ANSWERS TO ODD NUMBERED EXERCISES IN CHAPTER 3

Similar documents
Econ 401A: Economic Theory Mid-term. Answers

5.1 THE ROBINSON CRUSOE ECONOMY

3. THE EXCHANGE ECONOMY

Equilibrium and Pareto Efficiency in an exchange economy

The Ohio State University Department of Economics. Homework Set Questions and Answers

Firms and returns to scale -1- John Riley

First Welfare Theorem

Differentiable Welfare Theorems Existence of a Competitive Equilibrium: Preliminaries

ANSWERS TO ODD NUMBERED EXERCISES IN CHAPTER 5. The constraint is binding at the maximum therefore we can substitute for y

The Debreu-Scarf Theorem: The Core Converges to the Walrasian Allocations

Firms and returns to scale -1- Firms and returns to scale

Economics 101. Lecture 7 - Monopoly and Oligopoly

Microeconomic Theory -1- Introduction

, αβ, > 0 is strictly quasi-concave on

The Consumer, the Firm, and an Economy

Economics 201b Spring 2010 Solutions to Problem Set 1 John Zhu

The Fundamental Welfare Theorems

Essential Microeconomics : EQUILIBRIUM AND EFFICIENCY WITH PRODUCTION Key ideas: Walrasian equilibrium, first and second welfare theorems

Introduction to General Equilibrium

Theory of Externalities Partial Equilibrium Analysis

3.2 THE FUNDAMENTAL WELFARE THEOREMS

Microeconomics II. MOSEC, LUISS Guido Carli Problem Set n 3

EC487 Advanced Microeconomics, Part I: Lecture 5

Introduction to General Equilibrium: Framework.

Competitive Equilibrium

Market Equilibrium and the Core

ε and ε > 0 we can find a δ > 0 such that

Walrasian Equilibrium in an exchange economy

The Walrasian Model and Walrasian Equilibrium

1 Second Welfare Theorem

Lecture #3. General equilibrium

Notes on General Equilibrium

PhD Qualifier Examination

Economics 501B Final Exam Fall 2017 Solutions

Advanced Microeconomics Problem Set 1

The Fundamental Welfare Theorems

Exercise 2: Equivalence of the first two definitions for a differentiable function. is a convex combination of

ECON 500 Fall Exam #2 Answer Key.

2.2 BUDGET-CONSTRAINED CHOICE WITH TWO COMMODITIES

; p. p y p y p y. Production Set: We have 2 constraints on production - demand for each factor of production must be less than its endowment

Problem Set 1 Welfare Economics

(ii) An input requirement set for this technology is clearly not convex as it

Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Chapter 6: Partial and General Equilibrium

Lecture Notes October 18, Reading assignment for this lecture: Syllabus, section I.

Econ 101A Midterm 2 Th 8 April 2009.

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Questions and Answers Econ 8712

Microeconomics Fall 2017 Problem set 1: Possible answers

International Trade with a Public Intermediate Good and the Gains from Trade

COMMUNICATION BETWEEN SHAREHOLDERS 1

Microeconomics, Block I Part 2

Fundamental Theorems of Welfare Economics

General Equilibrium. General Equilibrium, Berardino. Cesi, MSc Tor Vergata

Positive Theory of Equilibrium: Existence, Uniqueness, and Stability

1 General Equilibrium

Second Welfare Theorem

Regularity of competitive equilibria in a production economy with externalities

In the Name of God. Sharif University of Technology. Microeconomics 1. Graduate School of Management and Economics. Dr. S.

Existence, Computation, and Applications of Equilibrium

4 Lecture Applications

Introductory Microeconomics

The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics

Stationary Monetary Equilibria with Strictly Increasing Value Functions and Non-Discrete Money Holdings Distributions: An Indeterminacy Result

Final Examination with Answers: Economics 210A

Competitive Market Mechanisms as Social Choice Procedures

Economics 101 Lecture 5 - Firms and Production

Advanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6

A : a b c d a : B C A E B : d b c a b : C A B D E C : d c a c : E D B C D : a d b d : A D E B C E : a b d. A : a b c d a : B C A D E

ECONOMICS 001 Microeconomic Theory Summer Mid-semester Exam 2. There are two questions. Answer both. Marks are given in parentheses.

