Simulations of the Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment for the Sieroszowice Underground Laboratory (SUNLAB)

Similar documents
arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 11 May 2017

PoS(FPCP2017)024. The Hyper-Kamiokande Project. Justyna Lagoda

New Results from the MINOS Experiment

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 13 Apr 2018

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

Recent Results from T2K and Future Prospects

Application of GLoBES: GLACIER on conventional neutrino beams

LBNF Neutrino Beam. James Strait Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL , USA. on behalf of the LBNF/DUNE Team

PoS(NEUTEL2015)037. The NOvA Experiment. G. Pawloski University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

The Short Baseline Neutrino Program at Fermilab

Search for sterile neutrino mixing in the muon neutrino to tau neutrino appearance channel with the OPERA detector

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

Results from the OPERA experiment in the CNGS beam

PMT Signal Attenuation and Baryon Number Violation Background Studies. By: Nadine Ayoub Nevis Laboratories, Columbia University August 5, 2011

Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

EXPLORING PARTICLE-ANTIPARTICLE ASYMMETRY IN NEUTRINO OSCILLATION. Atsuko K. Ichikawa, Kyoto University

PoS(FPCP2017)023. Latest results from T2K. Jennifer Teresa Haigh, for the T2K Collaboration

Accelerator Neutrino Experiments News from Neutrino 2010 Athens

- ICARUS status and near future

Sensitivity of the DUNE Experiment to CP Violation. Lisa Whitehead Koerner University of Houston for the DUNE Collaboration

Simulations of neutrino oscillations with a high-energy beta beam from CERN to LENA at Pyhäsalmi Mine

LBL projects and neutrino CP violation in Europe

Mass hierarchy and CP violation with upgraded NOνA and T2K in light of large θ 13

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 25 Aug 2015

Giant Liquid Argon Observatory for Proton Decay, Neutrino Astrophysics and CP-violation in the Lepton Sector (GLACIER)

The future of neutrino physics (at accelerators)

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 14 Jan 2016

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 2 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

Long Baseline Neutrinos

1 Neutrinos. 1.1 Introduction

Detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

ScienceDirect. The LAGUNA-LBNO Project

Neutrino oscillations from CERN to Pyhäsalmi

PoS(Nufact08)003. Status and Prospects of Long Baseline ν Oscillation Experiments

Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at MINERvA

The CNGS neutrino beam

Neutrino Oscillations Physics at DUNE

Neutrino beam simulations and background studies for the SUNLAB location in Poland

Measurements of natural radioactivity in the salt cavern of the Polkowice Sieroszowice copper mine

Camillo Mariani Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech

Neutrino Oscillations and the Matter Effect

Longbase Neutrino Physics. Neil McCauley University of Liverpool Birmingham February 2013

Solar neutrinos and the MSW effect

arxiv: v2 [hep-ex] 28 Sep 2017

A multipurpose detector for low energy

Neutrino Event Tagging Based On Nucleon Energy Spectra

Neutrinos & the MINOS Experiment

Long baseline experiments

MINOS. Luke A. Corwin, for MINOS Collaboration Indiana University XIV International Workshop On Neutrino Telescopes 2011 March 15

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 1 Oct 2015

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 5 Mar 2004

T2K and other long baseline experiments (bonus: reactor experiments) Justyna Łagoda

Jarek Nowak University of Minnesota. High Energy seminar, University of Virginia

The T2K Neutrino Experiment

The T2K experiment Results and Perspectives. PPC2017 Corpus Christi Mai 2017 Michel Gonin On behalf of the T2K collaboration

PoS(HEP2005)177. Status of the OPERA experiment. Francesco Di Capua. Universita Federico II and INFN.

ICARUS T600 experiment: latest results and perspectives

A method for detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

Neutrino Physics: an Introduction

Recent Results from Alysia Marino, University of Colorado at Boulder Neutrino Flux Workshop, University of Pittsburgh, Dec 6 8,2012

Marcos Dracos IPHC, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS/IN2P3, F Strasbourg, France

Potential of Hyper-Kamiokande at some non-accelerator Physics and Nucleon Decay Searches

Long & Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Studies at Intense Proton Sources. Jeff Nelson College of William & Mary

Future Experiments with Super Neutrino Beams

NEUTRINO ENERGY RECONSTRUCTION IN NEUTRINO-NUCLEUS INTERACTIONS

Neutrinos From The Sky and Through the Earth

Status and Neutrino Oscillation Physics Potential of the Hyper-Kamiokande Project in Japan

