On products of multivalent close-to-star functions

Similar documents
Malaya J. Mat. 4(1)(2016) 37-41

On the improvement of Mocanu s conditions

QuasiHadamardProductofCertainStarlikeandConvexPValentFunctions

A Certain Subclass of Multivalent Analytic Functions Defined by Fractional Calculus Operator

Research Article Some Properties of Certain Integral Operators on New Subclasses of Analytic Functions with Complex Order

SOME CLASSES OF MEROMORPHIC MULTIVALENT FUNCTIONS WITH POSITIVE COEFFICIENTS INVOLVING CERTAIN LINEAR OPERATOR

NEW SUBCLASS OF MULTIVALENT HYPERGEOMETRIC MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS

Research Article New Mixed Exponential Sums and Their Application

Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Vol 8(57), No Series III: Mathematics, Informatics, Physics, 1-12

ON SOME LENGTH PROBLEMS FOR ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

Inclusion and argument properties for certain subclasses of multivalent functions defined by the Dziok-Srivastava operator

Coefficient inequalities for certain subclasses Of p-valent functions

Inequalities for finite trigonometric sums. An interplay: with some series related to harmonic numbers

Sufficient conditions for certain subclasses of meromorphic p-valent functions

ON CERTAIN CLASS OF UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS WITH CONIC DOMAINS INVOLVING SOKÓ L - NUNOKAWA CLASS

On differential subordinations in the complex plane

An extended Hilbert s integral inequality in the whole plane with parameters

Differential Sandwich Theorem for Multivalent Meromorphic Functions associated with the Liu-Srivastava Operator

Some applications of differential subordinations in the geometric function theory

Research Article A Note on the Modified q-bernoulli Numbers and Polynomials with Weight α

Interpolatory curl-free wavelets on bounded domains and characterization of Besov spaces

Research Article An iterative Algorithm for Hemicontractive Mappings in Banach Spaces

Research Article A New Method to Study Analytic Inequalities

GENERALIZED NORMS INEQUALITIES FOR ABSOLUTE VALUE OPERATORS

SUBCLASSES OF P-VALENT STARLIKE FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY USING CERTAIN FRACTIONAL DERIVATIVE OPERATOR

ON CERTAIN SUBCLASSES OF UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS AND RADIUS PROPERTIES

SUPPLEMENTS TO KNOWN MONOTONICITY RESULTS AND INEQUALITIES FOR THE GAMMA AND INCOMPLETE GAMMA FUNCTIONS

Research Article A New Sum Analogous to Gauss Sums and Its Fourth Power Mean

Coefficients estimates of some subclasses of analytic functions related with conic domain

Multiplicity of weak solutions for a class of nonuniformly elliptic equations of p-laplacian type

Small Zeros of Quadratic Forms Mod P m

Research Article Positive Solutions of Sturm-Liouville Boundary Value Problems in Presence of Upper and Lower Solutions

du+ z f 2(u) , which generalized the result corresponding to the class of analytic functions given by Nash.

NOTE ON RADIUS PROBLEMS FOR CERTAIN CLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS. We dedicate this paper to the 60th anniversary of Professor Y. Polatoglu.

Research Article On a New Class of p-valent Meromorphic Functions Defined in Conic Domains

Extremal Polynomials with Varying Measures

Sufficient conditions for starlike functions associated with the lemniscate of Bernoulli

Differential Subordination and Superordination Results for Certain Subclasses of Analytic Functions by the Technique of Admissible Functions

Global Behavior of a Higher Order Rational Difference Equation

On the minimax inequality and its application to existence of three solutions for elliptic equations with Dirichlet boundary condition

Differential Subordinations and Harmonic Means

On Erdős and Sárközy s sequences with Property P

Asymptotic for a Riemann-Hilbert Problem Solution 1

Some nonlinear dynamic inequalities on time scales

Research Article Controllability of Linear Discrete-Time Systems with Both Delayed States and Delayed Inputs

ON THE LEAST SIGNIFICANT p ADIC DIGITS OF CERTAIN LUCAS NUMBERS

Research Article Arc Length Inequality for a Certain Class of Analytic Functions Related to Conic Regions

Volume-Preserving Diffeomorphisms with Periodic Shadowing

A Note on Massless Quantum Free Scalar Fields. with Negative Energy Density

An Estimate For Heilbronn s Exponential Sum

ON CERTAIN CLASSES OF MULTIVALENT FUNCTIONS INVOLVING A GENERALIZED DIFFERENTIAL OPERATOR

Various Proofs for the Decrease Monotonicity of the Schatten s Power Norm, Various Families of R n Norms and Some Open Problems

On Character Sums of Binary Quadratic Forms 1 2. Mei-Chu Chang 3. Abstract. We establish character sum bounds of the form.

