EUROPEAN ORGANIZAION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH COMPASS CERN-PH-EP-215-XXX Setember 14, 215 Longituinal ouble sin asymmetries in single aron quasi-real otorouction at ig arxiv:159.3526v1 [e-ex] 11 Se 215 e COMPASS Collaboration Abstract We measure te longituinal ouble sin asymmetries for single aron muo-rouction off rotons an euterons at oton virtuality Q 2 < 1 2 for transverse aron momenta in te range.7 GeV/c to 4 GeV/c. ey were etermine using COMPASS ata taken wit a olarise muon beam of 16 GeV/c or 2 GeV/c iminging on olarise 6 LiD or NH 3 targets. e exerimental asymmetries are comare to next-to-leaing orer QCD calculations, an are sensitive to te gluon olarisation G insie te nucleon in te range of te nucleon momentum fraction carrie by gluons.5 < x g <.2. key wors: COMPASS, Dee inelastic scattering, Double sin asymmetry, ig, G (o be Submitte to Pysics Letters B)
Longituinal ouble sin asymmetries in single... 1 e COMPASS Collaboration C. Aol 9, R. Akunzyanov 8, M.G. Alexeev 28, G.D. Alexeev 8, A. Amoroso 28,29, V. Anrieux 22, V. Anosov 8, W. Augustyniak 31, A. Austregesilo 17, C.D.R. Azeveo 2, B. Baełek 32, F. Balestra 28,29, J. Bart 5, R. Beck 4, Y. Befer 22,11, J. Bernar 14,11, K. Bicker 17,11, E. R. Bielert 11, R. Birsa 26, J. Bislingoff 4, M. Bolak 19, M. Boer 22, P. Boralo 13,a, F. Braamante 25,26, C. Braun 9, A. Bressan 25,26, M. Bücele 1, E. Burtin 22, W.-C. Cang 23, M. Ciosso 28,29, I. Coi 3, S.U. Cung 17,b, A. Cicuttin 27,26, M.L. Creso 27,26, Q. Curiel 22, S. Dalla orre 26, S.S. Dasguta 7, S. Dasguta 25,26, O.Yu. Denisov 29, L. Dara 7, S.V. Donskov 21, N. Dosita 34, V. Duic 25, W. Dünnweber c, M. Dziewiecki 33, A. Efremov 8, P.D. Everseim 4, W. Eyric 9, M. Faessler c, A. Ferrero 22, M. Finger 19, M. Finger jr. 19, H. Fiscer 1, C. Franco 13, N. u Fresne von Hoenesce 14, J.M. Frieric 17, V. Frolov 8,11, E. Fucey 22, F. Gauteron 3, O.P. Gavrictcouk 8, S. Gerassimov 16,17, F. Giorano 3, I. Gnesi 28,29, M. Gorzellik 1, S. Grabmüller 17, A. Grasso 28,29, M. Grosse Perekam 3, B. Grube 17,. Grussenmeyer 1, A. Guskov 8, F. Haas 17, D. Hane 5, D. von Harrac 14, R. Hasimoto 34, F.H. Heinsius 1, F. Herrmann 1, F. Hinterberger 4, N. Horikawa 18,, N. Hose 22, C.-Y. Hsie 23, S. Huber 17, S. Isimoto 34,e, A. Ivanov 8, Yu. Ivansin 8,. Iwata 34, R. Jan 4, V. Jary 2, R. Joosten 4, P. Jörg 1, E. Kabuß 14, B. Ketzer 17,f, G.V. Kaustov 21, Yu.A. Koklov 21,g,i, Yu. Kisselev 8, F. Klein 5, K. Klimaszewski 31, J.H. Koivuniemi 3, V.N. Kolosov 21, K. Kono 34, K. Königsmann 1, I. Konorov 16,17, V.F. Konstantinov 21, A.M. Kotzinian 28,29, O. Kouznetsov 8, M. Krämer 17, P. Kremser 1, F. Krinner 17, Z.V. Kroumctein 8, N. Kucinski 8, R. Kun 17,, F. Kunne 22, K. Kurek 31, R.P. Kurjata 33, A.A. Lenev 21, A. Lemann 9, M. Levillain 22, S. Levorato 26, J. Lictenstat 24, R. Longo 28,29, A. Maggiora 29, A. Magnon 22, N. Makins 3, N. Makke 25,26, G.K. Mallot 11, C. Marcan 22, B. Marianski 31, A. Martin 25,26, J. Marzec 33, J. Matoušek 19, H. Matsua 34,. Matsua 15, G. Mesceryakov 8, W. Meyer 3,. Micigami 34, Yu.V. Mikailov 21, Y. Miyaci 34, P. Montuenga 3, A. Nagaytsev 8, F. Nerling 14, D. Neyret 22, V.I. Nikolaenko 21, J. Nový 2,11, W.-D. Nowak 1, G. Nukazuka 34, A.S. Nunes 13, A.G. Olsevsky 8, I. Orlov 8, M. Ostrick 14, D. Panzieri 1,29, B. Parsamyan 28,29, S. Paul 17, J.