Graded modules over classical simple Lie algebras

Similar documents
Background on Chevalley Groups Constructed from a Root System

Permutation representations and rational irreducibility

THE THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT

Quantizations and classical non-commutative non-associative algebras

Group Gradings on Finite Dimensional Lie Algebras

Real and p-adic Picard-Vessiot fields

Finite Subgroups of Gl 2 (C) and Universal Deformation Rings

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

Math 210C. The representation ring

What is the Tits index and how to work with it

Simply connected gradings of complex matrix algebra

COURSE SUMMARY FOR MATH 504, FALL QUARTER : MODERN ALGEBRA

The Ring of Monomial Representations

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007

Math 250: Higher Algebra Representations of finite groups

THE SEMISIMPLE SUBALGEBRAS OF EXCEPTIONAL LIE ALGEBRAS

The Cartan Decomposition of a Complex Semisimple Lie Algebra

Character tables for some small groups

NAVARRO VERTICES AND NORMAL SUBGROUPS IN GROUPS OF ODD ORDER

Representation Theory

Simple classical Lie algebras in characteristic 2 and their gradations, II.

LIE ALGEBRAS: LECTURE 7 11 May 2010

Classification of discretely decomposable A q (λ) with respect to reductive symmetric pairs UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO

Lie Algebras of Finite and Affine Type

We then have an analogous theorem. Theorem 1.2.

Discrete Series and Characters of the Component Group

On the modular curve X 0 (23)

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7.

Exercises on chapter 4

Representation Theory

Twisted group ring isomorphism problem

Order 3 elements in G 2 and idempotents in symmetric composition algebras. Alberto Elduque

Math 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition

(E.-W. Zink, with A. Silberger)

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III

On the Tits-Kantor-Koecher Lie algebra of a von Neumann algebra

Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille

REPRESENTATION THEORY NOTES FOR MATH 4108 SPRING 2012

A PROOF OF BURNSIDE S p a q b THEOREM

The Gelfand-Tsetlin Basis (Too Many Direct Sums, and Also a Graph)

Overview of Atiyah-Singer Index Theory

REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE

Representations and Linear Actions

IVAN LOSEV. KEK 1 = q 2 E, KF K 1 = q 2 F, EF F E = K K 1 q q 1.

International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 13 No , M-GROUP AND SEMI-DIRECT PRODUCT

Thin Coverings of Modules

EXERCISES IN MODULAR FORMS I (MATH 726) (2) Prove that a lattice L is integral if and only if its Gram matrix has integer coefficients.

Zero cycles on twisted Cayley plane

IVAN LOSEV. Lemma 1.1. (λ) O. Proof. (λ) is generated by a single vector, v λ. We have the weight decomposition (λ) =

Rank 3 Latin square designs

The Structure of Hopf Algebras Acting on Galois Extensions

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

SOME DESIGNS AND CODES FROM L 2 (q) Communicated by Alireza Abdollahi

arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 1 Mar 2013

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Weights

Algebra Exam Topics. Updated August 2017

On the Irreducibility of the Commuting Variety of the Symmetric Pair so p+2, so p so 2

A relative version of Kostant s theorem

Nonsolvable Groups with No Prime Dividing Three Character Degrees

Thus we get. ρj. Nρj i = δ D(i),j.

Thin Coverings of Modules

Artin s and Brauer s Theorems on Induced. Characters

arxiv: v2 [math.gr] 7 Nov 2015

CHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0. Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld. University of Chicago

SERRE S CONJECTURE AND BASE CHANGE FOR GL(2)

Category O and its basic properties

REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE: EXERCISES. Notation. 1. GL n

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY

REPRESENTATION THEORY FOR FINITE GROUPS

REPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEKS 10 11

Representations Are Everywhere

HONDA-TATE THEOREM FOR ELLIPTIC CURVES

Groups and Representations

Primitive arcs in P G(2, q)

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS

Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture

9 Artin representations

Math 594. Solutions 5

Math 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems

AN UPPER BOUND FOR SIGNATURES OF IRREDUCIBLE, SELF-DUAL gl(n, C)-REPRESENTATIONS

A Problem of Hsiang-Palais-Terng on Isoparametric Submanifolds

VARIATIONS ON THE BAER SUZUKI THEOREM. 1. Introduction

Gradings on Lie Algebras of Cartan and Melikian Type

KIRILLOV THEORY AND ITS APPLICATIONS

MATH 527, Topics in Representation Theory

CONJECTURES ON CHARACTER DEGREES FOR THE SIMPLE THOMPSON GROUP

COUNTING INVOLUTIONS. Michael Aschbacher, Ulrich Meierfrankenfeld, and Bernd Stellmacher

