PHI Model 06-C60 Sputter Ion Gun

Similar documents
A DIVISION OF ULVAC-PHI

A DIVISION OF ULVAC-PHI. Quantera II. Scanning XPS Microprobe

PHI. Scanning XPS Microprobe

Depth profiling of Organic Films using mixed C60 + and Ar + Ion-Sputtering

PHI 5000 Versaprobe-II Focus X-ray Photo-electron Spectroscopy

Large Area TOF-SIMS Imaging of the Antibacterial Distribution in Frozen-Hydrated Contact Lenses

A DIVISION OF ULVAC-PHI. Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometer with Parallel Imaging MS/MS for Confident Molecular Identification

Surface and Interface Analysis. Investigations of Molecular Depth Profiling with Dual Beam Sputtering. Journal: Surface and Interface Analysis

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Prof. Paul K. Chu

Surface and Interface Characterization of Polymer Films

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

In-situ Ar Plasma Cleaning of Samples Prior to Surface Analysis

1 EX/P4-8. Hydrogen Concentration of Co-deposited Carbon Films Produced in the Vicinity of Local Island Divertor in Large Helical Device

Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy (SIMS)

Auger Electron Spectroscopy

Application of Surface Analysis for Root Cause Failure Analysis

Secondaryionmassspectrometry

Hiden SIMS Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometers. Analysers for surface, elemental and molecular analysis

Reduced Preferential Sputtering of TiO 2 using Massive Argon Clusters

Applications of XPS, AES, and TOF-SIMS

Polymer/drug films as a model system for a drug eluting coronary stent coating layer

Multi-technique photoelectron spectrometer for micro-area spectroscopy and imaging

SURFACE PROCESSING WITH HIGH-ENERGY GAS CLUSTER ION BEAMS

Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)

Auger Electron Spectroscopy Overview

Accelerated Neutral Atom Beam Processing of Ultra-thin Membranes to Enhance EUV Transmittance. February 22, 2015

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. Fall Exam 1

Molecular depth profiling with reactive ions, or why chemistry matters in sputtering.

Interfacial Chemistry and Adhesion Phenomena: How to Analyse and How to Optimise

ToF-SIMS or XPS? Xinqi Chen Keck-II

The Benefit of Wide Energy Range Spectrum Acquisition During Sputter Depth Profile Measurements

Fig 1: Auger Electron Generation (a) Step 1 and (b) Step 2

Accelerated Neutral Atom Beam (ANAB)

ETCHING Chapter 10. Mask. Photoresist

Application of the GD-Profiler 2 to the PV domain

Resolving Questions of Biological Interface Chemistry with TOF-SIMS and FIB-TOF Tomography

Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) Prof. Paul K. Chu

Lecture 6 Plasmas. Chapters 10 &16 Wolf and Tauber. ECE611 / CHE611 Electronic Materials Processing Fall John Labram 1/68

IONTOF. Latest Developments in 2D and 3D TOF-SIMS Analysis. Surface Analysis Innovations and Solutions for Industry 2017 Coventry

Evaluation of the plasmaless gaseous etching process

Nanoscale IR spectroscopy of organic contaminants

DEPOSITION OF THIN TiO 2 FILMS BY DC MAGNETRON SPUTTERING METHOD

Determination of trace elements in ultrapure semiconductor grade sulfuric acid using the Agilent 8900 ICP-QQQ in MS/MS mode

Analysis of Poly(dimethylsiloxane) on Solid Surfaces Using Silver Deposition/TOF-SIMS

Case Study of Electronic Materials Packaging with Poor Metal Adhesion and the Process for Performing Root Cause Failure Analysis

The design of an integrated XPS/Raman spectroscopy instrument for co-incident analysis

Multilayer Wiring Technology with Grinding Planarization of Dielectric Layer and Via Posts

Lecture 11 Surface Characterization of Biomaterials in Vacuum

Chip-Scale Mass Spectrometers for Portable Gas Analyzers Luis Fernando Velásquez-García. A. I. Akinwande, K. Cheung, and L.-Y Chen.

