k-difference cordial labeling of graphs

Similar documents
Difference Cordial Labeling of Graphs Obtained from Double Snakes

Super Mean Labeling of Some Classes of Graphs

On Odd Sum Graphs. S.Arockiaraj. Department of Mathematics. Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Sivakasi , Tamilnadu, India. P.

Odd-even sum labeling of some graphs

k-remainder Cordial Graphs

SQUARE DIFFERENCE 3-EQUITABLE LABELING FOR SOME GRAPHS. Sattur , TN, India. Sattur , TN, India.

Sum divisor cordial labeling for star and ladder related graphs

Harmonic Mean Labeling for Some Special Graphs

Odd Sum Labeling of Tree Related Graphs

Further results on relaxed mean labeling

Total Mean Cordiality ofk c n + 2K 2

SUPER ROOT SQUARE MEAN LABELING OF SOME NEW GRAPHS

Integral Root Labeling of Graphs 1 V.L. Stella Arputha Mary & 2 N. Nanthini

One Modulo Three Harmonic Mean Labeling of Graphs

SUPER MEAN NUMBER OF A GRAPH

Some Results on Super Mean Graphs

Super Root Square Mean Labeling Of Disconnected Graphs

Further Results on Square Sum Graph

SOME EXTENSION OF 1-NEAR MEAN CORDIAL LABELING OF GRAPHS. Sattur , TN, India.

Some New Results on Super Stolarsky-3 Mean Labeling of Graphs

Graceful Labeling for Complete Bipartite Graphs

Super Fibonacci Graceful Labeling of Some Special Class of Graphs

Skolem Difference Mean Graphs

ROOT SQUARE MEAN GRAPHS OF ORDER 5

Mean Cordial Labeling of Tadpole and Olive Tree

ODD HARMONIOUS LABELING OF PLUS GRAPHS

Complementary Signed Dominating Functions in Graphs

Graceful Related Labeling and its Applications

Magic Graphoidal on Class of Trees A. Nellai Murugan

Super Fibonacci Graceful Labeling

On (k, d)-multiplicatively indexable graphs

Power Mean Labeling of Identification Graphs

Given any simple graph G = (V, E), not necessarily finite, and a ground set X, a set-indexer

Power Mean Labeling of some Standard Graphs

Graceful Labeling of Some Theta Related Graphs

d 2 -coloring of a Graph

Root Square Mean Labeling of Some More. Disconnected Graphs

Further Studies on the Sparing Number of Graphs

Combinatorial Labelings Of Graphs

On Graceful Labeling of Some Bicyclic Graphs

One Modulo Three Root Square Mean Labeling of Some Disconnected Graphs

Prime Cordial Labeling For Some Cycle Related Graphs

Research Article Some New Results on Prime Cordial Labeling

2 β 0 -excellent graphs

A Creative Review on Integer Additive Set-Valued Graphs

Q(a)- Balance Edge Magic of Sun family Graphs

Strong Integer Additive Set-valued Graphs: A Creative Review

Radio Number of Cube of a Path

Strong Integer Additive Set-valued Graphs: A Creative Review

The Exquisite Integer Additive Set-Labeling of Graphs

Elegant Labeled Graphs

Cycle decompositions of the complete graph

International Journal of Scientific Research and Reviews

On the Gracefulness of Cycle related graphs

Available Online through

Mixed cycle-e-super magic decomposition of complete bipartite graphs

arxiv: v2 [math.co] 26 Apr 2014

Pyramidal Sum Labeling In Graphs

On P 2 P n -Supermagic Labeling of Edge Corona Product of Cycle and Path Graph

Graceful Tree Conjecture for Infinite Trees

A Note on Disjoint Dominating Sets in Graphs

A Study on Integer Additive Set-Graceful Graphs

University of Alabama in Huntsville Huntsville, AL 35899, USA

Double domination in signed graphs

ON SUPER HERONIAN MEAN LABELING OF GRAPHS

On Extremal Value Problems and Friendly Index Sets of Maximal Outerplanar Graphs

Graceful Labelings. Charles Michael Cavalier. Bachelor of Science Louisiana State University 2006

Observation 4.1 G has a proper separation of order 0 if and only if G is disconnected.

