STRUCTURES OF MERCURY MERCAPTIDES

Similar documents
The crystal and molecular structure of thioformaldehyde trimer

A and 4 molecules in the unit cell. Final atomic parameters have been obtained from a blockdiagonal

The Crystal Structure of Dihydroxyfulnarie. BY M.P. GUPTA AND N. P. GOPTA Department of Physics, Ranchi University, Ranchi, India

Department' of Inorganic Chemistry, Technical University, Budapest Received Apdl 15, 1972 Presented by dr. J. NAGY. Introduction

Crystals, X-rays and Proteins

Scattering Lecture. February 24, 2014

Crystal lattice Real Space. Reflections Reciprocal Space. I. Solving Phases II. Model Building for CHEM 645. Purified Protein. Build model.

The Crystal Structure of Sodium Pentafluorodistannate(II), NaSn2Fs*

X-ray Diffraction. Diffraction. X-ray Generation. X-ray Generation. X-ray Generation. X-ray Spectrum from Tube

Protein crystallography. Garry Taylor

Data processing and reduction

The Crystal Structure of Iron Pentacarbonyl: Space Group and Refinement of the Structure

An accurate determination of the crystal structure of triclinic potassium dichromate, K, Cr, 0,

X-ray Crystallography. Kalyan Das

Crystal and molecular structure of cis-dichlorobis(triphenylphosphite)

Homework 4 Due 25 October 2018 The numbers following each question give the approximate percentage of marks allocated to that question.

Structure factors again

CRYSTAL CHEMISTRY OF THE BASIC MANGANESE ARSENATES: III. The CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF EVEITE, Mn 2 (OH) (AsO 4 )

Supporting Information

IMFA s. intermolecular forces of attraction Chez Chem, LLC All rights reserved.

The Solid State. Phase diagrams Crystals and symmetry Unit cells and packing Types of solid

Direct Method. Very few protein diffraction data meet the 2nd condition

Protein Crystallography

Earth Solid Earth Rocks Minerals Atoms. How to make a mineral from the start of atoms?

Overview - Macromolecular Crystallography

Supplementary Figure 1: Crystal structure of CRCA viewed along the crystallographic b -direction.

Data Collection. Overview. Methods. Counter Methods. Crystal Quality with -Scans

Phase problem: Determining an initial phase angle α hkl for each recorded reflection. 1 ρ(x,y,z) = F hkl cos 2π (hx+ky+ lz - α hkl ) V h k l

PSD '17 -- Xray Lecture 5, 6. Patterson Space, Molecular Replacement and Heavy Atom Isomorphous Replacement

SOLID STATE 9. Determination of Crystal Structures

2-Methoxy-1-methyl-4-nitro-1H-imidazole

Phase identification and structure determination from multiphasic crystalline powder samples by rotation electron diffraction

Crystal and molecular structure of N-(p-nitrobenzylidene)- 3-chloro-4-fluoroaniline

Schematic representation of relation between disorder and scattering

BOND LENGTHS AND BOND ANGLES IN OCTAHEDRAL, TRIGONAL- BIPYRAMIDAL, AND RELATED MOLECULES OF THE NON-TRANSITION ELEMENTS'

Interplay of hydrogen bonding and aryl-perfluoroaryl interactions in construction of supramolecular aggregates

Physical Chemistry Analyzing a Crystal Structure and the Diffraction Pattern Virginia B. Pett The College of Wooster

Stephen F. Nelsen, Asgeir E. Konradsson, Rustem F. Ismagilov, Ilia A. Guzei N N

COPPER(I) COMPLEXES WITH N-ALLYLAZOMETHINES. IN STRUCTURE FORMATION OF 2CuBr R CH=N C 3 H 5 (R = 2-FURYL) AND CuBr R CH=N C 3 H 5 (R = PHENYL)

CONTRIBUTED PAPERS DETERMINATION OF A DIFFICULT STRUCTURE: A CASE OF STRONG CORRELATIONS BETWEEN PARAMETERS R. KURODA

Anomalous dispersion

Handout 12 Structure refinement. Completing the structure and evaluating how good your data and model agree

