tucson. In 2017, it will be moved to a new permanent location, which remains to be determined. The ISS obtains high (R 300,000) spectral resolution daily observations of the Sun as a star in nine different spectral bands that reside in a broad range of wavelengths (350 nm - 1100 nm), including the Ca II K band centered at 393.37 nm. Several K-line parameters, including the emission index and various measures of asymmetry, are computed from the calibrated Ca II K-line profiles. One of these parameters, the 1-Å Ca II K emission index, is defined as the equivalent width of a 1 angstrom band centered on the K-line core. Although the ISS was designed as a future replacement for Sac Peak K-line monitor, there are some differences in both the K-line profile observations and the parameter derivation. For example, ISS equivalent widths reflect a novel approach based on the Fourier components of the line profile (Bertello et al. 2011), and ISS intensity calibration employs a more sophisticated approach than that of the Sac Peak K-line monitor (Pevtsov, Bertello, and Marble, 2014). To ensure successful inter-calibration, Sac Peak K- line monitor and SOLIS/ISS co-observed over a 9-year period including different levels of solar activity. This report discusses the inter-calibration of time series from these two instruments to form a continuous time series of sun-as-a-star K-line observations. Figure 1 shows both ISS and Sac Peak 1-Å emission index time series, independently calibrated. There is an evident discrepancy between the two sets of values. 2 Correction to the Sac Peak Measurements Figure 2 shows the daily values of the 1-Å emission index derived from measurements taken on the same day, around local noon, at both sites. In addition to a different scaling, the Sac Peak values seem to have some additional unresolved calibration issues during the extended minimum

Ca II K 1-Å Emission Index Composites 2 0.110 0.105 Sac Peak ISS 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Figure 1: Comparison between independently calibrated daily Sac Peak (blue) and ISS (red) time series of the Ca II K 1-Å emission index. of cycle 23/24. From the second half of 2007 to the end of 2009, those values seem to deviate from the trend of the overall time series, as highlighted in the plot by the filled area colored in antique white. In particular, the Sac Peak 1-Å emission index seems to be slightly overestimated during that time. Assuming the same temporal trend for both data sets, we first fit a quadratic function to the ISS values over the time interval [2007,2011]. In Figure 2, this function is shown as a green curve. The ISS data are nicely distributed around this function, with very few outliers. The same function is then multiplied by 1.055 to model the Sac Peak data over the same time interval. The 1.055 scaling is determined empirically to provide the best fit with the ISS data. It is quite evident from a simple visual inspection of Figure 2, that the Sac Peak data between 2007.8 and the end of 2009 appear to systematically overestimate the emission index value. Although the exact reason for this discrepancy has not been found, it is possible that some instrumental effects have not been accounted for in the original calibration of these data. To correct those measurements, we multiply them by different scaling factors and determine the one that minimize the rms of the difference between the adjusted data and the model (green curve in Figure 2). The left panel of Figure 3 shows the results of using three different scaling factors. The middle plot shows an almost ideal value. The right panel illustrates in detail the determination of the optimal factor. Using a set of possible values between 0.97 and 1.00, the rms is calculated for each correction factor. The location corresponding to the minimum value in this curve is selected to be the optimal factor, which turned out to be 0.984. Figure 4 shows the corrected Sac Peak series, after the Sac Peak data between 2007.8 and 2010.0

Ca II K 1-Å Emission Index Composites 3 Sac Peak ISS 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Figure 2: Same day measurements taken at the two sites. Each time series has been independently calibrated, resulting in a slightly different scaling between the two data sets. The green curve shows the expected behavior of the 1-Å emission index during the extended minimum of solar cycle 23/24 according to the ISS data. During that time, highlighted by the antique white colored area, Sac Peak data show some unresolved calibration issues. have been multiplied by 0.984. Although the scatter of values is quite large compared to the corresponding ISS values, the trends of the two time series appear to be consistent. 3 Sac Peak and ISS Composite To combine Sac Peak K-line monitor and ISS data into a single time series, we use ISS as a reference. At the minimum of cycle 23, the 1-Å emission index from ISS is lower in amplitude as compared to Sac Peak data. To scale the Sac Peak values into the same scale as ISS, a simple linear regression between the two sets of quasi-simultaneous daily values is performed. Such a linear regression is shown in Figure 5. The correlation coefficient is 0.91, with a statistical significance much greater than 99.99%. The equation of this linear regression provides the necessary coefficients to convert the Sac Peak data into the same scale as ISS. This transformation is given by: SP ISS = (0.0062 ± 0.0015) + (0.8781 ± 0.0163) SP orig, where SP orig and SP ISS are the original and rescaled Sac Peak 1-Å emission index values, respectively. Figure 6 shows the rescaled Sac Peak 1-Å emission index after the above transformation was applied. The two data sets appear now to be fully consistent.

