k-tuple Total Domination in Supergeneralized Petersen Graphs

Similar documents
Research Article k-tuple Total Domination in Complementary Prisms

k-tuple Domatic In Graphs

Graphs with few total dominating sets

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 20 Oct 2018

THE RAINBOW DOMINATION NUMBER OF A DIGRAPH

INDEPENDENT TRANSVERSAL DOMINATION IN GRAPHS

EXACT DOUBLE DOMINATION IN GRAPHS

ALL GRAPHS WITH PAIRED-DOMINATION NUMBER TWO LESS THAN THEIR ORDER. Włodzimierz Ulatowski

ON DOMINATING THE CARTESIAN PRODUCT OF A GRAPH AND K 2. Bert L. Hartnell

On Dominator Colorings in Graphs

Applied Mathematics Letters

STRUCTURE OF THE SET OF ALL MINIMAL TOTAL DOMINATING FUNCTIONS OF SOME CLASSES OF GRAPHS

Dominating a family of graphs with small connected subgraphs

AALBORG UNIVERSITY. Total domination in partitioned graphs. Allan Frendrup, Preben Dahl Vestergaard and Anders Yeo

Relations between edge removing and edge subdivision concerning domination number of a graph

ON INTEGER DOMINATION IN GRAPHS AND VIZING-LIKE PROBLEMS. Boštjan Brešar, 1 Michael A. Henning 2 and Sandi Klavžar 3 1.

A Note on Disjoint Dominating Sets in Graphs

Another Look at p-liar s Domination in Graphs

GLOBAL MINUS DOMINATION IN GRAPHS. Communicated by Manouchehr Zaker. 1. Introduction

Complementary Signed Dominating Functions in Graphs

Locating-Total Dominating Sets in Twin-Free Graphs: a Conjecture

Rainbow domination in the lexicographic product of graphs

Fundamental Dominations in Graphs

Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society

A NOTE ON THE DOMINATION NUMBER OF THE CARTESIAN PRODUCTS OF PATHS AND CYCLES. 1. Introduction

A Characterization of the Cactus Graphs with Equal Domination and Connected Domination Numbers

Inverse Closed Domination in Graphs

On Domination Critical Graphs with Cutvertices having Connected Domination Number 3

On minimum cutsets in independent domination vertex-critical graphs

Domination in Cayley Digraphs of Right and Left Groups

The domination game played on unions of graphs

Lower bounds on the minus domination and k-subdomination numbers

The Study of Secure-dominating Set of Graph Products

On Pairs of Disjoint Dominating Sets in a Graph

2-bondage in graphs. Marcin Krzywkowski*

A note on the total domination number of a tree

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 6 Jan 2017

Lights Out!: A Survey of Parity Domination in Grid Graphs

Secure Connected Domination in a Graph

1.3 Vertex Degrees. Vertex Degree for Undirected Graphs: Let G be an undirected. Vertex Degree for Digraphs: Let D be a digraph and y V (D).

Roman domination perfect graphs

Properties of independent Roman domination in graphs

Technische Universität Ilmenau Institut für Mathematik

Introduction to Domination Polynomial of a Graph

Nordhaus Gaddum Bounds for Independent Domination

Group connectivity of certain graphs

Double Total Domination on Generalized Petersen Graphs 1

Rainbow domination in the Cartesian product of directed paths

A Sharp Upper Bound on Algebraic Connectivity Using Domination Number

Restrained Independent 2-Domination in the Join and Corona of Graphs

Locating-Dominating Sets in Graphs

A Solution to the Checkerboard Problem

DECOMPOSITIONS OF MULTIGRAPHS INTO PARTS WITH THE SAME SIZE

ON DOMINATION IN CUBIC GRAPHS

p-liar s Domination in a Graph

Lower Bounds for the Exponential Domination Number of C m C n

3-Chromatic Cubic Graphs with Complementary Connected Domination Number Three

Minimal dominating sets in maximum domatic partitions

Some New Approaches for Computation of Domination Polynomial of Specific Graphs

Transactions on Combinatorics ISSN (print): , ISSN (on-line): Vol. 4 No. 2 (2015), pp c 2015 University of Isfahan

1-factor and cycle covers of cubic graphs

A Bound on Weak Domination Number Using Strong (Weak) Degree Concepts in Graphs

Double domination in signed graphs

Distance in Graphs - Taking the Long View

Maximum graphs with a unique minimum dominatingset

New bounds on the signed domination numbers of graphs

Locating-Domination in Complementary Prisms.