Characteristics of Neutral Beam Generated by a Low Angle Reflection and Its Etch Characteristics by Halogen-Based Gases

Adjustment of electron temperature in ECR microwave plasma

Reduced preferential sputtering of TiO 2 (and Ta 2 O 5 ) thin films through argon cluster ion bombardment.

Supplementary Figure 1 Detailed illustration on the fabrication process of templatestripped

MSN551 LITHOGRAPHY II

Lecture 22 Ion Beam Techniques

Room temperature synthesis of GaN driven by kinetic. energy be-yond the limit of thermodynamics

Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS)

High-Precision Evaluation of Ultra-Shallow Impurity Profiles by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry

Understanding electron energy loss mechanisms in EUV resists using EELS and first-principles calculations

Methods of surface analysis

( 1+ A) 2 cos2 θ Incident Ion Techniques for Surface Composition Analysis Ion Scattering Spectroscopy (ISS)

Thermo Scientific K-Alpha + XPS Spectrometer. Fast, powerful and accessible chemical analysis for surface and thin film characterization

PHI nanotof II TOF-SIMS. 1

Surface Science Spectra

Nova 600 NanoLab Dual beam Focused Ion Beam IITKanpur

Control of Optical Properties by the Stepwise Chemical and Plasma Spray Treatment of Polycarbonate

Low Voltage Field Emission SEM (LV FE-SEM): A Promising Imaging Approach for Graphene Samples

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

MICROCHIP MANUFACTURING by S. Wolf

MICRO AND NANOPROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES

Surface modification of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and oxide coated PET for adhesion improvement

Segregated chemistry and structure on (001) and (100) surfaces of

CHAPTER 6: Etching. Chapter 6 1

Introduction to X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) XPS which makes use of the photoelectric effect, was developed in the mid-1960

Dielectric constant measurement of P3HT, polystyrene, and polyethylene

Surface Analysis. Dr. Lynn Fuller Dr. Fuller s Webpage:

Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS)

TMT4320 Nanomaterials November 10 th, Thin films by physical/chemical methods (From chapter 24 and 25)

CLUSTER SIZE DEPENDENCE OF SPUTTERING YIELD BY CLUSTER ION BEAM IRRADIATION

IV. Surface analysis for chemical state, chemical composition

Electrochemical Deposition of Iron Nanoparticles on PPY and H terminated Si substrates. Karan Sukhija Co-op Term # 1 April 28 th, 2005

Gaetano L Episcopo. Scanning Electron Microscopy Focus Ion Beam and. Pulsed Plasma Deposition

Ion Implant Part 1. Saroj Kumar Patra, TFE4180 Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology. Norwegian University of Science and Technology ( NTNU )

Evaluation of Cleaning Methods for Multilayer Diffraction Gratings

Thin and Ultrathin Plasma Polymer Films and Their Characterization

Imaging Methods: Scanning Force Microscopy (SFM / AFM)

Supplementary Information

X- ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and its application in phase- switching device study

NTEGRA for EC PRESENTATION

Analysis of Cadmium (Cd) in Plastic Using X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Optimizing Graphene Morphology on SiC(0001)

Three-dimensional depth profiling of molecular structures

Keywords: Abstract. Uwe Scheithauer. Unterhaching

Extrel Application Note

Plasma Deposition (Overview) Lecture 1

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

Focused Ion Beam Induced Local Tungsten Deposition

Applications of Micro-Area Analysis Used by JPS-9200 X-ray Photoelectron Spectrometer

Secondary-Ion Mass Spectrometry

Progress of the interaction between e - and molecule in Fudan University

Transcription:

PHI Model 6-C6 Sputter Ion Gun Introduction: Physical Electronics introduced the model 6-C6 C 6 sputter ion gun and its unique capabilities for surface cleaning and depth profiling of soft materials (figure 1) to the XPS community in 4. 1 Since that time more than sixty model 6-C6 ion guns have been installed in laboratories around the world and C 6 cluster source depth profiling of soft materials has become an established and exciting new capability for XPS practitioners. 1,2,3 + 1 nm Concentration (atom %) 1 8 6 4 N 1s x1 Si 2p 1 3 4 5 Sputter Depth (nm) Figure 1. 1 kv C 6+ sputter depth profile of 3 nm Irganox 3114 layers in an Irganox 311 film. 15 kv C 6+ 29 ps after impact Figure 2. Ion impact simulations show that a C 6 ion very efficiently removes material in the surface region, does not penetrate into the material, and exposes a relatively undamaged subsurface layer for analysis. 4 The 6-C6 produces a 1 kv mass filtered C 6 ion beam. Upon impact with the sample, the large C 6 cluster releases its energy in the near surface region providing a highly efficient sputtering process that exposes a subsurface layer that has sustained minimal chemical damage. 4 In contrast, monatomic ion sources such as Ga + and Ar + sputter inefficiently and individual ions can penetrate below the surface causing chemical damage in and beyond newly exposed subsurface layers. Shown in figures 2 and 3 are pictorial models of the sputtering processes for C 6+ and Ga + impacting a surface at normal incidence. 4 15 kv Ga + 29 ps after impact Figure 3. Ion impact simulations show that a monatomic ion such as Ga + or Ar + is not very efficient at removing material, penetrates into the material, and is likely to create chemical damage in the subsurface region exposed for analysis. 4 1

Why C 6? The growing importance of organic and polymer films for the construction of advanced materials and devices has created a need for the ability to characterize these thin film structures. It is well known that monatomic Ar + sputtering, even with a low accelerating voltage, causes major chemical damage to organic and polymer surfaces, limiting its usefulness for XPS thin film analysis of organic and polymer materials. Cluster ion sources however, have been shown to be useful for the characterization of these films by XPS depth profiling. C 6 7 amu Buckminster Fullerene The composition, mass, and shape of the cluster ion appears to be of critical importance to the ability to depth profile polymers and organics and obtain meaningful chemical information. As shown in figures 2 and 3, a large cluster ion such as C 6+ has a shallow penetration depth compared to a single atom ion source. Because of its large spherical shape C 6 ions cannot penetrate a significant distance into the material it impacts. As a result, on impact the C 6 ion is believed to collapse and impart its momentum to atoms in the surface region resulting in high sputtering efficiency. The results of the C 6 sputtering process are a shallow penetration depth, efficient sputtering, and the creation of a very thin damage layer. It has been shown that an instrument configuration that delivers the C 6 ions at a shallow angle relative to the sample surface optimizes the desirable characteristics of C 6 sputtering for chemical depth profiling. 5 C 24 H 12 3 amu Coronene Ar 4 amu Figure 4. Common ions used today for XPS sputter depth profiling. Coronene is a disk shaped cluster with half the mass of C 6. In contrast to C 6 which is chemically inert in most polymers, coronene contains a significant amount of H that when ionized may chemically interact with some polymers. Coronene has been successfully applied to polymers with O and F linkages. However, just as it is easy to understand why monatomic Ar + is of almost no value for sputtering organics and polymers, it is reasonable to assume that there may be materials that will not work with coronene but will work with C 6 because of the difference in the composition, mass, and shape of the cluster ion. Figure 5. PHI model 6-C6 Ion Gun. From a practical view point it has been demonstrated by PHI that C 6 ion sources can be manufactured at a reasonable cost and maintained to provide stable etch rates and long source lifetimes. Today more than sixty PHI model 6-C6 ion guns have been installed around the world. 2