-C. Peng 3, F. Pereira 2, M. Pešek 19, D.V. Pesekonov 8, S. Platckov 22, J. Pocozalla 14, V.A. Polyakov 21, J. Pretz 5,j, M. Quaresma 13, C. Quintans 13, S. Ramos 13,a, C. Regali 1, G. Reicerz 3, C. Riel 3, N.S. Rossiyskaya 8, D.I. Ryabcikov 21,i, A. Rycter 33, V.D. Samoylenko 21, A. Sanacz 31, C. Santos 26, S. Sarkar 7, I.A. Savin 8, G. Sbrizzai 25,26, P. Sciavon 25,26, K. Scmit 1,l, H. Scmieen 5, K. Scönning 11,k, S. Scoferer 1, A. Selyunin 8, O.Yu. Sevcenko 8,*, L. Silva 13, L. Sina 7, S. Sirtl 1, M. Slunecka 8, F. Sozzi 26, A. Srnka 6, M. Stolarski 13, M. Sulc 12, H. Suzuki 34,, A. Szabelski 31,. Szameitat 1,l, P. Sznajer 31, S. akekawa 28,29, S. essaro 26, F. essarotto 26, F. ibau 22, F. osello 29, V. skay 16, S. Ul 17, J. Veloso 2, M. Virius 2,. Weisrock 14, M. Wilfert 14, J. ter Wolbeek 1,l, K. Zaremba 33, M. Zavertyaev 16, E. Zemlyanickina 8, M. Ziembicki 33 an A. Zink 9 1.University of Eastern Piemont, 151 Alessanria, Italy 2.University of Aveiro, Deartment of Pysics, 381-193 Aveiro, Portugal 3.Universität Bocum, Institut für Exerimentalysik, 4478 Bocum, Germany mn 4.Universität Bonn, Helmoltz-Institut für Stralen- un Kernysik, 53115 Bonn, Germany m 5.Universität Bonn, Pysikalisces Institut, 53115 Bonn, Germany m 6.Institute of Scientific Instruments, AS CR, 61264 Brno, Czec Reublic o 7.Matrivani Institute of Exerimental Researc & Eucation, Calcutta-7 3, Inia 8.Joint Institute for Nuclear Researc, 14198 Dubna, Moscow region, Russia q 9.Universität Erlangen Nürnberg, Pysikalisces Institut, 9154 Erlangen, Germany m 1.Universität Freiburg, Pysikalisces Institut, 7914 Freiburg, Germany mn 11.CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerlan 12.ecnical University in Liberec, 46117 Liberec, Czec Reublic o 13.LIP, 1-149 Lisbon, Portugal r 14.Universität Mainz, Institut für Kernysik, 5599 Mainz, Germany m
2 e COMPASS Collaboration 15.University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki 889-2192, Jaan s 16.Lebeev Pysical Institute, 119991 Moscow, Russia 17.ecnisce Universität Müncen, Pysik Deartment, 85748 Garcing, Germany mc 18.Nagoya University, 464 Nagoya, Jaan s 19.Carles University in Prague, Faculty of Matematics an Pysics, 18 Prague, Czec Reublic o 2.Czec ecnical University in Prague, 16636 Prague, Czec Reublic o 21.State Scientific Center Institute for Hig Energy Pysics of National Researc Center Kurcatov Institute, 142281 Protvino, Russia 22.CEA IRFU/SPN Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France n 23.Acaemia Sinica, Institute of Pysics, aiei, 11529 aiwan 24.el Aviv University, Scool of Pysics an Astronomy, 69978 el Aviv, Israel t 25.University of rieste, Deartment of Pysics, 34127 rieste, Italy 26.rieste Section of INFN, 34127 rieste, Italy 27.Abus Salam ICP, 34151 rieste, Italy 28.University of urin, Deartment of Pysics, 1125 urin, Italy 29.orino Section of INFN, 1125 urin, Italy 3.University of Illinois at Urbana-Camaign, Deartment of Pysics, Urbana, IL 6181-38, U.S.A. 31.National Centre for Nuclear Researc, -681 Warsaw, Polan u 32.University of Warsaw, Faculty of Pysics, 2-93 Warsaw, Polan u 33.Warsaw University of ecnology, Institute of Raioelectronics, -665 Warsaw, Polan u 34.Yamagata University, Yamagata, 992-851 Jaan s * Decease a.also at Instituto Suerior écnico, Universiae e Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal b.also at Deartment of Pysics, Pusan National University, Busan 69-735, Reublic of Korea an at Pysics Deartment, Brookaven National Laboratory, Uton, NY 11973, U.S.A. c.suorte by te DFG cluster of excellence Origin an Structure of te Universe (www.universecluster.e).also at Cubu University, Kasugai, Aici, 487-851 Jaan s e.also at KEK, 1-1 Oo, sukuba, Ibaraki, 35-81 Jaan f.present aress: Universität Bonn, Helmoltz-Institut für Stralen- un Kernysik, 53115 Bonn, Germany g.also at Moscow Institute of Pysics an ecnology, Moscow Region, 1417, Russia.Present aress: yesafe AB, Dag Hammarskjöls väg 13, 752 37 Usala, Sween i.suorte by Presiential grant NS - 999.214.2 j.present aress: RWH Aacen University, III. Pysikalisces Institut, 5256 Aacen, Germany k.present aress: Usala University, Box 516, SE-7512 Usala, Sween l.suorte by te DFG Researc raining Grou Programme 