Econ 401A Version 3 John Riley. Homework 3 Due Tuesday, Nov 28. Answers. (a) Double both sides of the second equation and subtract the second equation

EconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 2018

Recitation #2 (August 31st, 2018)

PROFIT MAXIMIZATION. π = p y Σ n i=1 w i x i (2)

General Equilibrium with Production

Microeconomic Theory-I Washington State University Midterm Exam #1 - Answer key. Fall 2016

Beyond CES: Three Alternative Classes of Flexible Homothetic Demand Systems

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2016

Micro I. Lesson 5 : Consumer Equilibrium

Structural Properties of Utility Functions Walrasian Demand

Beyond CES: Three Alternative Classes of Flexible Homothetic Demand Systems

General Equilibrium and Welfare

Note on social choice allocation in exchange economies with Cobb-Douglas preferences

Unlinked Allocations in an Exchange Economy with One Good and One Bad

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2012

Economics 101. Lecture 2 - The Walrasian Model and Consumer Choice

Department of Agricultural Economics. PhD Qualifier Examination. May 2009

Adding Production to the Theory

Market Equilibrium Price: Existence, Properties and Consequences

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Midterm Answers Econ 805

2x2x2 Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson (H-O-S) model with factor substitution

KIER DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES

CHAPTER 3: OPTIMIZATION

0 Aims of this course

Overview. Producer Theory. Consumer Theory. Exchange

Advanced Microeconomics

Welfare Economics: Lecture 12

Microeconomics, Block I Part 1

Econ 101A Problem Set 6 Solutions Due on Monday Dec. 9. No late Problem Sets accepted, sorry!

Pure exchange competitive equilibrium under uncertainty

Lecture 1. History of general equilibrium theory


Transcription:

John Riley 5 Setember 0 NSWERS T DD NUMERED EXERCISES IN CHPTER 3 SECTIN 3: Equilibrium and Efficiency Exercise 3-: Prices with Quasi-linear references (a) Since references are convex, an allocation is a Walrasian Equilibrium if and only if it is Pareto Efficient We begin by characterizing the Pareto Efficient allocations and then solve for the no-trade equilibrium rices given that an endowment is Pareto Efficient gent h has a MRS( x, x ) ( x ) h h h / = Fig D3-: Efficient allocations For an efficient allocation in the interior of the Edgeworth ox, the two agents must have the same MRS hence the equilibrium rice ratio / = 0 (a) long the line segment, x = x = 00 long the line the MRS is 0 Thus MRS( x, x ) = (00 + α) > (00 α) = MRS( x, x ) / / Thus agent s indifference curve is steeer than that of agent and so all the allocations on are Pareto Efficient long the line segment agent s indifference curve is steeer so these allocations are also Pareto Efficient nswers Ch 3 age

John Riley 5 Setember 0 Consider the line segment Since these oints are in the interior of agent s consumtion set, the equilibrium rice line must be tangential That is, / = MRS( x, x ) = (00 + α) / Thus the rice ratio rises along from 0 to 0 rguing symmetrically, the rice ratio again rises from 0 to 0 along Exercise 3-3: Walrasian Equilibrium (a) Each igg has symmetric Cobb-Douglas references with endowment (4,8) Thus a igg sends half his income 4 + 8on each commodity His demand for commodity is therefore x = r+ 4, where r = / Define ˆ x = x + a, where a= (4,6) and ˆ ω = ω + a = (4,6) Then each ittle s otimization roblem can be rewritten as follows Max{ln xˆ + ln xˆ xˆ = ( x + a) ˆ ω} xˆ ˆ ˆ This is again the symmetric Cobb-Douglas case so x = ω Hence xˆ = r + 8 and so x = r+ Summing, the market demand for commodity by each igg-ittle air is x = 4r + 6 Suly is 8 Equating suly and demand, the equilibrium rice is / (b) t an interior PE allocation the marginal rates of substitution must be equal Thus MRS 6 + x x = = = MRS 4 + x x 6+ x x 6+ x 6+ ω 4 lying the Ratio Rule, MRS = = = = = = 4+ x x 4+ x 4+ ω 48 (c) Note that the MRS is constant for all interior PE allocations so that a change in the distribution of the total endowment has no effect on the equilibrium rice unless the new equilibrium is no longer in the interior of the Edgeworth ox nswers Ch 3 age