C 6+ vs. Ar + : Ar + sputtering has a been successfully applied to the study of inorganic materials and thin films for many years. However, for most organics and polymers monatomic Ar + sputtering is known to cause severe chemical damage. Even low voltage ( 25 V) Ar + sputtering has very limited success for organics and polymers. In sharp contrast to Ar +, C 6+ sputtering has been shown to preserve chemistry and composition when depth profiling a number of commonly used organics and polymers that contain O and F linkages (PET, PMMA, PTFE, etc). 6 To illustrate the difference between C 6+ and Ar + sputtering for organics and polymers, sputter depth profiles were obtained from a 1 nm thick film of PMMA on a Si substrate and are shown in figures 6 and 7 on this page. This work was performed at room temperature. The most visible difference between C 6+ and Ar + sputtering of this PMMA sample is that the chemistry and composition is preserved throughout the PMMA film when sputtering with 1 kv C 6+ and that with 25 V Ar + sputtering there is an immediate loss of O indicating severe chemical damage is taking place with 25 V Ar + sputtering. Another observation from this is how efficiently C 6 sputters polymers such as PMMA as shown in figure 8. In this case, the etch rate for PMMA with 1 kv C 6+ was X faster than the.4 nm/min etch rate for SiO 2 using these conditions. The etch rate for PMMA using 25 V Ar + was only 1.6X faster than the.3 nm/min etch rate for SiO 2 using these conditions. Ar + 1.6X Faster 1 nm PMMA Film on Si Wafer 1 8 6 4 4 8 12 16 Sputter Time (min) 1 8 6 4 Expected Composition 1 kv C 6 25 V Argon Expected Composition Si 2p Figure 6. 1 kv C 6+ depth profile of a 1 nm thick PMMA film on a Si wafer substrate showing the preservation of chemical composition as a function of depth with C 6 sputtering. Si 2p C 6+ X Faster Sputtering Efficiency for PMMA vs SiO 2 Figure 8. C 6 sputter etch rates are high for many commonly used industrial polymers. 5 1 15 Sputter Time (min) Figure 7. 25 V Ar + depth profile of a 1 nm thick PMMA film on a Si wafer substrate showing immediate and severe chemical damage even with a very low energy Ar ion beam. 3

1 nm PMMA Film 1 kv C 6+ Depth Profile 1 nm PMMA Film 25 V Ar + Depth Profile x 1 4 8 6 Silicone surface contamination Stable composition within the film 6 x 14 4 Rapid loss of C/O chemistry 4 2 2 - Surface - - Surface - cycle 5 1 cycle 285 28 295 29 PMMA 1 285 29 295 28 8 6 4 x 1 4 Stable composition within the film Si oxide at interface 2 1 x 1 4 Rapid loss of C/O chemistry Si oxide at interface 2 - Surface - - Surface - cycle 5 cycle 1 53 54 1 54 525 53 535 Figure 9. Montage plots of the individual spectra from the 1 kv C 6+ depth profile show the ability to provide meaningful chemical information throughout the profile. Figure 1. Montage plots of the individual spectra from the 25 V Ar + depth profile show rapid and significant chemical damage that limits the usefulness of the profile Figures 9 and 1 are montage plots of the individual spectra from the C 6+ and Ar + depth profiles. In figure 9 the spectra from the 1 kv C 6+ profile show stable composition with depth and the ability to observe different chemistries at the surface and interface with the Si substrate. In contrast, the spectra from the 25 V Ar + profile in figure 1 show evidence of immediate and increasing chemical damage as a function of depth. It is for this reason that Ar + sputter depth profiling has historically not been applied to polymers and organics and that C 6 cluster ion sources have been developed. Since C 6 provides the ability to depth profile through many organic or polymer films and provide the expected compositional information, it becomes possible to depth profile multilayer systems and identify the different layers. C 6 profiling can also be used to study effects such as migration of additives and surface modification of organic and polymer films. 4