112 Pysics at Haron Accelerators m.suorte by te German Bunesministerium für Bilung un Forscung n.suorte by EU FP7 (HaronPysics3, Grant Agreement number 283286) o.suorte by Czec Reublic MEYS Grant LG1331.Suorte by SAIL (CSR), Govt. of Inia q.suorte by CERN-RFBR Grant 12-2-915 r.suorte by te Portuguese FC - Funação ara a Ciência e ecnologia, COMPEE an QREN, Grants CERN/FP 19323/29, 116376/21, 1236/211 an CERN/FIS-NUC/17/215 s.suorte by te MEX an te JSPS uner te Grants No.1826, No.254299 an No.1854281; Daiko Founation an Yamaa Founation t.suorte by te Israel Acaemy of Sciences an Humanities u.suorte by te Polis NCN Grant DEC-211/1/M/S2/235
Longituinal ouble sin asymmetries in single... 3 1 Introuction e sin structure of te nucleon is one of te major unresolve issues in aronic ysics. Wile te quark sin contribution to te nucleon sin, enote as Σ, as been measure to be about 3% [1], te gluon sin contribution is still insufficiently constraine after more tan two ecaes of intense stuy. In te framework of erturbative Quantum Cromoynamics (QCD), inclusive Dee Inelastic Scattering (DIS) is sensitive to gluon contributions only troug iger-orer corrections to te cross section. e sin-average gluon ensity g(x g ), were x g enotes te nucleon momentum fraction carrie by gluons, is well constraine by DIS exeriments wit unolarise beam an target because of teir ig statistics an large kinematic coverage. e fewer ata from DIS exeriments wit olarise beam an target, owever, can not sufficiently constrain te gluon elicity istribution g(x g ). is affects irectly our knowlege of te contribution of te gluon sin to te sin of te nucleon, known as G = g(x g )x g, an to a lesser extent tat of te quarks [2]. In orer to better constrain g(x g ), one as to resort to rocesses were contributions from gluons aear at leaing orer. is is te case for letorouction of arons at ig transverse momenta in te limit of collinear fragmentation. Here, transverse means transverse wit resect to te irection of te virtual oton γ tat is excange in te scattering rocess. e COMPASS collaboration as alreay investigate asymmetries of arons leaing in, in bot te DIS an te quasi-real otorouction regimes [3, 4]. In general, a leaing-aron cross section is not efine in QCD [5], an terefore a moel is neee to interret te results. Using a Lun Monte Carlo simulation, tese measurements were interrete on te aron level, tereby simultaneously extracting te gluon elicity on te arton level. Suc an analysis is restricte to leaing orer (LO) in te strong couling constant α s, as resently tere exists no next-to-leaing orer (NLO) Monte Carlo simulation for letorouction. Due to te limitation of neglecting gluon contributions at NLO, suc results can not be use in recent global fits at NLO of olarise Parton Distribution Functions (PDFs) [6]. In tis Letter, we resent a new analysis of COMPASS ata for single-inclusive aron quasi-real otorouction at ig 1, wic iffers from our revious analysis in tat all measure arons are inclue in te analysis, an not only tose leaing in. e interretation is base on a collinear QCD framework tat was eveloe u to NLO [5], te basic concet being te alication of te factorisation teorem to calculate te cross section of single-inclusive aron rouction. e autors of Ref. [5] iscuss te sensitivity of COMPASS ata to g(x g ) in terms of contributions from irectoton, γ g q q (Poton Gluon Fusion), an from resolve-oton subrocesses, qg an gg, were te oton acts as a source of artons. Similarly, tey consier irect γ q q qg (QCD Comton) as well as resolve qq an gq subrocesses for te backgroun. ese contributions to te cross section are reresente scematically in Fig. 1. In te framework of collinear fragmentation, oto-absortion on quarks, γ q q, is not contributing to ig aron rouction. 1 Note tat also inclusive quasi-real otorouction of aron airs can be consiere [7].
