Norway s Integrated Ocean Management (IOM) Policies and Plans - A Brief Presentation

Similar documents
Council conclusions on Arctic issues. 2985th FOREIGN AFFAIRS Council meeting Brussels, 8 December 2009

Marine Spatial Planning, a Norwegian user case NSHC33

Policy framework The Netherlands and the Polar Regions, Summary and priorities

1. Baltic SCOPE Towards coherence and cross-border solutions in Baltic Maritime Spatial Plans

MODELS AND TOOLS FOR GOVERNANCE OF

Maritime Spatial Planning: Transboundary Cooperation in the Celtic Seas Looking Ahead

Marine Spatial Planning (MSP): A practical approach to ecosystembased

Country Fiche Lithuania

Iceland and the Arctic: The Politics of Territoriality. Valur Ingimundaron Professor of Contemporary History, University of Iceland

PROGRAM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION CHAIRMANSHIP OF THE ARCTIC COUNCIL IN

MR. George ALEXAKIS, parallel session 3. "Mediterranean Sea Region. laying the conditions. for sustainable growth and jobs"

EU s Role IN THE ARCTIC

Maritime Spatial Planning Framework Directive Supported by INSPIRE

HELSINKI COMMISSION Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

Marine/Maritime Spatial Planning Andrej Abramić

Natura 2000 in the marine environment: state of implementation and next steps

CONFERENCE STATEMENT

Annex I. Common criteria for the choice of Protected Marine and Coastal Areas that could be included in SPAMI list

CONFERENCE STATEMENT

Marine Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

A Parliamentary Resolution on Iceland's Arctic Policy

Stewardship of the Central Arctic Ocean: The Arctic 5 versus the international community

Marine Spatial Management Tool

Mediteranean sea issues in the view of ESPON ESaTDOR project and Marine Spatial Planning in Slovenia

National Perspectives - Portugal. Margarida Almodovar

Maritime Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

Tore Henriksen a & Geir Ulfstein b a Faculty of Law, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway. Available online: 18 Feb 2011

SUBJECT: Non paper on the size, nature and dynamics of the blue economy, 15 September 2015, prepared by DG MARE

Baltic Sea Region cooperation in Maritime Spatial Planning - HELCOM/VASAB

VISION FOR THE ARCTIC KIRUNA, SWEDEN 15 MAY 2013

Greenland: Balancing the need for development and environmental protection. Arctic Frontiers 2016 Industry and Environment

PACIFIC ISLANDS REGIONAL OCEAN POLICY. A healthy Ocean that sustains the livelihoods and aspirations of Pacific Island communities.

Dr. Biliana Cicin-Sain President, Global Ocean Forum 1

SEMINAR: ITALIAN-FINNISH COOPERATION IN THE ARCTIC: A GREAT OPPORTUNITY

Maritime delimitation and environmental protection of fragile seas

Polar complications in the law of the sea: A case study of the regime for research and survey activities in the Arctic Ocean

Linking Global and Regional Levels in the Management of Marine Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction

The importance of international university and project cooperation in science

Country Fiche Estonia

Maritime Spatial Planning

Outline National legislative & policy context Regional history with ESSIM ESSIM Evaluation Phase Government Integration via RCCOM Regional ICOM Framew

The Place of Joint Development in the Sustainable Arctic Governance

Dr. Steven Lamy Sophie Cottle

Regional stakeholders strategy of Donegal County Council

SPLAN-Natura Towards an integrated spatial planning approach for Natura th January, 2017 Brussels. Commissioned by DG Environment

EUSAIR on sea topics from Slovenian perspective

Country Fiche Sweden Updated May 2018

THE ROLE OF SPATIAL PLANNING IN INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE INTERREG III B BALTCOAST PROJECT

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 May /14 CULT 68

DELIVERING ECOSYSTEM- BASED MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING IN PRACTICE

Towards international cooperation in the development of Marine Spatial Plans for the North Pacific: economic, social, and environmental dimensions

New Building Blocks in the North. The next Step in the Government s High North Strategy

Real GDP Growth to Clock 6.75 Percent this Fiscal. Economic Survey Predicts Percent Growth in

NOAA Nautical Charts and Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning. Meredith Westington Chief Geographer NOAA/NOS/Office of Coast Survey