On (Super) Edge-Magic Total Labeling of Subdivision of K 1,3

Lucky Edge Labeling of P n, C n and Corona of P n, C n

Decompositions of Balanced Complete Bipartite Graphs into Suns and Stars

Maximal Square Sum Subgraph of a Complete Graph

Chapter 3. Antimagic Gl'aphs

STRUCTURE OF THE SET OF ALL MINIMAL TOTAL DOMINATING FUNCTIONS OF SOME CLASSES OF GRAPHS

Absolutely Harmonious Labeling of Graphs

Dominating Broadcasts in Graphs. Sarada Rachelle Anne Herke

Malaya J. Mat. 2(3)(2014)

H-E-Super magic decomposition of graphs

K-Total Product Cordial Labelling of Graphs

Graphoidal Tree d - Cover

Group connectivity of certain graphs

arxiv: v2 [math.gr] 17 Dec 2017

Super edge-magic labeling of graphs: deficiency and maximality

Equivalence Resolving Partition of a Graph

Even Star Decomposition of Complete Bipartite Graphs

Chapter V DIVISOR GRAPHS

PAijpam.eu SOME NEW SUM PERFECT SQUARE GRAPHS S.G. Sonchhatra 1, G.V. Ghodasara 2

Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society

4-Cycle Group-Divisible Designs with Two Associate Classes

Edge Fixed Steiner Number of a Graph

Topological Integer Additive Set-Graceful Graphs

A LOWER BOUND FOR RADIO k-chromatic NUMBER OF AN ARBITRARY GRAPH

Graceful polynomials of small degree

A Quadratic Integer Programming with Application in Chaotic Mappings of Complete Multipartite Graphs. Technical Report

SEMI-STRONG SPLIT DOMINATION IN GRAPHS. Communicated by Mehdi Alaeiyan. 1. Introduction

On cordial labeling of hypertrees

Doyen-Wilson results for odd length cycle systems

Nowhere zero flow. Definition: A flow on a graph G = (V, E) is a pair (D, f) such that. 1. D is an orientation of G. 2. f is a function on E.

Graph homomorphism into an odd cycle

Transcription:

International J.Math. Combin. Vol.(016), 11-11 k-difference cordial labeling of graphs R.Ponraj 1, M.Maria Adaickalam and R.Kala 1.Department of Mathematics, Sri Paramakalyani College, Alwarkurichi-6741, India.Department of Economics and Statistics, Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai-600 006, India.Department of Mathematics, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli-6701, India E-mail: ponrajmaths@gmail.com, mariaadaickalam@gmail.com, karthipyi91@yahoo.co.in Abstract: In this paper we introduce new graph labeling called k-difference cordial labeling. Let G be a (p,q) graph and k be an integer, k V (G). Let f : V (G) {1,,, k} be a map. For each edge uv, assign the label f(u) f(v). f is called a k- difference cordial labeling of G if v f (i) v f (j) 1 and e f (0) e f (1) 1 where v f (x) denote the number of vertices labelled with x, e f (1) and e f (0) respectively denote the number of edges labelled with 1 and not labelled with 1. A graph with a k-difference cordial labeling is called a k-difference cordial graph. In this paper we investigate k-difference cordial labeling behavior of star, m copies of star and we prove that every graph is a subgraph of a connected k-difference cordial graph. Also we investigate -difference cordial labeling behavior of some graphs. Key Words: Path, complete graph, complete bipartite graph, star, k-difference cordial labeling, Smarandachely k-difference cordial labeling. AMS(010): 05C78. 1. Introduction All graphs in this paper are finite and simple. The graph labeling is applied in several areas of sciences and few of them are coding theory, astronomy, circuit design etc. For more details refer Gallian []. Let G 1, G respectively be (p 1, q 1 ), (p, q ) graphs. The corona of G 1 with G, G 1 G is the graph obtained by taking one copy of G 1 and p 1 copies of G and joining the i th vertex of G 1 with an edge to every vertex in the i th copy of G. The subdivision graph S (G) of a graph G is obtained by replacing each edge uv by a path uwv. The union of two graphs G 1 and G is the graph G 1 G with V (G 1 G ) = V (G 1 ) V (G ) and E (G 1 G ) = E (G 1 ) E (G ). In [1], Cahit introduced the concept of cordial labeling of graphs. Recently Ponraj et al. [4], introduced difference cordial labeling of graphs. In this way we introduce k-difference cordial labeling of graphs. Also in this paper we investigate the k-difference cordial labeling behavior of star, m copies of star etc. x denote the smallest integer less than or equal to x. Terms and results not here follows from Harary []. 1 Received June 4, 015, Accepted May 6, 016.