A new half-discrete Mulholland-type inequality with multi-parameters

Convolution Properties for Certain Meromorphically Multivalent Functions

AClassofMultivalentHarmonicFunctionsInvolvingSalageanOperator

A Certain Subclass of Multivalent Functions Involving Higher-Order Derivatives

arxiv: v1 [math.cv] 19 Jul 2012

Asymptotic behavior of sample paths for retarded stochastic differential equations without dissipativity

Received: / Revised: / Accepted:

Research Article A New Class of Meromorphic Functions Associated with Spirallike Functions

arxiv: v2 [math.cv] 24 Nov 2009

An Application of Wilf's Subordinating Factor Sequence on Certain Subclasses of Analytic Functions

On the approximation of a polytope by its dual L p -centroid bodies

Research Article Coefficient Inequalities for a Subclass of p-valent Analytic Functions

The Nemytskii operator on bounded p-variation in the mean spaces

ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS No 18/2009 SOME SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS. Firas Ghanim and Maslina Darus

ETNA Kent State University

On the Class of Functions Starlike with Respect to a Boundary Point

Abstract. We derive a sharp bound for the modulus of the Schwarzian derivative of concave univalent functions with opening angle at infinity

Harmonic Mappings for which Second Dilatation is Janowski Functions

A sharp generalization on cone b-metric space over Banach algebra

Coefficient bounds for p-valent functions

#A6 INTEGERS 15A (2015) ON REDUCIBLE AND PRIMITIVE SUBSETS OF F P, I. Katalin Gyarmati 1.

A New Criterion for Meromorphic Multivalent Starlike Functions of Order γ defined by Dziok and Srivastava Operator

Research Article A New Class of Meromorphically Analytic Functions with Applications to the Generalized Hypergeometric Functions

Coefficient bounds for some subclasses of p-valently starlike functions

Second Hankel Determinant Problem for a Certain Subclass of Univalent Functions

Old and new order of linear invariant family of harmonic mappings and the bound for Jacobian

Combinatorics of topmost discs of multi-peg Tower of Hanoi problem

RIEMANN-STIELTJES OPERATORS BETWEEN WEIGHTED BERGMAN SPACES

Global solution of reaction diffusion system with full matrix

Transpose of the Weighted Mean Matrix on Weighted Sequence Spaces

#A37 INTEGERS 15 (2015) NOTE ON A RESULT OF CHUNG ON WEIL TYPE SUMS

Some basic properties of certain subclasses of meromorphically starlike functions

On the normality of p-ary bent functions

A NEW CLASS OF MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS RELATED TO CHO-KWON-SRIVASTAVA OPERATOR. F. Ghanim and M. Darus. 1. Introduction

#A64 INTEGERS 18 (2018) APPLYING MODULAR ARITHMETIC TO DIOPHANTINE EQUATIONS

Research Article Certain Subclasses of Multivalent Functions Defined by Higher-Order Derivative

Growth and distortion theorem for the Janowski alpha-spirallike functions in the unit disc

Local Extreme Points and a Young-Type Inequality

ON JOINT CONVEXITY AND CONCAVITY OF SOME KNOWN TRACE FUNCTIONS

Necessary and sufficient conditions for boundedness of multilinear fractional integrals with rough kernels on Morrey type spaces

Inequalities for the generalized trigonometric and hyperbolic functions with two parameters

Some Unitary Space Time Codes From Sphere Packing Theory With Optimal Diversity Product of Code Size

Existence and nonexistence of positive solutions for quasilinear elliptic systems

#A8 INTEGERS 12 (2012) PARTITION OF AN INTEGER INTO DISTINCT BOUNDED PARTS, IDENTITIES AND BOUNDS

SUBCLASS OF HARMONIC STARLIKE FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH SALAGEAN DERIVATIVE

On Multivalent Functions Associated with Fixed Second Coefficient and the Principle of Subordination

Int. J. Open Problems Complex Analysis, Vol. 3, No. 1, March 2011 ISSN ; Copyright c ICSRS Publication,