Country Fiche Estonia

Ensuring Access to Marine Areas for Offshore Oil and Gas

Offshore Energy and Maritime Spatial Planning in the German EEZ

Arctic ecosystem services: TEEB Arctic Scoping study. Alexander Shestakov WWF Global Arctic Programme 3 December Arctic Biodiversity Congress

Marine Spatial Planning as an important tool for implementing the MSFD

Third Annual Climate Science and Policy Conference, UC Santa Cruz: Earth s Climate Future: Unchartered Territory

I. LIBYA I.1. COUNTRY CHARACTERISTICS. Country reports

A National Ocean Policy for Malaysia: Rationale and Proposed Components. Mohd Nizam Basiron and Cheryl Rita Kaur Maritime Institute of Malaysia

KUNMING FORUM ON UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT CITIES OF THE FUTURE: SMART, RESILIENT

MARINE PLANNING IN THE NETHERLANDS

8 th Arctic Regional Hydrographic Commission Meeting September 2018, Longyearbyen, Svalbard Norway

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

HELCOM-VASAB Maritime Spatial Planning Working Group Twelfth Meeting Gdansk, Poland, February 2016

MESMA: An integrated tool box to support an ecosystem based spatial management of marine areas

Territorial Cooperation within the Northern Periphery and the Arctic

Mediterranean Sea and Territorial Development, Opportunities and Risks

FINDINGS OF THE ARCTIC METEOROLOGY SUMMIT

Introduction to IMP: need and added value

LA POLÍTICA MARÍTIMA INTEGRADA

PRIORITY TWO-YEAR ACTIVITIES ( ) PRIORITY ONE: INTERNATIONAL RECOGNITION OF ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE

Marine Spatial Planning in Hellas; Recent Facts and Perspectives

Derogation Criteria for the Requirements for Generators Network Code

EASTERN SCOTIAN SHELF INTEGRATED OCEAN MANAGEMENT PLAN

Pacific Islands Regional Maritime Boundaries Project

PROGRESS REPORT ON APPROACH PAPER THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GEF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT. GEF/C.49/Inf.04 September 23, 2015

The Arctic Council - 20 years Anniversary

MARITIME PLANNING IN PORTUGAL

CONFERENCE CONCEPT NOTE 2012 NORTH PACIFIC ARCTIC CONFERENCE. Honolulu, Hawaii. August 8 10, 2012

BURGAS CASE STUDY: LAND-SEA INTERACTIONS. Dr. Margarita Stancheva

World Oceans Day 2010 Our oceans: opportunities and challenges

River basin management in a transboundary context: Norwegian experience

Seabed knowledge In support of UN SDGs

Implementation of the Political Declaration on energy cooperation between the North Seas Countries. Support Group 1 on Maritime Spatial Planning

Country Fiche Sweden.

Japan s Arctic Policy

xxv PART I THE DIVIDED OCEANS: INTERNATIONAL LAW GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL ZONES 1

Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Geospatial Technology and Innovation

Identification of maritime spatial planning best practices in the Baltic Sea Region and other EU maritime regions

An Environmental Profile of the Island of Jost Van Dyke, British Virgin Islands

Norwegian MFA Jonas Gahr Støres welcoming remarks at the Sixth Ministerial Meeting of the Arctic Council, Tromsø, 29 April 2009

MSP Process drawings and descriptions

AFCC2/RI-South West Indian Ocean Fisheries Governance and Shared Growth Project 1 (P132123)

Major human activities affecting Norwegian coastal marine ecosystems; present status and challenges

Multilateral Governance in the Arctic via the Arctic Council and its Observers

Shetland Islands Council

Transcription:

OGS/- 20.08.2014. Paper based on an up-dated version of the author's presentation at the seminar "Økosystembasert tilnærming i Norge" ("Ecosystems-based Approach in Norway"), organized by the Tromsø University, at Longyearbyen, Svalbard, 3-5 September 2012. Odd Gunnar Skagestad: Norway s Integrated Ocean Management (IOM) Policies and Plans - A Brief Presentation Any presentation or discussion of Norway's integrated ocean management policies must take into consideration the country's dependence on the sustainable use of the oceans. To the south of the Svalbard archipelago, the Norwegian mainland consists (basically) of a two and a half thousand kilometer long rocky outcrop, jutting into the Arctic Ocean. The arctic waters that adjoin Norway's coasts contain vast natural resources renewable and non-renewable which form the backbone of the country's economy the basis of its livelihood and welfare. Sustainable management In 1987 the World Commission on Environment and Development also known as the Brundtland Commission submitted a report called Our Common Future. 1 This document introduced the term Sustainable Development, defined as development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. The term Sustainable Development was subsequently to become a mantra in world politics it has gained almost universal acceptance as the guiding principle for the management of natural resources. The sustainable development agenda includes the twin concepts of environment conservation and resource management these are actually two aspects of the same issue. Modern management principles include using the best scientific advice and incorporate the ecosystems approach. 1 "Our Common Future", Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development; http://conspect.nl/pdf/our_common_future-brundtland_report_1987.pdf.

2 Among renewable resources, the marine living resources play a particularly important rôle as the basis of the fishing industry. Sustainable use is the main objective of Norwegian fisheries management policies. Thus, for Norway management of marine living resources means sustainable management of fisheries in the broad sense including not only catching fish but also the harvesting of crustaceans (shrimps etc.) and marine mammals (whales and seals). It also means taking into account the effects of fishery management measures on the ecosystem as a whole, as well as monitoring (including regulating) external activities that may affect the management of marine living resources. The High North Long-term conservation and sustainable use based on scientific knowledge and an ecosystem-based approach are key principles of management of natural resources globally. They apply equally to any geographical region or sub-region of the oceans of the world. The Arctic region, including the areas which in Norwegian political vernacular are known as "Nordområdene" or "The High North", are no exception in this regard. Thus, there is nothing unique or special about the Arctic that would call for a substantially different or novel approach to dealing with the issue of sustainable management of marine living resources in the Arctic. 2 There are, however, other considerations including environmental issues - that are important to take into account, and which mutually affect resource management tasks and challenges especially with regard to the coastal waters and the high seas of the High North. The main part of European arctic waters the Barents Sea and the Norwegian Sea contains vast natural resources, - renewable and non-renewable. Among these are some of the world s largest and most valuable fish stocks, including the Northeast Arctic cod, which are also among the best-managed fish stocks in the world. The Arctic region is also the world s largest unexplored prospective area for petroleum, with estimates indicating 2 It should be noted that a corresponding absence of exceptionalism as far as the Arctic is concerned is also to be found with regard to international law: The 1982 U.N. Convention of the Law of the Sea and related global legal instruments apply to the Arctic Ocean and adjacent waters in the same ways and to the same extent as is the case with regard to other maritime areas of the world.

3 that large volumes of oil and gas remain to be found in the area especially offshore. In addition, extensive maritime transport current and prospective through the important shipping lanes of this region, contributes to highlighting the environmental challenges which we are faced with in the High North. Norway's Integrated Ocean Management Plans As a country highly dependent on the sustainable use of the oceans, Norway has for a number of years been working on developing and adopting integrated management plans for its coastal and ocean areas, as a tool for handling such tasks and tackling such challenges as these circumstances entail. The purpose of this endeavour has been and is to provide clear, predictable and operational frameworks for the existing and new activities including the exploitation of the resources and the conservation of the environment in these marine and maritime areas. The aim is furthermore to facilitate long-term and responsible value creation based on the sustainable use of the resources in these ocean areas, while at the same time safeguarding the environment and preserving the structures and productivity of their ecosystems. As a first step, the Norwegian government in 2006 adopted an integrated management plan for the Barents Sea and the ocean areas off the Lofoten archipelago. The plan had an initial time horizon until 2020, with the stipulation that it would be subject to periodic reviews. Such a review was conducted in 2011, when the plan was updated with a new time horizon set to 2040. 3 In the meantime (in 2009) the Norwegian government adopted a corresponding management plan for the Norwegian Sea. 4 3 First update of the Integrated Management Plan for the Marine Environment of the Barents Sea-Lofoten Area. Meld. St. 10 (2010-2011) Report to the Storting (white paper); http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/md/dok/regpubl/stmeld/2010-2011/meld-st-10-20102011.html?id=682050#. 4 Report No.37 to the Storting (2008-2009) Integrated Management of the Marine Environment of the Norwegian Sea; http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/md/dok/regpubl/stmeld/2008-2009/report-no-37-2008-2009-to-thestorting.html?id=577875#.