4 e COMPASS Collaboration µ µ µ µ γ γ a b ˆσ c D c f γ a b a ˆσ c D c N f N b X N f N b X Fig. 1: Contributions to te single-inclusive cross section for quasi-real otorouction of a aron into irect (left) an resolve (rigt) subrocesses accoring to Ref. [5]. e internal lines reresent te oton γ an artons {a,b,c} = {q, q,g}. e central blob escribes te ar scattering cross section ˆσ. e erieral blobs escribe te non-erturbative objects: arton istributions of te nucleon, fb N γ, an of te oton, fa, an te fragmentation functions of te rouce aron, D c. In orer to gain confience in te alicability of tis QCD framework to single-aron rouction wit longituinally olarise beam an target, an imortant ste is to comare reictions of tis moel to measurements wit beam an target unolarise, for wic te PDFs are well known. Wile goo agreement was foun by RHIC exeriments on te rouction of ig- arons in collisions at s 2 GeV [8, 9], comlications arise wen ar scattering subrocesses are robe in te tresol regime, in wic large logaritmic contributions from soft an collinear gluons lay a significant role [1]. Suc contributions become ominant at te COMPASS centre of mass energy of s 18 GeV. Wen taken into account by a tecnique known as tresol resummation at next-to-leaing logaritm (NNL) [1], te calculations rerouce te COMPASS cross section measurements [11] witin teoretical uncertainties. In tis Letter, we analyse te quasi-real otorouction ata collecte by COMPASS from 22 to 211 on longituinally olarise euteron an roton targets. In Sec. 2, we give a brief escrition of te exerimental setu, an etails on te ata selection can be foun in Sec. 3. e roceure for te asymmetry etermination is escribe in Sec. 4. In Sec. 5, we resent te corresoning ouble sin asymmetries for single-inclusive aron rouction as a function of. ese asymmetries are comare to calculations tat were erforme using te coe of Ref. [5], wic oes not inclue te resummation of tresol logaritms. 2 Exerimental Setu e measurements were erforme wit te COMPASS setu using ositive muons from te M2 beam line of te CERN SPS. A etaile escrition of te exerimental setu can be foun in Ref. [12], wit uates vali since 26 escribe in Ref. [13]. e muon beam a a nominal momentum of 16 GeV/c, excet for 211 were te momentum was 2 GeV/c. On average, its momentum srea was 5% an its olarization was P b.8. Momentum an trajectory of incient muons were measure by a set of scintillator ooscoes, scintillating fibre an silicon microstri etectors. e beam was scattere off a soli state euterate litium ( 6 LiD) target from 22 to 26 an off an ammonia (NH 3 ) target in 27 an 211, roviing longituinally olarise euterons an rotons, resectively. e target material was lace insie a large aerture suerconucting solenoi, an by ynamic nuclear olarisation it was olarise to a value of P t.5 for 6 LiD an P t.85 for NH 3. Until 24, te target material was containe in two contiguous 6 cm long cells tat were oositely olarise. From
Longituinal ouble sin asymmetries in single... 5 26 onwars, tree contiguous target cells of lengt 3cm, 6cm an 3cm were use to minimise systematics effects, wit te olarisation in te outer cells being oosite to tat in te central one. e irection of te target olarisation was regularly flie by reversing te solenoi fiel to comensate for accetance ifferences between te ifferent target cells. At least once er year, te irection of te olarisation was reverse relative to tat of te solenoi fiel. e ilution factor f, wic accounts for te resence of unolarisable material, amounts to tyically.4 for te euterate litium target an to.16 for te ammonia one. It is calculate as te ratio of te cross section on olarisable euteron or roton to tat on all target nuclei, correcte for unolarise x an y eenent electromagnetic raiative effects [14], were x is te Bjorken scaling variable an y te relative muon energy transfer. No furter raiative effects are taken into account. e momenta an angles of scattere muons an rouce arons were measure in te two-stage oen forwar sectrometer, were eac stage inclues a iole magnet wit ustream an ownstream tracking etectors. 