Influence of Calcium-induced Aggregation on the Sensitivity of. Aminobis(methylenephosphonate)-Containing Potential MRI Contrast.

Similar documents
Electronic Supplementary Information for Dalton Transactions This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006

shift, the solution was introduced into spherical glass containers fitting into ordinary 10-mm NMR

SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE 1: ADDITIONAL CHARACTERIZATION OF NANODIAMOND SOLUTIONS AND THE OVERHAUSER EFFECT

Relaxivity: definitions

K ex. Conformational equilibrium. equilibrium K B

Supplementary information for. Water-Exchange Rates of Lanthanide Ions in an Ionic Liquid

Electronic Supplementary Material

Effects of Chemical Exchange on NMR Spectra

Introduction to Relaxation Theory James Keeler

NMR Dynamics and Relaxation

Lecture #6 Chemical Exchange

Chem 325 NMR Intro. The Electromagnetic Spectrum. Physical properties, chemical properties, formulas Shedding real light on molecular structure:

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Biophysical Chemistry: NMR Spectroscopy

Inorganic Spectroscopic and Structural Methods

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Effects of Chemical Exchange on NMR Spectra

Scalar (contact) vs dipolar (pseudocontact) contributions to isotropic shifts.

The Basics of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Physikalische Chemie IV (Magnetische Resonanz) HS Solution Set 2. Hand out: Hand in:

The Physical Basis of the NMR Experiment

Magnetic Resonance in magnetic materials

Gold Nanoparticles Functionalized with Gadolinium Chelates as High Relaxivity MRI Contrast Agents.

Slow symmetric exchange

10.4 Continuous Wave NMR Instrumentation

Chemistry 213 Practical Spectroscopy

Lecture 6: Physical Methods II. UV Vis (electronic spectroscopy) Electron Spin Resonance Mossbauer Spectroscopy

Polarised Nucleon Targets for Europe, 2nd meeting, Bochum 2005

NMR: Formalism & Techniques

Appendix II - 1. Figure 1: The splitting of the spin states of an unpaired electron

4) protons experience a net magnetic field strength that is smaller than the applied magnetic field.

Basic principles of multidimensional NMR in solution

Chemistry 431. Lecture 23

V27: RF Spectroscopy

Lecture 3: Light absorbance

Supporting Information

1 Magnetism, Curie s Law and the Bloch Equations

Solid-state NMR and proteins : basic concepts (a pictorial introduction) Barth van Rossum,

NMR Spectroscopy. Guangjin Hou

Biophysical Chemistry: NMR Spectroscopy

Electron Spin Resonance, Basic principle of NMR, Application of NMR in the study of Biomolecules, NMR imaging and in vivo NMR spectromicroscopy

NMR-spectroscopy of proteins in solution. Peter Schmieder

ν 1H γ 1H ν 13C = γ 1H 2π B 0 and ν 13C = γ 13C 2π B 0,therefore = π γ 13C =150.9 MHz = MHz 500 MHz ν 1H, 11.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

Quantification of Dynamics in the Solid-State

Chapter 13 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy II. 13 C NMR. Reading: Pavia Chapter , 6.7, 6.11, 6.13

Solution Set 3. Hand out : i d dt. Ψ(t) = Ĥ Ψ(t) + and

Nuclear Effects in Electron Capture into Highly Charged Heavy Ions

BROOKLYN COLLEGE Department of Chemistry. Chemistry 1 Second Lecture Exam Nov. 27, Name Page 1 of 5

Biomedical Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging

NMR, the vector model and the relaxation

Coupling of Functional Hydrogen Bonds in Pyridoxal-5 -phosphate- Enzyme Model Systems Observed by Solid State NMR

Journal of the Korean Magnetic Resonance Society 2003, 7, Kwangju, , KOREA Received September 29, 2003

Biochemistry 530 NMR Theory and Practice

22.56J Noninvasive Imaging in Biology and Medicine Instructor: Prof. Alan Jasanoff Fall 2005, TTh 1-2:30

MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY

Muons in Chemistry Training School Dr N J Clayden School of Chemistry University of East Anglia Norwich

MR Fundamentals. 26 October Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft

Experiment 7: Dynamic NMR spectroscopy (Dated: April 19, 2010)

Supporting information

6 NMR Interactions: Zeeman and CSA

Principles of Molecular Spectroscopy: Electromagnetic Radiation and Molecular structure. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)

Introduction to MRI. Spin & Magnetic Moments. Relaxation (T1, T2) Spin Echoes. 2DFT Imaging. K-space & Spatial Resolution.

