ON THE CLASS OF SATURATION IN THE THEORY OF APPROXIMATION II" GEN-ICHIRO SUNOUCHI

Similar documents
CHARACTERIZATION OF CERTAIN CLASSES OF FUNCTIONS GEN-ICHIRO SUNOUCHI. (Received December 4, 1961) sin kx). fc-0 fc = l. dt = o(iχ

W. Lenski and B. Szal ON POINTWISE APPROXIMATION OF FUNCTIONS BY SOME MATRIX MEANS OF CONJUGATE FOURIER SERIES

1.5 Approximate Identities

The Hilbert Transform and Fine Continuity

INTRODUCTION TO REAL ANALYSIS II MATH 4332 BLECHER NOTES

Real Analysis Problems

be the set of complex valued 2π-periodic functions f on R such that

Fourier Series. 1. Review of Linear Algebra

Section 4.2 The Mean Value Theorem

P. L. DUREN AND A. L. SHIELDS

Singular Integrals. 1 Calderon-Zygmund decomposition

MATH 5640: Fourier Series

BOUNDARY PROPERTIES OF FIRST-ORDER PARTIAL DERIVATIVES OF THE POISSON INTEGRAL FOR THE HALF-SPACE R + k+1. (k > 1)

1.1 Appearance of Fourier series

Austin Mohr Math 704 Homework 6

NOTES ON FOURIER ANALYSIS (XLVIII): UNIFORM CONVERGENCE OF FOURIER SERIES SHIN-ICHI IZUMI AND GEN-ICHIRO SUNOUCHI. (Received April 5, 1951)

Topics in Harmonic Analysis Lecture 1: The Fourier transform

MATHS 730 FC Lecture Notes March 5, Introduction

Exercise 1. Let f be a nonnegative measurable function. Show that. where ϕ is taken over all simple functions with ϕ f. k 1.

THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515

Section Taylor and Maclaurin Series

BASES FROM EXPONENTS IN LEBESGUE SPACES OF FUNCTIONS WITH VARIABLE SUMMABILITY EXPONENT

Chapter 5. Measurable Functions

MATH. 4548, Autumn 15, MWF 12:40 p.m. QUIZ 1 September 4, 2015 PRINT NAME A. Derdzinski Show all work. No calculators. The problem is worth 10 points.

Fourier Series. ,..., e ixn ). Conversely, each 2π-periodic function φ : R n C induces a unique φ : T n C for which φ(e ix 1

Some approximation theorems in Math 522. I. Approximations of continuous functions by smooth functions

Syllabus Fourier analysis

DIFFERENTIAL CRITERIA FOR POSITIVE DEFINITENESS

Finite-dimensional spaces. C n is the space of n-tuples x = (x 1,..., x n ) of complex numbers. It is a Hilbert space with the inner product

UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS CONTEST Spring 2018 Calculus Test

Review of Power Series

MATH 409 Advanced Calculus I Lecture 10: Continuity. Properties of continuous functions.

for all subintervals I J. If the same is true for the dyadic subintervals I D J only, we will write ϕ BMO d (J). In fact, the following is true

2 K cos nkx + K si" nkx) (1.1)

Chapter 6. Integration. 1. Integrals of Nonnegative Functions. a j µ(e j ) (ca j )µ(e j ) = c X. and ψ =

Lecture 4: Fourier Transforms.

INTEGRABILITY CONDITIONS PERTAINING TO ORLICZ SPACE

Multidimensional Riemann derivatives

GIBBS' PHENOMENON FOR A FAMILY OF SUMMABILITY METHODS. (Received December 14, 1965)

OBJECTIVES Use the area under a graph to find total cost. Use rectangles to approximate the area under a graph.

Outline of Fourier Series: Math 201B

ESTIMATES FOR MAXIMAL SINGULAR INTEGRALS

Polynomial Approximations and Power Series

Let R be the line parameterized by x. Let f be a complex function on R that is integrable. The Fourier transform ˆf = F f is. e ikx f(x) dx. (1.

Absolutely convergent Fourier series and classical function classes FERENC MÓRICZ

ON THE GIBBS PHENOMENON FOR HARMONIC MEANS FU CHENG HSIANG. 1. Let a sequence of functions {fn(x)} converge to a function/(se)

FOURIER SERIES WITH THE CONTINUOUS PRIMITIVE INTEGRAL

Topics in Fourier analysis - Lecture 2.

