Quantum Symmetries in Free Probability Theory. Roland Speicher Queen s University Kingston, Canada

Similar documents
De Finetti theorems for a Boolean analogue of easy quantum groups

A NOTE ON FREE QUANTUM GROUPS

Quantum symmetries in free probability. Stephen Robert Curran

free pros quantum groups QIT de Finetti -

Hadamard matrices and Compact Quantum Groups

Quantum Symmetric States

Structure of Compact Quantum Groups A u (Q) and B u (Q) and their Isomorphism Classification

arxiv: v1 [math.qa] 11 Dec 2017

Dual Temperley Lieb basis, Quantum Weingarten and a conjecture of Jones

Quantum Symmetric States on Free Product C -Algebras

THE HYPEROCTAHEDRAL QUANTUM GROUP

QUANTUM AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS OF HOMOGENEOUS GRAPHS

Plan 1 Motivation & Terminology 2 Noncommutative De Finetti Theorems 3 Braidability 4 Quantum Exchangeability 5 References

By Teodor Banica 1, Stephen Curran and Roland Speicher 2 Cergy-Pontoise University, UCLA and Queen s University

QUANTUM PERMUTATIONS, HADAMARD MATRICES, AND THE SEARCH FOR MATRIX MODELS

Quantum automorphism groups of homogeneous graphs

A non-commutative notion of separate continuity

HALF-COMMUTATIVE ORTHOGONAL HOPF ALGEBRAS

arxiv: v1 [math.oa] 20 Jul 2015

Free Probability Theory and Random Matrices. Roland Speicher Queen s University Kingston, Canada

Free Probability Theory and Non-crossing Partitions. Roland Speicher Queen s University Kingston, Canada

Quantum Field Theory III

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 30 Mar 2018

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 5 Dec 2017

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)

Linear Equations and Matrix

QUANTUM AUTOMORPHISMS OF TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS AND FREE HYPERGEOMETRIC LAWS

Boolean Inner-Product Spaces and Boolean Matrices

Categorical quantum mechanics

MAXIMAL TORUS THEORY FOR COMPACT QUANTUM GROUPS

Linear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 1

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: tensor, rank k tensor, Young tableau, Young diagram, hook, hook length, factors over hooks rule

From random matrices to free groups, through non-crossing partitions. Michael Anshelevich

The semantics of algebraic quantum mechanics and the role of model theory.

Subfactors and Modular Tensor Categories

3 Representations of finite groups: basic results

The geometrical semantics of algebraic quantum mechanics

Infinite-dimensional Categorical Quantum Mechanics

Actions of Compact Quantum Groups I

DS-GA 1002 Lecture notes 0 Fall Linear Algebra. These notes provide a review of basic concepts in linear algebra.

CUT-OFF FOR QUANTUM RANDOM WALKS. 1. Convergence of quantum random walks

Exercises on chapter 0

Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups

Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles

Coarse geometry and quantum groups

b c a Permutations of Group elements are the basis of the regular representation of any Group. E C C C C E C E C E C C C E C C C E

CS 246 Review of Linear Algebra 01/17/19

Linear Algebra Notes. Lecture Notes, University of Toronto, Fall 2016

Non-Commutative Covariant Differential Calculi on Quantum Spaces and Quantum Groups

Quantum Symmetries in Free Probability

1 Matrices and Systems of Linear Equations. a 1n a 2n

Linear Algebra March 16, 2019

Lecture 5: Sept. 19, 2013 First Applications of Noether s Theorem. 1 Translation Invariance. Last Latexed: September 18, 2013 at 14:24 1

FREE PROBABILITY THEORY

Product type actions of compact quantum groups

Free probability and quantum information

The Free Central Limit Theorem: A Combinatorial Approach

Assignment 10. Arfken Show that Stirling s formula is an asymptotic expansion. The remainder term is. B 2n 2n(2n 1) x1 2n.

Topological field theories and fusion categories. Scott Morrison. Sydney Quantum Information Workshop 3 February

Introduction to Group Theory

Rotational motion of a rigid body spinning around a rotational axis ˆn;

1.8 Dual Spaces (non-examinable)

Math 52H: Multilinear algebra, differential forms and Stokes theorem. Yakov Eliashberg

Unitary t-designs. Artem Kaznatcheev. February 13, McGill University

Almost periodic functionals

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: so(2n), so(2n+1), symplectic algebra sp(2n)

The origin of pictures: near rings and K 3 Z

SPECTRAL MEASURE BLOWUP FOR BASIC HADAMARD SUBFACTORS

Example Linear Algebra Competency Test

ANNALESDEL INSTITUTFOURIER

J þ in two special cases

CS286.2 Lecture 13: Quantum de Finetti Theorems

Thus we get. ρj. Nρj i = δ D(i),j.