1 R.Ponraj, M.Maria Adaickalam and R.Kala. k-difference Cordial Labeling Definition.1 Let G be a (p, q) graph and k be an integer k V (G). Let f : V (G) {1,,, k} be a function. For each edge uv, assign the label f(u) f(v). f is called a k-difference cordial labeling of G if v f (i) v f (j) 1 and e f (0) e f (1) 1, and Smarandachely k-difference cordial labeling if v f (i) v f (j) > 1 or e f (0) e f (1) > 1, where v f (x) denote the number of vertices labelled with x, e f (1) and e f (0) respectively denote the number of edges labelled with 1 and not labelled with 1. A graph with a k-difference cordial labeling or Smarandachely k-difference cordial labeling is called a k-difference cordial graph or Smarandachely k-difference cordial graph, respectively. Remark. (1) p-difference cordial labeling is simply a difference cordial labeling; () -difference cordial labeling is a cordial labeling. Theorem. Every graph is a subgraph of a connected k-difference cordial graph. Proof Let G be (p, q) graph. Take k copies of graph K p. Let G i be the i th copy of K p. Take k copies of the K ( p ) and the ith copies of the K ( p ) is denoted by G i. Let V (G i) = {u j i : 1 j k, 1 i p}. Let V (G i ) = {vj i : 1 j k, 1 i p}. The vertex and edge set of super graph G of G is as follows: Let V (G ) = k V (G i ) k V (G i ) {w i : 1 i k} {w}. E(G ) = k i=1 i=1 i=1 E(G i ) {u j 1 vj i : 1 i ( ) p, 1 j k 1} {u k 1 w, wvi k : 1 i ( p ) } {u j p w j : 1 j k} {u j uj+1 : 1 j k 1} {w 1 w }. Assign the label i to the vertices of G i, 1 i k. Then assign the label i + 1 to the vertices of G i, 1 i k 1. Assign the label 1 to the vertices of G k. Then assign to the vertex w. Finally assign the label i to the vertex w i, 1 i k. Clearly v f (i) = p + ( p ) + 1, i = 1,,...,k, v f () = p + ( ) p + and ef (1) = k ( ) p + k, ef (0) = k ( p ) + k + 1. Therefore G is a k-difference cordial graph. Theorem.4 If k is even, then k-copies of star K 1,p is k-difference cordial. Proof Let G i be the i th copy of the star K 1,p. Let V (G i ) = {u j, v j i : 1 j k, 1 i p} and E(G i ) = {u j v j i : 1 j k, 1 i p}. Assign the label i to the vertex u j, 1 j k. Assign the label i + 1 to the pendent vertices of G i, 1 i k. Assign the label k i + 1 to the pendent vertices of G k +i, 1 i k 1. Finally assign the label 1 to all the pendent vertices of the star G k. Clearly, v f (i) = p + 1, 1 i k, e f (0) = e f (1) = kp. Therefore f is a k-difference cordial labeling of k-copies of the star K 1,p. Theorem.5 If n 0 (mod k) and k 6, then the star K 1,n is not k-difference cordial. Proof Let n = kt. Suppose f is a k-difference cordial labeling of K 1,n. Without loss of generality, we assume that the label of central vertex is r, 1 r k. Clearly v f (i) = t,