A NOTE ON CONVERGENCE AND SUMMABILITY FACTORS J. CLEO KURTZ. (Received June 20, 1967)

A glimpse of Fourier analysis

LECTURE 10: REVIEW OF POWER SERIES. 1. Motivation

Fall f(x)g(x) dx. The starting place for the theory of Fourier series is that the family of functions {e inx } n= is orthonormal, that is

8.7 Taylor s Inequality Math 2300 Section 005 Calculus II. f(x) = ln(1 + x) f(0) = 0

CALCULUS JIA-MING (FRANK) LIOU

FUNCTIONALS OF FINITE DEGREE AND THE CONVERGENCE OF THEIR FOURIER-HERMITE DEVELOPMENTS

7: FOURIER SERIES STEVEN HEILMAN

1. State the informal definition of the limit of a function. 4. What are the values of the following limits: lim. 2x 1 if x 1 discontinuous?

ALMOST EVERYWHERE CONVERGENCE OF FEJÉR MEANS OF SOME SUBSEQUENCES OF FOURIER SERIES FOR INTEGRABLE FUNCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE KACZMARZ SYSTEM

CHARACTERIZATION OF THE FOURIER SERIES OF A DISTRIBUTION HAVING A VALUE AT A POINT

Lecture 32: Taylor Series and McLaurin series We saw last day that some functions are equal to a power series on part of their domain.

13. Examples of measure-preserving tranformations: rotations of a torus, the doubling map

MATH 104: INTRODUCTORY ANALYSIS SPRING 2008/09 PROBLEM SET 8 SOLUTIONS

Take-Home Final Examination of Math 55a (January 17 to January 23, 2004)

1/12/05: sec 3.1 and my article: How good is the Lebesgue measure?, Math. Intelligencer 11(2) (1989),

ON THE DIVERGENCE OF FOURIER SERIES

symmetric space V (irreducible or not) is again Hermitian and is isomorphic to V. REFERENCES

GALOIS GROUP OF AN EQUATION X n -ax+b=0

Introduction to Fourier Analysis

Herz (cf. [H], and also [BS]) proved that the reverse inequality is also true, that is,

ON APPROXIMATION TO FUNCTIONS IN THE

Ma 530 Power Series II

1 Definition of the Riemann integral

CHAPTER 3: CONTINUITY ON R 3.1 TWO SIDED LIMITS

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

On some modules associated with Galois orbits by Victor Alexandru (1), Marian Vâjâitu (2), Alexandru Zaharescu (3)

MATH & MATH FUNCTIONS OF A REAL VARIABLE EXERCISES FALL 2015 & SPRING Scientia Imperii Decus et Tutamen 1

FOURIER TRANSFORMS. 1. Fourier series 1.1. The trigonometric system. The sequence of functions

NEW BOUNDS FOR TRUNCATION-TYPE ERRORS ON REGULAR SAMPLING EXPANSIONS

Analysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall F(x) = 1 x. f(t)dt. t 1 2. tf 2 (t)dt. and g(t, x) = 2 t. 2 t

Bernstein s inequality and Nikolsky s inequality for R d

ON McCONNELL'S INEQUALITY FOR FUNCTIONALS OF SUBHARMONIC FUNCTIONS

Math Camp II. Calculus. Yiqing Xu. August 27, 2014 MIT

(3) 6(t) = /(* /(* ~ t), *(0 - /(* + 0 ~ /(* ~t)-l,

July 21 Math 2254 sec 001 Summer 2015

(4) cn = f f(x)ux)dx (n = 0, 1, 2, ).

Chapter 8 Integral Operators

A Riemann Lebesgue Lemma for Jacobi expansions

Average theorem, Restriction theorem and Strichartz estimates

consists of two disjoint copies of X n, each scaled down by 1,

REAL ANALYSIS II: PROBLEM SET 2

Math 112 Rahman. Week Taylor Series Suppose the function f has the following power series:

be the geodesic disk of radius ε with the center w. We put M ε under the Dirichlet condition on 3B ε

On pointwise estimates for maximal and singular integral operators by A.K. LERNER (Odessa)

Entrance Exam, Real Analysis September 1, 2017 Solve exactly 6 out of the 8 problems

MATH 522 ANALYSIS II LECTURE NOTES UW MADISON - FALL 2018

A CONVERGENCE CRITERION FOR FOURIER SERIES

f(s) e -i n π s/l d s

are harmonic functions so by superposition

Analysis Qualifying Exam

Classical Fourier Analysis

Transcription:

ON THE CLASS OF SATURATION IN THE THEORY OF APPROXIMATION II" GEN-ICHIRO SUNOUCHI (Received July 20,1960) 1. Introduction. We have already determined the class of saturation for various methods of summation in the theory of Fourier series and Fourier integral (Sunouchi-Watari [4], Sunouchΐ [5]). In the present note, the author will determine the saturation class of local approximation of functions. In the preceding case, we have used Fourier transform or Fourier series essentially. But in the present case, we have to make another device. For the sake of simplicity, we will only study about the uniform approximation by the first arithmetic means. But it is evident that our method is applicable for another approximation norms and another summation methods. Incidently, this method is applicable to determine the saturation class for such approximation process as Landau's singular integral. This approximation process has somewhat different feature from the periodic case. 2. Local saturation. Let f(x) be integrable and periodic with period 2ττ and <r n (x, /) = <r n (x) be the n-ih Fejer means of the Fourier series of f(x). Moreover we suppose [α, 6] is a fixed closed subinterval situated in [0, 2τrj. Then we have the following theorem. ^ THEOREM 1 2). (1) If σ n (χ) - f(x) = o(l/n) uniformly in [_a, i], then f(x) is a constant in [a, b~\. (2) If <r n (x) f(x) = O(l/n) uniformly in [a, fc], then f'(x) is essentially bounded in [a, &]. For the proof of Theorem 1, we need a lemma. LEMMA. [0, 2ττ], then bourdedly. If h(x) is periodic with period 2ττ and h"(x) is continuous in \ιmn{σ n (χ 9 h) h(x)\ = h'(x) n->oα PROOF. Interchanging the roles of h(x} and the conjugate of h(x\ we shall 1) Research supported in part by the National Science Foundation (U.S.A.). 2) The author assumed previously that f(x) is integrable. He is obliged to Professor Zygmund for removing this assumption.

ON THE CLASS OF SATURATION prove limn{<r n (x, K) h(x)} = ti(x) n~>oo bourdedly, under the assumption that ti'(x) is continuous. The Taylor expansion yields h(x + t) - h(x - t) = 2th'(x) + 2fh"[x + θ(x - t)}. By the well known formula (Zygmund [6], p.91), we have σ n (x, K) - h(x) = ι_- r ih(x + o - h(x - 1)\ * (n τr(n + l)jo (2sin 0 2(sinί/2) 2 4-1 * ^ /' oiiiy/* τ Jiyfr 7. ' -' ' 2(sinί/2) 2 say. But and limjlγ^sin(. + l>»->- 7r J 0 2(sin /2) 2 J = O (1/n) by the Riemann-Lebesgue theorem. Thus we complete the proof of Lemma. PROOF OF THEOREM. (1) If we denote by C 0, the class of functions g(x) such that g(x) = 0 outside of [#, b~\ and g'"(x) is continuous in [0, 2ττ]. evidently g'\x) is continuous in [0, 2ττ]. Since n\σ n (x, f) - f(x)\ tends to zero bourdedly in [α, b\ we have for all g(x) 6 C 0. lim Γn[<r Λ (x, /) ~ f(x)}g(x}dx = 0 W->oo J Q Then

114 G.SUNOUCHI Since <r n (x, f) has a symmetric kernel, we can interchange f(x) and g(x\ that is, J Γ n\<r n (x, f) - 0 f(x~)}g(x)dx On the other hand, Lemma gives bourdedly. Thus we get /.2τ = I n[σ n (χ 9 g) - g(x)}f(x)dx. Jo limn{<r n (x, g) g(x)} = g(x\ n^oo Γf(x)H'(x)dx = 0. Ό By ParsevaΓs relation, this is equivalent to where F(x) is an indefinite integral of f(x). So, by the well known lemma (Courant and Hubert [3], p.20l), F(x) is a linear function in [α, b~] and f(x) is a constant in [<z, έ]. (2) The proof of the second part is almost the same. Since n[v*(x, f) - f(x)\ =0 (1) uniformly in [α, 6], by the weak compactness of the space L 00 (a,b\ we can take a subsequence W A and a function λ( r) Lj^a, ti) such that for all g(x) C 0, But the left-hand side is lim I n k { σ nk ( χ > /) "" / A -^oo J Q f and the right-hand side is /.27C = / h(x)g(x)dχ. ^o '2τr ^^ «27t ^^ f(x)g\x)dx = I F(x)g\x)d Jo Γ where H 2 (x) is the second integral of J o H z (x)g"(x)dx, h(x).

