Stat 476 Life Contingencies II. Multiple Life and Multiple Decrement Models

Similar documents
Multiple Decrement Models

Stat Hartman Winter 2018 Midterm Exam 28 February 2018

MLC Fall 2015 Written Answer Questions. Model Solutions

Long-Term Actuarial Mathematics Solutions to Sample Multiple Choice Questions

MLC Fall 2014 Written Answer Questions. Model Solutions

MLC Fall Model Solutions. Written Answer Questions

May 2013 MLC Solutions

SPRING 2005 EXAM M SOLUTIONS. = When (as given in the problem), (x) dies in the second year from issue, the curtate future lifetime x + 1 is 0, so

Fall 2003 Society of Actuaries Course 3 Solutions = (0.9)(0.8)(0.3) + (0.5)(0.4)(0.7) (0.9)(0.8)(0.5)(0.4) [1-(0.7)(0.3)] = (0.

Chapter 2 - Survival Models

Stat 475 Life Contingencies I. Chapter 2: Survival models

Actuarial mathematics

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES. EXAM MLC Models for Life Contingencies EXAM MLC SAMPLE SOLUTIONS. Copyright 2016 by the Society of Actuaries

Heriot-Watt University. M.Sc. in Actuarial Science. Life Insurance Mathematics I. Tutorial 2 Solutions

Manual for SOA Exam MLC.

Errata and Updates for ASM Exam LTAM (First Edition Second Printing) Sorted by Page

Errata and Updates for ASM Exam LTAM (First Edition Second Printing) Sorted by Date

SPRING 2007 EXAM MLC SOLUTIONS

Nonparametric Model Construction

Deeper Understanding, Faster Calculation: MLC, Fall 2011

COURSE 3 MAY 2001 MULTIPLE-CHOICE ANSWER KEY

INVERSE PROBLEMS IN MARKOV MODELS AND MEDICAL INSURANCE

Stat 475. Solutions to Homework Assignment 1

Spring 2012 Exam MLC Solutions

Estimation for Modified Data

Exam MLC Preparation Notes

Notes for Math 324, Part 20

STAT 430/510 Probability Lecture 12: Central Limit Theorem and Exponential Distribution

INVERSE PROBLEMS FOR MARKOV MODELS IN HEALTH INSURANCE. Semyen I. Spivak. The Bashkir State University, Ufa, Russia

Notes for Math 324, Part 19

EXPERIENCE-BASED LONGEVITY ASSESSMENT

EXAMINATION. 13 April 2005 (am) Subject CT4 (103) Models (103 Part) Core Technical. Time allowed: One and a half hours INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CANDIDATE

PAST CAS AND SOA EXAMINATION QUESTIONS ON SURVIVAL

GENERALIZED ANNUITIES AND ASSURANCES, AND INTER-RELATIONSHIPS. BY LEIGH ROBERTS, M.Sc., ABSTRACT

Practice Exam #1 CAS Exam 3L

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES EXAM MLC ACTUARIAL MODELS EXAM MLC SAMPLE SOLUTIONS

Math438 Actuarial Probability

Mixture distributions in Exams MLC/3L and C/4

Inequalities and Accuracy

Homework 1 2/7/2018 SOLUTIONS Exercise 1. (a) Graph the following sets (i) C = {x R x in Z} Answer:

(x 1 +x 2 )(x 1 x 2 )+(x 2 +x 3 )(x 2 x 3 )+(x 3 +x 1 )(x 3 x 1 ).

ACT455H1S - TEST 2 - MARCH 25, 2008

We know from STAT.1030 that the relevant test statistic for equality of proportions is:

Term Insurance vs. Indexed Universal Life

Subject CT4 Models. October 2015 Examination INDICATIVE SOLUTION

Seven Introductory Lectures on Actuarial Mathematics

Lifetime Dependence Modelling using a Generalized Multivariate Pareto Distribution

Notes for Math 324, Part 17

CAS Exam MAS-1. Howard Mahler. Stochastic Models

Honors Advanced Algebra Unit 2 Polynomial Operations September 14, 2016 Task 7: What s Your Identity?