Polystyrene 1 kv C 6+ Depth Profile Polystyrene 25 V Ar + Depth Profile 1 8 6 4 (285 ev) (π-π*) 1 8 6 4 (285 ev) (π-π*) Rapid Loss of π π* Depth (nm for SiO 2 ) Polystyrene Depth (nm for SiO 2 ) 4 3 1 π π* 295 29 285 cycle 3 1 surface 28 4 3 1 Rapid Loss of π π* 295 29 285 28 cycle 3 1 surface Figure 11. 1 kv C 6+ depth profile into polystyrene and a montage plot of the spectra showing preservation of chemistry as indicated by the presence of the π π peak as a function of depth. Figure 12. 25 V Ar + depth profile into polystyrene and a montage plot of the spectra show rapid chemical damage as indicated by the loss of the π π peak. Materials that contain aromatic structures or a high degree of cross linking can be challenging even for C 6. Results from these types of samples will be material dependent, but there are some basic observations that can be made. The sputtering efficiency will be reduced and the maximum depth that can be sputtered without chemical damage may be limited. Even though C 6 may sputter these types of materials less efficiently, C 6+ will typically do a better job of preserving chemistry than Ar +. With Ar +, one can expect rapid chemical damage that will be observed by the loss of peaks associated with C- O and N-O linkages. The in figures 11 and 12 show depth profiles and montage plots of the spectra obtained using 1 kv C 6+ and 25 V Ar + to sputter into a polystyrene sheet to a depth of nm (SiO 2 etch rate). This work was performed at room temperature. The C 6 shows the π π* peak remains throughout the profile. In contrast the low voltage argon profile shows an immediate and rapid loss of the π π* peak indicating rapid damage to the aromatic structure of the polystyrene. 5

PET - 1 kv C 6 + With Zalar Rotation 1 PET - 1 kv C 6 + Without Zalar Rotation 1 8 6 4 8 6 4 4 6 Sputter Time (min) PET 4 6 Sputter Time (min) Notice C growth 25 15 1 5 3 295 29 285 cycle 8 surface 28 Figure 13. 1 kv C 6+ sputter depth profile into a thick PET film with the use of Zalar rotation. For the conditions used approximately 1 nm would have been removed based on the etch rate for SiO 2. AFM measurements indicated 24 nm of PET was removed. 6 4 25 15 1 5 295 29 285 28 cycle surface Figure 14. 1 kv C 6+ sputter depth profile into a thick PET film without the use of Zalar rotation. The same sputtering conditions were used for the depth profiles shown in figures 13 and 14. Note the sudden change in surface composition beginning at T=3 min in this non-zalar depth profile. 4 3 1 Zalar Rotation: It has been observed with XPS and TOF-SIMS C 6 sputter depth profiling that there is a limit to how deep one can sputter without seeing a change in chemistry. 7 It has also been observed that Zalar (azimuthal) rotation can be used to extend the sputter depth where chemical composition is preserved. To illustrate this phenomena a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) sheet was sputtered with a 1 kv C 6 ion beam to an estimated depth of 24 nm into the PET (1 nm for SiO 2 ). This work was performed at room temperature. 6

PET - 1 kv C 6 + With Zalar Rotation PET - 1 kv C 6 + Without Zalar Rotation 1 nm nm Figure 15. AFM image of the sputter crater bottom from the sample where Zalar rotation was used, showing a surface roughness of 1 nm. Figure 16. AFM image of the sputter crater bottom from the sample where Zalar rotation was not used, showing a surface roughness of nm. Data from the depth profile collected with Zalar rotation is shown in figure 13. The sputter depth profile shows stable composition for the first minutes followed by a slow increase in the peak intensity. The montage plot of the individual spectra shows characteristic PET spectra throughout the depth profile. Data from the depth profile collected without Zalar rotation is shown in Figure 14. The sputter depth profile shows stable composition for the first 1 15 minutes followed by a transition to a carbon rich state. The montage plot of the individual spectra shows characteristic PET spectra during the period of stable composition at the beginning of the depth profile. During the transition period to the carbon rich state, the spectrum changes. The PET component of the spectrum is diminished and the C-C peak grows in intensity. The AFM image obtained from the sample where Zalar rotation was used shows a surface roughness of 1 nm (figure 15). In contrast, the sample depth profiled without Zalar rotation has a surface roughness of approximately nm (figure 16). The conclusion we have drawn from the shown in figures 13-16 is that as surface roughness increases, portions of the sample are shadowed from the ion beam and carbon from the C 6 ion beam accumulates in these areas. However when Zalar rotation is used, the sputtered surface remains smoother as shown in figure 15. The smooth surface is sputtered more effectively and the expected composition is maintained to a greater depth. To explore what role surface roughening has in this situation, AFM images were collected from the bottom of the sputter craters and are shown in figures 15 and 16. 7