3 Data Selection In orer to be selecte, an event must ave an interaction vertex tat contains bot incoming an scattere muons an at least one aron caniate track. e measure beam momentum is require to be in a ±2 GeV interval aroun te nominal value (±15 GeV in 211). In orer to equalise te flux troug eac target cell, te extraolate beam track is require to ass all target cells. Cuts on te osition of te vertex allow te selection of te target cell, in wic te scattering occurre. Only events wit oton virtuality Q 2 < 1 2 are accete. is kinematic region is referre to in te following as quasi-real otorouction region. In aition, y is require to be witin.1 an.9, were te lower limit removes events tat are ifficult to reconstruct an te uer limit removes te region were electromagnetic raiative effects are large. ese kinematic cuts result in a range of 1 5 < x <.2 an a minimum mass square of te aronic final state, W 2, of 25 (GeV/c 2 ) 2. e aron caniate track must ave >.7 GeV/c. e fraction z of te virtual oton energy carrie by te aron is require to be in te range.2 < z <.8, were te lower limit is imose to suress te contribution from target remnant aronisation an te uer limit to reject baly reconstructe arons. e angle between te irection of te aron an tat of te virtual oton is restricte to be in te range 1mra < θ < 12mra, wic corresons to 2.4 > η >.1, were η is te seuo-raiity in te γ N centre-ofmass system. After all selections, te final samle consists of 14 million events for te euteron target an 15 million for te roton target. 4 Asymmetry Calculation e ouble-sin asymmetry of te cross sections for single aron quasi-real otorouction is efine as = (σ σ )/(σ + σ ) = σ/σ, were te symbols an enote anti-arallel an arallel sin irections, resectively, of te incient muon an te target euteron or roton. is asymmetry is evaluate using te same meto as in our revious analyses [4]. e number of arons rouce in a target cell is relate to an to te sin ineenent cross section σ = σ + σ : N i = a i φ i n i σ(1 + f i P b P ti ), were i = u 1, 1,u 2, 2. A target cell (u or ) wit a given irection of te target olarisation (1 or 2) as te accetance a i, te incoming muon flux φ i an te number of target nucleons n i. For te two-cell target, u an enotes ustream an ownstream cell, resectively, wile for te tree-cell target, u enotes te sum of te outer cells an te central cell. e asymmetry is extracte from te secon orer equation tat is obtaine from te quantity (N u1 N 2 )/(N 1 N u2 ). In tis relation, fluxes an accetances cancel, rovie tat te ratio of accetances of te two sets of cells is equal for te two orientations of te solenoi fiel. In orer to minimise statistical uncertainties, all quantities entering te asymmetry are calculate for eac aron using a weigt factor w i = f i P b [15]. e muon beam olarisation P b is obtaine from a