A method for construction of Lie group invariants

REPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS

The Outer Automorphism of S 6

Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups

Lifting Galois Representations, and a Conjecture of Fontaine and Mazur

Killing Vector Fields of Constant Length on Riemannian Normal Homogeneous Spaces

A Structure Theorem for Plesken Lie Algebras over Finite Fields

ON THE CHIEF FACTORS OF PARABOLIC MAXIMAL SUBGROUPS IN FINITE SIMPLE GROUPS OF NORMAL LIE TYPE

On the Self-dual Representations of a p-adic Group

CHARACTERS OF FINITE GROUPS.

CHAPTER 6. Representations of compact groups

ERRATA. Abstract Algebra, Third Edition by D. Dummit and R. Foote (most recently revised on March 4, 2009)

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

Transcription:

Graded modules over classical simple Lie algebras Alberto Elduque Universidad de Zaragoza (joint work with Mikhail Kochetov)

Graded modules. Main questions Graded Brauer group Brauer invariant Solution to the main questions Brauer invariants for the representations of the classical simple Lie algebras 2 / 35

Graded modules. Main questions Graded Brauer group Brauer invariant Solution to the main questions Brauer invariants for the representations of the classical simple Lie algebras 3 / 35

Setting 4 / 35

Setting G: abelian group, 4 / 35

Setting G: abelian group, L: finite dimensional G-graded semisimple Lie algebra/ F (algebraically closed ground field of characteristic 0): L = g G L g, [L g, L h ] L gh g, h G. 4 / 35

Setting G: abelian group, L: finite dimensional G-graded semisimple Lie algebra/ F (algebraically closed ground field of characteristic 0): L = g G L g, [L g, L h ] L gh g, h G. W : finite dimensional L-module with a compatible G-grading: W = g G W g, L g W h W gh g, h G. 4 / 35

Setting G: abelian group, L: finite dimensional G-graded semisimple Lie algebra/ F (algebraically closed ground field of characteristic 0): L = g G L g, [L g, L h ] L gh g, h G. W : finite dimensional L-module with a compatible G-grading: W = g G W g, L g W h W gh g, h G. 4 / 35

Setting G: abelian group, L: finite dimensional G-graded semisimple Lie algebra/ F (algebraically closed ground field of characteristic 0): L = g G L g, [L g, L h ] L gh g, h G. W : finite dimensional L-module with a compatible G-grading: W = g G W g, L g W h W gh g, h G. By complete reducibility, W is a direct sum of simple graded modules. 4 / 35

Main questions 5 / 35

Main questions (Q1) What the simple graded modules look like? 5 / 35

Main questions (Q1) What the simple graded modules look like? (Q2) Which L-modules admit a compatible G-grading? 5 / 35

Graded modules. Main questions Graded Brauer group Brauer invariant Solution to the main questions Brauer invariants for the representations of the classical simple Lie algebras 6 / 35

Graded simple associative algebras 7 / 35

Graded simple associative algebras Let R be a finite dimensional G-graded associative algebra/ F: R = g G R g. 7 / 35

Graded simple associative algebras Let R be a finite dimensional G-graded associative algebra/ F: R = g G R g. If R is graded-simple, then R = End D (W ), for a graded division algebra D and a G-graded right D-module W. 7 / 35

Graded simple associative algebras 8 / 35

Graded simple associative algebras Moreover, 8 / 35

Graded simple associative algebras Moreover, W is unique, up to isomorphisms and shifts of the grading. 8 / 35

Graded simple associative algebras Moreover, W is unique, up to isomorphisms and shifts of the grading. The isomorphism class of the G-graded algebra D is determined by R. This class is denoted by [R]. 8 / 35

Graded simple associative algebras Moreover, W is unique, up to isomorphisms and shifts of the grading. The isomorphism class of the G-graded algebra D is determined by R. This class is denoted by [R]. R = M k (D) = M k (F) D, where M k (F) is endowed with an elementary grading: there are g 1,..., g k G with deg(e ij ) = g i g 1 j. (A grading induced by a grading on its irreducible module.) 8 / 35