Lecture #7 In Vivo Water

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Protein dynamics from NMR Relaxation data

A. K. R. Junker et al 1 Investigating subtle 4f vs. 5f...

'H NMR Techniques in Studies of Transport of Paramagnetic Ions in Multicellular Systems

5 questions, 3 points each, 15 points total possible. 26 Fe Cu Ni Co Pd Ag Ru 101.

Characterization and suppression techniques for degree of radiation damping. in inversion recovery measurements

Contrast mechanisms in magnetic resonance imaging

Midterm Exam: CHEM/BCMB 8190 (148 points) Friday, 3 March, 2017

Electronic Supplementary Information

Química Orgânica I. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (I) Ciências Farmacêuticas Bioquímica Química AFB QO I 2007/08 1 AFB QO I 2007/08 2

Advanced Quadrupolar NMR. Sharon Ashbrook School of Chemistry, University of St Andrews

NMR in Medicine and Biology

compound Cs 2 Cu 2 Mo 3 O 12

Rb-Xe spin relaxation in dilute Xe mixtures

Overhauser Magnetometers For Measurement of the Earth s Magnetic Field

Supporting Information for

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: Tools for Structure Determination

Two-dimensional Exchange 35 Cl NQR Spectroscopy of Chloral Hydrate

Supporting Information

Inorganic Chemistry Laboratory

NMR course at the FMP: NMR of organic compounds and small biomolecules - II -

NMR Studies of Polyethylene: Towards the Organization of Semi Crystalline Polymers

CH103 General Chemistry II 2018 Fall semester Quiz 4

Ga(III) complexes of DOTA and DOTA-monoamide: kinetic and thermodynamic stability.

Supplementary Material for. Concentration Dependent Effects of Urea. Binding to Poly-N-isopropylacrylamide Brushes:

Relaxation. Ravinder Reddy

NAME: 3rd (final) EXAM

INTRODUCTION TO NMR and NMR QIP

ESR spectroscopy of catalytic systems - a primer

Electronic Supplementary Information

Spin Relaxation and NOEs BCMB/CHEM 8190

A Mn(III) single ion magnet with tridentate Schiff-base ligands

Spin Cut-off Parameter of Nuclear Level Density and Effective Moment of Inertia

TITAN: Two-dimensional lineshape analysis

Factoring 15 with NMR spectroscopy. Josefine Enkner, Felix Helmrich

Transcription:

Supporting Information for Influence of Calcium-induced Aggregation on the Sensitivity of Aminobis(methylenephosphonate)-Containing Potential MRI Contrast Agents Jörg Henig, Ilgar Mamedov, Petra Fouskova, Éva Tóth, Nikos K. Logothetis, Goran Angelovski, * and Hermann A. Mayer * Institut für Anorganische Chemie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 8, 7076 Tübingen, Germany, Abteilung für Physiologie kognitiver Prozesse, Max-Planck-Institut für biologische Kybernetik, Spemannstrasse 38, 7076 Tübingen, Germany, Centre de Biophysique Moléculaire, CNRS rue Charles Sadron, 4507 Orléans, Cedex, France and Division of Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester M3 9PT, U. K. Table S. Relaxometric Ca + titration of GdL at 5 C, ph 7.3 and 9.4 T [Gd 3+ ] (mm) [Ca + ] (mm) [Ca + ]/[SCA] T (s) r (mm - s - ).490 0.000 0.00 56.869 6.95.44.5 0.50 58.070 6.904.394.404.00 58.7 7.0.349 3.538.5 59.9 7.033.306 4.630.0 6.075 6.943.64 5.68.5 6.07 6.940.3 6.696 3.0 63.405 6.99.84 7.675 3.5 64.874 6.890.47 8.6 4.0 66.457 6.839.0 9.534 4.5 67.90 6.806.075 0.47 5.0 69.336 6.774