OH) 3. Institute of Experimental Physics, Wrocław University, M. Born Sq. 9, Wrocław, Poland

Preliminary investigation of an 8-quinolinol complex of uranium(v1)

metal-organic compounds

C. C. WILSON. ISIS Facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX 11 OQX, UK

Scattering by two Electrons

SHELXC/D/E. Andrea Thorn

Crystal and Molecular Structures of Monomethyl Esters of PDE-I and PDE-II, New Inhibitors of Cyclic Adenosine-3',5'-monophosphate Phosphodiesterase

SOLID STATE 18. Reciprocal Space

What factors affect whether something is a solid, liquid or gas? What actually happens (breaks) when you melt various types of solids?

Synthesis and Structure of the Cadmium (II) Complex: [Cd(C 5 H 5 N) 2 (S 2 CO-n-C 4 H 9 ) 2 ]

The Crystal Structure of Ammonium Silver Dithiocyanate

Jack D. Dunitz. X-Ray Analysis and the Structure of Organic Molecules VCHP. (2nd Corrected Reprint) $ Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta, Basel

CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF Κ3Νa(SeO4)2 AT 340 Κ T. FUKAMI*

CHAPTER 6 CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF A DEHYDROACETIC ACID SUBSTITUTED SCHIFF BASE DERIVATIVE

Chapter 3. The structure of crystalline solids 3.1. Crystal structures

Week 11/Th: Lecture Units 28 & 29

Synthesis of Tetra-ortho-Substituted, Phosphorus- Containing and Carbonyl-Containing Biaryls Utilizing a Diels-Alder Approach

Why do We Trust X-ray Crystallography?

Modelling the PDF of Crystalline Materials with RMCProfile

= (3) V = (4) Å 3 Z =4 Mo K radiation. Data collection. Refinement. R[F 2 >2(F 2 )] = wr(f 2 ) = S = 1.

Crystal Structure of Dichlorodiaquabis-(pdimethylaminobenzaldehyde)manganese(II)

Solid State Spectroscopy Problem Set 7

Structure of Crystalline Solids

Basics of XRD part III

Intermolecular Forces I

Chem 1075 Chapter 13 Liquids and Solids Lecture Outline

Crystal Structure of Nonaaquayttrium(III) Bromate at 100 K

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Electronic Supplementary Information for: Gram-scale Synthesis of a Bench-Stable 5,5 -Unsubstituted Terpyrrole

Crystal and molecular structures of three trimethylamine-boron halide adducts: (CH3)3NBC13, (CH3)3NBBr3, and (CH3)3NBI3*

1. What is the formula for the compound formed by calcium and nitrogen?

= (8) V = (8) Å 3 Z =4 Mo K radiation. Data collection. Refinement. R[F 2 >2(F 2 )] = wr(f 2 ) = S = reflections

organic papers 2-[(Dimethylamino)(phenyl)methyl]benzoic acid

J. Med. Chem., 1996, 39(14), , DOI: /jm960098l

organic papers 2,6-Diamino-3,5-dinitro-1,4-pyrazine 1-oxide Comment

Phys 460 Describing and Classifying Crystal Lattices

Hydrogen bonding in oxalic acid and its complexes: A database study of neutron structures

Structure Factors. How to get more than unit cell sizes from your diffraction data.

The broad topic of physical metallurgy provides a basis that links the structure of materials with their properties, focusing primarily on metals.