Graded simple associative algebras Moreover, W is unique, up to isomorphisms and shifts of the grading. The isomorphism class of the G-graded algebra D is determined by R. This class is denoted by [R]. R = M k (D) = M k (F) D, where M k (F) is endowed with an elementary grading: there are g 1,..., g k G with deg(e ij ) = g i g 1 j. (A grading induced by a grading on its irreducible module.) 8 / 35

Graded simple associative algebras Moreover, W is unique, up to isomorphisms and shifts of the grading. The isomorphism class of the G-graded algebra D is determined by R. This class is denoted by [R]. R = M k (D) = M k (F) D, where M k (F) is endowed with an elementary grading: there are g 1,..., g k G with deg(e ij ) = g i g 1 j. (A grading induced by a grading on its irreducible module.) [M r (F)] = 1 if and only if the grading on M r (F) is elementary. 8 / 35

Graded division algebras 9 / 35

Graded division algebras Let D be a G-graded division algebra/ F. 9 / 35

Graded division algebras Let D be a G-graded division algebra/ F. Then the support is a subgroup T G and D = span {X t : t T } where 9 / 35

Graded division algebras Let D be a G-graded division algebra/ F. Then the support is a subgroup T G and D = span {X t : t T } where X s X t = σ(s, t)x st for a 2-cocycle σ : T T F. 9 / 35

Graded division algebras Let D be a G-graded division algebra/ F. Then the support is a subgroup T G and where D = span {X t : t T } X s X t = σ(s, t)x st for a 2-cocycle σ : T T F. X s X t = β(s, t)x t X s, where β : T T F is an alternating bicharacter, uniquely determined by D. 9 / 35

Graded division algebras Let D be a G-graded division algebra/ F. Then the support is a subgroup T G and where D = span {X t : t T } X s X t = σ(s, t)x st for a 2-cocycle σ : T T F. X s X t = β(s, t)x t X s, where β : T T F is an alternating bicharacter, uniquely determined by D. D is simple (ungraded) if and only if β is nondegenerate. 9 / 35

Graded division algebras Let D be a G-graded division algebra/ F. Then the support is a subgroup T G and where D = span {X t : t T } X s X t = σ(s, t)x st for a 2-cocycle σ : T T F. X s X t = β(s, t)x t X s, where β : T T F is an alternating bicharacter, uniquely determined by D. D is simple (ungraded) if and only if β is nondegenerate. [D] is determined by the pair (T, β). 9 / 35

Graded Brauer group 10 / 35

Graded Brauer group If R 1 and R 2 are simple G-graded associative algebras, then so is R 1 R 2, so we may define a product: [R 1 ][R 2 ] := [R 1 R 2 ]. 10 / 35

Graded Brauer group If R 1 and R 2 are simple G-graded associative algebras, then so is R 1 R 2, so we may define a product: [R 1 ][R 2 ] := [R 1 R 2 ]. We thus obtain an abelian group: the graded Brauer group of F. 10 / 35

G-gradings and Ĝ-actions 11 / 35

G-gradings and Ĝ-actions Assume, without loss of generality, that G is finitely generated. Then its character group: Ĝ := Hom(G, F ) is a quasitorus. 11 / 35

G-gradings and Ĝ-actions Assume, without loss of generality, that G is finitely generated. Then its character group: Ĝ := Hom(G, F ) is a quasitorus. The G-gradings on a vector space W (resp., an algebra A) correspond bijectively to the homomorphisms Ĝ GL(W ) (resp. Ĝ Aut(A)), as algebraic groups. 11 / 35

G-gradings and Ĝ-actions Assume, without loss of generality, that G is finitely generated. Then its character group: Ĝ := Hom(G, F ) is a quasitorus. The G-gradings on a vector space W (resp., an algebra A) correspond bijectively to the homomorphisms Ĝ GL(W ) (resp. Ĝ Aut(A)), as algebraic groups. If A = g G A g, then the formula α χ (a) = χ(g)a, for any g G and a A g, gives the homomorphism Ĝ Aut(A) : χ α χ. 11 / 35

G-gradings and Ĝ-actions Assume, without loss of generality, that G is finitely generated. Then its character group: Ĝ := Hom(G, F ) is a quasitorus. The G-gradings on a vector space W (resp., an algebra A) correspond bijectively to the homomorphisms Ĝ GL(W ) (resp. Ĝ Aut(A)), as algebraic groups. If A = g G A g, then the formula α χ (a) = χ(g)a, for any g G and a A g, gives the homomorphism Ĝ Aut(A) : χ α χ. Given a homomorphism Ĝ Aut(A) : χ α χ, then A = g G A g with A g := {a A : α χ (a) = χ(g)a χ Ĝ}. 11 / 35