k-difference cordial labeling of graphs 1 1 i n and i r, v f (r) = t + 1. Then e f (1) t and e f (0) (k )t. Now e f (0) (k )t t (k 4)t, which is a contradiction. Thus f is not a k-difference cordial. Next we investigate -difference cordial behavior of some graph.. -Difference Cordial Graphs First we investigate the path. Theorem.1 Any path is -difference cordial. Proof Let u 1 u...u n be the path P n. The proof is divided into cases following. Case 1. n 0 (mod 6). Let n = 6t. Assign the label 1,,, 1,, to the first consecutive 6 vertices of the path P n. Then assign the label,, 1,,, 1 to the next 6 consecutive vertices. Then assign the label 1,,, 1,, to the next six vertices and assign the label,, 1,,, 1 to the next six vertices. Then continue this process until we reach the vertex u n. Case. n 1 (mod 6). This implies n 1 0 (mod 6). Assign the label to the vertices of u i, 1 i n 1 as in case 1. If u n 1 receive the label, then assign the label to the vertex u n ; if u n 1 receive the label 1, then assign the label 1 to the vertex u n. Case. n (mod 6). Therefore n 1 1 (mod 6). As in case, assign the label to the vertices u i, 1 i n 1. Next assign the label to u n. Case 4. n (mod 6). This forces n 1 (mod 6). Assign the label to the vertices u 1, u,... u n 1 as in case. Assign the label 1 or to u n according as the vertex u n receive the label or 1. Case 5. n 4 (mod 6). This implies n 1 (mod 6). As in case 4, assign the label to the vertices u 1, u,, u n 1. Assign the label or 1 to the vertex u n according as the vertex u n 1 receive the label 1 to. Case 6. n 5 (mod 6). This implies n 1 4 (mod 6). Assign the label to the vertices u 1, u,, u n 1 as in Case 5. Next assign the label to u n. Example. A -difference cordial labeling of the path P 9 is given in Figure 1. 1 1 1 Figure 1

14 R.Ponraj, M.Maria Adaickalam and R.Kala Corollary. If n 0, (mod 4), then the cycle C n is -difference cordial. Proof The vertex labeling of the path given in Theorem.1 is also a -difference cordial labeling of the cycle C n. Theorem.4 The star K 1,n is -difference cordial iff n {1,,, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9}. Proof Let V (K 1,n ) = {u, u i : 1 i n} and E(K 1,n ) = {uu i : 1 i n}. Our proof is divided into cases following. Case 1. n {1,,, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9}. Assign the label 1 to u. The label of u i is given in Table 1. n\u i u 1 u u u 4 u 5 u 6 u 7 u 8 u 9 1 1 Case. n / {1,,, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9}. 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 9 1 1 Table 1 Let f(u) = x where x {1,, }. To get the edge label 1, the pendent vertices receive the label either x 1 or x + 1. Subcase 1. n = t. Subcase 1a. x = 1 or x =. When x = 1, e f (1) = t or t + 1 according as the pendent vertices receives t s or (t+1) s. Therefore e f (0) = t or t 1. Thus e f (0) e f (1) = t > 1, t > 4 a contradiction. When x =, e f (1) = t or t + 1 according as the pendent vertices receives t s or (t+1) s. Therefore e f (0) = t or t 1. Thus e f (0) e f (1) = t or t. Therefore, e f (0) e f (1) > 1, a contradiction. Subcase 1b. x =. In this case, e f (1) = t or t + 1 according as pendent vertices receives t s or (t-) s. Therefore e f (0) = t or t 1. e f (1) e f (0) = t or t + as t >. Therefore, e f (0) e f (1) > 1, a contradiction. Subcase. n = t + 1.