Intermolecular Forces, Liquids, Solids. IM Forces and Physical Properties

General theory of diffraction

Ligand Close-Packing Model

Configuration of the C(20) Epimer of 7,8-Dihydrobatrachotoxinin A (x-ray crystallography/frog/venom/phyllobates/cardioactive steroid)

AP Chemistry A. Allan Chapter 8 Notes - Bonding: General Concepts

Unusual Molecular Material formed through Irreversible Transformation and Revealed by 4D Electron Microscopy

Redetermination of Crystal Structure of Bis(2,4-pentanedionato)copper(II)

organic papers Malonamide: an orthorhombic polymorph Comment

Kevin Cowtan, York The Patterson Function. Kevin Cowtan

,

Handout 7 Reciprocal Space

A Primer in X-ray Crystallography for Redox Biologists. Mark Wilson Karolinska Institute June 3 rd, 2014

Aromatic Compounds I

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. (An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118(17), , DOI: /ja953373m

Part II. Fundamentals of X-ray Absorption Fine Structure: data analysis

XRD Intensity Calculations -Example FCC Cu (centric)

Structure and Dynamics : An Atomic View of Materials

High-Throughput in Chemical Crystallography from an industrial point of view

Transcription:

STRUCTURES OF MERCURY MERCAPTIDES PART 11. X-RAY STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF MERCURY ETHYLMERCAPTIDE D. C. BRADLEY~ AND N. R. KUNCHUR~ Department of Chemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario Received November 16, 1964 ABSTRACT The unit cell parameters for Hg(sC~H5)s were determined by X-ray diffraction: a = 7.54 f 0.02; b = 4.87 f 0.01; c = 23.80 f 0.04 A; p = 85". The unit cell contains four formula units, and a complete structural analysis revealed a molecular lattice with insignificant intermolecular bonding involving mercury and sulfur. Interatomic distances (excluding C-H) were determined. INTRODUCTION This work forms a part of the programme of studying the coordination con~pounds of mercaptans with mercury. Recent work (I) showed that mercury nlethyl~nercaptide had an unusual structure and it seemed worthwhile to investigate the structure of nlercury ethylmercaptide. The crystal structure Hg(S.C2Hj)2 was partially solved by Wells (2) but his results were qualitative. The ~vork described in the present paper was carried out to locate all atoins (except hydrogens) in order to establish the stereochenlistry of mercury in this con~pound and to obtain reliable values for the dimensions of the molecule. EXPERIMENTAL Mercury ethylmercaptide H~(S.CBH~)B was prepared by Wertheim's method (3) and purified by crystallization from ethanol. It forms thin plates on (001) outlined by (110) faces. With Cu I<, radiation (A = 1.542 A) the compound had a high absorption coefficient of 421 cm-l. Unfortunately the thinness and fragility of the crystals prevented them from being ground into spheres or cylinders to facilitate the absorption correction. The thin plates were cut into needles with square cross-section of 0.1 mm. Absorption corrections were applied assuming that the needles were cylinders of diameter 0.1 mm. The cell parameters were a = 7.54 f 0.02 A; b = 4.87 f 0.01 A; c = 23.80 f 0.04 A; P = 85"; Z = 4; denled = 2.45 g cm-i; dabs = 2.47 g cm-l; space group = Cc. The intensity data on h01 and Okl reflections were collected using the multifilm technique and a range of exposure times on a Stoe Weissenberg camera. Intensities were estimated visually and corrected for Lorentz and polarization factors. The relative FO values were scaled by Wilson's method, and in the final stages the scaling was improved by comparison with the calculated structure amplitudes. Strz~ctz~re Determination Although the systematic absences correspond to the space groups Cc and C2/c, the latter space group was discarded on the basis of the intensities of the reflections hkl with 1 odd. The space group Cc has no special positions and so all atoms have to be placed in general positions. h01 and Okl, being the best resolved projections, were considered for structure determination. Patterson syntheses computed for these projections gave the following coordinates for the mercury atom. r/a Y /b Z/C Hg 0.000 0.218 0.000 The contribution of mercury to the structure amplitude is such that it has only a real component for hkl with 1 even and only an imaginary component for hkl with 1 odd. A mercury-phased Fourier has, therefore, a higher symmetry than the real symmetry with the result that for every peak in a k01 Fourier map, another peak related to the first by a center of symmetry (which is at origin where mercury is placed) would be produced. So if the distribution of two sulfur atoms and four carbon atoms around mercury is acentric, four peaks for two sulfur atoms and eight peaks for four carbon atoms would be produced. Since the stereochemistry of the mercury mercaptide molecule was not known, the problem of locating the light sulfur and carbon atoms was solved by the following procedure. lpresent address: Chentistry Department, Qzleen Mary College, London, England. 2Present address: Center for Crystallographic Research, Roswell Park Meelnorial Institzlte, Bz~falo, N. 1: Correspondence regarding this co?niizz~nication skoz~ld be sent to this address. Canadian Journal of Chemistry. Volume 43 (1965) 2786

