Output high order sliding mode control of unity-power-factor in three-phase AC/DC Boost Converter

Similar documents
Grid-connected photovoltaic systems based on nonlinear control.

Inductance, Inductors, RL Circuits & RC Circuits, LC, and RLC Circuits

Chapter 33. Alternating Current Circuits

Electromagnetic Oscillations and Alternating Current. 1. Electromagnetic oscillations and LC circuit 2. Alternating Current 3.

TSTE25 Power Electronics. Lecture 3 Tomas Jonsson ICS/ISY

EM Oscillations. David J. Starling Penn State Hazleton PHYS 212

Chapter 4 Transients. Chapter 4 Transients

Handout 10: Inductance. Self-Inductance and inductors

Power Electronics

Lecture 11 - AC Power

Inductance, RL and RLC Circuits

Prof. Anyes Taffard. Physics 120/220. Voltage Divider Capacitor RC circuits

MODULE I. Transient Response:

Figure Circuit for Question 1. Figure Circuit for Question 2

EXP. NO. 3 Power on (resistive inductive & capacitive) load Series connection

EE 230 Lecture 40. Data Converters. Amplitude Quantization. Quantization Noise

Project Components. MC34063 or equivalent. Bread Board. Energy Systems Research Laboratory, FIU

RLC Circuit (3) We can then write the differential equation for charge on the capacitor. The solution of this differential equation is

Chapter 3. Steady-State Equivalent Circuit Modeling, Losses, and Efficiency

Module 25: Outline Resonance & Resonance Driven & LRC Circuits Circuits 2

Single-Phase Synchronverter for DC Microgrid Interface with AC Grid

Lecture 39. PHYC 161 Fall 2016

1 Phasors and Alternating Currents

Handout 11: AC circuit. AC generator

ELECTROMAGNETIC OSCILLATIONS AND ALTERNATING CURRENT

EE 435. Lecture 30. Data Converters. Spectral Performance

Physics for Scientists & Engineers 2

C R. Consider from point of view of energy! Consider the RC and LC series circuits shown:

EN Power Electronics and Machines

Lecture 24. Impedance of AC Circuits.

Active Figure 32.3 (SLIDESHOW MODE ONLY)

Electronic Circuits Summary

Solutions to Problems in Chapter 4

Modeling Buck Converter by Using Fourier Analysis

To find the step response of an RC circuit

EE C245 ME C218 Introduction to MEMS Design

Coupled Electrical Oscillators Physics Advanced Physics Lab - Summer 2018 Don Heiman, Northeastern University, 5/24/2018

Sinusoidal Response of RLC Circuits

Inductance, RL Circuits, LC Circuits, RLC Circuits

Lecture 4: R-L-C Circuits and Resonant Circuits

The output voltage is given by,

Chapter 32. Inductance

ECE 201 Fall 2009 Final Exam

Self-inductance A time-varying current in a circuit produces an induced emf opposing the emf that initially set up the time-varying current.

Repetitive control : Power Electronics. Applications

EE292: Fundamentals of ECE

Prof. Dr. Erol KURT Nonlinear Problems in Piezoelectric Harvesters

Novel DC-AC Converter Topology for Multilevel Battery Energy Storage Systems. Mario Gommeringer, Felix Kammerer, Johannes Kolb, Michael Braun

Power Factor Improvement

R-L-C Circuits and Resonant Circuits

Alternating Current Circuits. Home Work Solutions

Introduction to CMOS RF Integrated Circuits Design

Chapter 21: RLC Circuits. PHY2054: Chapter 21 1

EA2.3 - Electronics 2 1

Converter System Modeling via MATLAB/Simulink

Chapter 32. Inductance

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Physics 8.02 Spring 2003 Experiment 17: RLC Circuit (modified 4/15/2003) OBJECTIVES

ω 0 = 2π/T 0 is called the fundamental angular frequency and ω 2 = 2ω 0 is called the

Research on Permanent Magnet Linear Synchronous Motor Control System Simulation *

Basics of Electric Circuits

Section 4. Nonlinear Circuits

Lecture 23: NorCal 40A Power Amplifier. Thermal Modeling.