Ca II K 1-Å Emission Index Composites 4 x1.000 rms(x1000) = 1.088 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 1.10 1.05 Optimal factor: 0.984 x0.983 rms(x1000) = 0.834 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 rms x 1000 1.00 0.95 0.90 x0.975 rms(x1000) = 0.921 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 0.85 0.80 0.97 0.98 0.99 1.00 Correction factor Figure 3: Determination of the adjusting factor required to correct the Sac Peak data between 2007.8 and 2010.0, shown between the light-brown area. Left plot shows the results after multiplying those data by three different scaling factors. The right plot illustrates how different correction factors affect the rms of the difference between the data and the model. The correction factor minimizing the rms is selected to be the optimal factor. The Sac Peak and ISS composite is created using only a single observation (typically the one closest to local noon) from a single site per day. For days with both ISS and Sac Peak observations, those from the ISS are used. This composite (hereafter NSO) covers about 40 years of NSO integrated sunlight Ca II K observations, and is shown in Figure 7. 4 Kodaikanal and NSO Composite Monthly and yearly averages of the Ca II K plage index computed from the daily Ca II K full-disk measurements taken at the Kodaikanal Observatory are available since February 1907. They cover more than 100 years of observations, with a high duty cycle until 1999. Annual mean values from the NSO composite and the Kodaikanal time series between 1977 and 1999 are used here to derive the coefficients for the conversion of the Kodaikanal data into the NSO scale. Figure 8 shows the excellent correlation between the two time series of annual means. From the linear fit, we derive the following transformation from plage index to the NSO Ca II K 1-Å emission index: KKL NSO = (0.08217 ± 0.00049) + (0.00020 ± 0.00001) KKL orig, where KKL orig and KKL NSO are the original Kodaikanal plage index and rescaled emission index values, respectively. This transformation allows us to combine the two time series together to produce a single composite of the monthly average 1-Å emission index that goes back to January 1907. Data from the rescaled Kodaikanal series are used up to the end of 1987. Starting January 1988, the NSO values are used. The final composite is shown in Figure 9. 5 Conclusions An overlapping period of observations from December 2006 till October 2015 was used to establish scaling between time series of 1-Å emission index from the NSO Sac Peak K-line monitor and SOLIS/ISS. This enables a continuation of historical time series using ISS data. Annually averaged values of 1-Å emission index correlate strongly with other historical time series of plage index

Ca II K 1-Å Emission Index Composites 5 Sac Peak ISS 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Figure 4: Same as Figure 2, after the Sac Peak data between 2007.8 and 2010.0 have been multiplied by 0.984. (area of solar surface covered by the chromospheric plage). This allows for the formation of a proxy of 1-Å emission index from 1908 till present. References Bertello, L.; Pevtsov, A. A.; Harvey, J. W.; Toussaint, R. M. 2011, Solar Physics, Volume 272, Issue 2, pp.229-242. Pevtsov, A. A..; Bertello, L.; Marble, A. R. 2014, Astronomische Nachrichten, Vol.335, Issue 1, p.21.

Ca II K 1-Å Emission Index Composites 6 ISS r = 0.91 0.086 0.088 0.092 0.094 0.096 0.098 Sac Peak Figure 5: Scatter plot of ISS and Sac Peak same day measurements around noon local time. The high correlation between the two quantities is indicated by the correlation coefficient r. The coefficients from the linear regression are used to adjust the Sac Peak data into the ISS scale (see text).

Ca II K 1-Å Emission Index Composites 7 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Figure 6: Same as Figure 4, after the Sac Peak values have been converted into the ISS scale according to the equation given in the text.

Ca II K 1-Å Emission Index Composites 8 ISS + Sac Peak Composite 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Figure 7: Daily measurements of the NSO 1-Å emission index composite computed using data from observations taken at Sacramento Peak and with the ISS instrument.

Ca II K 1-Å Emission Index Composites 9 NSO r = 0.94 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 KKL plage Index Figure 8: Scatter plot of NSO and Kodaikanal (KKL) yearly average values. The regression line provides the coefficients for the transformation of the KKL plage index into a 1-Å emission index consistent with the NSO scale. The correlation coefficient r is statistically significant at a 99.9% level.

Ca II K 1-Å Emission Index Composites 10 NSO + KKL Composite 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Figure 9: Monthly values of the Ca II K 1-Å Kodaikanal measurements (KKL) are used. emission index composite. Data from NSO and