BRADLEY AND KUNCHUR: STRUCTURES OF MERCURY MERCAPTIDES. PART II 2787 The values for atomic scattering factors for all atoms were taken from ref. 4. A mean isotropic temperature factor B = 2.8 AZ was applied to the scattering curves of all atoms. Fob, were brought on the absolute scale by il'ilson's method. Both the h01 and Okl Patterson projections showed clearly peaks corresponding to mercury-sulfur interactions. Since the coordinates of lnercury were known, the coordinates of sulfur were derived. Structure factors were calculated for mercury and one sulfur atom only. For the reflections hkl with 1 even, both mercury and sulfur contributed to the real part of the structure amplitude and only sulfur contributed to the imaginary part. Contribution of mercury was subtracted from the real part while the imaginary part was not changed since it did not have any contribution from mercury. Phase angles were calculated using the modified realcomponent and the unmodified imaginary component. Thesephaseangleswere used for computing a mercury difference Fourier. The coefficients used in this Fourier were obtained by subtracting the contribution of mercury from the Fob, which were brought on an absolute scale. A similar procedure was carried out for reflection hkl with 1 odd. Only sulfur contributed to the real part and both sulfur and mercury contributed to the imaginary part of these reflections. The 1201 and Okl lnercury difference Fourier done in this manner revealed the positions of all sulfur and carboll atoms. New phase angles were calculated considering all light atoms in the structure factor calculations, and a second cycle of lnercury difference Fourier syntheses was carried out. rl third cycle was repeated so that the atomic coordinates of all atoms were further refined. The 'y' coordinate of mercury was also refined during these successive Fourier syntheses. The final agreement index for various groups of reflections is shown in Table I. The final mercury difference Fourier projections upon (010) and (001) are shown in Figs. 1 and 3. The final coordinates are listed in Table I1 while the observed and calculated structure factors including the phase angles are listed in Table IV. The lowest value of FO which could be observe3 was 8, and hence unobserved reflections are indicated as < 8. The agreement index stated in Table I takes into account observed reflections as well as observed and unobserved reflections. TABLE I Agreement Agreement No. of index for index for No. of observed observed observed and Type of observed and unobserved reflections unobserved reflections reflections reflections only reflections &01 55 h01 32 Okl (= 2n) 24 Okl (= 2n + 1) 22 TABLE I1 TABLE I11 Interatomic distances and bond angles Distance (A) Angles (O) Hgi-SI 2.45 I-Ig~Slcl 106 Hg1-s~ 2.45 HglSK3 106 Hg1-SB 3.56 SICICZ 103 Hgl-Sd 3.53 SZCG I16 SI-C1 1.65 HglSaIlg, 100 SZ-C~ 1.65 HglSlHg~ 99 C1-CZ 1.54 SaHglSl 84 Cx-Ca 1.84 S~H~ZSI 83 Hgi... Hgl 4.87f0.02 Hgl... HgZ 4.65f0.02 -.