The ESS neutrino facility for CP violation discovery

The NOνA Experiment and the Future of Neutrino Oscillations

MiniBooNE, LSND, and Future Very-Short Baseline Experiments

New Results for ν µ ν e oscillations in MINOS

Measuring the neutrino mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos in IceCube(-Gen2)

Particle Physics: Neutrinos part II

Long Baseline Neutrino Experiments

NEW νe Appearance Results from the. T2K Experiment. Matthew Malek Imperial College London. University of Birmingham HEP Seminar 13 June 2012

The ICARUS Project FRONTIERS IN CONTEMPORARY PHYSICS II. Vanderbilt University, March 5-10, Sergio Navas (ETH Zürich) " Atmospheric neutrinos

Discovery of the Neutrino Mass-I. P1X* Frontiers of Physics Lectures October 2004 Dr Paul Soler University of Glasgow

Neutrino Mass Hierarchy and Mixing Parameters: Long-baseline Measurements with IceCube Laura Bodine

Omnibus experiment: CPT and CP violation with sterile neutrinos

Interactions/Weak Force/Leptons

Damping signatures in future neutrino oscillation experiments

PoS(KAON13)012. R K Measurement with NA62 at CERN SPS. Giuseppe Ruggiero. CERN

1. Introduction on Astroparticle Physics Research options

arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 23 Jan 2017

Detection of MeV scale neutrinos and the solar energy paradigm

Results from the OPERA experiment in the CNGS beam

Neutrinos: Three-Flavor Effects in Sparse and Dense Matter

Constraining the T2K Neutrino Flux Prediction with 2009 NA61/SHINE Replica-Target Data arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Apr 2018

Analysis of muon and electron neutrino charged current interactions in the T2K near detectors

Observation of flavor swap process in supernova II neutrino spectra

Today: Part I: Neutrino oscillations: beam experiments. Part II: Next tutorials: making distributions with histograms and ntuples

Solar spectrum. Nuclear burning in the sun produce Heat, Luminosity and Neutrinos. pp neutrinos < 0.4 MeV

Neutrino Oscillations

Sinergie fra ricerche con neutrini da acceleratore e atmosferici

Neutrino Oscilla8ons

Neutrino Physics: Lecture 1

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2009 Prof Mark Thomson. Handout 11 : Neutrino Oscillations. Neutrino Experiments

Performance of the ICARUS T600 detector

Results from T2K. Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K

reνolution Three Neutrino Oscillation Lecture Two Lindley Winslow Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Transcription:

Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Simulations of the Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment for the Sieroszowice Underground Laboratory (SUNLAB) Related content - Large underground, liquid based detectors for astro-particle physics in Europe: scientificcase and prospects D Autiero, J Äystö, A Badertscher et al. To cite this article: Magorzata Haraczyk 2016 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 689 012019 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 46.3.198.76 on 18/01/2018 at 05:50

Simulations of the Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment for the Sieroszowice Underground Laboratory (SUNLAB) Małgorzata Harańczyk 1 1 Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Radzikowskiego 152, 31-342 Kraków, Poland E-mail: malgorzata.haranczyk@ifj.edu.pl Abstract. The Sieroszowice Underground Laboratory in Poland, SUNLAB, had been studied in the years 2008-2011 within the framework of the FP7 LAGUNA design study as an option for the realization of a next generation large volume neutrino observatory in Europe. However, in order to fully understand its physics capabilities, the feasibility studies of the SUNLAB laboratory have continued after 2011, including sensitivity calculations focused on the delta CP measurement for a large LArTPC detector at a distance of 950 km from CERN in a long baseline neutrino experiment. For this purpose the neutrino beam based on the SPS proton accelerator at CERN was simulated and the LAr data used to simulate the detector response. 1. Introduction Neutrino studies have entered a very exciting era. The discovery of neutrino mixing and oscillations over almost the two past decades has provided solid evidence for new physics beyond the Standard Model. Recently, θ 13 has been determined to be moderately large (sin 2 2θ 13 = 0.084 +/- 0.005 [1]). This discovery has opened up exciting prospects for current and future long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments towards the answers to the remaining fundamental questions, in particular the type of the neutrino mass hierarchy and the value of CP-violating phase. There is no doubt that a demonstration of CP violation in neutrino oscillations will give an important clue for models of leptonic CP violation and leptogenesis. The combined analysis from the currently running and foreseen for the near future experiments will very probably lead to the determination of the neutrino mass hierarchy. However, the measurement of CP phase is even more challenging and requires higher event statistics, i.e. high intensity neutrino and antineutrino beams and a large, sensitive detector. Several worldwide projects concerning long baseline neutrino experiments aiming at CP violation discovery have been recently discussed. The LBNF project located in the USA with the baseline of 1300 km distance, coupling the Fermilab - neutrino beam with the DUNE - far detector (Liquid Argon TPC) in the Homestake historical mine, is the most advanced one with granted financial support. Other projects, such as Hyper-Kamiokande with a 295 km baseline situated in Japan and the LAGUNA-LBNO project with the longest 2300km baseline from CERN to Pyhasalmi mine in Finland, are being or have been discussed. The physics-oriented studies of the Sieroszowice Underground Laboratory (SUNLAB) as a long baseline neutrino experiment assume a 950 km long baseline and a neutrino beam from CERN -SPS to Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. Published under licence by Ltd 1