Transcription:

Arif et al. Journal of Inequalities and Alications 2015, 2015:5 R E S E A R C H Oen Access On roducts of multivalent close-to-star functions Muhammad Arif 1,JacekDiok 2*,MohsanRaa 3 and Janus Sokół 4 * Corresondence: jdiok@univ.resow.l 2 Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Resów, Resów, 35-310, Poland Full list of author information is available at the end of the article Abstract In the resent aer we define a class of roducts of multivalent close-to-star functions and determine the set of airs a, r), a < r 1 a,suchthatevery function from the class mas the disk Da, r):={ : a < r} onto a domain starlike with resect to the origin. Some consequences of the obtained result are also considered. MSC: 30C45; 30C50; 30C55 Keywords: analytic functions; close-to-star functions; generalied starlikeness; radius of starlikeness 1 Introduction Let A denote the class of functions which are analytic in D = D0, 1), where Da, r)= { : a < r } and let A denote the class of functions f A of the form f )= + a n n D; N0 = {0,1,2,...} ). 1) n=+1 Afunctionf A is said to be starlike of order α in Dr):=D0, r)if f ) ) Re > α Dr); 0 α < ). f ) Afunctionf A 1 is said to be convex of order α in D if Re 1+ f ) ) > α D;0 α <1). f ) We denote by S c α) the class of all functions f A, which are convex of order α in D and by S α) wedenotetheclassofallfunctionsf A, which are starlike of order α in D. We also set S α)=s 1 0). Let H be a subclass of the class A.Wedefinethe radius of starlikeness of the class H by R { }) H)= inf su r 0, 1] : f is starlike of order 0 in Dr). f H 2015 Arif et al.; licensee Sringer. This is an Oen Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License htt://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which ermits unrestricted use, distribution, and reroduction in any medium, rovided the original work is roerly cited.

Arif et al. Journal of Inequalities and Alications 2015, 2015:5 Page 2 of 14 We denote by Pβ), 0 < β 1, the class of functions h A such that h0) = 1 and { hd) β := w C \{0} : Arg w < β π }, 2 where Arg w denote the rincial argument of the comlex number w i.e. from the interval π, π]). The class P := P1) is the well-known class of Carathéodory functions. We say that a function f A belongs to the class CS α, β) ifthereexistsafunction g S α)suchthat f g Pβ). In articular, we denote CS α)=cs α,1), CS α)=cs 1 α), CS = CS 0). The class CS is the well-known class of close-to-star functions with argument 0. Silverman [1] introduced the class of functions F given by the formula F)= n ) fj ) aj n g j ) ) b j fj S α), g j S c β)j =1,2,...,n) ), where a j, b j j =1,2,...,n) are ositive real numbers satisfying the following conditions: a j = a, b j = b. Dimkov [2] studied the class of functions F given by the formula F)= n ) fj ) aj fj S α j ), j =1,2,...,n ), where a j j =1,2,...,n) are comlex numbers satisfying the condition 1 α j ) a j a. Let, n be ositive integer and let a, m, M, N be ositive real numbers, b [ m, m]. Moreover, let a =a 1, a 2,...,a n ), α =α 1, α 2,...,α n ), β =β 1, β 2,...,β n ) be fixed vectors, with a j R, 0 α j <, 0<β j 1 j =1,2,...,n).

Arif et al. Journal of Inequalities and Alications 2015, 2015:5 Page 3 of 14 We denote by H n a, α, β)theclassoffunctionsf given by the formula F)= n ) fj ) aj fj CS α j, β j ), j =1,...,n ). 2) By G nm, b, c) we denote union of all classes Hn a, α, β)forwhich α j ) a j = m, α j ) Re a j = b, β j a j = c. 3) Finally, let us denote G n M, N):= c [0,N] b [ m,m] m [0,M] G n m, b, c). 4) It is clear that the class G n M, N) contains functions F given by the formula 2)forwhich α j ) a j M, β j a j N. Aleksandrov [3] stated andsolvedthe followingroblem. Problem 1 Let H be the class of functions f A that are univalent in D and let D be a domain starlike with resect to an inner oint ω with smooth boundary given by the formula t)=ω + rt)e it 0 t 2π). Find conditions for the function rt) suchthatforeachf H the image domain f ) is starlike with resect to f ω). Świtoniak andstankiewic [4, 5], Dimkov and Diok [6]see also[7]) have investigated a similar roblem of generalied starlikeness. Problem 2 Let H A. Determine the set B H)ofallairsa, r) D R,suchthat a < r 1 a, 5) and every function f H mas the disk Da, r) onto a domain starlike with resect to the origin. The set B H) is called the set of generalied starlikeness of the class H. We note that R H)=su { r :0,r) B H) }. 6) In this aer we determine the sets B H n a, α, β)), B G n m, b, c)) and B G n M, N)). The sets of generalied starlikeness for some subclasses of the defined classes are also considered. Moreover, we obtain the radii of starlikeness of these classes of functions.