Basic RL and RC Circuits R-L TRANSIENTS: STORAGE CYCLE. Engineering Collage Electrical Engineering Dep. Dr. Ibrahim Aljubouri

Circuit Analysis-III. Circuit Analysis-II Lecture # 3 Friday 06 th April, 18

ET4119 Electronic Power Conversion 2011/2012 Solutions 27 January 2012

11. AC Circuit Power Analysis

EE292: Fundamentals of ECE

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

EE 435. Lecture 28. Data Converters Linearity INL/DNL Spectral Performance

Physics 115. AC: RL vs RC circuits Phase relationships RLC circuits. General Physics II. Session 33

GATE EE Topic wise Questions SIGNALS & SYSTEMS

AC Circuits Homework Set

Switched-Capacitor Circuits David Johns and Ken Martin University of Toronto

Control of Wind Turbine Generators. James Cale Guest Lecturer EE 566, Fall Semester 2014 Colorado State University

Solutions to these tests are available online in some places (but not all explanations are good)...

Some of the different forms of a signal, obtained by transformations, are shown in the figure. jwt e z. jwt z e

Homework Assignment 08

Chapter 7 DC-DC Switch-Mode Converters

EECE 2150 Circuits and Signals Final Exam Fall 2016 Dec 16

Interconnection of LTI Systems

EE 40: Introduction to Microelectronic Circuits Spring 2008: Midterm 2

8. Electric Currents

Part II Converter Dynamics and Control

Total No. of Questions :09] [Total No. of Pages : 03

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS MATHEMATICS FOR PART I ENGINEERING. Self-paced Course

Module 24: Outline. Expt. 8: Part 2:Undriven RLC Circuits

Introduction to AC Circuits (Capacitors and Inductors)

Sinusoidal Steady-State Analysis

ECE Spring 2017 Final Exam

Mixing Problems. Solution of concentration c 1 grams/liter flows in at a rate of r 1 liters/minute. Figure 1.7.1: A mixing problem.

AC Circuits III. Physics 2415 Lecture 24. Michael Fowler, UVa

Physics 11b Lecture #15

AC analysis. EE 201 AC analysis 1

Power semiconductor devices

Lecture 4, Noise. Noise and distortion

Basic Electronics. Introductory Lecture Course for. Technology and Instrumentation in Particle Physics Chicago, Illinois June 9-14, 2011

Module 4. Single-phase AC Circuits

EXPERIMENT 07 TO STUDY DC RC CIRCUIT AND TRANSIENT PHENOMENA

Lecture 05 Power in AC circuit

Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis (AC Analysis) Part II

Transcription:

Output high order sliding mode control of unity-power-factor in three-phase AC/DC Boost Converter JianXing Liu, Salah Laghrouche, Maxim Wack Laboratoire Systèmes Et Transports (SET) Laboratoire SeT

Contents of the presentation Introduction Problem Formulation Second order sliding mode controller design Second order sliding mode observer design Simulation results with proposed controller Conclusions

AC-DC power conversion The electric utility grid has a sinusoidal waveform, and most electronic equipment needs a DC power supply. AC-DC power conversion is required by all electronic devices virtually MOSFET, IGBT, are commonly used for AC-DC Converters

AC-DC power conversion Problem:. The performance and efficiency of power converters with unknown varying load and internal uncertainties. Minimize the number of the sensors Power factor reflects the efficiency and quality of such process. Different control algorithms have been used to achieve unity power factor. An output second order sliding mode control is designed here.