Ĝ-actions and bicharacters 12 / 35

Ĝ-actions and bicharacters Let R be a simple G-graded associative algebra: R = M k (D) = M k (F) D, where D is a simple graded division algebra, D = span {X t : t T }. 12 / 35

Ĝ-actions and bicharacters Let R be a simple G-graded associative algebra: R = M k (D) = M k (F) D, where D is a simple graded division algebra, D = span {X t : t T }. Any χ Ĝ determines an automorphism α χ of R, which is the conjugation by an element of the form ( ) u χ = diag χ(g 1 ),..., χ(g k ) X t. 12 / 35

Ĝ-actions and bicharacters Let R be a simple G-graded associative algebra: R = M k (D) = M k (F) D, where D is a simple graded division algebra, D = span {X t : t T }. Any χ Ĝ determines an automorphism α χ of R, which is the conjugation by an element of the form ( ) u χ = diag χ(g 1 ),..., χ(g k ) X t. Then u χ1 u χ2 = ˆβ(χ 1, χ 2 )u χ2 u χ1, with ˆβ(χ 1, χ 2 ) = β(t 1, t 2 ). 12 / 35

Ĝ-actions and bicharacters Let R be a simple G-graded associative algebra: R = M k (D) = M k (F) D, where D is a simple graded division algebra, D = span {X t : t T }. Any χ Ĝ determines an automorphism α χ of R, which is the conjugation by an element of the form ( ) u χ = diag χ(g 1 ),..., χ(g k ) X t. Then u χ1 u χ2 = ˆβ(χ 1, χ 2 )u χ2 u χ1, with ˆβ(χ 1, χ 2 ) = β(t 1, t 2 ). ˆβ : Ĝ Ĝ F is an alternating bicharacter: the commutation factor for the action of Ĝ. 12 / 35

Graded Brauer group and commutation factors 13 / 35

Graded Brauer group and commutation factors T and β are recovered from ˆβ as ( ) ( ) T = rad ˆβ = {g G : χ(g) = 1 χ rad ˆβ}, β(t 1, t 2 ) = ˆβ(χ 1, χ 2 ), where χ i is any character such that ˆβ(ψ, χ i ) = ψ(t i ) for any ψ Ĝ, i = 1, 2. 13 / 35

Graded Brauer group and commutation factors T and β are recovered from ˆβ as ( ) ( ) T = rad ˆβ = {g G : χ(g) = 1 χ rad ˆβ}, β(t 1, t 2 ) = ˆβ(χ 1, χ 2 ), where χ i is any character such that ˆβ(ψ, χ i ) = ψ(t i ) for any ψ Ĝ, i = 1, 2. Then the class [R] in the Brauer group can be identified with the pair (T, β), and with the commutation factor ˆβ. 13 / 35

Graded Brauer group and commutation factors T and β are recovered from ˆβ as ( ) ( ) T = rad ˆβ = {g G : χ(g) = 1 χ rad ˆβ}, β(t 1, t 2 ) = ˆβ(χ 1, χ 2 ), where χ i is any character such that ˆβ(ψ, χ i ) = ψ(t i ) for any ψ Ĝ, i = 1, 2. Then the class [R] in the Brauer group can be identified with the pair (T, β), and with the commutation factor ˆβ. If [R i ] ˆβ i, i = 1, 2, then [R 1 ][R 2 ] = [R 1 R 2 ] ˆβ 1 ˆβ 2. 13 / 35

Graded modules. Main questions Graded Brauer group Brauer invariant Solution to the main questions Brauer invariants for the representations of the classical simple Lie algebras 14 / 35

Ĝ-action on modules 15 / 35

Ĝ-action on modules Let L be a semisimple finite-dimensional G-graded Lie algebra. 15 / 35

Ĝ-action on modules Let L be a semisimple finite-dimensional G-graded Lie algebra. Consider the associated homomorphism ( ) Ĝ Aut(L) Aut(U(L)) : χ α χ. (Hence α χ (x) = χ(g)x for x L g.) 15 / 35