Applications: The study of basic materials is of general interest to understand the capabilities and limitations of C 6 sputtering. However, it is the demonstrated practical application of C 6 depth profiling that has led to the installation of sixty 6-C6 ion guns in laboratories around the world. Polymer Additive Migration: The shown in figures 17 and 18 is from a processed polyurethane part that contains a wax additive. It was suspected that the wax additive was migrating to the surface of the part, but it was not possible to prove it using an Ar + sputter depth profile. However, a 1 kv C 6+ depth profile showed the presence of a thin (15 nm) surface layer that was depleted in O and N (components of polyurethane). The spectra from the depth profile show a different peak shape (fingerprint) in the surface layer than is observed below the surface. The peak shape in the surface layer is consistent with the wax additive and the peak shape below the surface is consistent with polyurethane. Using the Linear Least Squares fitting routine in the PHI MultiPak reduction software, these two peak shapes were selected as basis spectra and used to create the chemical depth profile shown in figure 17. 1 8 6 4 Polymer Additive Migration (wax) (polyurethane) N 1s 4 6 Sputter Depth (nm) Figure 17. 1 kv C 6+ depth profile of a polyurethane part showing migration of a wax additive to the surface. Several observations about the practical use of C 6 depth profiling can be made from this example: First, it was possible to obtain chemical state information from the surface layer and remove it. Second, after removing the surface layer, the polymer material below it was exposed with its chemistry intact and it was possible to continue sputtering into the polymer with no loss of chemical state information. As a result, it was possible to determine the relative thickness of the surface layer and observe the distribution of the additive as a function of depth based upon its XPS chemical fingerprint. Polyurethane surface 4 6 8 296 292 288 284 28 Figure 18. Montage plot of the spectra from the polyurethane profile shows the spectral shape for a wax near the surface and polyurethane below the surface. 8

Drug Distribution in a Biomedical Coating: The shown in figures 19 and is from a biomedical coating that is a 5/5 mixture of rapamycin and PLGA. The drug (rapamycin) is in a PLGA time release coating. The 1 kv C 6+ depth profile shows that the rapamycin is segregated to the surface of the film. Below the surface film is a rapamycin depleted zone and finally the expected composition for the 5/5 mixture. The ability to see the location and distribution of the drug in the coating is very useful information for evaluating the coating process and determining how the coating will perform. The depth profile also shows the presence of Si at the surface. The spectra in figure show the surface to be depleted in PLGA (rich in rapamycin) followed by a PLGA rich zone and finally the expected mixture of PLGA and rapamycin. 1 8 6 4 Si 2p Drug Distribution in a Biomedical Coating Expected Composition for Rapamycin N 1s X 1 1 3 4 5 ~ Sputter Depth (nm) Figure 19. 1 kv C 6+ depth profile of a 5/5 rapamycin and PLGA film showing segregation of the rapamycin to the surface of the coating. PLGA rich zone PLGA depleted Rapamycin Depth 4 nm nm HO O CH 3 O C CH O C CH 2 x PLGA O H y 295 29 285 28 nm Figure. Montage plot of the spectra from the depth profile shows a rapamycin rich surface followed by a rapamycin depleted layer and finally the expected composition for the 5/5 mixture. 9

