THEOREMS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

Similar documents
14 The Postulates of Quantum mechanics

Now that we have laws or better postulates we should explore what they imply

Density matrix. c α (t)φ α (q)

The Feynman path integral

Lecture 20: Noether s Theorem

Salmon: Lectures on partial differential equations. Consider the general linear, second-order PDE in the form. ,x 2

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

ψ = i c i u i c i a i b i u i = i b 0 0 b 0 0

PHYS 215C: Quantum Mechanics (Spring 2017) Problem Set 3 Solutions

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 3 Solutions Out: Oct 1, 2008., where ( 00. ), so the overall state of the system is ) ( ( ( ( 00 ± 11 ), Φ ± = 1

5.04, Principles of Inorganic Chemistry II MIT Department of Chemistry Lecture 32: Vibrational Spectroscopy and the IR

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Calculus of Variations II

Poisson brackets and canonical transformations

Lecture 6/7 (February 10/12, 2014) DIRAC EQUATION. The non-relativistic Schrödinger equation was obtained by noting that the Hamiltonian 2

Robert Eisberg Second edition CH 09 Multielectron atoms ground states and x-ray excitations

12. The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation Michael Fowler

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. D Alembert s Principle and The Lagrangian-1

Mathematical Preparations

From Biot-Savart Law to Divergence of B (1)

1 Vectors over the complex numbers

Phys304 Quantum Physics II (2005) Quantum Mechanics Summary. 2. This kind of behaviour can be described in the mathematical language of vectors:

The non-negativity of probabilities and the collapse of state

Week3, Chapter 4. Position and Displacement. Motion in Two Dimensions. Instantaneous Velocity. Average Velocity

Grover s Algorithm + Quantum Zeno Effect + Vaidman

Lagrange Multipliers. A Somewhat Silly Example. Monday, 25 September 2013

Inner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

Yukawa Potential and the Propagator Term

763622S ADVANCED QUANTUM MECHANICS Solution Set 1 Spring c n a n. c n 2 = 1.

), it produces a response (output function g (x)

A how to guide to second quantization method.

where the sums are over the partcle labels. In general H = p2 2m + V s(r ) V j = V nt (jr, r j j) (5) where V s s the sngle-partcle potental and V nt

ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION IN A CONTINUOUS MEDIUM

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformation II

Solution 1 for USTC class Physics of Quantum Information

Homework Notes Week 7

LAGRANGIAN MECHANICS

University of Washington Department of Chemistry Chemistry 453 Winter Quarter 2015

1 Matrix representations of canonical matrices

Quantum Mechanics for Scientists and Engineers. David Miller

Quantum Mechanics I Problem set No.1

EPR Paradox and the Physical Meaning of an Experiment in Quantum Mechanics. Vesselin C. Noninski

Open string operator quantization

Canonical transformations

APPENDIX A Some Linear Algebra

Tensor Analysis. For orthogonal curvilinear coordinates, ˆ ˆ (98) Expanding the derivative, we have, ˆ. h q. . h q h q

Workshop: Approximating energies and wave functions Quantum aspects of physical chemistry

Georgia Tech PHYS 6124 Mathematical Methods of Physics I

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Principle of Virtual Work-1

Lagrangian Field Theory

Fermi-Dirac statistics

8.4 COMPLEX VECTOR SPACES AND INNER PRODUCTS

n α j x j = 0 j=1 has a nontrivial solution. Here A is the n k matrix whose jth column is the vector for all t j=0

U.C. Berkeley CS294: Beyond Worst-Case Analysis Luca Trevisan September 5, 2017

= = = (a) Use the MATLAB command rref to solve the system. (b) Let A be the coefficient matrix and B be the right-hand side of the system.

The Dirac Equation for a One-electron atom. In this section we will derive the Dirac equation for a one-electron atom.

This model contains two bonds per unit cell (one along the x-direction and the other along y). So we can rewrite the Hamiltonian as:

The Geometry of Logit and Probit

Physics 181. Particle Systems

COMPLEX NUMBERS AND QUADRATIC EQUATIONS

Linear Approximation with Regularization and Moving Least Squares

Causal Diamonds. M. Aghili, L. Bombelli, B. Pilgrim

Snce h( q^; q) = hq ~ and h( p^ ; p) = hp, one can wrte ~ h hq hp = hq ~hp ~ (7) the uncertanty relaton for an arbtrary state. The states that mnmze t

Mechanics Physics 151

Rate of Absorption and Stimulated Emission

Ph 219a/CS 219a. Exercises Due: Wednesday 23 October 2013

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Representation theory and quantum conservation laws

MEM 255 Introduction to Control Systems Review: Basics of Linear Algebra

Feb 14: Spatial analysis of data fields

Quantum Mechanics I - Session 4

A particle in a state of uniform motion remain in that state of motion unless acted upon by external force.

