Problem Set #3: AK models

Similar documents
Macroeconomic Theory Ph.D. Qualifying Examination Fall 2005 ANSWER EACH PART IN A SEPARATE BLUE BOOK. PART ONE: ANSWER IN BOOK 1 WEIGHT 1/3

The general Solow model

Suggested Solutions to Assignment 4 (REQUIRED) Submisson Deadline and Location: March 27 in Class

Solutions Problem Set 3 Macro II (14.452)

Cooperative Ph.D. Program in School of Economic Sciences and Finance QUALIFYING EXAMINATION IN MACROECONOMICS. August 8, :45 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

Midterm Exam. Macroeconomic Theory (ECON 8105) Larry Jones. Fall September 27th, Question 1: (55 points)

T. J. HOLMES AND T. J. KEHOE INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND PAYMENTS THEORY FALL 2011 EXAMINATION

Lecture Notes 3: Quantitative Analysis in DSGE Models: New Keynesian Model

Economics 8105 Macroeconomic Theory Recitation 6

ANSWERS TO EVEN NUMBERED EXERCISES IN CHAPTER 6 SECTION 6.1: LIFE CYCLE CONSUMPTION AND WEALTH T 1. . Let ct. ) is a strictly concave function of c

Problem Set 5. Graduate Macro II, Spring 2017 The University of Notre Dame Professor Sims

1. Consider a pure-exchange economy with stochastic endowments. The state of the economy

E β t log (C t ) + M t M t 1. = Y t + B t 1 P t. B t 0 (3) v t = P tc t M t Question 1. Find the FOC s for an optimum in the agent s problem.

Macroeconomics I, UPF Professor Antonio Ciccone SOLUTIONS PROBLEM SET 1

Intermediate Macro In-Class Problems

Lecture Notes 5: Investment

Essential Microeconomics : OPTIMAL CONTROL 1. Consider the following class of optimization problems

Explaining Total Factor Productivity. Ulrich Kohli University of Geneva December 2015

Final Exam Advanced Macroeconomics I

1 Answers to Final Exam, ECN 200E, Spring

Problem Set on Differential Equations

( ) (, ) F K L = F, Y K N N N N. 8. Economic growth 8.1. Production function: Capital as production factor

Economics 6130 Cornell University Fall 2016 Macroeconomics, I - Part 2

Final Exam. Tuesday, December hours

Macroeconomics 1. Ali Shourideh. Final Exam

3.1.3 INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION: DISCRETE TIME PROBLEMS. A. The Hamiltonian and First-Order Conditions in a Finite Time Horizon

The Brock-Mirman Stochastic Growth Model

A Dynamic Model of Economic Fluctuations

T L. t=1. Proof of Lemma 1. Using the marginal cost accounting in Equation(4) and standard arguments. t )+Π RB. t )+K 1(Q RB

A Note on Public Debt, Tax-Exempt Bonds, and Ponzi Games

Lecture 3: Solow Model II Handout

Seminar 4: Hotelling 2

Solutions to Assignment 1

COMPETITIVE GROWTH MODEL

Full file at

Simulating models with heterogeneous agents

This document was generated at 1:04 PM, 09/10/13 Copyright 2013 Richard T. Woodward. 4. End points and transversality conditions AGEC

Economic Growth & Development: Part 4 Vertical Innovation Models. By Kiminori Matsuyama. Updated on , 11:01:54 AM

= ( ) ) or a system of differential equations with continuous parametrization (T = R

Hamilton- J acobi Equation: Weak S olution We continue the study of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation:

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

Seminar 5 Sustainability

A Note on Raising the Mandatory Retirement Age and. Its Effect on Long-run Income and Pay As You Go (PAYG) Pensions

Online Appendix to Solution Methods for Models with Rare Disasters

( ) a system of differential equations with continuous parametrization ( T = R + These look like, respectively:

Appendix 14.1 The optimal control problem and its solution using

This document was generated at 7:34 PM, 07/27/09 Copyright 2009 Richard T. Woodward

EXERCISES FOR SECTION 1.5

Lecture 19. RBC and Sunspot Equilibria

Simulation-Solving Dynamic Models ABE 5646 Week 2, Spring 2010

Examples of Dynamic Programming Problems

Introduction D P. r = constant discount rate, g = Gordon Model (1962): constant dividend growth rate.

