A Robust Filter for the BeppoSAX Gamma Ray Burst Monitor Triggers

Similar documents
Discovery of a transient absorption edge in the X ray spectrum of GRB

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 11 Oct 2004

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 22 Jun 2005

M. FEROCI, M.-N. CINTI, E. COSTA, AND B. PREGER Istituto di AstroÐsica Spaziale/Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome, I Italy

The first X-ray localization of a γ-ray burst by BeppoSAX and its fast spectral evolution

PoS(extremesky2009)013

Comparative study of the two large flares from SGR with the BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 12 Feb 1998

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 10 Feb 2005

AGILE, a satellite for high energy Gamma Ray Astrophysics: Prospects for the MiniCalorimeter

The Palermo Swift-BAT Hard X-ray Catalogue

X-ray flashes and X-ray rich Gamma Ray Bursts

The Ulysses Supplement to the GRANAT/WATCH Catalog of. Cosmic Gamma-Ray Bursts

Detectors for 20 kev 10 MeV

E. Caroli(1), R. M. Curado da Silva(2), J.B. Stephen(1), F. Frontera(1,3), A. Pisa (3), S. Del Sordo (4)

Polarisation measurements with a CdTe pixel array detector for Laue hard X-ray focusing telescopes

1 Gamma-Ray Burst Polarimeter GAP aboard

BATSE Evidence for GRB Spectral Features

Measuring cosmological parameters with Gamma-Ray Bursts

The BeppoSAX last score in Gamma-Ray Burst astrophysics: the E p,i E iso relationship

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 4 Dec 2007

Following up Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray Bursts

The HERMES project High Energy Rapid Modular Ensamble of Satellites

Rest-frame properties of gamma-ray bursts observed by the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor

Precise Interplanetary Network Localization of a New Soft. Gamma Repeater, SGR

The high energy instrument PDS on-board the BeppoSAX X ray astronomy satellite

PoS(Extremesky 2011)009

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 25 Jan 2010

Detectors for High Resolution Gamma-ray Imaging Based on a Single CsI(Tl) Scintillator Coupled to an Array of Silicon Drift Detectors

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 28 Jun 2002

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 2 Nov 2001

PROMPT AND DELAYED EMISSION PROPERTIES OF GAMMA-RAY BURSTS OBSERVED WITH BEPPOSAX

Using Gamma Ray Bursts to Estimate Luminosity Distances. Shanel Deal

Cosmic Gamma-ray Bursts Studies with Ioffe Institute Konus Experiments

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 15 Dec 2003

Observation of GRBs and TGFs with AGILE

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.he] 26 Mar 2010

Gamma-ray Astronomy Missions, and their Use of a Global Telescope Network

arxiv:astro-ph/ Oct 2001

Preliminary results from gamma-ray observations with the CALorimeteric Electron Telescope (CALET)

Construction and Preliminary Application of the Variability Luminosity Estimator

9.1 Years of All-Sky Hard X-ray Monitoring with BATSE

Large Scale Polarization Explorer

On-Orbit Performance of the GLAST Burst Monitor

GAME: GRB and All-Sky Monitor Experiment

Neutrino induced muons

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 21 May 1997

Search for X-ray Afterglows from Gamma-Ray Bursts in the RASS

MeV Quasar Observations with the. COMPTON Gamma Ray Observatory

Very High Energy Gamma Ray Astronomy and Cosmic Ray Physics with ARGO-YBJ

NEW SOFT BATSE GRBS AND SPECTRA OF X-RAY RICH BURSTS

Cosmic Explosions. Greg Taylor (UNM ) Astro 421

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 26 Oct 2010

On The Nature of High Energy Correlations

Observations of Soft Gamma-ray Repeaters with Konus experiments

Outbursts and State Transitions in Black Hole Candidates Observed by MAXI

BeppoSAX spectrum of GRB971214: evidence of a substantial energy output during afterglow

Figure 1: Two pressure shocks causing the sample temperature increase (Termocouple Tc1, figure 1b of reference [2]). 2 Heat production Apart from the

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 31 Jan 2007

Expected and unexpected gamma-ray emission from GRBs in light of AGILE and Fermi. Marco Tavani (INAF & University of Rome Tor Vergata)

The Mini-Calorimeter detector for the AGILE mission

Results from Silicon Photo-Multiplier neutron irradiation test

INTEGRAL Cross-calibration Status: Crab observations between 3 kev and 1 MeV

The Swift GRB MIDEX. Neil Gehrels May 20, 2002

On-flight calibration of the Swift-XRT telescope

A huge explosion in the early Universe

GRB detection at ground level using Water Cerenkov Tanks

The Mini-Calorimeter for the AGILE satellite

Anatoly Petrukhin & Rostislav Kokoulin for Russian-Italian DECOR Collaboration

LAT Automated Science Processing for Gamma-Ray Bursts

Space Astronomy Facilities

GRAPE A Balloon-Borne Gamma-Ray Polarimeter

Observing Compact Galactic Sources in X- and gamma-rays with AGILE

A method for determination of gamma-ray direction in space. Serkan Akkoyun

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 28 Feb 2002

Detecting Gamma-Ray Bursts in the DC1 Data

CRaTER Science Requirements

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 5 May 2004

TAROT: A status report

Enhanced detection of Terrestrial Gamma-Ray Flashes by AGILE

The farthest GRBs similar to the closest

PAMELA: a Satellite Experiment for Antiparticles Measurement in Cosmic Rays

Search for dark matter particles in space: International experiments PAMELA and GAMMA-400