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY. VOL. 43. 19G5 TABLE IV

BRADLEY AND KUKCHUR: STRUCTURES OF MERCURY MERCAPTIDES. PART I1 TABLE IV (Continued) h k 1 Fo FO Alpha0 2 0 20 42.0 32.1 357.3 2 0 22 28.0 28.1 1.5 2 0 24 17.0 20.3 0.7 2 0 26 <8.0 11.9 355.8 2 0 28 <8.0 9.3 6.0 4 0 2 48.0 46.1 359.6 4 0 4 50.0 41.2 1.0 4 0 6 34.0 26.8 358.7

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY. VOL. 43, 1965 TABLE IV (Concluded) h k I Fo Fa Alpha0 0 4 2 21.0 19.7 359.8 0 4 4 19.0 16.1 10.0 0 4 6 19.0 13.6 355.5 0 4 8 15.0 13.2 0.7 0 4 10 17.0 14.4 358.2 0 4 12 15.0 14.4 352.8 0 4 14 15.0 16.7 3.0 0 4 16 15.0 13.5 0.2 0 4 18 12.0 9.0 5.2 0 4 20 <7.0 7.5 3.9 0 4 22 <7.0 6.0 353.9 0 4 24 <8.0 1.0 223.9 Diffraction Effects and tlze Accz~racy of Coordinates The diffraction effects due to the presence of heavy mercury atom were eliminated by doing mercury difference Fourier syntheses. A rough estimate regarding the accuracy of the coordinates was obtained by comparing the common '2' coordinates of the atoms in the two projections. The deviations in the coordinates of mercury and sulfur are found to be 0.01 a and 0.05 A respectively. All carbon atoms excepting carbon C4 correspond to reasonable bond lengths and bond angles within the molecule. The bond length C3-C4 of 1.84 a is much longer than one would expect. On the whole one can state that all carbon atoms have been located and thus the stereochemistry of the mercury mercaptide molecule was defined..... 0 -a '12 FIG. 1. Electron density projection along b axis. Contours are drawn at equal arbitrary intervals. FIG. 2. Interpretation diagram for Fig. 1.

BRADLEY AND KUNCHUR: STRUCTURES OF MERCURY MERCAPTIDES. PART I1 FIG. 3. Electron density projection along a axis. Contours are drawn at equal arbitrary intervals. FIG. 4. Interpretation diagram for Fig. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The various bond lengths and bond angles obtained froin the final coordinates are shown in Table 111. The arrangement of the molecules in the (h01) and (Okl) projections can be seen in Figs. 2 and 4 respectively. In the crystal structure a simple inolecule C2HzS-Hg-SC2Hj contains two Hg-S bonds which are linear within the experimental errors, the Hg-S distance being 2.45 A for both these bonds. There are four more sulfur atoms arranged at a distance of 3.54 A from each nlercury arranged in a square planar configuration. The short Hg-S bonds are perpendicular to this plane so that a mercury atoin is surrounded by six sulfur atoms in a distorted octahedral arrangement. The low melting point of this coinpound (76 "C) suggests that the sulfur atoms at 3.53 A and 3.56 A froin mercury do not give rise to strong interinolecular bonds. A comparison of this compound with inercury methylillercaptide (I) shows that the next longer Hg-S bond lengths of 3.25 A in the latter are slightly shorter than in the for~ner. The higher melting point of Hg(SCH3)2 (175") suggests that the secondary interactions are of greater significance in this compound. Also the larger size of the ethylmercaptide group leads to a looser packing of the inercury ethylmercaptide inolecules and hence the crystal structure is essentially illolecular in type. It is noteworthy that the estimated sum of the Van der

2702 C.1NADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY. VOL. -13. 1965 Waal's radii of mercury sulfur of 3.35 A is greater than the secondary Hg... S bond lengths in Hg(SCH3)Z but less than those in Hg(SC2HG)z. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are indebted to the U.S. Office of Naval Research for supporting this research. We thank Mr. W. Wilson of the Coinputation Center for much help in writing the programs in Fortran IV for IBM 7040 compiiter and Dr. J. Hart for providing the computing facilities. REFERENCES 1. D. C. BRADLEY and N. R. KUNCHUR. J. Chem. Phys. 40, 2258 (1964). 2. A. F. WELLS. Z. Icrist. 96, 435 (193'7). 3. E. WERTHEIM. J. Atn. Chem. Soc. 51,3661 (1929). 4. INTERNATIONAL TABLES FOR X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY. Vo1. 111. Birmingham : Icynoch Press. 1962.