Abstract Convexity: Results and Speculations

3 (Maths) Linear Algebra

Modular Categories and Applications I

7th focused semester on Quantum Groups

Introduction to compact (matrix) quantum groups and Banica Speicher (easy) quantum groups

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Rigid Body Motion Introduction + Math Review

Matrices and Vectors

MATH 583A REVIEW SESSION #1

Lecture 11. Linear systems: Cholesky method. Eigensystems: Terminology. Jacobi transformations QR transformation

LUCK S THEOREM ALEX WRIGHT

STRUCTURE AND ISOMORPHISM CLASSIFICATION OF COMPACT QUANTUM GROUPS A u (Q) AND B u (Q)

Quivers of Period 2. Mariya Sardarli Max Wimberley Heyi Zhu. November 26, 2014

[Disclaimer: This is not a complete list of everything you need to know, just some of the topics that gave people difficulty.]

Freeness and the Transpose

CURRICULUM VITAE - TEODOR BANICA

REPRESENTATION THEORY NOTES FOR MATH 4108 SPRING 2012

CSC Linear Programming and Combinatorial Optimization Lecture 10: Semidefinite Programming

On the Shadow Geometries of W (23, 16)

BPS states, permutations and information

FREE PROBABILITY THEORY

Towards a modular functor from quantum higher Teichmüller theory

The Waring rank of the Vandermonde determinant

Second Order Freeness and Random Orthogonal Matrices

A PRIMER ON SESQUILINEAR FORMS

MATH 320, WEEK 7: Matrices, Matrix Operations

Free Probability Theory and Random Matrices. Roland Speicher Queen s University Kingston, Canada

Linear Algebra Review. Vectors

Transcription:

Quantum Symmetries in Free Probability Theory Roland Speicher Queen s University Kingston, Canada

Quantum Groups are generalizations of groups G (actually, of C(G)) are supposed to describe non-classical symmetries are Hopf algebras, with some additional structure... 1

Quantum Groups: Deformation of Classical Symmetries G G q quantum groups are often deformations G q of classical groups, depending on some parameter q, such that for q 1, they go to the classical group G = G 1 G q and G 1 are incomparable, none is stronger than the other G 1 is supposed to act on commuting variables G q is the right replacement to act on q-commuting variables 2

Quantum Groups: Strengthening of Classical Symmetries G G + there are situations where a classical group G has a genuine non-commutative analogue G + (no interpolations) G + is stronger than G: G G + G acts on commuting variables G + is the right replacement for acting on non-commuting variables 3

We are interested in quantum versions of real compact matrix groups Think of orthogonal matrices permutation matrices Such quantum versions are captured by the notion of orthogonal Hopf algebra 4

Orthogonal Hopf Algebra is a C -algebra A, given with a system of n 2 self-adjoint generators u ij A (i, j = 1,..., n), subject to the following conditions: The inverse of u = (u ij ) is the transpose matrix u t = (u ji ). (u ij ) = Σ k u ik u kj defines a morphism : A A A. ε(u ij ) = δ ij defines a morphism ε : A C. S(u ij ) = u ji defines a morphism S : A A op. These are compact quantum groups in the sense of Woronowicz. 5

In the spirit of non-commutative geometry, we are thinking of A = C(G + ) as the continuous functions, generated by the coordinate functions u ij, on some (non-existing) quantum group G +, replacing a classical group G. 6

Quantum Orthogonal Group O + n (Wang 1995) The quantum orthogonal group A o (n) = C(O + n ) is the universal unital C -algebra generated by u ij (i, j = 1,..., n) subject to the relation u = (u ij ) n i,j=1 is an orthogonal matrix This means: for all i, j we have n k=1 u ik u jk = δ ij and n k=1 u ki u kj = δ ij 7

Quantum Permutation Group S + n (Wang 1998) The quantum permutation group A s (n) = C(S + n ) is the universal unital C -algebra generated by u ij (i, j = 1,..., n) subject to the relations u 2 ij = u ij = u ij for all i, j = 1,..., n each row and column of u = (u ij ) n i,j=1 is a partition of unity: n j=1 u ij = 1 n i=1 u ij = 1 8