Problem Set #1 - Answers

A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering. Class 19 on Unit 18

dt = C exp (3 ln t 4 ). t 4 W = C exp ( ln(4 t) 3) = C(4 t) 3.

Math 116 Second Midterm March 21, 2016

Licenciatura de ADE y Licenciatura conjunta Derecho y ADE. Hoja de ejercicios 2 PARTE A

Macroeconomics Qualifying Examination

Math 333 Problem Set #2 Solution 14 February 2003

Graduate Macro Theory II: Notes on Neoclassical Growth Model

Lars Nesheim. 17 January Last lecture solved the consumer choice problem.

Problem set 3: Endogenous Innovation - Solutions

Exam 1 Solutions. 1 Question 1. February 10, Part (A) 1.2 Part (B) To find equilibrium solutions, set P (t) = C = dp

F This leads to an unstable mode which is not observable at the output thus cannot be controlled by feeding back.

Reserves measures have an economic component eg. what could be extracted at current prices?

Cosumnes River College Principles of Macroeconomics Problem Set 1 Due January 30, 2017

The Brock-Mirman Stochastic Growth Model

Course Notes for EE227C (Spring 2018): Convex Optimization and Approximation

Lecture 2-1 Kinematics in One Dimension Displacement, Velocity and Acceleration Everything in the world is moving. Nothing stays still.

IMPLICIT AND INVERSE FUNCTION THEOREMS PAUL SCHRIMPF 1 OCTOBER 25, 2013

A User s Guide to Solving Real Business Cycle Models. by a single representative agent. It is assumed that both output and factor markets are

Note: For all questions, answer (E) NOTA means none of the above answers is correct.

Chapter 8 The Complete Response of RL and RC Circuits

d 1 = c 1 b 2 - b 1 c 2 d 2 = c 1 b 3 - b 1 c 3

5.1 - Logarithms and Their Properties

3.6 Derivatives as Rates of Change

KINEMATICS IN ONE DIMENSION

Expert Advice for Amateurs

ADVANCED MATHEMATICS FOR ECONOMICS /2013 Sheet 3: Di erential equations

grows at a constant rate. Besides these classical facts, there also other empirical regularities which growth theory must account for.

4.1 - Logarithms and Their Properties

Two Coupled Oscillators / Normal Modes

Online Convex Optimization Example And Follow-The-Leader

Unemployment and Mismatch in the UK

Announcements: Warm-up Exercise:

pe pt dt = e pt Probabilty of death given survival till t : pe pt = p Expected life at t : pe(s t)p ds = e (s t)p t =

Math 36. Rumbos Spring Solutions to Assignment #6. 1. Suppose the growth of a population is governed by the differential equation.

Inventory Analysis and Management. Multi-Period Stochastic Models: Optimality of (s, S) Policy for K-Convex Objective Functions

Some Basic Information about M-S-D Systems

Decomposing Value Added Growth Over Sectors into Explanatory Factors

Appendix to The Macroeconomics of Trend Inflation Journal of Economic Literature, September 2014

Oscillation of an Euler Cauchy Dynamic Equation S. Huff, G. Olumolode, N. Pennington, and A. Peterson

t + t sin t t cos t sin t. t cos t sin t dt t 2 = exp 2 log t log(t cos t sin t) = Multiplying by this factor and then integrating, we conclude that

(1) (2) Differentiation of (1) and then substitution of (3) leads to. Therefore, we will simply consider the second-order linear system given by (4)

Module 2 F c i k c s la l w a s o s f dif di fusi s o i n

1 Consumption and Risky Assets

Stochastic Modelling in Finance - Solutions to sheet 8

( ) ( ) if t = t. It must satisfy the identity. So, bulkiness of the unit impulse (hyper)function is equal to 1. The defining characteristic is

Fall 2015 Final Examination (200 pts)

Random Walk with Anti-Correlated Steps

Transcription:

Universiy of Warwick EC9A2 Advanced Macroeconomic Analysis Problem Se #3: AK models Jorge F. Chavez December 3, 2012 Problem 1 Consider a compeiive economy, in which he level of echnology, which is exernal o he firm, is A A(k ) k β where k K /L and β (0, 1]. All firms share he same echnology. In paricular, producion of firm j is: Y j, A K α j,l 1 α j, where α (0, 1), K j, and L j, are he quaniies of capial and labor employed by firm j. (a) Find he facor shares, show ha k j, k for all j, and ha aggregae oupu is Y j Y j A K α L 1 α Soluion. Firms solve: FONCs: { max A Kj,L α 1 α } j, R K j, w L j, (K j,,l j, ) R 2 + wr K j, : wr L j, : αa K α 1 j, L 1 α j, αa k α 1 j, R (1 α) A Kj,L α α j, (1 α) A kj, α w Noe ha he fac ha F is sricly concave and homoheic rules ou corner soluions. In a compeiive economy, firms re price akers. Tha is, all firms will face he same R and w. Since firms are no heerogeneous in any dimension, hey all mus choose he same k j, k, j. 1 e-mail:j.chavez-corado@warwick.ac.uk 1 If you would like o be more formal you can prove his resul by conradicion. Suppose i s.h. k i, > k. Diminishing reurns will imply ha his firm will be willing o pay a lower reurn: αa k α 1 i, < R αa k α 1. Therefore his firm will be unable o ren he addiional capial i requires being forced o reduce is demand unil i reaches k. 1

Nex, consan reurns o scale in F imply ha in equilibrium: F (K, L ) F (K )K + F (L )L. Therefore i is sraighforward o check ha: R K Y αa k α 1 j, K A Kj, α α L1 α j, w K (1 α) A kj, α L Y A Kj, α 1 α L1 α j, Finally, noe ha because all firms choose he same capial-labor raio: (i) he aggregae capial oupu raio will also be k : k K j, L j, j K j, j L K j, L (ii) hey mus be producing he same amoun of oupu in per capial erms f (k ) A k α. Therefore: Y j Y j j L j, A k α ( ) α K A L L j, A K α L 1 α j (b) Find he dynamical sysem k +1 ϕ(k ), assuming ha saving per worker is sy, s (0, 1). Calculae lim k 0 ϕ (k ) and lim k ϕ (k ) for β + α < 1, β + α 1 and β + α > 1. Soluion. Recall ha A k β. Then, he law of moion for k +1 is: () k +1 sy + (1 δ) k where y AKα L1 α L k β k α k α+β. Finally: k +1 skα+β + (1 δ) k φ (k ) Nex: φ (k ) s (α + β) kα+β 1 + (1 δ) s (α + β) kα+β 1 + 1 δ (1) When k 0: lim k φ (k ) 0 When k : lim k + φ (k ) + α + β < 1 [s (α + β) + (1 δ)] / () α + β 1 (1 δ) / () α + β > 1 (1 δ) / () α + β < 1 [s (α + β) + (1 δ)] / () α + β 1 + α + β > 1 Jorge F. Chávez 2

(c) Show ha for β 1 α he economy grows a a consan rae in he seady sae 2 if s > δ + n. Wha is he seady sae growh rae if s < δ + n? Soluion. When α + β 1 and s > δ + n, he policy rule (1) becomes: k +1 (s + 1 δ) k This can be rewrien as: k +1 skα+β (n + δ) k Recall ha for a R small log(1 + a) a. This is equivalen o say ha if b 1 R is small enough, hen log(b) b 1. Then aking logs o boh sides of he above equaliy: Therefore: log k +1 log k log γ k (s + 1 δ) ( k+1 1 k ) ( ) (s + 1 δ) log s (n + δ) Therefore, o have growh a a consan rae (which means ha he pah of {k } 0 will be unbounded), we need he slope of φ(k ) o be greaer han 1 as is shown in figure 1b. Finally, when s < δ + n he growh rae γ k < 0 φ (k ) < 0 so ha now he rivial seady sae k 0 sill become sable as shown in figure 1a. (d) Find he economy s seady sae for β < 1 α. Is i unique? Is i sable? How is i affeced by he saving rae? Soluion. When α + β < 1, he seady-sae condiion k +1 0 implies wo consan seady-saes: ( he rivial one 0 and a unique, non-rivial one (i) For uniqueness i suffices o argue ha: φ (k ) s (α + β) (α + β 1) k α+β 2 < 0 ) 1/(1 α β). s n+δ which implies ha φ( ) is sricly concave. This wih he fac ha φ(0) 0 will imply ha he funcion φ(k ) will cu from above he 45 o line in exacly one poin, which guaranees ha he non-rivial seady sae is unique. 2 Define seady-sae here. Jorge F. Chávez 3