k-difference cordial labeling of graphs 15 Subcase a. x = 1 or. Then e f (1) = t or t +1 according as pendent vertices receives t s or (t+1) s. Therefore e f (0) = t + 1 or t. e f (0) e f (1) = t + 1 or t 1 as t >. Therefore, e f (0) e f (1) >, a contradiction. Subcase b. x =. In this case e f (1) = t or t + 1 according as pendent vertices receives t s 1 and t s and t s 1 and (t+) s. Therefore e f (0) = t + 1 or t. e f (1) e f (0) = t 1 or t as t >. Therefore, e f (0) e f (1) > 1, a contradiction. Subcase. n = t +. Subcase a. x = 1 or. This implies e f (1) = t + 1 and e f (0) = t + 1. e f (0) e f (1) = t as t >. Therefore, e f (0) e f (1) > 1, a contradiction. Subcase b. x =. This implies e f (1) = t + and e f (0) = t. e f (1) e f (0) = t + as t > 1. Therefore, e f (1) e f (0) > 1, a contradiction. Thus K 1,n is -difference cordial iff n {1,,, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9}. Next, we research the complete graph. Theorem.5 The complete graph K n is -difference cordial if and only if n {1,,, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10}. Proof Let u i, 1 i n be the vertices of K n. The -difference cordial labeling of K n, n {1,,, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10} is given in Table. n\u i u 1 u u u 4 u 5 u 6 u 7 u 8 u 9 u 10 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 6 1 1 7 1 1 1 9 1 1 1 10 1 1 1 Table Assume n / {1,,, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10}. Suppose f is a -difference cordial labeling of K n. Case 1. n 0 (mod ). Let n = t, t >. Then v f (0) = v f (1) = v f () = t. This implies e f (0) = ( t ) + ( t ) + ( t ) +

16 R.Ponraj, M.Maria Adaickalam and R.Kala t = 5t t. Therefore e f (1) = t + t = t. e f (0) e f (1) = 5t t t > 1 as t >, a contradiction. Case. n 1 (mod ). Let n = t + 1, t >. Subcase 1. v f (1) = t + 1. Therefore v f () = v f () = t. This forces e f (0) = ( ) ( t+1 + t ) ( + t ) + t(t + 1) = 1 (5t + t). e f (1) = t(t + 1) + t = t + t. Then e f (0) e f (1) = 1 (5t + t) (t + t) > 1 as t >, a contradiction. Subcase. v f () = t + 1. Similar to Subcase 1. Subcase. v f () = t + 1. Therefore v f (1) = v f () = t. In this case e f (0) = 5t +t and e f (1) = t(t + 1) + t(t + 1) = t + t. This implies e f (0) e f (1) = 5t +t (t + t) > 1 as t >, a contradiction. Case. n (mod ). Let n = t +, t 1. Subcase 1. v f (1) = t. Therefore v f () = v f () = t + 1. This gives e f (0) = ( t ) + ( t+1 ) + ( t+1 ) + t(t + 1) = 5t +t and e f (1) = t(t+1)+(t+1) = t +t+1. This implies e f (0) e f (1) = 5t +t (t +t+1) > 1 as t 1, a contradiction. Subcase. v f () = t. Similar to Subcase 1. Subcase. v f () = t. Therefore v f (1) = v f () = t + 1. In this case e f (0) = ( ) ( t+1 + t+1 ) ( + t ) + (t + 1)(t + 1) = 5t +5t+ and e f (1) = t(t + 1) + t(t + 1) = t + t. This implies e f (0) e f (1) = 5t +5t+ (t + t) > 1 as t 1, a contradiction. Theorem.6 If m is even, the complete bipartite graph K m,n (m n) is -difference cordial. Proof Let V (K m,n ) = {u i, v j : 1 i m, 1 j n} and E(K m,n ) = {u i v j : 1 i

k-difference cordial labeling of graphs 17 m, 1 j n}. Define a map f : V (K m,n ) {1,, } by f(u i ) = 1, 1 i m f(u m +i ) =, 1 i m f(v i ) =, 1 i f(v +i ) = 1, 1 i m 1 if m + n 1, (mod ) 1 i m if m + n 0 (mod ) f(v m 1+i) =, 1 i n + m + 1 if m + n 1, (mod ) f(v m+i) =, 1 i n + m if m + n 0 (mod ) Since e f (0) = e f (1) = mn, f is a -difference cordial labeling of K m,n. Example.7 A -difference cordial labeling of K 5,8 is given in Figure. 1 1 1 1 Next, we research some corona of graphs. Figure Theorem.8 The comb P n K 1 is -difference cordial. Proof Let P n be the path u 1 u... u n. Let V (P n K 1 ) = V (P n ) {v i : 1 i n} and E(P n K 1 ) = E(P n ) {u i v i : 1 i n}. Case 1. n 0 (mod 6). Define a map f : V (G) {1,, } by f(u 6i 5 ) = f(u 6i ) = 1, 1 i n 6 f(u 6i 4 ) = f(u 6i 1 ) =, 1 i n 6 f(u 6i ) = f(u 6i ) =, 1 i n 6. In this case, e f (0) = n 1 and e f (1) = n. Case. n 1 (mod 6). Assign the label to the vertices u i, v i (1 i n 1) as in case 1. Then assign the labels 1, to the vertices u n, v n respectively. In this case, e f (0) = n 1, e f (1) = n.