On k-rainbow independent domination in graphs

THE RAINBOW DOMINATION NUMBER OF A DIGRAPH

A characterization of diameter-2-critical graphs with no antihole of length four

NORDHAUS-GADDUM RESULTS FOR WEAKLY CONVEX DOMINATION NUMBER OF A GRAPH

Characterization of total restrained domination edge critical unicyclic graphs

Dominator Colorings and Safe Clique Partitions

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Some constructions of integral graphs

Primitive Matrices with Combinatorial Properties

GENERALIZED INDEPENDENCE IN GRAPHS HAVING CUT-VERTICES

On graphs having a unique minimum independent dominating set

K-DOMINATION ON HEXAGONAL CACTUS CHAINS

Inverse and Disjoint Restrained Domination in Graphs

On Disjoint Restrained Domination in Graphs 1

SEMI-STRONG SPLIT DOMINATION IN GRAPHS. Communicated by Mehdi Alaeiyan. 1. Introduction

Double domination edge removal critical graphs

Vertices contained in all or in no minimum k-dominating sets of a tree

Linear Algebra and its Applications

(This is a sample cover image for this issue. The actual cover is not yet available at this time.)

On the Local Colorings of Graphs

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 28 Oct 2016

DOMINATION IN DEGREE SPLITTING GRAPHS S , S t. is a set of vertices having at least two vertices and having the same degree and T = V S i

On k-total Dominating Graphs

Every 3-connected, essentially 11-connected line graph is Hamiltonian

Independence in Function Graphs

Packing chromatic number, (1, 1, 2, 2)-colorings, and characterizing the Petersen graph

Double Total Domination in Circulant Graphs 1

The path of order 5 is called the W-graph. Let (X, Y ) be a bipartition of the W-graph with X = 3. Vertices in X are called big vertices, and vertices

SOME RESULTS ON THE DISTANCE r-b-coloring IN GRAPHS

ON A TWO-DIMENSIONAL SEARCH PROBLEM. Emil Kolev, Ivan Landgev

Domination and Total Domination Contraction Numbers of Graphs

Roman dominating influence parameters

Minimal Spanning Tree From a Minimum Dominating Set

Transcription:

Communications in Mathematics and Applications Volume (011), Number 1, pp. 9 38 RGN Publications http://www.rgnpublications.com k-tuple Total Domination in Supergeneralized Petersen Graphs Adel P. Kazemi and Behnaz Pahlavsay Abstract. Total domination number of a graph without isolated vertex is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set, that is, a set of vertices such that every vertex of the graph is adjacent to at least one vertex of the set. Henning and Kazemi in[] extended this definition as follows: for any positive integer k, and any graph G with minimum degree-k, a set D of vertices is a k-tuple total dominating set of G if each vertex of G is adjacent to at least k vertices in D. The k-tuple total domination numberγ k,t (G) of G is the minimum cardinality of a k-tuple total dominating set of G. In this paper, we give some upper bounds for the k-tuple total domination number of the supergeneralized Petersen graphs. Also we calculate the exact amount of this number for some of them. 1. Introduction Let G=(V, E) be a graph with vertex set V of order n and edge set E. A cycle on n vertices is denoted by C n. The minimum degree (resp., maximum degree) among the vertices of G is denoted byδ(g) (resp., (G)) or briefly byδ(resp., ). The cartesian product G H of two graphs G and H is a graph with the vertex set V(G H)={(v, w) v V(G), w V(H)}, and two vertices(v, w) and(v, w ) are adjacent together in G H if either w=w and vv E(G) or v=v and ww E(H). In[6], Saražin et al defined the supergeneralized Petersen graph that is an extending of generalized Petersen graph as follows: let m, n 3 be integers and l 0, l 1,..., l m 1 Z n {0}, where Z n ={0,1,,..., n 1}. The vertex set of the graph P(m, n, l 0, l 1,...,l m 1 ) is Z m Z n and the edges are defined by(i, j)(i+1, j), (i, j)(i, j+l i ), for all i Z m and j Z n. The edges of type(i, j)(i+ 1, j) will be called horizontal, while those of type(i, j)(i, j+l i ) vertical. We will call such a graph supergeneralized Petersen graph (SGPG). Note that (P(m, n, l 0, l 1,...,l m 1 )), and P(m, n;1,...,1) is the Cartesian product C m C n of two cycles; in particular, the skeleton of the -dimensional hypercube is Q = C C = P(,;1,1,1,1). 010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 05C69. Key words and phrases. k-tuple total domination number; Supergeneralized Petersen graph; Cartesian product graph.