Lecture Notes on Linear Regression

Ph 219a/CS 219a. Exercises Due: Wednesday 12 November 2008

ON A DETERMINATION OF THE INITIAL FUNCTIONS FROM THE OBSERVED VALUES OF THE BOUNDARY FUNCTIONS FOR THE SECOND-ORDER HYPERBOLIC EQUATION

First Law: A body at rest remains at rest, a body in motion continues to move at constant velocity, unless acted upon by an external force.

1 (1 + ( )) = 1 8 ( ) = (c) Carrying out the Taylor expansion, in this case, the series truncates at second order:

The Order Relation and Trace Inequalities for. Hermitian Operators

Lecture 6. P ω ω ε χ ω ω ω ω E ω E ω (2) χ ω ω ω χ ω ω ω χ ω ω ω (2) (2) (2) (,, ) (,, ) (,, ) (2) (2) (2)

8.323 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory I

Difference Equations

CHAPTER 6. LAGRANGE S EQUATIONS (Analytical Mechanics)

Scattering of two identical particles in the center-of. of-mass frame. (b)

Implicit Integration Henyey Method

Lecture 14: Forces and Stresses

The Schrödinger Equation

Fig. 1. An example of resonance.

8.592J: Solutions for Assignment 7 Spring 2005

χ x B E (c) Figure 2.1.1: (a) a material particle in a body, (b) a place in space, (c) a configuration of the body

ON MECHANICS WITH VARIABLE NONCOMMUTATIVITY

Solution 1 for USTC class Physics of Quantum Information

Transfer Functions. Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: ( ) system

LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS. MODULE IX Lecture Multicollinearity

3.1 Expectation of Functions of Several Random Variables. )' be a k-dimensional discrete or continuous random vector, with joint PMF p (, E X E X1 E X

Integrals and Invariants of Euler-Lagrange Equations

9. Complex Numbers. 1. Numbers revisited. 2. Imaginary number i: General form of complex numbers. 3. Manipulation of complex numbers

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Newtonian Mechanics

2. Postulates of Quantum Mechanics. [Last revised: Friday 7 th December, 2018, 21:27]

Open Systems: Chemical Potential and Partial Molar Quantities Chemical Potential

XII. The Born-Oppenheimer Approximation

In this section is given an overview of the common elasticity models.

Transcription:

THEOREMS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS In order to develop methods to treat many-electron systems (atoms & molecules), many of the theorems of quantum mechancs are useful. Useful Notaton The matrx element A mn s defned by A mn = φ m A φ n dτ = <φ m A φ n > bracket notaton = (φ m A φ n ) = <m A n> The overlap ntegral between two functons s φ m φ n dτ = <φ m φ n > = <m n>. The complex conjugate of the overlap ntegral s [ φ m φ n dτ] = φ n φ m dτ = <n m> = [<m n>] Also <m m> = <m m>. Theorems The average value of a physcal quantty must be a real number.

Let A be the lnear operator for the property A. So f A s real, then <A> = <A> and A s sad to be a Hermtan Operator. For a Hermtan Operator: <A> = ψ Aψ dτ = <A> = ( ψ Aψ dτ) = ψ (Aψ) dτ Usng the above relaton, prove f Ag dτ = g (Af) dτ. If ψ = f + cg & A s a Hermtan operator, then (f + cg) A(f + cg) dτ = (f + cg)[ A(f + cg)] dτ. Left-hand sde = (f + cg) A(f + cg) dτ = (f + c g ) A(f + cg) dτ = (f + c g ) Af dτ + (f + c g ) Acg dτ = f Afdτ + c g Afdτ + c f Ag dτ + cc g Ag dτ By symmetry, the rght-hand sde = f(af) dτ + c g(af) dτ + c f ( Ag) dτ + cc g(ag) dτ Snce A s Hermtan & f Afdτ = f(af) dτ & g Ag dτ = g(ag) dτ, then, from the left- & rght-hand sdes:

c g Afdτ + c f Ag dτ = c g(af) dτ + c f ( Ag) dτ. Snce ths must hold for all c s, t must hold for c= or 1. Set c=1 to gve one eqn., set c= to gve a second eqn. Then add. c=1: g Afdτ + f Ag dτ = g(af) dτ + f ( Ag) dτ c=: - g Afdτ + f Ag dτ = g(af) dτ - f ( Ag) dτ; = - Add eqns. f Ag dτ = <φ A φ j > = <φ j A φ > = g(af) dτ. So for a Hermtan operator, <φ A φ j > = <φ j A φ > or < A j> = <j A > or A j = A j What Operators Are Hermtan? Is V(x), the potental energy operator, Hermtan? <φ j V(x) φ > = - φ j (Vφ ) dx V = V & V s just a multplcatve operator (no square roots, etc). So - φ j V φ dx = - φ j Vφ dx = - φ Vφ j dx <φ V(x) φ j > Hermtan Is p x = -h / x Hermtan? (p x = h / x) <φ p x φ j > = - φ (-h / x)φ j dx = -h - φ φ j dx

Integraton by parts: uv = uv - vu So -h - φ φ j dx = -h[φ φ j - - - φ j (φ ) dx] Assume φ & φ j are well-behaved (.e. =0) at +, so that the frst term on the rght equals 0. Then <φ p x φ j > = h - φ j (φ ) dx = - φ j ( h / x)φ dx = - φ j (p x ) φ dx = <φ j p x φ > Hermtan (Prove: T, the knetc energy operator, s Hermtan). Then H = T + V s Hermtan. PROVE: The egenvalues of a Hermtan operator are real. (Ths means they represent a physcal quantty.) For A φ = b φ, show that b = b (b s real). If A s Hermtan, then φ Aφ dτ = φ (Aφ ) dτ. Or, Then φ bφ dτ = φ (bφ ) dτ = φ b φ dτ b φ φ dτ = b φ φ dτ = b φ φ dτ So b = b PROVE: The egenfunctons of a Hermtan operator can be chosen to be orthogonal. Show that, f B F = s F & B G = t G & t s not equal to s, then <F G> = 0. Snce B s Hermtan

<F B G> = <G B F> Or <F t G> = <G s F> So t <F G> = s <G F> = s <F G> = s<f G> (t-s) <F G> = 0 t not equal to s <F G> = 0 The requrement that t s not equal to s means that F & G are ndependent egenfunctons that have dfferent egenvalues (.e. they are non-degenerate) PROVE: That n the case of degenerate egenfunctons, we can construct from these egenfunctons a new egenfuncton that wll be orthogonal. Remember: We have shown that any lnear combnaton of degenerate egenfunctons correspondng to the same egenvalue s also an egenfuncton wth the same egenvalue. Let B F = s F & B G = s G Let φ 1 & φ 2 be the new egenfunctons that wll be orthogonal. Set φ 1 = F, φ 2 = G + c F. Fnd c such that <φ 1 φ 2 > = 0. Procedure: Schmdt Orthogonalzaton <φ 1 φ 2 > = <F G + cf> = <F G > + c <F F > If <φ 1 φ 2 > = 0, then c = - <F G >/<F F >

(Unless otherwse noted, assume all egenfunctons are orthogonal & normalzed: <φ φ j > = δ j = 0 unless = j; δ = 1) Expanson n terms of egenfunctons: We can use the egenfunctons of a Hermtan operator to descrbe an arbtrary well-behaved functon. We can expand the arbtrary functon n terms of all (or a complete set) of egenfunctons of the operator. Let f be an arbtrary well-behaved functon that obeys the same boundary condtons as the complete set φ f = Σ a φ a s an expanson coeffcent To fnd a (formal soluton): <φ j f> = <φ j Σ a φ > = Σ a <φ j φ > = Σ a δ j = a j Or f = Σ <φ f> φ So, the egenfunctons of a Hermtan operator form a complete orthonormal set wth real egenvalues Egenfunctons of Commutng Operators: In Chapter 5 we stated that a wavefuncton can be smultaneously an egenfuncton of two dfferent operators f those operators commute. Or, more exactly, a necessary condton for the exstence of a complete set of smultaneous egenfunctons of two operators s that the operators commute wth each other. Ths means that the physcal propertes assocated wth the operators can be measured smultaneously.