Ĝ-action on modules Let L be a semisimple finite-dimensional G-graded Lie algebra. Consider the associated homomorphism ( ) Ĝ Aut(L) Aut(U(L)) : χ α χ. (Hence α χ (x) = χ(g)x for x L g.) Let W be a module for L endowed with a compatible G-grading, and let ϕ : Ĝ GL(W ) : χ ϕ χ the associated action. The compatibility condition is equivalent to: ϕ χ (xw) = α χ (x)ϕ χ (w) for any x L, w W, χ Ĝ. 15 / 35

Ĝ-action on modules Let L be a semisimple finite-dimensional G-graded Lie algebra. Consider the associated homomorphism ( ) Ĝ Aut(L) Aut(U(L)) : χ α χ. (Hence α χ (x) = χ(g)x for x L g.) Let W be a module for L endowed with a compatible G-grading, and let ϕ : Ĝ GL(W ) : χ ϕ χ the associated action. The compatibility condition is equivalent to: ϕ χ (xw) = α χ (x)ϕ χ (w) for any x L, w W, χ Ĝ. That is, ϕ χ is an isomorphism W W αχ, so any module with a compatible G-grading must satisfy W = W αχ for any χ Ĝ. 15 / 35

Induced action on isomorphism classes of modules 16 / 35

Induced action on isomorphism classes of modules Aut(L) acts (on the right) on the set of isomorphism classes of L-modules: for any α Aut(L) and L-module V, V α denotes the L-module defined on the same vector space V, but with the twisted action : x.v = α(x)v for any x L and v V. 16 / 35

Induced action on isomorphism classes of modules Aut(L) acts (on the right) on the set of isomorphism classes of L-modules: for any α Aut(L) and L-module V, V α denotes the L-module defined on the same vector space V, but with the twisted action : x.v = α(x)v for any x L and v V. If α Int(L), then V α = V, so the action of Aut(L) factors through Out(L) = Aut(L)/ Int(L). 16 / 35

Induced action on dominant integral weights 17 / 35

Induced action on dominant integral weights Fix a Cartan subalgebra and a system {α 1,..., α r } of simple roots, and let Λ + be the set of dominant integral weights. Then we get a bijection : {Action of Aut(L) on isomorphism classes of irreducible L-modules} {Action of Out(L) on Λ + obtained by permutation of the vertices of the Dynkin diagram} 17 / 35

Action of Ĝ on Λ+ 18 / 35

Action of Ĝ on Λ+ Then Ĝ acts on the isomorphism classes of irreducible L-modules and, for any χ Ĝ, the automorphism α χ Aut(L) projects onto some τ χ Out(L). 18 / 35

Action of Ĝ on Λ+ Then Ĝ acts on the isomorphism classes of irreducible L-modules and, for any χ Ĝ, the automorphism α χ Aut(L) projects onto some τ χ Out(L). For any dominant integral weight λ Λ + consider the inertia group K λ := {χ Ĝ : τ χ(λ) = λ} = {χ Ĝ : V λ = (V λ ) αχ }. 18 / 35

Action of Ĝ on Λ+ Then Ĝ acts on the isomorphism classes of irreducible L-modules and, for any χ Ĝ, the automorphism α χ Aut(L) projects onto some τ χ Out(L). For any dominant integral weight λ Λ + consider the inertia group K λ := {χ Ĝ : τ χ(λ) = λ} = {χ Ĝ : V λ = (V λ ) αχ }. K λ is (Zariski) closed in Ĝ and [Ĝ : K λ] is finite. 18 / 35

Action of Ĝ on Λ+ Then Ĝ acts on the isomorphism classes of irreducible L-modules and, for any χ Ĝ, the automorphism α χ Aut(L) projects onto some τ χ Out(L). For any dominant integral weight λ Λ + consider the inertia group K λ := {χ Ĝ : τ χ(λ) = λ} = {χ Ĝ : V λ = (V λ ) αχ }. K λ is (Zariski) closed in Ĝ and [Ĝ : K λ] is finite. Therefore, H λ := ( K λ ) is a finite subgroup of G, of size H λ = Ĝλ (the size of the orbit of λ), and K λ is isomorphic to the group of characters of G/H λ. 18 / 35

Irreducible modules do not admit in general a compatible G-grading, but... 19 / 35

Irreducible modules do not admit in general a compatible G-grading, but... Let V λ be the irreducible L-module with highest weight λ, ρ : U(L) End(V λ ) the associated representation. 19 / 35