Arif et al. Journal of Inequalities and Alications 2015, 2015:5 Page 4 of 14 2 Main results We start from listing some lemmas which will be useful later on. Lemma 1 [5] A function f A mas the disk Da, r), a < r 1 a, onto a domain starlike with resect to the origin if and only if Re eiθ f a + re iθ ) f a + re iθ ) 0 0 θ 2π). 7) For a function f S α)itiseasytoverifythat f ) f ) α α) 1+ 2 1 2 2 α) 1 2 D). Thus, after some calculations we get the following lemma. Lemma 2 Let f S α), a, θ R, D 0 := D \{0}. Then [ f Re ae iθ ) f ) )] 2 α) 1 Re ae iθ a ). 2 Lemma 3 [8] If h Pβ), then h ) h) 2β D). 1 2 Theorem 1 Let m, b, c be defined by3) and set 0 r r 1, a < r, B = a, r) C R : r 1 < r < r 2, a ϕr),, 8) r 2 r < q, a q r B = { a, r) C R : a < r q a }, 9) where r 1 = r 2 = 4m + c), 10) m + c) m + c + m + c) 2 2b + 2 ) 2, 11) q = m + c + m + c) 2 2b +, 12) 2 ϕr)= r 2 1 2 rm + c)) 2. 13) 2b 1 Moreover, set { B for b > /2, B = for b /2. B 14)

Arif et al. Journal of Inequalities and Alications 2015, 2015:5 Page 5 of 14 If a, r) B, then a function F H n a, α, β) mas the disk Da, r) onto a domain starlike with resect to the origin. The result is shar for b /2 and for b > /2 the set B cannot be larger than B. It means that B B H n a, α, β)) B b > /2), 15) B H n a, α, β)) = B b /2). 16) Proof Let F belong to the class H n a, α, β)andlet = a+reiθ D satisfy 5). The functions g j,s )=e is f j e is ) D; j =1,2,...,n, s R) belong to the class CS α j, β j ) together with the functions f j ). Thus, by 2) the functions G s )=e is F e is ) D; s R) belong to the class H n a, α, β) together with the function F). In consequence, we have a, r) B H n a, α, β)) a, r ) B H n a, α, β)) a D, r 0). 17) Therefore, without loss of generality we may assume that a is nonnegative real number. Since f j CS α j, β j ), there exist functions g j S α j)andh j Pβ j )suchthat f j ) g j ) = h j) D) or equivalently f j )=g j )h j ) D). 18) After logarithmic differentiation of the equality 2)we obtain F ) F) = + fj ) a j f j ) ) D). Thus, using 18)wehave Re eiθ F ) F) = Re eiθ Re eiθ + + g Re a j e iθ j ) g j ) )) + g Re a j e iθ j ) g j ) )) ) Re a j e iθ h j) h j ) a j h j) h j ). By Lemma 2 and Lemma 3 we obtain Re eiθ F ) F) Re eiθ + 2 1 2 2 1 2 α j )a j Re e iθ) 2 α j ) a j 1 2 a j β j.