6 e COMPASS Collaboration arametrisation as a function of te beam momentum. e target olarisation P ti is not inclue in te weigt w i as it canges wit time an coul generate false asymmetries. In orer to reuce systematic uncertainties, ata are groue into erios tat are close in time an ence ave te same etector conitions, an te weigte average over all erios is taken. e asymmetries etermine for a given target from ata taken in ifferent years were foun to be consistent an ence combine. e asymmetries are obtaine for bot ositive an negative unientifie arons in bins of in te range.7 GeV/c to 4 GeV/c an in bins of η in te range.1 to 2.4 in orer to facilitate a etaile comarison to teory (see Sec. 5). e ata for < 1. GeV/c are only use to investigate systematic uncertainties as te QCD framework is commonly alie only for ar scales µ 2 2 1.2. e systematic uncertainties on are calculate as te square root of te sum of squares of multilicative an aitive contributions. e uncertainties on te ilution factor ( 5%), te beam ( 5%) an te target ( 5%) olarisations contribute to a total of 8% of multilicative uncertainties, i.e. tose being roortional to te asymmetry itself. Aitive contributions originate from fluctuations of te etector erformance, wic may lea to false asymmetries. eir ossible occurrence is investigate by iviing te ata samle into ifferent subsets. Asymmetries calculate wit arons etecte in left an rigt (to an bottom) arts of te sectrometers are foun to be comatible witin statistical uncertainties, as well as tose for te two relative orientations of te solenoi fiel an te target sin vectors. No systematic uncertainty is tus attribute to tese effects. Possible false asymmetries between ata sets aving te same olarisation states are also foun to be comatible wit zero. For eac bin, te statistical istribution of te asymmetries calculate by time erios closely follows a normal istribution. e observe eviations from a Gaussian allow us to quantify te level of overall aitive systematic uncertainties as a fraction of te statistical ones, wic on average amounts to about one alf. ese aitive systematic uncertainties largely ominate over te multilicative ones. 5 Results an interretation e final asymmetries are calculate using all ata accumulate wit te euteron target in te years 22 to 26 an wit te roton target in te years 27 an 211. eir -eenence in tree raiity bins sanning te full interval.1 < η < 2.4 ([-.1,.45], [.45,.9], an [.9,2.4]) is sown in Fig. 3 an Fig. 2 for eac target tye an aron carge. We comare our asymmetries wit teoretical calculations at NLO witout tresol resummation base on te framework escribe in Ref. [5] an summarize in te following. Using te coe of Ref. [5], te asymmetries are comute in bins of an η as te ratio of olarise to unolarise aron cross sections, were a cross section is a convolution of te muon-arton istribution function f µ a, te nucleon PDFs f N b, te erturbative artonic cross sections ˆσ a+b c+x, an te fragmentation functions (FF) D c: (,η) = σ σ (,η) = a,b,c f µ a f N b ˆσ a+b c+x D c a,b,c f µ a f N b ˆσ a+b c+x D c. (1) Here an below, sin-eenent quantities are enote by te symbol an will be referre to as olarise ones in te rest of te Letter (sin-ineenent ones as unolarise). e rocesses involve in Eq. 1 can be classifie into irect ones tat are initiate by a quasi-real oton an resolve ones tat are initiate by its fluctuation into artons. is classification is enote by te subscrit a (see Fig. 1). For irect rocesses, subscrit a refers to γ, an ( ) f µ γ is te robability for a muon to emit a quasi-real oton. For resolve rocesses, subscrit a refers to q or g, an ( ) f a µ is te convolution of tis robability wit a non-erturbative arton istribution of te oton, ( ) f γ a. e olarise version of te latter is not known exerimentally an ence taken to range between te ositive an negative
Longituinal ouble sin asymmetries in single... 7 η [-.1,.45] η [.45,.9] η [.9,2.4].2 +.1.1 -.1 Fig. 2: e asymmetry as a function of for carge aron quasi-real otorouction on te roton for tree raiity bins. e bans at te bottom inicate te systematic uncertainties, wic are ominate by time eenent fluctuations (see Sec. 4.) o: ositive aron rouction; bottom: negative aron rouction. η [-.1,.45] η [.45,.9] η [.9,2.4].2 +.2.1.1.1 -.1.1.1 Fig. 3: Same as Fig. 2, but for te euteron.