Table S. Relaxometric Ca + titration of GdL at 5 C, ph 7.3 and 9.4 T [Gd 3+ ] (mm) [Ca + ] (mm) [Ca + ]/[SCA] T (s) r (mm - s - ).500 0.000 0.00 5.783 7.43.45.5 0.50 54.596 7.34.404.404.00 58.8 7.004.358 3.538.50 6.67 6.70.35 4.630.00 65.38 6.455.73 5.68.50 68.07 6.307.3 6.696 3.00 70.769 6.66.93 7.675 3.50 7.075 6.60.55 8.6 4.00 74.706 6.04.9 9.534 4.50 76.659 5.984.083 0.47 5.00 80.068 5.89 Table S3. Relaxometric Ca + titration of GdL 3 at 5 C, ph 7.3 and 9.4 T [Gd 3+ ] (mm) [Ca + ] (mm) [Ca + ]/[SCA] T (s) r (mm - s - ).50 0.000 0.00 57.987 6.698.47.5 0.50 6.94 6.83.43.404 0.99 7.899 5.589.377 3.538.49 8.757 4.99.333 4.630.98 87.04 4.768.9 5.68.48 9.989 4.534.50 6.696.98 95.433 4.494. 7.675 3.47 98.4 4.43.7 8.6 3.97 00.7 4.44.36 9.534 4.46 0.64 4.39.00 0.47 4.96 04.09 4.395 Table S4. Relaxometric Ca + titration of GdL 4 at 5 C, ph 7.3 and 9.4 T [Gd 3+ ] (mm) [Ca + ] (mm) [Ca + ]/[SCA] T (s) r (mm - s - ).540 0.000 0.00 66.734 5.755.490.5 0.49 7.389 5.400.44.404 0.98 8.963 4.846.396 3.538.48 95.5 4.33.35 4.630.97 05.05 3.89.309 5.68.46 09.75 3.788.68 6.696.95 5.38 3.665.8 7.675 3.44 8.46 3.66.90 8.6 3.94 0.84 3.6.53 9.534 4.43 3.08 3.604.7 0.47 4.9 7.43 3.543

Figure S. 3 P{ H} NMR spectra of EuL at 98 K. *Impurity from the ligand synthesis, being hardly visible in solutions of the free ligand, but more intense in these spectra as it experiences only a weak paramagnetic influence. Figure S. 3 P{ H} NMR spectra of EuL at different temperatures. *Impurity from the ligand synthesis (see above). 348 K 38 K 50 0-50 -00 ppm 98 K Figure S3. 3 P{ H} NMR spectra of EuL at 98 K in the absence of Ca + ions (a) and in the presence of three equiv. Ca + ions (b). *Impurity from the ligand synthesis. a) b) * * 0-50 -00 ppm 0-50 -00 ppm 3

Figure S4. Luminescence emission spectra of EuL (5 mm) in the presence and absence of 3 equiv. Ca + (5 C, ph 7.3, HEPES). 5x0 5 EuL EuL + Ca + 4x0 5 Intensity [a.u.] 3x0 5 x0 5 x0 5 0 550 600 650 700 750 λ [nm] Figure S5. Luminescence emission spectra of EuL 3 (5 mm) in the presence and absence of 3 equiv. Ca + (5 C, ph 7.3, HEPES). 4x0 5 EuL 3 EuL 3 + Ca + Intensity [a.u.] 3x0 5 x0 5 x0 5 0 550 600 650 700 750 λ [nm] 4