Arif et al. Journal of Inequalities and Alications 2015, 2015:5 Page 6 of 14 Setting = a + re iθ and using 3) the above inequality yields Re eiθ F a + re iθ ) Fa + re iθ ) Re e iθ a + re iθ +2Rer + ae iθ )b m c 1 a + re iθ 2. By Lemma 1 it is sufficient to show that the right-hand side of the last inequality is nonnegative, that is, Re If we ut r + ae iθ +2Rer + ae iθ )b m c 1 r + ae iθ 2 0. 19) r + ae iθ = x + yi, then we obtain x x 2 + y +2bx m c 2 1 x 2 y 0. 2 Thus, using the equality x r) 2 + y 2 = a 2, 20) we obtain wx)=2r2b )x 2 2b ) r 2 a 2) +4rm + c) ) x +2m + c) r 2 a 2) 0. 21) The discriminant of wx)isgivenby = 2b ) r 2 a 2) +4rm + c) ) 2 16r2b )m + c) r 2 a 2) = A 1 A 2, 22) where A 1 = 2b) r 2 a 2) + +4rm + c)+4 rm + c), 23) A 2 = 2b) r 2 a 2) + +4rm + c) 4 rm + c). 24) Let D = { a, r) R 2 :0 a < r 1 a }. 25) First, we discuss the case b > /2. Thus, the inequality 21) issatisfiedforeveryx [r a, r + a] if one of the following conditions is fulfilled: 1 0, 2 >0, wr a) 0 and x 0 r a, 3 >0, wr + a) 0 and x 0 r + a,

Arif et al. Journal of Inequalities and Alications 2015, 2015:5 Page 7 of 14 where x 0 = 2b )r2 a 2 )+4rm + c). 26) 42b )r Ad 1.SinceA 1 >0,by22), the condition 0 is equivalent to the inequality A 2 0. Then B 1 := { a, r) D : 0 } = { a, r) D : A 2 0 } = { a, r) D : a ϕr) }, where ϕ is defined by 13). Let γ = { a, r) D : a = ϕr) }. Then γ is the curve which is tangent to the straight lines a = r and a = q r at the oints S 1 =r 1, r 1 ) and S 2 =q r 2, r 2 ), 27) where r 1, r 2, q are defined by 10), 11), 12), resectively. Moreover, γ cuts the straight line a =0attheoints r 3 = m + c + 2b )+ m + c ) 2, r 4 = m + c 2b )+ m + c ) 2. Since 0<r 3 < r 1 < r 2 < r 4 < q, we have γ = { a, r) R 2 : r 3 r r 4, a = ϕr) }, and consequently B 1 = { a, r) R 2 : r 3 r r 4,0 a ϕr) }, 28) where ϕ is defined by 13)seeFigure1). Ad 2.Let B 2 := { a, r) D : >0 wr a) 0 x 0 r a }. It is easy to verify that wr a)=r a) 2b 1)r a) 2 2m + c)r a)+1 ) =2b 1)r a) r a q ) r a q),

Arif et al. Journal of Inequalities and Alications 2015, 2015:5 Page 8 of 14 Figure 1 The set B 1. where q is defined by 12)and q = m + c m + c) 2 2b + 2) 1. 29) Since 0<q <1<q /2 < b m,a, r) D ), 30) we see that r a) r a q ) <0 a, r) D ). Thus, the inequality wr a) 0istrueifa r q. Theinequalityx 0 r a may be written in the form 2b )a 2 +32b )r 2 4m + c)r 42b )ar + 0. 31) The hyerbola h 1, which is the boundary of the set of all airs a, r) R 2 satisfying 31), cuts the boundary of the set D at the oint S 1 defined by 27)andattheointr 5,0),where r 5 = 2m + c)+ 4m + c) 2 32b ) ) 1. 32) It is easy to verify that r 3 < r 5 < r 4 < q. Thus we determine the set B 2 = { a, r) R 2 : { }} 0 r r 3,0 a < r,, 33) r 3 < r < r 1, ϕr)<a < r where ϕ is defined by 13)seeFigure2).

Arif et al. Journal of Inequalities and Alications 2015, 2015:5 Page 9 of 14 Figure 2 The sets B 2 and B 3. Ad 3.Let B 3 := { a, r) D : >0 wr + a) 0 x 0 r + a } and let q and q be defined by 12)and29), resectively. Then wa + r)=r + a) [ 2b )r + a) 2 2m + c)r + a)+ ] =2b )r + a) r + a q ) r + a q). Moreover, by 30) wehave r + a) r + a q ) <0 a, r) D ). Thus, we conclude that the inequality wr + a) 0istrueifa q r. Theinequality x 0 r + a may be written in the form 2b )a 2 +32b )r 2 4m + c)r +42b )ar + 0. 34) The hyerbola h 2, which is the boundary of the set of all airs a, r) R 2 satisfying 34), cuts the boundary of the set D at the oint S 2 defined by 27)andattheointr 5,0),where r 5 is defined by 32). Thus, we describe the set { { }} B 3 = a, r) R 2 r 2 < r < r 4, ϕr)<a q r, :, 35) r 4 < r < q,0 a q r where ϕ is defined by 13)seeFigure2). The union of the sets B 1, B 2, B 3 defined by 28), 33), and 35)givestheset 0 r r 1,0 a < r, B = a, r) R2 : r 1 < r < r 2,0 a ϕr),. r 2 r < q,0 a q r