30 Adel P. Kazemi and Behnaz Pahlavsay To avoid confusion we will pick 0 l i n as a representative of{±l i}. If n is odd, then P=P(m, n; l 0,..., l m 1 ) is obviously -regular, with the exception m=, when the graph is cubic. The same holds when n is even, if l i = n/, for every i Z m. On the contrary, if l i = n/ for some i, then P is not regular, unless l i = n/ for all i Z n. In this last case the graph P is not connected: it is formed by n/ components each isomorphic to C m K. Domination in graphs is now well studied in graph theory and the literature on this subject has been surveyed and detailed in the two books by Haynes, Hedetniemi, and Slater[],[3]. A set S V is a dominating set if each vertex in V\ S is adjacent to at least one vertex of S, and the minimum cardinality of a dominating set is the domination number of G and denoted byγ(g). If in the definition of dominating set we replace V with V\ S, we obtain a total dominating set and similarly the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set is the total domination number of G and denoted byγ t (G). In [], Henning and Kazemi initiated a study of k-tuple total domination in graphs. A subset S of V is a k-tuple total dominating set of G, abbreviated ktds, if every vertex v V has at least k neighbors in S. The k-tuple total domination numberγ k,t (G) is the minimum cardinality of a ktds of G. We remark thatγ t (G)=γ 1,t (G) andγ,t (G) is the same double total domination number. Obviouslyγ k,t (G) γ (k+1),t (G) for all graphs G withδ(g) k+ 1. In this paper, we give some upper bounds for the k-tuple total domination number of the supergeneralized Petersen graphs P(m, n, l 0, l 1,..., l m 1 ), when l 0 = l 1 =...=l m 1, and 1 k. Also we calculate the exact amount of this number for some of them.. Some Bounds We begin with the following trivial observation about the k-tuple total domination number of a graph. The proof follow readily from the definitions and is omitted. Observation.1. Let G be a graph of order n withδ(g) k, and let S be a ktds in G. Then (i) k+1 γ k,t (G) n, (ii) if G is a spanning subgraph of a graph H, thenγ k,t (H) γ k,t (G), (iii) if v is a degree-k vertex in G, then N G (v) S. Observation.1(iii) concludes thatγ k,t (G)= nm, when G=P(m, n; l 0,...,l m 1 ) is -regular and k=. Therefore in continuance, we consider 1 k 3. Now we give a lower bound that we stated it in[5]. Lemma.. If G is a graph of order n withδ(g) k, then γ k,t (G) kn/.