Table S5. Emission lifetimes and estimated q values of EuL in Ca + -free solution and upon addition of 3 equiv. Ca + (5 o C, HEPES, ph 7.3) τ HO (ms) τ DO (ms) q EuL 50 mm 0.43.34.6 5 mm 0.43.36.6 0 mm 0.43.38.6 5 mm 0.4.37.7 EuL + 3 equiv. Ca + 50 mm 0.73.59 0.6 5 mm 0.65.7 0.8 0 mm 0.58.76. 5 mm 0.54.75. Figure S6. Estimated q values of EuL in Ca + -free solution and upon addition of 3 equiv. Ca + (5 o C, HEPES, ph 7.3).8.6.4 Apparent q value..0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0. EuL EuL + 3 equiv Ca + 0.0 0 0 0 30 40 50 EuL [mm] 5

Table S6. Emission lifetimes and estimated q values of EuL in Ca + -free solution and upon addition of 3 equiv. Ca + (5 o C, HEPES, ph 7.3) τ HO (ms) τ DO (ms) q EuL 40 mm 0.66.45 0.7 0 mm 0.63.46 0.8 0 mm 0.60.48 0.9 5 mm 0.58.55.0 EuL + 3 equiv. Ca + 40 mm 0.77.45 0.4 0 mm 0.75.57 0.5 0 mm 0.7.64 0.6 5 mm 0.68.65 0.7 Figure S7. Estimated q values of EuL in Ca + -free solution and upon addition of 3 equiv. Ca + (5 o C, HEPES, ph 7.3)..0 Apparent q value 0.8 0.6 0.4 0. EuL EuL + 3 equiv Ca + 0.0 0 0 0 30 40 EuL [mm] 6

Table S7. Emission lifetimes and estimated q values of EuL 3 in Ca + -free solution and upon addition of 3 equiv. Ca + (5 o C, HEPES, ph 7.3) τ HO (ms) τ DO (ms) q EuL 3 3 mm 0.67.50 0.7 6 mm 0.6.60 0.9 8 mm 0.55.64. 4 mm 0.50.63.4 EuL 3 + 3 equiv. Ca + 3 mm 0.86.45 0.3 6 mm 0.86.48 0.3 8 mm 0.85.53 0.3 4 mm 0.84.60 0.4 Figure S8. Estimated q values of EuL 3 in Ca + -free solution and upon addition of 3 equiv. Ca + (5 o C, HEPES, ph 7.3).6.4 EuL 3 EuL 3 + 3 equiv Ca +. Apparent q value.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0. 0.0 0 0 0 30 EuL 3 [mm] 7

Table S8. Emission lifetimes and estimated q values of EuL 4 in Ca + -free solution and upon addition of 3 equiv. Ca + (5 o C, HEPES, ph 7.3) τ HO (ms) τ DO (ms) q EuL 4 50 mm 0.69.5 0.6 5 mm 0.67.59 0.7 0 mm 0.66.65 0.8 5 mm 0.65.66 0.8 EuL 4 + 3 equiv. Ca + 50 mm 0.88.57 0.3 5 mm 0.88.6 0.3 0 mm 0.88.70 0.4 5 mm 0.89.75 0.4 Figure S9. Estimated q values of EuL 4 in Ca + -free solution and upon addition of 3 equiv. Ca + (5 o C, HEPES, ph 7.3)..0 EuL 4 EuL 4 + 3 equiv Ca + Apparent q value 0.8 0.6 0.4 0. 0.0 0 0 0 30 40 50 EuL 4 [mm] 8

Figure S0. Potentiometric titration curve of GdL. 0 8 ph 6 4 0 0 0.5.5.5 3 3.5 base equivalents Figure S. Potentiometric titration curve of GdL. 0 8 ph 6 4 0 0 0.5.5.5 3 3.5 base equivalents 9

Figure S. Potentiometric titration curve of GdL 3. 0 8 ph 6 4 0 0 0.5.5.5 3 3.5 base equivalents Figure S3. Potentiometric titration curve of GdL 4. 0 8 ph 6 4 0 0 0.5.5.5 3 3.5 base equivalents 0

Figure S4: H-/T of GdL 4 in the presence of 3 equivalents of Ca + as a function of the temperature, (.5 mm, 500 MHz). Figure S5: 7 O T values as a function of temperature for GdL 4, (c = 50 mm, B =.75 T).