Arif et al. Journal of Inequalities and Alications 2015, 2015:5 Page 10 of 14 Thus, by 17)wehave B B H n a, α, β)) b > /2), 36) where B is defined by 8). Now, let b < /2. Then the inequality 21)issatisfiedforeveryx [r a, r + a]if wr a) 0 and wr + a) 0. 37) We see that wa + r)=2b )r + a) r + a q ) r + a q), wr a)=2b )r a) r a q ) r a q), where q and q are defined by 12)and29), resectively. Since q <0<q <1 b < /2), the condition 37)issatisfiedifa, r) D and a q r. 38) Let b = 1/2. Then by 21)weobtain 4rm + c) ) x +2m + c) r 2 a 2) 0. The above inequality holds for every x [r a, r + a]ifa, r) D and r a 2m + c) or equivalently 38). Thus, by 17)wehave B B H n a, α, β)) b /2), 39) where B is defined by 9). Because the function F)= n 1 1 1 + sgna j )) 2 α) ) 1 βj sgna j )) aj D) 40) 1+ belongs to the class H n a, α, β), and for = a + r, θ =0,a + r > q we have Re eiθ F ) F) Lemma 1 yields = 2 2m + c)a + r)+2b )a + r) <0. a + r)1 a + r) 2 ) B H n a, α, β)) B. 41)

Arif et al. Journal of Inequalities and Alications 2015, 2015:5 Page 11 of 14 From 36) and41) wehave15), while 39) and41) give16), which comletes the roof. Since the set B defined by 14) is deendent only of m, b, c, the following result is an immediate consequence of Theorem 1. Theorem 2 Let B be defined by 14). If a, r) B, then a function F G n m, b, c) mas the disk Da, r) onto a domain starlike with resect to the origin. The obtained result is shar for b /2 and for b > /2 the set B cannot be larger than B, where B is defined by 8). It means that B B G n m, b, c)) B B G n m, b, c)) = B b /2). b > /2), The functions described by 40),with 3) are the extremal functions. Theorem 3 B G n M, N) ) = { a, r) C R : a < r q 1 a }, 42) where q 1 = M + N + M + N) 2 +2M + 2. The equality in 42) is realied by the function F of the form 1 )2M+N F)= D). 43) 1 + ) N Proof Let M, N be ositive real numbers and let B = B m, b, c), B = B m, b, c), q = qm, b, c) andϕr) =ϕr; m, b, c) bedefinedby8), 9), 12), and 13), resectively. It is easy to verify that ϕr; m, b, c) qm, /2, c) r 1/ 2qm, /2, c) ) r qm, /2, c), /2 < b m ). Moreover, the function q = qm, b, c) is decreasing with resect to m and c, and increasing with resect to b.thus,fromtheorems1 and 2 we have see Figure 3) B G n m, /2, c) ) = B m, /2, c) B m, b, c) B G n m, b, c) ) m [0, M], c [0, N], b /2, m]) and B G n M, M, N) ) B G n m, b, c) ) B G n m, /2, c) ) m [0, M], c [0, N], b [ m, /2] ). Therefore, by 4) weobtain B G n M, N) ) = B G n M, M, N) ) 44)

Arif et al. Journal of Inequalities and Alications 2015, 2015:5 Page 12 of 14 Figure 3 The sets B and B. and by Theorem 2 we get 42). Putting m = M, b = M in 3)weseethata 1, a 2,...,a n are negative real numbers. Thus, the extremal function 40) hasthe form F)= or equivalently n 1 1 ) 21 α j) ) 1+ βj ) aj D) 1 ) 1+ n β j a j F)= 1 ) 2 n 1 α j ) a j 1 D). Consequently, using 3)weobtain F)= ) 1+ N D), 1 ) 2M 1 that is, we have the function 43) and the roof is comleted. Since H a1), α), β)) = CS α, β), by Theorem 1 we obtain the following theorem. Theorem 4 Let 0 α <,0<β 1, and 0 r r 1, a < r, B = a, r) C R : r 1 < r < r 2, a ϕr),, r 2 r < q, a q r B = { a, r) C R : a < r q a }, where r 1 = r 2 = 1 4β α + ), β + α) β + α + β α) 2 +2β) 2,