a far detector located in the Polkowice-Sieroszowice mine. The chosen technology for the far detector is the Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LAr-TPC), known for its ability to provide excellent tracking and calorimetry performance. 2. Neutrino oscillations Neutrino oscillation is a quantum mechanical phenomenon in which a neutrino changes its flavour as it travels. This phenomenon takes place if neutrinos have non-degenerate masses and if mixing occurs. For three neutrino flavours, ν e, ν µ, ν τ, and three mass eigenstates, ν 1, ν 2, ν 3, the mixing matrix is defined by six independent parameters. There are two independent mass-squared differences among the three neutrino masses: m 21 2 = m 2 2 m 1 2, responsible for solar neutrino oscillations, and m 31 2 = m 3 2 m 1 2, responsible for atmospheric neutrino oscillations; three mixing angles: θ 12 - solar mixing angle, θ 23 - atmospheric mixing angle, θ 13 - a mixing angle which connects the solar sector with the atmospheric one; and one Dirac-type CP phase δ CP. The neutrino oscillations are studied in two ways: in the appearance experiments, where the probability that a neutrino of flavour α from the source will arrive at the far detector as a neutrino of flavour β is determined (e.g. P(ν µ ν e )), or in the disappearance experiments, where the probability of a neutrino surviving with the same flavour is measured (e.g. P(ν µ ν µ)). Depending on which oscillation parameter is to be investigated, the oscillation channel should be chosen so as to maximally emphasize the visible measurable effect. The interesting contribution to the oscillation effect from CP violating part, proportional to sin(δ CP ) and sin(θ 13 ), can be probed in a neutrino oscillation experiment by measuring the appearance probability of an electron flavour. For the disappearance experiments (α=β) the imaginary CPviolating term of the transition probability equation becomes zero. During propagation through matter, the weak interaction couples the neutrinos to matter. The ordinary matter, here the Earth's mantle, consists of electrons, protons and neutrons but it does not contain any muons, tau-leptons or antiparticles, such as positrons. The neutrinos of all three flavours (ν e, ν µ and ν τ) interact with the electrons, protons and neutrons of matter through flavour independent neutral current interaction mediated by Z bosons. Moreover, the electron neutrinos have an additional contribution because of their charged current interactions with the electrons which are mediated by the W ± exchange. This matter contribution creates an additional difference between the neutrino and antineutrino oscillation probabilities, which is the larger the longer baseline is assumed. As a result, besides the CP asymmetry caused by the CP phase δ CP, we have also a fake asymmetry induced by matter, which causes difficulties in extracting the information on δ CP. However, this fake asymmetry is related to the yet unknown neutrino mass hierarchy. Figure 1 ν e appearance probability as a function of neutrino energy for 950 km and δ CP (-π,π ); Normal mass hierarchy - blue, Inverted mass hierarchy - red. 2