STAT 479: Short Term Actuarial Models

Errata for the ASM Study Manual for Exam P, Fourth Edition By Dr. Krzysztof M. Ostaszewski, FSA, CFA, MAAA

Loop Convergence. CS 536: Science of Programming, Fall 2018

1. If X has density. cx 3 e x ), 0 x < 0, otherwise. Find the value of c that makes f a probability density. f(x) =

ASM Study Manual for Exam P, First Edition By Dr. Krzysztof M. Ostaszewski, FSA, CFA, MAAA Errata

Gaussian integrals. Calvin W. Johnson. September 9, The basic Gaussian and its normalization

Stochastic Modelling Unit 1: Markov chain models

CH 55 THE QUADRATIC FORMULA, PART I

Complex fraction: - a fraction which has rational expressions in the numerator and/or denominator

ASM Study Manual for Exam P, Second Edition By Dr. Krzysztof M. Ostaszewski, FSA, CFA, MAAA Errata

November 2000 Course 1. Society of Actuaries/Casualty Actuarial Society

4 Testing Hypotheses. 4.1 Tests in the regression setting. 4.2 Non-parametric testing of survival between groups

Lecture 6: Sequential Dynamical Systems

One Solution Two Solutions Three Solutions Four Solutions. Since both equations equal y we can set them equal Combine like terms Factor Solve for x

Public Key Encryption

RMSC 2001 Introduction to Risk Management

Math 320-1: Midterm 2 Practice Solutions Northwestern University, Fall 2014

12.1 The Extrema of a Function

Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models 1

Honours Advanced Algebra Unit 2: Polynomial Functions What s Your Identity? Learning Task (Task 8) Date: Period:

green green green/green green green yellow green/yellow green yellow green yellow/green green yellow yellow yellow/yellow yellow

6. The Momentum Equation

Basic methods to solve equations

Chapter 1 Polynomials. This chapter is about polynomials, which include linear and quadratic expressions. When you have completed it, you should

Creating New Distributions

STAT 509 Section 3.4: Continuous Distributions. Probability distributions are used a bit differently for continuous r.v. s than for discrete r.v. s.

Physics 403. Segev BenZvi. Choosing Priors and the Principle of Maximum Entropy. Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Rochester

Nonparametric Predictive Inference (An Introduction)

Course 1 Solutions November 2001 Exams

RMSC 2001 Introduction to Risk Management

CDA6530: Performance Models of Computers and Networks. Chapter 3: Review of Practical Stochastic Processes

The Design of a Survival Study

Lecture On Probability Distributions

AMB111F Notes 3 Quadratic Equations, Inequalities and their Graphs

Chapter 2: Describing Contingency Tables - I

Multistate Modeling and Applications

LECTURE 15: SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION I

EDUCATION AND EXAMINATION COMMITTEE OF THE SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES ACTUARIAL MODELS LIFE CONTINGENCIES SEGMENT POISSON PROCESSES

Exercises. (a) Prove that m(t) =

green green green/green green green yellow green/yellow green yellow green yellow/green green yellow yellow yellow/yellow yellow

6.1 Antiderivatives and Slope Fields Calculus

Approximate inference, Sampling & Variational inference Fall Cours 9 November 25

A DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING APPROACH. Guy Hawerstock Dan Ilan

Solutions. 1. Use the table of integral formulas in Appendix B in the textbook to help compute the integrals below. u du 9 + 4u + C 48

Homogeneous Backward Semi-Markov Reward Models for Insurance Contracts

Chapter 4 Deliberation with Temporal Domain Models

Transform Techniques - CF

22. RADICALS. x add 5. multiply by 7

18.465, further revised November 27, 2012 Survival analysis and the Kaplan Meier estimator

Chapter 4 Page 1 of 16. Lecture Guide. Math College Algebra Chapter 4. to accompany. College Algebra by Julie Miller

Transcription:

Stat 476 Life Contingencies II Multiple Life and Multiple Decrement Models

Multiple Life Models To this point, all of the products we ve dealt with were based on the life status (alive / dead or multi-state) of a single individual. However, in order to deal with products involving multiple lives, we need more comple models. These future lifetimes may be dependent or independent. The force of transition from state i to state j based on the joint life statuses of () and (y) is denoted by µ ij y or µ ij :y, with the latter being preferred when we have numerical values for and/or y. 2

Joint Life Model () alive (y) alive () alive (y) dead 0 1 () dead (y) alive 2 () dead (y) dead 3 The model above could be used in cases where cash flows depend on the status of two lives () and (y). If the model allows a transition from state 0 directly to state 3, it s known as a common shock model. 3

Traditional Multiple Life Status Actuarial Notation The subscript y denotes a status which fails upon the first of the future lifetimes of () and (y) to fail. Likewise, the status y fails upon the failure of the second failure of () and (y). We will use these statuses in the same manner we used the single life status and the term status n This notation follows the same convention we used earlier for term products and guaranteed annuities. Then T y is the random variable describing the time until the first death of () and (y), and T y is the RV giving the time until the second death of () and (y). Important Relationship T + T y = T y + T y 4