8 e COMPASS Collaboration magnitue of te unolarise one. is inuces a small uncertainty in te teoretical calculations. e values of te asymmetries are comute ere using basically te same inut istributions as in Ref. [5]: te unolarise arton istributions of te oton f γ a from GRS [16], te unolarise nucleon PDFs fb N from CEQ65 [17], an te tree olarise PDF sets from GRSV [18] (te stanar set wic corresons to te best fit to exerimental ata, an te two sets for maximum [ g(x) = g(x)] an minimum [ g(x) = g(x)] gluon istribution functions at inut scale). Using tese tree PDF sets, te integration over te range.5 < x g <.2, wic is caracteristic for te kinematic coverage of COMPASS in te gluon momentum fraction, yiels tree truncate values of G at a scale of 3 2 : G GRSVmin.6, G GRSVst.2, G GRSVmax.7. e only inuts we cange wit resect to Ref. [5] are te fragmentation functions D c, for wic we use te most recent arton-to-ion fragmentation set of Ref. [19], wic best fits te recent COMPASS ion multilicities [2]. We cecke, as it was one in Ref. [5], tat asymmetries for aron an ion rouction are almost unistinguisable, so tat it is safe to comare our exerimental ata to teoretical asymmetries comute wit a arton-toion FF set. e fractions of te total unolarise cross section for te various iniviual subrocesses are sown in Fig. 4 as a function of togeter wit te corresoning analysing ower, wic is efine as ratio of te olarise to unolarise artonic cross sections. Altoug te cross sections for rocesses involving gluons from te nucleon are not te ominant ones, te analysing ower for te γg subrocess is large in magnitue, wic makes te stuy of suc asymmetries relevant in te COMPASS kinematic region. σ ab /σ 1 σ ab /σ ab 1 1 1 2 1 γq qq gq γg qg gg 1 γq qq gq γg qg gg 4 2 4 Fig. 4: Fractions of te total cross section at NLO for a euteron target for te six subrocesses a + b c + X escribe in Sec. 1 versus (left), an corresoning analysing ower (rigt). e comutations of ( ) are erforme at COMPASS kinematics using te same cuts as in te resent ata analysis, i.e., > 1GeV/c, Q 2 < 1 2,.1 < y <.9,.2 < z <.8. For consistency, we verifie tat wen using te same inuts as in Ref. [5], we rerouce te asymmetry calculate tere. e comutations are one searately for te rouction of ositive an negative arons, an for tree istinct bins in η: [-.1,.45], [.45,.9], an [.9,2.4]. e results of tese comutations are comare to te exerimental asymmetries in Fig. 5 an Fig. 6. e ata are seen to be consistent wit te NLO calculations of Ref. [5] using te GRSV st PDF set, excet for ositive aron rouction from te roton in te raiity range.1 < η <.9. A ossible reason for tis excetion may be tat te resente moel calculations a to be one witout tresol resummation at NNL, as te formalism for te olarise case is not yet fully available. However, in contrary to te unolarise case were ata can only be escribe by QCD if tresol resummation is
Longituinal ouble sin asymmetries in single... 9 η [-.1,.45] η [.45,.9] η [.9,2.4].2 +.1.1 -.1 GRSVmin GRSVmax GRSV st Fig. 5: COMPASS asymmetries for a roton target as a function of an in tree raiity bins, comare to NLO calculations base on Ref. [5] for tree ifferent coices for te olarise gluon istribution (see text). Only statistical uncertainties are sown. Error bans on te teory curves reresent te uncertainties ue to te olarise arton istribution of te oton. o: ositive aron rouction; bottom: negative aron rouction. η [-.1,.45] η [.45,.9] η [.9,2.4].2 +.2.1.1.1 -.1.1.1 GRSVmin GRSVmax GRSV st.1.1 Fig. 6: Same as Fig. 5, but for a euteron target.
