Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. & L Garde Inc.

Similar documents
Rapid De-Orbit of LEO Space Vehicles Using Towed Rigidizable Inflatable Structure (TRIS) Technology: Concept and Feasibility Assessment

SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES

AEROTHERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF INNOVATIVE HYPERSONIC DEPLOYABLE REENTRY CAPSULES. Raffaele Savino University of Naples Federico II

USA Space Debris Environment, Operations, and Modeling Updates

Boom-Membrane Integrated Deployable Structures for De-orbiting Satellites and Future Applications

USA Space Debris Environment, Operations, and Policy Updates

Pointing Control for Low Altitude Triple Cubesat Space Darts

A Passive De-orbiting Strategy for High Altitude CubeSat Missions using a Deployable Reflective Balloon

End of Life Re-orbiting The Meteosat-5 Experience

Orbital Debris Mitigation

A Drag Device for Controlled Deorbiting of LEO Spacecraft. (aka Deorbit Drag Device = D 3 )

The Terminator Tape : A Cost-Effective De-Orbit Module for End-of-Life Disposal of LEO Satellites

Small Satellite Aerocapture for Increased Mass Delivered to Venus and Beyond

A Regional Microsatellite Constellation with Electric Propulsion In Support of Tuscan Agriculture

A Passive High Altitude Deorbiting Strategy

USA Space Debris Environment and Operational Updates

Space Travel on a Shoestring: CubeSat Beyond LEO

INTER-AGENCY SPACE DEBRIS COORDINATION COMMITTEE (IADC) SPACE DEBRIS ISSUES IN THE GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT AND THE GEOSTATIONARY TRANSFER ORBITS

SOLAR ROCKET PROPULSION Ground and Space Technology Demonstration. Dr. Michael Holmes, AFRL/PRSS

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30.

FORMATION FLYING WITH SHEPHERD SATELLITES NIAC Fellows Meeting Michael LaPointe Ohio Aerospace Institute

How Can Small Satellites be used to Support Orbital Debris Removal Goals Instead of Increasing the Problem?

The Integrated Structural Electrodynamic Propulsion (ISEP) Experiment

ESSE Payload Design. 1.2 Introduction to Space Missions

Learning Lab Seeing the World through Satellites Eyes

IMPACT OF SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS ON THE MISSION DESIGN OF ESA SPACECRAFT

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Toshinori Kuwahara*, Yoshihiro Tomioka, Yuta Tanabe, Masato Fukuyama, Yuji Sakamoto, Kazuya Yoshida, Tohoku University, Japan

SPACE debris is a growing problem in many orbital regimes,

ATTITUDE CONTROL MECHANIZATION TO DE-ORBIT SATELLITES USING SOLAR SAILS

Design of Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem

Lunar Flashlight Project

SCIENCE WITH DIRECTED AERIAL DR. ALEXEY PANKINE GLOBAL AEROSPACE CORPORATION SAILING THE PLANETS

STUDY THE SPACE DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE EARLY STAGES OF THE NANO-SATELLITE DESIGN

SPACE DEBRIS REMOVAL

1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded

SPACE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS AND SPACE DEBRIS ACTIVITIES IN INDIA

How Small Can a Launch Vehicle Be?

LAUNCH SYSTEMS. Col. John Keesee. 5 September 2003

Spacecraft Environment Interaction Engineering

MARS DROP. Matthew A. Eby Mechanical Systems Department. Vehicle Systems Division/ETG The Aerospace Corporation May 25, 2013

Prof. Richard Crowther Chief Engineer, UK Space Agency. Reflections on Orbital Debris Mitigation Measures

An Architecture of Modular Spacecraft with Integrated Structural Electrodynamic Propulsion (ISEP)

Electric Propulsion System using a Helicon Plasma Thruster (2015-b/IEPC-415)

ACTIVITY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON SPACE DEBRIS PROBLEM

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

De-orbiting Small Satellites Using Inflatables

Statistical methods to address the compliance of GTO with the French Space Operations Act

Small Satellite Aerocapture for Increased Mass Delivered to Venus and Beyond

Satellite Components & Systems. Dr. Ugur GUVEN Aerospace Engineer (P.hD) Nuclear Science & Technology Engineer (M.Sc)

Space Debris Reentry Hazards

SAILING THE PLANETS: PLANETARY EXPLORATION FROM GUIDED BALLOONS. 7 th Annual Meeting of the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts

The Characteristics and Consequences of the Break-up of the Fengyun-1C Spacecraft

ENAE 483/788D MIDTERM FALL, 2018 NAME: a 3 = a = 42970] 1. So after one sol, the subspacecraft point would have gone 88773