Model of three phase AC/DC converter The circuit of three phase AC/DC boost converter i link Fig Three phase boost type AC/DC converter

Model Model in Phase Coordinate Frame: di r U U 0 = i ( u u u 3) + dt L 6L L di r U U 0 = i ( u u u ) + dt L 6L L di U 3 r U i 0 = 3 ( u 3 u u ) + dt L 6L L du U ( ) 0 0 = + ui + ui + ui 33 dt RlC C g g g3

Model in (d,q) Coordinate Frame It is convenient to design the control in the rotating reference frame synchronized with the supply frequency. Transformation Matrix: cos( ) cos( ) cos( ) x x ωt ωt π ωt+ π d 3 3 x x = q 3 sin( ωt) sin( ωt π) sin( ωt π) + x 3 3 3 Define: C cos( ) cos( ) cos( ) ωt ωt π ωt+ π 3 3 = 3 sin( ωt) sin( ωt π) sin( ωt π) + 3 3

Model in (d,q) Coordinate Frame di r U U d 0 = i + ω i u + dt L d q L d L di r U U q = i ω i 0 u + dt L q d L q L du U 3 0 = 0 + ( iu + iu ) dt R C 4C d d q q l Where ω is the source frequency gd gq

Control objectives Unity power factor Ripple free output voltage with desired level i d i * * tracks id, q tracks i q Satisfy Power Balance Equation 3 ( U i + U i ) = U U * * 0 gd d gq q 0REF Rl Considering unity power factor, the desired currents are as follows: * d i = i = 0 U U * 0REF 0 q 3U R gq l

Control structure Observer-based control structure is shown is fig. Fig Observer-based control structure

Super-Twisting sliding mode x= f(,) xt + bxtu (,) y = Design sx ( ) where x, f, b! n Control Objective: Force sx ( ) to zero. The relative degree with respect to Advantages: Robustness property with respect to perturbations and parametric uncertainties. Smoother than the classic sliding mode control sx ( ) is equal to one. u = υ(), s υ() s = λs sign() s + αsign() s dt,( λα, > 0)

Step:Sliding manifolds design Design the switching functions: s = i * i d d d = * q q q s i i To find a domain in the system space from which any state trajectory converges to the sliding manifold(s d =0,s q =0). U * r gd u d d q s i i ωi d L L U u 0 d fd U0 = + C u = + U u * r gq L q fq L s q iq iq ωi + d u 3 L L

Step: Control design Super twisting sliding mode controller can be designed: u - υ(s ) u = - υ(s ) u 3 - υ(s 3) υ( e) = λe sign( e) + αsign( e) dt,( λα, > 0) The transformed vector s should be designed such that, under the above controller, s d and s q will vanish in finite time. s L 3 s T d s = C U0 s q s 3

Super-Twisting Observation Design Assuming that only the output voltage(u 0 ) is measured, a supertwisting sliding observer is constructed as a copy of the original system. di r d U U i i 0 gd = d+ ω q u d + k υ( e 3) dt L L L diq r U U i i 0 gq = u k q ω d q + υ( e 3) dt L L L du0 U0 3 = + ( iu d d + iu q q ) k3υ ( e3 ) dt RlC 4C Where 3 3 3 3 Define observation error: e = id id e = iq iq e = U U 3 0 0 υ( e ) = λe sign( e ) + αsign( e ) dt,( λα, > 0)

Super-Twisting Observation Design The estimation error dynamics are: de r ud = e + ω e e 3 k υ( e 3) dt L L u q de = r e ω e e 3 k υ( e 3) dt L L de3 3 = e3+ ( ue d + ue q ) k3υ ( e3 ) dt RlC 4C The sliding surface defined as s=e 3 =0. Choosing a large positive constant k 3 can assure the convergence of s(e 3 =0) in finite time.