PROVE: If there exsts a common complete set of egenfunctons for two lnear operators, then the operators commute. Let φ be the complete set of egenfunctons of the operators A & B. A φ = s φ & B φ = t φ Show that [A,B] = 0 or (AB - BA)f = 0 where f s an arbtrary functon. We can expand f n terms of the complete set of egenfunctons of A & B: f = Σ c φ So (AB - BA) f = (AB -BA) Σ c φ = Σ c (AB -BA) φ = Σ c (ABφ -BAφ ) = Σ c (A t φ -B s φ ) I = Σ c (t A φ - s B φ ) = Σ c (t s φ - s t φ ) = Σ c t s (φ - φ ) = 0 The mportant pont here s that both operators must have a common complete set of egenfunctons. The exstence of just one egenfuncton n common s not enough to guarantee that [A,B] = 0.

Look over the proofs for: If A & B commute, we can select a common complete set of egenfunctons for them. If A s a Hermtan operator wth egenfuncton φ such that Aφ = s φ & [A,B] = 0, then B j = <φ B φ j > = 0 (s not = s j ). PARITY OPERATOR - a quantum mechancal operator that has no classcal mechancal equvalent Π f(x,y,z) = f(-x,-y,-z) The party operator, Π, replaces the Cartesan coordnates wth ther negatve values. Example: Π (x 2 - z e Ay ) = (x 2 + z e -Ay ) [In Cartesan coordnates, Π (x,y,z) = (-x,-y,-z). What about sphercal polar coordnates? The allowed ranges for the varables are: 0 < r <, 0 < θ < π, 0 < φ < 2π To move nto the quadrant of (-x,-y,-z), r r, φ π + φ, θ π - θ] Fnd the egenvalues of the party operator: Π g = c g Frst, fnd Π 2 :

Π 2 f(x,y,z) = Π [Π f(x,y,z)] = Π f(-x,-y,-z) = f(x,y,z) So Π 2 = 1 (unt operator) Then Π 2 g = Π [Πg ] = Π c g = c Π g = c c g = c 2 g So c 2 = 1 & c = +1 Fnd the egenfunctons of the party operator: Π g = c g Or Π g (x,y,z) = + g (x,y,z) And Π g (x,y,z) = g (-x,-y,-z) If c = +1, g (x,y,z) = g (-x,-y,-z) & g s an even functon If c = -1, g (x,y,z) = -g (-x,-y,-z) & g s an odd functon So the egenfunctons of Π are all the possble well-behaved even & odd functons. The party relatonshps are useful n constructng varatonal wavefunctons & molecular wavefunctons (later chapters). If Π & H commute, we can select a common set of egenfunctons. H = -h 2 /(2m) ( 2 / x 2 + 2 / y 2 + 2 / y 2 ) + V [H, Π] = -h 2 /(2m)[ 2 / x 2, Π] - h 2 /(2m)[ 2 / y 2, Π] - h 2 /(2m)[ 2 / z 2, Π] + [V, Π] Consder [ 2 / x 2, Π] = 2 / x 2 Π - Π 2 / x 2 :

Π 2 / x 2 φ(x,y,z) = / (-x) / (-x) φ(-x,-y,-z) = [- / x][- / x] φ(-x,-y,-z) = 2 / x 2 φ(-x,-y,-z) = 2 / x 2 Π φ(x,y,z) So [ 2 / x 2, Π] = 0 = [ 2 / y 2, Π] = [ 2 / z 2, Π] Consder [V, Π] = VΠ - ΠV ΠV(x,y,z) φ(x,y,z) = V(-x,-y,-z) φ(-x,-y,-z) If V s an even functon, V(x,y,z) = V(-x,-y,-z) ΠV(x,y,z) φ(x,y,z) = V(x,y,z) φ(-x,-y,-z) = V(x,y,z) Πφ(x,y,z); V & Π commute. Otherwse they don t commute. So [H, Π] = 0 f V s an even functon. When V s even, we can choose the ψ so that they are even or odd,.e. have defnte party. Ths s used n the Varaton Method to construct the approprate wavefuncton. MEASUREMENT & SUPERPOSITION OF STATES: The basc method s a scheme for calculatng the probabltes of varous possble outcomes of a measurement. Example: If the state functon, Ψ(x,t) s known, the probablty of fndng the partcle between x & x+dx s Ψ(x,t) 2 dx.