The sign of m 31 2 is unknown, hence two patterns of neutrino masses are possible: m 3 > m 2 > m 1, called the Normal Hierarchy, where m 31 2 is positive, and m 2 > m 1 > m 3, called the Inverted Hierarchy, where m 31 2 is negative. The global fit [2] of all the available neutrino oscillation data in three-flavour analysis gives as the best fit for mass differences: m 21 2 = 7.5 10 5 ev 2 and m 31 2 = 2.4 10 3 ev 2 with the relative 1σ precision of 2.4% and 2.8%, respectively; for mixing angles: sin 2 θ 12 = 0.3 (1σ precision is 4%), sin 2 θ 13 =0.023 (1σ precision is 10%), sin 2 θ 23 = 0.41(1σ precision is 12%); CP phase δ CP is unknown. These values were used in the neutrino oscillation simulations presented below. Figure 1 shows the calculated probability of the electron neutrino appearance after travelling a distance of 950 km through Earth for two mass hierarchies: Normal and Inverted, for δ CP values from the range (-π,π ) - each thin line represents different δ CP value. For a better illustration, the maximal effect from CP phase δ CP = π/2 (black solid line) and δ CP = -π/2 (black dashed line) is depicted. 3. The SUNLAB laboratory The idea of SUNLAB was developed in 2007, when seven sites in Europe were considered as candidate hosts of the next generation large volume neutrino observatory within the LAGUNA FP7 design study. The location in the Polkowice-Sieroszowice mine in Poland was discussed among them and the study on excavation of large detector caverns was performed [3]. Independently, a project of a small low background underground laboratory was considered and included in the Polish Roadmap of Research Infrastructures in 2015. The SUNLAB small laboratory will be placed 950 meters below the surface in a salt-rock characterized by an extremely low level of natural radioactivity. The results of the measurements of natural radioactivity in the Sieroszowice salt-rock strata can be found in [4], while more recent measurements performed using the Germanium gamma spectrometers in the underground salt caverns are given in [5]. The Polkowice Sieroszowice mine belongs to the KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. holding of copper mines (with additions of other metals and salt layers as well) and is located in Kaźmierzów, Polkowice district, Lower Silesia province in south-western Poland. Geologically, it is located in the so called Zechstein formation, a unit of sedimentary rock layers. 4. Neutrino beam simulation A conventional neutrino beam is produced from a decay of secondary mesons (mainly pions and kaons), which are created by high energy primary protons hitting a thick target. The direction of the neutrino beam is defined by the decay tunnel towards the far detector site. The magnetic horns mounted just behind the target make it possible to choose positively (or negatively for an antineutrino beam) charged mesons of a desired energy and direct them into the decay tunnel. In our simulations, using the Geant4 package [6,7], the SPS at CERN is assumed as the source of 400 GeV protons. It is assumed to deliver 1.5x10 20 protons on target per year. The graphite target is 1 m long and two magnetic horns are placed in the so called NuMI design (horn and reflector). This kind of a setup can be operated in two modes by switching the direction of the circulating current inside the horns: positive horn focusing (PHF) mode for neutrino beam and negative horn focusing (NHF) mode for antineutrino beam. By changing the size and position of the elements of the beamline setup, one can optimise the expected neutrino flux. In our case, the first oscillation maximum for the 950 km baseline is expected at neutrino energies around 1.95 GeV (Figure 1) and the simulated setup has been optimised accordingly. An example of the optimisation process is shown in Figure 2 for the expected neutrino and antineutrino flux for three target positions. By moving the graphite target inside the horn (downstream - green line) the mesons of lower energy are chosen, and by placing the target more upstream (blue line) we get a wider spectrum and with higher energy neutrinos. In our studies, the most optimal position for the target was found just at the entrance of the horn, in the so called zero position (yellow line). 3

6th Young Researcher Meeting, L Aquila 2015 Figure 2 The muon neutrino (solid) and antineutrino (dashed) flux in the case of three different target vs horn positions The conventional muon neutrino beam from mesons decays contains contaminations by other neutrino flavours. Pions and kaons decay into muons and muon neutrinos, while the muon itself produces a muon antineutrino, electron neutrino and positron while decaying. Also kaons may decay into an electron, electron neutrino and pion. These additional neutrino flavours are the main source of background for the experiments studying the electron-neutrino appearance in the muon neutrino beam. By carefully choosing the length of the decay tunnel one can minimise the number of muon decay processes. In our simulation the length of the decay tunnel is 100 m. The final simulated neutrino flux with all neutrino flavours for both PHF and NHF modes is presented in Figure 3. Figure 3 Neutrino beam composition produced at CERN with the SPS used for accelerating protons. The neutrino flux at a distance of 100 km per year. The PHF (left) and NHF (right) modes. 5. Far detector parameterisation In this study the Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber is assumed as a far detector located in SUNLAB. LAr TPC can provide excellent imaging with a good energy resolution for large active volumes. This allows us to include in the analysis the events with complicated topology. This technology was successfully tested during the operation of the ICARUS-T600 experiment in Gran Sasso [8] and currently is under vivid development. For this simulation two detector masses are 4