k-tuple Total Domination in Supergeneralized Petersen Graphs 31 Proof. Let G=(V, E). Let S be aγ k,t (G)-set. Each vertex v S is adjacent to at least k vertices in S and therefore to at most d G (v) k vertices outside S. Hence, [S, V\ S] (d G (v) k)= d G (v) k S S ( k). v S Since each vertex in V\ S is adjacent to at least k vertices in S, we note that v S [S, V\ S] k V\ S =k(n S ). Thus, S ( k) k(n S ), whenceγ k,t (G)= S kn/. Remark 1. Let P(m, n; l, l,..., l) be a SGPG. Let n r(mod l). If n 0 (mod l), then P(m, n, l, l,..., l) is formed by l components each isomorphic to P m, nl ;1,1,...,1 with the vertex set{(i, tl+ j) 0 t n,0 i m 1}, l and so m, nl ;1,1,...,1 γ k,t (P(m, n; l, l,..., l))= lγ k,t P Also if n 0(mod l), then G is formed by l components each isomorphic to P(m, n ;1,1,...,1) with the vertex set{(i, tl + j) 0 t n,0 i m 1}, l l when l is the greatest common divisor between n and l, and so m, nl,1,1,...,1 γ k,t (P(m, n; l, l,..., l))= l γ k,t P Therefore for calculating the k-tuple total domination number of P(m, n; l, l,..., l) it suffices to calculate the k-tuple total domination number of P(m, n;1,1,...,1)= C m C n, for every integers m and n. The next three propositions give upper bounds for the k-tuple total domination number of C m C n, where m and n are two arbitrary integers at least. Gravier in[1] gave the upper bound (m+)(n+) for the total domination number of C m C n. Next proposition improves this upper bound. Proposition.3. Let G= C m C n, where m n, and let s and r be non-negative integers such that m s(mod )and n r (mod ). Then m(n+ 1) if (s, r)=(0,3), m(n+ r) if (s, r) {0} {0,1,}, (m s)(n+1) + n 1 if (s, r) {1,} {1}, γ t (G) (m 3)(n+ 1) + 3(n 1) + 1 if (s, r)=(3,1), (m )(n+ 1) + n 1 if (s, r)=(,), (m+ 1)(n+ 1) if (s, r) {3} {,3}...

3 Adel P. Kazemi and Behnaz Pahlavsay Proof. Let S 0 = (i,j),(i+ 3,j),(i+,j+ ),(i+ 1,j+ ) 0 i m s,0 j n r S 1 = (i, n 1),(i+ 3, n 1) 0 i m s S = (i, n ),(i+ 3, n ),(i+ 1, n 1),(i+, n 1) 0 i m s S 3 = (i, n 3),(i+ 3, n 3),(i+ 1, n 1),(i+, n 1) 0 i m s S 1,1 = (m,j+ ),(m 1,j+ 3) 0 j n 1 S,1 = (m,j+ ),(m,j+ ) 0 j n 1 S 3,1 = S, = (m,j),(m,j+ ),(m 3,j+ ) 0 j n 1 } {(m 1, n 1), (m,j),(m 1,j+ 3),(m,j), (m,j+ 3) 0 j n {(m, n )}, S 3, = (m,j),(m 1,j+ ),(m,j+ ),(m 3,j) 0 j n {(m 1, n 1),(m 1, n ),(m 3, n )}, S 3,3 = (m,j),(m 1,j+ ),(m,j+ ),(m 3,j) 0 j n 3 {(m 1, n 1),(m 1, n 3),(m, n 1),(m 3, n 3)}. Since obviously S 0 S r S s,r when 0< r s 3, and S 0 S r when 0 r 3 and s=0, are total dominating sets of G with the wanted cardinality, then our proof will be completed. Proposition.. Let G= C m C n, where m n, and let s and r be non-negative integers such that m s (mod ) and n r (mod ). Then

Proof. Let S 0 = k-tuple Total Domination in Supergeneralized Petersen Graphs 33 mn if (s, r)=(0,0) m(n+ 1) if (s, r) {0} {1,,3}, (m)(n+ 1) + n 1 if (s, r)=(1,1), (m )(n+ 1) 3(n r) γ,t (G) + if (s, r) {} {1,}, (m 3)(n+ 1) + n if (s, r)=(3,1), (m 3)(n+ 1) + 5n 6 if (s, r)=(3,), (m 3)(n+ 1) + 9n 7 if (s, r)=(3,3). (i,j),(i,j+ 3),(i+ 1,j+ 1),(i+ 1,j+ ), (i+,j+ 1),(i+,j+ ),(i+ 3,j), (i+ 3,j+ 3) 0 i m s,0 j n r S 1 ={(i, n) 0 i m s}, S = (i, n ),(i+ 3, n ) 0 i m s {(i, n) 0 i m s}, S 3 = (i, n 3),(i+ 3, n 3),(i+ 1, n ),(i+, n ) 0 i m s {(i, n) 0 i m s}, S 1,1 ={(m, j) 0 j n }, S,1 ={(m, j) 0 j n } (m,j),(m,j+ 3) 0 j n 1 S 3,1 ={(m, j) 0 j n } (i,j),(i,j+ 3) 0 j n 1, i {m 3, m 1}, S, ={(m, j) 0 j n 3} (m,j),(m,j+ 3) 0 j n,