Observer convergence proof Dynamics on the sliding manifold The equivalent switching function is: υ ( e3) = ( ue d + ue q ) kc 3 Substitute into the two equations of error dynamics, r r e ω ~ L e k k ud uq e ω L k k ud uq, A, A, U = = = dq = r e kc 3 k k 0 0 e r k k 0 0 e ω ω L e ψ ( e ) L As A is a Hurwitz matrix, there exists a unique positive definite symmetric matrix P that satisfies the equation with positive definite symmetric matrix Q. T PA + A P = Q The Lyapunov function is given as: V ( e ) = e Pe T

Observer convergence proof The derivative of V(e ) is V V V ( e ) = Ae + ( e ) e ψ e The first term: V Ae T T T = e ( PA + A P ) e = e Qe λmin ( Q ) e e The second term can be expressed as: V T ( e ) ep ( e ) P e ( e ) e ψ ψ ψ ~ η ψ( e ) A U dq e ρ e, ρ = kc kc 3 3 ~ ~ T ~ A λmax( A A) ( k k ) η = = = + If ρ < λmin ( Q) λ ( P) max V( e ) λ ( Q) e + ρλ ( P) e min max,the origin is globally exponentially stable.

Observation of Source Phase Voltage A link current sensor is used to estimate the source phase voltage. if u u = u link if u u = u3 Design the sliding mode observer: i3 if u3 u = u di r U0 i ( u u u 3) M ( e = + υ ), r Ug Mυ( e) dt L 6L L e= e+ L L υ( e) = λ e sign( e) + αsign( e) dt, e = ui link i Ug = Mυ( e) i 3 = i Choose sufficiently large observer gain M, the sliding mode will be enforced in finite time. i

Observation of Load Resistance du0 U0 = + ( ui + ui + ui 33 ) dt RlC C du0 U0 = + ( ui + ui + ui 33 ) + kυ ( e ) dt RC C l υ( e) = λ e sign( e) + αsign( e) dt, e = U U 0 0 Error dynamics: U U e= k e 0 0 ( ) υ( ) RC l RC l Choose sufficiently large observer gain k, sliding mode will be enforced. υ e U = Rl = kcυ ( e) + R U 0 ( ) ( ) kc R Rl l l 0

Power Factor Calculation I I PF = PFh PFd = cos( φ) I main current harmonic PFh harmonic distortion I total current RMS φ phase shift between input current and main voltage T RMS( i( t)) = i( τ) dτ T is the period of i(t) T 0 Remark: Using Fourier analysis, harmonic distortion measurement, trigonometric modules in matlab, the power factor of the system can easily be obtained.

Simulation Results Parameter Value Description R Load Resistance Ω r 0.0 Parasitic phase resistance Ω L e-3 Phase inductor H C 00e-6 Output capacitance F E 50 Amplitude of source voltage V f t=.5s 40 30 t=.0s 75 50 Source voltage frequency Hz U 0ref 650 Desired output DC voltage V; V(0)=V Load resistance and frequency are varied to test controller s ability to handle with varying load and frequency.

Input current in phase with source voltage Figure Input current and source voltage in case of super-twisting SMC Figure Input current and source voltage in case of traditional SMC Traditional SMC results in higher harmonics compared with super-twisting SMC.

Source Voltage Estimation Figure3 Source voltage U g estimation within the windows when i link is equal to i Source voltage can be reconstructed with super-twisting observer without designing a low-pass filter.

Load Resistance Estimation Figure4 Load resistance R estimator performance Figure4 shows the performance of load resistance estimation.

The performance of observer Figure5 Output voltage estimator performance U 0 Figure6 Current estimator performance i q

The performance of observer Figure7 Phase Current estimator performance Figure5-7 show the performance of the observer. i a

The performance of output voltage Figure8 Output voltage performance with super-twisting control Figure9 Output voltage performance with traditional sliding mode control A bit higher than the desired voltage level and more oscillating compared with super-twisting SMC.

Power Factor Figure0 Power factor with super-twisting control Figure Power factor with Traditional SMC Less value and more oscillations compared with supertwisting control. The super-twisting control was able to produce a power factor that was more than 99%, and can withstand the changing conditions.

Conclusions The proposed control method can achieve a power factor close to unity. Power Balance Condition is taken into account to achieve the desired performance of the system. The proposed super-twisting observer demonstrates its robustness to the change in operational conditions. Source Voltage Estimation is achieved with i link via super-twisting method without using low-pass filter.

Thanks! If you have any questions, I would be pleased to answer them!