Are there more of those? S n + O n + S n ) O n Are there more non-commutative versions G + n groups G n? of classical Actually, are there more nice non-commutative quantum groups G n? 9

Are there more of those? S n + G + n O n + S n G n O n Are there more non-commutative versions G + n groups G n? of classical Actually, are there more nice non-commutative quantum groups G n? 10

Are there more of those? S + n O + n G n S n O n Are there more non-commutative versions G + n groups G n? of classical Actually, are there more nice non-commutative quantum groups G n, stronger than S n? 11

How can we describe and understand intermediate quantum groups: S n G n O + n C(S n ) C(G n) C(O + n ) Deal with quantum groups by looking on their representations!!! 12

How can we describe and understand intermediate quantum groups: S n G n O + n C(S n ) C(G n) C(O + n ) Deal with quantum groups by looking on their representations!!! 13

Spaces of Intertwiners Associated to an orthogonal Hopf algebra (A = C(G n ), (u ij) n i,j=1 ) are the spaces of intertwiners: I G n (k, l) = {T : (C n ) k (C n ) l T u k = u l T } where u k is the n k n k matrix (u i1 j 1... u ik j k ) i1...i k,j 1...j k. u M n (A) u : C n C n A u k : (C n ) k (C n ) k A 14

I G n is Tensor Category with Duals Collection of vector spaces I G n (k, l) has the following properties: T, T I G n implies T T I G n. If T, T I G n are composable, then T T I G n. T I G n implies T I G n. id(x) = x is in I G n (1, 1). ξ = e i e i is in I G n (0, 2). 15

Quantum Groups Intertwiners The compact quantum group G n can actually be rediscovered from its space of intertwiners: There is a one-to-one correspondence between: orthogonal Hopf algebras C(O + n ) C(G n) C(S n ) tensor categories with duals I O + n I G n I Sn. 16

We denote by P (k, l) the set of partitions of the set with repetitions {1,..., k, 1,..., l}. Such a partition will be pictured as p = 1... k P 1... l where P is a diagram joining the elements in the same block of the partition. Example in P (5, 1): 1 2 3 4 5 1 17

Associated to any partition p P (k, l) is the linear map T p : (C n ) k (C n ) l given by T p (e i1... e ik ) = j 1...j l δ p (i, j) e j1... e jl where e 1,..., e n is the standard basis of C n. 18

T p : (C n ) k (C n ) l given by Examples: T p (e i1... e ik ) = j 1...j l δ p (i, j) e j1... e jl T { } (e a e b ) = e a e b T { } (e a e b ) = δ ab e a e a T { } (e a e b ) = δ ab e c e d cd 19

T p : (C n ) k (C n ) l given by Examples: T p (e i1... e ik ) = j 1...j l δ p (i, j) e j1... e jl T { } (e a e b ) = e a e b T { } (e a e b ) = δ ab e a e a T { } (e a e b ) = δ ab e c e d cd 20

T p : (C n ) k (C n ) l given by Examples: T p (e i1... e ik ) = j 1...j l δ p (i, j) e j1... e jl T { } (e a e b ) = e a e b T { } (e a e b ) = δ ab e a e a T { } (e a e b ) = δ ab e c e d cd 21

Intertwiners of (Quantum) Permutation and of (Quantum) Orthogonal Group S n + O n + S n ) O n I S + n I O + n I Sn ) I On 22

Intertwiners of (Quantum) Permutation and of (Quantum) Orthogonal Group Let NC(k, l) P (k, l) be the subset of noncrossing partitions. span(t p p NC(k, l)) = I S + n (k, l) I O + n (k, l) = span(t p p NC 2 (k, l)) span(t p p P (k, l)) = I Sn (k, l) I On (k, l) = span(t p p P 2 (k, l)) 23

Intertwiners of (Quantum) Permutation and of (Quantum) Orthogonal Group Let NC(k, l) P (k, l) be the subset of noncrossing partitions. span(t p p NC(k, l)) = I S + n (k, l) I O + n (k, l) = span(t p p NC 2 (k, l)) span(t p p P (k, l)) = I Sn (k, l) I On (k, l) = span(t p p P 2 (k, l)) 24

Intertwiners of (Quantum) Permutation and of (Quantum) Orthogonal Group Let NC(k, l) P (k, l) be the subset of noncrossing partitions. span(t p p NC(k, l)) = I S + n (k, l) I O + n (k, l) = span(t p p NC 2 (k, l)) span(t p p P (k, l)) = I Sn (k, l) I On (k, l) = span(t p p P 2 (k, l)) 25