Gamma-rays of cosmic origin are a manifestation of the most energetic phenomena in our Universe. Many

Available online at ScienceDirect. Physics Procedia 74 (2015 )

Gamma Ray Physics in the Fermi era. F.Longo University of Trieste and INFN

BeppoSAX spectrum of GRB971214: evidence of a substantial energy output during afterglow

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 26 Feb 2008

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 17 May 1998

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 13 Sep 1999

Using BATSE to Measure. Gamma-Ray Burst Polarization. M. McConnell, D. Forrest, W.T. Vestrand and M. Finger y

1 Introduction STATUS OF THE GLAST LARGE AREA TELESCOPE. SLAC-PUB December Richard Dubois. Abstract

New Constraints on Simultaneous Optical Emission. From GRBs Measured by the LOTIS Experiment

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 17 Mar 1999

Physics of Short Gamma-Ray Bursts Explored by CTA and DECIGO/B-DECIGO

The Complex kev X-Ray Spectrum of PKS

GRB : an ultra-long burst discovered by the IPN

PoS(extremesky2009)018

The WBS CCDs as cosmic ray detectors. V. Ossenkopf, KOSMA

TAROT: A status report

Transcription:

Proceedings of the 5 th Huntsville Gamma-Ray Bursts Symposium (1999) A Robust Filter for the BeppoSAX Gamma Ray Burst Monitor Triggers arxiv:astro-ph/9912488v1 23 Dec 1999 M. Feroci (1) C.L. Bianco (1) F. Lazzarotto (1) A. Mattei (1) G. Ventura (1) E. Costa (1) and F. Frontera (2),(3) (1) Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale - CNR, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere, Roma, Italy (2) Istituto Tecnologie E Studio Radiazioni Estraterrestri - CNR, Via Gobetti 101, Bologna, Italy (3) Dipartimento di Fisica, Universitá di Ferrara, Via del Paradiso 12, Ferrara, Italy Abstract. The BeppoSAX Gamma Ray Burst Monitor (GRBM) is triggered any time a statistically significant counting excess is simultaneously revealed by at least two of its four independent detectors. Several spurious effects, including highly ionizing particles crossing two detectors, are recorded as onboard triggers. In fact, a large number of false triggers is detected, in the order of 10/day. A software code, based on an heuristic algorithm, was written to discriminate between real and false triggers. We present the results of the analysis on an homogeneous sample of GRBM triggers, thus providing an estimate of the efficiency of the GRB detection system consisting of the GRBM and the software. THE GAMMA RAY BURST MONITOR The GRBM [1,3,2,4] is a gamma-ray detection system onboard the BeppoSAX satellite. It is the secondary function of the anticoincidence shields of the PDS experiment. It is composed of four 1100 cm 2 slabs of CsI(Na) scintillators operating in the 40-700 kev range. Each detector provides time series of the detected counts in the above energy range, with 1 s resolution as a continuous housekeeping and with better than 8 ms resolution upon trigger. An oboard trigger is active whenever a statistically significant counting excess is simultaneously detected in at least two of the four detectors. AIMS, METHOD AND LIMITS Besides of being gamma-ray detection devices, the scintillating crystals composing the GRBM are sensitive to highly ionizing particles that, leaving a large amount of energy ( GeV) in just one shot, result in a phosphorescence phenomenon, with a consequent detectionbytheelectronicsofalargenumberofcountsinfewtensofms, i.e. a spike in the counting rate. When the same particle subsequently crosses two