Equations used for the analysis of the 7 O NMR data From the measured 7 O NMR relaxation rates of the paramagnetic solutions, /T, /T, and of the reference, /T A, /T A, one can calculate the reduced relaxation rates, /T r, /T r, which may be written as in Equations ()-(), where P m is the molar fraction of bound water, /T m, /T m are the relaxation rates of the bound water and ω m is the chemical shift difference between bound and bulk water. = = Tr Pm T TA T m +τ m () = = Tr Pm T TA τ m T - - m + τ m Tm + - - ( τ m + Tm ) + ω ω m m () ω m is determined by the hyperfine or scalar coupling constant, A/h, according to Equation (3), where B represents the magnetic field, S is the electron spin and g L is the isotropic Landé g factor. ω m = g L µ BS ( S+ ) B A 3k T h B (3) The 7 O longitudinal relaxation rates are given by Equation (4), where γ S is the electron and γ I is the nuclear gyromagnetic ratio (γ S =.76 0 rad s - T -, γ I =-3.66 0 7 rad s - T - ), r is the effective distance between the electron charge and the 7 O nucleus, I is the nuclear spin (5/ for 7 O), χ is the quadrupolar coupling constant and η is an asymmetry parameter: µ 0 h I S d = γ γ S( S+ ) 6 6 τ d+ 4 τ m 5 4π rgdo + ωsτ d T 3π + 0 I + 3 χ (+ η / 3) τ I (I ) RO (4) where:

τ = τ + τ + di m RO T i e i =, (5) The τ RO overall rotational correlation time is assumed to have simple exponential temperature dependence with E R activation energy as follows: 98 ER τ RO = τ RO exp (6) R T 98.5 In the transverse relaxation the scalar contribution, /T sc, is the most important [Eq. (7)]. /τ s is the sum of the exchange rate constant and the electron spin relaxation rate. T T m sc 3 = + τ s τ m S( S+ ) A = τ h T e s (7) (8) The inverse binding time (or exchange rate, k ex ) of water molecules in the inner sphere is assumed to obey the Eyring equation [Eq. (9)], where S and H are the entropy and enthalpy of activation for the exchange, and k ex 98 is the exchange rate at 98.5 K. τ m = k ex kbt = h S exp R H RT 98 k ex T H = exp 98.5 R 98.5 T (9) The electron spin relaxation rate, /T e has been fitted to a simple exponential equation: 98 E / T e = / Te exp (0) R T 98.5 T 3

7 O NMR spectroscopy on GdL, GdL and GdL 3 For complexes GdL (Figure S6), GdL and GdL 3 (Figure S7), the reduced 7 O transverse relaxation rates (/T r ) decrease with increasing temperature in the whole temperature range investigated, indicating that they are in the fast exchange region. For GdL and GdL 3, the experimentally measured paramagnetic 7 O chemical shifts were considerably smaller than what would be expected for a Gd 3+ complex with the given q value, therefore, they have not been included in the final fitting. Figure S6. Variable temperature reduced 7 O transverse ( ) and longitudinal ( ) relaxation rates and chemical shifts ( ) for GdL. B =.75 T. The lines correspond to the least-squares fit as explained in the text.. Figure S7. Variable temperature reduced 7 O transverse ( ) and longitudinal ( ) relaxation rates for GdL (a) and GdL 3 (b). B =.75 T. The lines correspond to the least-squares fit as explained in the text.. Even though.7 has been obtained for EuL from the luminescence lifetime measurements and the possibility of the existence of some dehydrated species with non coordinated phosphonate groups cannot be excluded from the luminescence and 3 P NMR data, the hydration number of GdL was fixed to one in this analysis, as correlates better with the obtained values of the reduced chemical shifts ω r. For GdL and GdL 3 the increased formation of aggregates at 50 mm concentration leads to a reduction of inner sphere 4