Easy Quantum Groups (Banica, Speicher 2009) A quantum group S n G n O n + is called easy when its associated tensor category is of the form I Sn = span(t p p P ) I G n = span(t p p P G ), I On = span(t p p NC 2 ) for a certain collection of subsets P G P. 26

Easy Quantum Groups (Banica, Speicher 2009) A quantum group S n G n O n + is called easy when its associated tensor category is of the form I Sn = span(t p p P ) I G n = span(t p p P G ), I On = span(t p p NC 2 ) for a certain collection of subsets P G P. 27

What are we interested in? classification of easy (and more general) quantum groups (Banica&S, Banica&Vergnioux, Banica&Curran&S) understanding of meaning/implications of symmetry under such quantum groups; in particular, under quantum permutations S + n, or quantum rotations O + n (Köstler&S, Curran, Banica&Curran&S) treating series of such quantum groups (like S n + or O n + ) as fundamental examples of non-commuting random matrices (Banica&Curran&S) 28

Classification Results The category of partitions P G P for an easy quantum group G n must satisfy: P G is stable by tensor product. P G is stable by composition. P G is stable by involution. P G contains the unit partition. P G contains the duality partition. 29

Classification Results There are: 6 Categories of Noncrossing Partitions and 6 Categories of Partitions containing Basic Crossing: { } singletons and pairings { } singletons and pairings (even part) { } all pairings { all partitions } { } all partitions (even part) { } with blocks of even size 30

Classification Results and thus: 6 free easy quantum groups S + n G + n O + n and 6 classical easy quantum groups S n G n O n { } singletons and pairings { } singletons and pairings (even part) { } all pairings { all partitions } { } all partitions (even part) { } with blocks of even size 31

Classification Results there are easy quantum groups which are neither classical nor free we have partial classification of them problematic are the ones of hyperoctahedral type (corresponding to partitions with blocks of even size) one can also ask whether there are any other (not necessarily easy) quantum groups of this sort, e.g.: can one classify all quantum rotations O n G n O + n 32

Quantum Symmetries A vector x = x 1. x n is (quantum) symmetric (with respect to some property) if y = ux = y 1. y n i.e. y i = n j=1 u ij x j satisfies the same property as x. 33

Quantum Exchangeability x 1,..., x n (A, ϕ) is (quantum) exchangeable if y 1,..., y n (C(S (+) n ) A, id ϕ) has the same distribution as x. Concretely this means n ϕ(x i1 x ik ) 1 (+) C(S n ) = u i1 j 1 u ik j k ϕ(x j1 x jk ) j 1,...,j k =1 34

de Finetti Theorem (de Finetti 1931, Hewitt, Savage 1955) The following are equivalent for an infinite sequence of classical, commuting random variables: the sequence is exchangeable (i.e., invariant under all S n ) the sequence is independent and identically distributed with respect to the conditional expectation E onto the tail σ- algebra of the sequence 35

Non-commutative de Finetti Theorem (Köstler, Speicher 2008) The following are equivalent for an infinite sequence of noncommutative random variables: the sequence is quantum exchangeable (i.e., invariant under all S + n ) the sequence is free and identically distributed with respect to the conditional expectation E onto the tail-algebra of the sequence 36

This explains occurrence of non-crossing pictures in free probability as emerging from the fact that free probability goes nicely with our quantum symmetries. 37

This explains occurrence of non-crossing pictures in free probability as emerging from the fact that free probability goes nicely with our quantum symmetries. Question Could it be that occurrence of planar pictures in subfactor theory emerges also somehow from the fact that subfactors have some nice relation with quantum permutations or alike symmetries? 38

Non-Commutative Random Matrices there exists, as for any compact quantum group, a unique Haar state on the easy quantum groups, thus one can integrate/average over the quantum groups actually: for the easy quantum groups, there exist nice and concrete formula for the calculation of this state: G n where W n is inverse of u i1 j 1 u ik j k du = p,q P G (k) p ker i q ker j G n (p, q) = n p q. W n (p, q), 39

Non-Commutative Random Matrices this allows the calculation of distributions of functions of our non-commutative random matrices G n, in the limit n in particular, in analogy to Diaconis&Shashahani, we have results about the asymptotic distribution of Tr(u k ) note: in the classical case, knowledge about traces of powers of the matrices is the same as knowledge about the eigenvalues of the matrices 40

Question What are eigenvalues of a non-commutative (random) matrix? 41

42