1 e COMPASS Collaboration inclue [1] 2, sin asymmetries are execte to be less affecte [21]. 6 Summary In summary, we ave resente in tis Letter a new analysis of COMPASS ata on olarise singleinclusive aron quasi-real otorouction, wic in rincile is well suite for an extraction of te gluon olarisation G in te framework of collinear QCD. Results for te longituinal sin asymmetry ( ) on olarise rotons an euterons are given searately for ositively an negatively carge arons, an in tree raiity bins. ey are comare to teoretical calculations at NLO witout tresol resummation an overall agreement is foun wit te calculations base on te GRSV st PDF set. Neverteless, calculations incluing tresol resummation at NNL are neee to extract a meaningful result on G from our ata. Acknowlegements We tank Werner Vogelsang an Marco Stratmann for many useful iscussions an for roviing us te coes for te NLO QCD calculation. We gratefully acknowlege te suort of te CERN management an staff an te skill an effort of te tecnicians of our collaborating institutes. is work was mae ossible by te financial suort of our funing agencies. References [1] C.A. Aiala, S.D. Bass, D. Hasc an G.K. Mallot, Rev. Mo. Pys. 85 (213) 655. [2] COMPASS Collaboration, C. Aol et al., submitte to Pys. Lett. B, arxiv:153.8935. [3] COMPASS Collaboration, E. Ageev et al., Pys. Lett. B 633 (26) 25. [4] COMPASS Collaboration, C. Aol et al., Pys. Lett. B 718 (213) 922. [5] B. Jäger, M. Stratmann an W. Vogelsang, Eur. Pys. J. C 44 (25) 533. [6] D. e Florian, R. Sassot, M. Stratmann an W. Vogelsang, Pys. Rev. Lett. 113 (214) 121. [7] C. Henlmeier, A. Scäfer an M. Stratmann, Eur. Pys. J. C 55 (28) 597. [8] PHENIX Collaboration, A. Aare et al., Pys. Rev. D 76 (27) 5116. [9] SAR Collaboration, B.I. Abelev et al., Pys. Rev. D 8 (29) 11118. [1] D. e Florian, M. Pfeuffer, A. Scäfer an W. Vogelsang, Pys. Rev. D 88 (213) 1424. [11] COMPASS Collaboration, C. Aol et al., Pys. Rev. D 88 (213) 9111. [12] COMPASS Collaboration, P. Abbon et al., Nucl. Instr. Met. A 577 (27) 455. [13] COMPASS Collaboration, P. Abbon et al., Nucl. Instr. Met. A 779 (215) 69. [14] COMPASS Collaboration, V. Alexakin et al., Pys. Lett. B 647 (27) 33. [15] SMC Collaboration, D. Aams et al., Pys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 533. [16] M. Glück, E. Reya an I. Scienbein, Pys. Rev. D 6 (1999) 5419. [17] J. Pumlin et al., JHEP 27 (22) 12. [18] M. Glück, E. Reya, M. Stratmann an W. Vogelsang, Pys. Rev. D 63 (21) 945. [19] D. e Florian, R. Sassot, M. Eele, R.J. Hernánez-Pinto an M. Stratmann, Pys. Rev. D 91 (215) 1435. 2 In Ref. [11], te valiity of te formalism [1] was verifie in te full η an range covere by COMPASS kinematics. is statement oes not suffer from sligtly larger y an Q 2 cuts use in te resent analysis to enance statistics, as we cecke tat te asymmetries obtaine for te two sets of cuts are comatible witin statistical uncertainties.
Longituinal ouble sin asymmetries in single... 11 [2] N. Makke, Fragmentation Functions measurement at COMPASS, 21st International Workso on Dee-Inelastic Scattering an Relate Subjects (DIS 213), Marseille, France, (213), arxiv:137.347 [21] D.P. Anerle, F. Ringer an W. Vogelsang, Pys. Rev. D 87 (213) 9421.