Multiple Life Probability Definitions and Relationships µ y = force of mortality for the joint status y = µ 01 y + µ 02 y + µ 03 y tp y = P[the status y does not fail within t years] = P[() and (y) are both alive in t years] = t p 00 y tq y = P[the status y fails within t years] = 1 t p y = P[() and (y) are not both alive in t years] = t py 01 + t py 02 + t py 03 5

Multiple Life Probability Definitions and Relationships tp y = P[the status y does not fail within t years] = P[() or (y) or both are still alive in t years] = t py 00 + t py 01 + t py 02 tq y = P[the status y fails within t years] = 1 t p y = P[() and (y) are both dead in t years] = t p 03 y We have the following relationship for () and (y): tp + t p y = t p y + t p y Further, we define n E y = v n np y and n E y = v n np y 6

More Multiple Life Probability Definitions and Relationships We also use the numbers 1, 2,... above the individual life statuses to indicate a specific order of status failure: t q 1 y = P[() dies before (y) and within t years] = t 0 sp 00 y µ 02 +s:y+s ds t q 2 y = P[() dies after (y) and within t years] = t 0 sp 01 y µ 13 +s ds Note that we can let t be in either of these symbols. 7

Insurances and Annuities Based on Multiple Lives We can derive some relationships among the various multiple life insurances and annuities: A y + A y = A + A y a y + a y = a + a y a y = 1 A y δ a y = a y a y a y = 1 A y δ a y + a y = a y a y 8

Two Independent Lives In the special case where we re dealing with two future lifetimes that are independent, many of our epressions become much simpler. In this event, all of the forces of transition only depend on a single life, so in our joint life model, we would have: µ 01 y = µ 23 y = µ y µ 02 y = µ 13 = µ µ 03 y = 0 As a result, our transition probabilities become functions of the individual survival probabilities: tp 00 y = t p t p y t p 01 y = t p t q y t p 00 y = t p t p y t p 01 y = t p t q y And for the case of independent lives, in the traditional actuarial notation, we have: µ y = µ + µ y and tp y = t p t p y 9

Two Independent Lives Eample Suppose that () and (y) have independent future lifetimes with µ = 0.02, µ y = 0.03, and δ = 0.05. (a) Calculate a y. a y = 0 e δt tp 02 y dt = 0 e δt tq t p y dt = 2.50 (b) Calculate the probability that () dies before (y). q 1y = 0 tpy 00 µ 02 +t:y+t dt = tp t p y µ +t dt = 0.4 0 10

Multiple Decrement Models Another common application of multi-state model theory is in situations where a members of a population may leave due to one of several different causes. These so-called multiple decrement models can applied to various situations. These models typically have one active / alive state, where each individual begins. An individual may leave the population by transitioning to any of the eit states. We usually only model a single transition out of the active state; we either ignore or disallow transitions among the eit states. 11

Multiple Decrement Model Active Eit 1 0 1... Eit n Eit 2 2 n 12

Multiple Decrement Eample We issue a fully continuous whole life policy to (). The death benefit is $100,000, but doubles if () dies as a result of an accident. No benefit or surrender value is payable if the policyholder lapses his policy. (a) Draw an appopriate state diagram for modeling this type of policy. (b) Write an epression for the probability that this policy ever pays a benefit. (c) Write an epression for the EPV of this insurance. 13

Multiple Decrement Tables and Traditional Actuarial Notation The probabilities for multiple decrement models are traditionally epressed in multiple decrement tables, which are analogous to the mortality tables used in our alive-dead model. We again start with some cohort of l 0 people at age 0. The number of people remaining in the population at age is given by l. The number of people leaving at age due to decrement i is denoted by d (i) ; the total number leaving during this year is denoted by d (τ), where d (τ) = i d (i) Then l +1 = l d (1) d (2) d (n) = l d (τ) 14

Sample Double Decrement Table Here s an ecerpt of a table with two decrements: l d (1) d (2) 60 1000 11 10 61 979 12 10 62 957 13 10 63 934 14 10 64 910 15 10.. We can calculate that of the original 1000 members of this population, d (2) 2 = 10 of them leave due to decrement 2 in the third year, and d (τ) 3 = d (1) 3 + d (2) 3 = 24 of them leave in the fourth year for any reason... 15

Multiple Decrement Tables More Notation We denote the probability of leaving in a given year as a result of decrement i by q (i) = d (i) l and the probability of leaving due to any decrement as q (τ) = i q (i) = d (τ) l We denote the probability of surviving all decrements in a given year by p (τ) = 1 q (τ) = l +1 l 16

Multiple Decrements in Continuous Models In a continuous model, the force of failure for decrement i at age is denoted by µ (i) and the total force of failure is µ (τ) = µ (1) + µ (2) + + µ (n) The probability of failing within t years due to decrement i is: t tq (i) = 0 sp (τ) µ (i) +s ds and the probability of failing within t due to any decrement is: t tq (τ) = 0 sp (τ) µ (τ) +s ds (Note that these aren t actually new formulas; they re just epressed in different notation.) 17