Organic OLED Films: The shown in figures 21 and 22 is from a model hole transfer layer for OLED display applications. The layer is a mixture of PEDOT and PSS. The 1 kv C + 6 depth profile suggests that near the interface with the ITO the film becomes rich in PEDOT. The S 2p spectra shown in the montage plot in figure 22 show the presence of two chemical states for S. The higher binding energy peak is from the sulfone groups in the PSS and the lower binding energy peak is from the organic S in the PEDOT. From this we can see that there is a mixture of the two components throughout the film and that the PEDOT is present at lower concentrations near the surface and higher concentrations near the bottom of the film. Previously presented work shows that the sulfone chemistry is damaged by Ar + sputtering making it difficult to correctly detect the distribution of PEDOT and PSS within the film if Ar + sputtering is used. 1 8 6 4 Organic OLED Films S 2p In 3d5 Sn 3d5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sputter Time (min) Figure 21. 1 kv C 6+ depth profile of a hole transfer layer for an Organic LED (OLED) device. S 2p Poly(styrenesulfonate) PSS PSS PEDOT Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) PEDOT 174 Surface 17 166 162 158 Figure 22. Montage plot of the S 2p spectra from the depth profile showing preservation of the fragile sulfone chemistry associated with the PSS component of the layer. 1

PHI 6-C6: The PHI model 6-C6 ion gun is uniquely designed for sputter cleaning and sputter depth profiling of organic and polymer materials. The C 6 ion beam and instrument geometry provide this capability with efficient etch rates and low sample damage rates for many materials. The 6-C6 is an optional accessory for current PHI XPS and TOF-SIMS instruments. Beam Voltage Maximum Beam Current Long Life Mode Minimum Beam Diameter 6-C6 Specifications 1 1 KV na @ 1 kv < 1 mm* Maximum Beam Deflection C 6 Source 1 x 1 mm* Heated Reservoir Ionization Method Electron Impact Working Distance 5 63 mm Figure 23. PHI model 6-C6 sputter ion gun. * at 63 mm working distance Source Reservoir Electron Impact Ionizer Objective Lens Sample -1 kv Differential Pumping Isolation Valve Deflection Plates Extractor Wien Filter Bend & Blanking Plate Figure 24. Schematic diagram of the PHI model 6-C6 sputter ion gun. 11

We gratefully acknowledge: Dr. Chris Szakal of NIST for providing the PMMA thin film samples Dr. Anna Belu of the Medtronic Corporation for the rapamycin/plga thin film Dr. Jing-Jong Shyue of Academia Sinica for the organic OLED thin film References: 1. N. Sanada, A. Yamamoto, R, Oiwa, Y. Ohashi, Surface and Interface Analysis, 36 (3), (4) 28-282. 2. K. Tanaka, N. Sanada, M. Hikita, T. Nakamura, T. Kajiyama, A. Takahara, Applied Surface Science, 254, (8) 5435-5438. 3. Y. Chen, B. Yu, W. Wang, M. Hsu, W. Lin, Y. Lin, J. Jou, J. Shyue, Analytical Chemistry, 8, (8) 51-55. 4. Z. Postawa, B. Czerwinski, M. Szewczyk, E. J. Smiley, N. Winograd and B. J. Garrison, Analytical Chemistry, 75, (3) 442-447. 5. T. Miyama, N. Sanada, S. Ida, J. Hammond, M. Suzuki, Applied Surface Science, 255 (8) 951-953. 6. T. Nobuta & T. Ogawa, Journal of Materials Science, 44, (9) 18-1812. 7. G. Fisher, M. Dickinson, S. Bryan, J. Moulder, Applied Surface Science, 255 (8) 819-823. Physical Electronics USA, 18725 Lake Drive East, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone: 952-828-6, Website: www.phi.com ULVAC-PHI, 37 Enzo, Chigasaki City, Kanagawa 253-8522, Japan Telephone 81-467-85-42, Website: www.ulvac-phi.co.jp 11 Physical Electronics USA, Inc. 12