3 Adel P. Kazemi and Behnaz Pahlavsay S 3, = (m 3,j),(m 3,j+ 3) 0 j n {(i, j) m i m 1,0 j n 3} {(m, n ),(m, n 1)}, S 3,3 = (m 3,j),(m 3,j+ 3) 0 j n 3 {(m 3, n 3)} {(m, j) 0 j n 1} {(m 1, j) 0 j n 1} {(m, n ),(m 1, n 1)} (m,j+ 3) 0 j n 3. Since obviously S 0 S r S s,r when 0< r s 3, and S 0 S r when 0 r 3 and s=0, are total dominating sets of G with the wanted cardinality, then our proof will be completed. Proposition.5. Let G= C m C n, where m n, and let s and r be non-negative integers such that m s (mod ) and n r (mod ). Then m(3n+1) if (s, r)=(0,3), m(3n+ r) if (s, r) {0} {0,1,}, (m)(3n+1) + 5(n 1) if (s, r)=(1,1), (m s)(3n+1) γ 3,t (G) + sn s if (s, r) {,3} {1}, (m )(3n+1) + n if (s, r)=(,), (m 3)(3n+1) n+6 + 3n if (s, r)=(3,), (m 3)(3n+1) n+6 + 3n if (s, r)=(3,3), Proof. Let S 0 = (i,j),(i+ 3,j),(i+,j+ ),(i+ 1,j+ ) 0 i m s,0 j n r (i,j+ 1) 0 j n r,0 i m s

k-tuple Total Domination in Supergeneralized Petersen Graphs 35 S 1 ={(i, n 1) 0 i m s}, S ={(i, n 1),(i, n ) 0 i m s 1}, S 3 ={(i, n 1),(i, n ) 0 i m s 1} (i, n 3),(i+ 3, n 3) 0 i m s S 1,1 = (m 1, j) 0 j n } {(m,j+ ) 0 j n 1 S,1 ={(m 1, j),(m, j) 0 j n }, S 3,1 ={(m 1, j),(m, j),(m 3, j) 0 j n }, S, ={(m 1, j),(m, j) 0 j n 1}, S 3, ={(m 1, j),(m, j),(m 3, j) 0 j n 1} (m,j+ 1) 0 j n {(m 3, n ),(m, n )}, S 3,3 ={(m 1, j),(m, j),(m 3, j) 0 j n 1} (m,j+ 1) 0 j n 3 {(m 3, n 3),(m, n 3)}. Since obviously S 0 S r S s,r when 0< r s 3, and S 0 S r when 0 r 3 and s=0, are total dominating sets of G with the wanted cardinality, then our proof will be completed. By the last three propositions and the previous Remark, we can conclude the next three results. Theorem.6. Let G=P(m, n; l, l,... l) be a SGPG, where m n, and let s and r be non-negative integers such that m s (mod ) and n 0 (mod l). Then m(n+ l) if (s, r)=(0,3), m(n+ rl) if (s, r) {0} {0,1,}, (m s)(n+ l) + n l if (s, r) {1,} {1}, γ t (G) (m 3)(n+ l) + l if (s, r)=(3,1), (m )(n+ l) + n l if (s, r)=(,), (m+ 1)(n+ l) if (s, r) {3} {,3}.