Irreducible modules do not admit in general a compatible G-grading, but... Let V λ be the irreducible L-module with highest weight λ, ρ : U(L) End(V λ ) the associated representation. We cannot expect V λ to be endowed with a compatible G-grading. However: 19 / 35

Irreducible modules do not admit in general a compatible G-grading, but... Let V λ be the irreducible L-module with highest weight λ, ρ : U(L) End(V λ ) the associated representation. We cannot expect V λ to be endowed with a compatible G-grading. However: There is a representation (as algebraic groups): K λ Aut ( End(V λ ) ) χ α χ, where α χ ( ρ(x) ) = ρ ( αχ (x) ) for any x U(L), which corresponds to a compatible Ḡ := G/H λ -grading on End(V λ ). (Recall that K λ is isomorphic to the character group of G/H λ.) 19 / 35

Brauer invariant and Schur index 20 / 35

Brauer invariant and Schur index The class [End(V λ )] in the the Brauer invariant of λ. (Notation: Br(λ)) (G/H λ ) -graded Brauer group is called 20 / 35

Brauer invariant and Schur index The class [End(V λ )] in the the Brauer invariant of λ. (Notation: Br(λ)) (G/H λ ) -graded Brauer group is called The degree of the graded division algebra D representing Br(λ) is called the Schur index of λ. 20 / 35

Brauer invariant and Schur index 21 / 35

Brauer invariant and Schur index Proposition The L-module (V λ ) k admits a Ḡ = G/H λ -grading that makes it a graded simple L-module (where L is endowed with the natural induced Ḡ-grading) if and only if k equals the Schur index of λ. 21 / 35

Brauer invariant and Schur index Proposition The L-module (V λ ) k admits a Ḡ = G/H λ -grading that makes it a graded simple L-module (where L is endowed with the natural induced Ḡ-grading) if and only if k equals the Schur index of λ. This grading is unique up to isomorphism and shift. 21 / 35

Brauer invariant and Schur index Proposition The L-module (V λ ) k admits a Ḡ = G/H λ -grading that makes it a graded simple L-module (where L is endowed with the natural induced Ḡ-grading) if and only if k equals the Schur index of λ. This grading is unique up to isomorphism and shift. Sketch of proof: End((V λ ) k ) = M k (F) End(V λ ). If k is the Schur index of λ and D represents Br(λ), then D op = M k (F). Thus End((V λ ) k ) admits a Ḡ-grading with End((V λ ) k ) = D op End(V λ ) = D op M r (D). Hence [End((V λ ) k )] = 1, so the Ḡ-grading on (V λ ) k is elementary, i.e., it is induced by a Ḡ-grading on (V λ) k. 21 / 35

Graded modules. Main questions Graded Brauer group Brauer invariant Solution to the main questions Brauer invariants for the representations of the classical simple Lie algebras 22 / 35

Induced graded vector space 23 / 35

Induced graded vector space Let H be a finite subgroup of G, Ḡ = G/H, and let U = ḡ Ḡ U ḡ be a Ḡ-graded vector space. 23 / 35

Induced graded vector space Let H be a finite subgroup of G, Ḡ = G/H, and let U = ḡ Ḡ U ḡ be a Ḡ-graded vector space. Then K = H is a finite index subgroup of Ĝ and W = IndĜK U := FĜ FK U is a Ĝ-module; i.e., a G-graded vector space. 23 / 35

Induced graded vector space Let H be a finite subgroup of G, Ḡ = G/H, and let U = ḡ Ḡ U ḡ be a Ḡ-graded vector space. Then K = H is a finite index subgroup of Ĝ and W = IndĜK U := FĜ FK U is a Ĝ-module; i.e., a G-graded vector space. If U is a Ḡ-graded L-module, then W is a G-graded L-module: x.(χ u) := χ α χ 1(x)u. 23 / 35

Graded simple modules: (Q1) 24 / 35

Graded simple modules: (Q1) For each Ĝ-orbit O in Λ+, select a representative λ. 24 / 35

Graded simple modules: (Q1) For each Ĝ-orbit O in Λ+, select a representative λ. If k is the Schur index of V λ, equip U = (V λ ) k with a compatible ( G/Hλ ) -grading and consider W (O) := IndĜK λ U. 24 / 35