detectors, it causes the onboard logic to trigger on the event, that is electronically undistinguishable from a cosmic gamma-ray transient (no particle anticoincidence is available to the GRBM). The number of spikes that trigger the onboard electronics (originating false triggers) is of the order of 9-10/day. Therefore, the aim of this work is to provide a software filter that allows to make a safe first-order discrimination of the instrumental triggers from the cosmic-origin triggers. This will allow the reduction of the huge number of onboard triggers recorded so far (of the order of 10,000 in the first three years of BeppoSAX operations), and to apply a more refined program to the generated sample of triggers. A first drawback of the roughness of our filter is that it does not include criteria to separate gamma ray bursts from solar flares and from soft gamma repeaters events. This task will be carried out by the second order filter. Our software filter is based on the automatic on-ground analysis of the high resolution time series, according to criteria established on the basis of the known detector/electronics behaviour and an extended study of the GRBM time series. Usually, an eye inspection of a GRBM light curve is sufficient to discriminate cosmic gamma-ray events from spurious events. However, when an archival search for real GRB is carried out this becomes not viable anymore, and an automatic filter is needed. We therefore set-up an IDL-based software code that implements a number of discrimination criteria to the GRBM light curves. This is a first approach to the problem and we did not make use of all the information that the GRBM provides for each onboard trigger. In fact, also 1-s resolution data are available in two energy ranges (40-700 and >700 kev) and time-averaged energy spectra but they are not used in the analysis presented here. The criteria implemented in the program are based on the knowledge of the instrument operational principles and on experience on the observed light curves. It is likely that particular cases exist that were not taken into account in our code. At this time, the following parameters of the individual events are computed for each of the four GRBM detection units: duration, rise time, simultaneity, shape, full width at half maximum. The basic criterium of the code is to assign a score to each of these parameters, based on their comparison between pairs of detectors, with the goal of having the smallest score to the most-likely-cosmic events. The individual scores for the different parameters then combine together to give a total score accounting for all the measured event characteristics. For the final score, the higher is the value the smaller is the probability of being a cosmic event. CALIBRATION OF THE FILTER In order to test and calibrate the efficiency of our software filter, we set-up a sample of selected events whose origin was known by different methods (typically BATSE or IPN events). To these a number of eye-screened false triggers were added. In Figure 1 we present the results of the analysis carried out with our filter on such a sample of events. The x-axis reports the score given to each event by the

Score Burst Spike Doubt Score <2 (83.3±5.8)% (9.6±4.5)% (7.1±4.0)% 2 Score<4 <4.5% (conf.lev. 68%) (16.0 ± 7.3)% (84.0 ± 7.3)% Score 4 (1.7±1.0)% (94.0±1.8)% (4.2±1.6)% TABLE 1. Score calibration for the software filter FIGURE 1. Efficiency diagram of the software filter: probability of true cosmic events is inversely proportional to the score value on x-axis filter. The texture classifies the events, based on the comparison with data from other satellites (BATSE, Ulysses, etc.). The sample includes several short GRBs in order to test the ability of the software to distinguish between them and spikes, but many long GRBs are also included. Thus, we can define 3 score classes (Burst, Spike, Doubt), withtheconfidences givenintable1(thesumofeveryrowis100%), computed assuming multinomial distribution. The software works on single peaks even during the evolution within a multiple-peaked event. Therefore, the results reported in the Table should be intended as applicable to individual peaks in each light curve. Examples of events belonging to these three categories are presented in Figure 2. There are 3 additional special classes in the plot: No-End, No-Class, No-Trig. No-End: the signal does not return to noise level before the end of the light curve (GRBM high time resolution data have a maximum coverage of 106 s). This can be due to long bursts, or to a variable background (see an example in [2]). No-Class: the signal has not been analyzed. This can happen for weak events if the software

is not able to estimate the duration of the signal. No-Trig: the software is unable to find other than noise in the light curve, possibly due to very weak signals. APPLICATION TO THE GRBM DATABASE The software filter has been applied to a fraction of the BeppoSAX GRBM data archive, covering more than 3 years of elapsed time, but consisting of about 603 days of satellite observing time. The goal was to test our software on an homogenous sample of onboard triggers. A noticeable by-product of this operation is an estimate of the GRB detection efficiency. As stated above, the filter operates on individual peaks. The result of the analysis gives: 440 peaks from cosmic events, 510 doubt cases, 4648spikes, 58 No End, 86 No Class. If we apply the filter efficiency that was defined in the previous section, then the number of cosmic peaks become (367±26). They belong to about 340 individual events, of which only 180 have been postfacto verified to be real cosmic events. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The results of the analysis on an unselected portion ( 40%) of the BeppoSAX/GRBM data archive presented in this paper allow to draw the following conclusions: - A number of 180 cosmic events detected by the BeppoSAX/GRBM were identified (including a small number of Solar Flares and events from Soft Gamma Repeaters), over a net exposure time of 545 days, leading to an estimation of the GRBM efficiency on triggering cosmic events of 0.33/day (additional events are detected, but without an onboard trigger). - The automatic filter has a 50% efficiency on selecting real events out of false triggers (i.e., any event selected by the program has a 50% probability of being of cosmic origin). This reduced efficiency is likely due to the incompleteness of the sample on which the code was calibrated. - The automatic filter has a >90% efficiency on descarding false triggers (i.e., any event not selected by the program has a less than 10% probability of being a real event, based on the software calibration). So, the filter allows to reduce the number of light curves to be analyzed to about 10% of the total, with an expected efficiency of more than 90%. REFERENCES 1. Frontera F. et. al. A&A Suppl. Ser., 122, 357, 1997 2. Feroci M., et. al. Proc. SPIE, 3114, 186, 1997 3. Amati L., et. al. Proc. SPIE, 3114, 176, 1997 4. Costa E., et. al. Adv. Space Res. 22, 1129, 1998

FIGURE 2. 8-ms resolution light curves in the four GRBM detectors, for a real short gamma rayburst (Top 4 panels), a spike (Middle 4 panels) and a dubious event (Bottom 4 panels). X-axis is time in seconds, Y-axis gives the counts/bin.