Debris Mitigation in LEO Orbits: Performance Analysis and Comparison of different Deorbit Systems

BravoSat: Optimizing the Delta-V Capability of a CubeSat Mission. with Novel Plasma Propulsion Technology ISSC 2013

Propellantless deorbiting of space debris by bare electrodynamic tethers

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Space Debris Re-entries and Aviation Safety

Pico-Satellite Orbit Control by Vacuum Arc Thrusters as Enabling Technology for Formations of Small Satellites

Creating Large Space Platforms From Small Satellites

Proton Launch System Mission Planner s Guide APPENDIX F. Proton Launch System Options and Enhancements

LOW-COST LUNAR COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION

Generation X. Attitude Control Systems (ACS) Aprille Ericsson Dave Olney Josephine San. July 27, 2000

LIMITING ORBITAL DEBRIS

Conceptual Design of an Earth Observation Satellite

The time period while the spacecraft is in transit to lunar orbit shall be used to verify the functionality of the spacecraft.

Chapter 1: Introduction

Aerobraking Technology for Earth Orbit Transfers. Paul Gloyer AeroAstro, Inc. 160 Adams Lane Waveland, MS

Gossamer Spacecraft: Membrane and Inflatable Structures Technology for Space Applications

Orbits for Polar Applications Malcolm Macdonald

Responsive Launch of Small Spacecraft Using Reusable In-Space Tether and Air-Launch Technologies

LAUNCHES AND LAUNCH VEHICLES. Dr. Marwah Ahmed

Solar Thermal Propulsion

CONTROLLED DEORBIT OF THE DELTA IV UPPER STAGE FOR THE DMSP-17 MISSION

Low Thrust Mission Trajectories to Near Earth Asteroids

483 Lecture. Space Mission Requirements. February11, Definition Examples Dos/ Don ts Traceability

SURVEY OF THE ELECTRIC SOLAR WIND SAIL: THE FASTEST MAN-MADE DEVICE EVER BUILT

Passive Orbital Debris Removal Using Special Density Materials

SPACE DEBRIS CHASER CONSTELLATION

Introduction of Small Solar Power Sail Demonstrator IKAROS

DEBRIS IMPACT ON LOW EARTH ORBIT SPACE MISSION

A Space Debris Alert System for Aviation. US Patent pending Inventor: T. Sgobba - ESA Independent Safety Office

Separable warhead mathematical model of Supersonic & Hypersonic Re-entry Vehicles

ASTRIUM. Minimum-time problem resolution under constraints for low-thrust stage trajectory computation. Nathalie DELATTRE ASTRIUM Space Transportation

Circular vs. Elliptical Orbits for Persistent Communications

Marlene H. Dortch Secretary, Federal Communications Commission th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C

5.12 The Aerodynamic Assist Trajectories of Vehicles Propelled by Solar Radiation Pressure References...

Exploration Carriers UPC-Orion Launch Opportunities for Lunar Missions. presented to The Joint Annual Meeting of LEAG-ICEUM-SRR

Sustainable activities in space: Space debris problematic in a nutshell

ASPECT Spectral Imager CubeSat Mission to Didymos

Using Differential Aerodynamic Forces for CubeSat Orbit Control Sanny R. Omar

Final Examination 2015

A Low Cost Inflatable CubeSat Drag Brake Utilizing Sublimation

ORBITAL DECAY PREDICTION AND SPACE DEBRIS IMPACT ON NANO-SATELLITES

Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

Focused Solar Ablation: A Nanosat-Based Method for Active Removal of Space Debris

COUPLED OPTIMIZATION OF LAUNCHER AND ALL-ELECTRIC SATELLITE TRAJECTORIES

Orbital Debris Challenges for Space Operations J.-C. Liou, PhD NASA Chief Scientist for Orbital Debris

Electrically Propelled Cargo Spacecraft for Sustained Lunar Supply Operations

Transcription:

Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. & L Garde Inc. Rapid De-Orbit of LEO Space Vehicles Using Towed owed Rigidizable Inflatable nflatable Structure tructure (TRIS) Technology: Concept and Feasibility Assessment Dave Beckett, Bryce Carpenter Dr. Costas Cassapakis August 10, 2004

Ball Aerospace Mission Areas Earth Science & Meteorology NASA and Commercial Missions Intelligence, Surveillance, & Reconnaissance - DOD Space Science & Exploration - NASA

Key Technical Domains Electro-Optical Hardware and Data Exploitation Solutions Laser and Pointing & Tracking Solutions Microwave Payloads and Radio Frequency Technologies Precision, Low-cost, Spacecraft (Small to Medium Size) Advanced Technology Solutions