Dependent and Independent Probabilities for Multiple Decrement Models In our multiple decrement table above, the d (i) the calculated q (i) the table; hence, q (i) of decrement. values (and hence values) depended on the other decrements in is sometimes called a dependent probability If we calculate the probability of someone age failing due to decrement i in the absence of other decrements, the resulting probability is called the independent probability of decrement, the probability of decrement in the associated single decrement table, or sometimes the absolute rate of decrement and is denoted by q (i). Note that t q (i) t q (i) for any, t, and i. 18

Formulas for Independent Probabilities in Multiple Decrement Models The probability of still being in the population in t years in the associated single decrement model for decrement i is denoted tp (i). tp (i) tp (i) = 1 t q (i) [ t ] = ep µ (i) +s ds 0 tp (τ) = tp (τ) n tp (i) i=1 [ t ] = ep µ (τ) +s ds 0 19

Fractional Age Assumptions in Multiple Decrement Models If we have a discrete model (i.e., a multiple decrement table), we ll often need to make some assumptions regarding how the decrements act within the year: We need this in order to get the independent failure probabilities from the dependent ones (and vice-versa). We also need this additional information to do calculations for non-integral lengths of time. 20

Fractional Age Assumptions Eample (Decrement 1 is retirement, decrement 2 is death) l d (1) d (2) 60 1000 11 10 61 979 12 10 62 957 13 10 63 934 14 10 64 910 15 10.. Eample: For the double decrement table above, calculate and interpret q (1) 62 and q (2) 62 assuming: (a) All retirements occur at the beginning of the year. (b) All retirements occur at the end of the year. (c) All retirements occur uniformly throughout the year. (Assume in all cases that deaths happen throughout the year.) 21..

Uniform Distribution of Decrements in the Multiple-Decrement Table One option is to assume that each decrement in the multiple decrement table is distributed uniformly over the year in the presence of other decrements, i.e., t q (j) is a linear function of t. Under this UDD assumption in the multiple decrement contet: tq (j) = t q (j) From this assumption, we can derive the following relationships: tq (τ) = t q (τ) tp (τ) ( tp (j) = = 1 t q (τ) 1 t q (τ) ) q (j) µ (j) +t = /q (τ) q (j) 1 t q (τ) 22

Uniform Distribution in the Associated Single-Decrement Tables Another option is to assume that each decrement is distributed uniformly in its associated single decrement table, i.e., in the absence of other decrements, so that t q (j) is a linear function of t. Under this UDD assumption in the single decrement contet: tq (j) = t q (j) From this assumption, we can derive various relationships. For eample, for a double decrement table, we have: ( q (1) = q (1) 1 1 ) ( 2 q (2) and q (2) = q (2) 1 1 ) 2 q (1) Similar equations can be derived for triple decrement tables. 23

Constant Force of Decrement Assumption We could instead assume that the forces of decrement are constant within the year. This assumption results in the following formulas: [ tp (j) = p (j) ] t [ tp (τ) = p (τ) ] t tq (j) ( = q(j) [ q (τ) 1 [ p (j) = p (τ) ] q (j) p (τ) /q (τ) ] t ) 24

Multiple Decrement Eamples I This table is from a policy which epires on first of death (1), surrender (2), or illness (3). Calculate l d (1) d (2) d (3) 40 100000 51 4784 44 41 95121 52 4526 47 42 90496 53 4268 50 43 86125 54 4010 53 44 82008 55 3753 56 45 78144 56 3496 59 46 74533 57 3239 62 47 71175 57 2983 65 48 68070 58 2729 67 49 65216 58 2476 69 50 62613 58 2226 70 (a) 3 p (τ) 45, q(1) 40, and 5q (3) 41. (b) the probability that a policy issued to (45) generates a claim for death or critical illness before age 47. (c) the probability that a policy issued to (40) is surrendered between ages 45 and 47. 25

Multiple Decrement Eamples II This table is from a policy which epires on first of death (1), surrender (2), or illness (3). Calculate l d (1) d (2) d (3) 40 100000 51 4784 44 41 95121 52 4526 47 42 90496 53 4268 50 43 86125 54 4010 53 44 82008 55 3753 56 45 78144 56 3496 59 46 74533 57 3239 62 47 71175 57 2983 65 48 68070 58 2729 67 49 65216 58 2476 69 50 62613 58 2226 70 Calculate 0.2 q (j) 50 for j = 1, 2, 3 assuming, between integer ages, (a) UDD in all decrements (b) constant transition forces in all decrements 26