water, which was indicated by a drop in q to 0.7 in the concentration-dependent q measurements. However, as the equation applied is not optimized for these systems, the reduction can also be due to a change in the second coordination sphere and the number of inner sphere water molecules might still be one. Therefore, for GdL and GdL 3 two fits of the 7 O NMR data were performed assuming q = 0.7 or (Figure S7 shows the fit with q = ).The experimental data have been fitted to the Solomon-Bloembergen-Morgan theory of paramagnetic relaxation. In the fitting procedure, r GdO has been fixed to the common value of.50 Å. 5 The quadrupolar coupling constant χ(+η /3) / has been set to the value for pure water, 7.58 MHz. For GdL and GdL 3, the scalar coupling constant A/ħ, was fixed to -3.6 MHz, the value obtained for GdL. The electron spin relaxation rate /T e, has been fitted to a simple exponential function. Since it has a negligible contribution to the transverse relaxation rates, the fit of parameters related to the zero-field splitting mechanism, as usually done, has very low confidence. The following parameters have been adjusted: the water exchange rate k 98 ex, or the activation entropy S, the activation enthalpy for water exchange H, the rotational correlation time τ 98 RO, and its activation energy E R, as well as the electron spin relaxation rate at 98 K /T 98 e (Table S9) and its activation energy E T. When E T was fixed to kj/mol, /T 98 e was calculated between (.-.3) 0 7 s -, otherwise small negative values were obtained. Table S9. Parameters obtained from the fitting of the 7 O NMR data at.75 T. GdL GdL GdL 3 GdDOTA b q a 0.7 0.7 k 98 ex / 0 6 s - 70±3 60±5 0±5 90±5 30±0 4. H / kj mol - 7.±0.5 6.8±0.4 6.3±0.4 3.4±0.5 3.4±0.5 49.8 S / J mol - K - 0± -3± -36± -4± -44± +48.5 A/h / 0 6 rad s - -3.6±0.3-3.6 a -3.6 a -3.6 a -3.6 a -3.7 τ 98 RO / ps 90±0 390±0 540±0 380±0 550±0 90 E R / kj mol - 7.8±0.9 7.±0.7 6.3±0.7 6.5±0.9 6.6±.0 7 a fixed in the fit. b Ref.: Powell, D. H.; NiDhubhghaill, O. M.; Pubanz, D.; Helm, L.; Lebedev, Y. S.; Schlaepfer, W.; Merbach, A. E., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 996, 8, 9333-9346. Note that by assuming q = for GdL we calculate k ex 98 = 3.4 0 8 s -. 5

Table S0. Variable temperature reduced longitudinal and transverse 7 O relaxation rates and chemical shifts of GdL aqueous solution. c Gd = 0.0509694 mol/kg. B =.75 T T (K) Shift T/ms(ref) T/ms(ref) (ref)/ppm T/ms T/ms ln(/tr) Shift/ppm ln(/tr) ωr /Hz 78. 3.990 3.97.566 3.080 0.904-0.53.30 3.74-9.74E+05 83. 4.65 4.63.389 3.537.088-0.849. 3.55 -.04E+06 93. 6.09 6.05 0.76 4.754.6 -.435 0.83 3. -.0E+06 300.8 7.663 7.464 0.45 5.804.7 -.64 0.73.78-9.63E+05 308. 9.436 9.4 0.39 7.03.804 -.7 0.58.50-8.64E+05 38..633.408-0.3 8.699 3.830 -.97 0.36.5-7.70E+05 38. 3.89 3.656-0.935 0.70 5. -.539 0.04.80-7.45E+05 338. 6.508 6.44 -.03.767 6.756 -.6 9.87.46-6.54E+05 348. 9.548 9.4 -.697 4.906 8.40 -.905 9.76.0-5.6E+05 Table S. Variable temperature reduced longitudinal and transverse 7 O relaxation rates and chemical shifts of GdL aqueous solution. c Gd = 0.054087 mol/kg. B =.75 T T (K) Shift T/ms(ref) T/ms(ref) (ref)/ppm T/ms T/ms ln(/tr) Shift/ppm ln(/tr) ωr /Hz 78. 3.94 3.870..89.44 0.669.44 3.6-6.4E+05 88. 5.57 5.6.79 3.769.34 0.57.6 3.5-6.5E+05 300.8 7.673 7.46 0.87 5.5.808-0.88.00.88-6.97E+05 308. 9.307 8.674 0.66 6.7.86 -.045 0.8.68-6.65E+05 38..99.070 0.34 7.549.736 -.99 0.6.46-6.53E+05 38. 3.833 3.686-0.484 9.49 3.588 -.00 0.36.7-6.05E+05 338. 6.496 6.44-0.68.309 4.568 -.039 0.7.90-5.66E+05 348. 9.48 8.784 -. 3.747 5.76 -.069 9.90.63-3.86E+05 6