Figure 1: Long-run growh k +1 (a) If (s+1 δ) 1+n < 1 45 o k +1 (b) If (s+1 δ) 1+n > 1 ϕ 2(k ) 45 o ϕ 1(k ) k 3 k 0 k k 0 k (ii) For sabiliy, we need o check if φ ( ) < 1: φ ( ) s (α + β) kα+β 1 2 + 1 δ s (α + β) s (α + β) [ ( ) ] 1/(1 α β) α+β 1 s + 1 δ n + δ ( n + δ s ) + 1 δ < 1 (α + β) n + (α + β) δ + 1 δ (1 + (α + β) n) δ [1 (α + β)] where he las inequaliy follows from he fac ha α+β < 1 which implies ha δ [1 (α + β)] > 0. Finally, i is easy o show ha s > 0 (e) Find he economy s seady sae for β > 1 α. Is i unique? Is i sable? How is i affeced by he saving rae? How do you inerpre his resul? Soluion. The argumen is analogous o he previous quesion. Now φ( ) is convex and φ (k ) > 1 which imply ha he non-rivial seady sae is also unique bu unsable. Jorge F. Chávez 4

Problem 2 Producion is given by: Y F (K, h ) BK α h 1 α, where h +1 h(e ) ρe, is human capial and e is invesmen in human capial. The saving rae is s (0, 1) (i.e., S sy ), invesmen is efficien, and physical capial fully depreciaes a he end of he period, (δ 1): (a) Find he dynamical sysem governing he evoluion of oupu, Y. Soluion. Before proceeding we need o realize wo hings. Firs, noe ha he sock of human capial for + 1 depends on he invesmen decision e which akes place a ime, and which is going o be a funcion of sy. More precisely he economy s aggregae invesmen I sy mus be used o accumulae boh physical capial and human capial. All his will mean ha, unlike previous models, now aggregae oupu Y will be a sae variable: Y +1 will depend on Y and hus we will need o rack he evoluion of Y +1. Second, he fac ha invesmen is efficien means ha he allocaion decision for sy mus be done in an efficien way (i.e. wih some opimizaion crieria). In his case, he social planner (he one ha decides how much invesmen devoe o accumulae human capial) will choose θ o maximize Y +1 B(θ sy ) α (ρ (1 θ ) sy ) 1 α. Tha is: max {BsY (θ ) α (1 θ ) 1 α ρ 1 α} 0 θ 1 FOCN for inerior soluion: 3 α(θ ) α 1 (1 θ ) 1 α + (1 α) (θ ) α (1 θ ) α ( 1) 0 Solving for θ we ge: 1 θ θ 1 α α which implies ha θ α,. Finally, he law of moion for Y +1 will be given by he value funcion Y +1 (θ ): Y +1 ξ (Y ) α a (1 α) 1 α ρ 1 α sb Y (2) }{{} ψ (b) Wha is he condiion on he parameers ha assures seady sae growh? Soluion. From condiion (2), aking logs and using he fac ha for b 1 R small enough log(b 1) b is sraighforward o show ha we need ψ > 1 3 I is easy o show ha corner soluions will be ruled ou Jorge F. Chávez 5

(c) Suppose ha h(e ) e β, where β (0, 1). find he dynamical sysem governing he evoluion of oupu, Y. Is here growh in he seady sae? Soluion. Apply he same idea as in par (a). The social planner decides he share θ by solving: max {B(sY ) α+β(1 α) (θ ) α (1 θ ) β(1 α)} 0 θ 1 FONC for inerior soluion: Then: α(θ ) α 1 (1 θ ) β(1 α) [ αθ 1 β (1 α) (1 θ ) 1] 0 α β (1 α) θ 1 θ which implies: θ α α + β (1 α) Finally, he law of moion of Y +1 is: ( ) α ( ) β(1 α) Y +1 Bs α+β(1 α) α α 1 α + β (1 α) α + β (1 α) }{{} λ Taking logarihms: Y α+β(1 α) log Y +1 log λ + [α + β (1 α)] log Y (3) where α + β (1 α) < 1. This implies ha he growh rae of {Y +1 } 0 will be decreasing overime, and in fac will end o 0 in he long run. In oher words, he economy will exhibi growh only ransiorily. To see his subrac (3) from is lagged version: log Y +1 log Y [α + β (1 α)] (log Y log Y 1 ) γ Y+1 [α + β (1 α)] γ Y Jorge F. Chávez 6