36 Adel P. Kazemi and Behnaz Pahlavsay and if n 0 (mod l), such that l is the greatest common divisor between n and l, then m(n+ l ) if (s, r)=(0, 3), m(n+ rl ) if (s, r) {0} {0, 1, }, (m s)(n+ l ) n l + if (s, r) {1, } {1}, γ t (G) (m 3)(n+ l ) + l if (s, r)=(3, 1), (m )(n+ l ) + n l if (s, r)=(, ), (m+1)(n+ l ) if (s, r) {3} {, 3}. Theorem.7. Let G=P(m, n; l, l,... l) be a SGPG, where m n, and let s and r be non-negative integers such that m s (mod ) and n 0 (mod l). Then mn if (s, r)=(0, 0), m(n+ l) if (s, r) {0} {1,, 3}, (m 1)(n+ l) + n l if (s, r)=(1, 1), (m )(n+ l) 3(n rl) γ,t (G) + if (s, r) {} {1, }, (m 3)(n+ l) + n l if (s, r)=(3, 1), (m 3)(n+ l) + 5n 6l if (s, r)=(3, ), (m 3)(n+ l) + 9n 7l if (s, r)=(3, 3). and if n 0 (mod l), such that l is the greatest common divisor between n and l, then mn if (s, r)=(0, 0), m(n+ l ) if (s, r) {0} {1,, 3}, (m 1)(n+ l ) + n l if (s, r)=(1, 1), (m )(n+ l ) γ,t (G) + 3(n rl ) if (s, r) {} {1, }, (m 3)(n+ l ) + n l if (s, r)=(3, 1), (m 3)(n+ l ) + 5n 6l if (s, r)=(3, ), (m 3)(n+ l ) + 9n 7l if (s, r)=(3, 3).

k-tuple Total Domination in Supergeneralized Petersen Graphs 37 Theorem.8. Let G=P(m, n; l, l,... l) be a SGPG, where m n, and let s and r be non-negative integers such that m s (mod ) and n 0 (mod l). Then m(3n+l) if (s, r)=(0,3), m(3n+ rl) if (s, r) {0} {0,1,}, (m 1)(3n+l) + 5n 5l if (s, r)=(1,1), (m s)(3n+l) γ 3,t (G) + sn sl if (s, r) {,3} {1}, (m )(3n+l) + n if (s, r)=(,), (m 3)(3n+l) n+6l + 3n if (s, r)=(3,), (m 3)(3n+l) n+6l + 3n if (s, r)=(3,3). and if n 0 (mod l), such that l is the greatest common divisor between n and l, then m(3n+l ) if (s, r)=(0,3), m(3n+ rl ) if (s, r) {0} {0,1,}, (m 1)(3n+l ) + 5n 5l if (s, r)=(1,1), (m s)(3n+l ) γ 3,t (G) + sn sl if (s, r) {,3} {1}, (m )(3n+l ) + n if (s, r)=(,), (m 3)(3n+l ) n+6l + 3n if (s, r)=(3,), (m 3)(3n+l ) n+6l + 3n if (s, r)=(3,3). 3. Sharp Bounds By Lemma. and the last three theorems and the previous Remark, we can conclude the next two results. Theorem 3.1. Let 1 k. Let G=P(m, n; l, l,... l) be a SGPG, where m n, and let s and r be non-negative integers such that m 0(mod ) and n 0 (mod l). Then γ k,t (G)= kmn.

38 Adel P. Kazemi and Behnaz Pahlavsay Since in every cases of the following theorem P(m, n, l 0, l 1,...,l m 1 ) is 3-regular, then Observation 1(iii) follows the next result. Theorem 3.. Let G=P(m, n; l 0, l 1,...,l m 1 ) be a SGPG. If either n is odd and m= or n is even and l i = n, for at least m indices i, then γ 3,t (G)= mn. References [1] S. Gravier, Total domination number of grid graphs, Discrete App. Math. 11 (00), 119 18. [] T.W. Haynes, S.T. Hedetniemi and P.J. Slater (editors), Domination in Graphs: Advanced Topics, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1998. [3] T.W. Haynes, S.T. Hedetniemi and P.J. Slater (editors), Fundamentals of Domination in Graphs, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1998. [] M.A. Henning and A.P. Kazemi, k-tuple total domination in graphs, Discrete App. Math. 158 (010), 1006 1011. [5] M.A. Henning and A.P. Kazemi, k-tuple total domination in cross product graphs, Manuscript. [6] M.L. Saražin, W. Pacco and A. Previtali, Generalizing the generalized Petersen graphs, Discrete Math., 307 (007), 53 53. Adel P. Kazemi, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran. E-mail: adelpkazemi@yahoo.com Behnaz Pahlavsay, master student, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran. E-mail: pahlavsayb@yahoo.com Received November 11, 010 Accepted December 30, 010