John Riley 5 Setember 0 C Fig D3-: Equilibrium Price Ratios (d) This is the endowment oint C Since it is Pareto Efficient there is no trade and the equilibrium rice ratio is ½ (e) For any endowment in the unshaded region the Walrasian equilibrium rice is ½ For any endowment in the shaded region the equilibrium allocation is on the boundary of the Edgeworth ox Since (4,8) is a Pareto Efficient allocation in the interior of iggs consumtion set, MRS x 8 3 ( x, x) = x = = = 4 7 Thus the new Walrasian equilibrium rice is 3/7 Exercise 3-5: More on the iggs and ittles Since the ittles get no satisfaction from commodity an efficient allocation gives all of this commodity to the iggs Similarly, all of commodity must be allocated to the ittles Thus the only PE allocation is the oint in the South East corner of the Edgeworth ox nswers Ch 3 age 3

John Riley 5 Setember 0 (4,8) 0 Fig D3-3: Unique Equilibrium llocation The sloe of the line segment connecting the endowment oint and the PE allocation is 8/0 = /5 Thus the Walrasian equilibrium rice is /5 iggs sells his 8 units of commodity and urchases 0 units of commodity Exercise 3-5: Market Excess Demand (a) While not necessary, it roves useful to define excess of (,), that is y = x j j y to be lex s consumtion in Then lex s budget constraint, x + x (7 + α) + ( α), can be rewritten as follows y + y (5 + α) ( α) lex then solves the following standard Cobb-Douglas otimization roblem Max{ U = y y y + y (5 + α) ( + α)} y 4 + The consumtion set is the set of all y Thus to be able to urchase a vector in the consumtion set it is necessary and sufficient that (5 + α) ( α) 0 Hence nswers Ch 3 age 4

John Riley 5 Setember 0 α 5 + α rguing symmetrically, ev s otimization roblem can be written as follows Max{ U = y y y + y ( + α) + (5 + α)} y 5 Thus for ev to be able to make a urchase in her consumtion set, 5 + α α (b) We have reduced the otimization roblems to standard Cobb-Douglas otimization roblems Solving, Hence y = ( (5 + α) ( + α)) and y = ( ( + α) + (5 + α)) x 5 6 (5 α) ( α) 6 6 6 5 = + + + and x = ( + α) + (5 + α) 6 6 (c) dding these two exression and then subtracting aggregate suly, market excess demand is α e( ) = x + x 8= ( ) 3 (d) Excess demand for commodity thus increases with if and only if α > 0 Note that lex has a very large fraction of the aggregate endowment if α > 0 He is a net seller of commodity thus the income effect on his demand for commodity is large and ositive ev has a small endowment of commodity so her income effect is negative but small The market income effect is therefore ositive This ositive effect more than offsets the negative substitution effects for both consumers (e) For all rice rations satisfying the inequalities in (a), excess demand is zero Thus all these rice rations are WE rice ratios Thus we have shown by examle that there can be a continuum of equilibrium rice ratios! nswers Ch 3 age 5

John Riley 5 Setember 0 Exercise 3-7: Suorting and searating hyerlanes (a) Suose there exist y inty such that y = y 0 For δ > 0 sufficiently small ŷ y δ Y = + Then ŷ = y + δ = y 0 + δ > y 0 which contradicts (i) (b) If s or t is in the interior then y = s t int Y since there exists a neighborhood around y that is in Y, the same neighborhood around s or t that is in S or T Then y < 0, that is, s < t SECTIN 3: The Fundamental Welfare Theorems Exercise 3-: Second welfare theorem with identical homothetic references Consider the economy with a single reresentative agent et xˆ = arg Max{ U( x) x y+ ω, y Y } where Y is the aggregate roduction set, that xy, F f f f is, Y = { y y = y, y Y } The aggregate roduction set Y is convex since it is f = the sum of convex sets Since U is strictly increasing, xˆ = yˆ+ ω lies on the boundary of the aggregate roduction set Thus by the searating hyerlane theorem there exists a non-zero vector such that (i) y y y U( x) > U( x) x> x * Y and (ii) ˆ ˆ It is readily shown that, if (i) is true, then f f f f y Y y yˆ From (ii), nswers Ch 3 age 6

John Riley 5 Setember 0 xˆ = arg Max{ U( x) x xˆ = ( yˆ+ ω)} xy, h Finally MRS( θ xˆ) = MRS( xˆ) Thus for any { θ h } H, h h= θ =, { h ˆ } H θ x h= is Pareto efficient H h= nswers Ch 3 age 7