18 R.Ponraj, M.Maria Adaickalam and R.Kala Case. n (mod 6). As in Case, assign the label to the vertices u i, v i (1 i n 1). Then assign the labels, to the vertices u n, v n respectively. In this case, e f (0) = n, e f (1) = n 1. Case 4. n (mod 6). Assign the label to the vertices u i, v i (1 i n 1) as in case. Then assign the labels, 1 to the vertices u n, v n respectively. In this case, e f (0) = n 1, e f (1) = n. Case 5. n 4 (mod 6). As in Case 4, assign the label to the vertices u i, v i (1 i n 1). Then assign the labels, to the vertices u n, v n respectively. In this case, e f (0) = n 1, e f (1) = n. Case 6. n 5 (mod 6). Assign the label to the vertices u i, v i (1 i n 1) as in case 5. Then assign the labels, 1 to the vertices u n, v n respectively. In this case, e f (0) = n 1, e f (1) = n. Therefore P n K 1 is -difference cordial. Theorem.9 P n K 1 is -difference cordial. Proof Let P n be the path u 1 u u n. Let V (P n K 1 ) = V (P n ) {v i, w i : 1 i n} and E(P n K 1 ) = E(P n ) {u i v i, u i w i : 1 i n}. Case 1. n is even. Define a map f : V (P n K 1 ) {1,, } as follows: f(u i 1 ) = 1, 1 i n f(u i ) =, 1 i n f(v i 1 ) = 1, 1 i n f(v i ) =, 1 i n f(w i ) =, 1 i n. In this case, v f (1) = v f () = v f () = n, e f (0) = n and e f(1) = n 1. Case. n is odd. Define a map f : V (P n K 1 ) {1,, } by f(u 1 ) = 1, f(u ) =, f(u ) =, f(v 1 ) = f(v ) = 1, f(w 1 ) = f(w ) =, f(v ) = f(w ) =, f(u i+ ) =, 1 i n f(u i+ ) = 1, 1 i n f(v i+ ) =, 1 i n f(v i+ ) = 1, 1 i n f(w i+ ) =, 1 i n.

k-difference cordial labeling of graphs 19 Clearly, v f (1) = v f () = v f () = n, e f (0) = e f (1) = n 1. Next we research on quadrilateral snakes. Theorem.10 The quadrilateral snakes Q n is -difference cordial. Proof Let P n be the path u 1 u u n. Let V (Q n ) = V (P n ) {v i, w i : 1 i n 1} and E(Q n ) = E(P n ) {u i v i, v i w i, w i u i+1 : 1 i n 1}. Note that V (Q n ) = n and E(Q n ) = 4n 4. Assign the label 1 to the path vertices u i, 1 i n. Then assign the labels, to the vertices v i, w i 1 i n 1 respectively. Since v f (1) = n, v f () = v f () = n 1, e f (0) = e f (1) = n, f is a -difference cordial labeling. The next investigation is about graphs B n,n, S(K 1,n ), S(B n,n ). Theorem.11 The bistar B n,n is -difference cordial. Proof Let V (B n,n ) = {u, v, u i, v i : 1 i n} and E(B n,n ) = {uv, uu i, vv i : 1 i n}. Clearly B n,n has n + vertices and n + 1 edges. Case 1. n 0 (mod ). Assign the label 1, to the vertices u and v respectively. Then assign the label 1 to the vertices u i, v i (1 i n ). Assign the label to the vertices u n +i, v n +i (1 i n ). Finally assign the label to the vertices u n +i, vn +i (1 i n ). In this case e f(1) = n + 1 and e f (0) = n. Case. n 1 (mod ). Assign the labels to the vertices u, v, u i, v i (1 i n 1) as in Case 1. Then assign the label, to the vertices u n, v n respectively. In this case e f (1) = n and e f (0) = n + 1. Case. n (mod ). As in Case, assign the label to the vertices u, v, u i, v i (1 i n 1). Finally assign 1, to the vertices u n, v n respectively. In this case e f (1) = n and e f (0) = n + 1. Hence the star B n,n is -difference cordial. Theorem.1 The graph S(K 1,n ) is -difference cordial. Proof Let V (S(K 1,n )) = {u, u i, v i : 1 i n} and E(S(K 1,n )) = {uu i, u i v i : 1 i n}. Clearly S(K 1,n ) has n + 1 vertices and n edges. Case 1. n 0 (mod ). Define a map f : V (S(K 1,n )) {1,, } as follows: f(u) =, f(u i ) f(u t+i ) f(v i ) = 1, 1 i t =, 1 i t =, 1 i t f(v t+i ) = 1, 1 i t.