assumed, the first phase detector - 20 kton of liquid Argon, and the large final phase detector - 100 kton. The reconstructed neutrino energy threshold is assumed to be 300 MeV. The detection efficiency for charged current electron (ν e CC) and muon (ν µcc) events is 100%. The energy resolution of the detector is expected to be good and here it is assumed to be 15% of E/GeV for ν e CC events and 20% of E/GeV for ν µcc. For the ν e appearance signal the ν e CC events in the far detector are searched for. The efficiency for the rejection of the background due to neutral current events is assumed to be 99.5%. An additional background source comes from muons wrongly identified as electrons - here less than 0.5%. The last assumed background comes from the intrinsic beam contamination of electron neutrinos - the most difficult to reduce, here assumed at the level of 20%. 6. Sensitivity of CP violation The neutrino oscillations, expected event rates and sensitivity of the δ CP measurement, assuming the LAr detector at SUNLAB, were calculated using the GLOBES software [9]. The Earth matter effects were included and the oscillation parameters were used as described in Section 2. Figure 4 depicts the expected signal and background event spectra in the ν e appearance channel as a function of the reconstructed neutrino energy, including the efficiency and the background rejection capabilities described in Section 5. A large influence of neutral current background events (green dashed line) in the low reconstructed energy region is visible. On the other hand, in the higher energy region the beam contamination by electron neutrinos (red dotted line) is dominant. Figure 4 The expected signal (blue line) and background event rates as a function of the reconstructed neutrino energy for appearance channel. PHF mode for 5 years, 100 kton LAr TPC, Normal hierarchy, δ CP =0 assumed. The expected event rate calculation can be done for all possible δ CP values and mass hierarchy scenarios. Based on this calculation, one can estimate the sensitivity of the CP violation discovery. The CP violation sensitivity is defined here as the ability of the experiment to distinguish between CP violation and CP conservation at an assumed confidence level, where the CP conservation refers to δ CP =0 or π. The sensitivity to the CP violation (non vanishing δ CP ) is obtained by testing the hypothesis of the CP conservation evaluating the χ 2 as a function of the value of δ CP. The evaluated χ 2 is plotted as a function of δ CP test value assumed as an alternative hypothesis. 5

6th Young Researcher Meeting, L Aquila 2015 Figure 5 Sensitivity for the non-vanishing CP phase. Normal Hierarchy assumed - left, Inverted Hierarchy assumed - right. Figure 5 shows the χ2 contours, which should be interpreted as the sensitivity to the CP violation. For this calculation the information from both neutrino and antineutrino modes were included and 5 years of data taking for each mode were assumed (10 years in total). The sensitivity was calculated separately for Normal and Inverted neutrino mass hierarchy. The black line shows the first phase scenario with the 20 kton LAr TPC detector, while the dashed orange line represents the final phase large detector of 100 kton. It is clearly visible that the SUNLAB based experiment will be most sensitive in the region of maximal CP violation (δcp =90 or -90 degrees) and in this case even the first phase detector can measure the effect on 3σ confidence level after 10 years of running. The smaller the δcp value, the more difficult the measurement, so a large 100 kton detector or a very long exposure is needed to measure the effect. These results are consistent with other neutrino long baseline projects. 7. Summary Presented simulations show that the SUNLAB laboratory equipped with a large LAr TPC detector coupled with neutrino and antineutrino beams produced at CERN-SPS could measure the non-zero CP phase reasonably well. The project of the small underground laboratory in the Polkowice - Sieroszowice mine will be unique in terms of an extremely low background from natural radioactivity. Acknowledgments We acknowledge the support from the Polish National Science Centre under the Preludium grant DEC-2011/03/N/ST2/01971. References [1] An F P, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 171803 [2] Gonzalez-Garcia M, Maltoni M, Salvado J and Schwetz T 2012 Global fit to three neutrino mixing: critical look at present precision J. High Energy Phys. JHEP12(2012)123 [3] Zalewska A, et al. 2010 Acta Phys. Pol. B 41, 1803 [4] Kisiel J, et al. 2010 Acta Phys. Pol. B 41, 1813 [5] Polaczek-Grelik K, et al. 2015 J. Radional. Nucl Ch. doi:10.1007/s10967-015-4567-6 [6] Longhin A 2010 AIP Conf. Proc. 1222 339-343 [7] Agostinelli S, et al. 2003 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506 250-303 [8] Rubbia C, et al., 2011 J. Instrum. 6 P07011 [9] Huber P, Lindner M, Winter W 2005 Comput. Phys. Commun. 167 195 6