Graded simple modules: (Q1) For each Ĝ-orbit O in Λ+, select a representative λ. If k is the Schur index of V λ, equip U = (V λ ) k with a compatible ( G/Hλ ) -grading and consider W (O) := IndĜK λ U. Theorem Up to isomorphisms and shifts, the W (O) s are the graded-simple finite dimensional L-modules. 24 / 35

Modules admitting compatible gradings: (Q2) 25 / 35

Modules admitting compatible gradings: (Q2) Theorem An L-module V admits a compatible G-grading if and only if for any λ Λ + the multiplicities of V µ in V, for all the elements µ in the orbit Ĝλ, are equal and divisible by the Schur index of λ. 25 / 35

Modules admitting compatible gradings: (Q2) Theorem An L-module V admits a compatible G-grading if and only if for any λ Λ + the multiplicities of V µ in V, for all the elements µ in the orbit Ĝλ, are equal and divisible by the Schur index of λ. In particular, for λ Λ +, V λ admits a compatible G-grading if and only if H λ = 1 and Br(λ) = 1. 25 / 35

Graded modules. Main questions Graded Brauer group Brauer invariant Solution to the main questions Brauer invariants for the representations of the classical simple Lie algebras 26 / 35

Given λ Λ +, the computation of Br(λ) can be reduced to the computation of Br(ω 1 ),..., Br(ω r ), where ω 1,..., ω r are the fundamental weights. 27 / 35

Given λ Λ +, the computation of Br(λ) can be reduced to the computation of Br(ω 1 ),..., Br(ω r ), where ω 1,..., ω r are the fundamental weights. For the simple Lie algebras of types G 2, F 4 and E 8, these Brauer invariants are always trivial. Therefore, any module admits a compatible grading. 27 / 35

Type A: inner 28 / 35

Type A: inner L = sl r+1 (F) and assume that the image of Ĝ Aut(L) is contained in Int(L). α 1 α 2 α r 1 α r 28 / 35

Type A: inner L = sl r+1 (F) and assume that the image of Ĝ Aut(L) is contained in Int(L). α 1 α 2 α r 1 α r In this case the G-grading in L is induced by a G-grading on R = M r+1 (F). 28 / 35

Type A: inner L = sl r+1 (F) and assume that the image of Ĝ Aut(L) is contained in Int(L). α 1 α 2 α r 1 α r In this case the G-grading in L is induced by a G-grading on R = M r+1 (F). For any λ = r i=1 m iω i Λ +, H λ = 1 and Br(λ) = ˆβ r i=1 im i, where ˆβ : Ĝ Ĝ F is the commutation factor for the action of Ĝ on R. 28 / 35

Type A: outer 29 / 35

Type A: outer L = sl r+1 (F) and assume that the image of Ĝ Aut(L) is not contained in Int(L). 29 / 35

Type A: outer L = sl r+1 (F) and assume that the image of Ĝ Aut(L) is not contained in Int(L). Then there exists a distinguished element h G of order 2 such that the induced Ḡ = G/ h -grading on L is inner : H ω1 = h. 29 / 35

Type A: outer L = sl r+1 (F) and assume that the image of Ĝ Aut(L) is not contained in Int(L). Then there exists a distinguished element h G of order 2 such that the induced Ḡ = G/ h -grading on L is inner : H ω1 = h. For any λ = r i=1 m iω i Λ +, If m i m r+1 i for some i, then H λ = h and Br(λ) = ˆβ r i=1 im i, where ˆβ is the commutation factor for the action of (G/ h ) on R. If r is even and m i = m r+1 i for all i, then H λ = 1 and Br(λ) = 1. If r is odd and m i = m r+1 i for all i, then H λ = 1, but Br(λ) may be nontrivial (the description is quite technical). 29 / 35

Type B 30 / 35

Type B L = so 2r+1 (F), r 2. α 1 α 2 α r 2 α r 1 α > r 30 / 35

Type B L = so 2r+1 (F), r 2. α 1 α 2 α r 2 α r 1 α > r Then the module V ω1 is the natural (2r + 1)-dimensional module, for i = 2,..., r 1, V ωi = i V ω1, and V ωr is the spin module (i.e., the irreducible module for the even Clifford algebra Cl 0 (V ω 1 )). 30 / 35

Type B L = so 2r+1 (F), r 2. α 1 α 2 α r 2 α r 1 α > r Then the module V ω1 is the natural (2r + 1)-dimensional module, for i = 2,..., r 1, V ωi = i V ω1, and V ωr is the spin module (i.e., the irreducible module for the even Clifford algebra Cl 0 (V ω 1 )). The G-grading on L is always induced by a compatible G-grading on V ω1. 30 / 35