10 R.Ponraj, M.Maria Adaickalam and R.Kala Case. n 1 (mod ). As in Case 1, assign the label to the vertices u, u i, v i (1 i n 1). Then assign the label 1, to the vertices u n, v n respectively. Case. n (mod ). As in Case, assign the label to the vertices u, u i, v i (1 i n 1). Then assign the label, 1 to the vertices u n, v n respectively. f is a -difference cordial labeling follows from the following Table. Values of n v f (1) v f () v f () e f (0) e f (1) n = t t t + 1 t t t n = t + 1 t + 1 t + 1 t + 1 t + 1 t + 1 n = t + t + t + t + 1 t + t + Table Theorem.1 S(B n,n ) is -difference cordial. Proof Let V (S(B n,n )) = {u, w, v, u i, w i, v i, z i : 1 i n} and E(S(B n,n )) = {uw, wv, uu i, u i w i, vv i, v i z i : 1 i n}. Clearly S(B n,n ) has 4n + vertices and 4n + edges. Case 1. n 0 (mod ). Define a map f : V (S(B n,n )) {1,, } by f(u) = 1, f(w) =, f(v) =, f(w i ) = f(v i ) = f(z i ) =, 1 i n 1, 1 i n, 1 i n f(u i ) = 1, 1 i n f(u n +i ) =, 1 i n f(u n +i ) =, 1 i n. Case. n 1 (mod ). As in Case 1, assign the label to the vertices u, w, v, u i, v i, w i, z i (1 i n 1). Then assign the label 1,, 1, to the vertices u n, w n, v n, z n respectively. Case. n (mod ). As in Case, assign the label to the vertices u, w, v, u i, v i, w i, z i (1 i n 1). Then assign the label,, 1, to the vertices u n, w n, v n, z n respectively. f is a -difference cordial labeling follows from the following Table 4.

k-difference cordial labeling of graphs 11 Values of n v f (1) v f () v f () e f (0) e f (1) n 0 (mod ) 4n+ n 1 (mod ) 4n+5 n (mod ) 4n+4 4n+ 4n+ 4n+4 4n+ 4n+ 4n+1 4n+ 4n+ 4n+ 4n+ 4n+ 4n+ Table 4 Finally we investigate cycles C (t) 4. Theorem.14 C (t) 4 is -difference cordial. Proof Let u be the vertices of C (t) 4 and i th cycle of C (t) 4 be uu i 1 ui ui u. Define a map f from the vertex set of C (t) 4 to the set {1,, } by f(u) = 1, f(u i ) =, 1 i t, f(u i 1) = 1, 1 i t, f(u i ) =, 1 i t. Clearly v f(1) = t + 1, v f () = v f () = t and e f (0) = e f (1) = t. Hence f is -difference cordial. References [1] I.Cahit, Cordial Graphs: A weaker version of Graceful and Harmonious graphs, Ars Combin., (1987), 01-07. [] J.A.Gallian, A Dynamic survey of graph labeling, The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 17 (014) #Ds6. [] F.Harary, Graph Theory, Addision wesley, New Delhi (1969). [4] R.Ponraj, S.Sathish Narayanan and R.Kala, Difference cordial labeling of graphs, Global Journal of Mathematical Sciences: Theory and Practical, 5(01), 185-196.