ON THE CLASS OF SATURATION 115 Thus we can conclude that f(χ) is an indefinite integral of a bounded function in [α, ]. THEOREM 2. We suppose that f(χ) is integrable in [0, 2ττ] If f(x) is constant in [a, ], then <r n (x) f(x) = o(l/n) uniformly in [a + δ, b δ] /or any fixed δ > 0. And if f'(x) is bounded in {a, b~\, then <r n (x) f(x) = O(l/n) uniformly in [a 4- δ, b δ]. PROOF. We set A(X) the Dirichlet kernel and A k (x) = a k cos jb; + b k sin fcr. Then by a theorem of localization [Zygmund 6, p. 367], 1 Γ*^.^,.. d* r_, βί)]λ is uniformly summable (C,l) to zero in [a + δ/2, έ δ/2], where = a constant, and = fc=0 fc=ι 1, in [α + δ/2, b - δ/2] 0, outside [α, is continuous with derivatives of sufficiently high order. successively, Integrating by parts * (*) - (C, 1) ~ F(t)\(t)1D n (x - t)dt = o(ϋ> uniformly in [a + δ/2, b δ/2], where r n (χ) is the n-th (C, l)-mean of trigonometric series Σ ka*(x). Since f(x) exists in [Λ, b~\, by the Riemann-Lebesgue theorem we have - Γ 6-fi/2-^ τ.(a:) - (C, 1) I uniformly in [α -1- δ, b δ] Hence, in the case f'(x) = 0 in [α, έ] IK(x) e = 0 (i) f'(x}d n (x - t)dt = o(l) where C means C-norm with respect to the interval \a + δ, b δ]. Since σ n (x) σn.^x) = S n -\(x)/n(n 1) where 5 M (.r) is the w-th partial sum of y^ ^A fc (^:), jf σ^α:) σ^) = ^ Sn-ι(x)/n(n 1)

G. SUNOUCHI ^ 1 \, τ*(x) _ r a (χ)»-1 n + l) M-l N-l Hence we get Letting M-*, Thus we get the first part of the Theorem. the same. The proof of the remaining part is From the above two theorems, we can conclude Theorem 3. THEOREM 3. For the Fourier series of f(x), which is integrable and periodic, the local saturation of the first arithmetic means for the uniform approximation over (a, b) is [_\f(po)\f'(x) is bounded over [a, b}\, 1/n, f(x) is constant over (a, )]. 3. Landau's singular integral. The singular integral of Landau is defined by u, k n where k n is the normalization factor. Since f(x) is not necessarily periodic, we subtract a linear function from f(x) and suppose f(x) is periodic. But the kernel is not periodic. A useful result of Arnold [1] is that limn\s n (x,f)-f(a:)} n-»oo = JL/'(*) ^ provided that f"(x) exists and this converges boundedly provided that f\x) is bounded. Our theorem is the following. THEOREM 4. (1) If S n (x 9 f) -f(x) = o(l /n) uniformly, then f(x) is a linear function. (2) If S n (x,f) - f(x) = O(l/n) uniformly, then f(x) Lipl. (3) Iff\x) Lip 1, then S n (x,f) - f(x) = O(l/«) uniformly.

ON THE CLASS OF SATURATION From this, we can say: The saturationof Landau's singular integral is Sat[S n (xy]c = l{f(x)\f'(x) Lip 1], 1/n, linear function]. This is the affirmative answer to a conjecture of Butzer ([2], ploo). PROOF. (1) From the hypothesis, we have lim fn\f(x} - S n (x,f)]e- kx dx = 0. n->co J υ Noticing the fact that the kernel is symmetric and using the above mentioned Arnold's results,the left-hand side is equal to lim where a k is the Fourier coefficient of f(x). Consequently we get (2) Since β» = 0 (k = ±l, ±2,... ). \\f(x)-s n (x,f)\\ ΰ =0(l/n), by the weak compactness Loo-space, there is a function c/(x) Ξ L=o(0, 1) and a subsequence \n p \ of natural numbers such that lim fn,\f(x) - p Λ S np (x,f)\e- **dx = C g(x)e- Mk 'dx. Jo By the same argument with the case (l), we have τr 2 V = g(x)e-^^dx, (k = ±l, ±2,... ), that is f'\x) Loo(0, 1). This is equivalent with the fact f\x) Lip 1. (3) If f\x) Lip 1, then f"(x) exists almost everywhere and is essentially bounded. So we have, from Arnold's result,

But the continuity of f(x) S n (x, f) yields /Or) - S n (x, /) = 0(l/«) uniformly. Thus the theorem is proved completely. LITERATURES [ 1 ] G. A. ARNOLD, On the order of approximation of continuous functions by singular integrals of certain special form. Math. Shorn. N. S. 29 (1951), 427-432 [Russ]. [2] P. L.BUTZER, Zur Frage der Saturationsklassen singularer Integraloperatoren, Math. Zeitschr., 70 (1958), 93-112. [3] R.COURANT AND D.HlLBERT, Methods of Mathematical Physics, New York, 1953. [4] G. SUNOUCHI AND C. WATARI, On determination of the class of saturation in the theory of approximation of functions I, Proc, Japan Acad. 34 (1958), 477-481. II, Tohoku Math. Journ. 11 (1959), 480-488. [ 5 ] G. SUNOUCHI, On the class of saturation in the theory of approximation I, Tohoku Mah. Journ. 12 (1960), 339-344. [6] A.ZYGMUND, Trigonometrical series I, Cambridge, 1959. NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY, EVANSTEN, U. S. A. AND TOHOKU UNIVERSITY, SENDAI, JAPAN.