Table S. Variable temperature reduced longitudinal and transverse 7 O relaxation rates and chemical shifts of GdL 3 aqueous solution. c Gd = 0.063339 mol/kg. B =.75 T T (K) Shift T/ms(ref) T/ms(ref) (ref)/ppm T/ms T/ms ln(/tr) Shift/ppm ln(/tr) ωr /Hz 78. 3.94 3.870..753.34.55.0.95 -.76E+05 88. 5.57 5.6.79 3.753.5 0.858 0.85.65 -.69E+05 300.8 7.673 7.46 0.87 4.84.758-0.307 0.87.59-3.39E+05 308. 9.307 8.674 0.66 5.740.39-0.50 0.7.38-3.5E+05 38..99.070 0.34 7.84.78-0.68 0.44.4 -.76E+05 38. 3.833 3.686-0.484 8.87 3.40 -.47 0..9 -.84E+05 338. 6.496 6.44-0.68 0.985 4.38 -.95 9.93.68 -.95E+05 348. 9.48 8.784 -. 3.0 4.58 -.63 9.70.6 -.53E+05 Table S3. Variable temperature reduced longitudinal and transverse 7 O relaxation rates and chemical shifts of GdL 4 aqueous solution. c Gd = 0.054087 mol/kg. B =.75 T T (K) Shift T/ms(ref) T/ms(ref) (ref)/ppm T/ms T/ms ln(/tr) Shift/ppm ln(/tr) ωr /Hz 78. 3.990 3.97.566 3.85.77..09.68 -.95E+05 83. 4.65 4.63.389 3.6985.004 0.90 0.95.58 -.4E+05 93. 6.09 6.05 0.76 4.885.50 0.36 0.64.39 -.30E+05 300.8 7.663 7.464 0.45 5.96.974-0.4 0.58.5 -.5E+05 308. 9.436 9.4 0.39 7.096 3.560-0.33 0.49.08 -.63E+05 38..633.408-0.3 8.64 4.0-0.66 0.33.98 -.5E+05 38. 3.89 3.656-0.935 0.55 4.466 -.36 0.7.95 -.87E+05 338. 6.508 6.44 -.03.7 4.656 -.64 9.99.97 -.84E+05 348. 9.548 9.4 -.697 4.635 4.564 -.069 9.90.05 -.63E+05 7

Table S4. Variable temperature reduced longitudinal and transverse 7 O relaxation rates and chemical shifts of GdL aqueous solution. c Gd = 0.0509694 mol/kg; in the presence of three equivalents of calcium; B =.75 T T (K) T/ms T/ms Shift/ppm T/ms(ref) T/ms(ref) Shift (ref)/ppm ln(/tr) ln(/tr) ωr /Hz 78..750.54.38 3.94 3.870..68 3.40-4.E+05 300.8 5.098.38 0.8 7.673 7.46 0.87.8.68-3.0E+05 38. 6.589 3.0-0.6.99.070 0.34.4.44 -.3E+05 338. 9.398 4.660-0.83 6.496 6.44-0.68 0.8.03-9.89E+04 8

9