History of Inflatable Structures Development Ball and L Garde Have a Culture that Encourages Innovation Conceptual Aerobreaking Toroid Decoy Experiment 14 Meter NASA STS- 77 Inflatable Mirror Experiment 10 Meter 2 NASA ISP Solar Sail Turning Innovative Concepts into Highly Successful Scientific/Technology Missions

Motivation Rapid Increase in the Amount of Orbital Debris NASA Safety Standard 1740, Guidelines and Assessment Procedures for Limiting Orbital Debris Disposal methods identified in guideline 6-1: Atmospheric Reentry Option: Limit the lifetime to no longer that 25 years after EOL. The size of debris must be minimized or a controlled de-orbited must be performed in an unpopulated area Small spacecraft will meet the debris size requirement due to their limited mass (less than ~1000 kg) Spacecraft can use only small quantities of high melting point materials (titanium ceramics, and beryllium) Maneuvering to a storage orbit between LEO and GEO Direct retrieval of the spacecraft and remove if from orbit within 10 years after EOL Recent FCC order requiring geostationary spacecraft disposal plan before a license is issued

Effect of Ballistic Coefficient on De-Orbit 100 Predicted Decay Time Span Lifetime (Years) 90 80 70 60 50 40 200 kg/m 2 150 kg/m 2 100 kg/m 2 50 kg/m 2 Nasa Limit Transition Zone Beyond 600-700 km Spacecraft Cannot Rely on Natural Decay to Meet the NASA De-Orbit Requirement 30 20 10 0 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Circular Altitude (km) Orbital Decay vs. Altitude with Respect to the Ballistic Coefficient

Concept of Operations Primary Mission Operations Launch De-Orbit Device Deployment De-Orbit Device Jettison Secondary Payload (Activated at Primary Mission EOL) Low Stowed Volume Until Deployed Can be Activated by On-board System or By Ground Command Capability of Precision Reentry Profile Using the TRIS Device

De-Orbit Space Vehicles Using Towed Rigidizable Inflatable Structures (TRIS) TRIS System: Gas Generator, Rigidizable Structure, Separation System, Storage Box, and Support Electronics Construction Consists of Rigidized Struts and Annular Ring With an Stretched Membrane Inflation Gas Provided by Solid Propellant (Similar to an Air Bag) or By Stored Gas Structure is Rigidized During Deployment (Metallized Polymer or Thermoset Resin) Structure Does Not Rely on Gas Pressure to Maintain Shape After it is Rigidized (Insensitive to Micrometorites)

TRIS System - Comparison Mass TRIS System 23.9 kg * Propellant Based De-Orbit System 46 kg ** 15 kg system hardware, 31 kg propellant 435 kg *** 110 kg system hardware, 325 kg propellant (with 240kg reserved for de-orbit ) Cost TRIS System $105 K * Propellant Based De-Orbit System $.5 to 1.5 M**/*** Volume TRIS System.024 m 3 * Propellant Based De-Orbit System ~.47 m 3 *** * 15 Meter TRIS Device ** Values Calculated for a 300 kg Spacecraft *** Values Calculated for a 1200 kg Spacecraft (includes propellant margin)

TRIS Performance (700 km) Orbital Decay of SV With / Without TRIS Payload Assumptions: 300 kg SV, Ballistic Coefficient of 150 kg/m2

TRIS Performance (1000 km) Orbital Decay of SV With / Without TRIS Payload Assumptions: 300 kg SV, Ballistic Coefficient of 150 kg/m2

STS-77 Experiment Inflation Movie On-Orbit Operation

Risks Extended On-Orbit Storage Requirements Stability of the Spacecraft During Deployment Controlled Inflation Inherent Damping of the Rigidized Structure Spacecraft Attitude Control After Deployment Aerodynamic Stability in Near Vacuum Conditions Hypersonic Wake Generation Gravity Gradient Solar Pressure Stability Dependant Upon Size/Shape of the Device Increased Cost Due to Extended Mission Operations

Summary A TRIS System Must be Optimized for the Mission The TRIS System Provides Another De-orbit Choice for Small and Large Spacecraft at Altitudes Exceeding 650 km Rapid de-orbit of a LEO SV without a propulsion system Meets the NASA 25 year de-orbit requirement for missions between 650 km and 1000 km A rigidized TRIS device maintains shape after inflation without maintaining pressure Capability of precision reentry profile using the TRIS device Release between 120-150 km The impact zone can be selected to be at any location along the ground track of the last orbit Low Mass, Volume and Cost De-Orbit Alternative for Many LEO Missions