4 And finally, as yet a further step, the government in 2013 adopted a management plan for the North Sea and the Skagerrak, developed largely along the same pattern as the previous two, abovementioned plans. 5 Main Characteristics The integrated management plans envisage systematic supervision of the ocean environment and measures for managing ocean resources, based on the ecosystem approach. Other main features that characterize this system and contribute to the uniqueness of this particular approach, include the following: In addition to the sector-oriented planning and management, a cross-sectorial perspective has been adopted. Thus, the Norwegian management plans intend be a knowledge-based tool for facilitating value-creation as well as for safeguarding the environment. The plans have been designed to identify measures which enable the authorities to reconcile the need for economic activity within petroleum industry, fisheries and maritime transport with the need to protect the arctic marine environment. The keyword is co-existence within the parameters of sustainable development. In developing the management plans, relevant research institutions, government agencies and management bodies have jointly contributed to the preparation of a common knowledge base for the subsequent political decisions. This has facilitated and strengthened the overall quality of the work. The processes leading up to the eventual adoption of the management plans have been accompanied with a substantial amount of popular consultation ( stakeholder participation ), including open hearings. This is a time-consuming exercise, but it has been considered to be necessary to ensure that all legitimate voices are heard, so that the plans will be as democratically-based as possible. As an additional bonus of positive spin-off from this open and inclusive approach, the very processes of developing the management plans have been a most useful 5 White Paper (Norwegian text only) submitted to the Storting 26 April 2013: Meld. St.37 (2012-2013) Helhetlig forvaltning av det marine miljø i Nordsjøen og Skagerrak (forvaltningsplan); http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/md/dok/regpubl/stmeld/2012-2013/meld-st-37-20122013.html?id=724746.

5 educational experience for everyone involved, enhancing the general level of knowledge in the public debate. It should furthermore be noted that Norway's integrated management plans do not introduce any form of micro-management, such as concrete management decisions or new management bodies to replace existing structures where those are already in place and well-functioning. The plans are designed to provide an operational framework including general guidelines and necessary coordination, not to make specific implementary decisions. Existing, well-functioning management frameworks continue, undisturbed by the presence of new, overarching strategic superstructures. Finally, as mentioned briefly earlier in this presentation, the Norwegian integrated management plans are subject to mandatory periodic reviews (updates). The reason for this is that the plans should be flexible enough to be adjusted or, as the case might be, revised, taking into account new knowledge and new experience and lessons learned en route. This gives each of the plans the extra dimension of being a dynamic process, and not just a plan in the narrow, rigid or static sense. The Regional Context The Norwegian Integrated Ocean Management Plans are national plans i.e. they have a geographical scope confined to waters subject to Norwegian jurisdiction. Nevertheless, some of the key issues currently confronting us in the High North (including, above all, environment conservation and resource management issues) have transboundary aspects, and call for international or regional cooperation, as well as an integrated approach. Thus, even though the eastern (Russian) part of the Barents Sea is not part of the area comprised by the Norwegian Barents Sea management plan, the plan has ramifications with regard to Norway's relations with Russia. Therefore, in the process of developing its plan for the Barents Sea, Norwegian authorities have worked actively to engage Russia in a constructive dialogue. This policy has yielded positive results, such as the cooperation taking place in the Marine Environment Group under the auspices of the Norwegian- Russian Joint Commission on the Environment.

6 The Norwegian government has also conducted constructive dialogues on IOM issues with other neighbours. This includes close cooperation with the EU esp. with regard to the development of the EU s Ocean Strategy Directive (which was adopted in 2009). In the broader regional context, special mention should be made of the substantial contribution provided by Norway to the on-going IOM efforts of the Arctic Council, in particular the project "Best Practices in Ecosystems-based Ocean management in the Arctic" (BEPOMAR). In view of the transboundary aspects of the issues confronting us in the High North, it is the belief of the Norwegian government that its experience with integrated ocean management plans can provide a fruitful input to discussing these issues in a bilateral as well as in a regional setting. Although not pretending to have the final cut-and-dried answers to all the questions and challenges that these issues entail, Norwegian authorities do, however, believe in the virtue of sharing their own experiences with others friends and neighbours, thus hoping to be able to make a difference.