In general, consder the property, G: How can we calculate the probablty for each possble result of the measurement of G? (Assume there are N partcles & three coordnates; Let q represent the poston coordnates.) G φ (q) = g φ (q) The egenfunctons of any Hermtan operator form a complete set (.e. they are all the lnearly ndependent egenfunctons). The φ form a complete set, so we can expand any arbtrary wavefuncton n terms of them: Requre Ψ(q,t) = Σ c (t)φ (q) Ψ Ψ dτ = 1, where dτ s the volume element for the spatal coordnates (not tme). Then 1 = Σc (t)φ (q) Σ c j(t)φ j (q) dτ j = Σc Σ c j φ (q)φ j (q) dτ = Σc Σ c jδ j j = Σ c 2 Choose the c s so that 1 = Σ c 2

Snce Ψ(q,t) s a normalzed state functon, we can wrte the average value of G as <G> = Ψ(q,t) G Ψ(q,t) dτ = Σc (t)φ (q) G Σ c j(t)φ j (q) dτ j = Σc Σ c j φ (q) G φ j (q) dτ j = Σc Σ c j φ (q) g j φ j (q) dτ j

= Σc Σ c j g j φ (q) φ j (q) dτ j = Σc Σ c j g j δ j j = Σ c 2 g We have prevously defned the average value n terms of the probablty of gettng one of the egenvalues, g, when G s measured (.e. When a property s measured, we can only get one of the egenvalues as a result. No other numbers are possble.) Then <G> = Σ Pg g, where Pg s the probablty of fndng the egenvalue g. So Pg = c 2 We can predct the result of the measurement of G wth certanty only f all the c s except one are 0: c = 0, not equal to k; c k not equal to zero. Then c k 2 = 1 & the result of the measurement wll be g k & ψ k = φ k snce all the other c s are 0. So Ψ(q,t) = Σ c (t)φ (q) gves the state functon as a superposton of egenstates, φ, of G. The coeffcent, c, of φ n the expanson s related to the probablty of fndng the egenvalue g when G s measured (.e.

The larger the contrbuton of φ n the expanson - ndcated by the magntude of c - the larger the probablty of measurng that egenvalue). Calculate c : Ψ(q,t) = Σ c (t)φ (q) φ j (q) Ψ dτ = φ j (q) [Σ c (t)φ (q)] dτ = Σ c (t) φ j (q) φ (q) dτ = Σ c (t) δ j = c j = <φ j Ψ> = probablty ampltude So the probablty of measurng g j as a value of G s: c j 2 = <φ j Ψ> 2 = φ j (q) Ψ (q,t) dτ 2 So, f we know Ψ, we can predct the outcome of the measurement of G. Example: G = p x lnear momentum φ = e k x/h ; g = k We prevously found the general form for the wavefuncton for a free partcle n one dmenson: Ψ = a 1 e -Et/h e (2mE) x/ h + a 2 e -Et/h - (2mE) x/ h e = c 1 e k 1 x/ h + c 2 e k 2 x/ h, where c 1 = a 1 e -Et/h, c 2 = a 2 e -Et/h, k 1 = (2mE), k 2 = - (2mE).

So c 1 2 = a 1 e -Et/h 2 = a 1 2 e Et/h e -Et/h = a 1 2 = the probablty of gettng k 1 when measurng G. And c 2 2 = a 2 2 = the probablty of gettng k 2 when measurng G. The probablty of gettng any other number when measurng G s zero. So Ψ n (q,t) = e -E n t/h ψ n(q) s a statonary state & Hψ n(q) = E n ψ n(q) For a statonary state, the probablty densty does not depend on tme: Ψ n (q,t) 2 = ψ n (q) 2 s ndependent of t. If we take a superposton of statonary states, Ψ n, Ψ = Σ c n Ψ n = Σ c n e -E t/h n ψ n n n s not an egenfuncton of H, but s an egenfuncton of the tmedependent Schrödnger Eq. [-h / t + H] Ψ = 0 Ψ doesn t have a defnte energy because t s a combnaton of the ψ n, each wth energy E n. The probablty of gettng E n when the energy s measured s

c n e -E n t/h 2 = c n 2. Ψ s a nonstatonary state because the probablty densty depends on t due to cross terms of the form e -E n t/h e E n t/h Physcal example: If a system that s n a statonary state s exposed to radaton (.e. a laser feld whose potental vares wth tme) the state changes to a nonstatonary state.