Arif et al. Journal of Inequalities and Alications 2015, 2015:5 Page 13 of 14 q = β + α + β α) 2 +2β, ϕr)= r 2 1 2 rβ α + )) 2. 2 2α 1 Moreover, let us ut { B for α < /2, B = for α /2. B If a, r) B, then the function f CS α, β) mas the disk Da, r) onto a domain starlike with resect to the origin. The obtained result is shar for α /2 and for α < /2 the set B cannot be larger then B. It means that B B CS α)) B α < /2), B CS α)) = B α /2). The function F of the form F)= 1 + ) β D) 1 ) 2 2α+β is the extremal function. Using 6)andTheorems1-4, we obtain the radii of starlikeness for the classes H n a, α, β), G nm, b, c), Gn M, N), CS α, β). Corollary 1 TheradiusofstarlikenessoftheclassesG nm, b, c) and Hn a, α, β) is given by R G n m, b, c)) = R H n a, α, β)) = m + c + m + c) 2 2b + 2. Corollary 2 TheradiusofstarlikenessoftheclassG n M, N) is given by R G n M, N)) = M + N + M + N) 2 +2M + 2. Corollary 3 TheradiusofstarlikenessoftheclassCS α, β) is given by R CS α, β)) = β + α + β α) 2 +2β. Remark 1 Putting β =1inCorollary3 we get the radius of starlikeness of the class CS α)=cs α, 1) obtained by Diok [7]. Putting = β = 1 we get the radius of starlikeness of the class CS α)=cs 1 α, 1) obtained by Ratti [9]. Putting, moreover, α =0weget the radius of starlikeness of the class CS = CS 1 0, 1) obtained by MacGregor [10]. Cometing interests The authors declare that they have no cometing interests.

Arif et al. Journal of Inequalities and Alications 2015, 2015:5 Page 14 of 14 Authors contributions All authors jointly worked on the results and they read and aroved the final manuscrit. Author details 1 Deartment of Mathematics, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan. 2 Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Resów, Resów, 35-310, Poland. 3 Deartment of Mathematics, GC University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan. 4 Deartment of Mathematics, Resów University of Technology, Resów, 35-959, Poland. Acknowledgements This work is artially suorted by the Centre for Innovation and Transfer of Natural Sciences and Engineering Knowledge, University of Resów. Received: 11 October 2014 Acceted: 3 December 2014 Published: 06 Jan 2015 References 1. Silverman, H: Products of starlike and convex functions. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sect. A 29, 109-116 1975) 2. Dimkov, G: On roducts of starlike functions. I. Ann. Pol. Math. 55, 75-79 1991) 3. Aleksandrov, IA: On the star-shaed character of the maings of a domain by functions regular and univalent in the circle. Iv.Vysš.Učebn. Zaved., Mat. 411),9-15 1959) 4. Stankiewic, J, Świtoniak, B: Generalied roblems of convexity and starlikeness. In: Comlex Analysis and Alications 85 Varna, 1985),. 670-675. Publ. House Bulgar. Acad. Sci., Sofia 1986) 5. Świtoniak, B: On a starlikeness roblem in the class of functions S α. Folia Sci. Univ. Tech. Resov. 14, 17-27 1984) 6. Dimkov, G, Diok, J: Generalied roblem of starlikeness for roducts of -valent starlike functions. Serdica Math. J. 24, 339-344 1998) 7. Diok, J: Generalied roblem of starlikeness for roducts of close-to-star functions. Ann. Pol. Math. 107, 109-121 2013) 8. Nunokawa, M, Causey, WM: On certain analytic functions bounded argument. Sci. Re. Fac. Educ., Gunma Univ. 34, 1-3 1985) 9. Ratti, JS: The radius of univalence of certain analytic functions. Math. Z. 107, 241-248 1968) 10. MacGregor, TH: The radius of univalence of certain analytic functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 14, 514-520 1963) 10.1186/1029-242X-2015-5 Cite this article as: Arif et al.: On roducts of multivalent close-to-star functions. Journal of Inequalities and Alications 2015, 2015:5