Type B L = so 2r+1 (F), r 2. α 1 α 2 α r 2 α r 1 α > r Then the module V ω1 is the natural (2r + 1)-dimensional module, for i = 2,..., r 1, V ωi = i V ω1, and V ωr is the spin module (i.e., the irreducible module for the even Clifford algebra Cl 0 (V ω 1 )). The G-grading on L is always induced by a compatible G-grading on V ω1. For any λ = r i=1 m iω i Λ +, H λ = 1 and Br(λ) = ˆγ mr (it depends only on m r!) where ˆγ is the commutation factor of the induced action of Ĝ on Cl 0 (V ω 1 ). 30 / 35

Type C 31 / 35

Type C L = sp 2r (F), r 2. α 1 α 2 α r 2 α r 1 α < r 31 / 35

Type C L = sp 2r (F), r 2. α 1 α 2 α r 2 α r 1 α < r The G-grading on L is induced by a grading on R = M 2r (F) End(V ω1 ). 31 / 35

Type C L = sp 2r (F), r 2. α 1 α 2 α r 2 α r 1 α < r The G-grading on L is induced by a grading on R = M 2r (F) End(V ω1 ). For any λ = r i=1 m iω i Λ +, H λ = 1 and Br(λ) = ˆβ (r+1)/2 i=1 m 2i 1 where ˆβ is the commutation factor of the action of Ĝ on R. 31 / 35

Type D 32 / 35

Type D L = so 2r (F), r 5 (!!). α r 1 α 1 α 2 α r 3 α r 2 α r 32 / 35

Type D L = so 2r (F), r 5 (!!). α r 1 α 1 α 2 α r 3 α r 2 α r Then the module V ω1 is the natural 2r-dimensional module, for i = 2,..., r 2, V ωi = i V ω1, and V ωr 1 and V ωr are the two half-spin modules (i.e., the irreducible modules for the even Clifford algebra Cl 0 (V ω 1 )). 32 / 35

Type D L = so 2r (F), r 5 (!!). α r 1 α 1 α 2 α r 3 α r 2 α r Then the module V ω1 is the natural 2r-dimensional module, for i = 2,..., r 2, V ωi = i V ω1, and V ωr 1 and V ωr are the two half-spin modules (i.e., the irreducible modules for the even Clifford algebra Cl 0 (V ω 1 )). The G-grading on L is induced by a grading on R = M 2r (F) End(V ω1 ). It is said to be inner if the image of Ĝ Aut(L) is contained in Int(L); otherwise it is called outer. 32 / 35

Type D: inner 33 / 35

Type D: inner For any λ = r i=1 m iω i Λ +, H λ = 1 and: If m r 1 m r (mod 2), then Br(λ) depends only on the commutation factor of the action of Ĝ on R. Otherwise it also depends on the commutation factors of the induced action of Ĝ on the two simple ideals of Cl 0 (V ω 1 ). 33 / 35

Type D: outer 34 / 35

Type D: outer Here there exists a distinguished order 2 element h G such that the induced Ḡ = G/ h -grading on L is inner. 34 / 35

Type D: outer Here there exists a distinguished order 2 element h G such that the induced Ḡ = G/ h -grading on L is inner. For any λ = r i=1 m iω i Λ + : If m r 1 m r but m r 1 m r (mod 2), then H λ = h and Br(λ) = 1 (in the G/ h -graded Brauer group!). If m r 1 m r (mod 2), then H λ = h and Br(λ) is given in terms of the commutation factor of (G/ h ) on Cl 0 (V ω 1 ). If m r 1 = m r, then H λ = 1 and Br(λ) = ˆβ r/2 i=1 m 2i 1, where ˆβ is the commutation factor of the action of Ĝ on R. 34 / 35

A. Elduque and M. Kochetov. Gradings on simple Lie algebras. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 189, American Mathematical Society, 2013. A. Elduque and M. Kochetov. Graded modules over classical simple Lie algebras with a grading. Israel J. Math., to appear. 35 / 35

A. Elduque and M. Kochetov. Gradings on simple Lie algebras. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 189, American Mathematical Society, 2013. A. Elduque and M. Kochetov. Graded modules over classical simple Lie algebras with a grading. Israel J. Math., to appear. That s all. Thanks 35 / 35